Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: ASCO Guideline

Revolutionizing gastric cancer treatment: The potential of immunotherapy

Gastric cancer, a prevalent malignancy worldwide, ranks sixth in terms of frequency and third in fatality, causing over a million new cases and 769000 annual deaths. Predominant in Eastern Europe and Eastern Asia, risk factors include family medical history, dietary habits, tobacco use, Helicobacter pylori, and Epstein-Barr virus infections. Unfortunately, gastric cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to a grim prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate below 5%. Surgical intervention, particularly with D2 Lymphadenectomy, is the mainstay for early-stage cases but offers limited success. For advanced cases, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapy. Emerging immunotherapy presents promise, especially for unresectable or metastatic cases, with strategies like immune checkpoint inhi-bitors, tumor vaccines, adoptive immunotherapy, and nonspecific immunomodulators. In this Editorial, with regards to the article "Advances and key focus areas in gastric cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive scientometric and clinical trial review", we address the advances in the field of immunotherapy in gastric cancer and its future prospects.

Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients With HER2-Expressing Solid Tumors: Primary Results From the DESTINY-PanTumor02 Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved in HER2-expressing breast and gastric cancers and HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Treatments are limited for other HER2-expressing solid tumors.

METHODS

This open-label phase II study evaluated T-DXd (5.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) for HER2-expressing (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+/2+ by local or central testing) locally advanced or metastatic disease after ≥1 systemic treatment or without alternative treatments. The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included safety, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

At primary analysis, 267 patients received treatment across seven tumor cohorts: endometrial, cervical, ovarian, bladder, biliary tract, pancreatic, and other. The median follow-up was 12.75 months. In all patients, the ORR was 37.1% (n = 99; [95% CI, 31.3 to 43.2]), with responses in all cohorts; the median DOR was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 17.8); the median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.0); and the median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.9 to 15.5). In patients with central HER2 IHC 3+ expression (n = 75), the ORR was 61.3% (95% CI, 49.4 to 72.4), the median DOR was 22.1 months (95% CI, 9.6 to not reached), the median PFS was 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 13.0), and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI, 15.3 to 29.6). Grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events were observed in 40.8% of patients; 10.5% experienced adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD), with three deaths.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates durable clinical benefit, meaningful survival outcomes, and safety consistent with the known profile (including ILD) in pretreated patients with HER2-expressing tumors receiving T-DXd. Greatest benefit was observed for the IHC 3+ population. These data support the potential role of T-DXd as a tumor-agnostic therapy for patients with HER2-expressing solid tumors.

Drug Shortages in Oncology: ASCO Clinical Guidance for Alternative Treatments

PURPOSE

To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer clinical guidance on navigating the complexities of treatment planning amid antineoplastic drug shortages.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of oncologists, ethicists, and patient advocates was assembled to provide rapid clinical guidance to help providers navigate appropriate patient care in cases where rationing or alternative therapies must be considered. The groups of content experts developed general principles for resource allocation during shortages and clinical guidance on alternative therapies for specific disease sites. The recommendations are supported by evidence when available.

RESULTS

A total of 44 volunteers with content expertise formed the Advisory Group that developed general guidance on the prioritization of antineoplastic agents in limited supply. Disease site-specific clinical guidance was then produced by subgroups on the basis of members' specialties and expertise. The majority of alternative treatment options were developed in consideration of cisplatin and carboplatin shortages. All guidance is posted on ASCO's website.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The prioritization of antineoplastic agents in limited supply should be based on specific goals of the therapy where evidence-based medicine has shown survival outcome and life-extending benefit in both early and advanced stages. Recommendations for specific disease sites are presented. While management options vary according to the disease site, alternatives are presented. For settings in which there are no alternatives with comparable efficacy and safety, it is recommended that patients are referred to an area where the necessary drug is available or can be obtained.Additional information is available at asco.org/drug-shortages.

Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers

Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.

