Compliance With Consensus Recommendations for Systemic Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival of Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?

BACKGROUND

Despite multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs), non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines is still observed for breast cancer patients. Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may improve the implementation of guidelines, but cases of non-compliance persist.

METHODS

OncoDoc2, a guideline-based decision support system, has been routinely used to remind MTB physicians of patient-specific recommended care plans. Non-compliant MTB decisions were analysed using a multivariate adjusted logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2009, 1624 decisions for invasive breast cancers with a global non-compliance rate of 8.3% were analysed. Patient factors associated with non-compliance were age>80 years (odds ratio (OR): 7.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-15.7) in pre-surgical decisions; microinvasive tumour (OR: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.5-17.5), surgical discovery of microinvasion in addition to a unique invasive tumour (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.4-12.5), and prior neoadjuvant treatment (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.1-15.1) in decisions with recommendation of re-excision; age<35 years (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.9-11.4), positive hormonal receptors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (OR: 15.7; 95% CI: 3.1-78.7), and the absence of prior axillary surgery (OR: 17.2; 95% CI: 5.1-58.1) in adjuvant decisions.

CONCLUSION

Residual non-compliance despite the use of OncoDoc2 illustrates the need to question the clinical profiles where evidence is missing. These findings challenge the weaknesses of guideline content rather than the use of CDSSs.

Territorial inequalities in management and conformity to clinical guidelines for sarcoma patients: an exhaustive population-based cohort analysis in the Rhône-Alpes region

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas are rare cancers with great variability in clinical and histopathological presentation. The main objective of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is to standardize diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

From March 2005 to February 2007, all patients diagnosed with localized sarcoma in the Rhône-Alpes region were included in a cohort-based study, to evaluate the compliance of sarcoma management with French guidelines in routine practice and to identify predictive factors for compliance with CGPs.

RESULTS

634 (71 %) patients with localized sarcoma satisfying the inclusion criteria were included out of 891 newly diagnosed sarcomas. Taking into account initial diagnosis until follow-up, overall conformity to CPGs was only 40 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) = 36-44], ranging from 54 % for gastrointestinal stromal tumor to 36 % for soft tissue sarcoma and 42 % for bone sarcoma. In multivariate analysis, primary tumor type [relative risk (RR) = 4.42, 95 % CI = 2.79-6.99, p < 0.001], dedicated multidisciplinary staff before surgery (RR = 4.19, 95 % CI = 2.39-7.35, p < 0.001) and management in specialized hospitals (RR = 3.71, 95 % CI = 2.43-5.66, p < 0.001) were identified as unique independent risk factors for conformity to CPGs for overall treatment sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

With only 40 % of total conformity to CPGs, the conclusions support the improvement of initial sarcoma management and its performance in specialized centres or within specialized dedicated networks.

Poor compliance with breast cancer treatment guidelines in men undergoing breast-conserving surgery

Lumpectomy is performed in a small but growing proportion of men with breast cancer. It is unknown whether men undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) receive care compliant with breast cancer treatment guidelines. Patients with breast cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database who underwent lumpectomy between 1983 and 2009 were identified. Gender differences in the receipt of lymph node staging and adjuvant radiation therapy were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to evaluate the independent association of gender on these outcomes. The influence of gender on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was analyzed. 382,030 of 824,408 (46.3 %) women compared to 712 of 6,039 (11.8 %) men with breast cancer underwent lumpectomy. Men were older, more likely to be black, less likely to have stage I disease and more likely to have stage IV disease. Only 59.2 % of men had lymph nodes sampled at the time of surgery compared to 81.6 % of women (p < 0.0001). In addition, only 35.4 % of men received adjuvant breast radiation therapy compared to 69.8 % of women (p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, race, stage, grade, and year of diagnosis, female gender was significantly associated with receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (OR 2.9, 95 % CI 2.4-3.4) and lymph node staging (OR 1.6, 95 % CI 1.3-1.90). Five- and ten-year BCSS were 88.0 and 83.5 % for men compared to 93.2 and 88.2 % for women (p < 0.001). Men with breast cancer are less likely to receive lymph node staging or adjuvant radiation therapy following BCS compared to women.

