Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

Third-generation chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To estimate the efficacy of third-generation (3G) chemotherapy agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) on response and survival in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through MEDLINE. Results on tumor response and survival were collected from randomized trials comparing 3G monotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC), 3G monotherapy versus second-generation (2G) platinum-based regimens, and 3G platinum-based regimens versus 2G platinum-based regimens.

RESULTS

Of the 2480 citations screened, 20 randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 19 trials were used in the analyses. The data from two, three-arm trials were used in two different comparisons. Five trials (n = 1029 patients) compared 3G monotherapy with BSC. The summary risk difference (RD) for 1-year survival favored 3G agents by 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 12%). Four trials (n = 871 patients) compared treatment with 3G monotherapy versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The response RD was -6% (95% CI: -11%, 0%), and the 1-year survival rate RD was 3% (95% CI: -3%, 10%), suggesting that despite a slightly higher response rate for 2G platinum-based regimens relative to 3G monotherapy, there is equivalency in survival. Twelve trials (n = 3995) compared 3G versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The RD for response was 12% (95% CI: 10%, 15%). A RD for 1-year was not calculated, because of heterogeneity among the trials. A subset analysis of 3G versus 2G platinum-based doublets revealed a 1-year survival-rate RD of 6% (95% CI: 2%, 10%), favoring 3G platinum-based regimens without evidence of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

3G agents have been a significant advance in the treatment of NSCLC.

[Pharmacoeconomic assessment of taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer]

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of taxane-containing regimens versus non-taxane-containing regimens using a metanalysis and its subsequent pharmacoeconomic assessment to define the role of taxanes as first-line therapy for non micro-cytic lung cancer.

METHOD

A search of the MEDLINE database from 2000 to June 2005 was performed. The search was restricted to phase-III clinical trials, and 29 papers were selected. Effectivity measures considered included: objective response, 1- and 2-year survival. Maentel-Haenszel combined odds ratio (OR) was estimated in the metanalysis. The statistical analysis of effectiveness across categories was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were statistically considered for p values = 0.01. All results obtained were weighted according to number of patients.

RESULTS

OR estimates for the various effectiveness variables showed statistically significant differences when 2-year survival was considered both for taxanes in general and docetaxel specifically versus non-taxane regimens. These same results are seen when the effectiveness analysis is performed using ANOVA. For the pharmacoeconomic analysis taxane-free regimens were considered as reference, this being of choice for comparisons versus paclitaxel-containing regimens whereas the selection of docetaxel-containing schemes represents additional costs per extra effectiveness unit that oscillate between 26,559 and 96,527 (2-year survival and objective response, respectively) versus taxane-free regimens. The sensitivity analysis ultimately confirmed our study s results.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, taxane-containing schemes are valid therapeutic options, but at a very high cost.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: the past, the present and the future

Complete resection is mandatory in order to achieve a cure in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite complete resection, a substantial proportion of patients have disease recurrence, with distant metastases being the primary sites of failure. Recent trials have conclusively demonstrated the benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy in patients with resected stage IB and II NSCLC. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage III NSCLC is less clear, with trials showing conflicting results. The role of targeted agents in this setting is being investigated. Gene expression profiling studies should help direct chemotherapy to those who would actually benefit from it, thereby saving others from unnecessary toxicity.

Cetuximab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major problem in the western civilization and developing countries. Since most patients with NSCLC have advanced disease at diagnosis, to date, chemotherapy, with third-generation platinum-based doublets, represents the standard of care. Advances in the knowledge of tumour biology and mechanisms of oncogenesis has granted the singling out of several molecular targets for NSCLC treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of ErbB family, is one of the most studied target. Cetuximab is a chimeric (human-murine) monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the EGFR that blocks ligand (TGF-alpha, EGF) access to the receptor. In the present paper we discuss about the activity, tolerability and efficacy of cetuximab, the EGFR monoclonal blocking antibody with the largest amount of clinical data being available on the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Changes in the natural history of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC)--comparison of outcomes and characteristics in patients with advanced NSCLC entered in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials before and after 1990

BACKGROUND

Demographic factors and treatment regimens were evaluated in relation to differences in outcome between patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were diagnosed and treated on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II and III trials from 1981 to 1990 and from 1991 to 2000.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 6 advanced NSCLC trials were identified between 1981 and 1990, and 3 trials were identified after 1990. Patient characteristics (n = 3398 patients) and other clinical outcomes were analyzed, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients who entered on trials after 1990 more likely were women, received a cisplatin-containing regimen, had a performance status of 0 or 1, had Stage IIIB (vs. Stage IV) disease, had tumors with adenocarcinoma histology, had weight loss < or = 10%, and had pulmonary-only metastases (although more total metastases and brain metastases) compared with patients who were diagnosed before 1990. OS was longer post-1990 than pre-1990 (8.2 months vs. 5.8 months pre-1990), and PFS was longer post-1990 (3.5 months vs. 2.6 months pre-1990; P<.001 for both). In addition, the median interval from the date of disease progression to death increased by nearly 62% in the later decade.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved survival in more recent NSCLC trials was explained in part by the enrollment of patients with more favorable prognostic factors. A change in the natural history of the disease was reflected by some of these changes, including increased numbers of women with the disease and changes in the patterns of metastases. Changes in eligibility criteria also accounted for some improvements in prognostic factors and improved second line therapies in the later decade. Thus, the survival improvements are likely to be multifactorial, with improved therapies also playing a major role.

Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Korean Cancer Study Group experience

BACKGROUND

Several randomized trials have demonstrated superior response rates and survivals for new agent platinum doublets than for older platinum doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, few trials have been performed in Asian populations. Thus, we conducted a randomized study to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) with etoposide-cisplatin (EP) in Korean patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, or etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days in both groups. The primary endpoint was response rate.

