51
|
Huemer F, Hecht S, Scharinger B, Schlintl V, Rinnerthaler G, Schlick K, Heregger R, Melchardt T, Wimmer A, Mühlbacher I, Koch OO, Neureiter D, Klieser E, Seyedinia S, Beheshti M, Greil R, Weiss L. Body composition dynamics and impact on clinical outcome in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy with the FLOT protocol. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04096-w. [PMID: 35864270 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04096-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT constitutes a standard of care approach for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We aimed at investigating anthropometric, CT-based and FDG-PET-based body composition parameters and dynamics during this multidisciplinary approach and the impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS This retrospective, single-center study was based on medical records and (FDG-PET)-CT images among gastric/GEJ cancer patients undergoing perioperative FLOT chemotherapy. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2021, 46 gastric/GEJ cancer patients started perioperative FLOT at our tertiary cancer center (Salzburg, Austria). At a median follow-up of 32 months median PFS was 47.4 months and median OS was not reached. The skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) turned out to be the only body composition parameter with a statistically significant decrease during pre-operative FLOT (51.3 versus 48.8 cm2/m2, p = 0.02). Neither pre-FLOT body mass index (BMI), nor SMI had an impact on the duration of pre-operative FLOT, the time interval from pre-operative FLOT initiation to surgery, the necessity of pre-operative or post-operative FLOT de-escalation or the likelihood of the start of postoperative chemotherapy. Pre-FLOT BMI (overweight versus normal, HR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02-0.65, p = 0.02) and pre-FLOT SMI (sarcopenia versus no sarcopenia, HR: 5.08, 95% CI: 1.27-20.31, p = 0.02) were statistically significantly associated with PFS in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION The statistically significant SMI loss during pre-operative FLOT and the meaningful impact of baseline SMI and BMI on PFS argue for the implementation of a nutritional screening and support program prior to the initiation of pre-operative FLOT in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Huemer
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stefan Hecht
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Bernhard Scharinger
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Verena Schlintl
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Konstantin Schlick
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ronald Heregger
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas Melchardt
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Angela Wimmer
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Iris Mühlbacher
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Oliver Owen Koch
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sara Seyedinia
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Bridges S, Thomas B, Radhakrishna G, Hawkins M, Holborow A, Hurt C, Mukherjee S, Nixon L, Crosby T, Gwynne S. SCOPE 2 - Still Answering the Unanswered Questions in Oesophageal Radiotherapy? SCOPE 2: a Randomised Phase II/III Trial to Study Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Patients with Oesophageal Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation with an Embedded Phase II Trial for Patients with a Poor Early Response using Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e269-e280. [PMID: 35466013 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The SCOPE 2 trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer investigates the benefits of radiotherapy dose escalation and systemic therapy optimisation. The trial opened in 2016. The landscape of oesophageal cancer treatment over the lifetime of this trial has changed significantly and the protocol has evolved to reflect this. However, with the recent results of the Dutch phase III ART DECO study showing no improvement in local control or overall survival with radiotherapy dose escalation in a similar patient group, we sought to determine if the SCOPE 2 trial is still answering the key unanswered questions for oesophageal radiotherapy. Here we discuss the rationale behind the SCOPE 2 trial, outline the trial schema and review current data on dose escalation and outline recommendations for future areas of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bridges
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - B Thomas
- Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | - M Hawkins
- University College London, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, UK
| | - A Holborow
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | - C Hurt
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Mukherjee
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - L Nixon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - T Crosby
- Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Gwynne
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Sihag S, Nussenzweig SC, Walch HS, Hsu M, Tan KS, De La Torre S, Janjigian YY, Maron SB, Ku GY, Tang LH, Shah PM, Wu A, Jones DR, Solit DB, Schultz N, Ganesh K, Berger MF, Molena D. The Role of the TP53 Pathway in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:2669-2678. [PMID: 35377946 PMCID: PMC9197876 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma, response to neoadjuvant therapy strongly predicts survival, but robust molecular predictors of response have been lacking. We therefore sought to discover meaningful predictors of response in these patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We retrospectively identified all patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who (i) were treated with multimodality therapy with curative intent at our institution from 2014 through 2020 and (ii) underwent prospective sequencing by Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Clinicopathologic and genomic data were analyzed to identify potential genomic features, somatic alterations, and oncogenic pathways associated with treatment response. RESULTS In total, 237 patients were included. MDM2 amplification was independently associated with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy [OR, 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.55); P = 0.032], when accounting for significant clinicopathologic variables, including clinical stage, tumor grade, and chemotherapy regimen. Moreover, TP53 pathway alterations, grouped according to inferred severity of TP53 dysfunction, were significantly associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.004, q = 0.07). Patients with MDM2 amplifications or truncating biallelic TP53 mutations had similar outcomes in terms of poor responses to neoadjuvant therapy and, consequently, shorter progression-free survival, compared with patients with TP53 pathway wild-type tumors. Thus, worsening TP53 dysfunction was directly correlated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS MDM2 amplification and TP53 status are associated with response to therapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dearth of actionable targets in esophageal adenocarcinoma, MDM2 inhibition, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, may represent an important therapeutic strategy to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065,Co-Corresponding Authors: Daniela Molena, M.D. 1275 York Avenue, Office C878, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3970, , Smita Sihag, M.D., M.P.H. 1275 York Avenue, Office C881, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3309,