Establishing a quality measurement system for cancer care in Japan

Ensuring the quality of care is a major objective of cancer control policy. The Cancer Control Act 2006 placed responsibility on the Japanese government to maintain the quality of cancer care nationwide. To function as centers providing high-quality care, designated cancer care hospitals (397 hospitals as of April 2012) were instituted nationwide. Although they meet the structural standards, such as the presence of radiation equipment and palliative care teams, it remains unclear whether the designation has led to appropriate provision of care and optimal patient outcomes. A national system to examine the processes and outcomes of cancer care is under development. In 2007 and 2008, the Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers publicly disclosed the 5-year survival of their member facilities with strict data quality standards, including sufficient follow-up of patients' vital status. The network of designated cancer care hospitals will follow this lead to provide a national outcome monitoring system. The processes of care have also been addressed by a government-funded research project. With the collaboration of clinical experts, 206 quality indicators have been developed for five major cancers in Japan (breast, colorectal, liver, lung and stomach) and palliative care. Each indicator described the target patients and standards of care for the patients, the provision of which was considered an aspect of quality. In 2012, the Cancer Registry Chapter of the Association of Prefectural Designated Cancer Care Hospitals instituted quality measurement using these indicators. These activities will soon lead to effective quality monitoring and improvement in Japan.

Adherence to recommended treatments for early invasive breast cancer: decisions of women attending surgeons in the breast cancer audit of Australia and New Zealand

AIM

The study aim was to determine the frequency with which women decline clinicians' treatment recommendations and variations in this frequency by age, cancer and service descriptors.

DESIGN

The study included 36,775 women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer in 1998-2005 and attending Australian and New Zealand breast surgeons. Rate ratios for declining treatment were examined by descriptor, using bilateral and multiple logistic regression analyses. Proportional hazards regression was used in exploratory analyses of associations with breast cancer death.

RESULTS

3.4% of women declined a recommended treatment of some type, ranging from 2.6% for women under 40 years to 5.8% for those aged 80 years or more, and with parallel increases by age presenting for declining radiotherapy (p<0.001) and axillary surgery (p=0.006). Multiple regression confirmed that common predictors of declining various treatments included low surgeon case load, treatment outside major city centres, and older age. Histological features suggesting a favourable prognosis were often predictive of declining various treatments, although reverse findings also applied with women with positive nodal status being more likely to decline a mastectomy and those with larger tumours more likely to decline chemotherapy. While survival analyses lacked statistical power due to small numbers, higher risks of breast cancer death were suggested, after adjusting for age and conventional clinical risk factors, (1) for women not receiving breast surgery for unstated reasons (RR=2.29; p<0.001); and (2) although not approaching statistical significance p≥ 0.200), for women declining radiotherapy (RR=1.22), a systemic therapy (RR1.11), and more specifically, chemotherapy (RR=1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Women have the right to choose their treatments but reasons for declining recommendations require further study to ensure that choices are well informed and clinical outcomes are optimized.

Implementing a breast cancer registry and treatment plan/summary program in clinical practice: a pilot program

BACKGROUND

There is a need to better measure and improve the quality of oncology care and improve communication with patients and other providers. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Registry (BCR) pilot evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of prospective data collection for quality assessment in daily clinical practice. Data were used to create and share treatment plans/summaries (TPSs) at the point of care.

METHODS

Using a web-based tool, 20 diverse practices entered clinical data on each new early-stage breast cancer patient into the BCR for 14 months (September 2009 through November 2010). The tool created individual TPSs that were shared with patients. Practices received practice-specific and aggregate BCR quality measures data, participated in a survey, and received a participation stipend.

RESULTS

Twenty practices entered 2014 patients into the BCR, collecting demographic, clinical, and treatment information. Fifty-two percent of practice participants replied to an end-of-pilot survey: 73% were satisfied with the BCR and web-based tool, 31% expressed concern regarding time and effort, and 52% reported additional practice costs during the pilot. Among those who created or shared the TPSs, 90% thought the documents improved oncologist-patient communication, and 95% favored using BCR data for practice quality improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective data collection for quality assessment is feasible and allows sharing of TPSs with patients at the point of care. Future efforts should focus on decreasing implementation burden to practices, broadening participation, examining costs, and, most importantly, assessing its effects on patient outcomes.

Participation in adjuvant clinical breast cancer trials: does study participation improve survival compared to guideline adherent adjuvant treatment? A retrospective multi-centre cohort study of 9,433 patients

Adjuvant clinical trials (CTs) usually compare a standard treatment regime versus an innovative new substance or regimen. Participation in CT however, is available for only few patients and exclusion criteria are usually very strict. Therefore we used an unselected patient cohort to investigate the following questions:

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This German retrospective multi-centre cohort study included 9433 patients with primary breast cancer recruited from 1992 to 2008.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred and fifty-five (13.3%) patients participated in adjuvant clinical trials (PA) and 8178 (86.7%) did not (NPA). RFS was higher among participants (PA) than among non-participants (NPA) [p=0.006], but differences in overall survival (OAS) were not significant [p=0.15]. When stratified for guideline adherence, the outcome was not different for guideline conform NPA [RFS: p=0.88] [OAS: p=0.37] compared to PA. Survival parameters however, were significantly poorer in non-guideline conform PA [RFS: p<0.001] [OAS: p<0.001] and non-guideline conform NPA [RFS: p<0.001] [OAS: p<0.001] as compared to guideline adherent PA.

