Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer

"Age is just a number"; frailty as a marker of peri-operative risk in head and neck surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty refers to a patient's reduced capacity to withstand stressors due to a reduction in physiologic reserves. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes following head and neck surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies incorporating 182 059 patients were included in qualitative synthesis with 15 953 (8.8%) of patients deemed as frail. Meta-analysis incorporating nine studies demonstrated that frailty is associated with an increased 30 day postoperative morbidity (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.98-3.80; p < 0.01) and meta-analysis with six studies suggested increased 30-day mortality (OR 2.94; 95% CI 2.62-3.31; p < 0.01). Preliminary meta-analyses between two and five studies suggested that frail patients had reduced overall survival and were more likely to be discharged to a nonhome location or readmitted within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty appears to be associated with poor short-term outcomes following head and neck surgery and may improve understanding of an individual patient's peri-operative risk.

Radiation Therapy in Older Adults With Cancer: A Critical Modality in Geriatric Oncology

Radiation therapy (RT) is a commonly used modality in the treatment of older adults with cancer, and RT represents an attractive oncologic treatment option, providing a noninvasive local therapy with limited systemic side effects. The Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) recently published a special series on Geriatric Oncology providing a comprehensive overview of multiple treatment modalities available to older adults with cancer. The purpose of this short review is to highlight the importance of RT in the treatment of older adults and encourage multidisciplinary participation in their care.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older people: an umbrella review of health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been in use for the last three decades. However, some doubts remain regarding its clinical use. Therefore, we aimed to capture the breadth of outcomes reported and assess the strength of evidence of the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for health outcomes in older persons.

METHODS

Umbrella review of systematic reviews of the use of CGA in older adults searching in Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and CINHAL until 05 November 2021. All possible health outcomes were eligible. Two independent reviewers extracted key data. The grading of evidence was carried out using the GRADE for intervention studies, whilst data regarding systematic reviews were reported as narrative findings.

RESULTS

Among 1,683 papers, 31 systematic reviews (19 with meta-analysis) were considered, including 279,744 subjects. Overall, 13/53 outcomes were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was high certainty of evidence that CGA reduces nursing home admission (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.89), risk of falls (RR = 0.51; 95%CI: 0.29-0.89), and pressure sores (RR = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.24-0.89) in hospital medical setting; decreases the risk of delirium (OR = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.54-0.92) in hip fracture; decreases the risk of physical frailty in community-dwelling older adults (RR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.64-0.93). Systematic reviews without meta-analysis indicate that CGA improves clinical outcomes in oncology, haematology, and in emergency department.

CONCLUSIONS

CGA seems to be beneficial in the hospital medical setting for multiple health outcomes, with a high certainty of evidence. The evidence of benefits is less strong for the use of CGA in other settings.

Construction and validation of prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is mostly seen in older patients and is associated with poor prognosis. There is no reliable method to predict the prognosis of elderly patients (≥60 years old) with metastatic NSCLC. The aim of our study was to develop and validate nomograms which accurately predict survival in this group of patients.

METHODS

NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were all identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Nomograms were constructed by significant clinicopathological variables (p < 0.05) selected in multivariate Cox analysis regression.

RESULTS

A total of 9584 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomly allocated in the training (n = 6712) and validation (n = 2872) cohorts. In training cohort, independent prognostic factors included age, gender, race, grade, tumor site, pathology, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and metastatic site (p < 0.05) for lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were identified by the Cox regression. Nomograms for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-years LCSS and OS were established and showed excellent predictive performance with a higher C-index than that of the 7th TNM staging system (LCSS: training cohort: 0.712 vs. 0.534; p < 0.001; validation cohort: 0.707 vs. 0.528; p < 0.001; OS: training cohort: 0.713 vs. 0.531; p < 0.001; validation cohort: 0.710 vs. 0.528; p < 0.001). The calibration plots showed good consistency from the predicted to actual survival probabilities both in training cohort and validation cohort. Moreover, the decision curve analysis (DCA) achieved better net clinical benefit compared with TNM staging models.

CONCLUSIONS

We established and validated novel nomograms for predicting LCSS and OS in elderly patients with metastatic NSCLC with desirable discrimination and calibration ability. These nomograms could provide personalized risk assessment for these patients and assist in clinical decision.

Health outcomes and implementation barriers and facilitators of comprehensive geriatric assessment in community settings: a systematic integrative review [PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42021229953]

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) addresses the bio-psycho-social needs of older adults through multidimensional assessments and management. Synthesising evidence on quantitative health outcomes and implementation barriers and facilitators would inform practice and policy on CGA for community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

We systematically searched four medical and social sciences electronic databases for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published from 1 January 2000 to 31 October 2020. Due to heterogeneity of articles, we narratively reviewed the synthesis of evidence on health outcomes and implementation barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS

We screened 14,151 titles and abstracts and 203 full text articles, and included 43 selected articles. Study designs included controlled intervention studies (n = 31), pre-post studies without controls (n = 4), case-control (n = 1), qualitative methods (n = 3), and mixed methods (n = 4). A majority of articles studied populations aged ≥75 years (n = 18, 42%). CGAs were most frequently conducted in the home (n = 25, 58%) and primary care settings (n = 8, 19%). CGAs were conducted by nurses in most studies (n = 22, 51%). There was evidence of improved functional status (5 of 19 RCTs, 2 of 3 pre-post), frailty and fall outcomes (3 of 6 RCTs, 1 of 1 pre-post), mental health outcomes (3 of 6 RCTs, 2 of 2 pre-post), self-rated health (1 of 6 RCTs, 1 of 1 pre-post), and quality of life (4 of 17 RCTs, 3 of 3 pre-post). Barriers to implementation of CGAs involved a lack of partnership alignment and feedback, poor acceptance of preventive work, and challenges faced by providers in operationalising and optimising CGAs. The perceived benefits of CGA that served to facilitate its implementation included the use of highly skilled staff to provide holistic assessments and patient education, and the resultant improvements in care coordination and convenience to the patients, particularly where home-based assessments and management were performed.

CONCLUSION

There is mixed evidence on the quantitative health outcomes of CGA on community-dwelling older adults. While there is perceived positive value from CGA when carried out by highly skilled staff, barriers such as bringing providers into a partnership, greater acceptance of preventive care, and operational issues could impede its implementation.

Age and competing concerns in treatment selection for women with non-metastatic HR+ and HER2- breast cancer: Current clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Newer adjuvant treatment options for non-metastatic breast cancer have increased survival. There is a need to investigate whether demographic and clinical characteristics of women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative non-metastatic breast cancer (stages I-III) differentially influence treatment decisions in older (age 65 or older) versus younger patients (under age 65).

