Overweight/Obese adults with pituitary disorders require lower peak growth hormone cutoff values on glucagon stimulation testing to avoid overdiagnosis of growth hormone deficiency

Hypopituitarism in Traumatic Brain Injury-A Critical Note

While hypopituitarism after traumatic brain injury (TBI) was previously considered rare, it is now thought to be a major cause of treatable morbidity among TBI survivors. Consequently, recommendations for assessment of pituitary function and replacement in TBI were recently introduced. Given the high incidence of TBI with more than 100 pr. 100,000 inhabitants, TBI would be by far the most common cause of hypopituitarism if the recently reported prevalence rates hold true. The disproportion between this proposed incidence and the occasional cases of post-TBI hypopituitarism in clinical practice justifies reflection as to whether hypopituitarism has been unrecognized in TBI patients or whether diagnostic testing designed for high risk populations such as patients with obvious pituitary pathology has overestimated the true risk and thereby the disease burden of hypopituitarism in TBI. The findings on mainly isolated deficiencies in TBI patients, and particularly isolated growth hormone (GH) deficiency, raise the question of the potential impact of methodological confounding, determined by variable test-retest reproducibility, appropriateness of cut-off values, importance of BMI stratified cut-offs, assay heterogeneity, pre-test probability of hypopituitarism and lack of proper individual laboratory controls as reference population. In this review, current recommendations are discussed in light of recent available evidence.

The robustness of diagnostic tests for GH deficiency in adults

Since the 1970s, GH treatment has been an important tool in paediatric endocrinology for the management of growth retardation. It is now accepted that adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD) demonstrate impaired physical and psychological well-being and may benefit from replacement therapy with recombinant human GH. There is, however, an ongoing debate on how to diagnose GHD, especially in adults. A GH response below the cut-off limit of a GH-stimulation test is required in most cases for establishing GHD in adults. No 'gold standard' GH-stimulation test exists, but some GH stimulation tests may be more robust to variations in patient characteristics such as age and gender, as well as to pre-test conditions like heat exposure due to a hot bath or bicycling. However, body mass index (BMI) is negatively associated with GH-responses to all available GH-stimulation tests and glucocorticoid treatment, including conventional substitution therapy, influences the GH-responses. Recently, the role of IGF-I measurements in the clinical decision making has been discussed. The aim of this review is to discuss the available GH-stimulation tests. In this author's opinion, tests which include growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) tend to be more potent and robust, especially the GHRH+arginine test which has been proven to be of clinical use. In contrast, the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and the glucagon test appear to have too many drawbacks.

The complex relationship between obesity and the somatropic axis: the long and winding road

Despite the considerable body of evidence pointing to a possible relationship between the state of the adipose tissue depots and regulation of the somatotropic axis, to date the relationship between obesity and low growth hormone (GH) status remains incompletely understood. The low GH status in obesity is mainly considered as a functional condition, largely reversible after a sustained weight loss. Moreover, due to the effects of the adiposity on the regulation of the somatotropic axis, the application of GH stimulation tests in obesity may also lead to an incorrect diagnosis of GH deficieny (GHD). On the other hand, similar to patients with GHD unrelated to obesity, the reduced GH response to stimulation testing in obese individuals is associated with increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and detrimental alterations of body composition, which contribute to worsening their cardio-metabolic risk profile. In addition, the reduced GH secretion may result in reduced serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels, and the concordance of low peak GH and low IGF-1 identifies a subset of obese individuals with high cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, after weight loss, the normalization of the GH response and IGF-1 levels may or may not occur, and in patients undergoing bariatric surgery the persistence of a low GH status may affect the post-operative outcomes. In this review, we will provide an overview on some clinically relevant aspects of the relationship between obesity axis and the somatotropic axis in the light of the recently published research.