1
|
Port H, Christiansen F, Nielsen SH, Frederiksen P, Bay-Jensen AC, Karsdal MA, Seven S, Sørensen IJ, Loft AG, Madsen OR, Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ. Identification of patient endotypes and adalimumab treatment responders in axial spondyloarthritis using blood-derived extracellular matrix biomarkers. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003769. [PMID: 38199849 PMCID: PMC10806480 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the potential of a panel of ECM remodelling markers as endotyping tools for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) by separating patients into subtypes and investigate how they differ among each other in disease activity scores and response to treatment with adalimumab. METHODS In three axSpA studies, a panel of 14 blood-based ECM biomarkers related to formation of collagen (PRO-C2, PRO-C3, PRO-C6), degradation of collagen by metalloproteinases (C1M, C2M, T2CM, C3M, C4M, C6M, C10C), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-degraded prolargin (PROM), MMP-degraded and citrullinated vimentin (VICM), basement membrane turnover (PRO-C4) and neutrophil activity (CPa9-HNE) were assessed to enable patient clustering (endotyping). MASH (n=41) was a cross-sectional study, while Adalimumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis study (ASIM,n=45) and Danish Multicenter Study of Adalimumab in Spondyloarthritis (DANISH, n=49) were randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trials of adalimumab versus placebo every other week for 6 or 12 weeks, respectively, followed by active treatment. Biomarker data were log-transformed, standardised by mean centering and scaled by the SD prior to principal component analysis and K-means clustering. RESULTS Based on all three studies, we identified two orthogonal dimensions reflecting: (1) inflammation and neutrophil activity (driven by C1M and CPa9-HNE) and (2) collagen turnover (driven by PRO-C2). Three endotypes were identified: high inflammation endotype (Endotype1), low inflammation endotype (Endotype 2) and high collagen turnover endotype (Endotype3). Endotype1 showed higher disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)) at baseline compared with Endotype2 and Endotype3 and higher percentage of patients responding to adalimumab based on ASDAS clinical improvement at week 24. Endotype3 showed higher percentage of patients with 50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index response at week 24 compared with Endotype2. CONCLUSION These endotypes differ in their tissue remodelling profile and may in the future have utility for patient stratification and treatment tailoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Port
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sengul Seven
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte and Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Inge Juul Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology and Spine diseases, Righospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ole Rintek Madsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte and Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology and Spine diseases, Righospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte and Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology and Spine diseases, Righospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne J Pedersen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte and Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology and Spine diseases, Righospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terslev L, Ostergaard M, Georgiadis S, Brahe CH, Ellegaard K, Dohn UM, Fana V, Møller T, Juul L, Huynh TK, Krabbe S, Ornbjerg LM, Glinatsi D, Røgind H, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Jacobsen S, Jensen DV, Manilo N, Asmussen K, Boesen M, Rastiemadabadi Z, Morsel-Carlsen L, Møller JM, Krogh NS, Hetland ML. Flare during tapering of biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care: characteristics and predictors. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002796. [PMID: 36549857 PMCID: PMC9791469 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of flare in a 2-year follow-up study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained clinical remission tapering towards withdrawal of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS Sustained clinical remission was defined as Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP) ≤2.6 without radiographic progression for >1 year. bDMARDs were tapered according to a mandatory clinical guideline to two-thirds of standard dose at baseline, half of dose at week 16 and discontinuation at week 32. Prospective assessments for 2 years included clinical evaluation, conventional radiography, ultrasound and MRI for signs of inflammation and bone changes. Flare was defined as DAS28-CRP ≥2.6 with ∆DAS28-CRP ≥1.2 from baseline. Baseline predictors of flare were assessed by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of 142 included patients, 121 (85%) flared during follow-up of which 86% regained remission within 24 weeks after flare. Patients that flared were more often rheumatoid factor positive, had tried more bDMARDs and had higher baseline ultrasound synovitis sum scores than those not flaring. For patients on standard dose, predictors of flare within 16 weeks after reduction to two-thirds of standard dose were baseline MRI-osteitis (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33; p=0.014), gender (female) (OR 6.71; 95% CI 1.68 to 46.12; p=0.005) and disease duration (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11; p=0.020). Baseline predictors for flare within 2 years were ultrasound grey scale synovitis sum score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.44; p=0.020) and number of previous bDMARDs (OR 4.07; 95% CI 1.35 to 24.72; p=0.007). CONCLUSION The majority of real-world patients with RA tapering bDMARDs flared during tapering, with the majority regaining remission after stepwise dose increase. Demographic and imaging parameters (MR-osteitis/ultrasound greyscale synovitis) were independent predictors of immediate flare and flare overall and may be of importance for clinical decision-making in patients eligible for tapering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Karen Ellegaard
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg og Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - UM Dohn
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Viktoria Fana
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Torsten Møller
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lars Juul
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Tuan Khai Huynh
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Holte Rheumatology Clinic, Capital Region, Holte, Denmark
| | - Simon Krabbe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - L M Ornbjerg
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Rheumatology, Skaraborg Hospital Skövde, Skovde, Sweden
| | - Henrik Røgind
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Annette Hansen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte V Jensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Danbio Registry, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Karsten Asmussen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lone Morsel-Carlsen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Terslev L, Ostergaard M. Rheumatoid Arthritis Relapse and Remission - Advancing Our Predictive Capability Using Modern Imaging. J Inflamm Res 2021; 14:2547-2555. [PMID: 34163211 PMCID: PMC8215903 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s284405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical remission has become an achievable target for the majority of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but subclinical inflammation as assessed by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to be frequent in patients in clinical remission. Subclinical synovitis has been shown to be linked to both subsequent structural damage progression and a risk of flare, demonstrating that subclinical synovitis represents incomplete suppression of inflammation and questions whether it is appropriate only to use clinical composite scores as treatment target in clinical practice. Maintaining a state of remission has proven important as sustained clinical remission impacts long-term outcome regarding joint damage progression, physical function and quality of life. Treating subclinical inflammation has been attempted and has led to more frequent strict clinical remission and better physical function, but also to more adverse events. Thus, an overall benefit of incorporating imaging goals in treat-to-target strategies has not been documented. However, in patients in clinical remission on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, both ultrasound and MRI may aid in the clinical decision regarding whether drug tapering or even discontinuation should be attempted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Terslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ohrndorf S, Glimm AM, Ammitzbøll-Danielsen M, Ostergaard M, Burmester GR. Fluorescence optical imaging: ready for prime time? RMD Open 2021; 7:e001497. [PMID: 34088778 PMCID: PMC8183208 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The novel technique of fluorescence optical imaging (FOI, Xiralite), which is approved in the European Union and the USA for clinical use, has been the object of studies since 2009. Indocyanine green-based FOI can demonstrate an impaired microcirculation caused by inflammation in both hands in one examination. Several studies have investigated FOI for detection of joint inflammation by comparing FOI to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The results have shown a generally good agreement (>80%) between FOI and clinical examination, MRI and MSUS by power Doppler in inflammatory joint diseases. Moreover, characteristic enhancements in skin and nails are seen in PsA, which potentially can be useful in the diagnostic process of early undifferentiated arthritis. Furthermore, FOI has been investigated for the visualisation of a disturbed microcirculation in the hands and fingers of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), highlighting the potential of monitoring vascular changes in SSc and other vasculopathies. The available data indicate that it is time to consider FOI as a useful part of the imaging repertoire in rheumatology clinical practice, particularly where MSUS and MRI are not easily available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ohrndorf
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne-Marie Glimm
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mads Ammitzbøll-Danielsen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG, Baraliakos X, Weber U, Machado P, Pedersen SJ, Hooge MD, Sieper J, Wichuk S, Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Eshed I, Ostergaard M. Data-driven definitions for active and structural MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint in spondyloarthritis and their predictive utility. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:4778-4789. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To determine quantitative SI joint MRI lesion cut-offs that optimally define a positive MRI for inflammatory and structural lesions typical of axial SpA (axSpA) and that predict clinical diagnosis.
Methods
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) MRI group assessed MRIs from the ASAS Classification Cohort in two reading exercises where (A) 169 cases and 7 central readers; (B) 107 cases and 8 central readers. We calculated sensitivity/specificity for the number of SI joint quadrants or slices with bone marrow oedema (BME), erosion, fat lesion, where a majority of central readers had high confidence there was a definite active or structural lesion. Cut-offs with ≥95% specificity were analysed for their predictive utility for follow-up rheumatologist diagnosis of axSpA by calculating positive/negative predictive values (PPVs/NPVs) and selecting cut-offs with PPV ≥ 95%.
Results
Active or structural lesions typical of axSpA on MRI had PPVs ≥ 95% for clinical diagnosis of axSpA. Cut-offs that best reflected a definite active lesion typical of axSpA were either ≥4 SI joint quadrants with BME at any location or at the same location in ≥3 consecutive slices. For definite structural lesion, the optimal cut-offs were any one of ≥3 SI joint quadrants with erosion or ≥5 with fat lesions, erosion at the same location for ≥2 consecutive slices, fat lesions at the same location for ≥3 consecutive slices, or presence of a deep (i.e. >1 cm depth) fat lesion.
