Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose: Results From a Multicenter Noninferiority Randomized Open-Label Controlled Trial Assessing Tocilizumab or Abatacept Injection Spacing in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission

OBJECTIVE

We assess the clinical and structural impact at two years of progressively spacing tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABA) injections versus maintenance at full dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission.

METHODS

This multicenter open-label noninferiority (NI) randomized clinical trial included patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission receiving ABA or TCZ at a stable dose. Patients were randomized to treatment maintenance (M) at full dose (M-arm) or progressive injection spacing (S) driven by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints every 3 months up to biologics discontinuation (S-arm). The primary end point was the evolution of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 44 joints during the 2-year follow-up analyzed per protocol with a linear mixed-effects model, evaluated by an NI test based on the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the slope difference (NI margin 0.25). Other end points were flare incidence and structural damage progression.

RESULTS

Overall, 202 of the 233 patients included were considered for per protocol analysis (90 in S-arm and 112 in M-arm). At the end of follow-up, 16.2% of the patients in the S-arm could discontinue their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, 46.9% tapered the dose and 36.9% returned to a full dose. NI was not demonstrated for the primary outcome, with a slope difference of 0.10 (95% CI 0.10-0.31) between the two arms. NI was not demonstrated for flare incidence (difference 42.6%, 95% CI 30.0-55.1) or rate of structural damage progression at two years (difference 13.9%, 95% CI -6.7 to 34.4).

CONCLUSION

The Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose trial failed to demonstrate NI for the proposed ABA or TCZ tapering strategy.

Evolution of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in patients treated with JAK inhibitors for rheumatic diseases: data from the MAJIK-SFR registry

OBJECTIVE

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is common, but there are scarce data regarding the effect of DMARDs on this premalignant condition. We aimed to evaluate the impact of JAK inhibitors (JAKis) on MGUS when initiated for an active rheumatic disease.

METHODS

Patients with monoclonal abnormality prior to JAKi initiation for an active rheumatic disease were identified through the MAJIK-SFR Registry, a French multicentre prospective study. Clinical and biological data were collected using a standardized case report form.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified with a mean age of 65 years and a diagnosis of RA (n = 15), PsA (n = 3), and axial SpA (n = 2). The JAKi prescribed was baricitinib (n = 9), tofacitinib (n = 6) or upadacitinib (n = 5), with a mean duration of 15.5 months. Seventeen patients had individualized serum monoclonal protein (IgG kappa n = 9; IgG lambda n = 4; IgM kappa n = 3; IgA lambda n = 1) ranging from 0.16 to 2.3 g/dl, and three patients did not have an initial measurable spike but they had a positive serum immunofixation. With a follow-up of 4-28 months, the serum monoclonal protein level decreased in 8 of 17 patients (47%), remained stable in 8 patients (47%) and increased in 1 patient (6%). The maximal decrease observed was an initial IgG kappa of 2.3 g/dl, decreasing to 0.2 g/dl at month 14.

CONCLUSION

This study provides reassuring and promising data on MGUS evolution in patients treated with JAKis for rheumatic diseases, which may guide the choice of treatment in patients with both conditions.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in patients who previously experienced immune-related inflammatory arthritis: a multicentre observational study

OBJECTIVE

Another course of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often considered in patients with cancer progression and previous immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA), but there are limited data regarding safety of ICI rechallenge in this setting. We aimed to assess the rate and clinical features associated with ICI-IA flare/recurrence on ICI rechallenge.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre observational study including cancer patients with ICI-IA who started a second course of ICI more than 3 months after ICI discontinuation in four French university hospitals. Primary outcome was the frequency of ICI flare/recurrence after ICI rechallenge.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included. At the time of ICI rechallenge, 18 patients reported no symptoms of ICI-IA (78%) and 5 had grade 1 (22%), 11 patients (48%) were not receiving any ICI-IA treatment, 11 (48%) were still on prednisone, 2 (9%) were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 1 (4%) on anti-IL-6. ICI-IA flare/recurrence occurred in 12 patients (52%) with a median time of 1 month after ICI rechallenge. ICI-IA phenotype, disease activity and ICI-IA treatment at the time of ICI rechallenge did not differ according to ICI-IA flare/recurrence status.

CONCLUSION

In this first observational study of ICI-IA patients rechallenged with ICI, about half of the patients experienced ICI-IA flare/recurrence with a similar phenotype but occurring earlier than the initial ICI-IA, warranting close monitoring during the first month of retreatment. Risk of flare did not differ according to baseline immunosuppressive treatment at the time of rechallenge.

Can efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of rituximab in RA be extrapolated? Insights from 1984 patients from the AIR-PR Registry

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the efficacy and safety data from drug-registration trials can be extrapolated to real-life RA patients receiving RTX.

METHODS

The AIR-PR registry is a French multicentre, prospective cohort of RA patients treated with RTX in a real-life setting. We compared treatment responses at 12 months and serious AEs between eligible and non-eligible patients, by retrieving the eligibility criteria of the three rituximab-registration trials. We determined critical eligibility criteria and modelled the benefit-risk ratio according to the number of fulfilled critical eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Among 1984 RA patients, only 9-12% fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Non-eligible patients had less EULAR response at 12 months (40.3% vs 46.9%, p= 0.044). Critical inclusion criteria included SJC ≥ 4, TJC ≥ 4, CRP ≥ 15 mg/l, and RF positivity. Critical exclusion criteria were age >80 years, RA-associated systemic diseases, ACR functional class IV, other DMARD than methotrexate, and prednisone > 10 mg/day. Only 20.8% fulfilled those critical eligibility criteria. During the first year, serious AEs occurred for 182 (9.2%) patients, (70.3% serious infections) and patients with ≥1 critical exclusion criterion were at higher risk (HR 3.03; 95%CI 2.25-4.06; for ≥ 3 criteria vs 0). The incremental risk-benefit ratio decreased with the number of unmet critical inclusion criteria and of fulfilled exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

Few real-life RA patients were eligible for the drug-registration trials. Non-eligible patients had lower chance of response, and higher risk of serious AEs. Efficacy and safety data obtained from those trials may not be generalizable to RA patients receiving RTX in real-world clinical practice.

Stricter treat-to-target in RA does not result in less radiographic progression: a longitudinal analysis in RA BIODAM

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy.

METHODS

Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval.

CONCLUSIONS

In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome.

Clinical and immunological features of patients with cancer-associated systemic sclerosis: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

Clinical and immunological features of patients with cancer-associated systemic sclerosis: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have reported an increased incidence of cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The presence of RNA polymerase III antibodies (anti-RNA Pol 3) associates with an increased risk of cancer, but other risk factors need yet to be identified. We aimed to assess clinical and immunological predictive factors of cancer-associated SSc to guide clinicians when setting up selective cancer screening.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, observational study of SSc patients with and without associated malignancy. Clinical, laboratory and imaging data were collected, as well as SSc treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of cancer and the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 464 SSc patients, 74 (16%) had cancer, with breast (n=26) and lung cancer (n=13) being the most frequent. Diagnosis of cancer was made less than 3 years before or after SSc diagnosis for 23 patients (31%). In a multivariate analysis, anti-RNA Pol 3 and anti-SSA antibodies were significantly associated with an increased overall risk of cancer with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.12 (95% CI [1.6-10.7]; P<0.01) and 2.43 (95% CI [1.1-5.4]; P<0.05), respectively. Age at diagnosis of SSc and delay from the SSc diagnosis were also independent risk factors of cancer. Interstitial lung disease and anti-topoisomerase antibodies were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and cancer occuring more than three years after SSc diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

In addition to anti-RNA Pol 3 antibodies, anti-SSA antibodies associated with an increased risk of cancer in SSc patients. Interstitial lung disease was a risk factor specifically for lung cancer and cancers diagnosed more than 3 years after SSc diagnosis. For these patients, a systematic and regular cancer screening should be considered.

Effects of Lumacaftor-Ivacaftor on Airway Microbiota-Mycobiota and Inflammation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Appear To Be Linked to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Chronic Colonization

The management of cystic fibrosis has been transformed recently by the advent of CFTR modulators, including lumacaftor-ivacaftor. However, the effects of such therapies on the airway ecosystem, particularly on the microbiota-mycobiota and local inflammation, which are involved in the evolution of pulmonary damage, are unclear.

Use of a bDMARD or tsDMARD for the management of inflammatory arthritis under checkpoint inhibitors: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

There is limited experience regarding the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and JAK inhibitor (JAKi) for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-induced inflammatory arthritis. We aimed to assess their efficacy and safety in this setting.

METHODS

Using the Club Rhumatismes and Inflammation French network, we conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study of patients with cancer diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis under ICI(s) and treated with bDMARD or JAKi. Clinical data were collected using a standardised case report form.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (60% men, median age 69.5 years) were included, with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-like (n=16), polymyalgia rheumatica-like (n=2) or psoriatic arthritis-like (n=2) clinical presentation. Two patients had pre-existing RA. 90% were treated with glucocorticoids as first-line therapy and 60% received methotrexate prior to bDMARD or JAKi. Anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) therapy was used in 13/20 patients (65%), leading to clinical improvement in 11/13 patients (85%), but one patient experienced intestinal perforation and cancer progression was noticed in 6/13 patients (46%). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors were used in 5/20 patients (25%), with improvement in 4/5 patients (80%) and cancer progression was observed in 3/5 patients (60%). Two infections (diverticulitis and pneumonitis) were reported. Anakinra, baricitinib and ustekinumab were each used in one patient. Median duration of the bDMARD or JAKi was 17 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Anti-IL-6R therapy is currently the most common strategy in patients with ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis and insufficient response to glucocorticoids and methotrexate, leading to improvement in &gt;80%. Overall, cancer progression occurred in about half of patients and whether the bDMARD/JAKi impacted the tumour response remains to be determined.

The benefit of augmenting open data with clinical data-warehouse EHR for forecasting SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations in Bordeaux area, France

Objective

To develop an accurate regional forecast algorithm to predict the number of hospitalized patients and to assess the benefit of the Electronic Health Records (EHR) information to perform those predictions.

Materials and Methods

Aggregated data from SARS-CoV-2 and weather public database and data-warehouse of the Bordeaux hospital were extracted from 2020-05-16 to 2022-01-17. The outcomes were the number of hospitalized patients in the Bordeaux Hospital at 7 and 14 days. We compared the performance of different data sources, feature engineering and machine learning models.

Results

During the period of 88 weeks, 2561 hospitalizations due to COVID19 were recorded at the Bordeaux Hospital. The model achieving the best performance was an elastic-net penalized linear regression using all available data with a median relative error at 7 and 14 days of 0.136 [0.063; 0.223] and 0.198 [0.105; 0.302] hospitalizations, respectively. Electronic health records (EHRs) from the hospital data-warehouse improved median relative error at 7 and 14 days by 10.9 and 19.8%, respectively. Graphical evaluation showed remaining forecast error was mainly due to delay in slope shift detection.

