Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity in Older Adults Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment landscape for adults with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies, but few studies have examined outcomes in older adults. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and treatment toxicity in older adults receiving CAR-T for hematologic malignancies and to describe outcomes and toxicities in older adults age 75+ years compared to those age 65 to 74 years. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 141 adult patients age 65+ years (46.1% age 75+ years) who received commercial CAR-T at Massachusetts General Hospital between December 2017 and June 2023. We abstracted clinical outcomes from a review of the electronic health record, including (1) toxicity (ie, cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS]); (2) health care utilization; (3) overall survival (OS); and (4) event-free survival (EFS). We analyzed the association of age (65 to 74 years versus 75+ years) with toxicity and health care utilization using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. We examined the association of age with OS and EFS using multivariable Cox regression, controlling for covariates. The median patient age was 77 years (range, 75 to 91 years) in the 75+ year group and 69 years (ranges, 65 to 74 years) in the 65 to 74 year group. There were no statistically significant differences between the 75+ year group and the 65 to 74 year group in the rates of CRS (75.4% versus 84.2%; P = .21), grade 3+ CRS (1.5% versus 6.6%; P = .24), ICANS (38.5% versus 48.7%; P = .24), grade 3+ ICANS (16.9% versus 21.1%; P = .49), or infections (23.1% versus 29.0%; P = .45). There were no significant between-group differences in hospital readmissions within 30 days of CAR-T (10.8% versus 21.1%; P = .11), intensive care unit admissions within 30 days of CAR-T (7.7% versus 9.2%; P = 1.000), or median hospital length of stay (13 days versus 14 days; P = .29) among age groups. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis controlling for CAR-T product, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, lactate dehydrogenase level, bridging therapy use, and history of deep venous thromboembolism, age 75+ years was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR], .95; P = .86) or EFS (HR, 1.28; P = .30). We identified favorable OS and toxicity outcomes across age categories in older adults receiving CAR-T for B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma, underscoring that age alone is not a contraindication for CAR-T.

Revolutionizing gastric cancer treatment: The potential of immunotherapy

Gastric cancer, a prevalent malignancy worldwide, ranks sixth in terms of frequency and third in fatality, causing over a million new cases and 769000 annual deaths. Predominant in Eastern Europe and Eastern Asia, risk factors include family medical history, dietary habits, tobacco use, Helicobacter pylori, and Epstein-Barr virus infections. Unfortunately, gastric cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to a grim prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate below 5%. Surgical intervention, particularly with D2 Lymphadenectomy, is the mainstay for early-stage cases but offers limited success. For advanced cases, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapy. Emerging immunotherapy presents promise, especially for unresectable or metastatic cases, with strategies like immune checkpoint inhi-bitors, tumor vaccines, adoptive immunotherapy, and nonspecific immunomodulators. In this Editorial, with regards to the article "Advances and key focus areas in gastric cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive scientometric and clinical trial review", we address the advances in the field of immunotherapy in gastric cancer and its future prospects.

Information-Theoretic Analysis of a Model of CAR-4-1BB-Mediated NFκB Activation

Systems biology utilizes computational approaches to examine an array of biological processes, such as cell signaling, metabolomics and pharmacology. This includes mathematical modeling of CAR T cells, a modality of cancer therapy by which genetically engineered immune cells recognize and combat a cancerous target. While successful against hematologic malignancies, CAR T cells have shown limited success against other cancer types. Thus, more research is needed to understand their mechanisms of action and leverage their full potential. In our work, we set out to apply information theory on a mathematical model of NFκB signaling initiated by the CAR following antigen encounter. First, we estimated channel capacity for CAR-4-1BB-mediated NFκB signal transduction. Next, we evaluated the pathway's ability to distinguish contrasting "low" and "high" antigen concentration levels, depending on the amount of variability in protein concentrations. Finally, we assessed the fidelity by which NFκB activation reflects the encountered antigen concentration, depending on the prevalence of antigen-positive targets in tumor population. We found that in most scenarios, fold change in the nuclear concentration of NFκB carries a higher channel capacity for the pathway than NFκB's absolute response. Additionally, we found that most errors in transducing the antigen signal through the pathway skew towards underestimating the concentration of encountered antigen. Finally, we found that disabling IKKβ deactivation could increase signaling fidelity against targets with antigen-negative cells. Our information-theoretic analysis of signal transduction can provide novel perspectives on biological signaling, as well as enable a more informed path to cell engineering.Kindly check and confirm whether the corresponding affiliation is correctly identified.this is correct.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 2: Prevention and Management of Relapse Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been transformative in inducing and sustaining remission, relapse rates remain unacceptably high, with approximately 50% of children and young adults experiencing relapse within the first year postinfusion. Emerging strategies to extend the durability of remission involve the use of prognostic biomarkers to identify those at high risk of relapse or incorporate strategies aimed to enhancing functional CAR T cell persistence. Nonetheless, with antigen loss/down-regulation or evolution to lineage switch as major mechanisms of relapse, optimizing single antigen targeting alone is insufficient. Here, with a focus on relapse prevention strategies, including postinfusion surveillance and treatment approaches being explored to optimize post-CAR-T management (eg, combinatorial antigen targeting strategies, preemptive hematopoietic cell transplantation), we review the current state of the art in the prevention and management of post CAR-T relapse. We highlight the advancements in the field and identify gaps in the literature to guide future research in optimizing the prevention and management of post-CAR-T relapse in children and young adults with B-ALL.

