Postoperative evaluation of patients with acromegaly: clinical significance and timing of oral glucose tolerance testing and measurement of (free) insulin-like growth factor I, acid-labile subunit, and growth hormone-binding protein levels

The characteristics of acromegalic patients with hyperprolactinemia and the differences in patients with merely GH-secreting adenomas: clinical analysis of 279 cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical data from a large cohort of acromegalic patients with and without hyperprolactinemia.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Between January 2002 and June 2010, a set of data on 279 acromegalic patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery was available. Based on preoperative GH and prolactin (PRL) levels, patients were divided into GH and GH+PRL groups. A stabilization or a further improvement of postoperative changes in clinical, hormonal, immunohistochemical, and magnetic resonance imaging parameters was observed in all patients throughout the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The GH group had significantly more coarse facial features, large hands and feet, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus compared with the GH+PRL group but significantly less menstrual disorders (13.8 vs 54.3%, P<0.001) and galactorrhea (3.1 vs 22.4%, P<0.001). The GH group had a higher age at diagnosis compared with the GH+PRL group (45.6 ± 13.9 vs 40.4 ± 11.4 years, P=0.001). The GH group had a smaller mean maximal diameter of the adenomas (2.2 ± 0.9 vs 2.6 ± 1.1 cm, P=0.004). There were no significant correlations between hormone levels and the immunohistochemical results. According to the criteria for hormonal cure of acromegaly, the surgical control rates in the GH and GH+PRL groups were 68.4 and 59.7% respectively (P=0.187). Tumor size was an important factor that affected the results of the operations. The rates of surgical control in GH and GH+PRL groups were 80.7 and 69.1% respectively (P=0.037), and the recurrence rates in the two groups were 7.1 and 11.3% respectively (P=0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with merely GH-secreting adenomas, acromegalic patients with hyperprolactinemia are characterized by an earlier onset of disease, lesser acromegalic features, lower GH levels, but larger tumor sizes, whereas in female patients, GH-PRL secreting adenomas are associated with higher incidences of menstrual disorders and galactorrhea.

Medical therapy of acromegaly

This paper outlines the present status of medical therapy of acromegaly. Indications for permanent postoperative treatment, postirradiation treamtent to bridge the interval until remission as well as primary medical therapy are elaborated. Therapeutic efficacy of the different available drugs-somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), dopamine agonists, and the GH antagonist Pegvisomant-is discussed, as are the indications for and efficacy of their respective combinations. Information on their mechanism of action, and some pharmakokinetic data are included. Special emphasis is given to the difficulties to define remission criteria of acromegaly due to technical assay problems. An algorithm for medical therapy in acromegaly is provided.

[Consensus on the change of criteria for cure of acromegaly during the last decade]

The Acromegaly Consensus Group redefined the consensus criteria for cure of acromegaly. 74 neurosurgeons and experienced endocrinologists summarized the latest results on diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. In this consensus statement the reliable growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 assays were established. Definition of disease control was discussed based on the available publications and evidence. This short communication summarizes the clinical aspects of consensus criteria for diagnosis and cure of acromegaly based on the original article.

Effects of GH assay standardization on evaluation of treatment outcomes for acromegaly in Japan