Discussion

Forecast model showed overall good performance both at 7 and 14 days which were improved by the addition of the data from Bordeaux Hospital data-warehouse.

Conclusion

The development of hospital data-warehouse might help to get more specific and faster information than traditional surveillance system, which in turn will help to improve epidemic forecasting at a larger and finer scale.

LAY SUMMARY

The objective of this work was to develop a forecast algorithm to predict the number of hospitalized patients at Bordeaux Hospital. In addition, we assessed the benefit of the Electronic Health Records (EHRs) information to perform those predictions.

To perform this task, we used data between 2020-05-16 and 2022-01-17 from national database on SARS-CoV-2 epidemics, public database on weather and the data-warehouse of the Bordeaux hospital. The outcomes were the number of hospitalized patients in the Bordeaux Hospital at 7 and 14 days.

During the period of 88 weeks, 2561 hospitalizations due to COVID19 were recorded at the Bordeaux Hospital. The best model had an error of 13.6% at 7 days and 19.8% at 14 days. EHRs from the hospital data-warehouse improved the performance by 10% at 7 days and 20% at 14 days. Graphical evaluation showed remaining forecast error was mainly due to delay in slope shift detection.

Forecast model showed overall good performance which were improved by the addition of EHRs data. The development of hospital data-warehouse might help to get more specific and faster information than traditional surveillance system, which in turn will help to improve epidemic forecasting at a larger and finer scale.

POS0700 IMPACT OF DELAYING INITIATION OF METHOTREXATE BY 1 MONTH ON THE OUTCOME OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AT 1 YEAR

Background

It is recommended that vaccinations should be performed prior to start methotrexate (MTX) knowing that delaying initiation of background therapy may have an impact on the progression of RA.

Objectives

To access the impact of delaying initiation of MTX by 1 month on the outcome of RA at 1 year.

Methods

The VACIMRA study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial comparing the vaccine protection obtained in patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 1-month delay between anti-pneumococcal vaccine PCV13 and methotrexate initiation in one arm, versus immediate introduction of MTX following vaccination in the other arm. We analyzed disease activity based on DAS28-ESR at baseline (M0), 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months between the 2 groups. For structural progression, we performed a radiographic analysis of 79 RA patients included in the Montpellier center at baseline, 6 and 12 months. This analysis was performed by the same physician two times, blinded to the patient’s group. Structural damage progression at 6 months and 1 year was assessed according to van-der-Heijde-modified Sharp score (vSHS) on radiographs performed at inclusion, at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Comparisons of the means of activity scores and radiographic scores were made with the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

Results

Of the 276 patients randomized, 261 could be analyzed (131 in the IMMEDIATE group and 130 in the DELAY group). At inclusion, there were no significant differences in demographic, disease activity (DAS28-ESR), biological and radiographic characteristics between the 2 groups (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

VariableModalityTotal populationGROUP IMMEDIATEGROUPE DELAYpGender, n(%)N=261n=131n=1300.97Man74 (28.35)37 (28.24)37 (28.46)Woman187 (71.65)94 (71.76)93 (71.54)Age (years)Mean (± SD)55.74 (± 14.68)55.31 (± 15.27)56.16 (± 14.11)0.76MTX true naive (n(% col))No13 (4.98)8 (6.11)5 (3.85)0.40yes248 (95.02)123 (93.89)125 (96.15)Age at diagnosis (years)Mean (± SD)N=205 55.86 (± 15.16)n=98 55.31 (± 16.07)n=107 56.37 (± 14.34)0.80Positive rheumatoid factorn(% col)166 (64.59)84 (65.12)82 (64.06)0.86Positive ACPAn(% col)174 (68.24)89 (68.99)85 (67.46)0.79CRP (mg/L)Mean (± SD)N=260 17.62 (± 24.87)n=131 15.36 (± 17.95)n=129 19.91 (± 30.23)0.65DAS28-ESRMean (± SD)N=249 5.01 (± 1.11)n=125 5.03 (± 1.13)n=12 4.98 (± 1.10)0.54Sharp modified VdH total radiographic scoreMean (± SD)N=93 1.53 (± 3.62)n=47 1.57 (± 3.68)n=46 1.48 (± 3.60)0.88

DAS 28-ESR evolution during 1 year of follow-up

There was a significant difference in the means of DAS28-ESR at 1 month between the DELAY and IMMEDIAT groups (3.96 ± 1.46 vs 3.41 ± 1.33; p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the means of DAS28-ESR between the 2 groups at 3 months (3.19± 1.46 in the 2 groups p<0.91), at 6 months (3.11 ± 1.42 vs 3.24 ± 1.43; p=0.46, respectively) and at 12 months (2.96 ± 1.34 vs 2.98 ± 1.26p=0.89) (Graphic). Similarly, there was no significant difference in mean radiographic scores at 6 months (2.00 ± 4.41 vs. 1.80 ± 4.03 p=0.81) or at 12 months (2.23 ± 4.86 vs. 2.00 ± 4.07 p=0.93).

There was no significant variation between radiographic scores at 6 months compared to baseline in either group (mean difference 0.21 ± 0.52 vs. 0.36 ± 1.01, p=0.90) nor at 12 months compared to baseline (mean difference 0.40 ± 1.06 vs. 0.62 ± 1.58, p=0.85).

Conclusion

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, initiation of methotrexate 1 month after PCV13 vaccination has no significant impact on RA activity and structural outcome at 1 year. Performing vaccinations 1 month before starting MTX can be proposed without significant impact on RA outcome at 1 year.

Figure 1.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0410 EVOLUTION OF MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH JAK INHIBITORS FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES (JAKPIC STUDY)

Background

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) is common in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases but there are scarce data regarding the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on this pre-malignant condition. Recently, preclinical data and phase I trial have shown efficacy of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in multiple myeloma.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the impact of JAKi on MGUS when initiated for an active rheumatic disease.

Methods

Patients with monoclonal abnormality prior to JAKi initiation for an active rheumatic disease were identified through the MAJIK-SFR Registry, a french multicentre prospective study, and a call for observation via the “Club Rhumatismes et Inflammations”. Clinical and biological data were collected using a standardised case report form.

Results

Nineteen patients were identified, 10 women and 9 men, with a mean age of 65 years and a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (n=14), psoriatic arthritis (n=3) or spondyloarthritis (n=2). The JAKi prescribed was baricitinib (n=8), tofacitinib (n=6) or upadacitinib (n=5), with a mean duration of 13 months.

Sixteen patients had individualized serum monoclonal protein (IgG Kappa n=9; IgG Lambda n=6; IgM Kappa n=3; IgA Lambda n=1) ranging from 0,16g/dL to 2,3g/dL. With a follow-up of 2 to 47 months, 8 of 16 patients experienced a decrease in serum monoclonal protein level and 8 had a stable serum monoclonal protein level. The maximal decrease observed was an initial IgG Kappa of 2.3g/dL decreasing to 0.2g/dL at month 14. During follow-up, two patients did not have any detectable serum monoclonal protein on serum electrophoresis (initial value of 5.2g/l and 1.6g/l), but still a positive immunofixation. One patient had bone marrow aspirate with 8% of plasma cells before JAKi introduction and 3% after 4 months of treatment.

Three patients did not have initial measurable spike but a positive immunofixation that became negative at month 8 and 11 (IgG Lambda, n=2) or stable (IgG Kappa, n=1).

Conclusion

This study brings reassuring and promising data on the MGUS evolution in patients treated with JAKi for rheumatic diseases, which may guide the choice of treatment in patients with both conditions.

References

[1]Berenson JR, To J, Spektor TM, et al. A Phase I Study of Ruxolitinib, Lenalidomide, and Steroids for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple MyelomaClin Cancer Res. 2020 May 15;26(10):2346-2353.

Acknowledgements

MAJIK-SFR Registry and Club Rhumatismes et Inflammations

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0111 MORE METICULOUSLY FOLLOWING TREAT-TO-TARGET IN RA DOES NOT LEAD TO LESS RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION: A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS IN BIODAM

Background

A Treat-to-Target approach (T2T) is broadly considered to lead to better clinical outcomes and recommended in patients with RA. However, very few studies have analyzed the effect of T2T on radiographic progression, and any such studies have provided inconsistent results.

Objectives

To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice leads to lower radiographic progression in RA.

Methods

Patients from the multicenter RA-BIODAM cohort with ≥2 consecutive visits with radiographs available were included. In RA-BIODAM patients were enrolled as they were initiating a new csDMARD/bDMARD treatment were followed-up with the intention to benchmark and intensify treatment. The primary outcome of this analysis was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde score (SvdH, 0-448), assessed every 6 months, using average scores from 2 readers (scores with known chronological order). Following a DAS44-T2T remission strategy, which was defined at each 3-month visit, was the main variable of interest. Patients were categorized based on the proportion of visits in which T2T was followed according to our definition: very low (≤40% of the visits, low (>40%, <62.5%), high (≥62.5%, ≤75%) and very high (>75%). Radiographic progression at 2 years was visualized across groups by cumulative probability plots. Per 3-month interval T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of 2 visits). Associations between the number of visits with T2T in an interval and radiographic progression, both in the same and in the subsequent 6-month interval, were analysed by generalised estimating equations, adjusted for age, gender, disease duration and country.

Results

In total, 511 patients were included (mean (SD) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female). After 2 years, patients showed on average 2.2 (4.1) units progression (median:1 unit). Mean (SD) 2-year progression was not significantly different across categories of T2T: very low: 2.1 (2.7)-units; low: 2.8 (6.0); high: 2.4 (4.5), very high: 1.6 (2.2) (Figure 1). Meticulously following-up T2T in a 3-month interval neither reduced progression in the same 6-month interval (parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95%CI: -0.04 to 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06;0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits) nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval (Table 1).

Table 1.

Effect of following DAS44-remission-T2T strategy on 6-month radiographic progression over 2 years

Change in radiographic damage(regression coefficient (95% CI))N=506T2T during 3 months on radiographic progression in the same 6-month period 2 visits vs 0 followed0.15 (-0.04; 0.33) 1 visit vs 0 followed0.08 (-0.06; 0.22)T2T during 3 months on radiographic progression in the subsequent 6-month period 2 visits vs 0 followed-0.09 (-0.28; 0.10) 1 visit vs 0 followed-0.10 (-0.24; 0.05)Figure 1.

Cumulative probability plot with 2-year radiographic progression according to the proportion of 3-monthly visits with T2T followed

Conclusion

In this daily practice cohort, more meticulously following T2T principles did not result in more reduction of radiographic progression than a somewhat more liberal attitude toward T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome.

