Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

The relationship between hirudin and activated clotting time: implications for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiac surgery

Anticoagulation with recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) (Refludan) has been suggested as an alternative to heparin for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring cardiac surgery. We sought to develop a modified activated coagulation time (ACT) that would allow quantification of the levels of r-hirudin required during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Twenty-one patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgical procedures requiring CPB were enrolled in this IRB-approved study. R-hirudin was added to blood specimens obtained before heparin administration (before CPB) and 30 min after heparin neutralization with protamine (after CPB) to result in concentrations of 0, 2, 4, 6, 7, or 8 microg/mL. Kaolin/ACT and complete blood count measurements were assayed in native specimens (first 10 patients, Phase I) or in specimens mixed with equal volumes of commercial normal plasma (second 11 patients, Phase II). In Phase I, good (r(2) = 0.83) linear relationships between ACT values and r-hirudin concentrations (< or =4 microg/mL) were observed in specimens obtained before CPB. However, ACT values were markedly prolonged (P < 0.0001) by r-hirudin in specimens obtained after CPB, with ACT values generally exceeding the ACT's detection limit (>999 s) at hirudin concentrations >2 microg/mL. In patient specimens mixed with normal plasma (Phase II), ACT/hirudin relationships (i.e., hirudin/ACT slope values obtained with hirudin concentration < or =4 microg/mL) in the post-CPB period (0.022 +/- 0.004 microg. mL(-1). s(-1)) were similar (P = 0.47) to those (0.019 +/- 0.004 microg. mL(-1). s(-1)) obtained in the pre-CPB period. Accordingly, a significant relationship between normal plasma-supplemented ACT values and predilution hirudin concentration was obtained in the post-CPB (hirudin = 0.039ACT - 4.34, r(2) = 0.91) period. Although our data demonstrate that the ACT test cannot be used to monitor hirudin during CPB, the addition of 50% normal plasma to post-CPB hemodiluted blood specimens yields a consistent linear relationship between hirudin concentration and ACT values up to a predilution concentration of 8 microg/mL. Plasma-modified ACT may be useful in monitoring hirudin anticoagulation during CPB.

IMPLICATIONS

A modified activated clotting time test system that may be helpful in monitoring hirudin anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is described.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: bovine versus porcine heparin in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated a high incidence of antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes, the antigen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. In many hospitals, beef lung heparin has been used historically for cardiopulmonary bypass, and there has been reluctance to change to porcine heparin despite concerns of an increased incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving bovine heparin.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial comparing bovine and porcine heparin in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery was conducted. Presurgery and postsurgery heparin antibody formation was studied using the serotonin release assay and a heparin/platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Data available on 98 patients, randomized to receive either bovine or porcine heparin, revealed no significant difference in patient positivity by serotonin release assay (12% in both groups) or by the heparin/platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (29% with porcine and 35% with bovine heparin) postoperatively. There were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative platelet counts or thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not support the belief that bovine heparin is more likely than porcine heparin to induce the development of antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4.

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with a history of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may be associated with complications related to their anticoagulation management.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 1999, among 4,850 adults patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our institution, 10 patients presented with preoperative type II HIT. In 4 patients, anticoagulation during CPB was achieved with danaparoid sodium. In 6 other patients, heparin sodium was used after pretreatment with epoprostenol sodium.

RESULTS

No significant change in platelet count occurred in any patient. No intraoperative thrombotic complication was encountered. Total postoperative chest drainage ranged from 250 to 1,100 ml in patients pretreated with epoprostenol and 1,700 to 2,470 ml in patients who received danaparoid sodium during CPB (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

During CPB, inhibition of platelet aggregation by prostacyclin may be a safe anticoagulation approach in patients with type II HIT.