| | - Samuel C. Nussenzweig
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Henry S. Walch
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Sergio De La Torre
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Steven B. Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Pari M. Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Abraham Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - David B. Solit
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Karuna Ganesh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065,Co-Corresponding Authors: Daniela Molena, M.D. 1275 York Avenue, Office C878, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3970, , Smita Sihag, M.D., M.P.H. 1275 York Avenue, Office C881, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3309,
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Buckstein MH, Anker CJ, Chuong MD, Hawkins MA, Kharofa J, Olsen JR. CROSSing into New Therapies for Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:5-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
55
|
Harrington CA, Carr RA, Hsu M, Tan KS, Sihag S, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Molena D. Patterns and Impact of Nodal Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and R0 Resection in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:411-419. [PMID: 35346491 PMCID: PMC9288545 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about the pattern of nodal metastases in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and undergone surgery. We sought to assess this pattern and evaluate its association with prognosis. METHODS All patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and R0 esophagectomy between 2010 and 2018 at our institution were included (n = 537). The primary objective was to evaluate the association of sites of lymph node metastases with disease-free survival. The number of nodal stations and individual sites of nodal metastases were evaluated first in univariable then in separate multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for clinical factors. RESULTS Of 537 patients, 193 (36%) had pathologic nodal metastases at the time of surgery; 153 (28%) had single-station disease, 32 (6.0%) had 2-station disease, and 8 (1.5%) had 3-station disease. The majority of patients with multiple positive nodal stations had positive nodes in the paraesophageal (93%) and/or left gastric stations (60%). Multivariable models controlling for clinical factors showed that an increasing number of positive nodal stations (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.35-1.84; P < .01)-in particular, the subcarinal (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.54-5.03; P < .01) and paraesophageal stations (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.58-2.54; P < .01)-was associated with increased risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS One-third of patients who have undergone R0 resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma following induction chemoradiation therapy have metastatic lymph nodes. An increasing number of nodal stations, particularly paraesophageal and subcarinal metastases, were associated with increased risk of recurrence.
Collapse
|
56
|
Cowzer D, Janjigian YY. Top advances in esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancers in 2021. Cancer 2022; 128:1894-1899. [PMID: 35179774 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cowzer
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Obermannova R, Selingerova I, Rehak Z, Jedlicka V, Slavik M, Fabian P, Novotny I, Zemanova M, Studentova H, Grell P, Zdrazilova Dubska L, Demlova R, Harustiak T, Hejnova R, Kiss I, Vyzula R. PET/CT-tailored treatment of locally advanced oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: a report on the feasibility of the multicenter GastroPET study. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 13:17588359211065153. [PMID: 35035533 PMCID: PMC8753528 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211065153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy is a recommended treatment approach for localised oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma, but not all patients respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Early identification of non-responders and treatment adaptation in the preoperative period could improve outcomes. GastroPET is a national, multicentre phase II trial evaluating a 18FDG-PET/CT-guided preoperative treatment strategy with the R0 resection rate as a primary endpoint. Here, we report on the accuracy of the methodology, the feasibility of the study design and patient safety data after enrolment of the first 63 patients. METHODS Patients with locally advanced oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma (Siewert I - III) stage Ib-IIIc underwent baseline 18FDG-PET/CT scanning and re-evaluation after 14 days of oxaliplatinum-5FU-(docetaxel) chemotherapy. Responders were defined by a ⩾ 35% decrease in tumour FDG standardised uptake value (SUV)average from baseline. Responders continued with the same chemotherapy for 2 to 3 months prior to surgery. PET-non-responders switched to preoperative chemoradiotherapy [weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions)]. Here, we aim to confirm the feasibility of FDG-PET-based response assessment in a multicenter setting and to compare local versus central reading. In addition, we report on the feasibility of the study conduct and patient safety data. RESULTS A total of 64 patients received baseline and sequential 14-day 18FDG-PET/CT scanning. And, 63 were allocated to the respective treatment arm according to PET-response [35 (56%) responders and 28 (44%) non-responders]. The concordance of local versus central reading of SUV changes was 100%. Until the date of this analysis, 47 patients (28 responders and 19 non-responders) completed surgery. Postoperative complications of grade ⩾ 3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE Version 5.0) were reported in five responders (18%; 95% CI: 7.9-36%) and two non-responders (11%; 95% CI: 2.9-31%), with no statistical difference (p = 0.685). One patient in each arm died after surgery, leading to a postoperative in-hospital mortality rate of 4.3% (2/47 patients; 95% CI: 1.2-14%). CONCLUSION Local and central FDG-SUV quantification and PET-response assessment showed high concordance. This confirms the accuracy of a PET-response-guided treatment algorithm for locally advanced oesophago-gastric junction cancer in a multicenter setting. Preoperative treatment adaptation revealed feasible and safe for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radka Obermannova