Acknowledgements

BIODAM was financially supported by an unrestricted grant from AbbVie

Disclosure of Interests

Sofia Ramiro Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Robert B.M. Landewé Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Galapagos, GSK,Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Galapagos, GSK,Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB

Dr Landewé owns Rheumatology Consultancy BV, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Cyxone, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv., Alexandre Sepriano Speakers bureau: Novartis, Consultant of: UCB, Oliver FitzGerald Speakers bureau: Biogen, Novartis, AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: BMS, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, Mikkel Østergaard Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Merck, Celgene and Novartis, Joanne Homik: None declared, Ori Elkayam Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, BI, Janssen, Consultant of: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, BI, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Janssen, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Organon, Pfizer, Sandoz, Maggie Larché Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Fresenius-Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sobi, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Gianfranco Ferraccioli Speakers bureau: SOBI, Consultant of: Abbivie, Marina Backhaus: None declared, Gilles Boire Speakers bureau: Abbvie Canada, BMS Canada, Lilly Canada, Janssen Canada, Merck Canada, Pfizer Canada, Viatris, Consultant of: Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, BMS Canada, Celgene, GileadSciences, Janssen Canada, Lilly Canada, Merck Canada, Mylan Canada, Novartis Canada, Pfizer Canada, Roche Canada, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Canada, Teva, Grant/research support from: Lilly Canada, BMS Canada, Pfizer, Sandoz Canada, UCB Canada, Merck Canada, Novartis Canada, Roche Canada, Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS,Celltrion,Galapgos-Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, MERCK, Pfizer,Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celltrion,Galapgos-Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, MERCK, Roche-Chugai, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche-chugai, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Alain Saraux Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Fresenius, Lilly, Maxime Dougados Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, UCB, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, BMS, Galapagos, Biogen, Roche, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, UCB, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, BMS, Galapagos, Biogen, Roche, Maurizio Rossini Speakers bureau: Amgen, Abbvie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos,MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Theramex, UCB, Marcello Govoni Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Galapagos, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Luigi Sinigaglia: None declared, Alain Cantagrel Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Lilly France, Médac, MSD France, Nordic-Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, UCB, Consultant of: BMS, Janssen, Lilly France, MSD France, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: MSD France, Novartis, Pfizer, Cornelia Allaart: None declared, Cheryl Barnabe Speakers bureau: Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Consultant of: Gilead, Celltrion Healthcare, Clifton Bingham Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: BMS, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg: None declared, Hilde Berner Hammer Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Lilly, Rana Dadashova: None declared, Edna Hutchings: None declared, Joel Paschke: None declared, Walter P Maksymowych Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer

Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events

PURPOSE

As gut microbiota composition is an important determinant of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we examined the effect of various co-medications known for their interaction with microbiota, when given at ICI initiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI between May 2015 and September 2017 in our institution. Co-medications given within 1 month before or 1 month after the first administration of ICI were reviewed from medical records. Survival data were analysed with univariable Cox regression, and the combined effect of multiple factors was assessed with factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurrence was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 635 patients were included. Psychotropic drugs (41%), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 38%), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs; 32%), glucocorticoids (26%), antibiotics (24%), statins (21%) and morphine (20%) were the most prescribed co-medications. Baseline use of antibiotics, glucocorticoids >10 mg/day, PPIs, psychotropic drugs, morphine and insulin was associated with significantly shortened overall survival and decreased tumour response, whereas coadministration of statins, ACEs and/or ARBs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and oral antidiabetic drugs did not impact patient outcomes. Treatments that altered the response to ICI were also associated with a decreased incidence of irAEs. FAMD revealed the respective weight of each factor or co-medication on the oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Co-medications must be carefully assessed at the time of ICI initiation and clinicians aware of their possible deleterious effect, notably for PPIs, glucocorticoids, antibiotics and psychotropic drugs.

MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 and rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease survival and progression

BACKGROUND

The major risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), MUC5B rs35705950, was found to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Whilst the MUC5B rs35705950 T risk allele has been associated with better survival in IPF, its impact on RA-ILD prognosis remains to be determined. Our objective was to explore the influence of MUC5B rs35705950 on survival and progression in RA-ILD.

METHODS

Through an international retrospective observational study, patients with RA-ILD were genotyped for the MUC5B rs35705950 variant and consecutive pulmonary function tests (PFTs) findings were collected. Longitudinal data up to a 10-year follow-up were considered and analyzed using mixed regression models. Proportional hazards and joint proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association of baseline and longitudinal variables with lung transplant-free survival. Significant progression of RA-ILD was defined as at least an absolute or relative 10% decline of forced vital capacity at 2 years from baseline.

RESULTS

Out of 321 registered patients, 261 were included in the study: 139 women (53.3%), median age at RA-ILD diagnosis 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57 to 71), 151 ever smokers (59.2%). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (IQR 1.3 to 6.6). Mortality rate was 32% (95%CI 19 to 42) at 10 years. The MUC5B rs35705950 variant did not impact lung transplant-free survival (HR for the T risk allele carriers=1.26; 95%CI 0.61 to 2.62; P=0.53). Decline in pulmonary function at 2 years was not influenced by MUC5B rs35705950 (OR=0.95; 95%CI 0.44 to 2.05; P=0.89), irrespective of the HRCT pattern.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the MUC5B rs35705950 promoter variant did not influence transplant- free survival or decline in pulmonary function in patients with RA-ILD.

The response to TNF blockers depending on their comparator in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: the lessebo effect, a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of the biological reference agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in pivotal superiority placebo-controlled trials (reference agent vs placebo) vs their effect in equivalence active comparator-controlled trials (reference agent vs biosimilar).

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, databases were searched for randomized, double-blind, controlled trials up to March 2020 comparing a biological reference agent vs placebo or biosimilar. The study assessed the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses of the reference agent in these groups (Reference-pbo and Reference-bs, respectively). The effect of the reference agent in both groups was estimated with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), pooled using random-effects models and then compared using a meta-regression model.

RESULTS

We included 31 trials. The main characteristics of the population (disease duration and activity, % seropositivity and methotrexate dose) of the population in both groups were similar. The meta-analysis found a better ACR20 response to the biological originator in the Reference-bs group with a global rate of 70% (95%CI, 66-74) compared with 59% (95%CI, 55-62) in the reference-pbo group (p= 0.001). A significant difference was also found for ACR 50 [44% (95%CI, 39-50) vs 35% (95%CI, 31-39) respectively, p< 0.01].

CONCLUSION

Effect of the reference biologic agent was better when compared with an active drug to a placebo. This could be linked to an increased placebo effect in active comparator-controlled studies or a nocebo effect in placebo-controlled studies. This effect can be called the Lessebo effect.

TGFβ promotes low IL10-producing ILC2 with profibrotic ability involved in skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Innate lymphoid cells-2 (ILC2) were shown to be involved in the development of lung or hepatic fibrosis. We sought to explore the functional and phenotypic heterogeneity of ILC2 in skin fibrosis within systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

Blood samples and skin biopsies from healthy donor or patients with SSc were analysed by immunostaining techniques. The fibrotic role of sorted ILC2 was studied in vitro on dermal fibroblast and further explored by transcriptomic approach. Finally, the efficacy of a new treatment against fibrosis was assessed with a mouse model of SSc.

RESULTS

We found that ILC2 numbers were increased in the skin of patients with SSc and correlated with the extent of skin fibrosis. In SSc skin, KLRG1^- ILC2 (natural ILC2) were dominating over KLRG1⁺ ILC2 (inflammatory ILC2). The cytokine transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), whose activity is increased in SSc, favoured the expansion of KLRG1^- ILC2 simultaneously decreasing their production of interleukin 10 (IL10), which regulates negatively collagen production by dermal fibroblasts. TGFβ-stimulated ILC2 also increased myofibroblast differentiation. Thus, human KLRG1^- ILC2 had an enhanced profibrotic activity. In a mouse model of SSc, therapeutic intervention-combining pirfenidone with the administration of IL10 was required to reduce the numbers of skin infiltrating ILC2, enhancing their expression of KLRG1 and strongly alleviating skin fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate a novel role for natural ILC2 and highlight their inter-relationships with TGFβ and IL10 in the development of skin fibrosis, thereby opening up new therapeutic approaches in SSc.

Selectins impair regulatory T cell function and contribute to systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a loss of tolerance toward self-nucleic acids, autoantibody production, interferon expression and signaling, and a defect in the regulatory T (T_reg) cell compartment. In this work, we identified that platelets from patients with active SLE preferentially interacted with T_reg cells via the P-selectin/P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) axis. Selectin interaction with PSGL-1 blocked the regulatory and suppressive properties of T_reg cells and particularly follicular T_reg cells by triggering Syk phosphorylation and an increase in intracytosolic calcium. Mechanistically, P-selectin engagement on T_reg cells induced a down-regulation of the transforming growth factor-β axis, altering the phenotype of T_reg cells and limiting their immunosuppressive responses. In patients with SLE, we found an up-regulation of P- and E-selectin both on microparticles and in their soluble forms that correlated with disease activity. Last, blocking P-selectin in a mouse model of SLE improved cardinal features of the disease, such as anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations and kidney pathology. Overall, our results identify a P-selectin-dependent pathway that is active in patients with SLE and validate it as a potential therapeutic avenue.

AB0469 PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS MAY IMPAIR RESPONSE TO TNF-INHIBITORS IN SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background:

Considering the potential role of the gut microbiota in the pathophysiology of spondyloarthritis (SpA) as in the therapeutic response to biologics (1), we evaluated the hypothesis that co-medications known to interfere with the gut microbiota could impair the therapeutic response to TNF-inhibitors (TNF-i) in SpA patients. This was first suggested by the results of a retrospective cohort showing that a co-medication with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antibiotics was significantly associated with a decreased chance to respond to a first TNF-I, independently of each other (2).

Objectives:

To validate in a replication cohort the potential negative association between therapeutic response to TNF-i and co-medication with commonly used drugs.

Methods:

Demographic information and disease characteristics were retrospectively collected. Patients were classified as responder (R) or non-responder (NR) according to the BASDAI (< 40/100) value at month 6 or to the clinician judgment (when BASDAI was not available). We collected all drugs known to interfere with the gut microbiota that were administered 1 month before and during the first 3 months of the TNF-i treatment. We only considered drugs given to more than 5% of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between co-medications, predictors of response known from literature and TNF-i response. All analyses were computed on STATA 13.1 with a statistically significant threshold of 0.05.