RESULTS

Between May 2000 and December 2001, 83 patients at 9 Korean centers were enrolled in this study. The GP arm showed a significantly higher response rate (52.6% versus 19.4%; P = 0.002), a longer time to progression (4.3 months in both arms; P = 0.018) and a marginally significant prolongation of overall survival (18.3 months versus 10.9 months; P = 0.059) than the EP arm. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (18% versus 0%) was more common in the GP arm whereas grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was more common in EP arm (48.7% versus 71.8%). Other toxicities were comparable in both arms.

CONCLUSION

GP provided a significantly higher response rate and a longer time to progression than EP and should be considered a standard treatment in advanced NSCLC in Korean population.

Safety profile of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be considered typical of advanced age. More than 50% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed at > 65 years of age and approximately one-third of all patients are > 70 years of age. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterpart because of the progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive platinum-based chemotherapy, the standard medical treatment for advanced NSCLC. In clinical practice, single-agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. Feasibility of platinum-based chemotherapy remains an open issue and has to be proven prospectively. Moreover, a multidimensional geriatric assessment for individualised treatment choice in NSCLC elderly patients is mandatory. This review focuses on the currently-available evidences for the treatment of elderly patients affected by advanced NSCLC with regards to the role and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Pharmacoeconomics of Systemic Therapies for Lung Cancer

The purpose of this article is to review the economics of systemic therapies for the treatment of lung cancer. Lung cancer treatment is moderately expensive. The overall cost to society is significant given its high incidence. Most analyses in patients with small cell lung cancer focus on supportive care measures. The economics of chemotherapy in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer, as assessed in one study, shows alternating chemotherapy to be cost effective. Numerous economic analyses of chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been completed using varying methodologies in a number of countries. In patients with advanced NSCLC, third generation chemotherapy in the first-line setting can be administered within reasonable incremental cost effectiveness. Single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy in the second-line setting has also been shown to fall within a reasonable cost-effective range. Based on this review, systemic therapies for lung cancer are, for the most part, cost effective. Information on the cost-utility of systemic therapies is more limited. In a population of cancer patients with poor prognosis, the inclusion of quality indicators in the calculation of costs (i.e. cost-utility analyses) will be of great importance to refine our understanding of costs and benefits using a more global approach. Future economic analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy and novel targeted therapies will be of great interest.

Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of irinotecan plus paclitaxel administered on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks, in untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 56 patients with inoperable or metastatic stage III and IV NSCLC with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis were enrolled. None of the patients had undergone prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Treatment involved irinotecan 125 mg m⁻² and paclitaxel 135 mg m⁻² administered on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks for a planned number of nine cycles. With a standard dose of paclitaxel at 135 mg m⁻², the dosage of irinotecan was escalated at four levels: 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg m⁻²; 125 mg m⁻² was established as the maximum tolerated dose; this dosage was administered to 46 patients. A total of 52 patients (median age 65 years, range 38–77 years) were assessable for toxicity and survival and 46 for response rate. Out of 46 evaluable patients, 19 achieved partial response (41.3%), 17 had stable disease (37%) and 10 (21.7%) experienced disease progression. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 2–9+ months). The main adverse reactions were myelotoxicity (grades 3 and 4) in 10 (19.2%) patients and diarrhoea (grade 3) in four (7.7%) patients. Irinotecan combined with paclitaxel, administered every 2 weeks, appears to be an effective treatment for advanced-stage NSCLC.

A Phase II Study of the Docetaxel–Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The efficacy of the docetaxel-carboplatin combination chemotherapy was studied in various phase II studies. Based on these data we aimed to test the regimen in previously untreated patients with advanced advanced non-smoking lung cancer (NSCLC) with docetaxel 80 mg/m2 a standard dose of carboplatin at AUC = 5, in an attempt to define the efficacy and tolerability of the combination in an open-label phase II study. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC stage IIIB and IV were candidates for the present study. Docetaxel was administered at 80 mg/m2 over 1 h by intravenous (IV) infusion followed by carboplatin AUC = 5 in 30 min IV infusion, both on day 1, and recycled every 21 days. Sixty patients received 263 courses of therapy in total; 231/263 (88%) were administered according to the planned doses, and 48/60 (80%) patients received chemotherapy without decrement of the dose; 32/263 (12%) of the courses were administered with a 10%-30% dose reduction. Complete responses (CR) were seen in 5 patients (8.3%) and partial responses (PR) in 16 patients (26.7%) for an overall response rate of 35%. Median duration of response was 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI)-7.1-7.9], time to progression (TIP) 11.5 months (95% CI-8.2-14.8), median overall survival (OS) 15.0 months (95% CI-10.8-19.2). One-year survival was 61.7%. Toxicity was acceptable; it was calculated according to the administered cycles and was mainly neutropenia: grade 3, 9% and grade 4, 2%; anemia: grade 3, 8%; nausea and vomiting: grade 3, 8%. The outpatient regimen of docetaxel-carboplatin is effective with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline

This evidence-based practice guideline on the use of paclitaxel (Taxol) or docetaxel (Taxotere) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who are candidates for palliative first-line chemotherapy is based on a systematic search and review of literature published in full or in abstract form between 1985 and April 2005. Forty-five randomized trials, including 11 abstracts, were reviewed and clinicians in the province of Ontario, Canada, provided feedback on a draft version of the guideline. Two phase III trials detected a statistically significant survival advantage for a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with best supportive care versus best supportive care alone. Among the nine fully published phase III trials comparing platinum-based chemotherapies, taxane-platinum combinations achieved higher response rates compared with older chemotherapy combinations, although significantly longer survival was observed only for docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vindesine-cisplatin. Response rates and survival were generally not significantly different for taxane-platinum combinations compared with other current chemotherapy combinations, although the toxicity profile of the regimens varied. However, in one large trial, improved tumor response and modest survival and quality of life benefits were associated with docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vinorelbine-cisplatin. No statistically significant survival differences were detected in the three fully published phase III trials comparing a taxane-gemcitabine combination with a taxane-platinum regimen.

