Analysing the efficacy and tolerability of dolutegravir plus either rilpivirine or lamivudine in a multicentre cohort of virologically suppressed PLWHIV

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of two dolutegravir-based two-drug regimens: dolutegravir + lamivudine versus dolutegravir + rilpivirine.

METHODS

We analysed a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) switching to dolutegravir + lamivudine or dolutegravir + rilpivirine. We excluded from the analysis PLWHIV with no available pre-switch genotypic test or with a known resistance mutation to one of the study drugs. We evaluated incidence of virological failure (VF) and treatment discontinuation (TD), as well as changes in immunological and metabolic parameters.

RESULTS

We enrolled 592 PLWHIV: 306 in the lamivudine group and 286 in the rilpivirine group. We observed nine VFs in the lamivudine group [1.4 VF per 100 patient-years of follow-up (PYFU)] and four VFs in the rilpivirine group (0.6 VF per 100 PYFU). Subsequent genotypic analysis showed no acquired resistance-associated mutations in those experiencing VF. Estimated probability of maintaining virological suppression at 144 and 240 weeks were 96.6% and 92.7%, respectively, in the lamivudine group and 98.7% and 98.7%, respectively, in the rilpivirine group (log-rank P = 0.172). The estimated probability of maintaining study regimen at Week 240 was 82.3% in the lamivudine group and 85.9% in the rilpivirine group (log-rank P = 0.018). We observed a significant improvement in CD4+ cell count at Week 240 in the lamivudine group (P = 0.012); in the rilpivirine group we registered a significant increase in CD4/CD8 ratio (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Both analysed strategies are effective and safe as switch strategies in clinical practice, with a low incidence of VF and a favourable immunological recovery, even in the long term.

"Say Ninetynine": It's Never too Late to Recover from COVID-19

COVID-19, the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, showed higher severity and lethality in male older adults. There are currently no specific treatments. Studies are evaluating the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against interleukin-6 receptor. Here we present the case of a 98-years old man admitted to our COVID-Hospital with acute respiratory failure. Comprehensive geriatric assessment showed no signs of frailty. First-line therapy with hydroxychloroquine and anticoagulants was not effective. Patient was administered intravenous monoclonal antibodies, and he showed remarkable clinical improvement. This case suggests that age alone should not preclude access to new therapeutic approaches. Comprehensive, multisciplinary, multidomain approaches are needed to develop patient-tailored treatments against COVID-19.

Transmitted drug resistance to NRTIs and risk of virological failure in naïve patients treated with integrase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDRMs) could increase the risk of virological failure (VF) of first-line integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens.

METHODS

Patients starting two NRTIs (lamivudine/emtricitabine plus abacavir/tenofovir) plus raltegravir or dolutegravir were selected from the EuResist cohort. The role of NRTI genotypic susceptibility score and of specific TDRMs in VF (i.e. two consecutive viral loads > 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL or a single viral load ≥ 200 copies/mL after 3 months from antiretroviral therapy start) was evaluated in the overall population and according to the InSTI employed.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2017, 1095 patients were eligible for the analysis (55.5% men, median age 39 years). In all, 207 VFs occurred over 1023 patient-years of follow-up. The genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) had no effect on the risk of VF in the overall population. However, the presence of M184V/I independently predicted VF of raltegravir- but not dolutegravir-based therapy when compared with a fully-active backbone [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.09, P = 0.035], particularly when associated with other non-thymidine analogue mutations (aHR = 27.62, P = 0.004). Higher-zenith HIV-RNA and lower nadir CD4 counts independently predicted VF.

CONCLUSIONS

NRTI backbone TDRMs increased the risk of VF with raltegravir-based but not dolutegravir-based regimens.

Lamivudine-based maintenance antiretroviral therapies in patients living with HIV-1 with suppressed HIV RNA: derivation of a predictive score for virological failure

OBJECTIVES

Two-drug antiretroviral regimens based on lamivudine (3TC) plus either a protease inhibitor (PI) or dolutegravir (DTG) are becoming increasingly popular in switch strategies. Our goal was to derive a predictive score for virological failure (VF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data for a cohort of 587 virologically suppressed (HIV RNA < 37 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL), adult (≥ 18 years old) patients starting lamivudine plus either a boosted PI or dolutegravir. Predictors of VF (defined as a single HIV RNA measurement ≥ 1000 copies/mL or two consecutive HIV RNA measurements ≥ 50 copies/mL) were identified using a multivariate Cox regression model. A 'weighted' score was assigned to each variable associated with VF; the discriminative power of the score obtained was expressed as the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).