Results:

We included from 4 different centres 185 patients having axial SpA with radiographic or magnetic sacroiliitis in 75% and 73% of cases, respectively. One third of them had peripheral involvement. 73% were B27 positive. TNF-i administrated were infliximab (8%), etanercept (22%), adalimumab (44%) golimumab (19%), certolizumab (7%). 127 patients (69%) were considered as R. 59.4% of patients who received NSAIDs were R, compared to 81% not treated with NSAIDs (p< 0.0001). 43,3% of patients receiving PPIs were R compared to 83% of patients PPI free (p< 0.0001). Differences were not significant for antibiotics, methotrexate (MTX), psychotic drugs and corticosteroids. Considering known predictors of response, a magnetic sacroiliitis and the age at TNF-i initiation were significantly associated with a higher proportion of R patients (p=0.048 and 0.018 respectively). In multivariate analysis, PPIs intake remained associated with a poorer response to a first TNF-i (p<0.001), even though 88% of patients exposed to PPIs received also NSAIDs.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysisOdd Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)Gender1.43 (0.76; 2.72)Disease duration1.02 (0.99; 1.06)Age at TNF-I initiation0.97 (0.95; 0.995) 0.97 (0.94; 0.999)Magnetic sacroiliitis0.46 (0.21; 0.99)0.63 (0.26; 1.52)Baseline BASDAI1.02 (0.99;1.04)Baseline CRP0.99 (0.98; 1.02)Positive B270.81 (0.4;1.68)Peripheral involvement0.79 (0.4; 1.56)NSAIDs2.91 (1.47; 5.77)1.08 (0.41; 2.79)PPIs6.4 (3.25; 12.7)6.9 (2.8;17)Antibiotics1.87 (0.84; 4.16)Psychotics1.94 (0.75; 4.97)Corticosteroids1.11 (0.39; 3.11)Methotrexate2.29 (0.97; 5.38)

Conclusion:

Co-medication with PPIs was considered as an independent factor associated with TNF-i failure. The hypothesis that this effect is due to their interference with the gut microbiota is only speculative but, regardless of the reason for this interaction, clinicians should be aware of the potential negative effect on TNF-i response.

References:

[1]Bazin, T., Hooks, K.B., Barnetche, T. et al. Microbiota Composition May Predict Anti-Tnf Alpha Response in Spondyloarthritis Patients: an Exploratory Study. Sci Rep8, 5446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23571-4

[2]Masson M, Kostine M, Barnetche T, Truchetet ME, Richez C, Schaeverbeke T. Ab0661 Co-Medications May Alter the Response to Tnf-Inhibitors in Spondyloarthritis Patients: A Pharmacomicrobiomic Effect? Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1 juin 2020;79(Suppl 1):1625–6.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

OP0181 CURRENT FAVOURABLE 10-YEAR OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DATA FROM THE ESPOIR COHORT

Background:

ESPOIR is a longitudinal prospective cohort of adults with possible early RA (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03666091). Patients were referred by rheumatologists and general practitioners to one of the 14 regional centers in France. The objective and design of the cohort are described elsewhere (1). Patients received standard of care by their rheumatologists and were followed without predefined therapeutic strategies

Objectives:

To report the current 10-year outcome of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the ESPOIR cohort, and predictors of outcome.

Methods:

From 2003 to 2005, 813 patients were included if they had early arthritis (< 6 months) with a high probability of RA developing and had never been prescribed disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of outcome.

Results:

In total, 521 (64.1%) RA patients were followed up for 10 years and 35 (4.3%) died, which appears similar to the French general population. Overall, 480 (92.1%) patients received a DMARD; 174/521 (33.4%) received at least one biologic DMARD, 13.6 and 23.4% within 2 and 5 years. At year 10 (Table), mean DAS28 ESR was 2.5 ± 1.3; 273 (52.4%) patients were in DAS28 remission, 39.7% in CDAI remission, 40.1% in DAS28 sustained remission, and 14.1% in drug-free remission. Disability was well controlled overtime (Figure) and half of the patients achieved a HAQ Disability Index < 0.5; the SF-36 physical component and pain were well controlled. Structural progression was weak, with a mean change from baseline in modified Sharp score of 11.0 ± 17.9. A total of 82 (16.5%) patients required joint surgery including arthroplasty or arthrodesis in only 6.5% of the cases. A substantial number of patients showed new comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular or metabolic diseases over 10 years. Finally, positivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies was confirmed as a robust predictor of long-term outcome in patients with early RA.

Table 1.

Outcome in ESPOIR cohort and 1993 cohort at 10 years

ESPOIR cohort n=5211993 cohort n=112DAS28 ESR2.5 ± 1.3DAS44-2.2 ± 0.9SDAI7.5 ± 8.7CDAI6.8 ±8.3DAS28 ESR remission (n (%)273 (52.4)CDAI remission207 (39.7)DAS28 sustained remission, n (%)209 (40.1)DAS28 drug-free remission, n (%)75 (14.1)DAS28 ESR LDA336 (64.5)Rheumatoid nodules39 (7.5)Sicca syndrome314 (60.3)Patient global assessment24.0 ± 24.0HAQ DI score0.5 ± 0.60.75 ± 0.71HAQ DI < 0.5, n (%)280 (54.5)SF36 MCS46.7 ± 10.5SF36 PCS44.6 ± 9.2Pain (mm, VAS)16.6 ± 20.6Fatigue (mm, VAS)31.4 ± 27.023.2 ± 23.0ESR (mm/hr)14.4 ± 13.818.4 ± 16.5CRP level (mg/l)6.4 ± 16.59.3 ± 11.7Normal CRP (< 5 mg/l), n (%)336 (67.6)Total mSharp score*13.8 ± 19.635.4 ± 46.1Erosion score4.9 ± 9.418.4 ± 26.5)Joint narrowing score8.9 ± 12.132.1 ±23.2Joint surgery82 (16.5)26 (23.2)Joint arthroplasty/arthrodesis34 (6.5)20 (17.9)

Data are mean (SD)

DAS28, disease activity in 28 joints; HAQ DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; SF36 MCS, Medial Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form mental component summary; SF36 PCS, Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form physical component summary; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; VAS, visual analog scale; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index; *van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp score

Figure 1.

Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) over 10 years Data are mean (SD).

Conclusion:

We report a very mild 10-year outcome of a large inception cohort of patients with early RA diagnosed in the early 2000s, which was much better than results for a previous cohort of early RA patients who were recruited in 1993. This current favourable outcome may be related to more intensive care for real-life patients than previously.

References:

[1]Combe B et al. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. 2007;74:440–5

Acknowledgements:

We thank MC Boissier, G Falgaronne and F. Lioté for help in patient recruitment. An unrestricted grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) was allocated for the first 5 years of the cohort study. Two additional grants from INSERM supported part of the biological database. The French Society of Rheumatology, Abbvie, Pfizer, Lilly and more recently Fresenius and Biogen supported the ESPOIR cohort.

Disclosure of Interests:

Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: AbbVie; BMS; Gilead; Lilly; Merck; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai;, Consultant of: AbbVie; BMS; Gilead; Janssen; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; and Sanofi;, Grant/research support from: Fresenius, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai., Nathalie Rincheval: None declared, Francis Berenbaum Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Bone Therapeutics, Expanscience, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Merck Sereno, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Regulaxis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Peptinov, TRB Chemedica, 4Moving Biotech, 4P Pharma, Consultant of: Boehringer, Bone Therapeutics, Expanscience, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Merck Sereno, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Regulaxis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Peptinov, TRB Chemedica, 4Moving Biotech, 4P Pharma, Patrick BOUMIER: None declared, Alain Cantagrel Speakers bureau: AbbVie; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Grunenthal; Lilly; Medac; MSD France; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi;, Consultant of: AbbVie; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Grunenthal; Lilly; Medac; MSD France; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi;, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Fresenius, MSD France, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Philippe Dieudé Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Lilly, Medac, Novartis Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Lilly, Medac, Novartis Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer., Maxime Dougados Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, UCB, Merck, BMS, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis, and Sandoz, Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, UCB, Merck, BMS, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis, and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, UCB, Merck, BMS, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis, and Sandoz, Bruno Fautrel Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD and Pfizer, René-Marc Flipo Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai and Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai and Sanofi-Genzyme, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche-Chugai, Philippe Goupille Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB., Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, MSD, Pfizer, Xavier Mariette Speakers bureau: BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and UCB., Consultant of: BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and UCB., Grant/research support from: Servier, Alain Saraux Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi and UCB, Grant/research support from: Roche-Chugai, Thierry Schaeverbeke Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Roche, UCB, Astra, MSD, Rigel, AB-sciences, Jean Sibilia Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Novartis., Consultant of: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Novartis., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Olivier VITTECOQ Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer; Roche-Chugai, Mylan and Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer; Roche-Chugai, Mylan and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Jean-Pierre Daures: None declared

POS0225 RISK OF MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENT ACROSS JAK INHIBITOR TREATED PATIENTS: ANALYSIS OF A NATIONAL CLAIM DATABASE

Background:

Inhibiting a specific JAK may impede more than one pathway, explaining both the efficacy and adverse effects observed with JAK inhibitors (JAKi). Among those, there have been recent concerns about potential thromboembolic risks with these drugs. As patients enrolled are not representative of all patients who may receive JAKi, data from trials are unlikely to provide definitive answers. Real impact of JAKi in real life on major cardiovascular events is not known.

Objectives:

To evaluate the risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events with the use of JAKi in a real-world setting.

Methods:

A self-controlled case series analysis (method in which individuals act as their own control) was performed using data from the French national healthcare insurance system SNDS (“Système National des Données de Santé”), which included all anonymized individual level data about sociodemographic data, outpatient healthcare dispensed, hospital discharge summaries, and registration status for a list of 30 long term diseases. All patients treated by JAKi (baricitinib or tofacitinib) for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis arthritis and/or inflammatory bowel disease, and with at least one thromboembolic event (venous (VTE): deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), arterial (ATE): acute coronary syndrome (ACS), myocardial infarction (MI), transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke) between 2017/11/01 and 2019/06/30 were included in the study. Associations were evaluated by incidence rate ratios (IRR), which compare the rate of events during exposed periods with rate of event during all other observed time periods. Exposed periods were defined as i) exposure to JAKi, ii) the month following exposure (post-exposure 1-30 days), and iii) long-term post-exposure (31 to 60 days). A pre-exposure period of 7 days was individualized to identify event-dependent probabilities of exposure and potential reverse causality bias, and all other periods were considered as non-exposed periods.

Results:

Among the 5,870 patients treated with JAKi between 2017/11/01 and 2019/06/30, 94 presented an incident thromboembolic event and were included. Almost two thirds were female (n=61, 64.9%), and median age was 65.4 [IQR: 55.5; 75.8] years. Most of patients have a rheumatoid arthritis (n=91, 96.8%), 62 (66.0%) were treated by baricitinib, and 32 (34.0%) by tofacitinib. Almost half (n=42, 44.7%) presented a venous thromboembolism, mainly DVT (n=31, 33.0%), and 52 (55.3%) presented an arterial thromboembolism, mainly MI (n=16, 17.0%) and stroke (n=14, 14.9%). Eleven patients (11.7%) died during the study period. The median time of occurrence of VTE was 4.3 [IQR: 2.5; 8.9] months, and 6.1 [IQR: 3.3; 9.2] months for ATE.

The median duration of exposure was 6.0 [IQR: 3.3; 10.1] months for VTE, and 12.0 [IQR: 4.8; 15.3] months for ATE. The IRR for VTE and ATE were increased during exposure, and during the 30 days following exposure (Table 1). The IRR for VTE was only increased during exposure and in the early post-exposure phase contrary to the IRR for ATE that was also increased in the pre-exposure 7-Day period. Analysis conducted on survival patients confirmed results.