RECOMMENDATIONS

(i) paclitaxel or docetaxel combined with cisplatin is recommended as one of a number of chemotherapy options for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with a good performance status; (ii) carboplatin may be combined with a taxane if a patient is unable or unwilling to take cisplatin; (iii) a taxane-gemcitabine combination may be considered for patients with a contraindication to cisplatin and carboplatin; (iv) no firm recommendation can be made on the optimal dose and schedule of taxane-based chemotherapy; however, commonly used regimens include cisplatin 75 mg/m2 combined with either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24-h infusion) and carboplatin AUC 6 combined with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 (3-h infusion); (v) a single-agent taxane may be used if combination chemotherapy is considered inappropriate.

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) versus cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine (CGV) as first-line treatment in advanced non small cell lung cancer: Results of a prospective randomized phase II study

The objective of this study was to assess whether adding cisplatin to gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination improves the clinical outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC; age < or = 75 years: Karnofsky performance status > or = 60%, and with adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were randomized into 2 treatment groups to receive Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 (GV group), or cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (CGV group). All drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 every three weeks: From September 1999 to March 2003, 114 patients were enrolled. No statistically significant difference was observed in GV vs CGV group in objective response (37 versus 47%, respectively; P = 0.5), median time to progression (5 versus 5.8 months; P = 0.6), overall survival (9 versus 10 months; P = 0.9) and 1-year survival (26 versus 28%; P = 0.9). Conversely, toxicities were significantly higher for CGV, including grade 3-4 neutropenia (24 versus 45%); neutropenic fever (4 versus 14%, including one toxic death); grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (2 versus 14%); and grade 3-4 emesis (2 versus 14%). Our results suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is less toxic than three-drug combination with cisplatin while showing similar efficacy.

Health related quality of life outcomes in cancer clinical trials

Over the last decade, health related quality of life (HRQOL) investigations have become an increasingly important part of many cancer clinical trial research programs. This paper presents a review of all HRQOL studies published by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), one of the largest clinical trials organisations in Europe. The findings highlight 24 clinical trials that have been published to date, enrolling over 9000 patients. HRQOL is fully integrated into EORTC phase III trials. In many trials, HRQOL provides a valuable source of additional information useful to both clinician and patient when making treatment decisions. Furthermore, several trials have found that the combined use of clinical information along with HRQOL data has led to the development of new standards of care in several different cancer sites. With more than 40 ongoing HRQOL studies in the EORTC, we expect HRQOL to play an even greater role over the coming decade in helping establish the optimal treatment and care approach for cancer patients.

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We undertook to determine whether adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin prolongs overall survival among patients with completely resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with completely resected stage IB or stage II non-small-cell lung cancer to vinorelbine plus cisplatin or to observation. The primary end point was overall survival; principal secondary end points were recurrence-free survival and the toxicity and safety of the regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 482 patients underwent randomization to vinorelbine plus cisplatin (242 patients) or observation (240); 45 percent of the patients had pathological stage IB disease and 55 percent had stage II, and all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. In both groups, the median age was 61 years, 65 percent were men, and 53 percent had adenocarcinomas. Chemotherapy caused neutropenia in 88 percent of patients (including grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 7 percent) and death from toxic effects in two patients (0.8 percent). Nonhematologic toxic effects of chemotherapy were fatigue (81 percent of patients), nausea (80 percent), anorexia (55 percent), vomiting (48 percent), neuropathy (48 percent), and constipation (47 percent), but severe (grade 3 or greater) toxic effects were uncommon (<10 percent). Overall survival was significantly prolonged in the chemotherapy group as compared with the observation group (94 vs. 73 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; P=0.04), as was relapse-free survival (not reached vs. 46.7 months; hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.60; P<0.001). Five-year survival rates were 69 percent and 54 percent, respectively (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin has an acceptable level of toxicity and prolongs disease-free and overall survival among patients with completely resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

A Phase II Study of Docetaxel and Infusional Cisplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy of cisplatin (5-day continuous infusion) and docetaxel for the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-2 with measurable NSCLC. Patients received continuous infusion cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day on 5 days and bolus docetaxel 60 mg/m2/day (day 1; PiD therapy) at a 4-week interval.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were enrolled. The mean number of cycles administered per patient was 2, and ranged from 1 to 4. The response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval, 33.9-63.8%). The median survival time was 47 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 47%. The major toxic effects were grade 3 or 4, neutropenia (88%), leukopenia (81%), thrombocytopenia (14%) and anemia (42%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

PiD therapy was a well-tolerated and active regimen for patients with advanced NSCLC. The major toxicity was neutropenia.

Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing drug therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly recognized as an important outcome in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This article reviews HRQoL data from a literature search that identified 32 randomized trials of conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In common with much of the research in this area, interpretation of the data from some trials was limited by weaknesses in data collection and reporting of HRQoL results. Nevertheless, the trials comparing chemotherapy with best supportive care consistently identified that some components of HRQoL improved with chemotherapy, despite the associated toxicity of many of the regimens used. Novel targeted therapies promise efficacy without the toxicity typically observed with conventional chemotherapy, and this article also reviews HRQoL data from trials of gefitinib (IRESSA), the first epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor to have demonstrated prospectively defined, clinically meaningful improvements in disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients with advanced NSCLC. In all trials reviewed, HRQoL findings to date support the incorporation of well-validated measures of HRQoL and symptom improvement in all future trials of drug therapy in advanced NSCLC patients. Ideally, the trials should have a prospectively defined HRQoL hypothesis, include measures to improve compliance with HRQoL assessments, and address the clinical meaning of the HRQoL findings.

