51
|
McDevitt JL, Quadri RS, Sutphin PD, Zeikus E, Kwon JK, Browning T, Reddick M. Capacity Prioritization Initiative Reduced the Wait Time for Port Placement and Facilitated Increased Volume of Port Placements at a Large County Health System. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 50:288-292. [PMID: 33010973 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM Wait time from request to placement of ports in interventional radiology had increased from 14 to 27 days over a 4-month period. The goal of this project was to reduce the wait time by 15% within 4 months while accommodating additional volume. INSTITUIONAL APPROACH TO ADDRESS PROBLEM Capacity analysis revealed 2 bottlenecks: (1) inadequate provider capacity for preprocedural visits in interventional radiology clinic and (2) inadequate number of spots for port placement in the angiography schedule. The intervention consisted of: (1) 2 reserved slots in the attending physician's morning clinic schedule and (2) 3 daily guaranteed spots for port placement in the angiography suite. Both changes were integrated into the electronic medical record scheduling system. DESCRIPTION OF OUTCOMES After the intervention, per biweekly period, the number of port requests increased by 17% (Preintervention: 16.6 ± 3.1, Postintervention: 20.1 ± 4.1, P = 0.03), the number of completed clinic visits increased by 19% (Preintervention: 16.7 ± 5.1, Postintervention: 20.5 ± 3.6, P = 0.05), and the number of port placements increased by 19% (Preintervention: 16.9 ± 3.9, Postintervention: 21.0 ± 3.5, P = 0.02). The average wait time from request to placement decreased by 22% (Preintervention: 22.2 ± 4.4 days, Postintervention: 18.3 ± 3.4 days, P = 0.03), driven by a 49% decrease in wait time between request and clinic visit (Preintervention: 11.0 ± 2.3 days, Postintervention: 7.4 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Prioritization of clinic and angiography suite capacity, integrated into the electronic scheduling system, significantly reduced the wait time for port placement, even with significant increases in the volume of port requests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L McDevitt
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Rehan S Quadri
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Eric Zeikus
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jeannie K Kwon
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Travis Browning
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Mark Reddick
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, Laurent-Puig P, Quirke P, Yoshino T, Taieb J, Martinelli E, Arnold D. Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1291-1305. [PMID: 32702383 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 592] [Impact Index Per Article: 148.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Argilés
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVic-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Labianca
- Department Oncology, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - R Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Iveson
- University Hospital Southampton, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - P Laurent-Puig
- Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris University, Paris, France; INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T Yoshino
- National Cancer Centre Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - J Taieb
- Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris University, Paris, France; INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France; Department of Gastroenterology and GI Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - E Martinelli
- Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Department of Precision Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092679. [PMID: 32961795 PMCID: PMC7564362 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In patients with stage III colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine combined with oxaliplatin reduces the risk of recurrence and mortality, with a treatment duration that may be shortened from 6 to 3 months in certain situations allowing to limit toxicities, especially cumulative sensitive neuropathy. However, it is difficult to effectively predict the risk of recurrence individually for each patient. It is indeed necessary not to over-treat patients with potential toxicities of chemotherapy and, conversely, not to under-treat patients at high risk of recurrence, and also to find new treatment approaches for specific subgroups. Though no single biomarker have sufficient predictive value to adapt the therapeutic strategy, we have considerably improved our knowledge of these biomarkers predictive of recurrence in localized colon cancer and many trials testing their ability to guide treatment are ongoing. Abstract In patients with stage III colon cancer (CC), adjuvant chemotherapy with the combination of oxapliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is a standard of care. The duration of treatment can be reduced from 6 months to 3 months, depending on the regimen, for patients at low risk of recurrence, without loss of effectiveness and allowing a significant reduction in the risk of cumulative sensitive neuropathy. However, our capacity to identify patients that do really need this doublet adjuvant treatment remains limited. In fact, only 30% at the most will actually benefit from this adjuvant treatment, 50% of them being already cured by the surgery and 20% of them experiencing disease recurrence despite the adjuvant treatment. Thus, it is necessary to be able to better predict individually for each patient the risk of recurrence and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy together with the need of new treatment approaches for specific subgroups. Many biomarkers have been described with their own prognostic weight, without leading to any change in clinical practices for now. In this review, we will first discuss the recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy, and then the different biomarkers described and the future perspectives for the management of stage III CC.