Platelets: an update on diagnosis and management of thrombocytopenic disorders

Thrombocytopenia in the pregnant patient may result from a number of causes, most of which involve either immune-mediated platelet destruction or platelet consumption. Many of these disorders share clinical and laboratory features, making accurate diagnosis difficult. Moreover, uterine evacuation is indicated in the therapy of some disorders, while in others alternative interventions may allow the pregnancy to be carried to term. These and other issues are discussed as part of a comprehensive review of the differential diagnosis and management of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. The term "refractory ITP" is used with reference to two distinct groups of patients: 1) patients in whom the platelet count cannot be easily increased, including those who are poorly responsive to initial single agent treatment, and 2) those with persistent thrombocytopenia despite the use of conventional therapies. An approach to management of the former group will be presented, followed by a discussion of patients with chronic refractory ITP. The latter will include presentation of new data on the role of Helicobacter pylori in ITP and whether its treatment ameliorates thrombocytopenia, as well as the use of rituximab and other modalities. Thrombotic microangiopathies such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are rare, but life threatening causes of thrombocytopenia. Ultra-large multimers of von Willebrand factor (vWF) aggregate platelets intravascularly, and congenital or immune-mediated deficiencies of a metalloprotease that cleaves these ultra-large multimers may cause TTP. However, little information exists concerning the behavior of this protease in other physiological and pathological conditions. Levels of this protease have now been measured in healthy individuals of different ages, full-term newborns, pregnant women and a patients with variety of pathologic conditions, and these data will be reviewed herein. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HIT/T) remains the most common antibody-mediated, drug-induced thrombocytopenic disorder, and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Based on clinical correlations and murine models, there is increasing evidence that antibodies to complexes between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin cause HIT/T, and the molecular composition of the relevant antigen has also become better defined. However, the introduction of sensitive ELISAs to measure anti-PF4/heparin antibodies has complicated diagnosis in some settings in which the incidence of such antibodies in unaffected patients exceeds the incidence of the disease. In addition, the FDA approval of Lepirudin and Argatroban has expanded the repertoire of agents available for therapy of HIT/T and may change the approach to management of asymptomatic patients with thrombocytopenia. However, the optimal use of these drugs in commonly encountered settings remains in evolution, and a need for alternative approaches to prevention and treatment is evident.

Cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITT) is an immunomediated disorder induced by the administration of heparin for therapeutic purposes. The presence of this condition in patients requiring full heparinization for cardiopulmonary bypass constitutes a formidable challenge for the cardiac surgeon. In this review, the clinical and experimental experience described in the literature are discussed in the perspective of the normal coagulation and the pathophysiology of HITT and in the light of a variety of old and new alternative anticoagulants.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia thrombosis after cardiac surgery. A case report

We report a rare case of cerebral infarct resulting in brain death due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia thrombosis (HITT), manifested in the immediate postoperative period following aortic valve replacement in a 46-year-old woman whose only prior exposure to heparin was during catheterization four months prior to surgery. The diagnosis of HITT was suspected after a significant decrease of the platelet count and it was confirmed by a heparin-induced platelet activation assay showing platelet aggregation in the presence of heparin.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

Heparin remains the most commonly used parenteral medication in hospitalized patients. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome or the white clot syndrome are important complications of heparin use. This article provides an in-depth review of the etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management options in patients with HIT. Clinical problems associated with HIT such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and venous gangrene are described. The management options of HIT patients during cardiac interventional procedures and coronary surgery as well as recent advances in therapeutic options are summarized.

Safety of warfarin anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVES

Venous limb gangrene has been reported to occur after high warfarin doses in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and this observation has been used to exclude warfarin management in this condition. The outcome of patients receiving modest doses of warfarin was studied.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of 114 consecutive HIT patients who received diagnoses by platelet aggregometry; 51 of the 114 patients received warfarin.

SETTING

Tertiary-care medical center.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients received warfarin for non-HIT indications, and 16 received warfarin for heparin-associated thrombosis. Warfarin was given to 23 patients (47%) 2.4 +/- 0.4 days prior to the onset of HIT, in 19 while receiving IV heparin for an overlap of 2.7 +/- 0.4 days. Twenty-eight patients (53%) received warfarin 2.8 +/- 1.0 days after the diagnosis of HIT. Patients received 11 +/- 1 doses of warfarin over 16 +/- 2 days, with a mean daily dose of 3.5 +/- 0.5 and a maximum dose of 9 +/- 0.5 mg. Prothrombin time at discharge was 17.3 +/- 0.4 s with a maximum of 22.8 +/- 0.8. The final international normalized ratio was 2.9 +/- 0. 3, and the maximum was 7.5 +/- 1.4. The minimum therapeutic range was reached in 59% of determinations. When compared to the 63 patients who did not receive warfarin, warfarin patients received more IV heparin (86% vs 41%; p < 0.001), open heart surgery (78% vs 43%; p < 0.001), and had a lower mortality (8% vs 43%; p < 0.001), but had no differences in thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest doses of warfarin were not associated with a worse outcome in patients with HIT.

Immediate vein graft thrombectomy for acute occlusion after coronary artery bypass grafting

A 76-year-old man underwent coronary bypass grafting 3 days after exposure to heparin. Immediately after chest closure, he developed acute graft thrombosis and cardiac arrest in the setting of thrombocytopenia. Immediate graft thrombectomies were performed. Postoperative tests for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITT) were positive. This case represents a dramatic example of HITT after coronary revascularization.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: diagnosis and contemporary antithrombin management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may be complicated by severe thrombotic complications and death. Currently no specific laboratory test is available to make the diagnosis. When HIT is clinically suspected, heparin should be discontinued immediately. While no specific therapy for HIT exists, there is increasing evidence that acute antithrombin therapy may significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Among several agents, the direct antithrombins, such as r-hirudin and argatroban, look the most promising for acute treatment.

