Lamivudine/dolutegravir dual therapy in HIV-infected, virologically suppressed patients

Retrospective study on the outcome of two-drug regimens based on dolutegravir plus one reverse transcriptase inhibitor in virologically-suppressed HIV-infected patients

This was a retrospective study on the efficacy and drug resistance mutations selected at virological failure (VF) in prospectively-followed HIV-infected patients switched to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine (DTG+RPV) or lamivudine (DTG+3TC) while virologically suppressed (HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL). VF was defined as HIV-RNA >50 copies/mL in two consecutive determinations or in a single determination if followed by treatment modification, or >1000 copies/mL in a single determination. Totally, 374 patients were analysed (307 switched to DTG+3TC and 67 to DTG+RPV); 220 had documented historical resistance. The median (IQR) time with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL before switch was 4.52 (1.93-8.14) years. VF occurred in 17 patients after a median of 1.74 (0.90-2.46) years of follow-up in the 3TC group [incidence rate (95% CI) 3.34 (2.08-5.37) per 100-PYFU] and in 2 patients after a median of 1.78 (1.10-2.99) years of follow-up in the RPV group [incidence rate (95% CI) 1.57 (0.4-6.28) per 100-PYFU]. The 48-week estimated probabilities to maintain virological suppression during treatment with a two-drug regimen were 97.8% (95% CI 95.1-99.0%) vs. 98.3% (95% CI 88.6-99.8%) in the 3TC versus RPV group (P = 0.311). At switch, patients with VF had undetectable HIV-RNA since 0.71 (0.23-1.07) years versus 1.49 (0.64-2.2) years in those without VF (P = 0.001). In the 3TC group, VF was not associated with the presence of historical resistance to nucleoside analogues, and DTG-resistant variants were not selected at VF. One VF to DTG+RPV occurred because of historical resistance to RPV, accompanied by newly selected G140A and Q148R mutations. VF was infrequent with these regimens and was negatively associated with duration of viral undetectability. Drug resistance mutations selected at failure of these regimens were those expected in case of failure of any regimen including DTG, 3TC or RPV, but the impact of resistance to NRTIs on efficacy of DTG+3TC seems lower than expected.

Uptake and effectiveness of two-drug compared with three-drug antiretroviral regimens among HIV-positive individuals in Europe

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of two-drug antiretroviral regimens (2DR) and virologic and immunologic outcomes compared with three-drug regimens (3DR) in the EuroSIDA cohort.

DESIGN

Multicentre, prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Logistic regression was used to analyse the uptake and outcomes among HIV-positive individuals who started or switched to a 2DR compared with those on a 3DR. Virologic outcomes were assessed on-treatment as the proportion of individuals with controlled viral load (<400 copies/ml), or with a composite modified FDA snapshot endpoint (mFDA), with mFDA success defined as controlled viral load at 6 months or 12 months for individuals with a known viral load, no regimen changes, AIDS or death. Immunologic response was defined as a 100 cells/μl or a 25% increase in CD4 cell counts from baseline.

RESULTS

Between 1 July 2010 and 31 December 2016, 423 individuals started or switched to a 2DR (eight antiretroviral-naive) and 4347 started a 3DR (566 naive). Individuals on 2DR tended to have suppressed viral load, higher CD4 cell counts and more comorbidities at baseline compared with those on 3DR. There were no differences in the proportions of individuals who obtained on-treatment or mFDA success, and no significant differences in the adjusted odds ratios for mFDA success or immunologic responses between the 2DR and 3DR groups at 6 months or 12 months.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, 2DR were largely used for virologically suppressed individuals with higher cumulative exposure to antiretrovirals and comorbidities. Virologic and immunologic outcomes were similar among those on 2DR or 3DR, although confounding by indication cannot be fully excluded due to the observational nature of the study.

Dolutegravir-based maintenance monotherapy versus dual therapy with lamivudine: a planned 24 week analysis of the DOLAM randomized clinical trial

Background

No controlled comparisons between dolutegravir/lamivudine or dolutegravir maintenance therapy have been done. We hypothesized that these options would have similar efficacy to triple ART.

Methods

We used an open-label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comprising two phases: phase A was established to test that experimental arms did not have an unacceptable (≥5%) failure rate; phase B was intended to include the full number of patients followed for 48 weeks. Treated HIV-1-infected adults with viral load <50 copies/mL for ≥12 months, no prior viral failure or resistance mutations to study drugs, nadir CD4 >200 cells/mm3, and hepatitis B virus surface antigen negative were randomized 1:1:1 to maintain triple therapy (control arm), or to switch to dolutegravir/lamivudine, or to dolutegravir monotherapy stratifying by anchor drug. Premature discontinuation was considered if viral failure or therapy interruption due to adverse events, concurrent illness, protocol deviation or patient's wish occurred. Blips were registered. Planned phase A results at 24 weeks are reported here. The study is registered at EudraCT: 201500027435.