Conclusion
We propose cut-offs for definite active and structural lesions typical of axSpA that have high PPVs for a long-term clinical diagnosis of axSpA for application in disease classification and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert G Lambert
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Medical Imaging Consultants, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Ulrich Weber
- Department of Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pedro M Machado
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
- Centre for Rheumatology and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susanne J Pedersen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manouk de Hooge
- VIB Inflammation Research Center, Ghent University
- Rheumatology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joachim Sieper
- Department of Rheumatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin and German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin
| | | | - Denis Poddubnyy
- Department of Rheumatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin and German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin
| | - Martin Rudwaleit
- Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld
- Department of Rheumatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Robert Landewe
- Department of Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
- Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Eshed
- Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Engel S, Terslev L, Pfeiffer Jensen M, Hendricks O, Ostergaard M, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Møller Sørensen C, Krogh NS, Agerbo J, Ziegler C, Hetland M. Self-protection strategies and health behaviour in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: results and predictors in more than 12 000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases followed in the Danish DANBIO registry. RMD Open 2021; 7:e001505. [PMID: 33402443 PMCID: PMC7786545 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS In Danish patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases to explore self-protection strategies and health behaviour including adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment (DMARD) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and again after the reopening of the society started. Furthermore, to identify characteristics of patients with high levels of anxiety and self-isolation. METHODS Patients in routine care followed prospectively in the nationwide DANBIO registry were invited to answer an online questionnaire regarding disease activity and COVID-19 infection, behaviour in March and June 2020. Responses were linked to patient data in DANBIO. Characteristics potentially associated with anxiety, self-isolation and medication adherence (gender/age/diagnosis/education/work status/comorbidity/DMARD/smoking/EQ-5D/disease activity) were explored with multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS We included 12 789 patients (8168 rheumatoid arthritis/2068 psoriatic arthritis/1758 axial spondyloarthritis/795 other) of whom 65% were women and 36% treated with biological DMARD. Self-reported COVID-19 prevalence was 0.3%. Patients reported that they were worried to get COVID-19 infection (March/June: 70%/45%) and self-isolated more than others of the same age (48%/38%). The fraction of patients who changed medication due to fear of COVID-19 were 4.1%/0.6%. Female gender, comorbidities, not working, lower education, biological treatment and poor European Quality of life, 5 dimensions were associated with both anxiety and self-isolation. CONCLUSION In >12 000 patients with inflammatory arthritis, we found widespread anxiety and self-isolation, but high medication adherence, in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. This persisted during the gradual opening of society during the following months. Attention to patients' anxiety and self-isolation is important during this and potential future epidemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Sara Engel
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Syddanmark, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- Department of Rheumatology, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Malene Kildemand
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | | | - René Drage Østgård
- Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jette Agerbo
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Connie Ziegler
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kvien TK, Balsa A, Betteridge N, Buch MH, Durez P, Favalli EG, Favier G, Gabay C, Geenen R, Gouni-Berthold I, van den Hoogen F, Kent A, Klareskog L, Ostergaard M, Pavelka K, Polido Pereira J, Semb AG, Sköld M, Dougados M. Considerations for improving quality of care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and associated comorbidities. RMD Open 2020; 6:e001211. [PMID: 32683326 PMCID: PMC7722279 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 0.5-1%. Patients with RA are at an increased risk of developing comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes and depression). Despite this, there are limited recommendations for the management and implementation of associated comorbidities. This study aimed to identify good practice interventions in the care of RA and associated comorbidities. METHODS A combination of primary research (180+ interviews with specialists across 12 European rheumatology centres) and secondary research (literature review of existing publications and guidelines/recommendations) were used to identify challenges in management and corresponding good practice interventions. Findings were prioritised and reviewed by a group of 18 rheumatology experts including rheumatologists, comorbidity experts, a patient representative and a highly specialised nurse. RESULTS Challenges throughout the patient pathway (including delays in diagnosis and referral, shortage of rheumatologists, limited awareness of primary care professionals) and 18 good practice interventions were identified in the study. The expert group segmented and prioritised interventions according to three distinct stages of the disease: (1) suspected RA, (2) recent diagnosis of RA and (3) established RA. Examples of good practice interventions included enabling self-management (self-monitoring and disease management support, for example, lifestyle adaptations); early arthritis clinic; rapid access to care (online referral, triage, ultrasound-guided diagnosis); dedicated comorbidity specialists; enhanced communication with primary care (hotline, education sessions); and integrating patient registries into daily clinical practice. CONCLUSION Learning from implementation of good practice interventions in centres across Europe provides an opportunity to more widely improved care for patients with RA and associated comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tore K Kvien
- Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Patrick Durez
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Guillaume Favier
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Global Strategy Group, KPMG LLP, London, UK
| | - Cem Gabay
- Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Frank van den Hoogen
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alison Kent
- Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK
| | | | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Karel Pavelka
- Rheumatologic Clinic, Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Magnus Sköld
- Respiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine Solna and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Hôpital Cochin, Rheumatology, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maksymowych WP, Pedersen SJ, Weber U, Baraliakos X, Machado PM, Eshed I, de Hooge M, Sieper J, Wichuk S, Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé RBM, Poddubnyy D, Ostergaard M, Lambert RGW. Central reader evaluation of MRI scans of the sacroiliac joints from the ASAS classification cohort: discrepancies with local readers and impact on the performance of the ASAS criteria. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:935-942. [PMID: 32371388 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) MRI working group conducted a multireader exercise on MRI scans from the ASAS classification cohort to assess the spectrum and evolution of lesions in the sacroiliac joint and impact of discrepancies with local readers on numbers of patients classified as axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS Seven readers assessed baseline scans from 278 cases and 8 readers assessed baseline and follow-up scans from 107 cases. Agreement for detection of MRI lesions between central and local readers was assessed descriptively and by the kappa statistic. We calculated the number of patients classified as axSpA by the ASAS criteria after replacing local detection of active lesions by central readers and replacing local reader radiographic sacroiliitis by central reader structural lesions on MRI. RESULTS Structural lesions, especially erosions, were as frequent as active lesions (≈40%), the majority of patients having both types of lesions. The ASAS definitions for active MRI lesion typical of axSpA and erosion were comparatively discriminatory between axSpA and non-axSpA. Local reader overcall for active MRI lesions was about 30% but this had a minor impact on the number of patients (6.4%) classified as axSpA. Substitution of radiography with MRI structural lesions also had little impact on classification status (1.4%). CONCLUSION Despite substantial discrepancy between central and local readers in interpretation of both types of MRI lesion, this had a minor impact on the numbers of patients classified as axSpA supporting the robustness of the ASAS criteria for differences in assessment of imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter P Maksymowych
- Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Susanne Juhl Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Ulrich Weber
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark.,Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Pedro M Machado
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK.,Rheumatology, University College London Centre for Rheumatology, London, UK
| | - Iris Eshed
- Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Manouk de Hooge
- VIB Center of Inflammation Research, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joachim Sieper
- Medical Department I, Rheumatology, University Clinic Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Wichuk
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Martin Rudwaleit
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bielefeld Rosenhöhe, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Désirée van der Heijde
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Norway
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Denis Poddubnyy
- Department of Rheumatology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Robert G W Lambert
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging and Medical Imaging Consultants, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramiro S, Landewé RB, van der Heijde D, Sepriano A, FitzGerald O, Ostergaard M, Homik J, Elkayam O, Thorne JC, Larche M, Ferraccioli G, Backhaus M, Boire G, Combe B, Schaeverbeke T, Saraux A, Dougados M, Rossini M, Govoni M, Sinigaglia L, Cantagrel AG, Allaart CF, Barnabe C, Bingham CO, Tak PP, van Schaardenburg D, Hammer HB, Dadashova R, Hutchings E, Paschke J, Maksymowych WP. Is treat-to-target really working in rheumatoid arthritis? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients treated in daily practice (RA BIODAM). Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:453-459. [PMID: 32094157 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice leads to more patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) meeting the remission target. METHODS RA patients from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA BIODAM (BIOmarkers of joint DAMage) cohort). Per visit was decided whether a patient was treated according to a T2T-strategy with 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) remission (DAS44 <1.6) as the target. Sustained T2T was defined as T2T followed in ≥2 consecutive visits. The main outcome was the achievement of DAS44 remission at the subsequent 3-month visit. Other outcomes were remission according to 28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean definitions. The association between T2T and remission was tested in generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS In total 4356 visits of 571 patients (mean (SD) age: 56 (13) years, 78% female) were included. Appropriate application of T2T was found in 59% of the visits. T2T (vs no T2T) did not yield a higher likelihood of DAS44 remission 3 months later (OR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.92 to 1.16)), but sustained T2T resulted in an increased likelihood of achieving DAS44 remission (OR: 1.19 (1.03 to 1.39)). Similar results were seen with DAS28-ESR remission. For more stringent definitions (CDAI, SDAI and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission), T2T was consistently positively associated with remission (OR range: 1.16 to 1.29), and sustained T2T had a more pronounced effect on remission (OR range: 1.49 to 1.52). CONCLUSION In daily clinical practice, the correct application of a T2T-strategy (especially sustained T2T) in patients with RA leads to higher rates of remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Bm Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oliver FitzGerald