Table 1.NPatient-yearsIRR95%CIVenous thromboembolic eventsNon-exposure (reference)83975.01-Pre-exposure to JAK-i1135.24.70.6-38.0Exposure to JAK-i272090.59.84.1-23.3Post-exposure 1-30 d5369.06.21.9-19.9Post-exposure 31-60 d1139.01.50.2-12.6Arterial thromboembolic eventsNon-exposure (reference)74076.81-Pre-exposure to JAK-i3344.111.52.8-46.8Exposure to JAK-i326363.87.42.9-18.7Post-exposure 1-30 d8659.211.53.8-34.6Post-exposure 31-60 d2132.24.30.8-22.0

Conclusion:

The present study found an increased risk of VTE and ATE for baricitinib and tofacitinib. The risk persists in the month following the discontinuation of treatment but disappears after day 30 post-exposure.

Disclosure of Interests:

Amandine Gouverneur: None declared, Jérôme Avouac Consultant of: JA has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for rheumatoid arthritis from (last three years): Abbvie, Galapagos, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Chugai and MSD., Grant/research support from: JA has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for rheumatoid arthritis from (last three years): Abbvie, Galapagos, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Chugai and MSD., Clément Prati: None declared, Jean-Luc Cracowski: None declared, Thierry Schaeverbeke Consultant of: TS consultancy and/or research fundings: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, BMS, Medac, NordicPharma, Biogen, Mylan, Janssen., Grant/research support from: TS consultancy and/or research fundings: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, BMS, Medac, NordicPharma, Biogen, Mylan, Janssen., Antoine Pariente Grant/research support from: AP reports acting as an independant expert towards the French Medicines Agency (Agence Nationale de Securité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé, ANSM) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). AP coordinates the DRUGS Systematised Assessment in real-liFe EnviRonment (DRUGS-SAFER) programme funded by the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM)., Marie-Elise Truchetet Consultant of: has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis and their complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Galapagos, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche., Grant/research support from: has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis and their complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Galapagos, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche.

Risk of Diverticulitis and Gastrointestinal Perforation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tocilizumab Compared to Rituximab or Abatacept

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of diverticulitis and gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) in rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) compared with rituximab (RTX) and abatacept (ABA).

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study using 3 observational French registries on TCZ, RTX and ABA in rheumatoid arthritis. Using a propensity score approach, we compared the risk of diverticulitis or GIP in these patients.

RESULTS

With inverse probability weighting, there was an increased risk of diverticulitis in TCZ treated patients compared with RTX or ABA treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]=3.1 [95% confidence interval 1.5-6.3], p= 0.002). Moreover, patients treated with TCZ had also an increased risk of GIP due to diverticulitis compared with those treated with RTX or ABA (HR = 3.8 [1.1-13.6], p= 0.04), resulting in an overall increased risk of GIP (HR = 2.9 [1.1-7.8], p= 0.03), while no significant increased risk of GIP due to any other aetiology was found in TCZ treated patients. Diverticulitis and GIP occurred earlier with TCZ than other drugs after the last perfusion (p= 0.01), with atypical clinical presentation (slow transit in 30%, p= 0.04) and lower acute-phase reactants at the time of the event (p= 0.005).

CONCLUSION

TCZ for rheumatoid arthritis was associated with increased odds of diverticulitis as well as GIP due to diverticulitis as compared with RTX and ABA. Our study confirms the increased odds of GIP in patients receiving TCZ, which might be explained by an increased risk of diverticulitis with misleading clinical presentation.

Current favourable 10-year outcome of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the ESPOIR cohort

OBJECTIVE

To report the 10-year outcome of an inception cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the ESPOIR cohort, and predictors of outcome.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2005, 813 patients were included if they had early arthritis (< 6 months) with a high probability of RA and had never been prescribed DMARDs. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 521 (64.1%) RA patients were followed up for 10 years; 35 (4.3%) died which appears similar to the French general population. Overall, 480 (92.1%) patients received a DMARD; 174 (33.4%) received at least one biologic DMARD, 13.6% within 2 years. At year 10, 273 (52.4%) patients were in DAS28 remission, 40.1% in sustained remission, 14.1% in drug-free remission, 39.7% in CDAI remission. Half of the patients achieved a HAQ-DI < 0.5. SF-36 physical component and pain were well controlled. Structural progression was weak, with a mean change from baseline in modified Sharp score of 11.0 ± 17.9. Only 34 (6.5%) patients required major joint surgery. A substantial number of patients showed new comorbidities over 10 years. Positivity for ACPA was confirmed as a robust predictor of long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a very mild 10-year outcome of a large cohort of patients with early RA diagnosed in the early 2000s, which was much better than results for a previous cohort of patients who were recruited in 1993. This current favourable outcome may be related to more intensive care for real-life patients.

Evaluation of the impact of a nurse-led program of patient self-assessment and self-management in axial spondyloarthritis: results of a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (COMEDSPA)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a nurse-led program of self-management and self-assessment of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, controlled, open, 12-month trial (NCT02374749). Participants were consecutive axial spondyloarthritis patients (according to the rheumatologist) and nurses having participated in a 1-day training meeting. The program included self-management: educational video and specific video of graduated, home-based exercises for patients; and self-assessment: video presenting the rationale of tight monitoring of disease activity with composite scores (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease activity Score, ASDAS/Bath Ankyslosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI). The nurse trained patients to collect, calculate and report (monthly) ASDAS/BASDAI. Treatment allocation was by random allocation to this program or a comorbidities assessment (not presented here and considered here as the control group).

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients (250 and 252 in the active and control groups, respectively) were enrolled (age: 46.7 (12.2) years, male gender: 62.7%, disease duration: 13.7 (11.0) years). After the one-year follow-up period, the adherence to the self-assessment program was considered good (i.e. 79% reported scores >6 times). Despite a lack of statistical significance in the primary outcome (e.g. coping) there was a statistically significant difference in favor of this program for the following variables: change in BASDAI, number and duration of the home exercises in the active group, and physical activity (international physical activity score, IPAQ).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests a short-term benefit of a nurse-led program on self-management and self-assessment for disease activity in a young axial spondyloarthritis population in terms of disease activity, exercises and physical activity.

Cut-off value to identify a flare using the Flare Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis (FLARE-RA) questionnaire: analysis of the TOSCA study

OBJECTIVE

The Flare Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis (FLARE-RA) self-administered questionnaire aims to identify patients who had flare in the interval between 2 consultations. This study aimed to establish a threshold for FLARE-RA score to identify RA flare.

METHODS

The Tocilizumab SubCutAneous (TOSCA) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous Tocilizumab (TCZ) to patients with active RA. Disease activity was assessed with the DAS28ESR at baseline and at week 2 (W2), W4, W12, and W24. The FLARE-RA questionnaire was administered at W12 and W24. Patient satisfaction, assessed at baseline and W24 with the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), was used as a surrogate marker of no flare. A correlation was sought between the FLARE-RA score at W12 and W24 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for monthly DAS28ESR. The optimal FLARE-RA cut-off below which patient satisfaction reached the PASS was explored with an ROC curve.

RESULTS

139 patients were included (mean age 57.3 ± 13.8 years, 74.1% women, mean RA duration 10.8 ± 9.2 years, mean DAS28ESR 5.8 ± 1.1). The correlation between the FLARE-RA score and DAS28ESR AUC was moderate at all times: rho = 0.41 at W12 (p<0.0001) and 0.51 at W24 (p<0.0001). The optimal cut-off for the FLARE-RA score to identify absence of flare (i.e. an acceptable situation based on the PASS) was 2.3 with an AUC of 0.81.

CONCLUSION

FLARE-RA and DAS28ESR assessment differ; we propose a FLARE-RA cut-off of 2.3, below which the situation (i.e. without flare) is acceptable for patients.

Automatic phenotyping of electronical health record: PheVis algorithm

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) often lack reliable annotation of patient medical conditions. Phenorm, an automated unsupervised algorithm to identify patient medical conditions from EHR data, has been developed. PheVis extends PheNorm at the visit resolution. PheVis combines diagnosis codes together with medical concepts extracted from medical notes, incorporating past history in a machine learning approach to provide an interpretable parametric predictor of the occurrence probability for a given medical condition at each visit. PheVis is applied to two real-world use-cases using the datawarehouse of the University Hospital of Bordeaux: i) rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic condition; ii) tuberculosis, an acute condition. Cross-validated AUROC were respectively 0.943 [0.940; 0.945] and 0.987 [0.983; 0.990]. Cross-validated AUPRC were respectively 0.754 [0.744; 0.763] and 0.299 [0.198; 0.403]. PheVis performs well for chronic conditions, though absence of exclusion of past medical history by natural language processing tools limits its performance in French for acute conditions. It achieves significantly better performance than state-of-the-art unsupervised methods especially for chronic diseases.

Real-world Risk of Relapse of Giant Cell Arteritis Treated With Tocilizumab: A Retrospective Analysis of 43 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist, is approved for giant cell arteritis (GCA) as a cortisone-sparing strategy and in refractory patients. This study assessed the real-world efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of patients with GCA treated with TCZ.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study at 3 French centers. All patients aged ≥ 50 years who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and had received at least 1 dose of TCZ were included. Relapse was defined by therapeutic escalation, such as increased doses of corticosteroids (CS), resumption of CS after weaning, or introduction or intensification of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2019, 43 patients were included. Patients were followed up for a median 511 days between GCA diagnosis and inclusion, with 34/43 (79%) patients experiencing relapses. At inclusion, median age was 77 years, and median dose of CS was 15 mg/day. After inclusion, the mean cumulative dose of CS was 2.1 g/year vs 9.4 g/year before inclusion (P < 2 × 10^-7), with 12/43 (28%) patients experiencing relapses on TCZ. Among 29 patients undergoing TCZ discontinuation, 18 (62%) experienced relapses. Factors associated with relapse after inclusion were introduction of TCZ > 6 months after diagnosis (P = 0.005), absence of ischemic signs at diagnosis (P = 0.006), relapse rate > 0.8/year (P = 0.03), and absence of CS tapering ≤ 5 mg/day (P = 0.03) before inclusion. Serious adverse events occurred in 18/43 patients (42%), including 4 deaths.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the effectiveness of TCZ for CS sparing, but after discontinuation of treatment, TCZ allows for a prolonged remission in < 50% of patients. Attention must be paid to the tolerance of this long-term treatment in this elderly, heavily treated refractory population.

Methotrexate and rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease

QUESTION ADDRESSED BY THE STUDY

Methotrexate (MTX) is a key anchor drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of RA. Whether MTX exposure increases the risk of ILD in patients with RA is disputed. We aimed to evaluate the association of prior MTX use with development of RA-ILD.