Collapse
|
54
|
Nunoo-Mensah JW, Rizk M, Caushaj PF, Giordano P, Fortunato R, Dulskas A, Bugra D, da Costa Pereira JM, Escalante R, Koda K, Samalavicius NE, Maeda K, Chun HK. COVID-19 and the Global Impact on Colorectal Practice and Surgery. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19:178-190.e1. [PMID: 32653470 PMCID: PMC7276135 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus that emerged in December 2019 causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the sudden national reorganization of health care systems and changes in the delivery of health care globally. The purpose of our study was to use a survey to assess the global effects of COVID-19 on colorectal practice and surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A panel of International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 22 questions, which were included in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in the ISUCRS database and was advertised on social media sites. The questionnaire remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. RESULTS A total of 287 surgeons completed the survey. Of the 287 respondents, 90% were colorectal specialists or general surgeons with an interest in colorectal disease. COVID-19 had affected the practice of 96% of the surgeons, and 52% were now using telemedicine. Also, 66% reported that elective colorectal cancer surgery could proceed but with perioperative precautions. Of the 287 respondents, 19.5% reported that the use of personal protective equipment was the most important perioperative precaution. However, personal protective equipment was only provided by 9.1% of hospitals. In addition, 64% of surgeons were offering minimally invasive surgery. However, 44% reported that enough information was not available regarding the safety of the loss of intra-abdominal carbon dioxide gas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, 61% of the surgeons were prepared to defer elective colorectal cancer surgery, with 29% willing to defer for ≤ 8 weeks. CONCLUSION The results from our survey have demonstrated that, globally, COVID-19 has affected the ability of colorectal surgeons to offer care to their patients. We have also discussed suggestions for various practical adaptation strategies for use during the recovery period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph W Nunoo-Mensah
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Mariam Rizk
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pasquale Giordano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Fortunato
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Audrius Dulskas
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Dursun Bugra
- Department of Surgery, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - Keiji Koda
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Kotaro Maeda
- Department of Surgery, International Medical Center, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Ho-Kyung Chun
- Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | -
- ISUCRS, 109 Partin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Chakrabarti S, Peterson CY, Sriram D, Mahipal A. Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:808-832. [PMID: 32879661 PMCID: PMC7443846 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colon cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity throughout the world despite the availability of reliable screening tools and effective therapies. The majority of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed at an early stage (stages I to III), which provides an opportunity for cure. The current treatment paradigm of early stage colon cancer consists of surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a select group of patients, which is directed at the eradication of minimal residual disease to achieve a cure. Surgery alone is curative for the vast majority of colon cancer patients. Currently, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can achieve long term survival in about two-thirds of colon cancer patients with nodal involvement. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with stage III colon cancer, while the benefit in stage II patients is not unequivocally established despite several large clinical trials. Contemporary research in early stage colon cancer is focused on minimally invasive surgical techniques, strategies to limit treatment-related toxicities, precise patient selection for adjuvant therapy, utilization of molecular and clinicopathologic information to personalize therapy and exploration of new therapies exploiting the evolving knowledge of tumor biology. In this review, we will discuss the current standard treatment, evolving treatment paradigms, and the emerging biomarkers, that will likely help improve patient selection and personalization of therapy leading to superior outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakti Chakrabarti
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Carrie Y Peterson
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Deepika Sriram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R, Chadbunchachai W, Ungprasert P. Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1453-1461. [PMID: 32572602 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03652-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves outcomes after elective colorectal operations. Whether it is beneficial for emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence from all studies comparing ERAS versus conventional care in patients having emergency colectomy and/or proctectomy for obstructive colorectal cancer. METHODS EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED from 1981 to December 2019 were systematically searched. Any studies comparing our primary outcome of interest (length of hospitalization) among patients having emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer who received ERAS versus conventional care were selected. Primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal recovery, postoperative complication, 30-day readmission and mortality, and time to start adjuvant therapy. RESULTS Three cohort studies with 818 participants (418 received ERAS and 400 received conventional care) were