In Japan, the growth hormone (GH) assay has been standardized since April 2005 through use of a uniform recombinant human GH (rhGH) standard. Since then, GH values measured using the rhGH standard have been approximately 40% lower than previous values measured using kit standards based on the WHO standards for hGH of pituitary origin. However, the Japanese criteria for evaluating treatment outcomes for acromegaly have remained the same: a nadir GH during a 75 g OGTT <1 µg/L is considered cured, 1≤GH<2.5µg/L is considered inadequately controlled, and ≥2.5 µg/L is considered poorly controlled, instead of these levels were lowered to 60%, i.e. from 1 to 0.6 µg/L for cured and from 2.5 to 1.5µg/L for inadequately controlled (termed as "newly proposed criteria" in this study). We investigated the effects of standardization of the GH assay on the evaluation of post-surgical disease activity in 50 patients with acromegaly (M/F 19/31, 21-72 yr.). Post-surgical nadir GH levels during OGTT were positively correlated with the IGF-I SD score 3 months after TSS. Five of 6 patients whose post-surgical nadir GH levels ranged between 0.6 and 1 µg/L had normal serum IGF-I levels 3 months after TSS. Rates of improvement in glucose metabolism did not differ when patients were classified based on the present criteria vs. the newly proposed criteria. In conclusion, the current Japanese remission criteria for acromegaly still accurately reflect post-surgical disease activity in most patients, though long-term observation is still required.

The common consensus criteria have high predictive values for long-term postoperative acromegaly remission

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to retrospectively study the long-term reliability of the common consensus endocrinological criteria for the assessment of postoperative remission of acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 96 consecutive patients, surgical remission of acromegaly following transsphenoidal surgery was considered to be present when, without adjuvant treatment, 3 months postoperatively there was no clinical evidence of persisting disease, and, according to the common consensus criteria for acromegaly remission, GH was suppressed to < 1 μg/l during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) was within normal limits. The results of the second postoperative week, 3 months postoperative, and the most recent follow-up OGTT and IGF-1 measurements were used to calculate the positive and negative predictive values of the following endocrinological criteria of acromegaly remission: the common consensus criteria for acromegaly remission, GH suppression to < 1 μg/l during OGTT and IGF-1 within normal limits. Sensitive IRMA (≤ 0.3 μg/l) and RIA (≤ 32 μg/l) assays for GH and IGF-1 were used.

RESULTS

The surgical remission rate of acromegaly was 72.9%. At a median follow-up of 5.06 years, the recurrence rate of acromegaly was 2.08%. Overall, the common consensus criteria for acromegaly remission were the most reliable tests, with the following positive and negative predictive values at 2 weeks postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively and at the most recent follow-up: 68%, 100% and 100%, and 98%, 100% and 100%, respectively. The negative likelihood ratio confirmed that the test qualities of the common consensus criteria for acromegaly remission were superior to the other tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The common consensus criteria were the most reliable tests for the diagnosis of postoperative acromegaly remission. The positive and negative predictive values of the common consensus criteria for acromegaly remission increased from the second postoperative week to 3 months postoperatively, thereafter reliably indicating the long-term results of transsphenoidal surgery.

Acromegaly: a review of current medical therapy and new drugs on the horizon

Acromegaly is a disease that results from a growth hormone (GH)–secreting pituitary tumor. Clinically, the disease is characterized by excessive skeletal growth, soft tissue enlargement with disfigurement, and increased risk of cardiovascular death. The goals of treatment are the removal or reduction of the tumor mass via surgery and normalization of GH secretion. Another treatment goal is the preservation of normal pituitary function if possible. Transsphenoidal surgery by an experienced neurosurgeon is usually the first line of therapy, especially for small tumors. Surgeon expertise is crucial for outcome, with dedicated pituitary surgeons having better results. However, overall cure rates remain low because patients with these tumors usually present at an incurable stage. Therefore, medical therapy to control excess GH secretion plays a significant role in a large proportion of patients with acromegaly who are not cured by surgery or other forms of therapy, such as radiotherapy, and/or are awaiting the effects of radiotherapy. If surgery is not curative, lifelong monitoring and the control of excess GH is usually necessary by a care team experienced in handling this chronic disease. In the past decade major progress has occurred in the development of highly specific and selective pharmacological agents that have greatly facilitated more aggressive management of active acromegaly. Treatment approach should be individualized and take into consideration a patient's tumor size and location, symptoms, comorbid conditions, and preferences. Because a surgical cure can be difficult to achieve, all patients, even those with what seems to be a clinically and biochemically inactive disease, should undergo long-term biochemical testing and pituitary MR imaging.