METHODS

In a retrospective electronic medical record review, prevalence ratio with 95% confidence interval for treatment decisions in older vs younger patients was calculated using log binomial regression adjusted for race, stage, and total number of comorbidities.

RESULTS

In a sample of 537 patients, 66% were age < 65 and 34% age ≥ 65. Older patients included a higher proportion of White women (85% vs 75%, P = .02), higher number of comorbidities (P ≤0.0001), and lower stage tumors (P = .0004). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 was independently associated with fewer mastectomies (95% CI 0.65-0.96, P = .02), more lumpectomies (95% CI 1.05-1.42, P = .01), and less receipt of radiation treatment (95% CI 0.78-0.97, P = .01) and/or chemotherapy (95% CI 0.73-0.95, P = .006). In multivariate analysis, stage was independently significant for all treatment modalities, except endocrine therapy, and race was not.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that age, in addition to breast cancer stage, is a predictor of treatment modality, independent of race and number of comorbidities. Treatment modality reflects a combination of patient preference and clinician assessment of fitness for current standard of care.

Management of elderly patients with head and neck cancer

There are no established guidelines for managing older patients with head and neck cancer. Most clinical trials that define current standard therapy included few elderly patients. On the other hand, there is great variability in patients' comorbidities, physical functions, cognitive function, familial and financial background and values. The key point appears to be appropriate geriatric assessment, clarifying the patients' outcomes and a multidisciplinary team approach, including the treatment decision-making policy. Although these processes should be scientific in nature, the evidence for the treatment of elderly head and neck patients is very limited. This review summarizes the evidence available regarding the management of geriatric assessment, each treatment modality and the multidisciplinary team approach for older patients with head and neck cancers.

Geriatric impairments are prevalent and predictive of survival in older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

A systematic assessment of problems that are frequent in older age (geriatric assessment [GA]) provides prognostic information for patients undergoing cancer surgery and systemic cancer treatment. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of geriatric impairments and their impact on survival in older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-centre prospective observational study was conducted including patients ≥65 years referred for curative or palliative RT. Prior to RT, we performed a modified GA (mGA) assessing comorbidities, medications, nutritional status basic- and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) mobility, falls, cognition and depressive symptoms. Impairments in each mGA domain were defined. Overall survival (OS) was presented by Kaplan Meier plots for groups defined according to the number of impairments, and compared by log-rank test. The association between mGA domains and OS was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and July 2018, 301 patients were included, 142 (47.2%) were women. Mean age was 73.6 (SD 6.3) years, 162 (53.8%) received curative RT. During the median observation time of 24.2 months (min 0.3, max 25.9), 123 (40.9%) patients died. In the overall cohort, 49 (16.3%) patients had no geriatric impairment, 81 (26.9%) had four or more. OS significantly decreased with an increasing number of impairments (p < .01). Nutritional status (HR 0.90, 95% CI [0.81; 0.99], p = .038) and IADL function (HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.95; 1.00], p = .027) were independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric impairments were frequent among older patients with cancer receiving RT and nutritional status and IADL function predicted OS. Targeted interventions to remediate modifiable impairments may have the potential to improve OS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Cinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT03071640.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Age Among ARCAD First- and Second-Line Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the time to progression (TTP) and survival outcomes of second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer among adults aged 70 years and older compared with younger adults following progression on first-line clinical trials.

METHODS

Associations between clinical and disease characteristics, time to initial progression, and rate of receipt of second-line therapy were evaluated. TTP and overall survival (OS) were compared between older and younger adults in first- and second-line trials by Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, number of metastatic sites and presence of metastasis in the lung, liver, or peritoneum. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Older adults comprised 16.4% of patients on first-line trials (870 total older adults aged >70 years; 4419 total younger adults aged ≤70 years, on first-line trials). Older adults and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >0 were less likely to receive second-line therapy than younger adults. Odds of receiving second-line therapy decreased by 11% for each additional decade of life in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02 to 1.21, P = .01). Older and younger adults enrolled in second-line trials experienced similar median TTP and median OS (median TTP = 5.1 vs 5.2 months, respectively; median OS = 11.6 vs 12.4 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults were less likely to receive second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, though we did not observe a statistical difference in survival outcomes vs younger adults following second-line therapy. Further study should examine factors affecting decisions to treat older adults with second-line therapy. Inclusion of geriatric assessment may provide better criteria regarding the risks and benefits of second-line therapy.

Geriatric-assessment-identified functional deficits among adults with multiple myeloma with normal performance status

OBJECTIVES

Findings from a brief geriatric assessment (GA) in a cohort of adults with multiple myeloma (MM) are presented, with particular attention to the utility of the GA in identifying important deficits in adults judged to have a normal Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS ≥ 80).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults age 18 and older with MM were recruited into an observational study from 2018 to 2020. A modified Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) GA was administered at enrollment. Enrollees also completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Core 30 questionnaire (QLQ-C30), with subscales of physical, social, role, and cognitive functioning (range 0-100; higher values indicate better function). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for the full cohort and stratified by concurrent KPS (score < 80 vs ≥ 80).

RESULTS

Among 89 adults, the mean age was 69.1 years, 68% were aged ≥65 years, and 70% were white. In this cohort, 78% had KPS ≥ 80. Among those with KPS ≥ 80, functional impairments (Timed Up and Go ≥14 s and dependence in ≥1 instrumental activity of daily living) were seen in 30% and 21%, respectively, with 11% reporting ≥1 fall in the prior 6 months. At least two GA-identified deficits were detected in 50% of the overall cohort and in 41% of those with KPS ≥ 80. Among those with KPS ≥ 80, self-reported physical impairment on EORTC QLQ-C30 was noted by 34%.

CONCLUSION

Using a modified CARG GA and EORTC questionnaire, functional impairments were identified among adults considered to have a good performance status based on a KPS (≥ 80). Future studies should focus on using GA measures for therapy assignment and identifying opportunities for intervening upon GA-identified deficits.

Outcomes of Ewing sarcoma in adults over 40 years of age from a low-middle income country

Introduction

The data on outcomes and toxicity in adult Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients, particularly those aged ≥40 years, is exceedingly scarce around the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and mandates research.

Methods

The study involved histologically ascertained ES patients aged ≥40 years who registered at our institute from 2013 to 2018. Prospectively collected data were analysed for overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and chemotherapy-related toxicities.

