Clinical impact of chemotherapy dose escalation in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors

Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14-treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.94). A slightly non-statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.16).

CONCLUSION

In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

Are medical oncologists biased in their treatment of the large woman with breast cancer?

PURPOSE

Obesity and breast cancer are common conditions that often coexist. Concerns of relative overdosing of chemotherapy in the large cancer patient have led clinicians to apply empiric dose reductions, 'cap' the body surface area (BSA) at 2 m2, or use ideal rather than actual body weight to calculate BSA. There are no data supporting or refuting these practices and their prevalence is unknown. We sought to determine the distribution of body size and prevalence of obesity in the breast cancer population of our cancer centre, and to determine clinician chemotherapy dosing practices in the era of modern adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with invasive breast cancer receiving systemic therapy at our institution between 1980 and 1998 were identified and their recorded height and weight were used to calculate BSA and body mass index (BMI). We reviewed the first cycle adjuvant chemotherapy dosing practices from 1990-1998. The ideal dose of chemotherapy was calculated based on calculated BSA, and then contrasted with the actual dose received at cycle one. Discrepancies were recorded and categorized, using the largest single drug reduction if more than one drug was reduced.

RESULTS

Mean BMI in the systemic therapy population was 26.4 +/- 5.3 kg/m2, 54% were overweight, 2% severely obese and 18% moderately so. Their mean BSA was 1.7 +/- 0.2 m2 and only 5% had a BSA > or = 2 m2. In the adjuvant chemotherapy subgroup, most patients received > or = 85% of their ideal dose. The mean dose reduction was 5.3 +/- 11.3% versus 9.9 +/- 11.3% in the BSA < 2 and > or = 2 m2 groups, respectively (p = 0.02), and 4.3 +/- 8.2% versus 6.7 +/- 13.1% in the BMI < 25 and > or = 25 kg/m2 groups, respectively (p = 0.008). While only 24% of chemotherapy dose reductions of > or = 15% were in the BSA > or = 2 m2 group, 76% were in the BMI > or = 25 kg/m2 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is prevalent in this breast cancer population. BSA is not a sensitive index of large body size. We consistently detected more frequent empiric dose reductions at cycle one of adjuvant chemotherapy, with reductions of greater magnitude in the largest women (BSA > or = 2 m2) and those who were overweight (BMI > or = 25 kg/m2).

Incidence, cost, and outcomes of bleeding and chemotherapy dose modification among solid tumor patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

To describe the incidence and outcomes of bleeding and chemotherapy dose modifications associated with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000/microL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six hundred nine patients with solid tumors or lymphoma were followed-up during 1,262 chemotherapy cycles complicated by thrombocytopenia for development of bleeding, delay or dose reduction of the subsequent cycle, survival, and resource utilization. The association between survival and bleeding or dose modification was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Predisposing factors were identified by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Bleeding occurred during 9% of cycles among patients with previous bleeding episodes (P <.0001), baseline platelets less than 75,000/microL (P <.0001), bone marrow metastases (P =.001), poor performance status (P =.03), and cisplatin, carboplatin, carmustine or lomustine administration (P =.0002). Major bleeding episodes resulted in shorter survival and higher resource utilization (P <.0001). Chemotherapy delays occurred during 6% of cycles among patients with more than five previous cycles (P =.003), radiotherapy (P =.03), and disseminated disease (P =.04). They experienced similar clinical outcomes but used significantly more resources. Dose reductions occurred during 15% of cycles but were not associated with poor clinical outcomes or excess resource utilization. Significantly shorter survival and higher resource utilization were observed among the 20% of patients who failed to achieve an adequate response to platelet transfusion.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of bleeding is low among solid tumor patients overall but exceeds 20% in some subgroups. These subgroups are easily identifiable using routinely available clinical information. A clinical prediction rule is being developed. Poor response to platelet transfusion is a clinically and financially significant downstream effect of thrombocytopenia and warrants further investigation.

Interferon alfa 2b as maintenance therapy in poor risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete remission after intensive CHOP-BLEO regimens

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the role of interferon alfa 2b (IFN) as maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with high or high-intermediate clinical risk on complete remission (CR) after CHOP-BLEO regimens.