Clinical laboratory indices in the treatment of acromegaly

Measurement of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-) is used to monitor the degree of improvement that occurs following treatment of patients with acromegaly. Improvement in GH assay sensitivity has led to changes in the definition of normal GH however many studies that assess the predictive value of GH were conducted in an era where assays were less sensitive. Other problems that have occurred with GH measurements include utilization of different standards and failure to prove commutability of commonly accepted standard. GH reference ranges vary in their quality and are not stratified for age, sex or body mass index. IGF-I measurements are associated with similar problems. They do not use a common standard that has been proven to be commutable and results can vary widely when the same specimens are assayed in different laboratories. Although age and sex stratified reference ranges exist, these do not always have adequate numbers of subjects and BMI adjusted ranges are not available. These problems have led to significant discordance in a significant number of patients wherein the IGF-I and GH values may yield a discrepant prediction of disease stabilization. In these cases in general the IGF-I values correlate better with the presence of persistent symptoms. Patients who fail to suppress GH to normal but have a normal IGF-I have to be monitored carefully for recurrence but usually do not require further therapy if they are asymptomatic. For the long term assessment of outcome and clinical disease activity measurement of both hormones is recommended.

A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The Acromegaly Consensus Group met in April 2009 to revisit the guidelines on criteria for cure as defined in 2000.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 74 neurosurgeons and endocrinologists with extensive experience of treating acromegaly. EVIDENCE/CONSENSUS PROCESS: Relevant assays, biochemical measures, clinical outcomes, and definition of disease control were discussed, based on the available published evidence, and the strength of consensus statements was rated.

CONCLUSIONS

Criteria to define active acromegaly and disease control were agreed, and several significant changes were made to the 2000 guidelines. Appropriate methods of measuring and achieving disease control were summarized.

Measurement of human growth hormone by immunoassays: current status, unsolved problems and clinical consequences

Measuring the concentration of growth hormone (GH) in blood samples taken during dynamic tests represents the basis for diagnosis of growth hormone related disorders, namely growth hormone deficiency and growth hormone excess. Today, a wide spectrum of immunoassays are in use, enabling rapid and sensitive determination of growth hormone concentrations in routine diagnostics. From a clinical point of view several difficulties exist with the use and interpretation of GH assay results in the assessment of GH related disorders: Many physiological factors such as fat mass, age and gender influence the outcome of dynamic tests, overall leading to significant inter-individual differences in GH responses. However, in addition to the physiological variability, considerable variability exists in GH assay results obtained by different immunoassays. Unfortunately, all the new technical advances in the field of GH measurement techniques have not reduced this methodological variability. To a large extent, the actual values reported for the GH concentration in a sample depend on the method used by the respective laboratory. Obviously, such discrepancies limit the applicability of consensus guidelines on diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice. This review summarizes current practices for GH measurement with respect to the methods used, their limitations and the clinical consequences of the existing heterogeneity in GH immunoassay results.

Monitoring of acromegaly: what should be performed when GH and IGF-1 levels are discrepant?

Monitoring of a patient with acromegaly requires periodic evaluation of levels of GH and IGF-1, the biochemical markers of this disease. Although the results of these two tests are usually concordant, they can be discrepant and how to proceed when they are can be a challenging clinical problem. In some cases, IGF-1 levels are normal yet GH suppression after oral glucose is abnormal; this pattern may be due to persistent GH dysregulation despite remission. In other cases, IGF-1 levels are elevated yet GH suppression appears to be normal; this pattern may be observed if the cutoff for GH suppression is inappropriately high for the GH assay being used. Various conditions known to alter GH and IGF-1 including malnutrition, thyroid disease and oestrogen use as well as the potential for methodological or normative data issues with the GH and IGF-1 assays should be considered in the interpretation of discrepant results. When a known cause of the discrepancy other than acromegaly is not identified, a clinical decision about the patient's therapy needs to be made. We adjust treatment in most patients whose results are discrepant based on the IGF-1 level, continuing current treatment if it is persistently normal or modifying this if it is elevated. The clinical picture of the patient, however, also needs to be incorporated into this decision. All patients should have continued periodic surveillance of both GH and IGF-1 levels.