Results

There were 66 patients, of which 34 were non-metastatic, and 32 were denovo metastatic, recurrent or had doubtful metastasis. At presentation, median age was 46 years, and 42 (63.6%) had extra-skeletal primary and 24 (36.3%) had extremity tumours. Curative treatment was offered to 40 (60.6%) patients. Significant grade 3/4 toxicities in non-metastatic and metastatic cohort, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (61.3%, 37.5%), anaemia (58.1%, 37.5%), thrombocytopenia (45.2%, 25.0%), peripheral neuropathy (25.8%, 12.5%) and dyselectrolytemia (25.8%, 6.25%). Chemotherapy-related toxicity led to death in three patients in the metastatic cohort, versus none in the non-metastatic patients. The 5 year EFS and OS for non-metastatic cohort were 53.8% and 67.8%, while the same for metastatic cohort were 20.7% and 27.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status >2 and metastasis at presentation predicted poorer EFS and OS. Additionally, raised lactate dehydrogenase, larger tumours (>8 cm) and palliative intent treatment predicted worse EFS, while extra-skeletal primary and female gender were indicators of worse OS.

Conclusions

Older adult ES patients benefit from aggressive multimodality treatment even in LMIC infrastructure. However, careful patient selection, close monitoring and pertinent dose modifications is imperative due to higher propensity for potential toxicities.

The Impact of Frailty Screening on Radiation Treatment Modification

BACKGROUND

Care overburden makes it difficult to perform comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) in oncology settings. We analyzed if screening tools modified radiotherapy in oncogeriatric patients.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 65 years, irradiated between December 2020 and March 2021 at the Hospital Provincial de Castellón, completed the frailty G8 and estimated survival Charlson questionnaires. The cohort was stratified between G8 score ≤ 14 (fragile) or >14 (robust); the cutoff point for the Charlson index was established at five.

RESULTS

Of 161 patients; 69.4% were male, the median age was 75 years (range 65-91), and the prevailing performance status (PS) was 0-1 (83.1%). Overall, 28.7% of the cohort were frail based on G8 scores, while the estimated survival at 10 years was 2.25% based on the Charlson test. The treatment administered changed up to 21% after frailty analysis. The therapies prescribed were 5.8 times more likely to be modified in frail patients based on the G8 test. In addition, patients ≥ 85 years (p = 0.01), a PS ≥ 2 (p = 0.008), and limited mobility (p = 0.024) were also associated with a potential change.

CONCLUSIONS

CGAs remain the optimal assessment tool in oncogeriatry. However, we found that the G8 fragility screening test, which is easier to integrate into patient consultations, is a reliable and efficient aid to rapid decision making.

Patterns-of-Care Analysis for Radiotherapy of Elderly Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: A Trinational Survey in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

OBJECTIVES

The number of elderly head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients is increasing, and clinical trials defining the standard of care either excluded or underrepresented elderly patients. This leaves physicians with a challenging and highly individual treatment decision largely lacking clinical evidence.

METHODS

A tri-national patterns-of-care survey was sent to all members of the German (DEGRO), Austrian (ÖGRO), and Swiss (SRO/SSRO) national societies of radiation oncology. The online questionnaire consisted of 27 questions on the treatment of elderly HNSCC patients, including 6 case-based questions. Frequency distributions and subgroup comparisons were calculated using SPSS statistics software.

RESULTS

A total of 132 answers were collected, including 46(35%) form universities, 52(39%) from non-university-hospitals and 34(26%) from private practices. 83(63%) treat 1-5 and 42(32%) >5 elderly HNSCC patients per month. Target volumes are defined analog current guidelines by 65(50%) of responders and altered based on age/comorbidities or tumor stage by 36(28%) and 28(22%), respectively. Chemotherapy is routinely administered by 108(84%) if indicated, with weekly 40mg/m² of cisplatin being the favored regimen by 68(53%) in the definitive situation and 60(47%) in the adjuvant setting. Hypofractionation and hyperfractionation/acceleration are used by 26(20%) and 11(9%), respectively. Only 7(5%) clinicians routinely recommend inpatient treatment for elderly HNSCC patients. In a typical definitive patient case, 73(63%) responders recommended chemoradiation with bilateral elective node irradiation analog current guidelines. In an adjuvant example case recommendations regarding elective volume and chemotherapy were heterogeneous. Differences between responders' institutions concern the frequency of PET-CT in staging, preventive port-catheter and PEG implantation, the choice of chemotherapy regimens and the use of alternative fractionations.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of elderly HNSCC-patients in the German-speaking countries mainly follows guidelines established for younger patients. Algorithms for patient stratification and treatment de-escalation for "unfit" elderly patients are needed.

The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113

In the FUGA-BT trial (JCOG1113), gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) showed non-inferiority to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) in overall survival (OS) with good tolerance for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We performed a subgroup analysis focused on the elderly cohort of this trial. All 354 enrolled patients in JCOG1113 were classify into two groups; < 75 (non-elderly) and ≥ 75 years (elderly) group. We investigated the influence of age on the safety analysis, including the incidence of chemotherapeutic adverse events and the efficacy analysis, including OS. There were no remarkable differences in OS between the elderly (n = 60) and the non-elderly groups (n = 294). In the elderly group, median OS was 12.7 and 17.7 months for those who received GC (n = 20) and GS (n = 40), respectively. The prevalence of all-grade adverse events was similar between the elderly and the non-elderly groups. However, among the elderly group, Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events were more frequently observed in the GC arm than in the GS arm. The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced BTC were comparable to non-elderly patients. GS may be the more favorable treatment for elderly patients with advanced BTC.

Treatment of Older Adult Patients with Glioblastoma: Moving towards the Inclusion of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Guiding Management

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, and over half of patients with newly diagnosed GBM are over the age of 65. Management of glioblastoma in older patients includes maximal safe resection followed by either radiation, chemotherapy, or combined modality treatment. Despite recent advances in the treatment of older patients with GBM, survival is still only approximately 9 months compared to approximately 15 months for the general adult population, suggesting that further research is required to optimize management in the older population. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown to have a prognostic and predictive role in the management of older patients with other cancers, and domains of the CGA have demonstrated an association with outcomes in GBM in retrospective studies. Furthermore, the CGA and other geriatric assessment tools are now starting to be prospectively investigated in older GBM populations. This review aims to outline current treatment strategies for older patients with GBM, explore the rationale for inclusion of geriatric assessment in GBM management, and highlight recent data investigating its implementation into practice.

Conditioning Regimens for Frail Patients with Acute Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: How to Strike Gently

Despite the recent dramatic progress in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy, allogeneic transplant remains a mainstay of treatment for patients with acute leukemia. The availability of novel compounds and low intensity chemotherapy regimens made it possible for a significant proportion of elderly and comorbid patients with AML or ALL to undergo curative treatment protocols. In addition, the expansion of donor availability and the recent dramatic progress in haploidentical stem cell transplant, allow the identification of an available donor for nearly every patient. Therefore, an increasing number of transplants are currently performed in elderly and frail patients with AML or ALL. However, allo-Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in this delicate setting represents an important challenge, especially regarding the selection of the conditioning protocol. Ideally, conditioning intensity should be reduced as much as possible; however, in patients with acute leukemia relapse remains the major cause of transplant failure. In this article we present modern tools to assess the patient health status before transplant, review the available data on the outcome of frail AML an ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT, and discuss how preparatory regimens can be optimized in this setting.

Frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls among patients with brain metastases: A population- and institutional-level analysis

Background

Falls in patients with cancer harbor potential for serious sequelae. Patients with brain metastases (BrM) may be especially susceptible to falls but supporting investigations are lacking. We assessed the frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls in patients with BrM using 2 data sources.

Methods

We identified 42 648 and 111 patients with BrM utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data (2008-2016) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) institutional data (2015), respectively, and characterized falls in these populations.

Results

Among SEER-Medicare patients, 10 267 (24.1%) experienced a fall that prompted medical evaluation, with cumulative incidences at 3, 6, and 12 months of 18.0%, 24.3%, and 34.1%, respectively. On multivariable Fine/Gray’s regression, older age (≥81 or 76-80 vs 66-70 years, hazard ratio [HR] 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11-1.25], P &lt; .001 and HR 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04-1.17], P &lt; .001, respectively), Charlson comorbidity score of &gt;2 vs 0-2 (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03-1.13], P = .002) and urban residence (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16], P = .03) were associated with falls. Married status (HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.98], P = .004) and Asian vs white race (HR 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99], P = .03) were associated with reduced fall risk. Identified falls were more common among BWH/DFCI patients (N = 56, 50.4% of cohort), resulting in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, fractures, and intracranial hemorrhage in 33%, 23%, 11%, and 4% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Falls are common among patients with BrM, especially older/sicker patients, and can have deleterious consequences. Risk-reduction measures, such as home safety checks, physical therapy, and medication optimization, should be considered in this population.

Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review

Cognitive assessment is a cornerstone of geriatric care. Cognitive impairment has the potential to significantly impact multiple phases of a person's cancer care experience. Accurately identifying this vulnerability is a challenge for many cancer care clinicians, thus the use of validated cognitive assessment tools are recommended. As international cancer guidelines for older adults recommend Geriatric Assessment (GA) which includes an evaluation of cognition, clinicians need to be familiar with the overall interpretation of the commonly used cognitive assessment tools. This rapid review investigated the cognitive assessment tools that were most frequently recommended by Geriatric Oncology guidelines: Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test (BOMC), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Mini-Cog, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). A detailed appraisal of the strengths and limitations of each tool was conducted, with a focus on practical aspects of implementing cognitive assessment tools into real-world clinical settings. Finally, recommendations on choosing an assessment tool and the additional considerations beyond screening are discussed.

Treatment Paradigms for Older Adults with Pancreatic Cancer: a Nuanced Approach

Pancreatic cancer is increasing in incidence in the USA. This disease disproportionately affects older adults, and as the percentage of adults > 65 years old increases with the aging of the baby boomers, the prevalence is expected to rise over the coming decade. These patients are often more susceptible to disease-related symptoms and have less ability to withstand both cancer and treatment-related side effects. Therefore, it is imperative that treating physicians thoughtfully consider their recommended treatment approach towards this vulnerable patient population. This review focuses on the current state of research of older adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, highlighting deficiencies in the representation of this patient population in clinical trials. It is vital that the treating physicians take a nuanced approach towards therapy of localized and metastatic disease in geriatric patients. A one size fits all treatment algorithm is no longer appropriate in any cancer patient, let alone the elders who are particularly vulnerable to developing treatment-related toxicities. To help guide therapy decisions, it is important to perform a comprehensive geriatric assessment which may uncover unexpected frailty and lead to a change in the recommended treatment approach. In this way, we can support older adults during therapy for this aggressive malignancy and provide optimal care.

Serial frailty assessments following allogeneic stem cell transplant in older adults: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Increasing numbers of older adults undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) as the only chance of meaningful survival for hematologic malignancies. However, toxicities in vulnerable patients may offset the benefits of SCT. Frailty and abnormal geriatric assessment (GA) prior to SCT have been associated with decreased overall survival in persons aged 60 and older. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the prevalence of baseline GA deficits and frailty, the prevalence of frailty or death at three and six months after allogeneic SCT, and associations between baseline assessments and the presence of frailty or death post-SCT.

METHODS

We enrolled 50 patients aged 60 years and older and completed a baseline GA including comorbidity, polypharmacy, nutrition, physical performance, functional status, social support, depression and anxiety, and cognition. Frailty was defined as three or more abnormalities of gait speed, grip strength, weight loss, physical activity, and exhaustion, and was assessed at baseline, three months, and six months after SCT. A composite outcome of frailty or death at three months and six months was analyzed.

RESULTS

Frailty was present in 11/50 (22%) of patients at baseline. Ten patients did not complete three- month follow-up, and twelve patients did not complete six-month follow-up. Of those with follow-up data, 22 patients (55%) were frail or deceased three months after SCT, and 27 patients (71%) were frail or deceased six months after SCT. Frailty at baseline was not significantly associated with frailty or death at three or six months after SCT. However, the study's small enrollment limits conclusions on these associations.

CONCLUSION

GA deficits and frailty are prevalent in older adult SCT recipients at baseline and after transplant. Future studies should aim for larger enrollment in order to validate associations between these deficits and outcomes, especially survival, functional status, and quality of life following SCT.

Management of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Older Adults: Balancing Risks and Benefits of Novel Therapies

The prevalence of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) will continue to increase with our aging population. Treatment of mCRC has changed significantly in the last few decades as we have learned how to personalize the treatment of mCRC to the biology of the tumor, utilizing new treatment approaches. With an ever-changing treatment paradigm, managing the population of older adults becomes paramount. This review highlights the pivotal clinical trials that defined the use of systemic therapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies for mCRC, and how those are applied to the older patient population. In addition, we outline the tools for an in-depth assessment of an older adult in regards to treatment planning and management of therapy-related toxicities. A comprehensive geriatric assessment can assist in the selection of treatment for an older adult with mCRC. While frail older patients can frequently only tolerate single agents or modified regimens, fit older adults remain candidates for a wider range of treatment options. However, since all of these treatments are associated with possible toxicities, each patient's treatment must be personalized to the patient's goals and wishes through a shared decision-making process.