DISCUSSION

There is a strong association between guideline adherence in adjuvant treatment in BC and survival. PA in clinical trials tended to higher survival rates, but only if guideline-adherent treatment was applied. Patients who do not have access to clinical trials may profit substantially from guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment.

[Compliance of patients concerning recommended radiotherapy in breast cancer : Association with recurrence, age, and hormonal therapy]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In this study, we investigated how often guidelines for radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer are not complied with, which patient group is mostly affected, and how this influences local recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients (n = 1,903) diagnosed between November 2003 and December 2008 with primary invasive or intraductal breast cancer in the interdisciplinary breast center of the Charité Hospital Berlin were included and followed for a median 2.18 years.

RESULTS

Patients who, in contrast to the recommendation of the interdisciplinary tumor board, did not undergo postoperative radiation experienced a fivefold higher local recurrence rate (p < 0.0005), corresponding to a 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of 74.5% in this group. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of patients following the recommendations was 93.3%. Guideline compliance was dependent on age of patients, acceptance of adjuvant hormonal treatment or chemotherapy, and increased diameter of the primary tumor. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed an association between compliance and age or hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSION

In order to avoid local recurrence patients should be motivated to comply with guideline driven therapy. Since a higher number of local recurrences is observed in health services research compared to clinical research, studies on the value of adjuvant treatment following local recurrence should be performed.

1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1)

The 1st international Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 1) took place on November 2011, in Lisbon. Consensus guidelines for the management of this disease were developed. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus guidelines.

Ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: status and determinants

Ethnic differences in breast cancer survival have been a long-standing concern. The objective of this article is to present relevant studies for all major US racial/ethnic groups including African-Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Japanese-Americans and Native Hawaiians, and to discuss underlying causes of disparity. In comparison to Caucasian women, African-American women continue to experience the poorest breast cancer-specific survival of all ethnic groups in the USA. The prognosis for Latinos, Native Hawaiians and Native Americans is intermediate, better than for African-Americans but not as good as for Caucasians, whereas Japanese-American women tend to have better outcomes. The following possible contributors to the observed differences are discussed in detail: unfavorable distribution of stage at diagnosis due to low screening rates, limited access to care and treatment, tumor type, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, obesity and physical activity.

Factors associated with adherence to chemotherapy guidelines in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines recommend chemotherapy for medically fit patients with stages II-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Adherence to chemotherapy guidelines has rarely been studied among large populations, mainly because performance status (PS), a key component in assessing chemotherapy appropriateness, is missing from claims-based datasets. Among a large cohort of patients with known PS, we describe first line chemotherapy use relative to guideline recommendations and identify patient factors associated with guideline concordant use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Insured patients, ages 50+, with stages II-IV NSCLC between 2000 and 2007 were identified via tumor registry (n=406). Chart abstracted PS, automated medical claims, Census tract information, and travel distance were linked to tumor registry data. Chemotherapy was considered appropriate for patients with PS 0-2. Multivariate logit models were fit to evaluate patient characteristics associated with chemotherapy over- and under-use per guideline recommendations. Tests of statistical significance were two sided.

RESULTS

Overall compliance with first line chemotherapy guidelines was 71%. Significant (p<0.05) predictors of chemotherapy underuse (19%) included increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09), higher income (OR, 1.02), diagnosed before 2003 (OR, 2.05), and vehicle access (OR, 6.96) in the patient's neighborhood. Significant predictors of chemotherapy overuse (10%) included decreasing age (OR, 0.92), diagnosed after 2003 (OR, 3.24), and higher income (OR, 1.05) in the patient's neighborhood. Among NSCLC patients 29% do not receive guideline recommended chemotherapy treatment missing opportunities for cure or beneficial palliation, or receiving chemotherapy with more risk of harm than benefit. Care concordant with guidelines is influenced by age, economic considerations such as income and transportation barriers.

Discordance with local guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: reasons and effect on survival

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant treatments are usually decided according to guidelines. However, many individual factors, such as performance status, patient refusal, complex interactions between factors (eg, discrepancies between grade and Ki 67), and complex clinical features (borderline age or tumor size) may introduce discrepancies. The aim of this study was to quantify discrepancies between local guidelines and patient management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2003 and 2005, 581 consecutive patients underwent surgery for invasive breast cancer. Patient, tumor characteristics, and outcome were recorded. We compared patient characteristics according to whether local guidelines had been followed.