Efficacy of the new long-acting formulation of lanreotide (lanreotide Autogel) in somatostatin analogue-naive patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of lanreotide autogel (ATG) 120 mg injections every 4-8 weeks in somatostatin analogue-naïve patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN

Open, non-comparative, phase III, multicenter clinical study.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (28 women, aged 19-78 yr): 39 newly diagnosed (de novo) and 12 who had previously undergone unsuccessful surgery (post-op, 11 macro and 1 micro) were studied. ATG 120 mg was initially given every 8 weeks for 24 weeks and subsequently changed according to GH levels: if <or=2.5 microg/l every 8 weeks (group A, 17 patients); if 2.5-5 microg/l every 6 weeks (group B, 15 patients); and if >5 microg/l every 4 weeks (group C, 19 patients). Treatment duration was 48-52 weeks. The primary objective was to control GH and IGF-I levels (GH<or=2.5 microg/l and IGF-I normalized for age/gender). Secondary objectives were to assess GH, IGF-I, and acid-labile subunit (ALS) decrease, improvement of clinical symptoms and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

GH levels normalized in 32 patients (63%), similarly in de novo and post-op patients (72% vs 50%, p=0.48); in 100% of group A, in 73% of group B and in 21% of group C (p<0.0001). IGF-I levels normalized in 19 patients (37%), similarly in the de novo and post-op patients (33% vs 50%, p=0.48): in 65% of group A, 33% of group B, and in 16% of group C. Circulating GH levels decreased by 80+/-17%, IGF-I levels by 44+/-27%, and ALS by 30+/-17%. Symptoms (hyperhidrosis (68.6%), swelling (68.6%), asthenia (58.8%), spine arthralgia (54.9%), and paresthesias (52.9%) and QoL (from 9.1+/-7.9 to 6.1+/-6.6) significantly improved (p<0.001). No patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events (AE). The most frequent AE was diarrhea (76.2% of patients): at study end 16 mild and 1 moderate diarrhea were recorded. Gallstones developed in 12% of patients.

CONCLUSION

ATG 120 mg in somatostatin-naïve patients with acromegaly controls GH secretion in 63% and IGF-I secretion in 37% during a 48-52 week period without any difference between de novo and post-op patients. The treatment was associated with improvement in clinical symptoms and QoL and with a good, safe profile.

Exogenous insulin treatment after hypofractionated radiotherapy in cats with diabetes mellitus and acromegaly

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for feline acromegaly has yet to be established. Surgical and medical therapies are minimally effective although radiotherapy might have greater efficacy. The purpose of this study was to review the response and outcome of cats with acromegaly and insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus (DM) to radiotherapy.

HYPOTHESES

That radiotherapy improves glycemic control in cats with acromegaly and that improved glycemic control is due to remission of clinical acromegaly; demonstrated by a fall in serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations.

ANIMALS

Fourteen cats with naturally occurring acromegaly.

METHODS

Retrospective case review; records of all cats treated for acromegaly with radiotherapy were reviewed from 1997 to 2008. Cats were selected on the basis of compatible clinical signs, laboratory features, and diagnostic imaging findings. Fourteen cats received radiotherapy, delivered in 10 fractions, 3 times a week to a total dose of 3,700 cGy.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 14 cats had improved diabetic control after radiotherapy. These improvements were sustained for up to 60 months. DM progressed in 2 cats and 1 did not respond. Seven cats responded before the final treatment. Ten cats were euthanized, 1 as a consequence of radiotherapy. In 8 cats in which IGF-1 was measured after treatment, changes in its concentration did not reflect the clinical improvement in glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Radiotherapy represents an effective treatment for cats with insulin-resistant DM resulting from acromegaly. IGF-1 concentration after treatment does not provide a suitable method by which remission from either acromegaly or insulin-resistant DM may be assessed.

