Automated 22-kD growth hormone-specific assay without interference from Pegvisomant

Circulating levels of pegvisomant and endogenous growth hormone during prolonged pegvisomant therapy in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly induces gradual elevations in endogenous serum growth hormone (GH) levels and whether serum pegvisomant levels predict the therapeutic outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (6 women), mean age 46·3 years (range: 23·2-76·2), were studied. For each patient, four hospital visits were identified including 'active disease' (no treatment) and last follow-up. At each visit, 12 blood samples were drawn during 3 h including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Eight patients received a somatostatin analogue in addition to pegvisomant on the last visit.

RESULTS

Median (range) pegvisomant doses (mg/day) were 10 (10-10), 15 (10-15) and 15 (10-15) at visits 2, 3 and 4, respectively, and the mean duration of pegvisomant treatment was 17·5 ± 3·2 (SEM) months. Serum IGF-I changed significantly during the treatment period with the highest level at baseline and lowest levels at visits 3 and 4. GH levels increased in a dose-dependent manner during pegvisomant treatment and decreased at visit 4. Changes in IGF-I levels correlated negatively with changes in serum pegvisomant levels between visits. Serum pegvisomant at each visit correlated with baseline growth hormone levels, whereas no associations between serum pegvisomant and either dose, gender, age or body weight were found.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Serum GH levels increased initially, but remained stable during prolonged pegvisomant treatment in patients with acromegaly, (2) serum pegvisomant levels predicted the reduction in serum IGF-I during treatment and (3) the interindividual variation in serum pegvisomant levels seems not predicted by either age, gender or body composition.

Gaps in the Traceability Chain of Human Growth Hormone Measurements

BACKGROUND

Human growth hormone (hGH) is measured for the diagnosis of secretion disorders. These measurements fall under the EU Directive 98/79/EC on in vitro diagnostic medical devices requiring traceability of commercial calibrator values to higher-order reference materials or procedures (Off J Eur Communities 1998 Dec 7;L 331:1–37). External quality assessment schemes show large discrepancies between results from different methods, even though most methods provide results traceable to the recommended International Standard (IS 98/574). The aim of this study was to investigate possible causes for these discrepancies.

METHODS

We investigated the commutability and recovery of hGH in reconstituted IS 98/574. We tested different reconstitution protocols and used 4 different serum matrices for spiking. These IS preparations were measured together with serum samples. We quantified hGH by 5 different methods in 4 different laboratories.

RESULTS

Results from the different methods correlated well for the serum samples. Mean discrepancies between results from different methods were ≤20%. None of the IS preparations was commutable for all the method comparisons. The recovery of hGH in preparations of IS 98/574 depended on the reconstitution protocol (>10-fold differences) and BACKGROUND matrix (relative differences ≤17% for different serum matrices).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of different protocols for reconstitution and spiking of hGH reference preparations affects quantification by immunoassays, potentially leading to a bias between commercial methods, despite the use of calibrators with values claimed to be traceable to the same higher-order reference material.

Detecting and solving the interference of pregnancy serum, in a GH immunometric assay

BACKGROUND

High homology of GH with placental GH (pGH) and hPL frequently resulted in falsely high GH levels in competitive immunoassays during pregnancy. However, in immunometric assays, falsely high or low GH levels can result from GH-like molecules binding to both or only one monoclonal antibody. Since our GH-IFMA assay detected GH suppression in both normal and acromegalic pregnancies, we evaluated potential negative interference of pregnancy serum in the assay.

METHODS

GH was measured in samples from acromegalic patients with and without the addition of normal pregnancy serum using a sensitive in-house two-step GH-IFMA (no crossreactivity with pGH, Prolactin or hPL). Standard GH assay curves were run with and without pGH (20 and 22 K). Pegvisomant, a GH-antagonist with high homology to GH, was also tested for cross-reactivity.

RESULTS

Addition of pregnancy serum to acromegaly serum resulted in marked decrease in GH, but addition of pGH did not change GH measurements. Redesign of the routine assay by switching the positions of the antibodies ("inverted" assay) completely abrogated the interference of pregnancy serum. GH by both routine and inverted assays declined progressively throughout pregnancy in controls, with higher nadir levels in the "inverted" assay (median 0.03 μg/L vs 0.50 μg/L, P<0.05). GH suppression during acromegalic pregnancy previously found with the routine assay was not observed in the "inverted" assay. Pegvisomant does not cross-react with GH in the "inverted" assay.

CONCLUSIONS

GH measurements in pregnancy by immunometric assays must be made after exclusion of pregnancy serum interference by dilutional tests. Redesigning a two-step immunometric GH assay by switching the positions of the antibodies can be a successful strategy to abrogate such interference.