Information-theoretic analysis of a model of CAR-4-1BB-mediated NFκB activation

Systems biology utilizes computational approaches to examine an array of biological processes, such as cell signaling, metabolomics and pharmacology. This includes mathematical modeling of CAR T cells, a modality of cancer therapy by which genetically engineered immune cells recognize and combat a cancerous target. While successful against hematologic malignancies, CAR T cells have shown limited success against other cancer types. Thus, more research is needed to understand their mechanisms of action and leverage their full potential. In our work, we set out to apply information theory on a mathematical model of cell signaling of CAR-mediated activation following antigen encounter. First, we estimated channel capacity for CAR-4-1BB-mediated NFκB signal transduction. Next, we evaluated the pathway's ability to distinguish contrasting "low" and "high" antigen concentration levels, depending on the amount of intrinsic noise. Finally, we assessed the fidelity by which NFκB activation reflects the encountered antigen concentration, depending on the prevalence of antigen-positive targets in tumor population. We found that in most scenarios, fold change in the nuclear concentration of NFκB carries a higher channel capacity for the pathway than NFκB's absolute response. Additionally, we found that most errors in transducing the antigen signal through the pathway skew towards underestimating the concentration of encountered antigen. Finally, we found that disabling IKKβ deactivation could increase signaling fidelity against targets with antigen-negative cells. Our information-theoretic analysis of signal transduction can provide novel perspectives on biological signaling, as well as enable a more informed path to cell engineering.

Metabolic Challenges in Anticancer CD8 T Cell Functions

Cancer immunotherapies continue to face numerous obstacles in the successful treatment of solid malignancies. While immunotherapy has emerged as an extremely effective treatment option for hematologic malignancies, it is largely ineffective against solid tumors due in part to metabolic challenges present in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor-infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells face fierce competition with cancer cells for limited nutrients. The strong metabolic suppression in the TME often leads to impaired T-cell recruitment to the tumor site and hyporesponsive effector functions via T-cell exhaustion. Growing evidence suggests that mitochondria play a key role in CD8⁺ T-cell activation, migration, effector functions, and persistence in tumors. Therefore, targeting the mitochondrial metabolism of adoptively transferred T cells has the potential to greatly improve the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies in treating solid malignancies.

Revamping the innate or innate-like immune cell-based therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: new mechanistic insights and advanced opportunities

A cancerous tumour termed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by inflammation and subsequently followed by end-stage liver disease and necrosis of the liver. The liver's continuous exposure to microorganisms and toxic molecules affects the immune response because normal tissue requires some immune tolerance to be safeguarded from damage. Several innate immune cells are involved in this process of immune system activation which includes dendritic cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells. The liver is an immunologic organ with vast quantities of innate and innate-like immune cells subjected to several antigens (bacteria, fungal or viral) through the gut-liver axis. Tumour-induced immune system engagement may be encouraged or suppressed through innate immunological systems, which are recognized promoters of liver disease development in pre-HCC conditions such as fibrosis or cirrhosis, ultimately resulting in HCC. Immune-based treatments containing several classes of drugs have transformed the treatment of several types of cancers in recent times. The effectiveness of such immunotherapies relies on intricate interactions between lymphocytes, tumour cells, and neighbouring cells. Even though immunotherapy therapy has already reported to possess potential effect to treat HCC, a clear understanding of the crosstalk between innate and adaptive immune cell pathways still need to be clearly understood for better exploitation of the same. The identification of predictive biomarkers, understanding the progression of the disease, and the invention of more efficient combinational treatments are the major challenges in HCC immunotherapy. The functions and therapeutic significance of innate immune cells, which have been widely implicated in HCC, in addition to the interplay between innate and adaptive immune responses during the pathogenesis, have been explored in the current review.