Potential Predictive Immune and Metabolic Biomarkers of Tumor Microenvironment Regarding Pathological and Clinical Response in Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in therapy response and modulation of immunologic surveillance. Adjuvant immunotherapy has recently been introduced in post-surgery treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) remains a valuable imaging tool to assess therapy response and to visualize metabolic TME; however, there is still a paucity in understanding the interaction between the TME and nCRT response. This systematic review investigated the potential of TME biomarkers and 18F-FDG-PET/CT features to predict pathological and clinical response (CR) after nCRT in EC.

METHODS

A literature search of the Medline and Embase electronic databases identified 4190 studies. Studies regarding immune and metabolic TME biomarkers and 18F-FDG-PET/CT features were included for predicting pathological response (PR) and/or CR after nCRT. Separate analyses were performed for 18F-FDG-PET/CT markers and these TME biomarkers.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 21 studies-10 about immune and metabolic markers alone and 11 with additional 18F-FDG-PET/CT features. High CD8 infiltration before and after nCRT, and CD3 and CD4 infiltration after nCRT, generally correlated with better PR. A high expression of tumoral or stromal programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) after nCRT was generally associated with poor PR. Moreover, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of the primary tumor were potentially predictive for clinical and PR.

CONCLUSION

CD8, CD4, CD3, and PD-L1 are promising immune markers in predicting PR, whereas TLG and MTV are potential 18F-FDG-PET/CT features to predict clinical and PR after nCRT in EC.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: A Review in Gastric or Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu®) is a human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugate that is approved in several countries globally for adults with advanced HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma who have received a prior trastuzumab-based regime. In the phase II DESTINY-Gastric01 trial, intravenous trastuzumab deruxtecan was significantly more effective than standard chemotherapy (physician's choice of intravenous irinotecan or paclitaxel) in achieving objective response and improving overall survival in Japanese or South Korean adults with advanced HER2-positive gastric or GOJ adenocarcinoma who had received two or more previous therapies. In the phase II DESTINY-Gastric02 trial, trastuzumab deruxtecan was able to induce durable response in adults from the USA or Europe with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or GOJ adenocarcinoma. Trastuzumab deruxtecan was generally tolerable in these patients; the most common adverse events included nausea, neutropenia, fatigue and decreased appetite. Trastuzumab deruxtecan carries regulatory warnings (including boxed warnings in the USA) for interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis and embryo-foetal toxicity. Current evidence indicates that trastuzumab deruxtecan is an effective treatment option, and is generally tolerable, in previously treated adults with advanced HER2-positive gastric or GOJ adenocarcinoma.

Standardized and quality-assured predictive PD-L1 testing in the upper gastrointestinal tract

As a result of the high approval dynamics and the growing number of immuno-oncological concepts, the complexity of treatment decisions and control in the area of cancers of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and stomach is constantly increasing. Since the treatment indication for PD-1 inhibitors that are currently approved in the European Union is often linked to the expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1), the evaluation of tissue-based predictive markers by the pathologist is of crucial importance for treatment stratification. Even though the immunohistochemical analysis of the PD-L1 expression status is one of the best studied, therapy-relevant biomarkers for an immuno-oncological treatment, due to the high heterogeneity of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract, there are challenges in daily clinical diagnostic work with regard to implementation, standardization and interpretation of testing. An interdisciplinary group of experts from Germany has taken a position on relevant questions from daily pathological and clinical practice, which concern the starting material, quality-assured testing and the interpretation of pathological findings, and has developed recommendations for structured reporting.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Dosing in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Gastric Cancer: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Response Analysis

