Heparin monitoring during cardiac surgery. Part 1: validation of whole-blood heparin concentration and activated clotting time

Anticoagulation monitoring during extracorporeal circulation with the Hepcon/HMS device

Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the standard protocol of anticoagulation to the Hepcon/HMS.

Method: This study included forty-four patients who underwent coronary bypass grafting surgery (CABG), or biological aortic valve replacement (AVR). Unfractionated heparin (UH) was used for patients who underwent operations in the control group (n = 22) (300U/Kg of UH with a goal of an ACT of 400s). The heparin was antagonized dose/dose by protamine. For the patients who underwent operations in the HMS group (n = 22), the heparin and protamine doses were assessed by the Hepcon/HMS device.

Results: The sex ratio amounted to 1.93 (29 men and 15 women) and the mean age was 70 ± 11 years. The patients in the HMS group had a chest closure time that was significantly shorter than patients in the control group. The times were, respectively, 42 ± 15 minutes and 68 ± 27 minutes (p = 0.001). The protamine/heparin ratio was significantly lower in the HMS group (0.62 ± 0.13 vs. 1 ± 0.11) (p = 0.0001). The postoperative bleeding amounted to 804 ± 729 ml in the HMS group versus 1416 ± 1103 in the control group (p = 0.016). In multivariate linear regression analysis, only two independent factors were significantly associated with bleeding: the Hepcon/HMS (OR = 0.1-p = 0.03) and the preoperative hemoglobin rate (OR = 1.4 - p = 0.05). Postoperatively, within 72 hours, the red blood cell transfusion was 1.04 ± 1.5 units for the HMS group and 2.1 ± 1.87 units for the control group (p = 0.05).

Conclusion: During cardiac surgery under CPB, heparin and protamine titration with the Hepcon/HMS device could predict a lower protamine dose and lower postoperative bleeding without higher thromboembolic events, and lower perioperative red blood cell transfusion with a shorter chest closure time.

Comparison of two infusion rates of antithrombin concentrate in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

Background: Antithrombin concentrate (AT) is used to treat heparin resistance (HR) in cardiac surgery. It is usually given slowly due to the fear of anaphylaxis. This may delay cardiac catheterisation and the start of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). HR is often defined as the failure to reach or maintain a target activated clotting time (ACT) despite a standard dose of heparin. It is not generally possible to predict which patients will display HR, although there are known risk factors. Routine early administration of AT before heparinisation is probably not cost-effective. Infusing AT relatively quickly after demonstrating HR may be more cost-effective, while not delaying surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and side effects of a faster infusion of AT.

Methods: Forty patients undergoing elective heart surgery were included and randomised to two groups in a double-blind fashion. Each group received 1000 IU of AT intravenously (IV). One group received a slow infusion (100 IU/min) before full-dose heparinisation. The other group received a fast infusion (250 IU/min). Haemodynamic and respiratory data were recorded. Any adverse effects were noted. Thrombin-antithrombin, anti-Xa and antithrombin levels in plasma were measured.

Results: No anaphylaxis occurred in either group. No differences were found regarding haemodynamics, respiration or laboratory results. Two patients experienced major haemorrhage and recovered; there were two deaths, thought to be unrelated to the study drugs.

Conclusion: AT can be infused at a rate of 250 IU/min. This is faster than the current recommendation of 100 IU/min. This rate of infusion allows restricting AT infusion to those patients who display HR, without delaying surgery. Optimal anticoagulant therapy for CPB probably includes point-of-care measurement of ACT and plasma AT and small, but rapid, infusions of AT in heparin-resistant patients.

Lupus Anticoagulant, Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Cardiac Surgery

The presence of lupus anticoagulant and the related condition antiphospholipid syndrome present a challenge in cardiac surgery where measured anticoagulation may not reflect the in vivo patient status of hypercoagulation. We report the successful management of a patient with lupus anticoagulant presenting for aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularisation. We used heparin for anticoagulation, specialised additional tests of anticoagulation and a reduced protamine dose. We also used tranexamic acid. The clinical problems with anticoagulation in patients with lupus anticoagulant include anticoagulant choice, measurement of adequate anticoagulation, antifibrinolytic usage, protamine dosing and blood product transfusion.

Heparin concentration-based anticoagulation for cardiac surgery fails to reliably predict heparin bolus dose requirements

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis management has evolved to include sophisticated point-of-care systems that provide individualized dosing through heparin concentration-based anticoagulation. The Hepcon HMS Plus system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) estimates heparin dose, activated clotting time (ACT), and heparin dose response (HDR). However, the accuracy of this test has not been systematically evaluated in large cohorts.

METHODS

We examined institutional databases for all patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at our institution from February 2005 to July 2008. During this period, the Hepcon HMS Plus was used exclusively for assessment of heparin dosing and coagulation monitoring. Detailed demographic, surgical, laboratory, and heparin dosing data were recorded. ACT, calculated and measured HDR, and heparin concentrations were recorded. Performance of the Hepcon HMS Plus was assessed by comparison of actual and target ACT values and calculated and measured HDR.