Failure of early heparin cessation as treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

The complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia include thrombosis and death. The purpose of the study was to determine whether early heparin cessation can prevent these outcomes.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosed by platelet aggregometry. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings were compared in patients by whether heparin treatment was stopped early (< or = 48 hours) or late (>48 hours) after the onset of thrombocytopenia, as well as between patients with and without thrombosis. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a 50% decline in baseline platelet counts or an absolute platelet count < 100,000/mm3.

RESULTS

Of the 113 patients, 38% developed thrombosis and 27% died. One-half of patients had thrombosis diagnosed >24 hours after heparin cessation. No difference in thrombosis or mortality was found in the 40 patients with early heparin cessation [mean (+/-SD) time of cessation 0.7 +/- 0.6 days] compared with the 73 patients with late heparin cessation (5 +/- 3 days). Thrombosis >24 hours after heparin cessation occurred in 61% of the patients in the early group and in 40% of the late group (P = 0.17). In a multivariate analysis, only a lower nadir of the platelet count (percent of baseline) was associated with thrombosis. Neither thrombosis nor the time to heparin cessation were associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early heparin cessation was not effective in reducing morbid events in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Treatment strategies other than heparin cessation alone should be considered in patients with this condition.

Recognition, diagnosis, and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

This case report describes a post-coronary artery bypass graft patient who developed arterial thrombosis and loss of a dominant hand as a result of the common and serious immune complication of heparin anticoagulation, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. This report underscores the need for all surgeons who use heparin in the course of their practice to be aware of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the spectrum of its clinical presentations and management. Thrombocytopenia or thrombosis that occurs in a patient receiving heparin should prompt a surgeon to stop all heparin as soon as possible and seek appropriate hematologic consultation. Because heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis are mainly clinical diagnoses, one should not wait for objective test confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia before stopping all heparin treatment. Alternative anticoagulation, other than low molecular weight heparin, must be considered for the patient who develops either condition. For surgeons who perform hand surgery, it is necessary to be aware of the significance of upper extremity thrombosis in a patient who is receiving heparin when consulted for surgical management.

Case managing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and its two subtypes, early onset (Type I) and delayed onset (Type II), are becoming an increasing concern in acute care. Also called "white clot syndrome," this condition can lead to thrombosis and loss of limb. Alternatives to heparin therapy, such as low molecular weight heparin, are discussed as ways to decrease HIT. An algorithm has been developed to guide identification and monitoring of patients at risk for HIT. The article presents the expanded role of the clinical nurse specialist as case manager in clinically managing patients with actual or potential HIT. The case manager's role for patients receiving heparin lies in increasing the awareness of this condition among all clinicians and serving as a resource for current information regarding its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Multiple coronary artery graft occlusion in a fatal case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening condition when immune-mediated platelet aggregation results in thromboembolic complications. A case is detailed of multiple saphenous vein graft thromboses and cardiac mural thrombi in a patient who died from complications of HIT.

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated heparin. A prospective study of inpatient treatment of internal medicine patients]

AIM

To investigate the influence of unfractionated heparin on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

In 162 patients with internal diseases treated therapeutically of prophylactically with unfractionated heparin (heparin sodium, heparin calcium), we carried out a prospective study to determine the incidence of HIT type I and II. 55.6% of the patients were female (n = 90) with an average age of 76.5 years (range: 25 to 96 years) and 44.4% male (n = 72) with an average age of 67.5 years (range: 17 to 93 years). A platelet count was taken regularly before the start of heparin treatment, on the first day of treatment and then every second day from day 5 to 20. Whenever HIT II was suspected, an HIPA test was performed.

RESULT

Type I HIT occurred in 10%, type II in 3% of the cases. Two of the 5 patients with type II developed severe thrombotic complications.

CONCLUSION

In view of the high incidence of HIT, regular platelet counts should always be carried out in patients receiving heparin treatment.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious complication of heparin therapy and is being encountered more frequently in patients with cardiovascular disease as use of anticoagulant therapy becomes more widespread. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this immune-mediated condition has improved in recent years, with heparin-platelet factor 4 complex as the culprit antigen in most patients. New sensitive laboratory assays for the pathogenic antibody are now available and should permit an earlier, more reliable diagnosis, but their optimal application remains to be defined. For patients in whom HIT is diagnosed, immediate discontinuation of heparin infusions and elimination of heparin from all flushes and ports are mandatory. Further management of patients with HIT is problematic at present, as there are no readily available alternative anticoagulant agents in the United States with proven efficacy in acute coronary disease. The direct thrombin inhibitors appear to be the most promising alternatives to heparin, when continued use of heparin is contraindicated, and the results of several multicenter trials evaluating their application in patients with HIT are awaited.