Induction Chemotherapy With Carboplatin–Paclitaxel Followed by Standard Radiotherapy With Concurrent Daily Low-Dose Cisplatin Plus Weekly Paclitaxel for Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Both induction chemotherapy and concurrent platinating agents have been shown to improve results of thoracic irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II study investigated activity and feasibility of a novel chemoradiation regimen, including platinum and paclitaxel, both as induction chemotherapy and concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy. Previously untreated patients with histologically/cytologically proven unresectable stage I-III NSCLC were eligible. Induction chemotherapy consisted of 2 courses of 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and carboplatin at AUC of 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks. From day 43, continuous thoracic irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions radiotherapy for 6 weeks) was given concurrently with daily cisplatin at a dose of 5 mg/m2 intravenously and weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 45 mg/m2 for 6 weeks. Fifteen patients were accrued in the first stage of the trial. According to the previous statistical considerations, accrual at the second stage of the study was halted as a result of the achievement an insufficient number of successes. Major toxicity of combined chemoradiation was grade III-IV esophagitis requiring hospitalization for artificial nutrition, which occurred in 58% of patients. Other toxicities included grade II-IV fatigue in 75% of patients and grade I-IV neuromuscular toxicity in 67%. Only 7 patients completed the treatment program as scheduled. Eight patients (53.3%; 95% confidence interval, 26.5-78.7%) had a major response (5 partial response, 3 complete response), 2 patients had disease progression, and 1 was stable at the end of treatment. Four patients died early. With a median follow up of 38 months, the median survival was 12 months. A combined chemoradiation program, including platinum and paclitaxel, appears difficult to deliver at full dose as a result of toxicity, mainly esophagitis. More active and less toxic combined modality treatments need to be developed for inoperable NSCLC.

Antitumor activity of erlotinib (OSI-774, Tarceva) alone or in combination in human non-small cell lung cancer tumor xenograft models

Our objective was the preclinical assessment of the pharmacokinetics, monotherapy and combined antitumor activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in athymic nude mice bearing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenograft models. Immunohistochemistry determined the HER1/EGFR status of the NSCLC tumor models. Pharmacokinetic studies assessed plasma drug concentrations of erlotinib in tumor- and non-tumor-bearing athymic nude mice. These were followed by maximum tolerated dose (MTD) studies for erlotinib and each chemotherapy. Erlotinib was then assessed alone and in combination with these chemotherapies in the NSCLC xenograft models. Complete necropsies were performed on most of the animals in each study to further assess antitumor or toxic effects. Erlotinib monotherapy dose-dependently inhibited tumor growth in the H460a tumor model, correlating with circulating levels of drug. There was antitumor activity at the MTD with each agent tested in both the H460a and A549 tumor models (erlotinib 100 mg/kg: 71 and 93% tumor growth inhibition; gemcitabine 120 mg/kg: 93 and 75% tumor growth inhibition; cisplatin 6 mg/kg: 81 and 88% tumor growth inhibition). When each compound was given at a fraction of the MTD, tumor growth inhibition was suboptimal. Combinations of gemcitabine or cisplatin with erlotinib were assessed at 25% of the MTD to determine efficacy. In both NSCLC models, doses of gemcitabine (30 mg/kg) or cisplatin (1.5 mg/kg) with erlotinib (25 mg/kg) at 25% of the MTD were well tolerated. For the slow growing A549 tumor, there was significant tumor growth inhibition in the gemcitabine/erlotinib and cisplatin/erlotinib combinations (above 100 and 98%, respectively), with partial regressions. For the faster growing H460a tumor, there was significant but less remarkable tumor growth inhibition in these same combinations (86 and 53% respectively). These results show that in NSCLC xenograft tumors with similar levels of EGFR expression, the antitumor activity of erlotinib is robust both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapies.

Integrating concurrent navelbine and cisplatin to hyperfractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with induction and consolidation chemotherapy: feasibility and activity results

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and toxicity of a new combination schedule based on concurrent navelbine, cisplatin and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with platinum and gemcitabine induction and consolidation chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 37 patients with pathological confirmed advanced NSCLC (non-surgical stages IIIA and IIIB) were included in the study. All of them were assessable for survival and 32 for response. The treatment schedule consisted of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) or carboplatin (400 mg/m2) on day 1 with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment was given every 28 days for two courses, followed by concurrent administration of accelerated modified hyperfractionated radiotherapy, with concomitant boost, with a total dose of 61.64 Gy administered for 5 weeks, with cisplatin and navelbine, for two courses, finally followed by two courses of the same initial chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Four patients achieved complete response (12.5%) and 14 (44%) partial response, for an overall objective response rate of 56.5%. After a minimum follow-up duration of 35.5 months, median progression free survival was 12.2 months. The median survival was 15.4 months with actuarial 1-, 2- and 3-year survival of 67, 21 and 15%, respectively. The main toxicity was hematological. There was esophagitis (grades III and IV) in 30% of the patients and there were two treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy in non-surgical NSCLC is an acceptable treatment modality. However, the toxicity was not negligible.

Pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the clinical data

Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeting antimetabolite that has first-line and second-line activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies have shown significant efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile of the combination of pemetrexed plus platinum as first-line therapy for NSCLC. Second-line activity against NSCLC was demonstrated in a phase III trial comparing single-agent pemetrexed with docetaxel; in that trial, survival was comparable between these agents but side effects were significantly less for patients who received pemetrexed. Pemetrexed is also an active agent against mesothelioma. A phase III trial comparing pemetrexed plus cisplatin with cisplatin alone showed for the first time a regimen that improves survival in this disease and led to FDA approval of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin for mesothelioma. As a radiosensitizer, pemetrexed has been well-tolerated when given concurrent with chest radiation, and a phase I study is under way assessing its tolerability in combination with carboplatin in this setting. Pemetrexed is clearly a useful agent in the treatment of thoracic malignancies, and is worthy of further study in combination with other drugs having novel mechanisms of action.

Outcomes research in cancer clinical trial cooperative groups: the RTOG model

BACKGROUND

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), a National Cancer Institute sponsored cancer clinical trials research cooperative, has recently formed an Outcomes Committee to assess a comprehensive array of clinical trial endpoints and factors impacting the net effect of therapy.

METHODS

To study outcomes in a consistent, comprehensive and coordinated manner, the RTOG Outcomes Committee developed a model to assess clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes important in clinical trials.