included. Length of hospitalization (mean reduction 3.07 days; 95% CI, - 3.91 to - 2.23) and risk of overall complication (risk ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97) were significantly lower in ERAS than in conventional care. ERAS was also associated with quicker time to gastrointestinal recovery, a lower incidence of ileus, and a shorter interval between operation and commence of adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the rates of anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and mortality within 30 days after surgery between groups. CONCLUSIONS ERAS had advantages over conventional care in patients undergoing emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer-including a shorter length of hospitalization, a lower incidence of overall complication, and a quicker gastrointestinal recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varut Lohsiriwat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wang Lung Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
| | - Romyen Jitmungngan
- The Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
| | | | - Patompong Ungprasert
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Grunewald CM, Henn A, Galsky MD, Plimack ER, Harshman LC, Yu EY, Crabb SJ, Pal SK, Alva AS, Powles T, De Giorgi U, Agarwal N, Bamias A, Ladoire S, Necchi A, Vaishampayan UN, Sternberg CN, Bellmunt J, Baniel J, Niegisch G. Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on patient survival. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:934.e1-934.e9. [PMID: 32660788 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy generally require chemotherapy to start within 90 days postoperatively. However, it is unclear, whether the interval between surgery and start of adjuvant therapy (S-AC-interval) impacts the oncological outcome. METHODS Using the Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) data base, we identified patients who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate analysis of patient characteristics, surgical factors and tumor characteristics regarding their impact on S-AC-interval was performed using Kruskal-Wallis testing and Fisher's exact test. Analysis of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (follow-up time beginning with the start date of adjuvant chemotherapy) was analyzed in relation to S-AC-interval (continuous and dichotomous with a cut-off at 90 days) using Kaplan-Meier method and COX regression analysis. RESULTS We identified 238 eligible patients (83.5% male, mean age: 63.4 years, 76.1% T3/T4, 66.4% pN+, 14.7% R+, 70.6% urothelial carcinoma, 71% cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy). The majority of patients (n = 207, 87%) started chemotherapy within 90 days after surgery. Median S-AC-interval was 57 days (interquartile range 32.8). S-AC-interval did not have consistent association with any patient/tumor characteristics or surgery related factors (type of surgery, urinary diversion). Survival analysis using continuous S-AC-interval revealed a trend toward an impact of S-AC-interval on OS (hazard ratio 1.004, 95% confidence ratio 0.9997-1.0084, P = 0.071). With regards to PFS, that impact was shown to be statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.004, 95% confidence ratio 1.0003-1.0075, P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, however, S-AC-interval was negated by tumor and patient related factors (pathological T-stage, N-stage, ECOG performance status). Accounting for eligibility criteria defined in some clinical trials, we extended our analysis dividing S-AC-interval in ≤90 and >90 days. Although we could confirm the trend toward better outcome in patients with a shorter S-AC interval in dichotomous analysis, neither differences in OS nor in PFS reached statistical significance (P = 0.438 and P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS In a large multi-institutional experience, 87% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy received it within the guideline recommended window of 90 days. While it was not possible to determine whether this is the optimal cut-off, early start of adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be reasonable. Regarding prognosis, tumor-related pathological factors abrogated the importance of the S-AC-interval in our analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla M Grunewald
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | | | - Matthew D Galsky
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY
| | | | - Lauren C Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Simon J Crabb
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Haematology-Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute of Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Lee JJ, Chu E. The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Approach to the Management of Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19:146-148. [PMID: 32811719 PMCID: PMC7347322 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James J Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cancer Therapeutics Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Edward Chu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cancer Therapeutics Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Willett CG. Trimodal Therapy Approaches for Localized Rectal Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.5015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Excellent long-term outcomes and manageable toxicity are being achieved with contemporary treatment strategies for rectal cancer. Short-course radiotherapy is now an acceptable standard. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which incorporates induction or consolidation chemotherapy, has improved the delivery of treatment regiments. TNT is now a standard of care, although the sequencing of radiation and chemotherapy in TNT, appropriate amount of chemotherapy in TNT, and addition of irinotecan to the regimen are still being debated. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer appears to be a safe option for select patients, but it is not yet an NCCN recommendation. In addition, the omission of radiation is being evaluated as a treatment option in some cases.