This study evaluated the benefit/risk of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 6.4 mg/kg in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer using pharmacometrics. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using data from patients with gastric cancer, breast cancer, or other tumors in T-DXd clinical trials, primarily conducted in Asia. Post hoc model-estimated pharmacokinetic metrics were used in exposure-efficacy (objective response rates, ORRs) and exposure-safety analyses. The PopPK analysis included 808 patients (217 with gastric cancer, 512 with breast cancer, and 79 with other cancers). In gastric cancer, the T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg steady-state exposure metrics were lower compared with 6.4 mg/kg in breast cancer, but were similar to 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. Tumor type was selected as a significant covariate on T-DXd clearance. In exposure-efficacy analysis among 160 patients with gastric cancer, the T-DXd steady-state minimum concentration was associated with a confirmed ORR in univariate logistic regression analysis (P = .023). The model-predicted confirmed ORRs in gastric cancer were 36.0% (90%CI 29.3% to 43.7%) with 5.4 mg/kg and 40.0% (90%CI 33.1% to 47.6%) with 6.4 mg/kg. Among 808 patients in the exposure-safety analyses, the model-predicted estimates for the rates of any-grade interstitial lung disease (ILD) over a period of 180 days were 10.2% (90%CI 8.7% to 12.8%) with 6.4 mg/kg in gastric cancer and 9.7% (90%CI 8.2% to 11.8%) with 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. In gastric cancer, the efficacy of T-DXd was higher at 6.4 mg/kg than at 5.4 mg/kg. Exposure and ILD rates were comparable between 6.4 mg/kg in gastric cancer and 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. This study identified T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg as the recommended dose in HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Advances and key focus areas in gastric cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive scientometric and clinical trial review (1999-2023)

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the sixth most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Current treatments mainly rely on surgery- and chemotherapy-based systemic; however, the prognosis remains poor for advanced disease. Recent studies have suggested that immunotherapy has significant potential in cancer therapy; thus, GC immunotherapy may improve quality of life and survival for patients with this disease.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive overview of the knowledge structure and research hotspots of GC immunotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications on immunotherapy related to GC in the Web of Science Core Collection database. We analyzed 2013 pub-lications from 1999 to February 1, 2023, using the VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. We assessed publication and citation distributions using the WoS platform and explored research countries, institutions, journals, authors, references, and keywords (co-occurrence, timeline view, and burst analysis). In addition, we examined 228 trials on immunotherapy, 137 on adoptive cell therapy, 274 on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and 23 on vaccines from ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The Impact Index Per Article for the top ten high-cited papers collected from Reference Citation Analysis (RCA) are presented.

RESULTS

Our bibliometric analysis revealed that the study of immunotherapy in GC has developed rapidly in recent years. China accounted for almost half the publications, followed by the United States. The number of publications in recent years has been growing continuously, and most institutions and authors with the most publications are from China. The main keywords or clusters identified were "tumor microenvironment", "adoptive immunotherapy", "dendritic therapy", and "microsatellite instability".

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of 2013 publications indicated that immunotherapy for GC has led to several new developments in recent years. Considerable progress has been made in vaccinations, immune checkpoint therapy, and adoptive cellular therapy. In particular, ICIs and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells are novel options for the treatment of GC. We suggest that the combination of ICIs, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and other immunotherapies should be the primary research direction in the future.

Current and Emerging Role of Monoclonal Antibody-Based First-Line Treatment in Advanced Gastro-Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and one of the main causes of cancer-related death. While surgical treatment is the only curative option for early disease, many have inoperable or advanced disease at diagnosis. Treatment in this case would be a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Gastro-esophageal (GEJ) and gastric cancer (GC) genetic profiling with current molecular diagnostic techniques has significantly changed the therapeutic landscape in advanced cancers. The identification of key players in GEJ and GC survival and proliferation, such as human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), has allowed for the individualization of advanced cancer treatment and significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival of patients. This review comprehensively examines the current and emerging role of monoclonal antibody-based first-line treatments in advanced GEJ and GC. We explore the impact of monoclonal antibodies targeting HER2, VEGF, PD-1/PD-L1, and Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) on the first-line treatment landscape by talking about key clinical trials. This review emphasizes the importance of biomarker testing for optimal treatment selection and provides practical recommendations based on ASCO guidelines.

ILUSTRO: Phase II Multicohort Trial of Zolbetuximab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Claudin 18.2-Positive Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Zolbetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and mediates tumor cell death through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. We sought to examine zolbetuximab combinations in CLDN18.2-positive HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II study assessed efficacy and safety of zolbetuximab, alone or with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) or pembrolizumab, in CLDN18.2-positive advanced/metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients received zolbetuximab as monotherapy in third/later-line (Cohort 1A, n = 30), with mFOLFOX6 in first-line (Cohort 2, n = 21), or with pembrolizumab in third/later-line (Cohort 3A, n = 3) treatment. The primary endpoint for Cohort 1A was objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints were ORR (Cohorts 2 and 3A), overall survival (OS; Cohort 1A), and progression-free survival (PFS) and safety (all cohorts).