RESULTS

This paper reviews how the RTOG incorporates outcomes research into cancer clinical trials, and demonstrates utilization of the RTOG Outcomes Model to test hypotheses related to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this example, the clinical component of the model indicates that the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) improves survival but increases the risk of toxicity. The humanistic component indicates that esophagitis is the symptom impacting quality of life the greatest and may outweigh the benefits in elderly (> or =70 years) patients. The economic component of the model indicates that accounting for quality-adjusted survival, concurrent chemoRT for the treatment of NSCLC is within the range of economically acceptable recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The RTOG Outcomes Model guides a comprehensive program of research that systematically measures a triad of endpoints considered important to clinical trials research.

Chemotherapy in stage-IV NSCLC

Since cisplatin-based chemotherapy was proven to increase survival in advanced and metastatic NSCLC various new combinations have been tested. The third generation regimens which showed almost comparable efficacy among each other in randomised trials often proved a better response rate and time to progression combined with a remarkable reduction of toxic side effects compared to "classic" combinations, whereas most studies only noted a modest increase in survival. Two-drug regimens were more effective than monotherapy but at the expense of significantly increased toxicity, while monotherapy compared to BSC improved quality of life and survival. The novel antifolate Pemetrexed proved comparable activity to docetaxel with significantly reduced toxicities.

Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Vinorelbine Combination Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Vinorelbine-cisplatin combination chemotherapy is a standard approach for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The addition of paclitaxel as a third therapeutic agent seems promising. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this new regimen. Forty-six nonselected and chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were treated every 4 weeks with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 given iv in 3 hours) and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 given iv in 6 hours) on day 1 and vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 given iv in 30 minutes) on days 1 and 15. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and response according to the intent-to-treat principle. An objective response was observed in 39% of the patients (95% CI: 25% to 55%). World Health Organization grade III to IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 43%, 2%, and 17%, respectively. There was one treatment-related death. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild, mainly grade III nausea and vomiting in 20% of the patients. After a median follow-up period of 54 months, the median progression-free survival was 14.3 weeks and the median overall survival was 31.3 weeks. This three-drug chemotherapy combination is feasible, well tolerated, and shows activity in metastatic NSCLC.

Assessment of quality of life and symptom improvement in lung cancer clinical trials

The majority of lung cancers are diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment options are limited and mainly palliative. In advanced lung cancer, quality-of-life (QOL) issues have become an integral part of making decisions about various treatment options. Recent clinical trials in patients with lung cancer have assessed symptom improvement and QOL as important endpoints. There are several valid and reliable QOL assessment instruments that specifically evaluate symptoms of lung cancer. These questionnaires evaluate a variety of factors related to emotional, physical, and social well-being. Several key factors, including age, gender, comorbidities, and quality of supportive care may affect symptoms and QOL in patients with lung cancer. Overall, QOL is important for patients with advanced lung cancer; therefore, symptom and QOL assessments are becoming vital in evaluating the efficacy of emerging cancer treatments.

A randomised phase II study of weekly paclitaxel or vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated

Phase II studies have suggested that weekly paclitaxel has a higher response rate and better toxicity profile than the conventional schedule of once every 3 or 4 weeks. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel plus cisplatin (PC) vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VC) in chemonaïve non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. From October 2000 to May 2002, 140 patients were enrolled. The treatment dose was P 66 mg m(-2) intravenous infusion (i.v.) on days 1, 8, and 15, and C 60 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 15, or V 23 mg m(-2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15, and C 60 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 15, every 4 weeks. In all, 281 cycles of PC and 307 cycles of VC were given to the patients in the PC and VC arms, respectively. There were 26 partial responses and one complete response (overall 38.6%) in the PC arm, and no complete responses, but 27 partial responses (overall 38.6%) in the VC arm. Myelosuppression was more common in the VC arm (P<0.001). Peripheral neuropathy and myalgia were significantly more common in the PC arm (P<0.001). The median time to disease progression was 6 months in the PC arm and 8.4 months in the VC arm (P=0.0344). The median survival time was 11.7 months in the PC arm and 15.4 months in the VC arm (P=0.297). We concluded that weekly PC is not suggested for NSCLC patients due to the relatively shorter progression-free survival and more common nonhaematological toxicities. British Journal of Cancer (2004) 90, 359-365. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601526 www.bjcancer.com

Phase I study with dose escalation of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with ifosfamide (GIP) in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (P) are active reference agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ifosfamide (I) has also been approved for NSCLC treatment. This phase I trial aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose [maximum tolerated dosage (MTD)], and recommended dose (RD) of a GIP combination in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. In this study, one cycle of chemotherapy combined the following: ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 fixed dose (24-hour intravenous infusion) combined with mesna, day 1; gemcitabine: starting dose 1,000 mg/m2/d, escalating by 250 mg/m2 increments, days 1 and 15; cisplatin: starting dose 80 mg/m2, subsequently 100 mg/m2, day 15; in cohorts of at least 3 patients. Cycles were repeated every 28 days and no hematopoietic growth factors were administered. DLT was evaluated after the first chemotherapy cycle. Thirty-three patients (30 men, 3 women) with stage III (14 patients)/IV (19 patients) NSCLC were treated at eight dose levels, receiving 109 cycles of chemotherapy. Neutropenia was the only DLT reported. Although the MTD was not reached at the highest tested dose level, the RD chosen corresponds to the full doses of the GP3000 doublet standard (G: 3,000 mg/m2; P: 100 mg/m2 per cycle) every 28 days. Nonhematologic toxicities were mainly grade I-II. Relative dose intensities of G, I, and P at the RD were 96%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. Sixteen of 33 patients with measurable/evaluable disease had an objective response including two complete responses. In conclusion, GIP chemotherapy is safe and appears to be active in patients with NSCLC. The RD is gemcitabine: 1,500 mg/m2 days 1 and 15; ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 day 1; cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 day 15. A confirmatory phase II study is currently under way, before a phase III trial of GIP versus GP.