Collapse
|
60
|
Sun L, Xu Y, Zhang T, Yang Y. Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or III colon cancer: experiences from a multicentre clinical trial in China. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 27:159-162. [PMID: 32669926 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Since January 2020, the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease designated covid-19 by the World Health Organization, a human-to-human contagious viral pneumonia that began in 2019, has been extensively influencing daily life in China[...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sun
- Oncology Department, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R.C
| | - Y Xu
- Oncology Department, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R.C
| | - T Zhang
- Oncology Department, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R.C
| | - Y Yang
- Oncology Department, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R.C
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Is Early Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Beneficial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Radical Surgery? World J Surg 2020; 44:3149-3157. [PMID: 32415467 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to evaluate whether earlier initiation (< 4 weeks) of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) confer any oncological benefits for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and radical surgery. METHOD Clinicopathological and survival outcomes were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for differences between groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of earlier ACT initiation on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Totally, 443 eligible patients were included. More laparoscopic surgeries, less postoperative complications, and more ACT completion were observed in patients whose ACT was initiated within 4 weeks after surgery (all P < 0.001). With a mean follow-up of 59 months, the 5-year OS and DFS rate was 89.8% and 82.0% in the early group, significantly higher than 81.6% and 73.1% in the late group (P = 0.007, and P = 0.022, respectively). After PSM, the 5-year OS and DFS rate was 90.9% and 84.4% in the early group, significantly higher than 83.4% and 68.8% in the late group (P = 0.047, and P = 0.017, respectively). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that time to ACT initiation (early vs. late, HR = 0.486, P = 0.008) was independently associated with OS. CONCLUSION Early initiation of ACT (<4 weeks) confers a survival benefit, and is an independent prognostic factor of OS in LARC patients following nCRT. Further investigations are needed to define the role of earlier initiation of ACT in patients with LARC after nCRT.
Collapse
|
62
|
Banerjee A, Pathak S, Jothimani G, Roy S. Antiproliferative effects of combinational therapy of Lycopodium clavatum and quercetin in colon cancer cells. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2020; 31:/j/jbcpp.ahead-of-print/jbcpp-2019-0193/jbcpp-2019-0193.xml. [PMID: 32396140 DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent form of cancer and fourth leading cause of morbidity worldwide. Surgical resection remains the only curative approach for CRC, but recurrence following surgery is the main problem and ultimate cause of death. Lycopodium clavatum and quercetin have been found to exert its anticancer properties. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether quercetin or L. clavatum extract and combination of both have any profound role in reducing major inflammatory cytokines in Colo-320 cells. Methods L. clavatum and Quercetin alone or in combination was administered to colon cancer cells and various toxicity markers, gene expression analyses of apototic genes and gelatin zymmography were performed. Results Quercetin (50 μm) in combination with L. clavatum extract (10 μL) distinctly reduced cell growth and highlighted their potential effects in extirpation of colon cancer cells. Treatment with increased dose of L. clavatum extract in combination with quercetin reduced the colony size and proliferation potential when compared to the sole treatment of plant extracts. In the antimicrobial assays, it was observed that Lycopodium alone exhibited antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Characterization of L. clavatum extract and quercetin was performed and confirmed the presence of flavonoids and alkaloids. Treatment with Lycopodium and quercetin combination induced significant down-regulation in activities of MMP2 and MMP9 tested by gelatin zymography. The combined treatment greatly affected the mRNA expression of p53, Bcl2, Bax, Caspase 3, Wnt 1, Cyclin D1, and Catalase genes in colon cancer cells. Conclusion The synergistic effect between Lycopodium and quercetin might bring forward the enhanced antitumorigenic properties of combinational therapy with natural products to successfully combat the cancer progression with minimal side effects and resistance to drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antara Banerjee
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE) and Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Kelambakkam 603 103, India, Phone: +919566072596, +917401790276, +91-44-47429050
| | - Surajit Pathak
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| | - Ganesan Jothimani
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| | - Susmita Roy