RESULTS

ORR was 0% in Cohorts 1A and 3A, and 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 47.82-88.72] in Cohort 2. Median PFS was 1.54 months (95% CI, 1.31-2.56) in Cohort 1A, 2.96 months (95% CI, 1.48-4.44) in Cohort 3A, and 17.8 months (95% CI, 8.05-25.69) in Cohort 2. Median OS in Cohort 1A was 5.62 months (95% CI, 2.27-11.53). Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred across cohorts [nausea, 63%-90% (grade ≥ 3, 4.8%-6.7%) and vomiting, 33%-67% (grade ≥ 3, 6.7%-9.5%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 demonstrated promising efficacy in previously untreated patients with CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. These data support the first-line development of zolbetuximab in patients whose tumors are CLDN18.2-positive. Across cohorts, zolbetuximab treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals.

Deep Learning-Based Stratification of Gastric Cancer Patients from Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Whole Slide Images by Predicting Molecular Features for Immunotherapy Response

Determining the molecular characteristics of cancer patients is crucial for optimal immunotherapy decisions. The aim of this study was to screen immunotherapy beneficiaries by predicting key molecular features from hematoxylin and eosin-stained images based on deep learning models. An independent data set from Asian gastric cancer patients was included for external validation. In addition, a segmentation model (Horizontal-Vertical Network) was used to quantify the cellular composition of tumor stroma. The model performance was evaluated by measuring the area under the curve (AUC). The tumor extraction model achieved an AUC of 0.9386 and 0.9062 in the internal and external test sets, respectively. The stratification model could predict the immunotherapy-sensitive subtypes (AUC range, 0.8685 to 0.9461), the genetic mutations (AUC range, 0.8283 to 0.9225), and the pathway activity (AUC range, 0.7568 to 0.8612) fairly accurately. In external validation, the prediction performance of Epstein-Barr virus and programmed cell death ligand 1 expression status achieved AUCs of 0.7906 and 0.6384, respectively. The segmentation model identified a relatively high proportion of inflammatory cells and connective cells in some immunotherapy-sensitive subtypes. The deep learning-based models potentially may serve as a valuable tool to screen for the beneficiaries of immunotherapy in gastric cancer patients.

Pancreatic Cancer-Secreted Proteins: Targeting Their Functions in Tumor Microenvironment

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a ravaging disease with a poor prognosis, requiring a more detailed understanding of its biology to foster the development of effective therapies. The unsatisfactory results of treatments targeting cell proliferation and its related mechanisms suggest a shift in focus towards the inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we discuss the role of cancer-secreted proteins in the complex TME tumor-stroma crosstalk, shedding lights on druggable molecular targets for the development of innovative, safer and more efficient therapeutic strategies.

Pemphigus vulgaris as an immune-related adverse event in recurrent metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab: a case report and literature review

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy is approved for patients with unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Although a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), compared to conventional chemotherapy, can improve overall survival in patients with advanced ESCC, this increases the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we describe an ESCC case that developed pemphigus vulgaris (PV), an extremely rare cutaneous irAE, during ipilimumab plus nivolumab treatment. The patient achieved a partial response to treatment. The PV was successfully managed after the cessation of ipilimumab and the use of a topical steroid. We should thus re-treat ESCC with nivolumab monotherapy. In the era of ICIs as standard cancer therapeutics, diagnostic criteria for blistering diseases need to be established to properly manage patients with cutaneous irAEs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 as the first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