Results

Ninety-one (control, n = 31; dual therapy, n = 29; monotherapy, n = 31) patients were randomized. Three patients (none previously exposed to integrase inhibitors) prematurely discontinued treatment due to viral failure: dolutegravir/lamivudine (n = 1), no resistance mutations (subject A); dolutegravir (n = 2), N155H, S147G and Q148R resistance mutations (subject B), and E138K, G140S and N155H resistance mutations (subject C). There were no discontinuations for other reasons. One patient (dolutegravir/lamivudine) experienced a blip in viral load. The Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended stopping the dolutegravir monotherapy arm.

Conclusions

In contrast to dolutegravir/lamivudine, a higher than expected risk of viral failure with development of cross-resistance integrase mutations occurred with dolutegravir maintenance monotherapy.

Long-term data on the efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in a multi-centre cohort of HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed patients

BACKGROUND

Results from clinical trials and observational studies suggest that lamivudine plus dolutegravir (3TC+DTG) could be an effective and tolerated option for simplification in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-positive patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study enrolled HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed patients switching to 3TC+DTG. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was performed to evaluate time to virological failure (VF; defined by a single HIV-RNA determination ≥1000 copies/mL or by two consecutive HIV-RNA determinations ≥50 copies/mL) and time to treatment discontinuation (TD; defined as interruption of either 3TC or DTG), Cox regression was performed to assess predictors, and linear mixed model was performed for repeated measures to measure changes in immunological and metabolic parameters.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-six patients were eligible for analysis. Their median CD4+ count at baseline was 668 cells/mm³ and median time of virological suppression was 88 months. Estimated probabilities of maintaining virological suppression at 96 and 144 weeks of follow-up were 97.5% [standard deviation (SD) 0.8] and 96.5% (SD 1.0), respectively. Years since HIV diagnosis was the only predictor of VF. In patients with time of virological suppression <88 months, the rate of VF was higher in the presence of the M184V mutation. Estimated probabilities of remaining on 3TC+DTG at 96 and 144 weeks of follow-up were 79.2% (SD 1.9) and 75.2% (SD 2.2), respectively. A significant increase in CD4 cell count (+44 cells/mm³, P=0.015), CD4/CD8 ratio (+0.10, P=0.002) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+5.4 mg/dL, P=0.036) was found at 144 weeks of follow-up; meanwhile, total cholesterol (-9.1 mg/dL, P=0.007) and triglycerides (-2.7, P=0.009) decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the efficacy and tolerability of 3TC+DTG in virologically suppressed patients.

Two-drug regimens with dolutegravir plus rilpivirine or lamivudine in HIV-1 treatment-naïve, virologically-suppressed patients: Latest evidence from the literature on their efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVES

In the HIV-1-positive population, a paradigm shift from three-drug regimens (3DRs) to dolutegravir-based two-drug regimens (2DRs) both as initial and switch treatment is beginning to take place, supported virologically by the availability of new potent drugs with high genetic barrier to overcome, at least in certain conditions, the dogma of 3DRs in effective HIV-1 therapy. This manuscript reviews the increasing evidence on their excellent and sustained long-term effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

This review includes the most recent results on dolutegravir plus rilpivirine or lamivudine 2DRs from randomised clinical trials, meta-analyses and real-life studies, including relevant data presented at international conferences up to August 2019.

RESULTS

As an initial treatment strategy, dolutegravir plus lamivudine showed high efficacy and safety over 96 weeks in 1441 patients from the GEMINI-1&2 phase III non-inferiority trials. In the SWORD 1&2 trials in virologically-suppressed patients, switching to once-daily dolutegravir plus rilpivirine maintained efficacy over 148 weeks. Similarly, in the TANGO trial, no confirmed virological withdrawals were observed with dolutegravir/lamivudine through Week 48. Consistent results were observed in real-life cohorts. No emergent dolutegravir-resistant virus has ever been reported in a patient in whom dolutegravir was prescribed in the context of such 2DRs. Switching to once-daily dolutegravir plus rilpivirine or lamivudine was generally well tolerated and was associated with favourable renal and bone safety.

CONCLUSION

The results available so far support dolutegravir-based 2DRs as excellent treatment options for adults with HIV-1 infection, either naïve or already virologically suppressed on their current antiretroviral regimen.