RESULTS

In 90% of cases local guidelines were followed. Patients who inadequately did not receive chemotherapy were older (P < .0001), with positive hormonal receptor status (P = .02), and less aggressive tumors (P < .05). Main reasons for not administering chemotherapy were age, patient refusal, and micrometastatic node involvement. Patients from the other discordant group (ie, those who inadequately received chemotherapy), had larger (P = .01) and more aggressive tumors (P < .0001). In these cases, the clinical decision was mainly based on multifocal tumors and limit lower age. For disease-free survival (DFS), we found a significant difference between groups (P = .001). The best overall survival and DFS was found for patients who adequately received no adjuvant treatment. Survival among groups were similar when stratified on treatment modality.

CONCLUSION

The main reasons for discrepancy were age (advanced or lower limit), patient refusal, and multifocal tumors. In this series, deviations from recommendations had no affect on survival and raised the question of new indications for chemotherapy such as multifocal tumors.

Models of care for early-stage breast cancer in Canada

There is growing evidence that follow-up for patients with early breast cancer (ebc) can be effectively carried out by the primary health care provider if a plan is in place. Here, we present data from a recent survey conducted in Ontario indicating that a shared-care model could work if communication between all health professionals involved in the care of ebc patients were to be improved. Patients and primary care providers benefit when the specialist provides written information about what their roles are and what to expect. Primary care providers need to have easy access to the specialist to discuss areas of concern. Patients also need to share responsibility for their care, ensuring that they attend follow-up visits on a regular basis and that they discuss areas of concern with their primary health care provider. A shared-care model has the potential to provide the best care for the least cost to the health system.

Coming of age: breast cancer in seniors

In the U.S., cancer is a disease of aging. The average 65-year-old patient has an anticipated life expectancy of 20 years, and clinicians should take this into account when making breast cancer management decisions. However, older breast cancer patients can present with wide variations in health status, and treatment in older patients should therefore include a careful evaluation of comorbidities, physical function, polypharmacy, and other issues that could potentially impact a patient's ability to undergo chemotherapy without excessive risk. Evaluation tools are under development, including potential molecular markers, to identify which older patients are the best candidates for chemotherapy, as well as those more susceptible to actually developing cancer. Standard chemotherapy regimens are just as effective in older patients as they are in the younger population, and can substantially prolong life expectancy when used in the right patients. This article discusses breast cancer in seniors, including the epidemiology of breast cancer in these patients, the potential impact of comorbidities, and effective adjuvant therapy in selected older patients.

Factors affecting survival among women with breast cancer in Hawaii

BACKGROUND

Given previous reports of ethnic differences in breast cancer survival among Hawaii's population, we investigated the role of adherence to treatment standards, treatment toxicity, preexisting chronic conditions, and obesity in the survival of 382 prospectively studied breast cancer patients representing six ethnic groups.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from several hospitals in Honolulu. Information on tumor characteristics and treatment was abstracted from medical records. Based on the Physicians Data Query (PDQ®), we assessed compliance with recommended treatment guidelines. Vital status and cause of death data were obtained through linkage with the Hawaii Tumor Registry. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratios for predictors of survival.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 13.2 ± 3.7 years, 115 deaths had occurred, 43 from breast cancer and 72 from other causes. After adjustment, we observed only small differences in survival by ethnicity that were not statistically significant. In addition to advanced disease stage, obesity at diagnosis was a significant independent predictor of worse and receiving PDQ-recommended treatment of better breast cancer-specific and all-cause survival. Developing high-grade toxicity was associated with worse breast cancer survival, whereas comorbidity and older age at diagnosis were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Hormone receptor status, menopausal status, and type of health insurance were not associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that given access to healthcare, breast cancer patients experience similar survival rates. Although more information about mechanisms of action would be useful, it appears reasonable to recommend weight control to breast cancer survivors.

Pancreatic cancer: surgery is a feasible therapeutic option for elderly patients

Background

Compromised physiological reserve, comorbidities, and the natural history of pancreatic cancer may deny pancreatic resection from elderly patients. We evaluated outcomes of elderly patients amenable to pancreatic surgery.

Methods

The medical records of all patients who underwent pancreatic resection at our institution (1995-2007) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and outcomes characteristics in elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years were compared to a younger cohort (<70y).