Quality-of-life trials in lung cancer: past achievements and future challenges

Much work has been done regarding QOL in lung cancer trials. There are now several validated QOL instruments, particularly for patients with lung cancer. Past accomplishments include key trials demonstrating a benefit of chemotherapy or radiation in patients with advanced NSCLC not only regarding traditional endpoints but also by improving palliation and aspects of QOL such as pain and dyspnea. More recently, studies have emerged that incorporate QOL in patients with locally advanced disease. Key challenges relate to the optimal design and successful completion of these QOL studies. Missing data remains a key problem in many QOL studies, particularly in lung cancer trials. Future studies should focus on incorporating QOL into phase III studies with clear hypotheses that can ultimately lead to clinically meaningful interventions.

Emerging drugs for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world. Therapeutic improvements caused by recent cytotoxic agents seem to have reached a plateau. New therapeutic strategies are, therefore, necessary to improve the cure rate. These include receptor-targeted therapy, signal transduction or cell-cycle inhibition, angiogenesis inhibitors, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, gene therapy and vaccines. The antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) group includes compounds acting on the extracellular domain of EGFR, such as IMC-C225 and trastuzumab; small molecules inhibiting EGFR phosphorylation, such as ZD 1839 and OSI-774; or compounds that interfere with one of the downstream steps, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors, such as SCH66336, and protein kinase C inhibitors, such as ISIS 3521, have also shown antitumour activity. Antiangiogenesis inhibitors include matrix metalloprotease inhibitors (MMPIs), suchs as marimastat, AG3340, BAY 12-9566, BMS-275291 and Col-3. Antiangiogenic agents offer great potential for the treatment of lung cancer, as shown in preclinical models, whereas emerging data suggest that there are limits to their use as monotherapy in advanced disease. Molecules targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptor (VEGFR) also seem to control tumour progression and may prolong survival. COX-2 inhibitors are another class of agents currently under evaluation in clinical trials for their chemoprevention role in subjects at high lung cancer risk, and also in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with standard chemotherapeutics. Genetic and immunologic therapies represent two additional promising modalities. All of these therapies are in different phases of clinical testing and have shown encouraging activity alone or in combination with chemotherapy drugs.

Retrospective cost analysis of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer compared to other combination therapies in Europe

In two recent randomised trials, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (Gem/Cis) was found to be at least as effective as vinorelbine plus cisplatin (Vin/Cis), paclitaxel plus cisplatin (Pac/Cis), paclitaxel plus carboplatin (Pac/Carbo), or docetaxel plus cisplatin (Doc/Cis) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In cost-minimisation analyses of these studies from the perspectives of the national health services of five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK), Gem/Cis was associated with lower average treatment-related costs than Vin/Cis, Pac/Cis, and Pac/Carbo, and similar or lower costs than Doc/Cis. The incremental cost savings per patient of Gem/Cis compared to Vin/Cis ranged from 827 Euro to 2055 Euro per patient and from 1616 Euro to 5342 Euro compared to the paclitaxel-containing regimens. Overall, results were generally similar between countries, and were robust to univariate sensitivity analyses. Although differences in healthcare systems mean that the results may not be generalisable to all countries/settings, these results provide an economic rationale for the use of Gem/Cis as a first-line treatment option in Europe for patients with NSCLC.

Chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a look behind and ahead

Lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Western countries. The 5-year survival rate in 2002 remains dismal. In advanced disease, chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment, but a crucial step is whether the impact of chemotherapy in the management of this disease justifies either the toxicity on patients or the always-rising costs. A number of randomized trials demonstrated a prolonged survival for patients treated with chemotherapy compared with best supportive care. However, newer platinum-based combination regimens have failed to take a major step forward; chemotherapy alone has reached a plateau of activity that could be partially solved by integrating molecular-targeted strategies in clinical practice. Quality of life remains a key issue in clinical decisions for metastatic patients. New answers will come by encouraging all fit patients to join clinical trials.

Three-arm randomized study of two cisplatin-based regimens and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group--EORTC 08975

PURPOSE

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel plus cisplatin (arm A) versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B) and arm A versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (arm C) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion, day 1) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) both combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion, day 1) combined with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8). Primary end point was comparison of overall survival for B versus A and C versus A. Secondary end points included response rate and duration, progression-free survival, toxicities, quality of life [QoL], and cost of treatment.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty patients (arm A, 159; arm B, 160; arm C, 161 patients) were enrolled; all baseline characteristics were balanced. Median survival times were as follows: arm A, 8.1 months; arm B, 8.9 months; arm C, 6.7 months. Response rates were 31.8% for arm A, 36.6% for arm B, and 27.7% for arm C. Other than myelosuppression (B v A, P <.005), no statistically or clinically significant differences were observed for secondary end points. The average treatment costs were 25% higher in arm C as compared with arms A and B.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine do not increase overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC as compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin. Treatment was well tolerated, and most QoL parameters were similar, but costs associated with the nonplatinum arm were highest.

Chemotherapy options for the elderly patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Combination chemotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival compared with best supportive care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival advantage is modest and was initially demonstrated with cisplatin-containing regimens in a large meta-analysis of randomized trials reported in 1995. Newer chemotherapy combinations have been shown to be better tolerated than older cisplatin-based combinations, and some trials have also shown greater efficacy and survival benefits with these newer combinations. Combination chemotherapy is, therefore, the currently accepted standard of care for patients with good performance statuses aged less than 70 years with advanced NSCLC. However, there are limited data from clinical trials to support the use of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients over 70 years of age with advanced NSCLC. Subgroup analyses of large randomized phase III trials suggest that elderly patients with good performance statuses do as well as younger patients treated with combination chemotherapy. There are few randomized trials reported that evaluate chemotherapy in patients aged greater than 70 years only. Based on data from trials performed by an Italian group, single-agent vinorelbine has been shown to have significant activity in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and to be well tolerated by those patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses of two or less, with associated improvements in measures of global health.