Immune therapy: a new therapy for acute myeloid leukemia

Although complete remission could be achieved in about 60%-70% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after conventional chemotherapy, relapse and the state of being refractory to treatment remain the main cause of death. In addition, there is a great need for less intensive regimens for all medically frail patients (both due to age/comorbidity and treatment-related). Immune therapy anticipates improved prognosis and reduced toxicities, which may offer novel therapeutic rationales. However, one of the major difficulties in developing immune therapies against AML is that the target antigens are also significantly expressed on healthy hematopoietic stem cells; B-cell malignancies are different because CD20/CD19/healthy B-cells are readily replaceable. Only the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab-ozogamicin is approved by the FDA for AML. Thus, drug development remains extremely active, although it is still in its infancy. This review summarizes the clinical results of immune therapeutic agents for AML, such as antibody-based drugs, chimeric antigen receptor therapy, checkpoint inhibitors, and vaccines.

Four-year follow-up of LCAR-B38M in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study in China (LEGEND-2)

Background

LCAR-B38M is a chimeric antigen receptor T cell product with two binding domains targeting B cell maturation antigen. Our previous reports showed a remarkable efficacy of LCAR-B38M in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) at a median follow-up of 2 years. Here, we report long-term safety and efficacy data from a median follow-up of 4 years.

Methods

LEGEND-2 was a phase 1, single-arm, open-label study conducted in four registered sites in China. Seventy-four participants with RRMM received LCAR-B38M treatment. Lymphodepletion was performed using cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine. LCAR-B38M, at a median dose of 0.513 × 10⁶ cells/kg, was intravenously administered either in three split infusions or in a single infusion. The primary objective was the safety of LCAR-B38M, and the secondary objective was efficacy.

Results

As of May 25, 2021, the median follow-up was 47.8 months. All patients experienced ≥ 1 adverse events (AEs). Grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in 45/74 (60.8%) patients. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 68/74 (91.9%) cases; 7 (9.5%) had grade ≥ 3 CRS. One patient experienced grade 1 central nervous system toxicity. The overall response rate was 87.8%. Fifty-four out of 74 (73.0%) patients achieved complete response. The median progression-free survival was 18.0 months, and the median overall survival for all patients was not reached. The median duration of response was 23.3 months. Four patients experienced viral infection more than 6 months post-infusion, and four patients developed second primary non-hematological malignancies at a median time of 11.5 months post-CAR-T cell transfer.

Conclusions

The 4-year follow-up data of LCAR-B38M therapy demonstrated a favorable long-term safety profile and a durable response in patients with RRMM.

Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03090659 (retrospectively registered on March 27, 2017); ChiCTR-ONH-17012285.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-022-01301-8.

Clinical determinants of relapse following CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancies: Coupling active strategies to overcome therapeutic limitations

The advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been hailed as a major breakthrough in the treatment of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While multiple promising CAR-T cell clinical trials continue to receive approval from the FDA and the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR), many hematologic malignancies patients nonetheless experience disease relapse following treatment as a consequence of genetic mutations, antigen escape, lineage switching, poor CAR-T cell persistence, CAR T cell exhaustion, and immunogenicity against CAR T cells. In this article, we summarize the structural characteristics of CAR constructs and discuss clinical factors known to be related to relapse following CAR-T cell treatment. By better understanding the mechanistic basis for such disease recurrence, it will be possible to fully realize the potential of this potent therapeutic modality in the future. This review will focus on current activate strategies aimed at overcoming known limitations to CAR-T cell therapy in an effort to improve hematologic malignancies patient outcomes.

Clinical experience of CAR T cell therapy in lymphomas

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in relapse portends a poor prognosis due to resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. Chimeric Antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been tested in many lymphomas in the relapse refractory setting and has resulted in durable responses despite some peculiar side effects including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NE), prolonged cytopenias and hypogammaglobulinemia. This review summarizes the registration trials conducted in lymphomas. All products showed response rates that were far better than obtainable by salvage chemotherapy and most patients recovered from side effects including CRS and NEs. The impact of CAR T in the real world setting was discussed as well as how to approach the use of CAR T in special circumstances such as CNS involvement, management of post CAR relapses and outpatient therapy.