Background: The SPOTLIGHT trial demonstrated that zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (ZOL-FO) as a first-line regimen compared with placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (PLB-FO) conferred clinical benefits to patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. However, due to the high cost of zolbetuximab, whether ZOL-FO is cost-effective compared with PLB-FO is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ZOL-FO as a first-line treatment option for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: Markov models with three different health states were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of ZOL-FO as a first-line treatment option for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical efficacy data were obtained from the SPOTLIGHT trial; the drug's cost was calculated at national bid prices, and other costs and utility values were obtained from the published literature. Outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The model's robustness was verified using one-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: The ZOL-FO group gained 1.64 QALYs at $87,746.35, while the PLB-FO group gained 1.23 QALYs at $11,947.81. The ICER for ZOL-FO versus PLB-FO was $185,353.28 per QALY gained. The parameters exerting an important impact on the model results were the price of zolbetuximab, body surface area, and progression-free survival utility. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,201/QALY, ZOL-FO had a 0% probability of cost-effectiveness compared with PLB-FO. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, ZOL-FO is unlikely to be cost-effective as the first-line treatment option for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial

There is an urgent need for first-line treatment options for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is expressed in normal gastric cells and maintained in malignant G/GEJ adenocarcinoma cells. GLOW (closed enrollment), a global, double-blind, phase 3 study, examined zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CLDN18.2, plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients (n = 507) were randomized 1:1 (block sizes of two) to zolbetuximab plus CAPOX or placebo plus CAPOX. GLOW met the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (median, 8.21 months versus 6.80 months with zolbetuximab versus placebo; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.687; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.544-0.866; P = 0.0007) and key secondary endpoint of overall survival (median, 14.39 months versus 12.16 months; HR = 0.771; 95% CI, 0.615-0.965; P = 0.0118). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were similar with zolbetuximab (72.8%) and placebo (69.9%). Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX represents a potential new first-line therapy for patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03653507 .

Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPOTLIGHT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2), has shown efficacy in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We report the results of the SPOTLIGHT trial, which investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (modified folinic acid [or levofolinate], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin regimen) versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

SPOTLIGHT is a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients from 215 centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with CLDN18.2-positive (defined as ≥75% of tumour cells showing moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining), HER2-negative (based on local or central evaluation), previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with radiologically evaluable disease (measurable or non-measurable) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via interactive response technology and stratified according to region, number of organs with metastases, and previous gastrectomy. Patients received zolbetuximab (800 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) plus mFOLFOX6 (every 2 weeks) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent review committee in all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03504397, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between June 21, 2018, and April 1, 2022, 565 patients were randomly assigned to receive either zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (283 patients; the zolbetuximab group) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (282 patients; the placebo group). At least one dose of treatment was administered to 279 (99%) of 283 patients in the zolbetuximab group and 278 (99%) of 282 patients in the placebo group. In the zolbetuximab group, 176 (62%) patients were male and 107 (38%) were female. In the placebo group, 175 (62%) patients were male and 107 (38%) were female. The median follow-up duration for progression-free survival was 12·94 months in the zolbetuximab group versus 12·65 months in the placebo group. Zolbetuximab treatment showed a significant reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·0066). The median progression-free survival was 10·61 months (95% CI 8·90-12·48) in the zolbetuximab group versus 8·67 months (8·21-10·28) in the placebo group. Zolbetuximab treatment also showed a significant reduction in the risk of death versus placebo (HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·0053). Treatment-emergent grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 242 (87%) of 279 patients in the zolbetuximab group versus 216 (78%) of 278 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (2%) patients in the zolbetuximab group versus four (1%) patients in the placebo group. No new safety signals were identified.

INTERPRETATION

Targeting CLDN18.2 with zolbetuximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with mFOLFOX6 versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 might represent a new first-line treatment in these patients.

FUNDING

Astellas Pharma, Inc.

FMO family may serve as novel marker and potential therapeutic target for the peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer

Objective

To explore the relationship between flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMOs) and peritoneal metastasis (PM) in gastric cancer (GC).

Materials and methods

TIMER 2.0 was used to perform pan-cancer analysis and assess the correlation between the expression of FMOs and cancers. A dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was used to analyze the correlation between FMOs and clinicopathological features of GC. PM is well established as the most common mode of metastasis in GC. To further analyze the correlation between FMOs and PM of GC, a dataset was obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The results were validated by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between FMOs and PM of GC was explored, and a novel PM risk signature was constructed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. The regression model's validity was tested by multisampling. A nomogram was established based on the model for predicting PM in GC patients. The mechanism of FMOs in GC patients presenting with PM was assessed by conducting Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses in TCGA and GEO datasets. Finally, the potential relationship between FMOs and immunotherapy was analyzed.