The impact of age on outcome in phase III NRG Oncology/RTOG trials of radiotherapy (XRT) +/- systemic therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the role age plays in the treatment and prognosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treated definitively with radiation alone or combined modality therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of three NRG/RTOG trials examining either radiation alone or combined radiation and systemic therapy for LAHNC. The effect of age (≥70 yrs.) on cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2688 patients were analyzed, of whom 309 patients (11.5%) were ≥ 70. For all studies combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for CSS for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.14-1.55, p < 0.001). For OS, the HR for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 for all studies combined was 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.77, p < 0.001). After adjustment for all covariates, age ≥ 70 was associated with worse OS regardless of adjustment for smoking and p16 status. The survival difference was more pronounced in those receiving combined radiation and systemic therapy. Hematologic and renal toxicities were increased in combined modality trials in patients ≥70 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients age ≥ 70 with LAHNC were underrepresented in these clinical trials. Their CSS and OS proved inferior to patients <70 years old.

Prognostic value of disease risk score versus gait speed in older adults with lymphoma

Measures of physical function predict survival in older patients with lymphoma but their prognostic ability has not been compared to disease-specific risk scores. We prospectively recruited patients ≥75 years with lymphoma. Patients underwent a frailty screen including 4-m gait speed. Disease-specific risk scores were obtained retrospectively. Among 168 patients, there was no association between disease-specific risk score and survival. Conversely, faster gait speed was significantly associated with survival in the entire cohort (HR = 0.16; 95%CI, 0.06-0.42; p = 0.0003) indicating a HR of 0.63 for an increase in gait speed of 0.25 m/s. When gait speed was added to the DLBCL IPI and FLIPI separately, it was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.004 for DLBCL, p = 0.03 for FLIPI) which increased its predictive power. Our study of older lymphoma patients demonstrates gait speed may improve outcome prediction beyond standard prognostic scores.

Disparate Use of Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients With Localized Anal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is increasing, particularly among the elderly (age ≥65 years). We sought to compare patterns of care for the treatment of SCCA in elderly versus nonelderly patients.

METHODS

Data for patients with stages I-III SCCA diagnosed from 2004 through 2015 were obtained from the National Cancer Database. Patients were categorized as having received standard-of-care (SOC) chemoradiation (CRT) with multiagent chemotherapy, non-SOC therapy, palliative therapy, or no treatment. Differences in treatment groups were tested using the chi-square test. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of SOC CRT and multiagent versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients receiving CRT. Propensity score matching was used to compare overall survival (OS) in elderly patients receiving multiagent versus single-agent chemotherapy for those receiving CRT.

RESULTS

We identified 9,156 elderly and 17,640 nonelderly patients. A lower proportion of elderly versus nonelderly patients (54.5% vs 65.0%; P<.0001) received SOC CRT than other treatments or no treatment. In multivariate analysis, elderly patients were 38% less likely than nonelderly patients to receive SOC CRT (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.65; P<.0001). A higher proportion of the elderly were treated with single-agent versus multiagent chemotherapy (16.9% vs 11.8%; P<.0001), which resulted in a >1.5-fold increase in the likelihood of elderly patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.66) in multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching, 3-year OS was higher in elderly patients who received CRT with multiagent versus single-agent chemotherapy (77.1% vs 67.5%; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; P=.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this comprehensive study of patients with stages I-III SCCA, elderly patients were less likely than nonelderly patients to receive SOC CRT. The low proportion of elderly patients receiving SOC CRT with multiagent chemotherapy for localized anal cancer suggests that the optimal treatment approach for this vulnerable population remains undefined.

Impact of chemotherapy on cognitive functioning in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: a sub-study in the RESPECT trial

PURPOSE

To investigate whether postoperative adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy negatively affected cognitive functioning during the post-chemotherapy period compared with trastuzumab monotherapy in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

In the randomized RESPECT trial, women aged between 70 and 80 years with HER2-positive, stage I to IIIA invasive breast cancer who underwent curative operation were randomly assigned to receive either 1-year trastuzumab monotherapy or 1-year trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. Cognitive functioning was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test at enrollment and 1 and 3 years after initiation of the protocol treatment. The primary outcome was change in the MMSE total score from baseline. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of suspected mild cognitive impairment (MMSE total score < 28) and suspected dementia (MMSE total score < 24).

RESULTS

The analytical population consisted of 29 and 26 patients in the trastuzumab monotherapy and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy groups, respectively. The group differences in mean changes of the MMSE total score were 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.3 to 1.6) at 1 year and 0.9 (95% CI - 1.0 to 2.8) at 3 years (P = 0.136 for the group difference pooling the two visits). The prevalence of suspected mild cognitive impairment at 3 years was 41.7% in the trastuzumab monotherapy group and 28.6% in the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy group (P = 0.548).

CONCLUSION

This randomized sub-study did not show worse cognitive functioning during the post-chemotherapy period with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy than with trastuzumab monotherapy in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01104935 (first posted April 16, 2010).

Impact of age, functional status, and comorbidities on quality of life and outcomes in elderly patients with AML: review

The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia increases with age, and more than half of AML patients are over 60 years old. Treating elderly AML patients presents several challenges and uncertainties, linked partly to disease characteristics and partly to the difficulty of establishing which patients could benefit from the best treatment. Although some elderly fit patients can receive intensive therapy, many of them are not treated and not enrolled in clinical trials. Yet supportive care is associated with significantly lower survival rates compared to intensive therapy or lower intensive therapy. A poorer prognosis in elderly patients is related to age, functional status, and comorbidities, combined with leukemia characteristics. Chronological age is not the best surrogate factor for selecting patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Scoring systems-including patient characteristics (ECOG, comorbidities) and disease characteristics (cytogenetics and molecular parameters)-designed to evaluate probabilities of response to treatment, morbidity, and survival may be used to balance the risk-benefit ratio for intensive therapy. A geriatric assessment (GA) to evaluate physical function, comorbidities, nutritional status, cognitive function, and social support could help identify the most vulnerable patients so that they can receive intensive therapy. A GA would also help take the necessary steps to improve tolerance to treatment. Evaluating markers of fitness and quality of life as part of clinical trials should be favored.

Treatment strategies for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: Translating scientific evidence into clinical practice

Treatment of locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) is focused on multimodal strategy, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy (in combination or as alternative treatments), followed by surgery in selected cases. Recently, durvalumab consolidation after definitive chemo-radiation has shown a meaningful overall survival benefit. However, it is important to note that elderly patients represent a high proportion of NSCLC population and frailty and comorbidities can significantly limit treatment options. Indeed, elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials and data to drive treatment selection in this category of patients are scanty. Available data, main issues and controversies on multimodal treatment in elderly LA-NSCLC patients will be reviewed in this paper.