RESULTS

During a median 2 years of follow-up time, 35 VFs occurred; predictors of VF were baseline residual HIV RNA between 20 and 36 copies/mL, African ethnicity, ≥ 10 therapeutic lines, the presence of at least one resistance-associated mutation (RAM) for resistance to current drugs (excluding M184V), a non-B viral subtype and a baseline CD4 count < 200 cells/μL. A score of 2 was assigned to non-B viral subtype, 3 to residual viraemia ≥ 20 copies/mL, ≥ 10 previous therapeutic lines and African ethnicity, 4 to baseline CD4 count < 200 cells/μL, and 7 to the presence of at least one RAM (excluding M184V). The ROC-AUC was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of at least one RAM, higher residual viraemia and African ethnicity were among the major predictors of VF in our cohort. Studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to improve the predictive value of the derived score.

Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients in clinical practice: results from a multicentre, observational study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching antiretroviral therapy to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with those of switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in clinical practice.

METHODS

In a multicentre real-life observational study, we analysed data for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF (dolutegravir group) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF (elvitegravir group). Follow-up was censored at 48 weeks.

RESULTS

The 48-week estimated proportion maintaining virological efficacy was 96.1% with dolutegravir (n = 123) and 95.4% with elvitegravir (n = 186; P = 0.941). Patients in the dolutegravir group showed more treatment discontinuations, but these were mainly as a result of simplification. The elvitegravir group showed more discontinuations because of renal adverse events (2.7% versus 0% with dolutegravir). Interestingly, no difference was observed between the two regimens in central nervous system toxicity-related discontinuations. Switching to dolutegravir was associated with a better blood lipid profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF was associated with similar efficacy and tolerability to switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed patients in clinical practice, although reasons for discontinuation showed differences between regimens. These results should be interpreted with caution, as this is a nonrandomized comparison.

Efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in a multicentre cohort of patients with suppressed HIV-1 replication

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine + dolutegravir in a cohort of HIV-1 infected, treatment-experienced patients with undetectable HIV-RNA.

METHODS

Time to treatment discontinuation (TD) and virological failure (VF) and their predictors were assessed in a multicenter cohort of HIV-1 infected patients, starting lamivudine + dolutegravir after reaching viral suppression. Secondary objective was the evaluation of changes in lipid profile, renal and immunological functions at week 48.

RESULTS

We enrolled 206 patients (72.8% male, with 51 years median age), who mainly switched their antiretroviral therapy for simplification (32.5%) or drug toxicity (54.5%). The estimated probability of maintaining virological suppression at 48 and 96 weeks was 98.2% and 95.1%, respectively. VF was independently predicted by cumulative time on antiretroviral therapy. The estimated probability of remaining on lamivudine plus dolutegravir was 86.7% and 80.5% at week 48 and 96, respectively. A significant improvement in immunological function (CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio) was evidenced at week 48, as well as a decrease in total cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine plus dolutegravir was effective in maintaining viral suppression in our cohort and led to an improvement in metabolic and immunologic functions.

An outbreak of acute hepatitis A among young adult men: clinical features and HIV coinfection rate from a large teaching hospital in Rome, Italy

OBJECTIVES

Italy is a low-incidence region for hepatitis A; however, during the last 2 years an increase in the incidence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection was reported in Europe. The aim of this study was to describe this recent outbreak.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all cases of acute hepatitis A diagnosed at our laboratory between January 2010 and June 2017. We evaluated the following variables at the time of diagnosis: sex, age, nationality, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT/AST), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT/ALT), bilirubin concentration, international normalized ratio (INR) and the presence or absence of anti-HIV-1/2 antibodies. Hospitalization was also considered. We analysed these parameters using the χ² test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

A total of 225 cases were analysed; 82.7% were in male patients, 94.2% were in Italians and the median age of the patients was 36.4 years. At diagnosis, the median GOT value was 306 U/L, the median GPT was 1389 U/L, and the median total bilirubin value was 5.88 mg/dL. Hospitalization was required for 142 patients, with a median duration of hospital stay of 8.5 days. In 2016-2017 we registered 141 cases, with a higher prevalence of male patients, higher GPT values and a higher prevalence of patients aged 20-39 years compared with older (2010-2015) cases. Homosexual intercourse was reported as the HAV risk factor in 70.2% of patients. HIV serology was available for 120 patients: 24 were HIV-positive, four of whom represented new diagnoses. HIV-positive patients showed lower bilirubin and GPT values and fewer hospitalizations than HIV-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2016-2017, we saw a rise in the number of hepatitis A cases, with a higher prevalence of adult male patients. No significant differences regarding the prevalence of HIV coinfection emerged.