METHODS

Through a case-control study design with discovery and international replication samples, we examined the association of MTX exposure with ILD in 410 patients with chronic fibrotic ILD associated with RA (RA-ILD) and 673 patients with RA without ILD. Estimates were pooled over the different samples using meta-analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Analysis of the discovery sample revealed an inverse relationship between MTX exposure and RA-ILD (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.022), which was confirmed in the replication samples (pooled adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p=0.009). The combined estimate using both the derivation and validation samples revealed an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.0006). MTX ever-users were less frequent among patients with RA-ILD compared to those without ILD, irrespective of chest high-resolution computed tomography pattern. In patients with RA-ILD, ILD detection was significantly delayed in MTX ever-users compared to never-users (11.4±10.4 years and 4.0±7.4 years, respectively; p<0.001).

ANSWER TO THE QUESTION

Our results suggest that MTX use is not associated with an increased risk of RA-ILD in patients with RA, and that ILD was detected later in MTX-treated patients.

Role of stress in the development of rheumatoid arthritis: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to assess the stressful life events preceding the onset of symptoms in RA. The secondary objectives were to assess how early RA patients perceive stress and cope with stressors.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed, comparing patients recently diagnosed with RA to age- and gender-matched control subjects recently hospitalized for an unplanned surgical procedure not known to be influenced by stress. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale assessed the cumulative stress induced by stressful life events in the year preceding the onset of symptoms. Coping strategies, stress and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using validated psychological scales.

RESULTS

Seventy-six subjects were included in each group. The mean Social Readjustment Rating Scale score was twice as high in cases compared with controls [respectively, 167.0 (172.5) vs 83.3 (124.4), P < 0.001]. The association between cumulative stress and RA was statistically significant only in women, with a dose-dependent association between stress and RA. While female patients with RA attributed more often the onset of symptoms to a life event than female controls (70.2 vs 24.5%, P < 0.001), no significant difference was found when comparing male RA patients with male controls (26.9 vs 18.5%, respectively, P = 0.46). Increased perceived stress score (P = 0.04) and coping based on emotions (P = 0.001) were found in cases compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients with early RA reported more life events in the year preceding the onset of symptoms than controls. Gender specificities were found with a significant association between cumulative stress and RA only in women.

Systemic sclerosis overlap and non-overlap syndromes share clinical characteristics but differ in prognosis and treatments

OBJECTIVES

To screen for concomitant autoimmune disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (overlap SSc) and to describe their clinical characteristics and prognosis.

METHODS

This was a two-center retrospective observational study. Patients diagnosed with SSc according to the 2013 ACR-EULAR scleroderma classification criteria were screened for concomitant rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren syndrome (SgS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patient characteristics were retrieved from the medical records and were compared to those of a non-overlap SSc cohort.

RESULTS

Among the 534 SSc patients studied, thirty-four (6.4%) were identified as having overlap SSc. There were 21 (3.9%) patients with RA, 14 (2.6%) with SgS and 4 (0.7%) with SLE (5 patients had 2 AISD) . The disease phenotype of overlap SSc was similar to that of non-overlap SSc in terms of cutaneous phenotype, prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension, interstitial lung disease, digital ulcers and mortality. Using a multivariate Cox model, age (HR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.02-1.07]), the modified Rodnan skin score (HR = 1.08 per point, 95% CI [1.05-1.11]), and the presence of concomitant SgS (HR = 3.79, 95% CI [1.38-10.40]) were significantly associated with mortality. Overlap SSc were more likely to receive corticosteroids (85.3% vs. 45%, p < 0.001), immunosuppressive drugs (82.4% vs. 49.2%, p < 0.001) and biologics (52.9% vs. 3.8%, p < ZZ0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While overlap and non-overlap SSc shared common characteristics, patients with SgS/SSc had a higher risk of mortality, and those with RA/SSc received more corticosteroids, methotrexate and biologics. Screening for an associated AISD should be promoted since their co-occurrence with SSc may affect prognosis and treatments.

GlutenSpA trial: protocol for a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of the impact of a gluten-free diet on quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Subclinical intestinal inflammation and gut dysbiosis have been reported in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). In common practice, rheumatologists are increasingly confronted with patients with inflammatory rheumatism who are on gluten-free diets (GFDs), despite the lack of reliable data from controlled studies. This study aims to determine the impact of a GFD on the quality of life of patients with axial SpA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The GlutenSpA study is a 24-week, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Patients with axial SpA (n=200) will follow a 16-week GFD and be randomly assigned (1:1) to an experimental or control arm. In the experimental arm with receive at least 6 gluten-free breads per day + 200 g of gluten-free penne pasta per week + 6 rice flavour capsules per day. The control arm will receive at least 6 gluten-containing breads per day + 200 g of gluten-containing penne pasta per week + 6 vital gluten-containing capsules per day. The primary end-point is the variation in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society-Health Index (ASAS-HI) questionnaire between week 16 and baseline. A second open-label period of 8 weeks will follow the intervention period, during which the patient will be free to decide whether they will follow the GFD. The secondary outcomes comprise several patient-reported outcomes (SpA activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index)), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), functional disability index (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index)), variations in body mass index and Homeostasis Model Assessment Index and variations in the abundance and type of bacterial species found in the gut microbiota for a subgroup of patients (n=40). The data will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle.The regional ethics committee (CPP Nord-ouest IV) has approved the study (IDRCB 2018-A00309-46). The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The authors have no relationship that may have influenced the submitted work.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04274374.

A simplified radiographic score effectively predicts radiographic progression of early arthritis in a large nationwide French cohort

OBJECTIVE

Evaluating radiographic progression is a key component of the follow-up of patients with RA. Existing scores are ill-suited to everyday clinical practice. The objective here was to validate a new simplified radiographic score (SRS) for evaluating radiographic progression in patients with early arthritis.

METHODS

Patients with arthritis of <6 months' duration were included in the large, prospective, nationwide, French ESPOIR cohort. Radiographs of the hands and feet were obtained at inclusion then 1 and 5 years later. The modified Sharp scores and SRS were determined by blinded readers. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability of each score, as well as agreement between the two scores, were assessed by computing the intraclass correlation coefficients. The rates of progression over the first year and the next 4 years were determined.

RESULTS

The 506 patients with complete data for the first 5 years were included. At inclusion, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the two scores was good for erosions (0.715, P < 0.001), joint space narrowing (0.892, P < 0.001) and the total score (0.896, P < 0.001). Agreement between the two scores was also good for radiographic progression after 1 year (0.781, P < 0.001). The SRS had good positive and negative predictive values for slow and for rapid progression. SRS determination was less time consuming.

CONCLUSION

The SRS is effective for monitoring radiographic progression in early arthritis and is easier to use and less time-consuming than the Sharp score. The usefulness of the SRS in clinical practice deserves further evaluation.

SAT0115 COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT WAS FREQUENT IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS STARTING A BIOLOGIC, WITH SIMILAR RATES OF INHIBITION OR OVERSTIMULATION: AN ANALYSIS OF 84 PATIENTS FROM THE SARIPRO STUDY

Background:

While cognitive impairment is an issue for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there are few data available on its frequency and possible link with other outcomes in RA.

Objectives:

To assess cognitive impairment in RA and its association with RA and patients’ characteristics.

Methods:

The SariPRO study (NCT 03449758) was a French multicenter study assessing the effects of sarilumab 200 mg on patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderately to severely active RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs. This report focuses on baseline data.

The main outcome of this analysis was cognitive impairment evaluated by the cognitive sub-score of the patient-reported multidimensional assessment of mood disorders (MAThyS) scale. This sub-score is scored between 0 (i.e. feeling that thoughts occur slower) and 40 (i.e. racing thoughts) where 20 is the best state. This sub-score was analyzed by tertiles where the lowest tertile indicates general inhibition, the second tertile includes normal states, and the highest tertile indicates general excitation. In addition to the MAThyS total score and sub-scores (Cognition, Emotion, Psychomotricity, Motivation and Sense perception), age, gender, duration of RA, methotrexate use, antibody status (rheumatoid factor/ACPA positivity), fatigue (FACIT-F), anxiety /depression (HADS), as well as patient global assessment (PGA) were collected. Cognitive impairment was defined as inhibition (first tertile) and excitation (third tertile). The association between cognitive inhibition and patients’ characteristics (demographic, psychological and disease activity) was estimated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression in an exploratory analysis. There was no imputation of missing data.

Results:

In all 84 patients were included, characteristics at baseline were as expected for an RA population initiating a biologic: mean (SD) age: 59.1 (12.3) years, 75.0% female, disease duration 10.0 (10.3) years, rheumatoid factor positivity 76.1%, ACPA positivity 81.3%, and DAS28 5.0 (1.1). The mean (SD) MAThyS cognition score was 18.2 (4.9). In the exploratory multivariate analysis, factors associated to cognitive inhibition were depression (HADS depression score ≥ 8, odds ratio, OR=3.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.16; 8.59], p=0. 025), emotion inhibition (lower tertile of the MATHYS emotion regulation: OR=4.76 [1.54; 14.28]; p=0.007) and low motivation (lower tertile of motivation: OR=4.17 [1.54; 11.11]; p=0.005).

Conclusion:

Cognitive impairment was frequent in this population of patients with active RA, with similar rates of cognitive inhibition and cognitive excitation. The results suggest that there may be an association between cognitive inhibition, depression, emotion dysregulation and absence of motivation. Unexpectedly, this exploratory analysis did not show an association between cognition impairment and demographic characteristics or disease activity.

References:

[1]Study was sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme

Disclosure of Interests:

Hubert MAROTTE Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Sqibb, Lilly France, MSD, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, SanofiAventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Sqibb, Lilly France, MSD, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, SanofiAventis, Paid instructor for: Sanofi-Aventis, Speakers bureau: Sanofi-Aventis, Florence E Lévy-Weil Employee of: Sanofi Genzyme employee, René-Marc Flipo Consultant of: Johnson and Johnson, MSD France, Novartis, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Johnson and Johnson, MSD France, Novartis, Sanofi, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Eric Fakra Consultant of: Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sanofi, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB

OP0022 RISK OF DIVERTICULITIS AND GASTRO-INTESTINAL PERFORATION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH TOCILIZUMAB COMPARED TO RITUXIMAB AND ABATACEPT: A PROSPECTIVE PROPENSITY-MATCHED COHORT STUDY

Background:

There are discordant results regarding a potential increased risk of gastro-intestinal perforation (GIP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) compared to conventional synthetic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or TNF inhibitors (TNFis) (1–3).

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to compare the risk of diverticulitis and GIP in RA patients treated with TCZ compared to rituximab (RTX) and abatacept (ABA).