METHODS

Patients were initially treated with CHOP-BLEO regimens (which include increased doses of cyclophosphamide and epirubicine, instead of doxorubicin). If the patients achieved CR they were randomly assigned to receive either maintenance therapy with IFN 5.0 MU, three times at week by 1 yr, or no treatment (control group).

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-three patients were considered as candidates for the study. They were of high (80%) or high-intermediate (20%) clinical risk; additionaly most patients had poor prognostic factors such as high levels of beta 2 microglobulin, lactic dehydrogenase levels, bulky disease (defined as a tumor mass >10 cm) or multiple extranodal involvement. In an intent-to-treat analysis all patients were evaluable to efficacy and toxicity. Median follow-up was 45 months, the estimated 5-yr overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) for patients who received IFN were 71% (95% confidence interval (CI): 61-83%) and 57% (95% CI: 39-69%), respectively, values which were not statistically different from the control group: 69% (95% CI: 63-79%) and 54% (95% CI: 37-63%), respectively (p=0.2). Toxicity was mild.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that IFN used as maintenance therapy at these doses and schedules is not useful in aggressive malignant lymphoma when more intensive chemotherapy has been employed during induction treatment. Nevertheless, follow-up is too short, and long-term follow-up would be necessary in order to draw definitive conclusions. Probably, an multicenter study is necessary to define the role of IFN as maintenance therapy in this patient setting.

A randomized trial of amifostine in patients with high-dose VIC chemotherapy plus autologous blood stem cell transplantation

This pilot study evaluates the degree of side effects during high-dose chemotherapy (HD-VIC) plus autologous bone marrow transplant (HDCT) and its possible prevention by the cytoprotective thiol-derivate amifostine. Additionally, the in-patient medical costs of both treatment arms were compared. 40 patients with solid tumours were randomized to receive HD-VIC chemotherapy with or without amifostine (910 mg/m(2)at day 1-3) given as a short infusion prior to carboplatin and ifosfamide. Patients were stratified according to pretreatment. HDCT consisted of an 18 h infusion of carboplatin (500 mg/m(2/)d over 18 h), ifosfamide (4 g/m(2)/d over 4 h) and etoposide (500 mg/m(2)/d) all given for 3 consecutive days. All patients received prophylactic application of G-CSF (5 microg kg(-1)subcutaneously) to ameliorate neutropenia after treatment. Patients were monitored for nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal side effects, haematopoietic recovery, as well as frequency of fever and infections. The median fall of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 10% from baseline in the amifostine group (105 to 95 ml min(-1)) and 37% in the control patient group (107 to 67 ml min(-1)) (P< 0.01). Amifostine-treated patients revealed a less pronounced increase in albumin and low molecular weight protein urinary excretion. Stomatitis grade III/IV occurred in 25% without versus 0% of patients with amifostine (P = 0.01). Acute nausea/vomiting was frequently observed immediately during or after the application of amifostine despite intensive antiemetic prophylaxis consisting of 5-HT3-receptor antagonists/dexamethasone/trifluorpromazine. However, delayed emesis occurred more often in the control patients. Engraftment of neutrophil (> 500 microl(-1))and thrombocytes (> 25 000 microl(-1))were observed at days 9 versus 10 and 10 versus 12, respectively, both slightly in favour of the amifostine arm. In addition, a lower number of days with fever and a shortened duration of hospital stay were observed in the amifostine arm. The reduction of acute toxicity observed in the amifostine arm resulted in 30% savings in costs for supportive care (Euro 4396 versus Euro 3153 per patient). Taking into account the drug costs of amifostine, calculation of in-patient treatment costs from the start of chemotherapy to discharge revealed additional costs of Euro 540 per patient in the amifostine arm. This randomized pilot study indicates that both organ and haematotoxicity of HD-VIC chemotherapy can be ameliorated by the use of amifostine. Additionally, a nearly complete preservation of GFR was observed in amifostine-treated patients which may be advantageous if repetitive cycles of HDCT are planned. Larger randomized trials evaluating amifostine cytoprotection during high-dose chemotherapy are warranted.