Chemotherapy in metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer have locally advanced and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Combination platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with advanced disease who have a performance status of 0-1. Chemotherapy is superior to supportive care alone in terms of survival, palliation of symptoms, and in many studies, improving quality of life. Newer third generation therapies such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine have been proven effective as single agents with minimal toxicity, compared with supportive care alone. In combination with platinum, these agents produce higher response rates than older platinum-based regimens, are associated with additional survival benefits, and are generally more convenient and less toxic for patients. Newer nonplatinum doublets appear equivalent to newer platinum-regimens and have expanded the options available for patients. Targeted agents are promising and may soon offer patients more effective and less toxic therapies. Progress in treatment in the advanced setting has led to advances in the care of locally advanced disease. Combination chemoradiotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced disease, and studies with newer agents are in progress.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus a cisplatin-based triplet versus nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare the survival benefit obtained with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, a cisplatin-based triplet, and nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CG); cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CGV); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus ifosfamide 3 g/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks for three cycles (GV-VI).

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-seven patients were assigned to treatment (182 CG, 188 CGV, 187 GV-VI). Response rates were significantly inferior for the nonplatinum sequential doublet (CG, 42%; CGV, 41%; GV-VI, 27%; CG v GV-VI, P =.003). No differences in median survival or time to progression were observed. Toxicity was higher for the triplet: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (GC, 32%; CGV, 57%; GV-VI, 27%; P <.05); neutropenic fever (CG, 4%; CGV, 19%; GV-VI, 5%; P <.0001); grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (CG, 19%; CGV, 23%; GV-VI, 3%; P =.0001); and grade 3 to 4 emesis (GC, 22%; GCV, 32%; GV-VI, 6%; P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of these results, CG remains a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both developed and developing countries, heavily impacts patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although recent research has found many positive and significant steps in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which HRQOL has been used as an outcome, questions remain regarding methodologic quality and impact value of HRQOL outcome assessments in some RCTs. To date, no detailed systematic review exists of HRQOL methodology in NSCLC RCTs.

METHODS

A systematic review using Cochrane methodology evaluated HRQOL components in RCTs. Identified studies were evaluated independently by three reviewers on a broad set of predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine published RCTs (NSCLC patient samples total, N = 8445) with an HRQOL component were identified. Although most trials exhibited good-quality research and useful HRQOL and clinical data, the weaknesses identified in some trials include such common limitations as no clear hypothesis, lack of a clear approach to missing data and data analysis, and limited presentation of results.

CONCLUSION

Although it is clear that HRQOL is an important end point in NSCLC RCTs because the information helps to influence treatment recommendations, the identified weaknesses in conducting HRQOL measurement in NSCLC RCTs and the reporting of results need to be addressed.

Carboplatin and paclitaxol (Taxol) as an induction regimen for patients with biopsy-proven stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer. an EORTC phase II study (EORTC 08958)

The aim of this study was to document the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel (Taxol)/carboplatin when used as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prior to definitive local treatment within a large, ongoing comparative study (EORTC 08941). 52 eligible, consenting, chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC, median age of 60 years, stage IIIA N2 disease and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion followed by carboplatin at an area under the concentration curve (AUC) of 6 every 3 weeks for three courses. Most patients received three courses. No grade 3/4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia was documented. Over all of the cycles, 6% (3 patients) experienced grade 3 leucopenia while 63% (32/51 patients) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia. There was 1 patient (2%) with febrile neutropenia, no early or toxic deaths and no hypersensitivity reactions. Severe non-haematological toxicity was uncommon, with the exception of grade 3 alopecia in 39%, lethargy in 8% and myalgia in 6%. Of the eligible patients (n=52), there was one complete response (CR) and 32 partial responses (PR), resulting in a response rate of 64% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 49%-76%). Of the 15 eligible patients randomised to surgery after induction chemotherapy, 3 patients did not receive surgery and 2 patients (n=12) had no tumour in the mediastinal nodes (17%). Resections were considered complete in 2 of the 12. Median survival for all eligible patients (n=52) was 20.5 months (95% CI 16.1-31.2), with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 68.5% (95% CI 55.2-81.7). In patients with N2 stage IIIA NSCLC, paclitaxel/carboplatin is an active and very well-tolerated induction regimen.

Quality of Life and the Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with the majority of patients presenting with advanced disease. Despite the introduction of newer therapeutic agents and modest survival improvement, the overall prognosis for these patients is poor. The goals of therapy should therefore include improvement in quality of life (QOL), palliation of symptoms, and prolongation of survival. Quality of life has now become recognized as an important outcome measure for cancer therapy. Quality-of-life endpoints are being increasingly incorporated into clinical trials of newer agents to further define meaningful response. The assessment of QOL involves comprehensive measurement tools that address the physical, social, functional, and emotional well-being of the patient. Such measurements should be easy to use, meaningful, and relevant to the patients and clinician. Although these measures assess the longitudinal impact of treatment on QOL, pretreatment QOL scores may also be an important prognostic factor for survival in patients with lung carcinoma. This article reviews QOL measures and the data for QOL benefits from therapy in patients with advanced small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer.

Influence of cisplatin-use, age, performance status and duration of chemotherapy on symptom control in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: detailed symptom analysis of a randomised study comparing cisplatin-vindesine to gemcitabine

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that treatment of patients with symptomatic advanced non-small cell lung cancer with single agent Gemcitabine (GEM) resulted in a superior clinical-benefit response rate (RR) compared to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. We now report the detailed individual symptom control analysis, and the influence of cisplatin-use, age, performance status (PS) and duration of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received either GEM (1000 mg/m(2), days 1, 8 and 15) or cisplatin (100 mg/m(2), day 1) plus Vindesine (3 mg/m(2), days 1 and 15) (PV), both every 4 weeks. Scores of 9 symptoms were listed weekly by the patient on visual analogue scales. Improvement of a symptom was defined as 2 consecutive cycles of improvement over baseline.