- St Vincent's University Hospital and Conway Institute for Biomolecular Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joanne Homik
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ori Elkayam
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the "Sackler" Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - J Carter Thorne
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Larche
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Divisions of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunolgoy and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Marina Backhaus
- Park-Klinik Weissensee, Academic Hospital of the Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gilles Boire
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS), Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Combe
- CHU Montpellier and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Thierry Schaeverbeke
- Department of Rheumatology, FHU ACRONIM, University Hospital of Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Maxime Dougados
- Rheumatology Department, Paris Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maurizio Rossini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marcello Govoni
- Rheumatology Unit, S. Anna Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Luigi Sinigaglia
- Department of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alain G Cantagrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Paul P Tak
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel Paschke
- CaRE Arthritis LTD, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mandl P, Ciechomska A, Terslev L, Baraliakos X, Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, van der Laken CJ, Ostergaard M, Naredo E. Implementation and role of modern musculoskeletal imaging in rheumatological practice in member countries of EULAR. RMD Open 2019; 5:e000950. [PMID: 31321076 PMCID: PMC6606074 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To document the current training, implementation and role of modern musculoskeletal imaging techniques: ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography, among rheumatologists in the member countries of the EULAR. Methods English-language questionnaires for each imaging modality developed by a EULAR task force were sent out to national and international scientific societies as well as imaging experts in the given modalities involved in research and/or training. The surveys were distributed via an online survey tool (SurveyMonkey). Simple descriptive and summary statistics were calculated from the responses. Results More than 90% of ultrasound (US) experts reported the availability of a US unit in their department. Suspicion of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritides were the main clinical indications for performing US for diagnostic purposes. Suspicion of sacroiliitis and degenerative spine disease were the most common indications to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for diagnostic purposes, while positron emission tomography was mainly performed to diagnose large vessel vasculitis and to investigate fever of unknown origin. The reported percentage of rheumatologists performing US was highly variable, ranging from more than 80% in 6% of countries to less than 10% in 15% of countries. The majority of experts (77%) reported that their national rheumatology societies organise musculoskeletal US courses, while courses in MRI or CT organised by the national rheumatology societies were less commonly reported (29% and 8%, respectively). Conclusions Rheumatologists in Europe utilise modern imaging techniques; however, access to the techniques and training offered is varied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Mandl
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Ciechomska
- Department of Rheumatology, Wishaw General Hospital, Wishaw, UK
| | - L Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Xenofon Baraliakos
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Sankt Josefs-Krankenhaus, Herne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.,Rheumatology Department, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - P G Conaghan
- Rheumatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Maria Antonietta D'Agostino
- Rheumatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Annamaria Iagnocco
- Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Rome, Italy
| | - Conny J van der Laken
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - E Naredo
- Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz and Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baraliakos X, Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Maksymowych W, Naredo E, Ostergaard M, Schett G, Emery P. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and osteoarthritis: An international viewpoint on the current knowledge and future research priorities. Eur J Rheumatol 2019; 6:38-47. [PMID: 30451654 PMCID: PMC6459329 DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.18121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging is increasingly used in the routine management of rheumatic diseases as well as in the clinical trials of these disorders. This viewpoint, authored by a group of international imaging experts following two meetings dedicated to imaging in rheumatology, reports a consensus about the current knowledge and addresses where further research should be focused based on the views of the international imaging experts and discussion of the evidence with attending imaging practitioners. The goal was to maximize the potential of imaging to improve the clinical management of four rheumatic diseases. These rheumatic diseases include rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philip G Conaghan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino
- Department of Rheumatology, APHP, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,INSERM U1173, Laboratoire d'Excellence INFLAMEX, UFR Simone Veil, Versailles-Saint-Quentin University, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France
| | - Walter Maksymowych
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta School of Medicine and Dentistry, Alberta, Canada
| | - Esperanza Naredo
- Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universities Fundación Jiménez Díaz and Autonomy University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ammitzbøll-Danielsen M, Glinatsi D, Torp-Pedersen S, Møller JM, Naredo E, Ostergaard M, Terslev L. Tenosynovitis Evaluation Using Image Fusion and B-Flow - A Pilot Study on New Imaging Techniques in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38:285-293. [PMID: 28511227 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to compare the assessment of tenosynovitis by ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the image fusion technique and to investigate whether US B-flow imaging (BFI) is an alternative to Doppler US when assessing tenosynovitis. Materials and Methods 15 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had US-verified tenosynovitis in the wrist/hand. An MRI was performed of the wrist/hand with subsequent repeated US and image fusion. Images were compared in three steps: 1. Visual image comparison, 2. Quantitative measurement of transverse areas of the affected tendon and tendon sheath, using two tendon measures on MRI, area 1 and area 2, excluding and including partial volume artifacts, respectively, 3. Assessment using the OMERACT semi-quantitative scoring systems for US and MRI. Furthermore, BFI was assessed as: 0: No flow, 1: Focal flow, 2: Multifocal flow, 3: Diffuse flow, in the tendon sheath. Results The median areas on US and MRI (areas 1 and 2) were 0.16 cm2 (25;75 pctl: 0.10; 0.25), 0.9 cm2 (0.06; 0.18) and 0.13 cm2 (0.10; 0.25), respectively, for included tendons and 0.18 cm2 (0.13; 0.26), 0.27 cm2 (0.20; 0.45) and 0.23 cm2 (0.16; 0.40) for tendon sheaths. No statistically significant difference was found between US tendon area and MRI tendon area 2 (Wilcoxon's test; p = 0.47). Overall, the agreement between grayscale and color Doppler (CD) US and MRI tenosynovitis visualization and scoring was good, but not between CD and BFI. Conclusion US and MRI have high agreement using image fusion for the assessment of tenosynovitis when partial volume artifacts are taken into account. BFI is not an alternative to CD for the measurement of slow flow in tenosynovitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Ammitzbøll-Danielsen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Jacob M Møller
- Department of Radiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Esperanza Naredo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baker JF, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Baker DG, Ostergaard M. Relationship of patient-reported outcomes with MRI measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 76:486-490. [PMID: 27432355 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PurposeWe assessed whether MRI measures of synovitis, osteitis and bone erosion were associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a longitudinal clinical trial setting among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis longitudinal cohort of 291 patients with RA was derived from the MRI substudy of the GO-BEFORE randomised controlled trial of golimumab among methotrexate-naïve patients. Correlations between RAMRIS scores (synovitis, osteitis, bone erosion) and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)), pain and global patient scores were determined at 0, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. Correlations between interval changes were also assessed. Multivariable regression models using robust generalised estimating equations evaluated associations over all time-points and their relationship to other clinical disease activity measures.ResultsGreater synovitis, osteitis and bone erosion scores were positively associated with HAQ at all time-points (all p<0.05) and with pain and patient global scores at 24 and 52 weeks. Over all visits, synovitis was associated with HAQ, pain and patient global scores (p≤0.03) independent of clinical disease activity measures. Improvements in synovitis and bone erosion were also associated with improvements in PROs. Less improvement in synovitis and progression in MRI erosion at 52 weeks were both independently associated with worsening in all PROs at 52 weeks while progression on X-ray was not associated. Similar associations were observed across treatment groups.ConclusionsMRI measures of inflammation and structural damage correlate independently with physical function, pain and patient global assessments. These observations support the validity of MRI biomarkers.Trial registration numberNCT00264537; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua F Baker
- Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Philip G Conaghan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel G Baker
