Cancer mortality in patients with schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of chronic physical illness on treatment outcomes among patients with schizophrenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Previous research has demonstrated the high prevalence of medical comorbidity and multimorbidity among patients with schizophrenia. However, little is known regarding the potential effects of chronic physical illness (CPI) on schizophrenia treatment outcomes. In the present report, we aim to provide an updated review of the relevant literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

We searched MEDLINE for studies published between 2017 and 2018. After screening 683 articles, we included six studies of adequate quality. Five of these studies reported significant associations between several CPIs and different schizophrenia treatment outcomes, whereas the remaining study did not. Significant effects were low to moderate in size. CPIs with significant effects on treatment outcomes included metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and asthma. No significant effects were observed for diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatitis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or lung conditions. One study reported a significant association between the total number of CPIs and the overall number of psychiatric rehospitalizations.

SUMMARY

In addition to increasing the risk of premature mortality, accumulating evidence indicates that various CPIs affect schizophrenia treatment outcomes. Thus, researchers and healthcare practitioners should increase efforts to raise awareness regarding the importance of physical health among patients with schizophrenia. Further high-quality studies are required, particularly those targeting the potential effects of individual CPIs.

Delay in the Diagnosis of Breast and Colorectal Cancer in People With Severe Mental Disorders

BACKGROUND

People with severe mental disorders have a worse cancer prognosis, with higher mortality rates than the general population, and this could be partially attributed to a later detection. Breast cancer and colorectal cancer have mass population screenings in Spain, but the influence in early diagnosis is unknown in persons with severe mental disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the severity of breast and colorectal cancers at diagnosis in people with and without mental disorders.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective, case-control study with 1:2 matching performed in Eastern Spain. Data were retrieved for analysis from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The study included 111 oncology patients (75 with breast cancer and 36 with colorectal cancer). Individuals with mental disorders had a significantly higher (P = .002) relative risk (odds ratio [OR], 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-9.65) to be diagnosed with an advanced tumor stage (clinical stages IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV), for both breast and colorectal cancers when analyzed separately. The variables associated with advanced cancer at the time of diagnosis were the presence of a previous mental disorder (OR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.73-12.61) and older age (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with severe mental disorders showed a higher risk of being diagnosed with breast and colorectal cancers at advanced stages.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Cancer screening for earlier detection and intervention in people with severe mental disorders needs improvement. Mental health nurses, screening nurses, and oncology nurses could serve an essential role in increasing the screening adherence of this group of individuals.

Excess medical comorbidity and mortality across the lifespan in schizophrenia.: A nationwide Danish register study

INTRODUCTION

People with severe mental illness have greater risk of un-detected and inadequately treated medical disorders, adding up to the risk of premature death. This study investigated how chronic medical comorbidity evolved across the lifespan in schizophrenia and the associated impact on mortality.

METHOD

A register-based retrospective nested case-control study was conducted, identifying incident cases of cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer and diabetes, as well as mortality due to these diseases, across the lifespan in schizophrenia.

SAMPLE

A schizophrenia cohort consisting of 4924 individuals aged 18-40 years registered with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-8: 295.0-3 + 295.9) during admission to a psychiatric hospital unit in 1970-79. Schizophrenia cases were age and gender matched with 22,597 controls in the general population.

RESULTS

Rate ratio (RR) of CVD and cancer were similar to controls. The RR of COPD and diabetes were increased across the lifespan. The probability of having been diagnosed prior to dying from CVD, cancer, pulmonary diseases or diabetes was markedly reduced in schizophrenia cases compared to controls. The RR of all-cause mortality and mortality from CVD, COPD and diabetes remained elevated in all age groups in schizophrenia. Registration of medical comorbidity was associated with increased survival.

CONCLUSION

Excess medical comorbidity persists across the lifespan and into older age. No age-related decrease in incidence of major chronic medical comorbidities in schizophrenia was found except for diabetes.

The impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve physical health outcomes in people with schizophrenia: a meta-review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

We summarized and compared meta-analyses of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions targeting physical health outcomes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Major databases were searched until June 1, 2018. Of 3,709 search engine hits, 27 meta-analyses were included, representing 128 meta-analyzed trials and 47,231 study participants. While meta-analyses were generally of adequate or high quality, meta-analyzed studies were less so. The most effective weight reduction interventions were individual lifestyle counseling (standardized mean difference, SMD=-0.98) and exercise interventions (SMD=-0.96), followed by psychoeducation (SMD=-0.77), aripiprazole augmentation (SMD=-0.73), topiramate (SMD=-0.72), d-fenfluramine (SMD=-0.54) and metformin (SMD=-0.53). Regarding waist circumference reduction, aripiprazole augmentation (SMD=-1.10) and topiramate (SMD=-0.69) demonstrated the best evidence, followed by dietary interventions (SMD=-0.39). Dietary interventions were the only to significantly improve (diastolic) blood pressure (SMD=-0.39). Switching from olanzapine to quetiapine or aripiprazole (SMD=-0.71) and metformin (SMD=-0.65) demonstrated best efficacy for reducing glucose levels, followed by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (SMD=-0.39), dietary interventions (SMD=-0.37) and aripiprazole augmentation (SMD=-0.34), whereas insulin resistance improved the most with metformin (SMD=-0.75) and rosiglitazone (SMD=-0.44). Topiramate had the greatest efficacy for triglycerides (SMD=-0.68) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (SMD=-0.80), whereas metformin had the greatest beneficial effects on total cholesterol (SMD=-0.51) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (SMD=0.45). Lifestyle interventions yielded small effects for triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol (SMD=-0.35 to -0.37). Only exercise interventions increased exercise capacity (SMD=1.81). Despite frequent physical comorbidities and premature mortality mainly due to these increased physical health risks, the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in people with schizophrenia to prevent and treat these conditions is still limited and more larger trials are urgently needed.