Methods:

We conducted a multicentric study of patients with RA, prospectively followed in 3 observational French registries evaluating the effectiveness and safety of RTX (Autoimmunity and Rituximab (AIR)), ABA (Orencia and Rheumatoid Arthritis (ORA)), and TCZ (REGistry–RoAcTEmra (REGATE)). Using a propensity score approach, we compared the risk of diverticulitis or GIP during treatment with TCZ vs RTX and ABA. The following covariates were included in the propensity score: age, sex, history of diabetes and neoplasia, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of previous csDMARDs and TNFi, history of TNFi, daily dose of glucocorticoids (GCs) at baseline, co-treatment with a csDMARDs, average DAS28 during follow-up, duration of RA, and exposure time to the considered bDMARDs.

Results:

4501 patients (1496 treated by TCZ, 1986 by RTX and 1019 by ABA) were included. 21 and 9 GIP occurred in the TCZ treated patients, compared to 10 and 8 in the RTX treated patients and 10 and 2 in the ABA treated patients (corresponding incidence rate (IR) are shown in table 1). Two deaths occurred in patients experiencing GIP: 1 (12.5%) due to undetermined rectal perforation among a RTX treated patient, and 1 (11.1%) due to a perforated ulcer among a TCZ treated patient. Based on inverse probability weighting (IPW), there was an increased risk of diverticulitis and GIP in the TCZ treated patients compared with RTX or ABA (table 1). In a subgroup analysis, we confirmed an increased risk of GIP due to diverticulitis but not to any other etiology. Older age (p=0.05), GCs at baseline (p=0.10) and average daily dose of GCs during follow-up (p=0.08) seemed associated with GIP only in univariate analysis. Compared to RTX and ABA, diverticulitis and GIP among TCZ patients occurred earlier after the last perfusion (p=0.01), with atypical clinical presentation (slow transit in 30%, p=0.04) and lower acute phase reactants when the event occurred (C-reactive protein: 31.2±58.4 vs 88.2±89.6 mg/L, p=0.005). Perforated diverticulitis seemed to have higher dose of GCs at the time of the event compared to diverticulitis without perforation in univariate analysis (p=0.06).

Table 1.

Incidence (/1000 PY) and risk of diverticulitis or GIP

AE (n)IRAE (n)IRAE (n)IRIPW analysisOR[95 CI]pOR[95 CI]pExposition (PY)TCZ (ref)3 990RTX6 322ABA2 389TCZ vs RTXTCZ vs ABADiverticulitis215.3101.6104.24.5[2.6-7.6]<0.00013.4[1.7-6.5]<0.0001GIP92.381.320.82.8[1.5-5.1]0.0015.4[1.4-19.9]0.01*Diverticular GIP61.530.520.83.8[1.7-8.5]0,0016.9[1.9-25.4]0.004*Due to another etiology30.750.8001.4[0.5-3.9]0.5--

AE=adverse events; PY=person-years

Conclusion:

TCZ was associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis, and GIP due to diverticulitis, compared to RTX and ABA. Our study confirms an increased risk of GIP in RA patients treated with TCZ, which might be explained by an increased risk of diverticulitis with misleading clinical presentation.

References:

[1]Strangfeld A et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul 12

[2]Xie F, Yun H et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 May 1

[3]Barbulescu A et al. OP0231, Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun 1;77(Suppl 2):164–5.

Disclosure of Interests:

Claire Rempenault: None declared, Cédric Lukas: None declared, Bernard Combe Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: AbbVie; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Eli Lilly and Company; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; UCB, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Daniel Wendling: None declared, Thao Pham Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: BMS, Gilead, Medimmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, UCB, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Consultant of: BMS, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Co., Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Jacques Morel: None declared

Outcomes and Findings of the International Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) BIODAM Cohort for Validation of Soluble Biomarkers in RA

OBJECTIVE

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Soluble Biomarker Working Group initiated an international, multicenter, prospective study, the Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) BIODAM cohort, to generate resources for the clinical validation of candidate biomarkers predictive of radiographic progression. This first report describes the cohort, clinical outcomes, and radiographic findings.

METHODS

Patients with RA from 38 sites in 10 countries starting or changing conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or starting tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were followed for 2 years. Participating physicians were required to adhere to a treat-to-target strategy. Biosamples (serum, urine) were acquired every 3 months, radiography of hands and feet every 6 months, and ultrasound of hands and feet every 3 months in a subset. Primary endpoint was radiographic progression by the Sharp/van der Heijde score.

RESULTS

A total of 571 patients were recruited and 439 (76.9%) completed 2-year followup. At baseline, the majority was female (76%), mean age 55.7 years, and mean disease duration 6.5 years. Patients had a mean of 8.4 swollen and 13.6 tender joints, 44-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS44) 3.8, 77.7% rheumatoid factor-positive or anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive. Percentage of patients in DAS and American College of Rheumatology remission at 2 years was 52.2% and 27.1%, respectively. Percentage of patients with radiographic progression (> 0.5) at 1 and 2 years was 38.2% and 59.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The RA BIODAM prospective study succeeded in generating an extensive list of clinical, imaging (2343 radiographs), and biosample (4638 sera) resources that will be made available to expedite the identification and validation of biomarkers for radiographic damage endpoints. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01476956, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01476956).

SAT0540 ONE-YEAR OUTCOMES AFTER RHEUMATIC IMMUNE-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS FROM CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS

Background:

Description and initial management of rheumatic immune-related adverse-events (irAEs) from cancer immunotherapies have been reported by several groups but to date, few studies have evaluated the long-term outcomes and management of rheumatic irAEs (1).

Objectives:

To describe the long-term management and assess the one-year outcomes of patients who experienced rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Methods:

This was a single-centre prospective observational study including patients referred for musculoskeletal symptoms while treated with ICI. After baseline rheumatological evaluation defining the clinical entity presented, follow-up visits were organised according to the type and severity of irAE. At one year, persistence of irAE, ongoing treatment, as well as cancer outcomes were assessed.

Results:

63 patients were included between September 2015 and June 2018. 24 patients (38%) presented with non-inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions managed with short-term symptomatic treatment and did not require specific follow-up. 39 patients (62%) experienced inflammatory manifestations, mimicking either rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=19), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR, n=16), psoriatic arthritis (PsA, n=3) and one flare of a preexisting axial spondyloarthritis. Overall, 32 patients (82%) received systemic glucocorticoids, with a median rheumatic dosage of 15mg/day (range: 5-60mg/day). None of the patients had to permanently discontinue ICI therapy for rheumatic irAE. 20 patients (67%) were still receiving glucocorticoids at one year, with a median dosage of 5mg/day (range: 2-20mg/day). Glucocorticoids were more frequently discontinued for patients with RA-like condition (44%) than PMR-like condition (23%), but no other predictive factor of glucocorticoids withdrawal could be identified. At one year, overall survival and progression-free survival were comparable between patients who were still receiving glucocorticoids for rheumatic irAE and patients who have discontinued. Eight patients required csDMARDs.

Conclusion:

At one year, a majority of patients required long-term low-dose glucocorticoids for chronic rheumatic irAE, which seems not altering oncological control.

References:

[1]Braaten TJ, Brahmer JR, Forde PM, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis persists after immunotherapy cessation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep 20.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

FRI0095 SARILUMAB IMPROVED PATIENT-PERCEIVED IMPACT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS WHATEVER THE BASELINE DISEASE ACTIVITY: FIRST RESULTS FROM AN INTERVENTIONAL NON CONTROLLED STUDY: SARIPRO, IN MODERATE AND SEVERE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background:

Sarilumab, an anti-IL-6R antibody, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe RA and shown efficacy on disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Detailed analyses of drug efficacy from the patient point of view is important. SariPRO is a pragmatic interventional study close to the daily practice.

Objectives:

To assess the effectiveness of sarilumab on several PROs using the RAID (Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease) score.

Methods:

The SariPRO study (NCT 03449758) was a French multicenter interventional study assessing the effects of sarilumab 200 mg on PROs in patients with moderately to severely active RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs. The primary endpoint was change in total RAID score from baseline to week 24 (RAID ranges 0-10 where 10 is maximal impact). Changes from baseline for RAID, DAS28-ESR and CDAI according to baseline disease activity were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AE). All statistical analyses were descriptive, 95% CI was given when appropriate.

Results:

84 patients were included in 31 centers and 62 were evaluable and analyzed for effectiveness. They had similar characteristics to the 84 patients at baseline and were as expected for an RA population initiating a biologic: mean (SD) age: 59.9 (12.4) years, 71.0% female, disease duration 9.7 (10.3) years, rheumatoid factor positivity 82.5%, ACPA positivity 86.4%, and DAS28=4.9 (11). Total RAID score decreased significantly from 5.7 (2.0) at baseline to 3.3 (2.5) at W24; mean change was -2.4 [95% CI: -3.0; -1.8]. Furthermore, this improvement was noted both for highly and less active patients at baseline: for patients with DAS28-ESR < 5.1 (n=31), mean change was -1.56 [-2.28; -0.83] and for patients with DAS28-ESR≥5.1 (n=27), mean change was -1.98 [-2.91; -1.05]. Changes in DAS28-ESR and CDAI were significant (-2.8 [-3.2; -2.4] and -15.2 [-18.5; -11.8], respectively). AEs were consistent with the safety profile of anti-IL-6R antibodies and with results from RCTs (data not shown).

Conclusion:

In this real world study, treatment with sarilumab during 24 weeks in RA patients led to an improvement in the total RAID score irrespective of baseline levels of disease activity. This is the first time RAID score is used as the primary endpoint in a study.

References:

[1]Study was sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme

Disclosure of Interests:

Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, René-Marc Flipo Consultant of: Johnson and Johnson, MSD France, Novartis, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Johnson and Johnson, MSD France, Novartis, Sanofi, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Christine Albert: None declared, Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, marie-Christophe Boissier: None declared, Cyrille Confavreux: None declared, Gregoire CORMIER: None declared, Emmanuelle Dernis Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Elisabeth Gervais Solau: None declared, Sophie Godot: None declared, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Consultant of: BMS, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Co., Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Philippe Goupille Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Slim Lassoued: None declared, Thierry Lequerre: None declared, Frederic Lioté Consultant of: CME: Nordic Pharma, Christian Marcelli: None declared, Yves Maugars: None declared, Minh Nguyen: None declared, Aleth Perdriger: None declared, Yves-Marie Pers: None declared, Edouard Pertuiset: None declared, Lucile Poiroux: None declared, Carole Rosenberg: None declared, Christian Roux: None declared, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Martin SOUBRIER: None declared, Pascale Vergne-Salle: None declared, Charles Zarnitsky: None declared, Eric Fakra Consultant of: Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sanofi, Hubert MAROTTE Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Sqibb, Lilly France, MSD, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, SanofiAventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Sqibb, Lilly France, MSD, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, SanofiAventis, Paid instructor for: Sanofi-Aventis, Speakers bureau: Sanofi-Aventis, Florence E Lévy-Weil Employee of: Sanofi Genzyme employee

AB0661 CO-MEDICATIONS MAY ALTER THE RESPONSE TO TNF-INHIBITORS IN SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS: A PHARMACOMICROBIOMIC EFFECT?