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compán MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Östör A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:3-15. [PMID: 25969430 PMCID: PMC4717393 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 941] [Impact Index Per Article: 117.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reaching the therapeutic target of remission or low-disease activity has improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly. The treat-to-target recommendations, formulated in 2010, have provided a basis for implementation of a strategic approach towards this therapeutic goal in routine clinical practice, but these recommendations need to be re-evaluated for appropriateness and practicability in the light of new insights. OBJECTIVE To update the 2010 treat-to-target recommendations based on systematic literature reviews (SLR) and expert opinion. METHODS A task force of rheumatologists, patients and a nurse specialist assessed the SLR results and evaluated the individual items of the 2010 recommendations accordingly, reformulating many of the items. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted upon by >40 experts, including 5 patients, from various regions of the world. Levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. RESULTS The update resulted in 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. The previous recommendations were partly adapted and their order changed as deemed appropriate in terms of importance in the view of the experts. The SLR had now provided also data for the effectiveness of targeting low-disease activity or remission in established rather than only early disease. The role of comorbidities, including their potential to preclude treatment intensification, was highlighted more strongly than before. The treatment aim was again defined as remission with low-disease activity being an alternative goal especially in patients with long-standing disease. Regular follow-up (every 1-3 months during active disease) with according therapeutic adaptations to reach the desired state was recommended. Follow-up examinations ought to employ composite measures of disease activity that include joint counts. Additional items provide further details for particular aspects of the disease, especially comorbidity and shared decision-making with the patient. Levels of evidence had increased for many items compared with the 2010 recommendations, and levels of agreement were very high for most of the individual recommendations (≥9/10). CONCLUSIONS The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ferdinand C Breedveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Free University and Humboldt University, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, USA
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology B, Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital,Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Monika Schoels
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Stoffer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jose Louis Andreu
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Martin Aringer
- Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bergman
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neil Betteridge
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald Burkhardt
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt, German
| | - Mario Cardiel
- Centro de Investigación Clínica de Morelia, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Bernard Combe
- Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Montpellier University, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Durez
- Pôle de Recherche en Rhumatologie, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joao Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Department, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alan Gibofsky
- Weill Medical College, Cornell University Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Juan J Gomez-Reino
- Rheumatology Unit, Santiago University Clinical Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Pekka Hannonen
- Department of Medicine, Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | | | - Marios Kouloumas
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Landewe
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Nash
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet and Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrew Östör
- Rheumatology Clinical Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pam Richards
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Carter Thorne
- Division of Rheumatology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newarket, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Martinus de Wit
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Desirée van der Heijde
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Troum OM, Pimienta OL, Schmidt WA, Ostergaard M, D'Agostino MA, Gaylis N, Arnold W, Ben-Artzi A, Ranganath V, Seraphine JL, Peterfy C. Proceedings from the 7th Annual International Society for Musculoskeletal Imaging in Rheumatology (ISEMIR) conference. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015; 45:115-21. [PMID: 25908178 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Revised: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The International Society for Musculoskeletal Imaging in Rheumatology (ISEMIR) was founded in 2005 with the goal of discussing matters related to imaging in rheumatology, particularly, validation, education, and use in clinical practice and research. Because the field of musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging is rapidly evolving, continuous education in the field is imperative. ISEMIR's international faculty and world-renowned experts presented the newest information as it relates to the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) at the 7th annual ISEMIR meeting which took place on April 12-14, 2014 in Santa Monica, California. Presentations from the meeting can be viewed at www.isemir.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orrin M Troum
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Olga L Pimienta
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Wolfgang A Schmidt
- Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Medical Centre for Rheumatology Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Hvidovre and Herly, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Norman Gaylis
- Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Specialties, Aventura, FL
| | | | - Ami Ben-Artzi
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Judy L Seraphine
- International Society for Musculoskeletal Imaging in Rheumatology, Suite 301. 342 N. Main St, Suite 301, West Hartford, CT 06117.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baker JF, Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Shults J, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Baker DG, Ostergaard M. Reply: To PMID 24757132. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66:3245-6. [PMID: 25132673 DOI: 10.1002/art.38810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua F Baker
- Philadelphia VA Medical Center, and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Baker JF, Ostergaard M, George M, Shults J, Emery P, Baker DG, Conaghan PG. Greater body mass independently predicts less radiographic progression on X-ray and MRI over 1-2 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73:1923-8. [PMID: 25091439 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Greater body mass index (BMI) has been associated with less radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the association between BMI and joint damage progression as measured by X-ray and MRI. METHODS 1068 subjects with RA from two clinical trials of golimumab (GO-BEFORE and GO-FORWARD) had radiographs performed at weeks 0, 52 and 104 and evaluated using the van der Heijde-Sharp (vdHS) scoring system. Contrast-enhanced MRIs of the dominant wrist and hand were obtained at weeks 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the risk of radiographic progression for each BMI category (<25, 25-30, >30 kg/m(2)). Within GO-BEFORE, piecewise, robust generalised estimating equations marginal models assessed the probability of MRI erosion progression for each BMI category. Multivariable linear regression models assessed baseline associations between BMI and bone oedema (a precursor of bone erosion). RESULTS Higher BMI category was associated with a lower probability of progression in vdHS score at weeks 52 and 104 independent of potential confounders. Higher BMI was also independently associated with a lower probability of progression in MRI erosion score over 2 years. Subjects with greater BMI demonstrated less bone oedema independent of differences in other disease severity measures, including MRI synovitis in the same joints. CONCLUSIONS Greater BMI is associated with a lower risk of progression on X-ray and MRI over 2 years. Subjects with greater BMI also demonstrate less bone oedema at baseline. Greater BMI may indicate a less aggressive RA phenotype and aid in risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua F Baker
- Division of Rheumatology, Philadelphia Veterans' Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael George
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justine Shults
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel G Baker
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Philip G Conaghan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weber U, Lambert R, Pedersen S, Chan S, Zubler V, Rufibach K, Ostergaard M, Zhao Z, Maksymowych W. FRI0147 Data Driven Lesion-Based Criteria for Defining A Positive Sacroiliac Joint MRI in 2 Cohorts with Axial Spondyloarthritis: Table 1. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.3413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
19
|
Keller A, Soerensen I, Ostergaard M, Madsen O, Asmussen K, Møller J, Pedersen S, Kollerup G, Thamsborg G. THU0332 Does Tnfα-Inhibition Influence the Progression of Degenerative Changes in the Lumbar Spine in Patients with Axial Spondylartritis (AX-SPA)? Ann Rheum Dis 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.5214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
20
|
Kirwan JR, Boers M, Hewlett S, Beaton D, Bingham CO, Choy E, Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Dougados M, Furst DE, Guillemin F, Gossec L, van der Heijde DM, Kloppenburg M, Kvien TK, Landewé RBM, Mackie SL, Matteson EL, Mease PJ, Merkel PA, Ostergaard M, Saketkoo LA, Simon L, Singh JA, Strand V, Tugwell P. Updating the OMERACT filter: core areas as a basis for defining core outcome sets. J Rheumatol 2014; 41:994-9. [PMID: 24634204 PMCID: PMC4217644 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter presupposes an explicit framework for identifying the relevant core outcomes that are universal to all studies of the effects of intervention effects. There is no published outline for instrument choice or development that is aimed at measuring outcome, was derived from broad consensus over its underlying philosophy, or includes a structured and documented critique. Therefore, a new proposal for defining core areas of measurement ("Filter 2.0 Core Areas of Measurement") was presented at OMERACT 11 to explore areas of consensus and to consider whether already endorsed core outcome sets fit into this newly proposed framework. METHODS Discussion groups critically reviewed the extent to which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with or negated the proposed framework, whether these observations had a more general application, and what issues remained to be resolved. RESULTS Although there was broad acceptance of the framework in general, several important areas of construction, presentation, and clarity of the framework were questioned. The discussion groups and subsequent feedback highlighted 20 such issues. CONCLUSION These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on accepting the proposed Filter 2.0 framework of Core Areas as the basis for the selection of Core Outcome Domains and hence appropriate Core Outcome Sets for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Kirwan