Our experience of nursing/allied health practitioner led geriatric screening and assessment of older patients with cancer - a highly accessible model of care

OBJECTIVE

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been proven to assist development of tailored treatment plans for older patients with cancer by identifying health issues affecting their ability to complete systemic therapy or cope with and recover from cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Metro North Hospital and Health Service (MNHHS) has significant older population with cancer. Geriatric Oncology services were commenced in February 2018 at two facilities of MNHHS [North Lakes Cancer Care Services/Caboolture Hospital (NLCCS/CBH) Cancer services and Redcliffe Hospital (RH) Cancer services]. The Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool was administered to predict patient vulnerability and need for CGA. A bespoke CGA suite comprising of 16 assessments was used. A clinical nurse or Allied Health (AH) practitioner conducted screening, followed by CGA. Proposed care was discussed at multidisciplinary case conference and AH interventions were provided.

RESULTS

From February'2018 to July'2019, the G8 was administered to 1380 patients between the two facilities (918 patients at NLCCS/CBH and 462 patients at RH), comprising oncology and haematology patients. 825 patients (59%) showed impairment on G8 and were recommended for CGA. Another 50 patients were referred for CGA as per clinical assessment despite normal G8. 65% (572) of recommended CGAs were conducted. The most common impairments identified on CGA leading to AH referrals were timed up & go >13 s, malnutrition, polypharmacy and low mood & depression.

CONCLUSION

The nursing/AH practitioner led Geriatric Oncology service is feasible, applicable and beneficial to patients. Further study is planned to assess the impact of the service on patients' health related quality of life and chemotherapy completion rates.

Frailty in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Those Undergoing Transplantation: A Scoping Review

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

Although frailty is an important parameter in treatment planning and in predicting prognosis and overall survival among patients with hematologic malignancies and recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, frailty assessment tools are not standardized in clinical care settings. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the literature on frailty assessment tools in these patient populations.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A systematic search of CINAHL®, Embase®, MEDLINE®, PubMed®, and Web of Science was performed using keywords and controlled vocabulary for the concepts "bone marrow transplants," "hematologic neoplasms," and "frailty."

DATA EVALUATION

Extracted data included study type, diagnosis, transplantation status, frailty tools used, and outcome measures.

SYNTHESIS

A systematic search resulted in 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in how various groups define and assess frailty.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Addressing the lack of standardized frailty assessments will assist healthcare providers to routinely integrate frailty measures in clinical assessments to identify those at risk for poor outcomes, improving personalized care.

Primary Anastomosis Versus End-Ostomy in Left-Sided Colonic and Proximal Rectal Cancer Surgery in the Elderly Dutch Population: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Background

Primary anastomosis (PA) in left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery in elderly patients is disputed. The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in postoperative outcomes after left-sided CRC surgery in elderly patients in The Netherlands, comparing patients with PA and those who underwent end-ostomy (EO).

Method

Patients aged ≥ 75 years with stage I–III left-sided CRC, diagnosed and surgically treated in 2015–2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 3286). Postoperative outcomes, short-term (30-, 60-, and 90-day) mortality and 3-year overall and relative survival were analyzed, stratified by surgical resection with PA versus EO. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted.

Results

Patients with higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and higher tumor stage, a perforation, ileus or tumor located in the proximal rectum, and after open or converted surgery were more likely to receive EO. No difference in anastomotic leakage was seen in PA patients with or without defunctioning stoma (6.2% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.680). Postoperative hospital stay was longer (7.0 vs. 6.0 days, p < 0.0001) and more often prolonged (19% vs. 13%, p = 0.03) in EO patients. Sixty-day mortality (2.9% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.0001), 90-day mortality (3.4% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.0001), and crude 3-year survival (81.2% vs. 58.7%, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in EO patients, remaining significant after multivariable and PSM analysis.

Conclusion

There are significant differences between elderly patients after left-sided CRC surgery with PA versus EO in terms of postoperative length of stay, short-term survival, 3-year overall survival, and relative survival at disadvantage of EO patients. This information could be important for decision making regarding surgical treatment in the elderly.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09976-y.

The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO)

BACKGROUND

Older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) experience chemotherapy dose reductions or discontinuation. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) predicts survival and chemotherapy completion in patients with cancer, but the benefit of geriatric interventions remains unexplored.

METHODS

The GERICO study is a randomised Phase 3 trial including patients ≥70 years receiving adjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy for CRC. Vulnerable patients (G8 questionnaire ≤14 points) were randomised 1:1 to CGA-based interventions or standard care, along with guideline-based chemotherapy. The primary outcome was chemotherapy completion without dose reductions or delays. Secondary outcomes were toxicity, survival and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Of 142 patients, 58% received adjuvant and 42% received first-line palliative chemotherapy. Interventions included medication changes (62%), nutritional therapy (51%) and physiotherapy (39%). More interventional patients completed scheduled chemotherapy compared with controls (45% vs. 28%, P = 0.0366). Severe toxicity occurred in 39% of controls and 28% of interventional patients (P = 0.156). QoL improved in interventional patients compared with controls with the decreased burden of illness (P = 0.048) and improved mobility (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric interventions compared with standard care increased the number of older, vulnerable patients with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy, and may improve the burden of illness and mobility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02748811.

Integrating geriatric screening in the clinical setting: Recommendations for older adult oncology patients

PURPOSE

The optimal time to assess older adults during cancer treatment regimen has not been established. This research study evaluated different points in time to reassess the geriatric oncology patient undergoing treatment.

METHODS

This study included 250 patients who were new to the Senior Adult Oncology Clinic. Inclusion criteria were actively receiving treatment of chemotherapy, hormone therapy, radiation or other targeted therapies; age 65 or older if head and neck cancer diagnosis and age 70 or older with other malignancies referred to the program; and able to read and understand English. The SAOP3 is a two-page tool consisting of eleven questions and three instructional items followed by a scoring threshold, that was repeated at the patient's three- and six-month visits.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-eight patients completed the SAOP3 at baseline; 112 completed the SAOP3 at three months; and 90 completed the SAOP3 at six months. Fifty-four patents completed the SAOP3 at all three timepoints. Overall, SAOP3 results indicated referral for 42% (95% confidence interval = 36-49%) of patients at baseline. For the 54 patients that completed the SAOP3 at all timepoints, referrals decreased across the timepoints for the two most common referrals: nutritionist which was statistically significant (p = 0.03); and social worker which was not (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Utilizing the objective findings related to functional and cognitive status can aid in treatment planning and guide goals of care discussions with patients and families. Review of the follow-up screens at three- and six-months during the treatment process demonstrated the impact of cancer treatments in the older adult.

