Expression of the Lung Resistance Protein Predicts Poor Outcome in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia

P-glycoprotein (PGP), lung resistance-related protein (LRP) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) expression in acute promyelocytic leukaemia

We analysed the expression of three drug transporter proteins [p-glycoprotein (PGP), lung resistance-related protein (LRP) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1)] involved in anthracycline resistance that are frequently overexpressed in poor-risk adult acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia (ANLL), in 23 acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) patients at onset managed at a single institution. Cellular daunorubicin accumulation was also evaluated. At onset, no case had PGP or MRP1 expression that exceeded that of non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) cell lines. Only one case showed LRP overexpression. No peculiar MDR features distinguished the seven patients who relapsed from those who maintained complete remission. In the onset vs. first relapse, only one patient showed an increased (threefold) PGP expression at relapse. At second relapse, three out of four patients showed a PGP expression two- to threefold higher than baseline values. These results are consistent with the view that low PGP, LRP and MRP1 expression and the absence of defects in intracellular drug accumulation may account for the peculiarly high sensitivity of APLs to anthracycline. It does not support the screening of MDR markers in APL patients at onset as predicting factors of early relapse. The results suggest that no significant changes in PGP, LRP or MRP1 expression are likely to occur at first relapse. In contrast, PGP expression is likely to increase later in the patient history as a result of additional chemotherapy courses.

Novel mechanisms of drug resistance in leukemia

A key issue in the treatment of acute leukemia is the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Several mechanisms may account for this phenomenon, including failure of the cell to undergo apoptosis in response to chemotherapy, or failure of the drug to reach and/or affect its intracellular target. This review focuses on the latter mechanism, and on intracellular drug transport resistance mechanisms in particular. Expression of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter P-glycoprotein (Pgp) has generally been reported to correlate with prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Additionally, but more controversial, expression of the ABC transporter multidrug resistance protein (MRP) and the vault-transporter lung resistance protein (LRP) have been correlated with outcome in AML. Despite these findings, functional efflux assays indicate the presence of non-Pgp, non-MRP transporters in AML. Recently, a novel ABC transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) was cloned and sequenced in our laboratory. Transfection and overexpression of BCRP in drug-sensitive cells confers drug-resistance to the cells. BCRP is a half-transporter, and may homodimerize or form heterodimers (with a yet unknown half-transporter) to produce an active transport complex. Relatively high expression of BCRP mRNA is observed in approximately 30% of AML cases, suggesting a potential role for this new transporter in drug resistance in leukemia.

P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein, but not lung resistance protein, lower the intracellular daunorubicin accumulation in acute myeloid leukaemic cells

The in vitro intracellular daunorubicin accumulation (IDA) of blast cells from 69 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was correlated with the expression and functional activity of the multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins, P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) and lung-resistance protein (LRP). An inverse and significant association was found between IDA and Pgp-related efflux activity (r = -0.31, P = 0.01) and also MRP (r = -0.25, P = 0.04) but not with LRP (r = -0.13, P = 0.28). Coexpression of the MDR proteins had an additive effect in further lowering of IDA levels, suggesting that the clinical MDR phenotype is dependent on the sum of multiple MDR factors available to the leukaemic cell. Thus, the median IDA of leukaemic cells without any MDR proteins was significantly higher than that of blasts carrying two MDR proteins (0.466 vs. 0.296, P = 0.046). Seven patients with no expression of Pgp, MRP and LRP still had low IDA levels, suggesting the presence of efflux MDR mechanisms other than those studied. The relation of IDA to clinical parameters known to be associated with poor prognosis, such as age, secondary AML, karyotype, peripheral blood blast and CD34 counts, was also studied, but no significance was found on multifactorial analysis. There was a non-significant trend for earlier relapse in patients with low IDA levels (leukaemia-free survival of 16.3 months compared with 21.1 months in patients with high IDA levels). Our data suggest that, while the IDA assay is a quick and relatively easy test for the combined efflux MDR phenotype, it is unable to detect other MDR mechanisms, such as LRP, which may be important to the clinical outcome of patients with AML.