- From the University of Bristol Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK; Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of the West of England, Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK; Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Section of Rheumatology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; Division of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK; Versailles-Saint Quentin En Yvelines University, Department of Rheumatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt; Paris-Descartes University, Medicine Faculty, APHP, Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology B, Paris, France; University of California, Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA; Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes, Nancy; Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), Paris; AP-HP Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Paris, France; Departments of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Atrium Medical Center Heerlen, the Netherlands; NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Division of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Seattle Rheumatology Associates, Swedish Medical Center Rheumatology Research Division, University of Washington School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wells G, Beaton DE, Tugwell P, Boers M, Kirwan JR, Bingham CO, Boonen A, Brooks P, Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Dougados M, Furst DE, Gossec L, Guillemin F, Helliwell P, Hewlett S, Kvien TK, Landewé RB, March L, Mease PJ, Ostergaard M, Simon L, Singh JA, Strand V, van der Heijde DM. Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility. J Rheumatol 2014; 41:1005-10. [PMID: 24692522 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The "Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. "Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Wells
- From the Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Bristol Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK; Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Australian Health Workforce Institute (AHWI), School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, and UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK; Versailles-Saint Quentin En Yvelines University, Department of Rheumatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt; Paris-Descartes University, Medicine Faculty, APHP, Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology B, Paris, France; Section of Rheumatology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California in Los Angeles; Los Angeles, California, USA; Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) - Paris 6, GRC-UMPC 08 (EEMOIS); AP-HP Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Paris; Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes, Nancy, France; University of Leeds, Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, LIMM Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds West Yorkshire; University of the West of England, Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK; Department of Rh
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
D’Agostino M, Wakefield R, Berner Hammer H, Vittecoq O, Galeazzi M, Balint P, Fillipucci E, Moller I, Iagnocco A, Naredo E, Ostergaard M, Gaillez C, Kerselaers W, van Holder K, Le Bars M. THU0095 Early response to abatacept plus MTX in MTX-IR RA patients using power doppler ultrasonography: An open-label study:. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
23
|
Weber U, Zubler V, Zhao Z, Lambert RG, Chan SM, Pedersen SJ, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych WP. OP0273 Does Spinal MRI Add Incremental Diagnostic Value to MRI of the Sacroiliac Joints Alone in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
24
|
Axelsen MB, Eshed I, Duer-Jensen A, Moller JM, Pedersen SJ, Ostergaard M. Whole-body MRI assessment of disease activity and structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: first step towards an MRI joint count. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014; 53:845-53. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Tan YK, Ostergaard M, Bird P, Conaghan PG. Ultrasound versus high field magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014; 32:S99-S105. [PMID: 24528508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 10/11/2013] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade there have been significant advances in the field of musculoskeletal imaging, especially in the application of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Both modalities offer significant advantages over the previous standards of clinical examination and radiography, and allow direct visualisation of both joint inflammation and structural damage. Although measuring similar pathology, each of these imaging tools has its own benefits and limitations; understanding these will help researchers and clinicians to determine the appropriate role for these tools in RA joint assessment. This review article seeks to compare the usefulness of US and MRI in RA diagnosis, prognosis and outcome assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- York Kiat Tan
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Poggenborg RP, Wiell C, Boyesen P, Boonen A, Bird P, Pedersen SJ, Sorensen IJ, Madsen OR, Slot O, Moller JM, Hasselquist M, Kubassova O, Ostergaard M. No overall damage progression despite persistent inflammation in adalimumab-treated psoriatic arthritis patients: results from an investigator-initiated 48-week comparative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 53:746-56. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
27
|
Jaremko JL, Lambert RGW, Zubler V, Weber U, Loeuille D, Roemer FW, Cibere J, Pianta M, Gracey D, Conaghan P, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych WP. Methodologies for semiquantitative evaluation of hip osteoarthritis by magnetic resonance imaging: approaches based on the whole organ and focused on active lesions. J Rheumatol 2013; 41:359-69. [PMID: 24241486 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As a wider variety of therapeutic options for osteoarthritis (OA) becomes available, there is an increasing need to objectively evaluate disease severity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This is more technically challenging at the hip than at the knee, and as a result, few systematic scoring systems exist. The OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) filter of truth, discrimination, and feasibility can be used to validate image-based scoring systems. Our objective was (1) to review the imaging features relevant to the assessment of severity and progression of hip OA; and (2) to review currently used methods to grade these features in existing hip OA scoring systems. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted. MEDLINE keyword search was performed for features of arthropathy (such as hip + bone marrow edema or lesion, synovitis, cyst, effusion, cartilage, etc.) and scoring system (hip + OA + MRI + score or grade), with a secondary manual search for additional references in the retrieved publications. RESULTS Findings relevant to the severity of hip OA include imaging markers associated with inflammation (bone marrow lesion, synovitis, effusion), structural damage (cartilage loss, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, labral tears), and predisposing geometric factors (hip dysplasia, femoral-acetabular impingement). Two approaches to the semiquantitative assessment of hip OA are represented by Hip OA MRI Scoring System (HOAMS), a comprehensive whole organ assessment of nearly all findings, and the Hip Inflammation MRI Scoring System (HIMRISS), which selectively scores only active lesions (bone marrow lesion, synovitis/effusion). Validation is presently confined to limited assessment of reliability. CONCLUSION Two methods for semiquantitative assessment of hip OA on MRI have been described and validation according to the OMERACT Filter is limited to evaluation of reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob L Jaremko
- From the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Radiology and Department of Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Medicine, CHU de NANCY-Brabois, Vandoeuvre, France; Department of Radiology, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany; Quantitative Imaging Center (QIC), Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Research Scientist, Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; St. Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia; Radiology Department, Craigavon Area Hospital, Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Portadown, Northern Ireland; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Loeppenthin K, Esbensen BA, Ostergaard M, Jennum P, Thomsen T, Midtgaard J. Physical activity maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil 2013; 28:289-99. [DOI: 10.1177/0269215513501526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To describe the experience of physical activity maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Design: A qualitative salutogenic-oriented interview study. Setting: A rheumatology outpatient clinic. Subjects: A purposive sample of 16 physically active patients (mean age 50, range 37–67) diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis on average 21 years previously (range 4–46 years). Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide to illuminate how the phenomenon ‘physical activity maintenance’ was experienced by patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation, inspired by Giorgi’s descriptive phenomenological methodology. Results: The analysis revealed three categories: (1) knowing and enjoying the body; (2) responsibility and challenges; (3) autonomy and social belonging. On the basis of these categories, the essential meaning of the phenomenon of physical activity maintenance for patients with rheumatoid arthritis was summarized into ‘striving for a transparent body and participation’, pointing to experiences of sensations of wellbeing, liberation from restrictions and social participation on equal terms with non-arthritis populations. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis may be understood as a resource to resist disability and to feel and stay healthy while creating and sustaining meaningfulness in life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Loeppenthin
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Science, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
- Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - BA Esbensen
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Science, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
- Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Ostergaard
- Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Jennum
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Danish Centre for Sleep Medicine, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - T Thomsen
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Science, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
- Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - J Midtgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- University Hospitals Centre for Health Care Research, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sivera F, Andrés M, Carmona L, Kydd ASR, Moi J, Seth R, Sriranganathan M, van Durme C, van Echteld I, Vinik O, Wechalekar MD, Aletaha D, Bombardier C, Buchbinder R, Edwards CJ, Landewé RB, Bijlsma JW, Branco JC, Burgos-Vargas R, Catrina AI, Elewaut D, Ferrari AJL, Kiely P, Leeb BF, Montecucco C, Müller-Ladner U, Ostergaard M, Zochling J, Falzon L, van der Heijde DM. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout: integrating systematic literature review and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in the 3e initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 73:328-35. [PMID: 23868909 PMCID: PMC3913257 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to develop evidence-based multinational recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout. Using a formal voting process, a panel of 78 international rheumatologists developed 10 key clinical questions pertinent to the diagnosis and management of gout. Each question was investigated with a systematic literature review. Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and abstracts from 2010-2011 European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology meetings were searched in each review. Relevant studies were independently reviewed by two individuals for data extraction and synthesis and risk of bias assessment. Using this evidence, rheumatologists from 14 countries (Europe, South America and Australasia) developed national recommendations. After rounds of discussion and voting, multinational recommendations were formulated. Each recommendation was graded according to the level of evidence. Agreement and potential impact on clinical practice were assessed. Combining evidence and clinical expertise, 10 recommendations were produced. One recommendation referred to the diagnosis of gout, two referred to cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, six focused on different aspects of the management of gout (including drug treatment and monitoring), and the last recommendation referred to the management of asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. The level of agreement with the recommendations ranged from 8.1 to 9.2 (mean 8.7) on a 1-10 scale, with 10 representing full agreement. Ten recommendations on the diagnosis and management of gout were established. They are evidence-based and supported by a large panel of rheumatologists from 14 countries, enhancing their utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisca Sivera