Dual therapy with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) plus lamivudine versus triple therapy with ritonavir-boosted PI plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitor in HIV-infected patients with viral suppression

BACKGROUND

Dual antiretroviral regimens are attractive options to optimize the combination antiretroviral therapy in light of potential toxicities with long-term cumulative exposure to nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we included HIV-infected patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy with plasma viral load (PVL) < 200 copies/mL for at least 6 months who were switched to dual regimens containing lamivudine (3TC) (150 mg twice daily or 300 mg once daily) plus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 250/50 mg twice daily or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily. Patients maintaining on suppressive triple therapy with DRV/r or LPV/r plus two NRTIs were included for comparisons. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with PVL <50 copies/mL after 48 weeks of follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 364 patients were included with 93 (25.5%) switched to dual therapy After 48 weeks of observation, PVL <50 copies/mL was observed in 96.8% and 94.1% of dual-therapy and triple-therapy group, respectively, in per-protocol analysis (difference 2.7%; 95% CI -2.5%-7.9%). Nineteen patients (3 [3.2%] in dual-therapy and 16 [7.6%] in triple-therapy group) developed virologic failure, with none having emergent M184V resistance-associated mutation. A statistically significant increase of cholesterol level (13 mg/dL versus 2 mg/dL, p = 0.003) and high-density lipoprotein (3 mg/dL versus -2 mg/dL, p = 0.019) were observed in dual-therapy than in triple-therapy group. Changes of triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein and glycated hemoglobin levels were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Dual therapy with DRV/r or LPV/r plus lamivudine demonstrated similar effectiveness in maintaining viral suppression to triple therapy.

DOLAMA study: Effectiveness, safety and pharmacoeconomic analysis of dual therapy with dolutegravir and lamivudine in virologically suppressed HIV-1 patients

Dolutegravir (DTG) has shown effectiveness in combination with rilpivirine in with experience of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and with 3TC in naïve patients (GEMINI trial). The main objectives of this real-life study were to analyze the effectiveness and safety of 3TC plus DTG in virologically suppressed HIV-1 patients and to conduct a pharmacoeconomic analysis.We conducted an observational, retrospective and multicenter study of HIV+ patients pretreated for at least 6 months with ART that was then simplified to 3TC + DTG for any reason. We gathered data on viral loads (VLs) during exposure to the DT, calculating the rate with VL < 50 copies/mL at week 48, and on associated adverse effects.The 177 HIV+ patients were collected, 77.4% male, with average age of 48.5 years and mean count of 252.2cell/μL CD4+ nadir lymphocytes; 96.6% had VL < 50 copies/mL and 674 cells/μL CD4+ lymphocytes. Median time since HIV diagnosis was 15 years, and median ART duration was 13 years, and 34.5% of patients were on mono- or dual-therapy before the switch. At week 48, 82.4% of patients had VL < 50 cop/μL using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 89.6% according to mITT, and 96.7% according to Per-Protocol analysis. 3.3% patients had virological failure (VF). These effectiveness data and costs were compared with those for 2 reference triple therapies (DTG/ABC/3TC and EVG/cobi/FTC/TAF) in a cost minimization analysis, showing cost savings with administration of DTG+3TC (2741 &OV0556;/year vs DTG/ABC/3TC and 4164 &OV0556;/year vs EVG/cobi/FTC/TAF) and in a cost-effectiveness analysis, finding the DT to be the most cost-effective approach (ICER = -548 vs DTG/ABC/3TC and ICER = -4,627&OV0556; vs EVG/cobi/FTC/TAF)The combination of 3TC with DTG appears to be a safe and effective option for the simplification of ART in pretreated and virologically stable HIV-positive patients, being cost-effective and offering the same effectiveness as the triple therapy it replaces.

Switch to dolutegravir and unboosted atazanavir in HIV-1 infected patients with undetectable viral load and long exposure to antiretroviral therapy

: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a two-drug regimen including dolutegravir (DTG) and unboosted atazanavir (uATV) in 151 HIV-1 infected patients with HIV-RNA of more than 50 copies/ml. During a median follow-up of 62 (42-97) weeks, two virological failures (1%) and 13 treatment discontinuations (9%) occurred; the 48-week probability of virological failure was 0.8% (95% confidence interval 0.2-5.6%). Switch to DTG + uATV may represent a boosting and transcriptase reverse inhibitors sparing otion in individuals with long exposure to antiretroviral therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease.

Integrase Inhibitors: After 10 Years of Experience, Is the Best Yet to Come?