Drug resistance factors in acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative analysis

To compare the clinical relevance of drug resistance factors in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we determined their relationship to both response to induction chemotherapy and survival of the patients in univariate as well as multivariate analyses. The drug resistance factors immunocytochemically studied in 111 patients at the time of diagnosis included the lung resistance protein (LRP), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) and bcl-2. In the univariate analyses, age (P = 0.005), karyotype (P = 0.03), LRP (P = 0.003), P-gp (P = 0.02) and bcl-2 (P = 0.03) predicted for response to induction chemotherapy, whereas MRP1 had no predictive value. Age (P = 0.05), karyotype (P = 0.05) and LRP (P = 0.03) retained their predictive value in the multivariate logistic regression analyses. With regard to overall survival, age (P = 0. 008), karyotype (P = 0.006), LRP (P = 0.001) and P-gp (P = 0.01) were of prognostic value in the univariate Cox regression analyses but only age (P = 0.01), karyotype (P = 0.02) and LRP (P = 0.01) retained their prognostic significance in the multivariate analyses. A risk score based on the number of independent prognostic factors allowed division of patients into four groups with different outcome. In these groups, the complete remission rates were 93%, 75%, 47% and 33%, respectively, and median overall survival was 2.4, 1.2, 0.6 and 0.2 years, respectively. Thus, several drug resistance factors did predict outcome in the univariate analyses but LRP was the only drug resistance factor with independent predictive and prognostic significance. The proposed risk score might be useful for risk-adapted treatment in the future. Leukemia (2000) 14, 68-76.

The lung resistance protein (LRP) predicts poor outcome in acute myeloid leukemia

To determine the clinical significance of the lung resistance protein (LRP) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we have studied LRP expression of leukemic blasts and its association with clinical outcome in patients with de novo AML. LRP expression of leukemic blasts was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibody LRP-56. LRP expression at diagnosis was detected in 31 out of 86 (36%) patients and correlated with white blood cell count (p = 0.01). The complete remission rate of induction chemotherapy was 72% for all treated patients (n = 82). The complete remission rate was 81% for patients without LRP expression but only 55% for patients with LRP expression (p = 0.01). Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier in 82 and 59 patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 16 months, median overall survival was 17 months for LRP-negative patients but only 8 months for LRP-positive patients (p = 0.006). Disease-free survival was 9 months for LRP-negative patients and 6 months for LRP-positive patients (p = 0.078). Thus LRP predicts for poor outcome indicating that the LRP gene is a clinically relevant drug resistance gene in AML.

MRP expression in acute myeloid leukemia. An update

To determine the clinical significance of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) in patients with de novo AML, we have studied MRP expression of leukemic cells at diagnosis and its association with clinical outcome in 127 patients. MRP expression was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibodies QCRL-1/QCRL-3. MRP expression was low, intermediate and high in 30%, 46% and 24% of the patients, respectively. MRP expression was independent of age and sex of the patients, white blood cell count, FAB subtype, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and karyotype aberrations. MRP expression had no impact no response to induction chemotherapy. The complete remission rates were 75%, 70% and 64% for patients with low, intermediate and high expression, respectively. Patients with intermediate or high MRP expression showed a trend toward shorter overall survival (p = 0.09) as compared to patients with low MRP expression. MRP does not predict for response to induction chemotherapy but intermediate or high MRP expression might be associated with shorter overall survival of the patients.

High levels of lung resistance related protein mRNA in leukaemic cells from patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia are associated with inferior response to chemotherapy and prior treatment with mitoxantrone

Expression of the mdr1 (multidrug resistance), mrp (multidrug resistance associated protein), and lrp (lung resistance related protein) genes is associated with transport related MDR (multidrug resistance). We quantified mRNA levels of these genes using competitive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 128 samples of leukaemic cells from 92 patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML). There was a wide variation between the samples in mRNA levels of all three genes. The mean mdr1 mRNA level was 1.3 transcripts per cell (range undetectable to 15.8), the mean mrp level was 7.9 (range 0.1-36.2) and mean lrp 3.9 (range 0.1-29). Lrp mRNA levels were higher in samples drawn at diagnosis from the 15 patients with resistant disease than from the 37 with chemosensitive disease (4.9 SD 3.1 v 2.9 SD 2.3, P = 0.016). Neither mdr1 nor mrp mRNA levels were predictive for response to chemotherapy. In samples from patients who had received chemotherapy, those that had received mitoxantrone (n = 24) had higher lrp mRNA levels (mean 4.8, SD 2.5) than those that had not (n = 20, mean 2.8, SD 2.4, P = 0.012). In conclusion, the results indicate that lrp expression is associated with inferior response to chemotherapy in AML and that lrp expression increases after exposure to mitoxantrone.