RESULTS

Baseline symptoms in the 169 patients were well balanced between the 2 arms (84 GEM, 85 PV). Both patients with objective response and disease stabilisation had clearly better symptom control than those with disease progression. Symptom control in both arms was similar for 'disease-specific' symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, pain or haemoptysis. Compared to PV, a significantly larger number of GEM-patients had better scores for 'constitutional' items such as anorexia (P=0.007), ability to carry on with daily activities (P=0.04) and overall impression of quality-of-life (P=0.008). Symptom control was very similar in younger (<65 years) versus older (>/=65 years) patients, and only slightly better in those with a Karnofsky PS >/=80% compared to those <80%. Most of the symptom improvement occurred in the first 3 cycles, with some further symptom improvement in the following cycles in the GEM-arm only.

CONCLUSIONS

Both GEM and PV yield a symptom control rate much higher than expected by the objective tumour RR. GEM is equally effective in controlling 'disease-specific' symptoms, but superior in controlling 'constitutional' symptoms. Most of the symptom control was achieved during the first 3 cycles of treatment, with some further improvement thereafter in the GEM-arm only.

Taxanes in the treatment of advanced (stage III and IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): recent developments

Taxanes, paclitaxel, and docetaxel have become the cornerstone of both first-line and second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several pivotal phase III randomized trials have been published. These studies and phase II trials will be discussed. Additionally, studies utilizing a taxane and radiation therapy for resectable and locally advanced NSCLC will be outlined. The article will end with a discussion on newer strategies being currently explored to improve survival in advanced NSCLC.

Lung cancer. 4: chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: the end of the beginning

The development of chemotherapy for NSCLC over the last 20 years is reviewed, particularly with regard to its palliative effects. New "fourth generation" agents designed to inhibit specific biological pathways thought to be crucial to tumour growth give cause for optimism in the future treatment of NSCLC.

Docetaxel and carboplatin is an active regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in Caucasian and Asian patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report response rates, survival and toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following docetaxel and carboplatin, and to explore potential differences in these end points between Caucasian and Asian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight patients of good performance status with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were entered on a phase II study at three sites in Australia and Singapore. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 were given every 3 weeks. Response to treatment and toxicity were graded by standard criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and subgroups compared by the log-rank test. Cox's proportional hazards regression was used to determine which potentially explanatory variables independently affected the outcome.

RESULTS

The response rate was 39% (95% confidence interval 27% to 52%), and 42% in evaluable patients. Response occurred in 65% of Asian and 31% of Caucasian patients (P = 0.01). Ethnicity was the only significant predictor of response in multivariate analysis. The 1-year survival rate was 53%. Performance status (P = 0.021), ethnicity (P = 0.035) and presence of bone or liver metastases (P = 0.011) were independent predictors of overall survival. Neutropenia (grade IV in 73% of patients), febrile neutropenia (26% patients) and diarrhea (grade III/IV in 11% of patients) were the major treatment related toxicities. A high rate (three of six) of febrile neutropenia in Singapore, including one treatment-related death in the initial patients treated, resulted in a reduction in the carboplatin dose to AUC 4.5 at that site.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen is active in advanced NSCLC. The potential impact of ethnicity on efficacy and toxicity of treatment requires further investigation.

ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium) as second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium, LY231514), a multi-targeted antifolate with first-line activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in a second-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with NSCLC were eligible for this phase II study if they had progressive disease within 3 months after first-line chemotherapy or progression while being treated with first-line chemotherapy. In 81 patients studied, two cohorts of patients were assigned based on whether the first-line therapy had included a platinum regimen. ALIMTA was administered at 500 mg/m2 by 10-min intravenous infusion once every 21 days.

RESULTS

The response rate in the 79 evaluable patients with poor prognostic features was 8.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 15.1%]. The response rate in the platinum-pretreated group was 4.5% and 14.1% in the non-platinum-pretreated group. The median duration of response was 6.8 months (95% CI 3.4-7.8 months, 0% censoring). The median survival time was 5.7 months (95% CI 4.0-8.3 months, 7.6% censoring). The probability of survival for at least 6 months was estimated to be 48%. The median time to disease progression was 2 months (95% CI 1.4-2.8 months, 0% censoring). The principal toxicity was myelosuppression, which was reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

ALIMTA is active in a second-line setting in non-platinum-pretreated NSCLC patients progressing within 3 months of first-line chemotherapy. This study demonstrates that it is possible to evaluate new drugs against NSCLC in a second-line setting.

How quality of life data contribute to our understanding of cancer patients' experiences? A study of patients with lung cancer

A prospective study was conducted to measure quality of life in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients attending a chest clinic in a large teaching and district general hospital in a geographically defined area (northern sector of Glasgow, Scotland). Quality of life was assessed at two points in time, pre-diagnosis (baseline) and 3 months after diagnosis (follow-up) using three standard measures; the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP); the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and its lung cancer supplement (QLQ-LC13). Out of 133 lung cancer patients diagnosed during the study period, 129 patients (97%) were interviewed pre-diagnosis. Of these, only 63% of the patients had an active treatment. Ninety-six patients were alive at follow-up, of whom 82 patients were re-interviewed. Thus, only 82 patients who had complete data were used in the analysis. Comparing patients' pre-diagnosis and follow-up scores on the NHP, only sleep difficulties improved slightly. Patients reported increased perceived health problems of all other characteristics studied (energy, p = 0.0004; physical mobility, p = 0.0008). Similar results were observed on the EORTC questionnaires indicating that patients' functioning and global quality of life had decreased. The only significant improvement after 3 months was seen in patients' cough (p = 0.006). There were marked increases in hair loss (p < 0.0001), constipation (p = 0.007), and sore mouth (p = 0.0004). The findings suggest that patient-centred variables should receive sufficient consideration in the treatment of lung cancer. The study results clearly indicate that information on quality of life contributes to our understanding of patients' experiences of their cancer treatment.