Cryohypophysectomy used in the treatment of a case of feline acromegaly

A 10-year-old female spayed cat was diagnosed with acromegaly secondary to a pituitary tumour. At the time of diagnosis, the cat had insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus and its insulin-like growth factor-I levels were elevated. Clinical signs included polyuria, polydipsia and weight gain. Persistent hyperglycaemia and glucosuria were identified, and fructosamine levels remained elevated. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a pituitary tumour. Transsphenoidal cryohypophysectomy was used to treat the pituitary tumour. Postoperatively, the serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels decreased and the diabetes mellitus was controlled with routine levels of insulin. To the authors' knowledge, this is the second reported case of acromegaly treated with cryohypophysectomy, and the first that reports a favourable long-term outcome. Cryohypophysectomy may be a safe and effective treatment for cats with a pituitary mass resulting in acromegaly.

Preliminary data on biochemical remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analogs withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

It is still unknown whether prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSTa) may cause a long-lasting disease remission in GH-secreting adenomas after drug discontinuation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the evolution of GH/IGF-I secretion and tumor mass after SSTa withdrawal in patients affected by acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

A total of 27 patients with acromegaly (12 de novo and 15 previously operated) were treated with SSTa for a median period of 48 months and considered optimally controlled in hormonal and neuroradiological terms. None of them were previously irradiated.

METHODS

Basal GH, post-glucose GH nadir, IGF-I, clinical signs/symptoms, and metabolic parameters were evaluated after 12-16 weeks from drug withdrawal. Only patients who met the current criteria for disease remission remained in drug suspension being periodically re-evaluated for biochemical/clinical data and neuroradiological imaging.

RESULTS

After 12-16 weeks withdrawal, 15 of the 27 patients had disease relapse and restarted SSTa, while 12 were considered 'in disease remission' (44% of total). Glucose metabolism improved in both euglycemic and diabetic patients after short-term SSTa discontinuation. Only one of the ten patients who reached 24 weeks withdrawal showed biochemical disease recurrence. On the whole, five of the patients still in remission after 6 months have already prolonged the follow-up over 12 months (median: 24 months), without clinical and biochemical/neuroradiological evidence of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data indicate a successful withdrawal of SSTa at least in a subset of well-responsive patients with acromegaly and challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is always a lifelong requirement.

Efficacy of a slow-release formulation of lanreotide (Autogel) 120 mg) in patients with acromegaly previously treated with octreotide long acting release (LAR): an open, multicentre longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg (ATG120; Ipsen S.p.A, Milan, Italy) is a high-dose, sustained-release aqueous gel formulation, supplied in a prefilled syringe and given by deep subcutaneous injection. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of ATG120 given every 4-8 weeks with those of octreotide LAR (o-LAR) given every 4 weeks. DESIGN PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A phase III multicentre Italian open clinical study of 23 acromegalic patients (15 female, 8 male). All patients had received o-LAR for 6-18 months and, after 3 months wash out, ATG120 was given every 6 weeks for a total of four injections (Period 1). Then the interval between ATG120 injections was adjusted according to three different schemes: every 4, 6 or 8 weeks depending on GH levels (GH > 2.5 microg/l; 1 < GH <or= 2.5 microg/l; GH <or= 1 microg/l, respectively). ATG120 was given for a further two to three doses, with a final assessment (Period 2) at Week 34, 36 or 42.

MEASUREMENTS

Hormonal (GH and IGF-I) and clinical efficacy and tolerability.