Received dose and dose-intensity of chemotherapy and outcome in nonmetastatic extremity osteosarcoma. European Osteosarcoma Intergroup

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between received dose, received dose-intensity (RDI), and survival in patients with osteosarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1983 and 1993, the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) conducted two randomized trials involving patients with high-grade, nonmetastatic, biopsy-proven osteosarcoma of the extremity. These trials shared a common treatment arm of doxorubicin (DOX) 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin (CDDP) 100 mg/m(2) planned for six cycles at 3-week intervals. Definitive surgery was scheduled at week 9, after three cycles. Survival time was calculated from 122 days, the scheduled end of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients randomized to DOX/CDDP received at least one cycle of chemotherapy, and 232 (81%) received all six cycles. On average, 79% of the intended dose of DOX and 80% of the intended dose of CDDP was given. Mean time to completion of chemotherapy was 1.27 times that specified by the protocol. Mean RDI was 0.64 for DOX (SD = 0.19) and 0.65 for CDDP (SD = 0.18). Progression-free survival was lower for those who received one to five cycles compared with those who completed all six cycles (hazards ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.78). Survival and progression-free survival were lowest for patients with RDI less than 0.6, although these differences were not statistically significant at the 5% level. There was no clear evidence of preoperative dose or dose-intensity influencing histologic response.

CONCLUSION

This analysis did not establish a clear survival benefit for increasing received dose or dose-intensity in the context of this two-drug regimen. The hypothesis that increasing dose-intensity may improve survival in osteosarcoma requires prospective evaluation.

Effective treatment of a patient with a high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with an accelerated regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel

The rarity of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) and its poor response to treatment provides fertile ground for investigational therapies. An accelerated regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel is investigated. A patient with a recent history of treated tuberculosis of the lung represented with infertility and acute abdominal pain from suspected fibroids, and underwent a laparotomy with a diagnosis of a high-grade ESS. A novel therapeutic approach using a regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel with the reinfusion of filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells is described. A partial response was observed following six cycles of chemotherapy. Grade IV thrombocytopenia occurred after the last cycle, with recovery prior to pelvic radiotherapy. The patient remained well 1 year post-diagnosis. High-grade ESS is responsive to combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin, and requires further evaluation. The use of an accelerated regimen may also have contributed to the response and this question awaits randomized trials.

Randomized phase II study of FEC day 1 + 8 and FEC day 1 in patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens without stem cell support have not resulted in an improved survival compared to standard dose regimens in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Combinations of an anthracycline, cyclophosphamide and 5 fluorouracil are still standard in such patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the two different schedules of epirubicin in a standard dose FEC regimen with respect to response and toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive a day 1 + 8 schedule (5FU and CTX 500mg/m2 day 1, epirubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1 and 8) or a day 1 schedule (5FU, CTX 500 mg/m2 and epirubicin 80 mg/m2 day 1), q day 21, both given without hematopoietic growth factors. A total of 104 eligible patients were analyzed, 52 in each arm.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher relative dose-intensity was found for the day 1 schedule compared to the day 1 + 8 schedule. Although the trial was not set up to reliably detect a difference in response rate, this difference in relative dose-intensity in favour of the day 1 schedule does not suggest any improvement in response rate or duration of response for the day 1 schedule. Myelosuppression was severe in the day 1 + 8 schedule. We conclude that a day 1 + 8 FEC schedule has no advantage over a day 1 FEC schedule without hematopoietic growth factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Quantitative assessment of retroviral transfer of the human multidrug resistance 1 gene to human mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells engrafted in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice

Mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are a potential target for the retrovirus-mediated transfer of cytostatic drug-resistance genes. We analyzed nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mouse-repopulating CD34+ PBPC from patients with cancer after retroviral transduction in various cytokine combinations with the hybrid vector SF-MDR, which is based on the Friend mink cell focus-forming/murine embryonic stem-cell virus and carries the human multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene. Five to 13 weeks after transplantation of CD34+ PBPC into NOD/SCID mice (n = 84), a cell dose-dependent multilineage engraftment of human leukocytes up to an average of 33% was observed. The SF-MDR provirus was detected in the bone marrow (BM) and in its granulocyte fractions in 96% and 72%, respectively, of chimeric NOD/SCID mice. SF-MDR provirus integration assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was optimal in the presence of Flt-3 ligand/thrombopoietin/stem-cell factor, resulting in a 6-fold (24% ± 5% [mean ± SE]) higher average proportion of gene-marked human cells in NOD/SCID mice than that achieved with IL-3 alone (P &lt; .01). A population of clearly rhodamine-123dull human myeloid progeny cells could be isolated from BM samples from chimeric NOD/SCID mice. On the basis of PCR and rhodamine-123 efflux data, up to 18% ± 4% of transduced cells were calculated to express the transgene. Our data suggest that the NOD/SCID model provides a valid assay for estimating the gene-transfer efficiency to repopulating human PBPC that may be achievable in clinical autologous transplantation. P-glycoprotein expression sufficient to prevent marrow aplasia in vivo may be obtained with this SF-MDR vector and an optimized transduction protocol.