A prospective cohort study on the safety of checkpoint inhibitors in older cancer patients - the ELDERS study

Objective

Older cancer patients are underrepresented in the pivotal trials of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of an ageing immune system on CPI-related toxicity and provide evidence for the role of geriatric assessments with CPI.

Methods

The ELDERS study is a prospective observational study with two cohorts: older (70+ years of age) and younger (<70 years of age). Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer or melanoma starting single-agent CPI were eligible. The older cohort was assessed for frailty with Geriatric-8 (G8) screening, which when positive (<15 points) was followed by a holistic set of geriatric assessments. Primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-5 immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

Results

One hundred and forty patients were enrolled with 43% being pretreated and pembrolizumab represented 92% of treatments on study. The older cohort had a significantly higher comorbidity burden (P < 0.001) and polypharmacy (P = 0.004). While 50% of older patients had a positive G8 screening, 60% on this frail subgroup had a performance status score of 0 or 1. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irAEs grade 3-5 between older and younger cohorts (18.6% versus 12.9%; odds ratio 1.55, confidence interval 95% 0.61-3.89; P = 0.353). Exposure to systemic steroids due to irAEs was numerically longer for older patients (22 versus 8 weeks; P = 0.208). A positive G8 screening predicted hospital admissions (P = 0.031) and risk of death (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

The use of CPI in older patients was not associated with more high-grade toxicity. The G8 screening identified a subgroup with higher risk of AEs and its implementation should be considered in the context of CPI.

•

The ELDERS is the first prospective study designed to address the safety of immunotherapy in older cancer patients.

•

Older cancer patients had no increased risk of high-grade toxicity with immunotherapy.

•

Management of immune toxicity in older patients is often more challenging, particularly for those more vulnerable/frail.

•

Geriatric assessments in the context of immunotherapy predict clinical outcomes.

•

Comorbidity burden, polypharmacy and the G8 screening identified those with worst outcomes.

Evaluation of access to care issues in patients with breast cancer

AIMS

System-level efforts have been deployed to improve oncology care and access while reducing utilization and costs. Understanding the nature of access to care from the perspective of patients themselves is an unmet need. This study examined access to care in a population of women with breast cancer and its relationship to overall patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with breast cancer from six oncology clinics in five states completed a survey during routine office visits. Access to care (higher scores indicated increasing access barriers), overall patient satisfaction, and patient demographic/clinical characteristics were measured. The relationships between access (composite and factor scores) and satisfaction were assessed using multivariable analyses controlling for age (the only significant characteristic from bivariate analyses).

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients completed the survey. Factor analysis of access to care items revealed an 8-factor measure - Insurance, Health System, Emotional, Holistic Treatment, Family Support, Knowledge/Understanding, Information Quality, and Financial Support - with high reliability (Composite: Cronbach alpha = 0.93; Factors: Cronbach alpha range = 0.85-0.91). Access composite score was moderately low (mean = 1.90), indicating an overall low level of access barriers, and overall patient satisfaction was high (mean = 4.59). The composite score (p < .001) and the Health System and Knowledge/Understanding factors (p < .01) were significant and negative predictors of overall satisfaction.

LIMITATIONS

Study sites were high functioning clinics and all, but one, are Oncology Care Model practices. Thus, the scope of access to care issues for patients of under-resourced clinics might not be well addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to care overall and by factor was significantly predictive of patient satisfaction with care. In addition, access to care factors varied across several demographic and clinical characteristics. Future strategies that address access to care challenges should consider these modifiable, patient-centric, and system-based issues.

Prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer are at risk of developing depressive symptoms. However, little is known about the prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study examined the prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms among older adults with cancer in the United States using the data from the 2012 and 2014 wave of the Health and Retirement Study. This analysis included 1799 older adults aged 65 and over with a self-reported diagnosis of cancer. Multivariate regression analysis was used to examine the predictors of depressive symptoms. The main predictors included age, gender, race, education, marital status, chronic conditions, and functional limitations.

RESULTS

Results revealed that the prevalence of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer was 14.9%. Results of Poisson regression revealed that greater age, belonging to a race other than White or African American, not being married, presence of more chronic conditions, and higher levels of functional limitations were associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms.

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of depressive symptoms is high in older adults with cancer and several factors predict depressive symptoms in this population. Individuals who are at high risk of developing depressive symptoms should be identified and appropriate timely interventions should be initiated to reduce the rates of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer.

The effect of treatment modifications by an onco-geriatric MDT on one-year mortality, days spent at home and postoperative complications

OBJECTIVES

Decision-making in older patients with cancer can be complex, as benefits of treatment should be weighed against possible side-effects and life-expectancy. A novel care pathway was set up incorporating geriatric assessment into treatment decision-making for older cancer patients. Treatment decisions could be modified following discussion in an onco-geriatric multidisciplinary team (MDT). We assessed the effect of treatment modifications on outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in the surgical department of a University Hospital. Patients of 70 years and older with a solid malignancy were included. All patients underwent a nurse-led geriatric assessment (GA) and were discussed in an onco-geriatric MDT. This could result in a modified or an unchanged treatment advice compared to the regular tumor board. Primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were post-operative complications and days spent in hospital in the first year after inclusion.

RESULTS

For the 184 patients in the analyses, the median age was 77.5 years and 41.8% were female. For 46 patients (25%), the treatment advice was modified by the onco-geriatric MDT. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality between the unchanged and modified group (29.7% versus 26.1%, p = 0.7). There were, however, significantly fewer days spent in hospital (median 5 vs 8.5 days p = 0.02) and fewer grade II or higher postoperative complications (13.3% versus 35.5% p = 0.005) in the modified group.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating geriatric assessment in decision-making did not lead to excess one-year mortality, but did result in fewer complications and days spent in hospital.

A new tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot study from China

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common type of hematological malignancy in elderly people. Geriatricians have developed comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) methods for elderly patients; however, the tools used for CGA in AML are not uniform. Thus, we aimed to validate the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales, age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), and albumin (IACA) index, which is a new tool for CGA, in elderly patients with AML.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥60 years who had been diagnosed with AML were screened for eligibility. Among the IACA low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using χ and Fisher exact tests. In addition, probabilities of overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 21, 34, and 6 patients were categorized into IACA low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥3 points) groups, respectively. The rates of relapse/progression-related mortality were 23.8%, 58.8%, and 100.0% in the IACA low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (χ = 12.81, P < 0.001). The 2-year probabilities of OS were 47.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.8%-72.6%) and 20.2% (95% CI 5.9%-34.5%) in the IACA low- and intermediate-risk groups, respectively (χ = 5.99, P = 0.014), which were significantly higher than those in the high-risk group (low-risk [47.7% (95% CI 22.8%-72.6%)] vs. high-risk [0], χ = 20.80, P < 0.001; intermediate-risk [20.2% (95% CI 5.9%-34.5%)] vs. high-risk [0], χ = 7.56, P = 0.006; respectively). In the IACA low-risk group, the 2-year probability of OS in patients receiving induction chemotherapy (50.8% [95% CI 24.1%-77.5%]) was significantly higher than that in those receiving best supportive care (0, χ = 25.74, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the IACA index might be a simple and effective tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly AML patients.