Results

Of 460 patients who had surgery for pancreatic neoplasm, 166 (36%) aged ≥ 70y. Compared to patients < 70y (n = 294), elderly patients had more associated comorbidities; 72% vs. 43% (p = 0.01) and a higher rate of malignant pathologies; 73% vs. 59% (p = 0.002). Operative time and blood products consumption were comparable; however, elderly patients had more post-operative complications (41% vs. 29%; p = 0.01), longer hospital stay (26.2 vs. 19.7 days; p < 0.0001), and a higher incidence of peri-operative mortality (5.4% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis identified age ≥ 70y as an independent predictor of shorter disease-specific survival (DSS) among patients who had surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 224). Median DSS for patients aged ≥ 70y vs. < 70y were 15 months (SE: 1.6) vs. 20 months (SE: 3.4), respectively (p = 0.05). One, two, and 5-Y DSS rates for the cohort of elderly patients were 58%, 36% and 23%, respectively.

Conclusions

Properly selected elderly patients can undergo pancreatic resection with acceptable post-operative morbidity and mortality rates. Long term survival is achievable even in the presence of adenocarcinoma and therefore surgery should be seriously considered in these patients.

Discrepancy between preference and actual adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

PURPOSE

Pretreatment preferences for adjuvant therapy were examined and compared with actual treatment received.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Before definitive surgery, women with node-negative breast cancer were asked to indicate their preference for adjuvant therapy in response to 3 different clinical scenarios. The scenarios provided precise risk, benefit, and side effect information with low-, moderate-, or high-risk risk of death from breast cancer. Contingency table and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to examine associations. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used for group comparisons, with the Friedman rank sum test being used for correlated samples.

RESULTS

A total of 75 women enrolled between February 2002 and April 2005; 24% were aged > 65 years. After definitive surgery, 21% of women had ductal carcinoma in situ, and 89% had receptor-positive disease. There was a significant correlation between risk of recurrence and aggressiveness of treatment preferred (P < .001). After surgical staging, the high-risk group received more aggressive treatment compared with the low-risk group (P = .004). In the 51 women with invasive receptor-positive tumors, there was a significant difference (P = .002) in aggressiveness of treatment received based on risk of recurrence. Only 45% of the women received what they had preferred for the level of their risk before surgery. Women were more likely to receive a less aggressive therapy than they preferred initially (P = .0002).

CONCLUSION

This study is among the first to correlate pretreatment preference for therapy with the actual therapy received. Less than half of women received their indicated preference before definitive surgery, with most women receiving less aggressive therapy. Future studies will need to examine this discrepancy.

Recent advances: adjuvant therapy for older women with breast cancer

The U.S. population is now healthier and more long-lived than ever, and the average life expectancy for a woman born today is about 80 years. An elderly woman's life expectancy, which is related to comorbidity and functional status, is particularly important when determining the appropriate choice of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. In addition, the disease stage and the tumor's biologic characteristics (grade and hormone/human epidermal growth factor [HER]-2 receptor status) must be considered when formulating a treatment plan for 3 clinically distinctive breast cancer subgroups: (1) hormone receptor negative (HR-) and HER-2 negative ("triple-negative" tumors, about 15% of older patients); (2) hormone receptor positive (HR+) and HER-2 negative (the largest group comprising about 70% of older patients); and (3) HER-2 positive irrespective of HR status (about 15% of older patients). The functional status of an older woman can be estimated by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). A traditional CGA is time consuming, but testing of shorter, validated CGA instruments is ongoing. Monitoring toxicity in the elderly is especially important because even low-grade toxicity can have a significant effect on function. Eligible older women should be considered for state-of-the-art treatment, including clinical trials to determine the optimal adjuvant regimens for this patient population and how the therapies affect the woman's functioning and quality of life.

Impact of the Quality assured Mamma Diagnostic (QuaMaDi) programme on survival of breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the Quality assured Mamma Diagnostic programme (QuaMaDi) introduced in 2001 on breast cancer and mortality on a population basis. QuaMaDi provides a standardized diagnostic process for symptomatic or at risk women of all ages. The process includes independent double-reading of mammograms, additional ultrasound, and if suspicious an expert reading and assessment. We tested the hypothesis that QuaMaDi has influenced breast cancer epidemiology and survival positively.

METHODS

The QuaMaDi cohort of breast cancer patients, diagnosed within the programme between 2001 and 2007, was linked to the cancer registry dataset of all breast cancer cases in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. By this record-linkage procedure participants of QuaMaDi could be marked in the cancer registry data. Overall survival rates of 3096 patients diagnosed within QuaMaDi were compared to 5417 patients diagnosed outside QuaMaDi, matched by year of diagnosis, using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Crude hazard ratio for overall survival was HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.35-0.52) for breast cancer cases detected inside QuaMaDi versus those diagnosed outside the programme. After stepwise adjustment for age, grading, histology, treatment, and tumour stage, the survival advantage in QuaMaDi diagnosed breast cancer patients was still statistically significant (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.96).