The era of the integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection began with raltegravir in 2007. Since that time, several other INSTIs have been introduced including elvitegravir, dolutegravir, and, most recently, bictegravir, that have shown great utility as part of antiretroviral regimens in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. At present, antiretroviral guidelines fully endorse the INSTI class as part of all first-line treatment regimens. After 10 years of experience with INSTIs, newer agents are on the horizon such as cabotegravir and MK-2048 for potential use as either HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis or maintenance therapy. This review provides a brief overview of the INSTI class including agents currently available and those still in development, reviews available data from both completed and ongoing clinical trials, and outlines simplification strategies using INSTIs.

No Significant Changes to Residual Viremia After Switch to Dolutegravir and Lamivudine in a Randomized Trial

In the ASPIRE trial, antiretroviral therapy (ART) switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG+3TC) was comparable to 3-drug ART in maintaining viral suppression by standard viral load assays. We used an ultrasensitive assay to assess whether this switch led to increased residual viremia. At entry, levels of residual viremia did not differ significantly between arms (DTG+3TC vs 3-drug ART: mean, 5.0 vs 4.2 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL; P = .64). After randomization, no significant between-group differences were found at either week 24 or 48. These results show no evidence for increased viral replication on DTG+3TC and support its further investigation as a dual ART strategy.

Efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine plus dolutegravir compared with lamivudine plus boosted PIs in HIV-1 positive individuals with virologic suppression: a retrospective study from the clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Direct comparisons between lamivudine plus bPIs and lamivudine plus dolutegravir as maintenance strategies in virologically-suppressed HIV positive patients are lacking.

METHODS

Time to treatment discontinuation (TD) and virological failure (VF) were compared in a cohort of HIV+ patients on a virologically-effective ART starting lamivudine with either darunavir/r, atazanavir/r or dolutegravir. Changes in laboratory parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Four-hundred-ninety-four patients were analyzed (170 switching to darunavir/r, 141 to atazanavir/r, 183 to dolutegravir): median age was 49 years, with 8 years since ART start. Groups differed for age, HIV-risk factor, time since HIV-diagnosis and on ART, previous therapy and reasons for switching. Estimated proportions free from TD at week 48 and 96 were 79.8 and 48.3% of patients with darunavir/r, 87.0 and 70.9% with atazanavir/r, and 88.2 and 82.6% with dolutegravir, respectively (p < 0.001). Calendar years, HIV-risk factor, higher baseline cholesterol and an InSTI-based previous regimen predicted TD, whereas lamivudine+dolutegravir therapy and previous tenofovir use were protective. VF was the cause of TD in 6/123 cases with darunavir/r, 4/97 with atazanavir/r and 3/21 with dolutegravir. Other main reasons for TD were: toxicity (43.1% with darunavir/r, 39.2% with atazanavir/r, 52.4% with dolutegravir), further simplification (36.6% with darunavir/r, 30.9% with atazanavir/r, 14.3% with dolutegravir). Incidence of VF did not differ among study groups (p = 0.747). No factor could predict VF. Lipid profile improved in the dolutegravir group, whereas renal function improved in the bPIs groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In real practice, a switch to lamivudine+dolutegravir showed similar efficacy but longer durability than a switch to lamivudine+bPIs.

Simplification of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and the brain-a real-life experience

Modern antiretroviral combination therapy (cART) has transformed HIV from a life-threatening infection into a chronic disease. However, the life-long treatment has side effects that frequently have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Thus, there are some efforts to "simplify" therapy, i.e. apply regimens with three or fewer antiretroviral substances. However, neurologists are relatively sceptical towards this cART "simplification", because the capacity of simplified regimens to access the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) might be too weak to effectively suppress viral load in this compartment. Thus, data of a big Neuro-AIDS cohort of 4992 HIV-positive patients consecutively recruited over three decades were retrospectively analysed in terms of neurocognitive performance of patients switched to simplified therapy regimens. To test whether simplified drug regimens result in new neuropsychological deficits or the worsening of pre-existing ones in HIV+ patients. Three groups of HIV+ patients were switched from triple therapy to three different two drug regimens (n = 177 to lamivudine/PI, n = 37 to INI/PI, and n = 303 to dual PI); three other groups of patients put from one to an alternative triple combination (n = 290 ABC/3TC/PI, n = 244 TDF/FTC/PI, and n = 158 TDF/FTC/NNRTI) for whatever reason served as controls. All patients were followed up over 4 years maximum. Every patient group improved immunologically and virologically after the switch. However, patients who switched to INI/PI combinations remained stable in neuropsychological tests, while a considerable percentage of patients who switched to other treatments demonstrated a decline. Remarkably, a high percentage of the patients switched to "simplified drug regimens" was not well-controlled virologically before the switch. HIV-positive patients with simplified therapy regimens show some benefit in terms of systemic infection surrogate markers (CD4 ± cell count and plasma viral load); however, neurocognitive deficits do not improve, but remain stable in most cases.