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech
Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Iveta Selingerova
- Research Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology,
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of
Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Rehak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Masaryk
Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vaclav Jedlicka
- Department of Surgery, Masaryk Memorial Cancer
Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine,
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Slavik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk
Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Fabian
- Department of Pathology, Masaryk Memorial
Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ivo Novotny
- Department of Gastroenterology, Masaryk
Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milada Zemanova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of
Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague,
Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Studentova
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital
Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Peter Grell
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Zdrazilova Dubska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine – Clinical
Microbiology and Immunology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech
Republic
| | - Regina Demlova
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of
Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Harustiak
- Third Department of Surgery, First Faculty of
Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Renata Hejnova
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno,
Czech Republic
| | - Igor Kiss
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Rostislav Vyzula
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care,
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Hall WA, Paulson E, Li XA, Erickson B, Schultz C, Tree A, Awan M, Low DA, McDonald BA, Salzillo T, Glide-Hurst CK, Kishan AU, Fuller CD. Magnetic resonance linear accelerator technology and adaptive radiation therapy: An overview for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:34-56. [PMID: 34792808 PMCID: PMC8985054 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) continues to play an important role in the treatment of cancer. Adaptive RT (ART) is a novel method through which RT treatments are evolving. With the ART approach, computed tomography or magnetic resonance (MR) images are obtained as part of the treatment delivery process. This enables the adaptation of the irradiated volume to account for changes in organ and/or tumor position, movement, size, or shape that may occur over the course of treatment. The advantages and challenges of ART maybe somewhat abstract to oncologists and clinicians outside of the specialty of radiation oncology. ART is positioned to affect many different types of cancer. There is a wide spectrum of hypothesized benefits, from small toxicity improvements to meaningful gains in overall survival. The use and application of this novel technology should be understood by the oncologic community at large, such that it can be appropriately contextualized within the landscape of cancer therapies. Likewise, the need to test these advances is pressing. MR-guided ART (MRgART) is an emerging, extended modality of ART that expands upon and further advances the capabilities of ART. MRgART presents unique opportunities to iteratively improve adaptive image guidance. However, although the MRgART adaptive process advances ART to previously unattained levels, it can be more expensive, time-consuming, and complex. In this review, the authors present an overview for clinicians describing the process of ART and specifically MRgART.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- History, 20th Century
- History, 21st Century
- Humans
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/history
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/instrumentation
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/methods
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/trends
- Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Particle Accelerators
- Radiation Oncology/history
- Radiation Oncology/instrumentation
- Radiation Oncology/methods
- Radiation Oncology/trends
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/history
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/trends
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A. Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eric Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - X. Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Christopher Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Alison Tree
- The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Daniel A. Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brigid A. McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Travis Salzillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carri K. Glide-Hurst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Zhao Z, Yang S, Zhou A, Li X, Fang R, Zhang S, Zhao G, Li P. Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Development, Diagnosis, and Possible Therapeutic Application of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:732702. [PMID: 34527593 PMCID: PMC8435888 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.732702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) persists among the most lethal and broad-spreading malignancies in China. The exosome is a kind of extracellular vesicle (EV) from about 30 to 200 nm in diameter, contributing to the transfer of specific functional molecules, such as metabolites, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. The paramount role of exosomes in the formation and development of ESCC, which relies on promoting intercellular communication in the tumor microenvironment (TME), is manifested with immense amounts. Tumor-derived exosomes (TDEs) participate in most hallmarks of ESCC, including tumorigenesis, invasion, angiogenesis, immunologic escape, metastasis, radioresistance, and chemoresistance. Published reports have delineated that exosome-encapsulated cargos like miRNAs may have utility in the diagnosis, as prognostic biomarkers, and in the treatment of ESCC. This review summarizes the function of exosomes in the neoplasia, progression, and metastasis of ESCC, which improves our understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of ESCC, and presents a promising target for early diagnostics in ESCC. However, recent studies of exosomes in the treatment of ESCC are sparse. Thus, we introduce the advances in exosome-based methods and indicate the possible applications for ESCC therapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuyue Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Anni Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shutian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guiping Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|