Outcome of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated at a private medical oncology clinic

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast carcinoma usually is fatal. The median survival after recurrence is 2 years. Five-year survival after recurrence is approximately 10-20%. Although encouraging data have been reported from clinical trials, two issues confound the translation of clinical research to the general medical community: patient selection bias and the absence of untreated controls. Therefore, the authors examined their community-based metastatic breast carcinoma patients, comparing their results with reports from clinical trials and with untreated historic controls.

METHODS

This was a nonconcurrent cohort study of 407 community-based metastatic breast carcinoma patients treated at the authors' private medical oncology clinic in northeast Louisiana. Prognostic variables were correlated with survival time.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis of breast carcinoma was 61 years. The median age at the time of first recurrence was 65 years. The median overall survival and median survival after recurrence were 4. 5 years and 20.1 months, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 17% and 2.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical trial participants and the authors' private practice cohort are incommensurable, outcomes in these disparate groups were similar but, unfortunately, not much different from those of untreated historic controls.

Intensified Adjuvant IFADIC Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Prospective Randomized Feasibility Trial

Purpose. The present prospective randomized adjuvant trial was carried out to compare the toxicity, feasibility and efficacy of augmented chemotherapy added to hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy after wide or marginal resection of grade 2 and grade 3 soft tissue sarcoma (STS).Patients and methods. Fifty-nine patients underwent primary surgery by wide or marginal excision and were subsequently randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or under the addition of six courses of ifosfamide (1500 mg/m(2) , days 1-4), dacarbazine (DTIC) (200 mg/m(2) , days 1-4) and doxorubicin (25 mg/m(2) , days 1-2) administered in 14-day-intervals supported by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (30 x 10(6) IU/day, s.c.) on days 5-13. According to the randomization protocol, 28 patients received radiotherapy only, whereas 31 patients were treated with additional chemotherapy.Results. The relative ifosfamide-doxorubicin-DTIC (IFADIC) dose intensity achieved was 93%. After a mean observation period of 41+/-19.7 months (range, 8.1-84 months), 16 patients (57%) in the control group versus 24 patients (77%) in the chemotherapy group were free of disease (p>0.05).Within the control group, tumor relapses occurred in 12 patients (43%;six patients with distant metastases, two with local relapse, four with both) versus seven patients (23%; five patients with distant metastases, one with local recurrence, one with both) from the chemotherapy group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) (p=0.1), time to local failure (TLF) (p=0.09), time to distant failure (TDF) (p=0.17) as well as overall survival (OS) (p=0.4) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Treatment-related toxicity was generally mild in both treatment arms.Conclusion. We conclude that the safety profile of intensified IFADIC added to radiotherapy was manageable and tolerable in the current setting. Inclusion of intensified IFADIC was not translated into a significant benefit concerning OS, RFS, TLF andTDF as compared with radiotherapy only, although a potential benefit of chemotherapy for grade 3 STS patients needs to be validated in prospective randomized trials including larger patient numbers.

Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology surveys regarding ASCO clinical practice guidelines. Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

PURPOSE

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee sought to assess whether more appropriate patterns of colony-stimulating factor (CSF) use occurred after the publication of ASCO evidence-based practice guidelines in 1994 and 1996 for patients with solid tumors or lymphoma.

METHODS

In 1994 and 1997, questionnaires describing clinical scenarios were mailed to ASCO members who practiced medical oncology. Physicians were asked the extent to which they preferred to use a CSF for primary prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis, or treatment of neutropenic complications. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine predictors of overall propensity to use CSFs and, when using a CSF, propensity to support longer schedules of CSF use.

