1
|
Ramiro S, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Sepriano A, FitzGerald O, Østergaard M, Homik J, Elkayam O, Thorne JC, Larché MJ, Ferraccioli G, Backhaus M, Boire G, Combe B, Schaeverbeke T, Saraux A, Dougados M, Rossini M, Govoni M, Sinigaglia L, Cantagrel AG, Allaart CF, Barnabe C, Bingham CO, van Schaardenburg D, Hammer HB, Dadashova R, Hutchings E, Paschke J, Maksymowych WP. Stricter treat-to-target in RA does not result in less radiographic progression: a longitudinal analysis in RA BIODAM. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:2989-2997. [PMID: 36645243 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy. METHODS Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval. CONCLUSIONS In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Oliver FitzGerald
- Conway Institute for Biomolecular Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joanne Homik
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ori Elkayam
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the "Sackler" Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - J Carter Thorne
- The Arthritis Program Research Group, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maggie J Larché
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Divisions of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Marina Backhaus
- Park-Klinik Weissensee, Academic Hospital of the Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gilles Boire
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS), University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Bernard Combe
- Department of Rheumatology, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Thierry Schaeverbeke
- Department of Rheumatology, FHU ACRONIM, University Hospital of Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Saraux
- LBAI, U1227, Université Brest, Inserm, CHU Brest, Brest, France
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Rheumatology Department, Paris Cité University, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maurizio Rossini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marcello Govoni
- Rheumatology Unit, S. Anna Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Luigi Sinigaglia
- Department of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alain G Cantagrel
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU Toulouse, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Hilde B Hammer
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramiro S, Landewé RB, van der Heijde D, Sepriano A, FitzGerald O, Ostergaard M, Homik J, Elkayam O, Thorne JC, Larche M, Ferraccioli G, Backhaus M, Boire G, Combe B, Schaeverbeke T, Saraux A, Dougados M, Rossini M, Govoni M, Sinigaglia L, Cantagrel AG, Allaart CF, Barnabe C, Bingham CO, Tak PP, van Schaardenburg D, Hammer HB, Dadashova R, Hutchings E, Paschke J, Maksymowych WP. Is treat-to-target really working in rheumatoid arthritis? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients treated in daily practice (RA BIODAM). Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:453-459. [PMID: 32094157 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice leads to more patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) meeting the remission target. METHODS RA patients from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA BIODAM (BIOmarkers of joint DAMage) cohort). Per visit was decided whether a patient was treated according to a T2T-strategy with 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) remission (DAS44 <1.6) as the target. Sustained T2T was defined as T2T followed in ≥2 consecutive visits. The main outcome was the achievement of DAS44 remission at the subsequent 3-month visit. Other outcomes were remission according to 28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean definitions. The association between T2T and remission was tested in generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS In total 4356 visits of 571 patients (mean (SD) age: 56 (13) years, 78% female) were included. Appropriate application of T2T was found in 59% of the visits. T2T (vs no T2T) did not yield a higher likelihood of DAS44 remission 3 months later (OR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.92 to 1.16)), but sustained T2T resulted in an increased likelihood of achieving DAS44 remission (OR: 1.19 (1.03 to 1.39)). Similar results were seen with DAS28-ESR remission. For more stringent definitions (CDAI, SDAI and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission), T2T was consistently positively associated with remission (OR range: 1.16 to 1.29), and sustained T2T had a more pronounced effect on remission (OR range: 1.49 to 1.52). CONCLUSION In daily clinical practice, the correct application of a T2T-strategy (especially sustained T2T) in patients with RA leads to higher rates of remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Bm Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oliver FitzGerald
- St Vincent's University Hospital and Conway Institute for Biomolecular Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joanne Homik
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ori Elkayam
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the "Sackler" Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - J Carter Thorne
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Larche
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Divisions of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunolgoy and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Marina Backhaus
- Park-Klinik Weissensee, Academic Hospital of the Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gilles Boire
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS), Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Combe
- CHU Montpellier and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Thierry Schaeverbeke
- Department of Rheumatology, FHU ACRONIM, University Hospital of Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Maxime Dougados
- Rheumatology Department, Paris Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maurizio Rossini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marcello Govoni
- Rheumatology Unit, S. Anna Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Luigi Sinigaglia
- Department of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alain G Cantagrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Paul P Tak
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel Paschke
- CaRE Arthritis LTD, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|