Effectiveness of dolutegravir-based regimens as either first-line or switch antiretroviral therapy: data from the Icona cohort

INTRODUCTION

Concerns about dolutegravir (DTG) tolerability in the real-life setting have recently arisen. We aimed to estimate the risk of treatment discontinuation and virological failure of DTG-based regimens from a large cohort of HIV-infected individuals.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, observational study including all antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and virologically suppressed treatment-experienced (TE) patients from the Icona (Italian Cohort Naïve Antiretrovirals) cohort who started, for the first time, a DTG-based regimen from January 2015 to December 2017. We estimated the cumulative risk of DTG discontinuation regardless of the reason and for toxicity, and of virological failure using Kaplan-Meier curves. We used Cox regression model to investigate predictors of DTG discontinuation.

RESULTS

About 1679 individuals (932 ART-naïve, 747 TE) were included. The one- and two-year probabilities (95% CI) of DTG discontinuation were 6.7% (4.9 to 8.4) and 11.5% (8.7 to 14.3) for ART-naïve and 6.6% (4.6 to 8.6) and 7.6% (5.4 to 9.8) for TE subjects. In both ART-naïve and TE patients, discontinuations of DTG were mainly driven by toxicity with an estimated risk (95% CI) of 4.0% (2.6 to 5.4) and 2.5% (1.3 to 3.6) by one year and 5.6% (3.8 to 7.5) and 4.0% (2.4 to 5.6) by two years respectively. Neuropsychiatric events were the main reason for stopping DTG in both ART-naïve (2.1%) and TE (1.7%) patients. In ART-naïve, a concomitant AIDS diagnosis predicted the risk of discontinuing DTG for any reason (adjusted relative hazard (aRH) = 3.38, p = 0.001), whereas starting DTG in combination with abacavir (ABC) was associated with a higher risk of discontinuing because of toxicity (aRH = 3.30, p = 0.009). TE patients starting a DTG-based dual therapy compared to a triple therapy had a lower risk of discontinuation for any reason (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 2.50, p = 0.037 for ABC-based triple-therapies, aHR = 3.56, p = 0.012 for tenofovir-based) and for toxicity (aHR = 5.26, p = 0.030 for ABC-based, aHR = 6.60, p = 0.024 for tenofovir-based). The one- and two-year probabilities (95% CI) of virological failure were 1.2% (0.3 to 2.0) and 4.6% (2.7 to 6.5) in the ART naïve group and 2.2% (1.0 to 3.3) and 2.9% (1.5 to 4.3) in the TE group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, DTG showed excellent efficacy and optimal tolerability both as first-line and switching ART. The low risk of treatment-limiting toxicities in ART-naïve as well as in treated individuals reassures on the use of DTG in everyday clinical practice.

Optimizing Antiretroviral Therapy in Treatment-Experienced Patients Living with HIV: A Critical Review of Switch and Simplification Strategies. An Opinion of the HIV Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy

Simplifying or switching antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) may improve adherence, tolerability, toxicities, and/or drug-drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the literature for efficacy and safety associated with switching or simplifying ART in treatment-experienced PLWH. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE was performed from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2018. References within articles of interest, the Department of Health and Human Services guidelines, and conference abstracts were also reviewed. Switch/simplification strategies were categorized as those supported by high-level clinical evidence and those with emerging data. Rates of virologic suppression were noninferior for several switch/simplification strategies when compared to baseline ART. Potential for reducing adverse events was also seen. Additional evidence for some strategies, including most 2-drug regimens, is needed before they can be recommended.

Systematic De-escalation of Successful Triple Antiretroviral Therapy to Dual Therapy with Dolutegravir plus Emtricitabine or Lamivudine in Swiss HIV-positive Persons

BACKGROUND

Studies increasingly suggest that the efficacy of certain dual antiretroviral therapy (ART) combinations is equal to triple ART. Increasing concerns among HIV-positive patients and physicians in Switzerland include ART cost and long-term ART safety and toxicity, i.e. taking only as many ART agents as necessary. The aims of this retrospective analysis are to report on the de-escalation of our entire clinic population of eligible patients with well-controlled HIV-infection to dolutegravir-containing dual ART.