- Department Reumatologia, Hospital General Universitario de Elda, , Elda, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Glintborg B, Ostergaard M, Krogh NS, Andersen MD, Tarp U, Loft AG, Lindegaard HM, Holland-Fischer M, Nordin H, Jensen DV, Olsen CH, Hetland ML. Clinical response, drug survival, and predictors thereof among 548 patients with psoriatic arthritis who switched tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor therapy: results from the Danish Nationwide DANBIO Registry. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 65:1213-23. [PMID: 23460467 DOI: 10.1002/art.37876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2012] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the frequency of treatment switching and outcomes among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who switched tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNFi) agents in routine care. METHODS We conducted an observational cohort study based on the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20)/ACR50/ACR70, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria for good response, and the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) (remission). Kaplan-Meier and regression analyses were used for drug survival analyses and to identify predictors of outcome after treatment switching. RESULTS Of 1,422 patients starting TNFi agents, 548 patients (39%) switched to a second biologic drug during up to 10 years of followup. Median followup was 2.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.0-4.3 years). Switchers were more frequently women (56% versus 45%), had a shorter disease duration (3 versus 4 years), a higher median Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score (1.1 [IQR 0.6-1.6] versus 0.9 [IQR 0.5-1.4]), DAS28 (4.8 [4.0-5.7] versus 4.4 [3.6-5.2]), pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS) (65 mm [46-77] versus 62 mm [40-75]), and fatigue score on a VAS (69 mm [50-83] versus 64 mm [42-80] mm) (all P < 0.05 at start of first TNFi). During the first and second treatment, HAQ, DAS28, and VAS scores and C-reactive protein levels had decreased after 6 months (all P < 0.05), and median drug survival was 2.2 versus 1.3 years (P < 0.001). Lower fatigue score increased survival of the second TNFi. After switching, the proportions of patients achieving a sustained ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, EULAR good response, and DAS28 remission after 3-6 months were 22% (number needed to treat [NNT] 4.5), 13% (NNT 7.9), 5% (NNT 20), 19% (NNT 5.3), and 34% (NNT 2.9), respectively. Response rates were lower during the second treatment (all P < 0.01 versus first TNFi). At the 2-year visit, 47% of switchers had achieved an ACR20 response. No differences between drug-drug combinations were found. CONCLUSION Thirty-nine percent of the patients with PsA switched TNFi agents. Response rates and drug survival were lower after switching; however, half of the switchers had an ACR20 response 2 years after starting the first TNFi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- Gentofte University Hospital and DANBIO Registry, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Weber U, Rufibach K, Lambert R, Ostergaard M, Chan S, Zubler V, Pedersen S, Maksymowych W. FRI0296 Level of confidence in the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis by expert readers in sacroiliac joint MRI: a new gold standard criterion for defining a positive MRI?:. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
32
|
Weber U, Pedersen S, Zubler V, Rufibach K, Chan S, Lambert R, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych W. OP0239 What constitutes the characteristic fat lesion on MRI of the sacroiliac joints in early spondyloarthritis?:. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
33
|
Weber U, Zubler V, Zhao Z, Lambert RG, Rufibach K, Chan SM, Pedersen SJ, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych WP. SAT0227 Low Diagnostic Utility Of Candidate Definitions for a Positive MRi of the Spine in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
34
|
Weber U, Zhao Z, Zubler V, Chan SM, Lambert RG, Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Maksymowych WP. OP0217 Frequent Detection of Inflammation and Fat Infiltration Suggestive of Spondyloarthritis on MRI of the Entire Spine in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Mechanical Back Pain. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
35
|
Weber U, Zubler V, Pedersen S, Rufibach K, Lambert R, Chan S, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych W. OP0171 A data driven approach to the definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis:. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
36
|
Mehta P, Holder S, Fisher B, Vincent T, Nadesalingam K, Maciver H, Shingler W, Bakshi J, Hassan S, D'Cruz D, Chan A, Litwic AE, McCrae F, Seth R, McCrae F, Nandagudi A, Jury E, Isenberg D, Karjigi U, Paul A, Rees F, O'Dowd E, Kinnear W, Johnson S, Lanyon P, Bakshi J, Stevens R, Narayan N, Marguerie C, Robinson H, Ffolkes L, Worsnop F, Ostlere L, Kiely P, Dharmapalaiah C, Hassan N, Nandagudi A, Bharadwaj A, Skibinska M, Gendi N, Davies EJ, Akil M, Kilding R, Ramachandran Nair J, Walsh M, Farrar W, Thompson RN, Borukhson L, McFadyen C, Singh D, Rajagopal V, Chan AML, Wearn Koh L, Christie JD, Croot L, Gayed M, Disney B, Singhal S, Grindulis K, Reynolds TD, Conway K, Williams D, Quin J, Dean G, Churchill D, Walker-Bone KE, Goff I, Reynolds G, Grove M, Patel P, Lazarus MN, Roncaroli F, Gabriel C, Kinderlerer AR, Nikiphorou E, Hall FC, Bruce E, Gray L, Krutikov M, Wig S, Bruce I, D'Agostino MA, Wakefield R, Berner Hammer H, Vittecoq O, Galeazzi M, Balint P, Filippucci E, Moller I, Iagnocco A, Naredo E, Ostergaard M, Gaillez C, Kerselaers W, Van Holder K, Le Bars M, Stone MA, Williams F, Wolber L, Karppinen J, Maatta J, Thompson B, Atchia I, Lorenzi A, Raftery G, Platt P, Platt PN, Pratt A, Turmezei TD, Treece GM, Gee AH, Poole KE, Chandratre PN, Roddy E, Clarson L, Richardson J, Hider S, Mallen C, Lieberman A, Prouse PJ, Mahendran P, Samarawickrama A, Churchill D, Walker-Bone KE, Ottery FD, Yood R, Wolfson M, Ang A, Riches P, Thomson J, Nuki G, Humphreys J, Verstappen SM, Chipping J, Hyrich K, Marshall T, Symmons DP, Roy M, Kirwan JR, Marshall RW, Matcham F, Scott IC, Rayner L, Hotopf M, Kingsley GH, Scott DL, Steer S, Ma MH, Dahanayake C, Scott IC, Kingsley G, Cope A, Scott DL, Dahanayake C, Ma MH, Scott IC, Kingsley GH, Cope A, Scott DL, Wernham A, Ward L, Carruthers D, Deeming A, Buckley C, Raza K, De Pablo P, Nikiphorou E, Carpenter L, Jayakumar K, Solymossy C, Dixey J, Young A, Singh A, Penn H, Ellerby N, Mattey DL, Packham J, Dawes P, Hider SL, Ng N, Humby F, Bombardieri M, Kelly S, Di Cicco M, Dadoun S, Hands R, Rocher V, Kidd B, Pyne D, Pitzalis C, Poore S, Hutchinson D, Low A, Lunt M, Mercer L, Galloway J, Davies R, Watson K, Dixon W, Symmons D, Hyrich K, Mercer L, Lunt M, Low A, Galloway J, Watson KD, Dixon WG, Symmons D, Hyrich KL, Low A, Lunt M, Mercer L, Bruce E, Dixon W, Hyrich K, Symmons D, Malik SP, Kelly C, Hamilton J, Heycock C, Saravanan V, Rynne M, Harris HE, Tweedie F, Skaparis Y, White M, Scott N, Samson K, Mercieca C, Clarke S, Warner AJ, Humphreys J, Lunt M, Marshall T, Symmons D, Verstappen S, Chan E, Kelly C, Woodhead FA, Nisar M, Arthanari S, Dawson J, Sathi N, Ahmad Y, Koduri G, Young A, Kelly C, Chan E, Ahmad Y, Woodhead FA, Nisar M, Arthanari S, Dawson J, Sathi N, Koduri G, Young A, Cumming J, Stannett P, Hull R, Metsios G, Stavropoulos Kalinoglou A, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJ, Nightingale P, Koutedakis Y, Kitas GD, Nikiphorou E, Dixey J, Williams P, Kiely P, Walsh D, Carpenter L, Young A, Perry E, Kelly C, de-Soyza A, Moullaali T, Eggleton P, Hutchinson D, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJ, Metsios G, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Sandoo A, Kitas GD, de Pablo P, Maggs F, Carruthers D, Faizal A, Pugh M, Jobanputra P, Kehoe O, Cartwright A, Askari A, El Haj A, Middleton J, Aynsley S, Hardy J, Veale D, Fearon U, Wilson G, Muthana M, Fossati G, Healy L, Nesbitt A, Becerra E, Leandro MJ, De La Torre I, Cambridge G, Nelson PN, Roden D, Shaw M, Davari Ejtehadi H, Nevill A, Freimanis G, Hooley P, Bowman S, Alavi A, Axford J, Veitch AM, Tugnet N, Rylance PB, Hawtree S, Muthana M, Aynsley S, Mark Wilkinson J, Wilson AG, Woon Kam N, Filter A, Buckley C, Pitzalis C, Bombardieri M, Croft AP, Naylor A, Zimmermann B, Hardie D, Desanti G, Jaurez M, Muller-Ladner U, Filer A, Neumann E, Buckley C, Movahedi M, Lunt M, Ray DW, Dixon WG, Burmester GR, Matucci-Cerinic M, Navarro-Blasco F, Kary S, Unnebrink K, Kupper H, Mukherjee S, Cornell P, Richards S, Rahmeh F, Thompson PW, Westlake SL, Javaid MK, Batra R, Chana J, Round G, Judge A, Taylor P, Patel S, Cooper C, Ravindran V, Bingham CO, Weinblatt ME, Mendelsohn A, Kim L, Mack M, Lu J, Baker D, Westhovens R, Hewitt J, Han C, Keystone EC, Fleischmann R, Smolen J, Emery P, Genovese M, Doyle M, Hsia EC, Hart JC, Lazarus MN, Kinderlerer AR, Harland D, Gibbons C, Pang H, Huertas C, Diamantopoulos A, Dejonckheere F, Clowse M, Wolf D, Stach C, Kosutic G, Williams S, Terpstra I, Mahadevan U, Smolen J, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Samborski W, Berenbaum F, Davies O, Koetse W, Bennett B, Burkhardt H, Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, Davies O, Luijtens K, van der Heijde D, Mariette X, van Vollenhoven RF, Bykerk V, de Longueville M, Arendt C, Luijtens K, Cush J, Khan A, Maclaren Z, Dubash S, Chalam VC, Sheeran T, Price T, Baskar S, Mulherin D, Molloy C, Keay F, Heritage C, Douglas B, Fleischmann R, Weinblatt ME, Schiff MH, Khanna D, Furst DE, Maldonado MA, Li W, Sasso EH, Emerling D, Cavet G, Ford K, Mackenzie-Green B, Collins D, Price E, Williamson L, Golla J, Vagadia V, Morrison E, Tierney A, Wilson H, Hunter J, Ma MH, Scott DL, Reddy V, Moore S, Ehrenstein M, Benson C, Wray M, Cairns A, Wright G, Pendleton A, McHenry M, Taggart A, Bell A, Bosworth A, Cox M, Johnston G, Shah P, O'Brien A, Jones P, Sargeant I, Bukhari M, Nusslein H, Alten R, Galeazzi M, Lorenz HM, Boumpas D, Nurmohamed MT, Bensen W, Burmester GR, Peter HH, Rainer F, Pavelka K, Chartier M, Poncet C, Rauch C, Le Bars M, Lempp H, Hofmann D, Adu A, Congreve C, Dobson J, Rose D, Simpson C, Wykes T, Cope A, Scott DL, Ibrahim F, Schiff M, Alten R, Weinblatt ME, Nash P, Fleischmann R, Durez P, Kaine J, Delaet I, Kelly S, Maldonado M, Patel S, Genovese M, Jones G, Sebba A, Lepley D, Devenport J, Bernasconi C, Smart D, Mpofu C, Gomez-Reino JJ, Verma I, Kaur J, Syngle A, Krishan P, Vohra K, Kaur L, Garg N, Chhabara M, Gibson K, Woodburn J, Telfer S, Buckley F, Finckh A, Huizinga TW, Dejonckheere F, Jansen JP, Genovese M, Sebba A, Rubbert-Roth A, Scali JJ, Alten R, Kremer JM, Pitts L, Vernon E, van Vollenhoven RF, Sharif MI, Das S, Emery P, Maciver H, Shingler W, Helliwell P, Sokoll K, Vital EM. Case Reports * 1. A Late Presentation of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: Beware of TGF Receptor Mutations in Benign Joint Hypermobility. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
37
|