CONCLUSION

Evidence is provided that the QuaMaDi programme has a beneficial impact on the first 5-year overall survival rate after breast cancer beyond a favourable tumour stage distribution. Thus, we conclude that QuaMaDi contributes to improved health care for women, who are not eligible for mammography screening.

Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen Consensus Statement for early breast cancer

Background

The 2007 St Gallen international expert consensus statement describes three risk categories and provides recommendations for treatment of early breast cancer. The set of recommendations on how to best treat primary breast cancer is recognized and used by clinicians worldwide. We now examine the variability of five-year survival of the 2007 St Gallen Risk Classifications utilizing the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes.

Methods

Using the population-based California Cancer Registry, 114,786 incident cases of Stages 1-3 invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2006 were identified. Cases were assigned to Low, Intermediate, or High Risk categories. Five-year-relative survival was computed for the three St Gallen risk categories and for the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes for further differentiation.

Results and Discussion

There were 9,124 (13%) cases classified as Low Risk, 44,234 (65%) cases as Intermediate Risk, and 14,340 (21%) as High Risk. Within the Intermediate Risk group, 33,735 (76%) were node-negative (Intermediate Risk 2) and 10,499 (24%) were node-positive (Intermediate Risk 3). For the High Risk group, 6,149 (43%) had 1 to 3 positive axillary lymph nodes (High Risk 4) and 8,191 (57%) had four or more positive lymph nodes (High Risk 5).

Using five-year relative survival as the principal criterion, we found the following: a) There was very little difference between the Low Risk and Intermediate Risk categories; b) Use of the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes within the Intermediate and High Risk categories separated each into a group with better five-year survival (ER-positive) and a group with worse survival (ER-negative), irrespective of HER2-status; c) The heterogeneity of the High Risk category was most evident when one examined the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes with four or more positive axillary lymph nodes; (d) HER2-positivity did not always translate to worse survival, as noted when one compared the triple positive subtype (ER+/PR+/HER2+) to the triple negative subtype (ER-/PR-/HER2-); and (e) ER-negativity appeared to be a stronger predictor of poor survival than HER2-positivity.

Conclusion

The use of ER/PR/HER2 subtype highlights the marked heterogeneity of the Intermediate and High Risk categories of the 2007 St Gallen statements. The use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes and correlation with molecular classification of breast cancer is recommended.

Outcome differences between patients with node-negative breast cancer classified according to the st. Gallen risk categories

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the 2007 St. Gallen risk categories with the outcomes of patients with node-negative breast cancer (NNBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1500 women with pathologically T1-T3 NNBC treated at the Clinic Hospital, Valencia University (Spain) from 1982 to 2000. Systemic adjuvant treatment was administered to 89.9% of the patients in the whole sample (37% received only hormonal therapy and 52.9% chemotherapy). The 2007 St. Gallen criteria were used to divide the whole sample into 1201 patients with intermediate risk (with > or = 1 of the following: pathologic tumor size > 2 cm, grade 2-3, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor absent, HER2/neu gene overexpressed or amplified, or age < 35 years) and 299 patients with low risk. Of the 1201 patients with intermediate risk, 56% received adjuvant chemotherapy. The intermediate- and low-risk groups were compared for relapse-free survival (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up of the entire sample was 61 months (range, 2-251 months). At 5 years, the overall RFS rate was 86%, and the BCSS rate was 95%. For low-risk patients, the RFS rate was 92%, and the BCSS rate was 98%. For intermediate-risk patients, the RFS rate was 84%, and the BCSS rate was 94%. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of RFS (P = .006) and BCSS (P = .041) independent of received treatment.

CONCLUSION

Using the St. Gallen risk categories resulted in significantly different outcomes for patients with NNBC. The St. Gallen classification might be a valuable clinical tool when assessing patients with NNBC.

Promoting evidence-based management of anemia in cancer patients: concurrent and discriminant validity of RESPOND, a web-based clinical guidance system based on the EORTC guidelines for supportive care in cancer

GOAL OF WORK

The goal of this study is to test the validity of RESPOND, a web-based decision support system to assess and manage anemia in cancer patients as per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines. The intraclass correlation metrics for the algorithmic definitions were reported previously. Reported here are the concurrent validity, the extent to which clinicians' anemia management is guidelines-congruent when using the system; and discriminant validity, the extent to which clinicians practice in congruence with guidelines when vs. when not using the system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Hybrid matched design with precohort (retrospective; clinicians not using RESPOND) and postcohort (prospective; clinicians using RESPOND) of anemic patients matched on cancer type and chemotherapy regimen and followed up over 4 months after treatment initiation with erythropoietic proteins (34 patients per cohort; total N = 68). Congruence scores quantified the extent to which anemia management was congruent with the EORTC guidelines (range 0-10).