METHODS

Starting in March 2015, we systematically considered the de-escalation of eligible patients to either dolutegravir/emtricitabine or dolutegravir/lamivudine, by discontinuing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abacavir. We report on the virological efficacy, tolerability and patient satisfaction ≥ 48 weeks after de-escalation.

FINDINGS

Of 106 HIV-positive patients followed in our clinic, 70 patients were de-escalated. Three returned to triple ART (insomnia after dolutegravir start, n = 2; new wish for single tablet regimen, n = 1). All de-escalated patients and all who continued triple ART had suppressed HIV viremia at last follow-up and were satisfied with their ART regimen, except for one patient who had virological failure after ART discontinuation in the setting of major depression. The most common reasons to not de-escalate included hepatitis B co-infection (n = 6), physician's concern about ART adherence (n = 6), patient reluctance to switch from a single tablet to a 2-tablet regimen (n = 7), patient satisfied with current ART (n = 5) and others (n = 12).

INTERPRETATION

ART de-escalation to dolutegravir/FTC or dolutegravir/3TC is possible in the majority of patients virologically suppressed on triple ART, and may effectively address patient and physician concerns about long-term safety and cost of ART.

Virologic failure and HIV drug resistance on simplified, dolutegravir-based maintenance therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Dolutegravir-containing maintenance therapy is a promising simplification strategy for virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals. However, most of the available data to inform this strategy come from small, uncontrolled studies. We estimated the proportion of HIV-infected patients experiencing virological failure (VF) and developing drug resistance on dolutegravir (DTG)-based maintenance therapy. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and conference abstracts for studies assessing VF on DTG-based maintenance therapy. Studies including ≥5 adults with an undetectable viral load on antiretroviral therapy (ART) who switched to a DTG-based mono- or dual therapy were included. Pooled proportions of VF were estimated using random-intercept logistic meta-regression and acquired drug resistance mutations described for each strategy. Results: Of 1719 studies considered, 21 met our selection criteria, including seven interventional and 14 observational studies. Eight studies including 251 patients assessed VF on DTG monotherapy and fourteen studies including 1670 participants VF on dual therapy. The participant's median age ranged from 43 to 63 years, their median nadir CD4 count from 90 to 399 cells/µl, and 27.6% were female. The proportion of participants experiencing VF on DTG-monotherapy was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.7) at 24 weeks and 8.9% (95% CI 4.7-16.2) at 48 weeks. Resistance mutations developed in seven (3.6%) participants on DTG-monotherapy. Among patients on dual therapy, ten (0.7%, 95% CI 0.4-1.3) experienced VF by 48 weeks and none developed resistance to DTG. In adjusted analyses, VF at 24 weeks was less likely on dual therapy than on monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.30). Conclusions: Whereas VF is relatively common on DTG maintenance monotherapy, DTG-based dual therapy appears to be a promising simplification strategy for individuals with a suppressed HIV viral load on triple-ART.

Virologic failure and HIV drug resistance on simplified, dolutegravir-based maintenance therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Dolutegravir-containing maintenance therapy is a promising simplification strategy for virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals. However, most of the available data to inform this strategy come from small, uncontrolled studies. We estimated the proportion of HIV-infected patients experiencing virological failure (VF) and developing drug resistance on dolutegravir (DTG)-based maintenance therapy. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and conference abstracts for studies assessing VF on DTG-based maintenance therapy. Studies including ≥5 adults with an undetectable viral load on antiretroviral therapy (ART) who switched to a DTG-based mono- or dual therapy were included. Pooled proportions of VF were estimated using random-intercept logistic meta-regression and acquired drug resistance mutations described for each strategy. Results: Of 1719 studies considered, 21 met our selection criteria, including seven interventional and 14 observational studies. Eight studies including 251 patients assessed VF on DTG monotherapy and fourteen studies including 1670 participants VF on dual therapy. The participant's median age ranged from 43 to 63 years, their median nadir CD4 count from 90 to 399 cells/µl, and 27.6% were female. The proportion of participants experiencing VF on DTG-monotherapy was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.7) at 24 weeks and 8.9% (95% CI 4.7-16.2) at 48 weeks. Resistance mutations developed in seven (3.6%) participants on DTG-monotherapy. Among patients on dual therapy, ten (0.7%, 95% CI 0.4-1.3) experienced VF by 48 weeks and none developed resistance to DTG. In adjusted analyses, VF at 24 weeks was less likely on dual therapy than on monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.30). Conclusions: Whereas VF is relatively common on DTG maintenance monotherapy, DTG-based dual therapy appears to be a promising simplification strategy for individuals with a suppressed HIV viral load on triple-ART.

Dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimens after receiving raltegravir (RAL) or elvitegravir (EVG): Durability and virological response in a large Italian HIV drug resistance network (ARCA)

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir (DTG) is a next-generation HIV integrase inhibitor (INI) with an increased genetic barrier to resistance with respect to raltegravir (RAL) or elvitegravir (EVG). Few data are available on the durability of DTG-containing regimens.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed at investigating the duration of the DTG-containing regimen, the occurrence of an HIV-1 RNA blip, and factors associated with DTG virological response.

STUDY DESIGN

From the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis database, we selected 89 HIV-1-positive four-class-experienced subjects who started DTG after receiving RAL or EVG. Factors associated with durability and virological response were analysed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

After a median duration of 18.8 [0.4-76.2] months, 79/89 (88.8%) subjects were still on DTG. All subjects remaining on DTG at the end of follow-up had undetectable HIV-1 RNA, compared to 5/10 subjects who discontinued DTG. DTG discontinuation was less frequent in patients who had experienced ≥10 regimens (HR 0.11, p = 0.040). The probability of having an HIV-1 RNA positive value at the last follow-up significantly increased in patients with non-B HIV-1 subtype (HR 5.77, p < .001) and significantly decreased in patients with CD4 nadir >200/μL (HR 0.29, p = 0.038), with more than 10 previous regimens (HR 0.27, p = 0.040), and who harbored virus with IN mutations (HR 0.12, p = 0.023) at DTG start.

CONCLUSIONS

After previous exposure to first-generation INIs, treatment with DTG showed long durability and did not show virological rebound after virological suppression. Subjects infected with a non-B HIV-1 subtype had a greater risk of having detectable HIV-1 RNA at the last observation.

Efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in a multicentre cohort of patients with suppressed HIV-1 replication

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine + dolutegravir in a cohort of HIV-1 infected, treatment-experienced patients with undetectable HIV-RNA.

METHODS

Time to treatment discontinuation (TD) and virological failure (VF) and their predictors were assessed in a multicenter cohort of HIV-1 infected patients, starting lamivudine + dolutegravir after reaching viral suppression. Secondary objective was the evaluation of changes in lipid profile, renal and immunological functions at week 48.

RESULTS

We enrolled 206 patients (72.8% male, with 51 years median age), who mainly switched their antiretroviral therapy for simplification (32.5%) or drug toxicity (54.5%). The estimated probability of maintaining virological suppression at 48 and 96 weeks was 98.2% and 95.1%, respectively. VF was independently predicted by cumulative time on antiretroviral therapy. The estimated probability of remaining on lamivudine plus dolutegravir was 86.7% and 80.5% at week 48 and 96, respectively. A significant improvement in immunological function (CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio) was evidenced at week 48, as well as a decrease in total cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine plus dolutegravir was effective in maintaining viral suppression in our cohort and led to an improvement in metabolic and immunologic functions.

Dolutegravir Dual Therapy as Maintenance Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients: A Review

OBJECTIVE

To review available evidence for dolutegravir-based dual therapy as maintenance treatment in HIV-1 infected patients.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar to the end of January 2018. Conference abstracts and article bibliographies were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language, randomized, and observational studies were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In all, 12 studies were identified: 10 were observational, and 2 were randomized trials. Rilpivirine or lamivudine were the most common second agent used in combination with dolutegravir. Virological suppression seen in observational studies appear promising; however, the most compelling evidence to date is the 48-week results from 2 large open-label randomized trials (SWORD 1 and 2). These studies found that dual therapy with rilpivirine and dolutegravir was noninferior to 3- or 4-drug combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dual therapy, as compared with usual cART, are less clear and require further data.

CONCLUSIONS

Regimen switching in virally suppressed HIV-1-infected patients may be considered to reduce pill burden or dosing frequency, decrease short- or long-term toxicity, prevent or manage drug-drug interactions, and/or decrease cost. Based on available evidence, a switch to dual therapy with dolutegravir and rilpivirine appears viable for virologically suppressed patients without prior resistance mutations to these agents. Randomized studies of other dual-therapy regimens that include dolutegravir and longer-term follow-up as well as cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to provide confirmation that this strategy offers advantages to traditional cART regimens.

