Progression while receiving preoperative chemotherapy should not be an absolute contraindication to liver resection for colorectal metastases

Tumor progression during preoperative chemotherapy predicts failure to complete 2-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 130 patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and long-term results of 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH) in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective multicenter study including 4 Italian hepatobiliary surgery units. One hundred thirty patients were selected for TSH between 2002 and 2011. The primary endpoint was feasibility of TSH and analysis of factors associated with failure to complete the procedure. The secondary endpoint was the long-term survival analysis.

RESULTS

Patients presented with synchronous CRLM in 80.8% of cases, with a mean number of 8.3 CRLM and with concomitant extrahepatic disease in 20.0% of cases. The rate of failure to complete TSH was 21.5% and tumor progression was the most frequent reason for failure (18.5% of cases). Primary tumor characteristics, type, number, and distribution of CRLM were not associated with significantly different risks of disease progression. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that tumor progression during prehepatectomy chemotherapy was the only independent risk factor for failure to complete TSH. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for patients who completed TSH were 32.1% and 24.1%, respectively, with a median survival of 43 months. Duration of prehepatectomy chemotherapy ≥6 cycles was found to be the only independent predictor of overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that selection of patients by response to prehepatectomy chemotherapy may be extremely important before planning TSH because tumor progression while receiving prehepatectomy chemotherapy was associated with significantly higher risk of failure to complete the second stage. For patients who completed the TSH strategy, long-term outcomes can be achieved with results similar to those observed after single-stage hepatectomy.

Early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: risk factors, prognosis, and treatment. A LiverMetSurvey-based study of 6,025 patients

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to assess the risk of early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases (CRLM) and its prognostic value; identify early recurrence predictive factors; clarify the effect of perioperative chemotherapy on its occurrence; and elucidate the best early recurrence management.

METHODS

Patients of the LiverMetSurvey registry who underwent complete liver resection (R0/R1) between 1998 and 2009 were reviewed. Early recurrence was defined as any recurrence that occurred within 6 months after resection.

RESULTS

A total of 6,025 patients were included; 2,734 (45.4 %) had recurrence, including 639 (10.6 %) early recurrences. Early recurrence was mainly hepatic (59.5 vs. 54.4 % for late recurrences; p = 0.023). Independent risk factors of early recurrence were: T3-4 primary tumor (p = 0.0002); synchronous CRLM (p = 0.0001); >3 CRLM (p < 0.0001); 0-mm margin liver resection (p = 0.003); and associated intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (p = 0.0005). Response to preoperative chemotherapy (complete/partial) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy reduced early recurrence risk (p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Intraoperative ultrasonography reduced hepatic early recurrence rate (p = 0.025). Early recurrence negatively affected prognosis: 5-year survival 26.9 versus 49.4 % for the late recurrence group (p < 0.0001, median follow-up 34.4 months). Overall, 234 (36.6 %) patients with early recurrence underwent re-resection. These patients had survival rates higher than non-re-resected patients (5-year survival 47.2 vs. 8.9 %; p < 0.0001) and similar to re-resected patients for late recurrence (48.7 %). Chemotherapy before early recurrence resection improved later survival (5-year survival 61.5 vs. 43.7 %; p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Early recurrence risk is enhanced for extensive disease after poor preoperative disease control and inadequate surgical treatment, but is reduced after adjuvant chemotherapy. Although early recurrence negatively affects prognosis, re-resection may restore better survival. Chemotherapy before early recurrence resection is advocated.

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Pro primary surgery]

Approximately 50 % of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases, with the liver being the only site of metastasis in the majority of patients. Liver resection is the standard treatment of CRC liver metastases as it achieves a 5-year survival of 36-51 %. The primary goal in the treatment of non-resectable liver metastases is to achieve resectability by preoperative chemotherapy as even secondary liver resection after down-sizing is associated with improved overall survival. Furthermore, resectability can be increased by two-stage surgical procedures; however, the assessment of resectability varies widely even among experts in the field. In cases of suspected non-resectability patients should therefore be liberally admitted for a second opinion to centers of liver surgery. Perioperative chemotherapy in primarily resectable cases has only demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival in subgroup analyses. Moreover, modern potent chemotherapy regimens increase the surgical morbidity depending on the duration of treatment: the lower the histological response of the metastases and the more treatment cycles are applied, the higher is the parenchymal damage with related surgical morbidity. Therefore, perioperative chemotherapy of resectable liver metastases should be viewed with caution and should not be considered the standard of care.

The effect of hepatic steatosis on survival following resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients without preoperative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic steatosis, a common condition associated with insulin resistance and excess body weight, is reported to be associated with an increased risk for perioperative mortality in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but its impact upon longterm survival is less well documented.

METHODS

The effects of background liver pathology, categorized as 'normal', 'with steatosis' and 'other', on perioperative mortality, overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed in patients undergoing resection for CLM according to data maintained in the LiverMetSurvey database. As preoperative chemotherapy may confound the effects of steatosis, patients who had been given preoperative chemotherapy were excluded. Survival analyses included log-rank tests for comparisons, and multivariate Cox models, including well-established prognosticators.

RESULTS

Of 5853 patients who underwent first-time liver resection without preoperative chemotherapy, 1793 (30.6%) had background steatosis. Rates of 90-day perioperative mortality in patients with normal, steatosis and other pathologies were 2.8%, 2.1% and 4.9%, respectively. Steatosis was associated with improved 5-year OS (47.4% versus 43.0%; log rank, P = 0.0017) and CSS (56.1% versus 50.3%; P = 0.002) compared with normal background liver. After adjustments, the survival advantage associated with steatosis remained (hazard ratio = 0.806, 95% confidence interval 0.717-0.905 for CSS).

DISCUSSION

The paradoxical survival advantage observed in patients with steatosis undergoing liver resection for CLM generates a hypothesis that peri-diagnosis of excess body adiposity has a survival protective effect that warrants further research.

Assessment of chemotherapy response in colorectal liver metastases in patients undergoing hepatic resection and the correlation to pathologic residual viable tumor

BACKGROUND

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), which evaluates maximum tumor diameter only, is commonly used to determine response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Limitations of RECIST include its inability to assess the changes in tumor enhancement. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of these criteria as well as the modified RECIST (mRECIST) with pathologic tumor response. A novel semi-automated volumetric assessment of tumor size was also investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of a 1,948-patient prospective hepatic database to assess response and pathologic criteria was performed. Patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy before hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases were reviewed. Radiographic responses according to RECIST and mRECIST were determined. The percentage of viable tumor cells compared with the total tumor area was determined from the pathologic specimens.

RESULTS

We identified 38 patients with adequate imaging who had undergone anatomic hepatic resection and full pathologic evaluation. The percentages of residual viable tumor in the resected specimens were significantly different across RECIST categories (p = 0.045), but not mRECIST (p = 0.305). For mRECIST, there were improved and significant linear trends for residual viable tumor, necrosis, and necrosis + fibrosis when compared with RECIST (p = 0.056). Neither RECIST nor mRECIST responses were predictive of residual viable tumor burden in regression analyses. A novel semi-automated volumetric assessment of tumor size correlated well with pathologic tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither RECIST nor mRECIST were predictive of residual viable burden, although the linear trend for mRECIST and residual necrosis + fibrosis compared favorably with RECIST. Continued evaluation for tumor enhancement and standardization of tumor size remain a critical unmet need in patients with solid organ disease.