RESULTS

Decreased use of CSFs was shown in the following situations: (1) treatment for febrile neutropenia without localizing signs (39% in 1994 v 29% in 1997) or with a right lower lobe infiltrate (54% v 46%); (2) primary prophylaxis with paclitaxel for ovarian cancer (20% v 11%) or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (8.4% v 4.6%); and (3) secondary prophylaxis after afebrile neutropenia following chemotherapy for germ cell tumors (44.5% v 36.0%). One third fewer physicians supported the extended use of CSFs until an absolute neutrophil count >/= 10,000/mm(3) or a WBC count >/= 10,000/mm(3) was reached, both counts serving as criteria for stopping CSF therapy. However, we observed high rates of CSF use despite ASCO guideline recommendations against use in the following clinical situations: (1) primary prophylaxis in patients at low risk of febrile neutropenia (6% v 16%); (2) secondary prophylaxis late in the course of curative and palliative therapy (80% v 53%); and (3) treatment of afebrile and uncomplicated febrile neutropenia (30% v 60%). In 1994 and 1997, fee-for-service physicians were more likely than other physicians to prefer use of CSF support while maintaining treatment dose and schedule instead of using dose-reduction strategies, and, when using a CSF, they were more likely to support longer CSF treatment schedules (P <.05 for both scenarios).

CONCLUSION

Decreased use and more appropriate use of CSFs in accordance with ASCO guideline recommendations occurred from 1994 to 1997, but there remain many opportunities to reduce CSF use with no clinical harm. Many oncologists continue to support the use of CSFs in scenarios and with scheduling criteria that the guidelines and evidence do not support. ASCO's evidence-based guidelines should be linked with formal continuous quality improvement initiatives to substantially improve the quality of supportive oncology care.

Dose-Intensive Melphalan With Stem Cell Support (MEL100) Is Superior to Standard Treatment in Elderly Myeloma Patients

A clinical relationship between dose-intensity of melphalan and response rate has been demonstrated in multiple myeloma. Promising results have been reported after 200 mg/m2 melphalan, especially in younger patients. It is uncertain whether 100 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL100) can offer similar results in older patients. To address this issue, patients were treated with 2 or 3 MEL100 courses followed by stem cell support. Seventy-one patients (median age, 64 years) entered the protocol at diagnosis. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 71 pair mates (median age, 64 years) selected from patients treated at diagnosis with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) and matched for age and β2-microglobulin. Complete remission was 47% after MEL100 and 5% after MP. Median event-free survival was 34 months in the MEL100 group and 17.7 months in the MP group (P &lt; .001). Median overall survival was 56+ months for MEL100 and 48 months for MP (P&lt; .01). In a multivariate analysis, β2-microglobulin levels and MEL100 were independent risk factors associated with outcome: superior event-free and overall survival were observed in patients presenting low β2-microglobulin levels at diagnosis and receiving MEL100 as induction regimen. In conclusion, MEL100 was superior to MP in terms of complete remission rate, event-free survival, and overall survival.

Dose-Intensive Melphalan With Stem Cell Support (MEL100) Is Superior to Standard Treatment in Elderly Myeloma Patients

A clinical relationship between dose-intensity of melphalan and response rate has been demonstrated in multiple myeloma. Promising results have been reported after 200 mg/m2 melphalan, especially in younger patients. It is uncertain whether 100 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL100) can offer similar results in older patients. To address this issue, patients were treated with 2 or 3 MEL100 courses followed by stem cell support. Seventy-one patients (median age, 64 years) entered the protocol at diagnosis. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 71 pair mates (median age, 64 years) selected from patients treated at diagnosis with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) and matched for age and β2-microglobulin. Complete remission was 47% after MEL100 and 5% after MP. Median event-free survival was 34 months in the MEL100 group and 17.7 months in the MP group (P < .001). Median overall survival was 56+ months for MEL100 and 48 months for MP (P< .01). In a multivariate analysis, β2-microglobulin levels and MEL100 were independent risk factors associated with outcome: superior event-free and overall survival were observed in patients presenting low β2-microglobulin levels at diagnosis and receiving MEL100 as induction regimen. In conclusion, MEL100 was superior to MP in terms of complete remission rate, event-free survival, and overall survival.