HIV evolution and diversity in ART-treated patients

Characterizing HIV genetic diversity and evolution during antiretroviral therapy (ART) provides insights into the mechanisms that maintain the viral reservoir during ART. This review describes common methods used to obtain and analyze intra-patient HIV sequence data, the accumulation of diversity prior to ART and how it is affected by suppressive ART, the debate on viral replication and evolution in the presence of ART, HIV compartmentalization across various tissues, and mechanisms for the emergence of drug resistance. It also describes how CD4+ T cells that were likely infected with latent proviruses prior to initiating treatment can proliferate before and during ART, providing a renewable source of infected cells despite therapy. Some expanded cell clones carry intact and replication-competent proviruses with a small fraction of the clonal siblings being transcriptionally active and a source for residual viremia on ART. Such cells may also be the source for viral rebound after interrupting ART. The identical viral sequences observed for many years in both the plasma and infected cells of patients on long-term ART are likely due to the proliferation of infected cells both prior to and during treatment. Studies on HIV diversity may reveal targets that can be exploited in efforts to eradicate or control the infection without ART.

Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of a Switch to Dual Therapy with Dolutegravir Plus Cobicistat-Boosted Darunavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

BACKGROUND

Dual regimen with dolutegravir plus cobicistat-boosted darunavir (DTG/DRV/c) is reasonable alternative option for patients with existing resistance and/or intolerance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients who switched to DTG/DRV/c among treatment-experienced patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in a tertiary university hospital were selected. We analyzed the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability based on serial laboratory data and clinical findings. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL at week 48 after switch. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were retrospectively analyzed. The main reasons for the change to DTG/DRV/c were treatment failure in 13 patients (41.9%), simplification in 12 patients (38.7%), and adverse drug reaction in 6 patients (19.4%). Among the 13 patients who switched owing to treatment failure, the proportion of patients in whom the viral loads were suppressed to less than 50 copies/mL increased from 0% at baseline to 45% at 4 weeks, 50% at 12 weeks, 50% at 24 weeks, and 66.7% at 48 weeks. HIV virus levels decreased and CD4⁺ T cell counts increased during the follow-up period. In non-treatment failure patients (18 patients), the levels of viral suppression and CD4⁺ T cells were maintained. There were no significant differences in renal function, liver function, glucose levels, and lipid profile before and after regimen changes. The tolerability was very good: 30 patients (96.8%) tolerated the drugs well and only 1 patient discontinued owing to no improvement in renal insufficiency. Two patients (6.4%) in treatment failure group failed to reach viral suppression.

CONCLUSION

The use of DTG/DRV/c in HIV treatment-experienced patients appears to be a very good regimen for switch therapy that is effective and well tolerated, without significant adverse drug reaction.

Dolutegravir plus rilpivirine dual therapy in treating HIV-1 infection

INTRODUCTION

The HIV-infected population is aging and comorbidities and polypharmacological regimens are increasing. To reduce toxicity and drug burden researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety and durability of dual therapies as a switch option in subjects who have achieved stable virologic suppression. Initially effective dual combinations relied on protease inhibitors but when dolutegravir, the first integrase inhibitor to display a high genetic barrier, became commercially available, many physicians began to use it in a variety of dual regimens, generating several observational cohorts. Areas covered: This review covers the most recent data from observational cohorts and randomized clinical trials concerning the switch to the dual combination of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine and the reasons that lead to consider this option. Also, viral failures, due to poor adherence or to other factors, and drug resistance are investigated. Articles which are searchable on MEDLINE/PubMed and from the main national/international congresses in the field of HIV therapy are reviewed. Expert opinion: The observation period for this regimen is getting longer and data showing its efficacy in maintaining HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL are now consolidated. Metabolic data suggest some benefit in the lipid profile, improvement in bone mineral density and reduced bone reabsorption.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV

INTRODUCTION

The search for simple, potent, metabolic-friendly and nucleoside/nucleotide sparing antiretroviral regimens has led clinical investigators to move steps towards dual therapies. Among these the association of rilpivirine and dolutegravir is emerging as a twin randomized clinical trial (SWORD1&2) and at least three observational cohort describe it as a safe and highly effective regimen for switch from other therapies Areas covered: We review the evidence supporting the use of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV in virologically suppressed patients taking other antiretroviral regimens. The reasons for the switch in clinical practice may range from simplification to tolerability/toxicity issues, to the prevention of future metabolic damage, to predicted drug-drug interactions when treatment of HCV co-infection is planned. Articles searchable on MEDLINE/PubMed and from the main international congresses in the field of HIV therapy were reviewed to provide context for use of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine Expert opinion: This treatment is highly effective in maintaining HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Although the studies up to date requested patient to switch to drugs they had no experience of, a predictable 'radical change' effect did not impact negatively on the results. Further data from these studies may help elucidate the possible advantage in terms of safety and metabolic effect in the next few months.