No Other Safe Care Option: Nursing Home Admission as a Last Resort Strategy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nursing homes are intended for older adults with the highest care needs. However, approximately 12% of all nursing home residents have similar care needs as older adults who live in the community and the reasons they are admitted to nursing homes is largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to explore the reasons why lower-care nursing home residents are living in nursing homes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A qualitative interpretive description methodology was used to gather and analyze data describing lower-care nursing home resident and family member perspectives regarding factors influencing nursing home admission, including the facilitators and barriers to living in a community setting. Data were collected via semistructured interviews and field notes. Data were coded and sorted, and patterns were identified. This resulted in themes describing this experience.

RESULTS

The main problem experienced by lower-care residents was living alone in the community. Residents and family members used many strategies to avoid safety crises in the community but experienced multiple care breakdowns in both community and health care settings. Nursing home admission was a strategy used to avoid a crisis when residents did not receive the needed support to remain in the community.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

To successfully remain in the community, older adults require specialized supports targeting mental health and substance use needs, as well as enhanced hospital discharge plans and improved information about community-based care options. Implications involve reforming policies and practices in both hospital and community-based care settings.

Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with cancer considered for surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

The Geriatric 8 (G8) has proven to be one of the most sensitive frailty-screening tools for older patients with cancer undergoing systemic treatment. In this study we validated whether the G8 is also suitable for identifying impairments in their comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients with cancer undergoing surgery. Thereby, we investigated the differences in postoperative outcomes between the fit and frail patients classified by the G8.

METHODS

Patients ≥70 years with a surgery indication because of a (suspected) malignant disease were prospectively enrolled. In all patients, a CGA was performed. The G8 results were assessed in parallel. The diagnostic value of the G8 was determined by comparing the result with the CGA as a reference test. Deficits in CGA was defined as ≥ two impairments of the CGA. Postoperative complications were retrospectively obtained from the medical record and compared between the fit and frail patients.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the G8 were 82% (95% CI 70-91), 63% (95% CI 52-73), and 85% (95% CI 75-91). In the patients with an impaired G8, a significantly prolonged hospital stay, higher rate of delirium, and higher 1-year mortality rate were seen.

CONCLUSION

The G8 is a simple and useful screening tool for identifying deficits in CGA in older patients with cancer requiring surgery. Second, we concluded that patients with an impaired G8 are more at risk for a complicated recovery from surgery.

Matched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy

BACKGROUND

Primary endocrine therapy (PET) has been used as an alternative to primary surgery for elderly with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors. Such practices are less commonly performed in Asian countries and the response to PET in Chinese cohort is still lacking. This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of PET to primary surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of Chinese patients aged 70 and above with stage I to III, ER positive breast cancer treated at a University affiliated tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one case-control survival analysis of patients treated with PET or primary operation was performed, using propensity score case-match analysis to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

292 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period. 209 patients received primary operation, whereas 83 patients received PET. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one matching was performed, and the dataset was stratified into survival time within 0-5 years and beyond 5 years. Both groups had similar survival within 0-5 years (p = 0.63). The survival curves diverged beyond 5 years, with a significantly better outcome in patients operated than those treated with PET (p = 0.0029).

CONCLUSIONS

For frail older patients with limited life expectancy, PET may be appropriate since equivalent survival can be achieved for PET with or without surgery. Those patients with longer life expectancy may gain survival benefits from local treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is useful to predict the survival probability and guide the optimal treatment.

Immunotherapy in Older Patients with Advanced Melanoma: A Review of the Current Evidence

Despite the increasing incidence of metastatic melanoma in the older population, there is relatively limited specific data surrounding the use of immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma for patients above the age of 65 years. To date, there has not been a prospective trial done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using immunotherapy to treat older patients with advanced melanoma. Older patients are often under-represented in clinical trials. In addition, older patients in clinical trials may have lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score and fewer co-morbidities, and thus trial data may not truly reflect the experience of treating older patients. The purpose of this descriptive review is to examine the efficacy and safety data of the three currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced melanoma treatment in older patients. Our review of available data established that the efficacy and tolerability of immunotherapy in older patients are comparable to results seen in younger patients. However, a dedicated, prospective, randomised trial to assess the safety, tolerability, and quality-of-life parameters of immunotherapy in the older population would provide further insight on the value of these treatments.

Perspectives on cancer care in older patients in France

In France, cancer is the leading cause of death. Its incidence is increasing due to the growing population and longer life expectancy. Although older adults represent most new cases, they remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Their prognosis is often worse due to delayed diagnosis and multimorbidities. Geriatric oncology has made great strides worldwide, highlighted by important studies implementing geriatric assessment in clinical research and supported by the successive national cancer plans. This paper reviews the most important actions taken in France during the last decade to improve the management of older patients with cancer.

Main challenges in survivorship transitions: Perspectives of older adults with cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe main challenges experienced by older adults (75+ years) following primary cancer treatment as a basis for development of age-appropriate survivorship care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national survey was conducted across ten Canadian provinces to identify experiences with follow-up for cancer survivors one to three years post-treatment. The survey included open-ended questions for respondents to add details that offered deeper insight into their experiences. This publication presents analysis of responses from older adults (75+ years) about the main challenge they faced in transitioning to survivorship.

RESULTS

In total, 3274 older adults (75+ years) responded to the survey and 2057 responded to the main challenge question. Fifty-five percent were male, 72% had not experienced metastatic disease and 75% reported comorbid conditions. The 1571 (48.0%) respondents reporting at least one main challenge described 2426 challenges categorized as physical, emotional, practical, lifestyle adjustments, health care delivery, and relationships/support. Physical challenges were identified most frequently (68.2%, n = 1655) including physical capacity (35.8%), symptoms/side effects (32.7%), and changes in bodily function/appearance (31.3%). Thematic analysis revealed three themes: 'getting back on my feet', 'adjusting to the changes', and 'finding the support I needed'.

CONCLUSION

This work highlights gaps in early cancer survivorship for older adults and raises concerns about unexamined ageism within the Canadian cancer care system. A need for comprehensive geriatric assessments is evident before and toward the end of primary treatment to individualize care plans. Proactive provision of information about managing changes from treatment, offered in meaningful multi-modal ways, is important.