Results

The pan-cancer analysis in TCGA and GEO datasets showed that FMO1 was upregulated, while FMO2 and FMO4 were downregulated in GC. Moreover, FMO1 and FMO2 correlated positively with the T and N stage of GC in the TCGA dataset. FMO1 and FMO2 expression was a risk factor for GC (hazard ratio: 1.112 and 1.185). The overexpression of FMO1 was significantly correlated with worse disease-free-survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, no relationship was found between FMO2 expression in GC and DFS and OS. PM was highly prevalent among GC patients and typically associated with a worse prognosis. FMO1 was highly expressed in GC with PM. FMO1 and FMO2 were positively correlated with PM in GC. We identified a 12-gene panel for predicting the PM risk signature by LASSO (Area Under Curve (AUC) = 0.948, 95%CI: 0.896-1.000). A 10-gene panel for PM prediction was identified (AUC = 0.932, 95%CI: 0.874-0.990), comprising FMO1 and FMO2. To establish a model for clinical application, a 7-gene panel was established (AUC = 0.927, 95% CI: 0.877-0.977) and successfully validated by multisampling. (AUC = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.878-0.906). GO and KEGG analyses suggest that FMO1 and FMO2 regulate the extracellular matrix and cell adhesion. FMO1 and FMO2 were positively correlated with the immune score of GC, and their expression was associated with the infiltration of immune cells.

Conclusion

PM in GC is strongly correlated with FMOs. Overall, FMO1 and FMO2 have huge prospects for application as novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets.

Therapeutic Advances in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Cancers

Gastroesophageal cancers are a group of aggressive malignancies that are inherently heterogeneous with poor prognosis. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma all have distinct underlying molecular biology, which can impact available targets and treatment response. Multimodality therapy is needed in the localized setting and treatment decisions require multidisciplinary discussions. Systemic therapies for treatment of advanced/metastatic disease should be biomarker-driven, when appropriate. Current FDA approved treatments include HER2-targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, novel therapeutic targets are under development and future treatments will be personalized based on molecular profiling. Herein, we review the current treatment approaches and discuss promising advances in targeted therapies for gastroesophageal cancers.

Improving outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer

The care of patients with oesophageal cancer or of individuals who have an elevated risk of oesophageal cancer has changed dramatically. The epidemiology of squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus has diverged over the past several decades, with a marked increase in incidence only for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Only in the past decade, however, have molecular features that distinguish these two forms of the disease been identified. This advance has the potential to improve screening for oesophageal cancers through the development of novel minimally invasive diagnostic technologies predicated on cancer-specific genomic or epigenetic alterations. Surgical techniques have also evolved towards less invasive approaches associated with less morbidity, without compromising oncological outcomes. With improvements in multidisciplinary care, advances in radiotherapy and new tools to detect minimal residual disease, certain patients may no longer even require surgical tumour resection. However, perhaps the most anticipated advance in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer is the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, which harness and enhance the host immune response against cancer. In this Review, we discuss all these advances in the management of oesophageal cancer, representing only the beginning of a transformation in our quest to improve patient outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in China

Objective: This study was aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of all available programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. Methods: A partitioned survival model with a 3-week cycle and a 10-year time horizon was constructed based on a network meta-analysis. The survival data and utility values were derived from clinical trials, and the direct medical costs were collected from public drug bidding database and published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Scenario, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty around model parameters. Results: Compared with mono-chemotherapy, toripalimab, sintilimab and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy were cost-effective treatment regimens, while serplulimab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab plus chemotherapy were not cost-effective options. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy provided the highest QALYs of 0.95 with the lower cost of $8,110.53 compared to other competing alternatives. The robustness of the base-case results was confirmed by scenario and one-way sensitivity analysis. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of three times per capita gross domestic product ($38,351.20) in 2021, the probability of toripalimab plus chemotherapy being the optimal option was 74.25% compared with other six competing alternatives. Conclusion: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy represented the most cost-effective option as the first-line therapy for advanced ESCC patients in China.