Rethinking mechanisms of neurotoxicity with BCMA directed therapy

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has become a key target for antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and other immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. Some of these agents such as belantamab mafodotin and idecabtagene vicleucel have already received regulatory approval in the United States. Although BCMA has generally been considered to be expressed almost exclusively in plasma cells with a low likelihood of on-target off-tumor toxicity, there has been a range of unusual neurotoxicity observed across the spectrum of BCMA immunotherapies. In certain cases, these unusual neurotoxicity presentations have led to patient death or withdrawal of agents from further development. Our review summarizes the literature in this field and highlights the possibility of on-target toxicities due to neural expression of BCMA. We draw attention to the need for further investigation of these toxicities. This risk becomes increasingly important as BCMA targeted therapies are brought to earlier lines of treatment.

Intention to treat versus modified intention-to-treat analysis in B-cell maturation antigen and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) has revolutionised treatment of haematological malignancies; however, current reporting uses a modified intention-to-treat analysis (mITT) which over-estimates efficacy. We assessed what proportion of CD19 and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CART trials report the number of patients not receiving CART after being enrolled by performing meta-analysis of the mITT and intention-to-treat (iTT) overall response rate (ORR).

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched. All prospective clinical trials of CD19 and BCMA-targeting CART enrolling two or greater patients from 1st January 2013 to 1st November 2020 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 28 BCMA CART and 74 CD19 CART trials were identified. These included 10 BCMA CART (35.7%) and 52 (70.2%) CD19 CART trials reporting total number of patients enrolled and number of patients treated with CART. For this cohort of trials, the mITT ORR for BCMA CART was 78.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 67.0-89.0%), and the iTT ORR was 70.0% (95% CI = 59.0-80.0%). For CD19 leukaemia CART, the mITT ORR was 87.2% (95% CI = 83.1-91.2), and the iTT ORR was 74.9 (95% CI = 64.8-85.0). For CD19 lymphoma CART, the mITT ORR was 70.7% (95% CI = 63.9-77.5), and the iTT ORR was 58.7% (95% CI = 49.7-67.7).

CONCLUSION

Across BCMA and CD19 CART trials, there is a difference of up to 8-12% in the ORR between modified and iTT analyses and a paucity of information regarding reasons why patients did not receive the intended study treatment.

Traitement par cellules CAR-T : état des lieux de leur utilisation aux États-Unis en 2018

CAR-T THERAPY

CURRENT USE IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2018: Treatment with T-cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR T-cell therapy) has been a field of intense research in the United States since the 1980s. The recent approval in August 2017 of Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) opened the door to broader access to CAR T-cell therapy outside of clinical trials. Here, we aim to give the reader a practical summary of the current practices in the US when considering a patient for CAR T-cell therapy. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Les cellules CAR-T : une révolution thérapeutique ? réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel des partenaires Gilead : Kite et Celgene.

Insights into cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after CD19-specific CAR-T cell therapy

T-cells engineered to express CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CD19 CAR-T cells) can achieve high response rates in patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) CD19+ hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, the efficacy of CD19-specific CAR-T cell therapy can be offset by significant toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. In this report of our presentation at the 2018 Second French International Symposium on CAR-T cells (CAR-T day), we describe the clinical presentations of CRS and neurotoxicity in a cohort of 133 adults treated with CD19 CAR-T cells at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and provide insights into the mechanisms contributing to these toxicities.

Cancer immunotherapy beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors

Malignant cells have the capacity to rapidly grow exponentially and spread in part by suppressing, evading, and exploiting the host immune system. Immunotherapy is a form of oncologic treatment directed towards enhancing the host immune system against cancer. In recent years, manipulation of immune checkpoints or pathways has emerged as an important and effective form of immunotherapy. Agents that target cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are the most widely studied and recognized. Immunotherapy, however, extends beyond immune checkpoint therapy by using new molecules such as chimeric monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates that target malignant cells and promote their destruction. Genetically modified T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors are able to recognize specific antigens on cancer cells and subsequently activate the immune system. Native or genetically modified viruses with oncolytic activity are of great interest as, besides destroying malignant cells, they can increase anti-tumor activity in response to the release of new antigens and danger signals as a result of infection and tumor cell lysis. Vaccines are also being explored, either in the form of autologous or allogenic tumor peptide antigens, genetically modified dendritic cells that express tumor peptides, or even in the use of RNA, DNA, bacteria, or virus as vectors of specific tumor markers. Most of these agents are yet under development, but they promise to be important options to boost the host immune system to control and eliminate malignancy. In this review, we have provided detailed discussion of different forms of immunotherapy agents other than checkpoint-modifying drugs. The specific focus of this manuscript is to include first-in-human phase I and phase I/II clinical trials intended to allow the identification of those drugs that most likely will continue to develop and possibly join the immunotherapeutic arsenal in a near future.