Smolen JS, Schoels MM, Nishimoto N, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Gabay C, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Jones G, Kvien TK, Murakami M, Betteridge N, Bingham CO, Bykerk V, Choy EH, Combe B, Cutolo M, Graninger W, Lanas A, Martin-Mola E, Montecucco C, Ostergaard M, Pavelka K, Rubbert-Roth A, Sattar N, Scholte-Voshaar M, Tanaka Y, Trauner M, Valentini G, Winthrop KL, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Consensus statement on blocking the effects of interleukin-6 and in particular by interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72:482-92. [PMID: 23172750 PMCID: PMC3595138 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since approval of tocilizumab (TCZ) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway inhibition was evaluated in trials of TCZ and other agents targeting the IL-6 receptor and ligand in various RA populations and other inflammatory diseases. This consensus document informs on interference with the IL-6 pathway based on evidence and expert opinion. METHODS Preparation of this document involved international experts in RA treatment and RA patients. A systematic literature search was performed that focused on TCZ and other IL6-pathway inhibitors in RA and other diseases. Subsequently, incorporating available published evidence and expert opinion, the steering committee and a broader expert committee (both including RA patients) formulated the current consensus statement. RESULTS The consensus statement covers use of TCZ as combination- or monotherapy in various RA populations and includes clinical, functional and structural aspects. The statement also addresses the second approved indication in Europe JIA and non-approved indications. Also early phase trials involving additional agents that target the IL-6 receptor or IL-6 were evaluated. Safety concerns, including haematological, hepatic and metabolic issues as well as infections, are addressed likewise. CONCLUSIONS The consensus statement identifies points to consider when using TCZ, regarding indications, contraindications, screening, dose, comedication, response evaluation and safety. The document is aimed at supporting clinicians and informing patients, administrators and payers on opportunities and limitations of IL-6 pathway inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Correspondence to Professor Josef S Smolen, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna A-1090, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Conaghan PG, Ostergaard M, D'Agostino MA, Gaylis N, Arnold W, Olech E, Wells A, Peterfy C, Seraphine JL, Troum O. Proceedings from the 5th Annual International Society for Musculoskeletal Imaging in Rheumatology Annual Conference. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013; 42:433-46. [PMID: 23415135 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2012] [Accepted: 10/15/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Since its inception, ISEMIR has held an annual education meeting highlighting the changes in the utilization of imaging tools for the management of rheumatic diseases. ISEMIR's international faculty and world-renowned experts have discussed these topics at a very high scientific level. The evolution of the content demonstrates the rapidly changing environment in the field of rheumatology. Advances in treatment have led to the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). This publication is based upon the proceedings from the 2012 ISEMIR educational meeting that took place on April 26th in Chicago, Illinois. Presentations from the live proceedings can be viewed at www.isemir.org.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
The recent introduction of effective therapies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has increased the demand for efficient tools for diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of PsA, and has caused an increased research effort within imaging in this disease. The clinical appearance of PsA is very diverse, involving the spine, sacroiliac joints, peripheral joints and/or entheses, and accordingly imaging findings vary. In the present paper, we present a review of the recent advances in imaging in PsA, focusing primarily on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral disease manifestations.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Imaging is an integral part of the management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. Characteristic radiographic and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are key in the diagnosis. Radiography and MRI are also useful in monitoring the disease. Radiography is the conventional, albeit quite insensitive, gold standard method for assessment of structural damage in spine and sacroiliac joints, whereas MRI has gained a decisive role in monitoring disease activity in clinical trials and practice. MRI may also, if ongoing research demonstrates a sufficient reliability and sensitivity to change, become a new standard method for assessment of structural damage. Ultrasonography allows visualization of peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, but has no role in the assessment of axial manifestations. Computed tomography is a sensitive method for assessment of structural changes in the spine and sacroiliac joints, but its clinical utility is limited due to its use of ionizing radiation and lack of ability to assess the soft tissues. It is exciting that with continued dedicated research and the rapid technical development it is likely that even larger improvements in the use of imaging may occur in the decade to come, for the benefit of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Whittle SL, Colebatch AN, Buchbinder R, Edwards CJ, Adams K, Englbrecht M, Hazlewood G, Marks JL, Radner H, Ramiro S, Richards BL, Tarner IH, Aletaha D, Bombardier C, Landewé RB, Müller-Ladner U, Bijlsma JWJ, Branco JC, Bykerk VP, da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro G, Catrina AI, Hannonen P, Kiely P, Leeb B, Lie E, Martinez-Osuna P, Montecucco C, Ostergaard M, Westhovens R, Zochling J, van der Heijde D. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmacotherapy in inflammatory arthritis: integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in the 3e Initiative. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51:1416-25. [PMID: 22447886 PMCID: PMC3397467 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2011] [Revised: 01/25/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmacotherapy in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS A total of 453 rheumatologists from 17 countries participated in the 2010 3e (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative. Using a formal voting process, 89 rheumatologists representing all 17 countries selected 10 clinical questions regarding the use of pain medications in IA. Bibliographic fellows undertook a systematic literature review for each question, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and 2008-09 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR abstracts. Relevant studies were retrieved for data extraction and quality assessment. Rheumatologists from each country used this evidence to develop a set of national recommendations. Multinational recommendations were then formulated and assessed for agreement and the potential impact on clinical practice. RESULTS A total of 49,242 references were identified, from which 167 studies were included in the systematic reviews. One clinical question regarding different comorbidities was divided into two separate reviews, resulting in 11 recommendations in total. Oxford levels of evidence were applied to each recommendation. The recommendations related to the efficacy and safety of various analgesic medications, pain measurement scales and pain management in the pre-conception period, pregnancy and lactation. Finally, an algorithm for the pharmacological management of pain in IA was developed. Twenty per cent of rheumatologists reported that the algorithm would change their practice, and 75% felt the algorithm was in accordance with their current practice. CONCLUSIONS Eleven evidence-based recommendations on the management of pain by pharmacotherapy in IA were developed. They are supported by a large panel of rheumatologists from 17 countries, thus enhancing their utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel L Whittle
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia 5011, Adelaide, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wakefield RJ, D'Agostino MA, Naredo E, Buch MH, Iagnocco A, Terslev L, Ostergaard M, Backhaus M, Grassi W, Dougados M, Burmester GR, Saleem B, de Miguel E, Estrach C, Ikeda K, Gutierrez M, Thompson R, Balint P, Emery P. After treat-to-target: can a targeted ultrasound initiative improve RA outcomes?: Table 1. Postgrad Med J 2012; 88:482-6. [DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-201048rep] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
43
|
Conaghan PG, McQueen FM, Bird P, Peterfy CG, Haavardsholm EA, Gandjbakhch F, Bøyesen P, Coates L, Ejbjerg B, Eshed I, Foltz V, Hermann KG, Freeston J, Lillegraven S, Lassere M, Wiell C, Anandarajah A, Duer-Jensen A, O'Connor P, Genant HK, Emery P, Ostergaard M. Update on research and future directions of the OMERACT MRI inflammatory arthritis group. J Rheumatol 2012; 38:2031-3. [PMID: 21885512 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The OMERACT Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Task Force has developed and evolved the psoriatic arthritis MRI score (PsAMRIS) over the last few years, and at OMERACT 10, presented longitudinal evaluation by multiple readers, using PsA datasets obtained from extremity MRI magnets. Further evaluation of this score will require more PsA imaging datasets. As well, due to improved image resolution since the development of the original rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring system (RAMRIS), the Task Force has worked on semiquantitative assessment of joint space narrowing, and developed a reliable method as a potential RAMRIS addendum, although responsiveness will need to be evaluated. One of the strengths of MRI is the ability to detect subclinical synovitis, so the group worked on obtaining low disease activity/clinical remission datasets from a number of international centers and presented cross-sectional findings. Subsequent longitudinal evaluation of this unique resource will be a major continuing focus for the group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip G Conaghan
- Department of Rheumatology, Pitié Salpetrière Hospital, APHP, Université Paris 6-UPMC, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ostergaard M, Møller Døhn U, Duer-Jensen A, Hetland ML, Hørslev-Petersen K, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Junker P, Pødenphant J, Ejbjerg B. Patterns of magnetic resonance imaging bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis--which bones are most frequently involved and show the most change? J Rheumatol 2012; 38:2014-7. [PMID: 21885509 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which bones in wrists and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints most frequently show bone erosions, and which most frequently demonstrate erosive progression, in early and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS MRI datasets from 258 RA patients [126 with early RA (disease duration < 6 months)] were analyzed, of whom 223, including 126 with early RA, had 1-year followup MRI. All patients had MRI of one wrist, whereas 86 patients had additional images of 2nd-5th MCP joints, and 46 patients additional images of the contralateral wrist. MRI were evaluated blinded by one reader, according to the OMERACT RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) for erosions, and presence/absence of erosions was noted in each bone, as was presence/absence of erosive progression. RESULTS The capitate, ulna, lunate, triquetrum, and scaphoid were the 5 bones with both most frequent baseline erosions and most frequently demonstrated erosive progression. No bones were without erosions. Patterns of erosions and progression were similar in early and established RA. No major difference between dominant and nondominant wrists was detected. In the fingers, the 2nd-3rd MCP joint most frequently displayed erosions and erosive progression. CONCLUSION The distribution and frequency of bone erosion and erosive progression as detected by MRI in RA wrists and MCP joints were identified. No pattern differences between early versus established disease and dominant versus nondominant sides were detected. No bones showed erosive progression. Thus, no self-evident simplification of the RAMRIS erosion score was identified. Bone involvement patterns may be considered, when joints are selected for MRI protocols for clinical trials and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Rheumatology and Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Copenhagen.