RESULTS

ATG120 induced a significant GH decrease from 9.9 +/- 11.3 at baseline (Visit 1) to 3.5 +/- 5.7 at the end of Period 1 (P < 0.01) and to 3.8 +/- 5.7 microg/l at the final visit (P < 0.01). IGF-I also decreased from 544 +/- 312 at baseline (Visit 1) to 318 +/- 181 at Period 1 and to 356 +/- 187 microg/l at the final visit (both P < 0.05 vs. baseline). The frequency of ATG120 administrations was adjusted to every 4 weeks in 12 patients, every 6 weeks in 4 patients and every 8 weeks in 6 patients; 1 patient withdrew before the dose adjustment. Serum GH and IGF-I achieved at the end of Period 1 and Period 2 were similar to those reached with o-LAR. The number of patients who achieved GH < 2.5 microg/l was comparable between o-LAR (43%) and ATG120 at Period 1 (48%) and at Period 2 (62%). Normal IGF-I levels were recorded in 8 patients during o-LAR (35%), 11 during ATG Period 1 (48%) and 10 at the final visit (43%). Last, 4 patients showed a better response to ATG120 and 2 to o-LAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for acromegaly. In approximately half of patients ATG120 may be administered every 6-8 weeks, instead of every 4 weeks, without lost of efficacy.

Reference values for serum levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and their ratio in Chinese adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To establish the reference values for serum levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 and their ratio in Chinese adolescents aged 12-19 years.

DESIGN AND METHODS

2102 Chinese adolescents were randomly selected from all secondary schools in Hong Kong with 1734 having IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels as measured by automated chemiluminescent assays (IMMULITE 2000). LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) method was used to generate reference percentile curves for IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their ratio.

RESULTS

After excluding participants with abnormal thyroid function, 798 boys and 894 girls were included in the analysis with a mean (+/-SD) age of 15.3 (+/-2.0) and 15.7 years (+/-2.0), respectively. Both serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels tended to be higher in girls than boys before the age of 16. In boys, there was progressive decline in IGF-1 after a pubertal peak at the age of 13-14. In girls, there was a similar decline after the age of 12. In both boys and girls, there was progressive age-dependent decline in IGFBP-3 after the age of 15-16. The pattern of changes for IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio was similar to that of the IGF-1 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These reference values of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in healthy adolescents should facilitate the clinical management of adolescents with GH-IGF axis disorders.

Ensaios para a medida de hormônio do crescimento (GH) e IGF-I: aspectos metodológicos e suas implicações no diagnóstico e seguimento da acromegalia

A dosagem do GH no soro é essencial para confirmar ou excluir o seu excesso. Na acromegalia, a ausência de critérios clínicos suficientemente sensíveis para monitorizar o sucesso do tratamento faz com que o GH sérico seja o procedimento de escolha e, para isso, é essencial que a sua dosagem seja realizada de forma confiável, capaz de permitir interpretações uniformes. Vários critérios hormonais têm sido propostos para caracterizar remissão da acromegalia, incluindo níveis séricos de GH randômico inferior a 2,5 µg/l, nadir de GH durante o teste de tolerância oral a glicose inferior a 1,0 µg/l e IGF-I normal para sexo e idade. A importância do tratamento adequado consiste na possibilidade de reverter a mortalidade prematura da acromegalia através da diminuição dos níveis de GH para valores menores que 2,5 µg/l. Com o surgimento de ensaios ultra-sensíveis para medida do GH, tornaram-se necessários critérios mais estritos para determinar cura ou remissão da doença. Nesta revisão, descreveremos aqui as modificações decorrentes da evolução dos ensaios, as conseqüências nos resultados de GH e os pontos de corte propostos na literatura para caracterização da atividade e remissão da acromegalia.

Value of insulin-like growth factor system markers in the assessment of growth hormone status

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has been measured extensively in a variety of clinical settings. Total IGF-I frequently is used to assess the clinical impact of disorders of GH secretion and to monitor patients' response to therapy. It does not have sufficient precision to be used as a stand-alone test in the diagnosis of GH deficiency. Free IGF-I, IGF binding protein-3, or acid-labile subunit may provide useful information regarding GH secretion in specific conditions but are not superior to IGF-I for making the diagnosis of GH deficiency or acromegaly.