Screening for emotional disorders in patients with cancer using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the BSI-18 versus a standardized psychiatric interview (the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview)

BACKGROUND

Given the adverse consequences of psychiatric and psychosocial morbidity on the quality of life for patients with cancer, prompt detection of psychological symptoms is mandatory. The authors examined the properties and accuracy of the Brief Symptom Inventory (the 53-item version [BSI] and the 18-item version [BSI-18]) for the detection of psychiatric morbidity compared with the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision psychiatric diagnoses.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 498 patients with newly diagnosed cancer who were recruited in cancer outpatient services participated in the CIDI interview and in BSI and BSI-18 assessments.

RESULTS

The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity was 39.75%. When participants were classified as cases using the BSI standard case rule, agreement with the CIDI was potentially acceptable (sensitivity, 72.7%; specificity, 88.7%). In contrast, the accuracy of the BSI-18 in identifying cases was poor according to the standard case rule, with very low sensitivity (29.3%) (misclassification rate, 28.7%). By using a first alternative case-rule system (a BSI-18 global severity index [GSI] T-score ≥57), sensitivity marginally improved (45%), whereas a second alternative case-rule system (a GSI T-score ≥50) significantly increased sensitivity (77.3%). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a further cutoff GSI T-score ≥48 exhibited good discrimination levels (sensitivity, 82.3%; specificity, 72.4%). There were some differences in GSI cutoff T-scores according to the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision diagnosis and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

The BSI appeared to have acceptable diagnostic accuracy compared with a standardized psychiatric interview. For the BSI-18, it is mandatory to use alternative case-rule systems, to identify patients with psychiatric morbidity. Cancer 2018;124:2415-26. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Association of Schizophrenia With the Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence: A Meta-analysis

Importance

Patients with schizophrenia are considered to have many risk factors for the development of cancer. However, the incidence of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population remains uncertain.

Objective

To perform an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the association between schizophrenia and the risk of breast cancer.

Data Sources

A systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted using the search terms schizophrenia, schizophrenic, psychosis, combined with breast and cancer, tumor, neoplasm, or carcinoma. The final literature search was performed on August 15, 2017.

Study Selection

Cohort studies reporting the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for the risk of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The meta-analysis adhered to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data extraction was performed independently. A random-effects model was used to pool the results, and a recently proposed prediction interval was calculated to describe the heterogeneity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The SIR for the risk of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population or those without schizophrenia.

Results

Twelve cohorts including 125 760 women were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that schizophrenia was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer incidence in women (SIR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.50; P < .001), with significant heterogeneity (P < .001; I2 = 89%). Substantial between-study variance was also suggested by the wide prediction interval (0.81-2.10), which indicated that it is possible that a future study will show a decreased breast cancer risk in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population. The subgroup analysis results showed that the association was not significantly affected by whether breast cancer cases were excluded at baseline or the sample size of the included studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

The incidence of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia is higher than that of the general female population. However, significant heterogeneity exists among the included studies. Women with schizophrenia deserve intensive prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

Lower risk of liver cancer in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Previous studies regarding the association between schizophrenia and the subsequent risk of liver cancer have shown inconsistent results. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between schizophrenia and liver cancer incidence. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase electronic databases for cohort studies reporting the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for the risk of liver cancer in patents with schizophrenia as compared with the general population. A random-effects model was used to analyze the data. Stratified analyses were performed according to the gender of the patients. Seven studies comprising 312,834 patients with schizophrenia were included. During follow-up, 581 liver cancer cases were confirmed. The meta-analysis results showed that schizophrenia was associated with a trend of a lower liver cancer incidence (SIR: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–1.04, p = 0.10) with significant heterogeneity (I² = 81%). Sensitivity analysis of five cohorts of patients with cancer events before the diagnosis of schizophrenia indicated that schizophrenia was associated with a significantly lower incidence of liver cancer (SIR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61–0.96, p = 0.02; I² = 84%). The reduction of a subsequent incidence of liver cancer was significant in male patients with schizophrenia (SIR: 0.71, p = 0.005), and a trend of a reduced risk of liver cancer was also detected in female patients (SIR: 0.83, p = 0.12). Significant publication bias was detected. However, “trim and fill” analyses by including the imputed unpublished studies showed similar results. In summary, schizophrenia may be protective against the incidence of liver cancer.