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Minicozzi P, Vicentini M, Innos K, Castro C, Guevara M, Stracci F, Carmona-Garcia M, Rodriguez-Barranco M, Vanschoenbeek K, Rapiti E, Katalinic A, Marcos-Gragera R, Van Eycken L, Sánchez MJ, Bielska-Lasota M, Rossi PG, Sant M. Comorbidities, timing of treatments, and chemotherapy use influence outcomes in stage III colon cancer: A population-based European study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1151-1159. [PMID: 32147427 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For stage III colon cancer (CC), surgery followed by chemotherapy is the main curative approach, although optimum times between diagnosis and surgery, and surgery and chemotherapy, have not been established. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed a population-based sample of 1912 stage III CC cases diagnosed in eight European countries in 2009-2013 aiming to estimate: (i) odds of receiving postoperative chemotherapy, overall and within eight weeks of surgery; (ii) risks of death/relapse, according to treatment, Charlson Comorbidity Index, time from diagnosis to surgery for emergency and elective cases, and time from surgery to chemotherapy; and (iii) time-trends in chemotherapy use. RESULTS Overall, 97% of cases received surgery and 65% postoperative chemotherapy, with 71% of these receiving chemotherapy within eight weeks of surgery. Risks of death and relapse were higher for cases starting chemotherapy with delay, but better than for cases not given chemotherapy. Fewer patients with high comorbidities received chemotherapy than those with low (P < 0.001). Chemotherapy timing did not vary (P = 0.250) between high and low comorbidity cases. Electively-operated cases with low comorbidities received surgery more promptly than high comorbidity cases. Risks of death and relapse were lower for elective cases given surgery after four weeks than cases given surgery within a week. High comorbidities were always independently associated with poorer outcomes. Chemotherapy use increased over time. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that promptly-administered postoperative chemotherapy maximizes its benefit, and that careful assessment of comorbidities is important before treatment. The survival benefit associated with slightly delayed elective surgery deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Minicozzi
- Analytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Research Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Massimo Vicentini
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Kaire Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Clara Castro
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; EpiUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marcela Guevara
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain; IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabrizio Stracci
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Public Health, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; Umbria Cancer Registry, Perugia, Italy
| | - MaCarmen Carmona-Garcia
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Universitary Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain; Descriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
| | | | - Elisabetta Rapiti
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Rafael Marcos-Gragera
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Descriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; School of Medicine, University of Girona (UdG), Girona, Spain; Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health Government of Catalonia, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Maria José Sánchez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain; Universidad de Granada (UGR), Granada, Spain
| | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Milena Sant
- Analytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Research Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Ma SJ, Oladeru OT, Miccio JA, Iovoli AJ, Hermann GM, Singh AK. Association of Timing of Adjuvant Therapy With Survival in Patients With Resected Stage I to II Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e199126. [PMID: 31411712 PMCID: PMC6694394 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is widely used to treat resectable pancreatic cancer. Although studies suggest initiation of adjuvant therapy within 12 weeks of surgery, there is no clear time interval associated with better survival. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ideal timing of adjuvant therapy for patients with stage I to II resected pancreatic cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included 7548 patients with stage I to II resected pancreatic cancer (5453 with adjuvant therapy; 2095 without adjuvant therapy) from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. Data were collected from January 2014 to December 2015 and analyzed from December 2018 to May 2019. EXPOSURES Adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation at various time intervals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 7548 patients (3770 male [49.9%]; median [interquartile range] age, 67 [59-74] years) were identified from the National Cancer Database. Among 5453 patients with adjuvant therapy, a Cox model with restricted cubic splines identified the lowest mortality risk when adjuvant therapy was started 28 to 59 days after surgery. Patients were divided into early (n = 269, adjuvant therapy initiated within <28 days), reference (n = 3048, adjuvant therapy initiated within 28-59 days), and late (n = 2136, adjuvant therapy initiated after >59 days) interval cohorts. Median (interquartile range) overall follow-up was 38.6 (24.6-62.0) months. Compared with the reference interval cohort on multivariable analysis, both the early cohort (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.35; P = .03) and the late cohort (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = .008) were associated with worse mortality. Similarly, the reference interval cohort had improved OS compared with the early cohort in 268 propensity-matched pairs (2-year OS, 52.5% [95% CI, 46.7%-59.0%] vs 45.1% [95% CI, 39.5%-51.6%]; P = .02) and compared with the late cohort in 2042 propensity-matched pairs (2-year OS, 51.3% [95% CI, 49.1%-53.6%] vs 45.4% [95% CI, 43.3%-47.7%]; P = .01). Patients who received adjuvant therapy more than 12 weeks after surgery (n = 683) had improved OS compared with surgery alone in both multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85; P < .001) and 655 propensity-matched pairs (2-year OS, 47.2% [95% CI, 43.5%-51.3%] vs 38.0% [95% CI, 34.4%-42.0%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients with stage I to II pancreatic cancer who commenced adjuvant therapy within 28 to 59 days after primary surgical resection had improved survival outcomes compared with those with adjuvant therapy before 28 days or after 59 days. Patients who recovered slowly from surgery still benefited from delayed adjuvant therapy initiated more than 12 weeks after surgery compared with patients who underwent surgery only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Joseph A. Miccio