Gender, body weight, disease activity, and previous radiotherapy influence the response to pegvisomant

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

To effectively normalize IGF-I in patients with acromegaly, various covariates may affect dosing and plasma concentrations of pegvisomant. We assessed whether sex, age, weight, and previous radiotherapy influence dosing of pegvisomant in patients with active disease.

DESIGN

Data from 69 men and 49 women participating in multicenter, open-label trials of pegvisomant were retrospectively evaluated using multiple regression techniques. Sixty-nine subjects (39 men, 30 women) had undergone external beam pituitary radiotherapy. Serum IGF-I was at least 30% above age-related upper limit of normal in all patients at study entry. After a loading dose of pegvisomant (80 mg), patients were commenced on 10 mg/d. Pegvisomant dose was adjusted by 5 mg every eighth week until serum IGF-I was normalized.

RESULTS

At baseline, men had significantly higher mean serum IGF-I levels than women despite similar GH levels. After treatment with pegvisomant, IGF-I levels were similar in men and women. A significant correlation between baseline GH, IGF-I, body weight, and the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I was observed (all P < 0.001). Women required an average of 0.04 mg/kg more pegvisomant than men and a mean weight-corrected dose of 19.2 mg/d to normalize serum IGF-I [14.5 mg/d (men); P < 0.001]. Patients treated with radiotherapy required less pegvisomant to normalize serum IGF-I despite similar baseline GH/IGF-I levels (15.2 vs. 18.5 mg/d for no previous radiotherapy; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, body weight, previous radiotherapy, and baseline GH/IGF-I influence the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I in patients with active acromegaly.

Serum IGF-I levels in the diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) is a reliable marker of disease activity and growth hormone (GH) status in acromegaly, but its clinical utility has been hampered over the years by various issues including a lack of robust reference range data and variability in assay sensitivity and specificity. In acromegaly IGF-I correlates well with GH activity and nadir GH on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and is the most sensitive and specific test in diagnosis, where serum IGF-I is persistently seen to be elevated to a range that is distinct from that in healthy individuals. However it should not be relied on exclusively for diagnosis or used as the sole indication of disease severity and GH burden. Successful medical or surgical treatment of acromegaly is usually associated with normalisation of serum IGF-I but there is discordance between GH and IGF-I in some patients. Patients with a normal IGF-I but an abnormal GH suppression to OGTT are at risk of relapse and therefore it should not be used alone to establish disease remission. In contrast to the diagnosis of acromegaly, there is also considerable overlap in serum IGF-I with normality after primary treatment of disease, even in the presence of persisting GH excess. Gender, age and prior radiotherapy alters the relationship between GH and IGF-I and reliance on one marker of disease activity such as IGF-I is particularly precarious in certain disease states. However an elevated serum IGF-I has been shown to be associated with excess mortality and normalising IGF-I normalises mortality making it a useful marker. The tightening up of the assays means that establishing absolute concentrations as well as standard deviation scores are essential to allow cross-study comparisons. This becomes especially important in the use of Pegvisomant, where IGF-I becomes the sole biochemical marker of disease activity.

Serum insulin-like growth factor-I measurement in the follow-up of treated acromegaly: Comparison of four immunoassays

BACKGROUND

Measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is currently used for the diagnosis and for monitoring treated acromegaly. In this work, we have studied the performances of four IGF-1 immunoassays in the follow-up of acromegaly.

METHODS

The study was carried out on 52 sera from 40 patients with treated acromegaly. Serum IGF-I was measured with radioimmunoassays from Immunotech, DiaSorin and Schering Laboratories and by the chemiluminescent automated immunoassay (Advantage) from Nichols. Normal age- and gender-matched subjects constituted the reference population for two assays.