Simultaneous Activity of MRP1 and Pgp Is Correlated With In Vitro Resistance to Daunorubicin and With In Vivo Resistance in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

In adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the weight of the contribution of the combined activity of Pgp and MRP1 to drug resistance is not known. To address this question, we compared the activity of these proteins to the in vitro resistance to daunorubicin (DNR), etoposide, and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), using the calcein-AM uptake and the 3-[4, 5-di-methyl-thiazol-2, 5-diphenyl] tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay in 80 adult AML patients. We found no correlation or only a weak correlation between the in vitro drug resistance to DNR and etoposide and MRP1 or Pgp expression or function when tested separately. However, a strong correlation was observed between the simultaneous activity of MRP1 and Pgp (quantified as the modulation of calcein-AM uptake by cyclosporin A and probenecid) and the LC50 of DNR (r = .77, P < .0001). This emphasized the role of these two proteins, not separately, but together in the resistance to DNR. In contrast, Mvp/LRP expression did not correlate with the LC50 of DNR. A high level of simultaneous activity of Pgp and MRP1 was predictive of a poor treatment outcome (for achievement of CR [P = .008], duration of relapse-free survival [RFS; P = .01], and duration of overall survival [OS; P = .02]). In addition, high LC50 of DNR and high LC50 of etoposide together were also predictive of a poor treatment outcome (for duration of RFS [P= .02] and duration of OS [P = .02]). The unfavorable cytogenetic category was more closely associated with the combined activity of both MRP1 and Pgp (P = .002) than with the activity of Pgp or MRP1 separately. This could explain the poor prognosis and the in vitro resistance to daunorubicin in this group of patients. These data suggest that treatment outcome may be improved when cellular DNR and etoposide resistance can be circumvented or modulated. Modulation of not only Pgp but also MRP1 could be essential to attain this aim in adult AML.

Tailoring the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

For younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia, the current priority is to prevent disease relapse. Intensification of induction has been shown to achieve this. Several randomized trials have been conducted to evaluate the role of autografting in acute myeloid leukemia. All trials reduce the risk of relapse but do not necessarily improve the survival, either because the competing effects of procedural mortality or salvage after relapse balance the benefits. Patients with different risk profiles may have different treatment plans. In older patients, progress is difficult to detect. Overcoming inherent drug resistance is of current interest, while improving supportive care by the routine use of growth factors has been disappointing.

Treatment of Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia With Combination Chemotherapy Plus the Multidrug Resistance Modulator PSC 833 (Valspodar)

A potential mechanism of chemotherapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the multidrug resistance (MDR-1) gene product P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which is often overexpressed in myeloblasts from refractory or relapsed AML. In a multicenter phase II clinical trial, 37 patients with these poor risk forms of AML were treated with PSC 833 (Valspodar; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ), a potent inhibitor of the MDR-1 efflux pump, plus mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (PSC-MEC). Pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions of etoposide and mitoxantrone with PSC were anticipated, measured in comparison with historical controls without PSC, and showed a 57% decrease in etoposide clearance (P = .001) and a 1.8-fold longer beta half-life for mitoxantrone in plasma (P < .05). The doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide were substantially reduced to compensate for these interactions and clinical toxicity and in Cohort II were well tolerated at dose levels of 4 mg/m2mitoxantrone, 40 mg/m2 etoposide, and 1 g/m2 C daily for 5 days. Overall, postchemotherapy marrow hypoplasia was achieved in 33 patients. Twelve patients (32%) achieved complete remission, four achieved partial remission, and 21 failed therapy. The PK observations correlated with enhanced toxicity. The probability of an infectious early death was 36% (4 of 11) in patients with high PK parameters for either drug versus 5% (1 of 20) in those with lower PK parameters (P = .04). P-gp function was assessed in 19 patients using rhodamine-123 efflux and its inhibition by PSC. The median percentage of blasts expressing P-gp was increased (49%) for leukemic cells with PSC-inhibitable rhodamine efflux compared with 17% in cases lacking PSC-inhibitable efflux (P = .004). PSC-MEC was relatively well tolerated in these patients with poor-risk AML, and had encouraging antileukemic effects. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group is currently testing this regimen versus standard MEC chemotherapy in a phase III trial, E2995, in a similar patient population.

Treatment of Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia With Combination Chemotherapy Plus the Multidrug Resistance Modulator PSC 833 (Valspodar)

A potential mechanism of chemotherapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the multidrug resistance (MDR-1) gene product P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which is often overexpressed in myeloblasts from refractory or relapsed AML. In a multicenter phase II clinical trial, 37 patients with these poor risk forms of AML were treated with PSC 833 (Valspodar; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ), a potent inhibitor of the MDR-1 efflux pump, plus mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (PSC-MEC). Pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions of etoposide and mitoxantrone with PSC were anticipated, measured in comparison with historical controls without PSC, and showed a 57% decrease in etoposide clearance (P = .001) and a 1.8-fold longer beta half-life for mitoxantrone in plasma (P &lt; .05). The doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide were substantially reduced to compensate for these interactions and clinical toxicity and in Cohort II were well tolerated at dose levels of 4 mg/m2mitoxantrone, 40 mg/m2 etoposide, and 1 g/m2 C daily for 5 days. Overall, postchemotherapy marrow hypoplasia was achieved in 33 patients. Twelve patients (32%) achieved complete remission, four achieved partial remission, and 21 failed therapy. The PK observations correlated with enhanced toxicity. The probability of an infectious early death was 36% (4 of 11) in patients with high PK parameters for either drug versus 5% (1 of 20) in those with lower PK parameters (P = .04). P-gp function was assessed in 19 patients using rhodamine-123 efflux and its inhibition by PSC. The median percentage of blasts expressing P-gp was increased (49%) for leukemic cells with PSC-inhibitable rhodamine efflux compared with 17% in cases lacking PSC-inhibitable efflux (P = .004). PSC-MEC was relatively well tolerated in these patients with poor-risk AML, and had encouraging antileukemic effects. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group is currently testing this regimen versus standard MEC chemotherapy in a phase III trial, E2995, in a similar patient population.