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Austin J. Iovoli
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo-State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo
| | - Gregory M. Hermann
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Taieb J, André T, Auclin E. Refining adjuvant therapy for non-metastatic colon cancer, new standards and perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 75:1-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
66
|
Petrelli F, Zaniboni A, Ghidini A, Ghidini M, Turati L, Pizzo C, Ratti M, Libertini M, Tomasello G. Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Colorectal, Gastric, and Pancreatic Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040550. [PMID: 30999653 PMCID: PMC6520704 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in gastrointestinal malignancies is still a matter of debate. For colorectal cancer, it is recommended to start post-operative treatment within eight weeks. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical effects of starting adjuvant CT within or after 6–8 weeks post-surgery in colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. (2) Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched in December 2018. Publications comparing the outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant CT administered before (early) or after (delayed) 6–8 weeks post-surgery for colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). (3) Results: Out of 8752 publications identified, 34 comparative studies assessing a total of 141,853 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant increased risk of death with delayed CT (>6–8 weeks post-surgery) in colorectal cancer (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–1.33; p <0.001). Similarly, for gastric cancer, delaying adjuvant CT was associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.04–1.38; p = 0.01). Conversely, the benefit of earlier CT was not evident in pancreatic cancer (HR = 1, 95% CI 1–1.01; p = 0.37). Conclusions: Starting adjuvant CT within 6–8 weeks post-surgery is associated with a significant survival benefit for colorectal and gastric cancer, but not for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Luca Turati
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST of Bergamo, 24100 Bergamo Ovest, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
67
|
Scheede-Bergdahl C, Minnella EM, Carli F. Multi-modal prehabilitation: addressing the why, when, what, how, who and where next? Anaesthesia 2019; 74 Suppl 1:20-26. [PMID: 30604416 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Just as there is growing interest in enhancing recovery after surgery, prehabilitation is becoming a recognised means of preparing the patient physically for their operation and/or subsequent treatment. Exercise training is an important stimulus for improving low cardiovascular fitness and preserving lean muscle mass, which are critical factors in how well the patient recovers from surgery. Despite the usual focus on exercise, it is important to recognise the contribution of nutritional optimisation and psychological wellbeing for both the adherence and the response to the physical training stimulus. This article reviews the importance of a multi-modal approach to prehabilitation in order to maximise its impact in the pre-surgical period, as well as critical future steps in its development and integration in the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Scheede-Bergdahl
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill Research Centre for Physical Activity and Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,McGill Research Centre for Physical Activity and Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - E M Minnella
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - F Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Yang H, Li X, Shi J, Fu H, Yang H, Liang Z, Xiong H, Wang H. A nomogram to predict prognosis in patients undergoing sublobar resection for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:6611-6626. [PMID: 30584357 PMCID: PMC6284539 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s182458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to develop a practical nomogram to predict prognosis in patients who are undergoing sublobar resection for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases were used to construct the nomogram. Methods Data from patients undergoing sublobar resection for stage IA NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were extracted from the SEER database. Factors that may predict the outcome were identified using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional-hazards model. A nomogram was constructed to predict the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) rates of these patients. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was measured using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Results A total of 4,866 patients were selected for this study. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, eight independent prognostic factors associated with OS were identified, including sex (P<0.001), age (P<0.001), race (P=0.043), marital status (P=0.009), pathology (P=0.004), differentiation (P<0.001), tumor size (P<0.001), and surgery (P=0.001), and five independent prognostic factors associated with LCSS were also identified, including sex (P<0.001), age (P<0.001), differentiation (P<0.001), tumor size (P<0.001), and surgery (P=0.011). A nomogram was established based on these results and validated using the internal bootstrap resampling method. The C-index of the established nomogram for OS and LCSS was 0.649 (95% CI: 0.635–0.663) and 0.640 (95% CI: 0.622–0.658), respectively. The calibration curves for probability of 3-, and 5-year OS and LCSS rates demonstrated good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observation. Conclusion This innovative nomogram delivered a relatively accurate individual prognostic prediction for patients undergoing sublobar resection for stage IA NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heli Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Jialun Shi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Liang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongchao Xiong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|