MAIN RESULTS

Hemoglobin (Hb) increased significantly for both cohorts, but the postcohort group showed more rapid rate of Hb increase over time (p < 0.006), higher Hb by visit 4 (p = 0.007), and greater Hb increase by visit 4 (p = 0.006). Concurrent validity was high with mean postcohort congruence scores of 8.18 +/- 1.38. Discriminant validity was inferred from statistically significant differences in mean congruence scores between cohorts (p < 0.001) and from the postcohort having odds ratios of 3.64 for patients to reach Hb >or= 11 g/dL and 2.91 to achieve Hb >or= 12 g/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

RESPOND, a validated computerized clinical guidance system with an incremental effect beyond the pharmacotherapeutic effect of erythropoietic proteins, offers clinicians accurate and safe guidance in managing anemia in cancer patients.

Patterns of care in Dutch postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer participating in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial

BACKGROUND

The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial investigates the efficacy and safety of adjuvant exemestane alone and in sequence after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. As there was a nationwide participation in The Netherlands, we studied the variations in patterns of care in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Regions (CCCRs) and compliance with national guidelines.

METHODS

Clinicopathological characteristics, carried out local treatment strategies and adjuvant chemotherapy data were collected.

RESULTS

From 2001 to January 2006, 2754 Dutch patients were randomised to the study. Mean age of patients was 65 years (standard deviation 9). Tumours were < or =2 cm in 46% (within CCCRs 39%-50%), node-negative disease varied from 25% to 45%, and PgR status was determined in 75%-100% of patients. Mastectomy was carried out in 55% (45%-70%), sentinel lymph node procedure in 68% (42%-79%) and axillary lymph node dissections in 77% (67%-83%) of patients, all different between CCCRs (P < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 15%-70% of eligible patients (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In spite of national guidelines, breast cancer treatment on specific issues widely varied between the various Dutch regions. These data provide valuable information for breast cancer organisations indicating (lack of) guideline adherence and areas for breast cancer care improvement.

Comparison of breast cancer survival in two populations: Ardabil, Iran and British Columbia, Canada

Background

Patterns in survival can provide information about the burden and severity of cancer, help uncover gaps in systemic policy and program delivery, and support the planning of enhanced cancer control systems. The aim of this paper is to describe the one-year survival rates for breast cancer in two populations using population-based cancer registries: Ardabil, Iran, and British Columbia (BC), Canada.

Methods

All newly diagnosed cases of female breast cancer were identified in the Ardabil cancer registry from 2003 to 2005 and the BC cancer registry for 2003. The International Classification of Disease for Oncology (ICDO) was used for coding cancer morphology and topography. Survival time was determined from cancer diagnosis to death. Age-specific one-year survival rates, relative survival rates and weighted standard errors were calculated using life-tables for each country.

Results

Breast cancer patients in BC had greater one-year survival rates than patients in Ardabil overall and for each age group under 60.

Conclusion

These findings support the need for breast cancer screening programs (including regular clinical breast examinations and mammography), public education and awareness regarding early detection of breast cancer, and education of health care providers.

Curricula for teaching the content of clinical practice guidelines to family medicine and internal medicine residents in the US: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Teaching the content of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is important to both clinical care and graduate medical education. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of curricula for teaching the content of CPGs in family medicine and internal medicine residency programs in the United States.

METHODS

We surveyed the directors of family medicine and internal medicine residency programs in the United States. The questionnaire included questions about the characteristics of the teaching of CPGs: goals and objectives, educational activities, evaluation, aspects of CPGs that the program teaches, the methods of making texts of CPGs available to residents, and the major barriers to teaching CPGs.

RESULTS

Of 434 programs responding (out of 839, 52%), 14% percent reported having written goals and objectives related to teaching CPGs. The most frequently taught aspect was the content of specific CPGs (76%). The top two educational strategies used were didactic sessions (76%) and journal clubs (64%). Auditing for adherence by residents was the primary evaluation strategy (44%), although 36% of program directors conducted no evaluation. Programs made texts of CPGs available to residents most commonly in the form of paper copies (54%) while the most important barrier was time constraints on faculty (56%).

CONCLUSION

Residency programs teach different aspects of CPGs to varying degrees, and the majority uses educational strategies not supported by research evidence.