RESULTS

Deming regression and Bland-Altman analyses showed a high correlation with the four methods tested. The use of restricted number of age-adjusted controls with the Immunotech assay, the DiaSorin assay and the Schering assay induced discordance with the Nichols assay in the interpretation of results in treated acromegaly. When normal ranges of the Immunotech assay and the DiaSorin assay were defined from large number of controls, the frequency of normal IGF-I became similar as that obtained with the Nichols assay.

CONCLUSION

The four immunoassays display suitable analytical performance for serum IGF-I measurement in the follow-up of acromegaly. For correct interpretation, IGF-I normal ranges should be defined in a large number of age-adjusted healthy subjects.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of acromegaly

Active acromegaly can be treated effectively by transsphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment in the form of somatostatin analogs and growth hormone receptor antagonists. Many patients will require a combination of treatment modalities to normalize growth hormone excess and associated increased mortality, and to improve comorbidity. Following postoperative radiotherapy, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels gradually decrease and normalization of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I is achieved in 50% of patients after 5 years and 75% after 10 years. Disadvantages of radiotherapy include the long interval until hormone levels have sufficiently decreased and the high incidence of radiation-induced hypopituitarism. Radiotherapy was associated with increased mortality in some but not other studies. Limitations in the design and confounding factors, such as years spent with active disease and changing treatment strategies, make it impossible to draw conclusions on this topic. Gamma knife radiosurgery may combine faster decline of growth hormone excess with a lower incidence of hypopituitarism in eligible cases, but long-term results of this radiation technique are lacking. At present, patients will preferentially be treated by primary surgery and/or somatostatin analog treatment, followed, if necessary, by growth hormone receptor antagonist treatment, while radiotherapy is reserved for selected cases only. The indications for radiotherapy and radiosurgery need to be revisited in the near future, when longer follow-up results for medical treatment and radiosurgery have become available. This review summarizes the recent literature on efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly and discusses the place of radiation treatment in the treatment algorithm of acromegaly.

Dynamic tests and basal values for defining active acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by excess secretion of growth hormone (GH), usually from a pituitary somatotrope adenoma. The prevalence of acromegaly is 38-40 cases/1,000,000 subjects, while the annual incidence is 3 new cases/1,000,000 subjects. The increase in morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly is the result of GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I oversecretion and the direct mass effect of the pituitary tumor. Once the disease is clinically suspected, laboratory evaluation is mandatory to establish diagnosis. The standard method for the diagnosis of acromegaly has been the measuring of GH nadir (GHn) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) which in normal individuals is undetectable, while acromegalics failed to suppress GH levels. Determination of IGF-I levels is useful as they correlate with clinical features of acromegaly and with the 24-hour mean GH levels. According to the more recent consensus, a random GH <0.4 microg/l and IGF-I in the age- and gender-matched normal range exclude the diagnosis of acromegaly. If either of these levels are not achieved, an OGTT should be performed, and then GHn <1 microg/l during OGTT excludes acromegaly. The therapeutic goals for acromegaly include the relief of sings and symptoms, the control of the tumor mass, the correction of the biochemical markers to normal levels, and the reduction in morbidity and mortality to the expected rate for the normal population. According to the 2000 consensus criteria, biochemical control of acromegaly is achieved when circulating IGF-I is reduced to an age- and sex-adjusted normal range and GHn during OGTT is <1 microg/l. There is debate in the literature whether GHn or IGF-I levels are more reliable to evaluate treatment of acromegaly. It has been reported that 15% of acromegalics with GHn <1 microg/l after treatment demonstrate abnormal IGF-I levels, while 15% of patients with normal IGF-I fail to suppress GH levels <1 microg/l during the OGTT. Probably, GHn and IGF-I levels represent two different aspects of disease activity in acromegaly. While IGF-I evaluates the secretory function of the somatotropes, GHn provides evidence of the presence or absence of functional autonomy of these cells.