Background:

The reason why some spondyloarthritis (SA) patients fail to respond to TNF inhibitors (TNF-i) remains unclear. Recently, it has been shown in cancer immunotherapy that the therapeutic response may be strongly altered by co-medication with drugs interfering with the gut microbiota, such as antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), psychotropic or antidiabetic drugs.

Objectives:

Considering the potential role of the gut microbiota in the pathophysiology of SA as in the therapeutic response, the aim was to study the influence of co-medications known to interfere with the microbiota with the therapeutic response to TNF-i in SA patients.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients treated in our department with a first TNF-i from 2009 to 2018. Data collected were demographic information, HLA-B27 status, disease characteristics… Patients were classified as responder (R) or non-responder (NR) according to the BASDAI (< 40/100) value at M6 or to the clinician judgment (when BASDAI was not available). Regarding co-medications, we collected all drugs known to interfere with the gut microbiota that were administered 1 month before and during the first 3 months of the TNF-i treatment. We only considered drugs given to more than 5% of patients. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as percentages. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between co-medications and TNF-i. All analyses were computed on STATA 13.1 software with a statistically significant threshold of 0.05.

Results:

We included 188 patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis (n=89) or peripheral SA (n=99). They were 68 women and 120 men, mean aged 46.6 ± 13; 53% were B27 positive. TNF-i were infliximab (19%), etanercept (44%), adalimumab (34%) golimumab (2%), certolizumab (1%), combined with MTX in 51 patients. 135 patients (72%) were R and 53 (28%) NR. In univariate analysis, 59.1% of patients who received NSAIDs were R, compared to 88.2% of patients not treated with NSAIDs (p< 0.0001); 42.2% of patients receiving PPIs were R compared to 86.3% of patients PPI free (p< 0.0001); 55.8% of patients who were given antibiotics were R, compared to 75.7% of patients who did not (p=0,02); 27.8% of patients treated with psychotropic drugs were R, compared to 75.9% of patients not receiving such treatment (p< 0.0001) (Figure 1). Differences were not statistically significant for corticosteroids, MTX, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins. Although 91% of patients taken PPIs were also given NSAIDs, NSAIDs, PPIs and antibiotics intake were considered as independent factors associated with TNF-i failure in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion:

Co-medication with NSAIDs, PPIs, antibiotics and psychotropic drugs were significantly associated with a decreased chance to respond to TNF-i. The hypothesis that this effect is due to their interference with the gut microbiota is only speculative but, regardless the reason of this interaction, clinician should be aware of the potential negative effect of these co-medication on TNF-i.

Figure 1.

Disclosure of Interests:

Maéva Masson: None declared, Marie Kostine: None declared, Thomas Barnetche: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Christophe Richez Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB., Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared

THU0364 SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS OVERLAP AND NON-OVERLAP SYNDROMES SHARE SIMILAR CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS BUT DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT TREATMENT

Background:

Overlap between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and another auto-immune systemic disease (AISD) in the same patient seems to be more frequent than each disease’s prevalence would explain.

Objectives:

Our aim was to investigate for overlap syndrome from 2 French cohorts of SSc patients and to compare their characteristics with non-overlap SSc.

Methods:

Our study was retrospective observational and bicentric. Patients responding to the 2013 ACR-EULAR scleroderma classification criteria for SSc were screened for concomitant AISD. Patients satisfying 2010 ACR-EULAR diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and/or 2016 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome (SgS) and/or 2012 SLICC systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria were included in our study. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were retrospectively retrieved from medical records and were compared to a SSc cohort.

Results:

A population of 534 SSc patients was studied. Thirty-four (6.4%) patients were identified as having overlap syndrome. There was 21 (3.9%) patients with RA, 14 (2.6%) with GSS and 4 (0.7%) with SLE (5 patients had 2 AISD). Diagnosis of RA, SLE or SgS was made after diagnosis of SSc for 22 (65%) patients, concomitantly for 10 patients (29%), and before for 2 (6%) patients. Interestingly, two patients with SSc/RA overlap were tested ACPA-positive 2 and 5 years before the first arthritis, respectively. Patients with SSc/RA were severe with 81% of them having erosive disease and despite treatment, only 48% (10/21) patients achieved RA remission (DAS28-CRP < 2.6) at the time of their last visit. Disease duration was longer in patients with SSc overlap syndrome compared to non-overlap patients (15.5 ± 10.6 yearsvs.9.5 ± 8, p < 0.001). Proportion of limited cutaneous SSc was similar in overlap and non-overlap groups (70.6%vs.75.5%, respectively, p = NS), as was the positivity for anti-centromeres antibodies (50%vs.43.2%, respectively, p = NS). The disease phenotype of SSc overlap syndrome was similar to the one of non-overlap SSc in terms of prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension, interstitial lung disease, digital ulcer and mortality. With respect to treatments, patients with overlap were more likely to receive glucocorticoids (85.3%vs.45%, p < 0.001), immunosuppressive drugs (82.4%vs.49.2%, p < 0.001) and biologic DMARD (bDMARD, 52.9 %vs.3.8%, p < 0.001). The most prescribed bDMARDs in the overlap population was tocilizumab (40.6%), TNF-alpha inhibitor (29.4%) and rituximab (26.5%) (p < 0.001 for all comparisonvs.non-overlap SSc).

Conclusion:

We found a prevalence of overlap syndrome higher than 5% among SSc patients. While SSc overlap and non-overlap share common characteristics, overlap patients are more likely to receive glucocorticoids and biologics such as anti-TNF. These overlap should be searched actively (eg, screening for ACPA) since some treatment used for other autoimmune diseases such as glucocorticoids or TNF-alpha inhibitor may be harmful in SSc.

Disclosure of Interests:

Marc SCHERLINGER Consultant of: Amgen, Mylan, Fresenius Kabi, Johanna Lutz: None declared, Jean Sibilia: None declared, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Consultant of: BMS, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Co., Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Christophe Richez Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB., Emmanuel Chatelus: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared

Managing patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: The French Society of Rheumatology answers to most frequently asked questions up to May 2020

BACKGROUND

Rheumatologists must contend with COVID-19 pandemic in the management of their patients and many questions have been raised on the use of both anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). The French Society of Rheumatology (SFR) selected the most critical ones to the daily practice of a rheumatologist and a group of 10 experts from SFR and Club Rheumatism and Inflammation (CRI) boards proposed responses based on the current knowledge of May 2020.

METHODS

Following the availability of the first 18 questions and statements, 1400 individuals consulted the frequently asked questions between the March 31, 2020 and April 12, 2020. As a result, 16 additional questions were forwarded to the SFR, and answered by the board. An additional round of review by email and video conference was organized, which included updates of the previous statements. The scientific relevance of 5 of the questions led to their inclusion in this document. Each response received a final assessment on a scale of 0-10 with 0 meaning no agreement whatsoever and 10 being in complete agreement. The mean values of these votes for each question are presented as the levels of agreement (LoA) at the end of each response. This document was last updated on April 17, 2020.

RESULTS

Based on current scientific literature already published, in most circumstances, there is no contraindication to the initiation or continuation of anti-inflammatory drugs as well as DMARDs. If signs suggestive of infection (coronavirus or other) occur, treatments should be discontinued and resumed, if necessary, after 2 weeks without any symptoms. Only, some signals suggest that people taking an immunosuppressive dose of corticosteroid therapy are at greater risk of developing severe COVID-19. Intra-articular injections of glucocorticoids are allowed when there is no reasonable therapeutic alternative, and providing that precautions to protect the patient and the practitioner from viral contamination are adopted, included appropriate information to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available data on managing patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic are reassuring and support continuing or initiating symptomatic as well as specific treatments of these diseases, the main target of their management remaining their appropriate control, even during this pandemic.

Evaluation of the impact of a nurse-led program of systematic screening of comorbidities in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: The results of the COMEDSPA prospective, controlled, one year randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a nurse-led program of systematic screening for the management (detection/prevention) of comorbidities.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, controlled, open, 12-month trial (NCT02374749).

PARTICIPANTS

consecutive patients with axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) (according to the rheumatologist) THE PROGRAM: A nurse collected data on comorbidities during a specific outpatient visit. In the event of non-agreement with recommendations, the patient was informed and a specific recommendation was given to the patient (orally and in a with a detailed written report). Patients were seen after one year in a nurse-led visit. TREATMENT ALLOCATION: random allocation (i.e. either this program or an educational program not presented here and considered here as the control group).

MAIN OUTCOME

change after one year of a weighted comorbidity management score (0 to 100 where 0= optimal management).

RESULTS

502 patients were included (252 and 250 in the active and control groups, respectively): age: 47±12 years, male gender: 63%, disease duration: 14±11y. After one year, no differences were observed in a weighted comorbidity management score. However, the number of patients in agreement with recommendations was significantly higher in the active group for vaccinations (flu vaccination: 28.6% vs. 9.9%, p<0.01; pneumococcal vaccination:40.0% vs. 21.1%,p=0.04), for cancer screening (skin cancer screening: 36.3% vs. 17.2%, p=0.04) and for osteoporosis (bone densitometry performed: 22.6% vs. 8.7%, p<0.01; Vitamin D supplementation initiation: 51.9% vs. 9.4%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests the short-term benefit of a single-visit nurse-led program for systematic screening of comorbidities for its management in agreement with recommendations, even in this young population of patients with axSpA.

EULAR points to consider for the diagnosis and management of rheumatic immune-related adverse events due to cancer immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are observed in about 10% of patients with cancer receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Given the recent emergence of these events and the lack of guidance for rheumatologists addressing them, a European League Against Rheumatism task force was convened to harmonise expert opinion regarding their identification and management.

Methods

First, the group formulated research questions for a systematic literature review. Then, based on literature and using a consensus procedure, 4 overarching principles and 10 points to consider were developed.

Results

The overarching principles defined the role of rheumatologists in the management of irAEs, highlighting the shared decision-making process between patients, oncologists and rheumatologists. The points to consider inform rheumatologists on the wide spectrum of musculoskeletal irAEs, not fulfilling usual classification criteria of rheumatic diseases, and their differential diagnoses. Early referral and facilitated access to rheumatologist are recommended, to document the target organ inflammation. Regarding therapeutic, three treatment escalations were defined: (1) local/systemic glucocorticoids if symptoms are not controlled by symptomatic treatment, then tapered to the lowest efficient dose, (2) conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in case of inadequate response to glucocorticoids or for steroid sparing and (3) biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, for severe or refractory irAEs. A warning has been made on severe myositis, a life-threatening situation, requiring high dose of glucocorticoids and close monitoring. For patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease, baseline immunosuppressive regimen should be kept at the lowest efficient dose before starting immunotherapies.

Conclusion

These statements provide guidance on diagnosis and management of rheumatic irAEs and aim to support future international collaborations.