RESULTS

In 3880 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, heparin bolus dosing to a target ACT resulted in wide variation in the postheparin ACT (r(2) = 0.03). The postheparin ACT did not reach the target ACT threshold in 7.4%(i.e., when target ACT was 300 s) and 16.9% (i.e., when target ACT was 350 s) of patients. Similarly, the target heparin level calculated from the HDR did not correlate with the postbolus heparin level, with 18.5% of samples differing by more than 2 levels of the assay. Calculated and measured HDR were not linearly related at any heparin level.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hepcon HMS Plus system poorly estimates heparin bolus requirements in the pre-CPB period. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate what constitutes adequate anticoagulation for CPB and how clinicians can reliably and practically assess anticoagulation in the operating room.

The surgical application of point-of-care haemostasis and platelet function testing

Background

Disordered coagulation complicates many diseases and their treatments, often predisposing to haemorrhage. Conversely, patients with cardiovascular disease who demonstrate antiplatelet resistance may be at increased thromboembolic risk. Prompt identification of these patients facilitates optimization of haemostatic dysfunction. Point-of-care (POC) tests are performed ‘near patient’ to provide a rapid assessment of haemostasis and platelet function.

Methods

This article reviews situations in which POC tests may guide surgical practice. Their limitations and potential developments are discussed. The paper is based on a Medline and PubMed search for English language articles on POC haemostasis and platelet function testing in surgical practice.

Results

POC tests identifying perioperative bleeding tendency are already widely used in cardiovascular and hepatic surgery. They are associated with reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements. POC tests to identify thrombotic predisposition are able to determine antiplatelet resistance, predicting thromboembolic risk. So far, however, these tests remain research tools.

Conclusion

POC haemostasis testing is a growing field in surgical practice. Such testing can be correlated with improved clinical outcome.

Guideline on antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery

This document presents a professional view of evidence-based recommendations around the issues of antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery. It was prepared by the Audit and Guidelines Committee of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). We review the following topics: evidence for aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin cessation prior to cardiac surgery; perioperative interventions to reduce bleeding including the use of aprotinin and tranexamic acid; the use of thromboelastography to guide blood product usage; protamine reversal of heparin; the use of factor VIIa to control severe bleeding; anticoagulation after mechanical, tissue valve replacement and mitral valve repair; the use of antiplatelets and clopidogrel after cardiac surgery to improve graft patency and reduce thromboembolic complications and thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period. This guideline is subject to continuous informal review, and when new evidence becomes available. The formal review date will be at 5 years from publication (September 2013).

Determination of Intact Heparin by Capillary Electrophoresis with Contactless Conductivity Detection in Background Electrolytes Containing Hydrophilic Polymers

Intact heparin was characterized and determined in model samples, in infusion solutions and in blood plasma by capillary electrophoresis (CE) with contactless conductivity detection. The CE separation of polydisperse heparin took place in open silica capillaries, in electrolytes containing a polymer (hydroxyethyl)cellulose, poly(ethylene glycol) or dextran. The best separation of heparin from excess inorganic ions present in real samples was attained in a background electrolyte consisting of 0.8 M acetic acid and 1% (w/v) dextran (100 kDa). The limit of detection (LOD) was 1.3 μmol l-1. This electrolyte was used in determination of heparin in blood plasma and in infusion solutions.

Monitoring of heparin and its low-molecular-weight analogs by silicon field effect

Heparin is a highly sulfated glycosaminoglycan that is used as an important clinical anticoagulant. Monitoring and control of the heparin level in a patient's blood during and after surgery is essential, but current clinical methods are limited to indirect and off-line assays. We have developed a silicon field-effect sensor for direct detection of heparin by its intrinsic negative charge. The sensor consists of a simple microfabricated electrolyte-insulator-silicon structure encapsulated within microfluidic channels. As heparin-specific surface probes the clinical heparin antagonist protamine or the physiological partner antithrombin III were used. The dose-response curves in 10% PBS revealed a detection limit of 0.001 units/ml, which is orders of magnitude lower than clinically relevant concentrations. We also detected heparin-based drugs such as the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin (Lovenox) and the synthetic pentasaccharide heparin analog fondaparinux (Arixtra), which cannot be monitored by the existing near-patient clinical methods. We demonstrated the specificity of the antithrombin III functionalized sensor for the physiologically active pentasaccharide sequence. As a validation, we showed correlation of our measurements to those from a colorimetric assay for heparin-mediated anti-Xa activity. These results demonstrate that silicon field-effect sensors could be used in the clinic for routine monitoring and maintenance of therapeutic levels of heparin and heparin-based drugs and in the laboratory for quantitation of total amount and specific epitopes of heparin and other glycosaminoglycans.