Perioperative Tailored Treatments for Gastric Cancer: Times Are Changing

Resectable gastric or gastroesophageal (G/GEJ) cancer is a heterogeneous disease with no defined molecularly based treatment strategy. Unfortunately, nearly half of patients experience disease recurrence despite standard treatments (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and surgery). In this review, we summarize the evidence of potential tailored approaches in perioperative treatment of G/GEJ cancer, with a special focus on patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)-positive and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. In patients with resectable MSI-H G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, the ongoing INFINITY trial introduces the concept of non-operative management for patients with complete clinical-pathological-molecular response, and this could be a novel and potential practice changing strategy. Other pathways involving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), claudin18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2), and DNA damage repair proteins are also described, with limited evidence until now. Although tailored therapy appears to be a promising strategy for resectable G/GEJ cancer, there are several methodological issues to address: inadequate sample size for pivotal trials, underestimation of subgroup effects, and choice of primary endpoint (tumor-centered vs. patient-centered endpoints). A better optimization of G/GEJ cancer treatment allows maximizing patient outcomes. In the perioperative phase, although caution is mandatory, times are changing and tailored strategies could introduce new treatment concepts. Overall, MSI-H G/GEJ cancer patients possess the characteristics to be the subgroup that could receive the most benefit from a tailored approach.

Rare Case of Advanced Gastric Cancer Complicated with Fibrinogen Storage Disease Treated with Chemotherapy plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Case Report

The administration of chemotherapy to cancer patients with organ dysfunction raises concerns regarding its safety. The safety profile of patients with organ dysfunction due to rare diseases treated with chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor is limited. Fibrinogen storage disease (FSD) is a rare disease that causes liver dysfunction through endoplasmic reticulum stress response due to abnormal accumulation of fibrinogen in the endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes. Although chemotherapy plus nivolumab is recommended as a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its safety profile for patients with FSD is rarely available. In this study, an 80-year-old male with gastric cancer with positive lavage cytology was scheduled to receive palliative chemotherapy. This case had liver dysfunction of unknown cause, and a liver biopsy was performed. Histopathological findings revealed a diagnosis of type II/III fibrinogen inclusion based on morphology and immunohistochemistry. Liver function was recovered by administering ursodeoxycholic acid. Therefore, the combination chemotherapy of S-1, oxaliplatin, with nivolumab as palliative chemotherapy was initiated. The case responded well to chemotherapy and achieved conversion surgery without worsening of liver function. We report a case of AGC with fibrinogen inclusion complication where chemotherapy was safely administered with a good outcome. The combination therapy of cytotoxic drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be safely and effectively administered to such patients.

Evaluation of second-line apatinib plus irinotecan as a treatment for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal conjunction adenocarcinoma: a prospective, multicenter phase II trial

Objective

Apatinib and irinotecan are used as systematic therapies for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA), while the evidence for their combination as second-line therapy in these patients is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line apatinib plus irinotecan for the treatment of GAC and GEJA.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter phase II clinical study, 28 patients with advanced GAC or GEJA who received second-line apatinib plus irinotecan were recruited.

Results

In total, 1 (3.6%) patient achieved complete response, 7 (25.0%) patients achieved partial response, 13 (46.4%) patients had stable disease, and 4 (14.3%) patients showed progressive disease, while clinical response was not evaluable or not assessed in 3 (10.7%) patients. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 28.6% and 75.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the median (95% confidence interval (CI)) progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 (3.9-5.1) months, and the median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) was 11.3 (7.4-15.1) months. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, male sex, liver metastasis, and peritoneal metastasis were independently associated with worse PFS or OS, while treatment duration ≥5 months was independently associated with better OS. In terms of the safety profile, 89.3% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade, among which 82.1% of patients had grade 1-2 adverse events and 64.3% of patients had grade 3-4 adverse events.

Conclusion

Apatinib plus irinotecan as second-line therapy achieves a good treatment response and satisfactory survival with tolerable safety in patients with advanced GAC or GEJA.