Breast Centers in Germany

A decrease in medical practice variations in national breast cancer care has been shown to improve survival and the negative impact of the disease on affected women and their families. The following report describes the concert of efforts undertaken by the medical societies to optimize national breast cancer care by organizational centralization of multidisciplinary medical competence in certified breast centers (CBC), aiming to attain continual quality of health care by implementation of evidence-and consensus-based guidelines. Centralization and the systematic pursuit of organizational development by tracking guideline adherence using performance quality indicators over time demonstrate the feasibility and practicability of the implementation concept to bridge the gap between determined scientific best evidence and applied best practice. However, the proof of concept will remain pending until the data of the population-based cancer registries are analyzed for survival estimates.

HER2 testing and subsequent trastuzumab treatment for breast cancer in a managed care environment

BACKGROUND

Degree of physician adherence to 2001 guidelines recommending routine testing of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status among newly diagnosed, recurrent, and metastatic breast cancer (BC) cases, and frequency of trastuzumab use in HER2-positive patients are not well documented.

METHODS

Patients newly diagnosed with BC managed by an identifiable hematologist/oncologist between June 1, 2005 and June 30, 2006 were identified from an administrative claims database of three health plans (n = 3,521). From these, a subset of 380 patients was identified for medical chart review. HER2 testing (occurrence, type of test used), HER2 status (positive, negative, unknown), and trastuzumab usage were evaluated.

RESULTS

HER2 testing occurred in 88% of all newly diagnosed patients with BC and in 98.1% of those with stage 1 or higher breast cancer (n = 322), for whom testing is recommended. Among those with HER2 testing performed (n = 335), 21.5% were positive (HER2(+)), 77.3% were negative (HER2(-)), and 1.2% were unknown. Of the 52 patients who used trastuzumab, only one patient did not have documented HER2 overexpression. Of the 45 HER2(+) women who had stage 2 or higher BC, 13% did not receive trastuzumab.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 testing status was extremely high among newly diagnosed BC patients treated by hematologists/oncologists in a managed care environment. There was almost no evidence of inappropriate prescribing of trastuzumab, but 1 of every 7.5 patients with HER2-overexpressing stage 2 or higher breast cancer did not receive the agent.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Older women with breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, and data on the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in such patients are scant. We tested for the noninferiority of capecitabine as compared with standard chemotherapy in women with breast cancer who were 65 years of age or older.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with stage I, II, IIIA, or IIIB breast cancer to standard chemotherapy (either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin) or capecitabine. Endocrine therapy was recommended after chemotherapy in patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumors. A Bayesian statistical design was used with a range in sample size from 600 to 1800 patients. The primary end point was relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

When the 600th patient was enrolled, the probability that, with longer follow-up, capecitabine therapy was highly likely to be inferior to standard chemotherapy met a prescribed level, and enrollment was discontinued. After an additional year of follow-up, the hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death in the capecitabine group was 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 3.17; P<0.001). Patients who were randomly assigned to capecitabine were twice as likely to have a relapse and almost twice as likely to die as patients who were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (P=0.02). At 3 years, the rate of relapse-free survival was 68% in the capecitabine group versus 85% in the standard-chemotherapy group, and the overall survival rate was 86% versus 91%. Two patients in the capecitabine group died of treatment-related complications; as compared with patients receiving capecitabine, twice as many patients receiving standard chemotherapy had moderate-to-severe toxic effects (64% vs. 33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to capecitabine in patients with early-stage breast cancer who are 65 years of age or older. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00024102.)

The gap between practice and guidelines in the choice of first-line disease modifying antirheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort

OBJECTIVE

To compare rheumatologists' prescription for first disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-life settings with 2 clinical practice guidelines (CPG), the French Society of Rheumatology/STPR 2004 and EULAR/ESCISIT 2007, and thus assess the gap between practices and guidelines. Method. ESPOIR was a French multicenter cohort study of 813 patients with early arthritis between 2002 and 2005. "Definite" and "probable" RA were defined according to ACR criteria and the level of diagnostic certainty. The objectives were to assess conformity between the observed first-line DMARD prescribed for those patients and the DMARD recommended in the guidelines; and to conduct a mail survey of patients' usual rheumatologists to investigate the reasons for their nonconformity with guidelines.

RESULTS

In total 627 patients with definite or probable RA were identified. Conformity rates were 58% for STPR guidelines and 54% for EULAR guidelines. At 6 months, 83 (34%) patients with early RA did not receive any DMARD. Main determinants associated with conformity to guidelines were disease activity and presence of severity-predictive factors. The main reason leading to a discrepancy between guidelines and daily practice appeared to be diagnostic uncertainty, i.e., the difficulty to reliably assess RA diagnosis as early as the first visits to the rheumatologist.

CONCLUSION

There is a substantial gap between CPG and rheumatologists' daily practice concerning the first DMARD to prescribe in early RA. This is explained mainly by diagnostic uncertainty. More attention should be paid in future guidelines to the diagnostic difficulties of early RA.