P-glycoprotein, lung resistance-related protein and multidrug resistance associated protein in de novo acute non-lymphocytic leukaemias: biological and clinical implications

P-glycoprotein (PGP), lung resistance-related protein (LRP) and multidrug resistance associated protein (MRP) expression and the blast cells' intracellular daunorubicin accumulation (IDA) were evaluated in 96 previously untreated cases of de novo acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia (ANLL). 47/96 patients (49%) were classified as PGP+ 44/ 96 (46%) as LRP+, and 8/96 (8%) as MRP+. The more frequent MDR clusters were PGP-/LRP-/MRP- (32/96 cases, 33%) and the PGP+/LRP+/MRP- (27/96 cases, 28%) followed by PGP+/LRP-/MRP- (15/96 cases, 16%) and PGP-/LRP+/MRP- (14/96 cases, 14%). A favourable karyotype was observed more frequently in PGP- and LRP-cases. A highly significant correlation was found between either PGP or LRP overexpression and leukaemic blast cell IDA. All the patients received standard induction and consolidation treatments containing MDR-related (idarubicin, mitoxantrone, etoposide) and other (arabinosyl cytosine) drugs. Multivariate analysis showed that PGP overexpression was significantly associated with a poor response to treatment, both in terms of primary resistance or shorter survival. Other independent prognostic factors were age and cytogenetics. LRP overexpression did not reach statistical significance, although for LRP+ cases the trend was unfavourable. Due to small numbers, no conclusion could be made regarding MRP overexpression, but 5/8 cases showed unfavourable karyotypic abnormalities, 8/8 had a defective IDA and 6/8 failed to achieve remission. This study showed that both PGP and LRP overexpression are common features in de novo ANLL at onset whereas MRP overexpression is more rare. It suggested that overexpression of one of the MDR related proteins was associated with a defective IDA, and confirmed that, in addition to age and cytogenetics, PGP retains an independent prognostic value. It also suggested that LRP did not affect clinical outcome when patients were treated with idarubicin or mitoxantrone and arabinosyl cytosine.

Tailoring the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

For younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the current priority is to prevent disease relapse. Intensification of induction has been shown to achieve this. Several randomized trials have been conducted to evaluate the role of autografting in AML. All trials reduce the risk of relapse but do not necessarily improve the survival, either because the competing effects of procedural mortality or salvage after relapse balance the benefits. Patients with different risk profiles may have different treatment plans. In older patients, progress is difficult to detect. Overcoming inherent drug resistance is of current interest, while improving supportive care by the routine use of growth factors has been disappointing.

Overexpression of lung-resistance protein and increased P-glycoprotein function in acute myeloid leukaemia cells predict a poor response to chemotherapy and reduced patient survival

We investigated the role of the drug resistance-related proteins LRP, MRP and Pgp and the apoptotic suppressor, bcl-2, in relation to other clinical characteristics, with respect to response and survival in 91 patients with newly diagnosed AML, treated with standard chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that poor response to chemotherapy was associated with increasing age (P=0.0004), LRP expression (P=0.0001) and Pgp function (P=0.015). The significant predictors of both leukaemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were LRP (LFS, P=0.01; OS, P=0.0001), Pgp function (LFS, P=0.0001; OS, P=0.0003) and cytogenetic abnormalities (LFS, P=0.0001; OS. P=0.0005). Patients with the lowest expression of LRP and Pgp function and favourable karyotype (group I) had an LFS of 30.2 months compared to 8 5 months in the group with the highest expression of LRP and Pgp and poor prognosis karyotype (group III, P=0.002). OS decreased from 75.4 months in group I to 7.9 months in group III patients (P <0.0001). Neither MRP nor bcl-2 were significantly associated with chemotherapy response and survival. Correlations were found between increasing expression of LRP and older age (P=0.05) and an unfavourable karyotype (P=0.005), but these variables were independent of each other in analysis of treatment response and patient survival. Our findings suggest that both LRP and Pgp are clinically relevant drug-resistance proteins and it may be necessary to modulate both LRP and Pgp functions in order to reverse the multidrug resistance phenotype in AML.