Risks, costs, and alternatives to platelet transfusions

The use of platelet transfusions has increased greatly in the past decade and is likely to continue to escalate because of the risks of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving dose-intensive cancer chemotherapy, the increased use of hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, and the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Despite marked advances in procedures for ensuring the safety of platelets, including intensive donor screening, infectious disease marker testing, and increased use of leukodepletion techniques, platelet transfusions carry a significant risk for immunologic disorders and transmission of bacterial, viral, and perhaps other diseases and can entail a very high cost. In addition, thrombocytopenia has the potential to interfere with delivery of chemotherapy on schedule and at the planned doses, thus potentially compromising treatment outcome. The limitations of platelet transfusions have prompted the development of agents with the potential to stimulate platelet production and thus reduce or eliminate the need for transfusions. Two such agents, interleukin-11 (IL-11) and thrombopoietin (TPO), have demonstrated promise in clinical trials. In November, 1997, IL-11 received FDA approval for the prevention of severe thrombocytopenia in high risk patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Thrombopoietic growth factors have the potential to greatly simplify and increase the safety of transfusion medicine.

The role of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer remains a devastating and largely incurable disease. Currently available therapies offer meaningful palliation for many and modest prolongation of survival for some patients. Single-agent hormonal therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with ER-positive disease, with sequential use of further hormonal agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy at the time of disease progression. Chemotherapy is appropriate as initial therapy for patients with receptor-negative or rapidly progressive visceral disease. Although combination regimens may increase response rates, the lack of survival benefit does not justify the increased toxicity of aggressive combination regimens in most patients. Maintenance chemotherapy deserves consideration in selected well-informed patients, especially those with few therapy-related side effects. High-dose regimens confer substantial toxicity with no clear therapeutic advantage and cannot be recommended outside of ongoing trials. New chemotherapy agents offer the hope of effective salvage therapy with acceptable toxicity to a larger number of patients. Perhaps most promising, the development of targeted, biologically based therapies such as rhuMAbHER2 offers encouragement for the future.

Increasing dose intensity of cisplatin-etoposide in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a phase III randomized trial of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

The authors designed this randomized, controlled trial to assess whether dose intensification of a cisplatin-etoposide combination (PE), achieved by shortening the interval between chemotherapy cycles, would improve response rate and survival. The maximum tolerated dose of PE was administered in either 3- or 4-week cycles to patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

One hundred twenty-three patients were randomized into two groups. The dose-intense arm received cisplatin 35 mg/m2 and etoposide 200 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 every 4 weeks. The dose-dense arm received the same schedule every 3 weeks along with 5 microg/kg of recombinant human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) administered subcutaneously on Days 4-13.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were well balanced in both treatment arms. Fifty-four percent of patients were classified as Stage IIIB. A 32% increase in relative dose intensity was achieved in the dose-dense arm compared with the dose-intense arm. The response rates were 32% in the dose-intense arm and 27% in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.9). The median overall survival was higher in the dose-dense arm, 9 versus 7.2 months (P = 0.2). The main toxicity was myelosuppression, although the administration of GM-CSF significantly reduced the percentage of patients with Grade 4 granulocytopenia (53% vs. 78%). Fifty-four percent of the patients in the dose-intense arm and 35% of those in the dose-dense arm developed febrile neutropenia (P = 0.07). There were ten (8%) treatment-related deaths, three (4%) in the dose-intense arm and seven (12%) in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.3); three deaths in each arm were due to febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose-intensification achieved in the dose-dense PE regimen did not correlate with significant improvements in response rate or survival and cannot be recommended in the light of the diversity of new drug combinations available today. However, the use of rhGM-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of severe granulocytopenia.

Dose-intensive first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin and continuous infusion ifosfamide in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a phase II study

This phase II study was designed to verify the activity and safety of an intensive epirubicin/ifosfamide schedule in untreated soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients by using both the agents at the identified maximal tolerated doses. 39 adult patients were treated with epirubicin at 55 mg/m2, on days 1 and 2 (total dose per cycle 110 mg/m2) combined with ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2 days 1-4 (total dose per cycle 10 g/m2), with equidose mesna uroprotection and G-CSF support. Treatment was given on an ambulatory basis, at 3-week intervals. The overall objective response (OR) rate was 59% (95% confidence interval, CI, 43-72%), with 5 complete responses (13%) at 18 partial responses (46%); 12 partial responders were rendered disease-free following surgery. The median survival time was 19 months, being 23 and 13 months, respectively, for responding and non-responding patients. The median time to response was 40 days (range 21-60). Treatment-related toxicity was overall acceptable. The OR of 59% was the highest ever reported in our consecutive studies in advanced STS, confirming that improved therapeutic efficacy can be obtained with intensified regimens in such a disease; both the response duration and survival were also longer. The observed activity proved to be interesting with regard to the high response rate in the lung (86%), as well as the proportion of patients rendered disease-free by early surgery after the achievement of a partial response (55%). Both these findings may be important in the multimodality approach to patients with lesions potentially resectable for cure.