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Krintel SB, Essioux L, Wool A, Johansen JS, Schreiber E, Zekharya T, Akiva P, Ostergaard M, Hetland ML. CD6 and syntaxin binding protein 6 variants and response to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2012; 7:e38539. [PMID: 22685579 PMCID: PMC3369852 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 05/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND TNFα inhibitor therapy has greatly improved the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, however at least 30% do not respond. We aimed to investigate insertions and deletions (INDELS) associated with response to TNFα inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In the DANBIO Registry we identified 237 TNFα inhibitor naïve patients with RA (81% women; median age 56 years; disease duration 6 years) who initiated treatment with infliximab (n=160), adalimumab (n=56) or etanercept (n=21) between 1999 and 2008 according to national treatment guidelines. Clinical response was assessed at week 26 using EULAR response criteria. Based on literature, we selected 213 INDELS potentially related to RA and treatment response using the GeneVa® (Compugen) in silico database of 350,000 genetic variations in the human genome. Genomic segments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and genotyped by Sanger sequencing or fragment analysis. We tested the association between genotypes and EULAR good response versus no response, and EULAR good response versus moderate/no response using Fisher's exact test. At baseline the median DAS28 was 5.1. At week 26, 68 (29%) patients were EULAR good responders, while 81 (34%) and 88 (37%) patients were moderate and non-responders, respectively. A 19 base pair insertion within the CD6 gene was associated with EULAR good response vs. no response (OR=4.43, 95% CI: 1.99-10.09, p=7.211×10(-5)) and with EULAR good response vs. moderate/no response (OR=4.54, 95% CI: 2.29-8.99, p=3.336×10(-6)). A microsatellite within the syntaxin binding protein 6 (STXBP6) was associated with EULAR good response vs. no response (OR=4.01, 95% CI: 1.92-8.49, p=5.067×10(-5)). CONCLUSION Genetic variations within CD6 and STXBP6 may influence response to TNFα inhibitors in patients with RA.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adalimumab
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antigens, CD/genetics
- Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte/genetics
- Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid/genetics
- Carrier Proteins/genetics
- Cohort Studies
- DNA Mutational Analysis
- Denmark
- Etanercept
- Female
- Genotype
- Humans
- INDEL Mutation
- Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use
- Infliximab
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use
- Treatment Outcome
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophine B Krintel
- DANBIO Registry and Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wakefield RJ, D'Agostino MA, Naredo E, Buch MH, Iagnocco A, Terslev L, Ostergaard M, Backhaus M, Grassi W, Dougados M, Burmester GR, Saleem B, de Miguel E, Estrach C, Ikeda K, Gutierrez M, Thompson R, Balint P, Emery P. After treat-to-target: can a targeted ultrasound initiative improve RA outcomes? Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71:799-803. [PMID: 22562979 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), remission can be achieved with tight control of inflammation and early use of disease modifying agents. The importance of remission as an outcome has been recently highlighted by European League Against Rheumatism recommendations. However, remission when defined by clinical remission criteria (disease activity score, simplified disease activity index, etc) does not always equate to the complete absence of inflammation as measured by new sensitive imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US) . There is evidence that imaging synovitis is frequently found in these patients and associated with adverse clinical and functional outcomes. This article reviews the data regarding remission, ultrasound imaging and outcomes in patients with RA to provide the background to a consensus statement from an international collaboration of ultrasonographers and rheumatologists who have recently formed a research network--the Targeted Ultrasound Initiative (TUI) group. The statement proposes that targeting therapy to PD activity provides superior outcomes compared with treating to clinical targets alone and introduces the rationale for a new randomised trial using targeted ultrasound in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Wakefield
- Division of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine LIMM, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Døhn UM, Terslev L, Szkudlarek M, Hansen MS, Hetland ML, Hansen A, Madsen OR, Hasselquist M, Møller J, Ostergaard M. Detection, scoring and volume assessment of bone erosions by ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with CT. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 72:530-4. [PMID: 22589380 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for bone erosion detection in different areas of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints with multislice CT as the reference method. Second, to establish the necessary bone volume loss on CT for US to reliably detect it as an erosion, and finally to compare two semiquantitative US-erosion scoring methods. METHODS The 2nd-5th MCP joints of 49 patients with RA were examined by CT and US, and evaluated for the presence of bone erosion in each MCP joint quadrant. On CT, erosion volume was scored according to the OMERACT-RAMRIS score (bone volume loss in 10% increments of original bone volume). US erosions were scored 0-3 according to the Szkudlarek and Scoring by UltraSound Structural erosion (ScUSSe) systems, respectively. RESULTS Seven hundred and eighty-four MCP joint quadrants were examined. Erosions were detected by CT in 259 quadrants and by US in 142 quadrants. Sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of US was overall 44%/95%/78% compared with 71%/95%/90% in areas with good US accessibility (radial 2nd MCP, ulnar 5th MCP and all dorsal/palmar aspects). US detected 95% of erosions with bone volume loss >20%. In US accessible areas, 63% of erosions with 1-10% bone volume loss and 94% of erosions with >10% bone loss were detected. The two US scoring systems agreed well on large erosions, whereas the smallest erosions (Szkudlarek grade 1, of which 86% were confirmed by CT) were not scored by ScUSSe. CONCLUSION In accessible areas, US was highly accurate for detection and semiquantitative assessment of RA bone erosion. Even the smallest erosions, only detected in one plane, were generally confirmed by CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uffe Møller Døhn
- Correspondence to Dr Uffe Møller Døhn, Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Slagelse, Slagelse DK-2600, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sørensen J, Linde L, Ostergaard M, Hetland ML. Quality-adjusted life expectancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis--comparison of index scores from EQ-5D, 15D, and SF-6D. Value Health 2012; 15:334-339. [PMID: 22433765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2011] [Revised: 09/22/2011] [Accepted: 09/30/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis generated from three generic health-related quality-of-life instruments. METHODS Patients from 11 Danish rheumatology outpatient clinics were asked to report current health status using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D), 15D, and six-dimensional health state short form (derived from SF-12) (SF-6D) instruments. Clinical staff provided data on current disease status (C-reactive protein and Disease Activity Score that involves clinical assessment of 28 joints). National mortality data were retrieved from Statistics Denmark. For each of the three instruments, mean index scores were estimated by gender and 5-year age groups. Partial QALE was estimated for the age interval 30 to 79 years for different subsamples. RESULTS Although the three quality-of-life index scores were highly correlated, there were statistically significant differences between the average index scores from the three instruments. The 15D provided the highest index score and SF-6D the lowest score. For a 30-year-old patient, the partial QALE ranged from 37.9 quality-adjusted life-years using the SF-6D to 45.6 quality-adjusted life-years using the 15D. The QALE for men and women differed by 6.2%, 4.0%, and 5.3% when the calculation was based on EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D index scores, respectively. The largest differences were observed when patients were grouped by functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire score), where the EQ-5D showed a 50% difference in index score between the best and worst functional group while the SF-6D and 15D showed smaller differences (32% and 14%, respectively). DISCUSSION This analysis has shown the difference in QALE estimates related to different instruments. The study emphasizes that unless outcome studies use the same instruments and scoring algorithms, the results will not be directly comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Sørensen
- Center for Applied Health Services Research and Technology Assessment, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Emery P, van der Heijde D, Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG, Genovese MC, Keystone EC, Fleischmann R, Hsia EC, Xu W, Xu S, Rahman MU. Exploratory analyses of the association of MRI with clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70:2126-30. [PMID: 21926186 PMCID: PMC3212698 DOI: 10.1136/ard.2011.154500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate relationships between MRI and clinical/laboratory/radiographic findings in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS 637 methotrexate-naive patients (GO-BEFORE) and 444 patients with active RA despite methotrexate (GO-FORWARD) were randomly assigned to subcutaneous placebo + methotrexate, golimumab 100mg + placebo, golimumab 50mg + methotrexate, or golimumab 100mg + methotrexate every-4-weeks. In GO-BEFORE(n=318) and GO-FORWARD(n=240) substudies, MRI of dominant wrist/metacarpophalangeal joints were scored for synovitis, bone oedema and bone erosion (RA MRI scoring (RAMRIS) system). Relationships between RAMRIS scores and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), 28-joint count disease activity score (DAS28-CRP) and van der Heijde modified Sharp (vdH-S) scores were assessed. RESULTS Baseline and weeks 24/28 DAS28-CRP, CRP, and vdH-S generally correlated well with baseline and week 24 RAMRIS synovitis, oedema and erosion scores. Early (week 4) CRP changes correlated with later (week 12) RAMRIS synovitis/oedema change scores; earlier (week 12) changes in some RAMRIS scores correlated with later (weeks 24/28) changes in vdH-S. Significant correlations between RAMRIS change scores and clinical/radiographic change scores were weak. CONCLUSIONS MRI and clinical/laboratory/radiographic measures generally correlated well. Associations between earlier changes in CRP and later changes in RAMRIS synovitis/osteitis were observed. Changes in MRI and clinical/radiographic measures did not correlate well, probably because MRI is more sensitive than radiographs and more objective than DAS28-CRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Emery
- University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mandl P, Naredo E, Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, Bachta A, Backhaus M, Hammer HB, Bruyn GAW, Damjanov N, Filippucci E, Grassi W, Iagnocco A, Jousse-Joulin S, Kane D, Koski JM, Moller I, De Miguel E, Schmidt WA, Swen WAA, Szkudlarek M, Terslev L, Ziswiler HR, Ostergaard M, Balint PV. Practice of ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis and joint injection, including training and implementation, in Europe: results of a survey of experts and scientific societies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 51:184-90. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|