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with five days bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

This multicenter phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, aged 18-70, with performance status < or = 2, normal baseline biological values and no prior chemotherapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 6 months before study entry) were selected. Treatment was irinotecan 350 mg/m2, i.v., day 1, alternating with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m2, i.v. daily for five consecutive days, day 22-26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One alternating cycle was to be performed every six weeks. Patients were evaluated for efficacy every alternating cycle. Treatment was administered until five alternating cycles, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (28 chemotherapy-naïve and five with prior adjuvant treatment completed > 1 year prior to accrual) were enrolled. The objective response rate (RR) was 30% (95% CI: 16-49; 10 patients/33; nine partial response and one complete response). All responses were reviewed by an independent external review committee. An additional 49% of patients had stable disease. The median survival was 16 months, the one year survival amounted to 58% and the median progression free survival was 7.2 months. Relative dose intensity was nearly 90% for both drugs. Grade 3-4 diarrhea and neutropenia were the most frequent severe toxic events, seen in 24% and 64% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The alternating schedule of CPT-11 350 mg/m2 with five days bolus of 5-FU and low dose LV is an active and feasible regimen as front-line therapy for metastatic CRC. It is well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping toxicity. The response rate appears promising with regard to that expected with either single agent. This regimen warrants further assessment in randomized trials.

Dose-Intensified Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Present and Future Prospects

With the trend to maximize chemotherapy in breast cancer, the use of peripheral blood stem cells in addition to hematopoietic growth factors to alleviate myelosuppression caused by dose-intensified chemotherapy has been shown to be beneficial. In treatment of metastatic breast cancer, response rates and complete response rates as high as 100%and nearly 80%, respectively, have been reported. Such treatments have shown even greater promise in an adjuvant setting for high-risk breast cancer. High-dose chemotherapy studies, however, involve highly-selected patient populations who are generally compared with unselected patients, and controversy still surrounds the question of whether it is substantially superior to conventional-dose chemotherapy. There are now more than sufficient data to justify ongoing randomized trials, and the most important overall recommedation is to encourage patients to participate in these clinical trials.

High-dose therapy for diffuse large-cell lymphoma in first remission

Diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL) is curable by first-line conventional chemotherapy in 50%-60% of patients. High-dose therapy makes no contribution to this group of patients and, if applied indiscriminately as first-line consolidation therapy, is likely to unnecessarily increase overall morbidity and mortality. Instead, recent interest has been directed towards (a) the identification of a group of patients with a poor prognosis, and (b) the intensification of first-line treatment for such patients with high-dose therapy and allied regimens. Many prognostic factors have now been standardised, while studies are progressing in the identification of newer prognostic factors, such as the molecular markers. Multi-centre randomised trials are currently in progress to determine the appropriate level of treatment for prognostic subsets, with the value of high-dose therapy being assessed for those in the worst prognostic groups.

Cellular survival pathways and resistance to cancer therapy

Chemotherapy and irradiation induce programmed cell death (apoptosis) in their target cells. Dysregulated apoptosis is a feature that is selected for during tumor formation and contributes to therapeutic resistance. Cell survival in the face of cytotoxic therapy is dictated by both internal properties of the cell, such as status of components of the apoptotic machinery, and its extracellular milieu, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) and growth factor receptor expression and signaling. The importance of extracellular survival signals as key regulators of apoptosis is now being recognized by the ability of growth factors (GFs), GF receptors (GFRs), and GFR signaling to promote cellular survival. GFs can mitigate or abrogate the effectiveness of cancer therapy and protect against other cellular insults. Because survival signals generated by different extracellular sources converge at key molecules, new molecular targets have been identified which could be exploited to maximize the effectiveness of cytotoxic cancer therapy.