The Incidence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenias

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) types I and II was investigated retrospectively in 500 heparin-treated patients. In our department of internal medicine 500 patients were treated with unfractionated, middle- or low-molecular heparin (s.c. or i.v.) during 1995 as inpatients. Excluded were patients with other known causes of thrombocytopenia. There were 306 females (61%), mean age 76 years (17-98 years) and 194 males (39%), mean age 73 years (24-93 years). The incidence of HI type I was 4.4% and of HIT type II 0.6% with a positive heparin-induced-platelet-activation test (HIPA test). In addition, HIT type II was suspected in another 1.4% of cases with negative or missing HIPA test. Because of our results on the incidence of HIT type I and type II a close control of thrombocyte count during heparin therapy is necessary. In the case of HIT type II disease, heparin therapy must be stopped immediately.

Prevalence of heparin-associated antibodies without thrombosis in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients with cardiovascular disease almost invariably receive heparin before cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, which places them at risk of developing heparin-associated antibodies with a risk of thromboembolic complications. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies in patients before and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Plasma from 111 patients was tested before surgery and 5 days after surgery for heparin-dependent platelet-reactive antibodies with a 14C-serotonin-release assay (SRA) and for antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes with an ELISA. Heparin exposure after surgery was minimized. Heparin-dependent antibodies were detected before surgery in 5% of patients with SRA and 19% of patients with ELISA. By the fifth postoperative day, there was a marked increase in patients positive on the SRA or ELISA (13% and 51%, respectively; P < .01 for each). Patients who had received heparin therapy earlier in their hospitalization were more likely to have a positive ELISA before surgery (35%; P = .017) and a positive ELISA (68%; P = .054) or SRA (30%; P = .002) after surgery. However, there was no difference in the prevalence of thrombocytopenia or thromboembolic events between the antibody-positive and-negative groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one fifth of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery have heparin-induced platelet antibodies detectable before the procedure as a result of prior heparin exposure, and many more develop antibodies after surgery. The absence of an association between these antibodies and thromboembolic complications in this study may be, in part, attributable to careful avoidance of heparin after surgery. The high prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies in this setting suggests that these patients may be at risk of developing thrombotic complications with additional heparin exposure.

Lower extremity amputation secondary to heparin-associated thrombocytopenia with thrombosis

A rare cause of limb amputation is heparin-associated thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HATT). There have been no case reports in the rehabilitation literature of lower extremity amputation secondary to HATT. Three case reports are presented to illustrate how HATT can develop and cause limb ischemia with subsequent amputation. HATT occurs in less than 1% of patients receiving heparin, has an immunological basis for its etiology, and is diagnosed both clinically and with laboratory confirmation. In addition, there are various treatment options, with the most fundamental being cessation of heparin therapy. HATT does present in the rehabilitation setting and physiatrists should be prepared to diagnose and manage it effectively.

Lupus anticoagulant, heparin use, and thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

An increased occurrence of thrombotic events has been described in patients exhibiting a lupus anticoagulant (LA). In patients with chronic, major vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, not only has there been a relatively high frequency of the LA, but also an unexpected association with heparin-related thrombocytopenia. This retrospective report emphasizes the frequency of this association.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 216 patients admitted to the University of California, San Diego, Medical Center who were being considered for surgical correction of their chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. For each patient, the following information was sought: presence of an LA, variation in platelet numbers during the preoperative evaluation, and determination of whether an observed thrombocytopenia was related to heparin use.

RESULTS

An LA was found in 23 of the 216 patients (10.6%). Of the remaining patients, sufficient platelet data for comparison were available for 68 patients. These 68 patients constituted the control group. Within the LA group, platelet counts during the preoperative evaluation declined to 51.6% +/- 16.7% of baseline counts, a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001) compared with the non-LA control group, who underwent a comparable evaluation with similar heparin exposure. In addition, heparin-associated thrombocytopenia developed in 13 of the 23 LA patients (56.5%) and in none of the control patients. Heparin-induced arterial thrombosis was implicated as the cause of a myocardial infarction in 1 of the patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, a high incidence of the LA and an accompanying association with heparin-related thrombocytopenia have been observed. Although further prospective studies of this relationship are needed, physicians should be alert to the possibility of thrombocytopenia when using heparin for patients exhibiting an LA.

Critical role of pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary emboli following cardiac surgery

This study was conducted to identify patients at high risk of the development of Pulmonary Embolism (PE) after open heart surgery, to evaluate pertinent diagnostic methods, and to assess the mortality associated with this complication. We evaluated the records of 2,551 consecutive patients who underwent open heart surgery over a 10-year period to identify those patients in whom PE developed. All surgical reports, ventilation/perfusion scans, pulmonary angiograms, and autopsies from the same period were also reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative risk factors for pulmonary embolism were also analyzed, as well as the outcome of this complication in each type of surgical procedure. Pulmonary embolism was identified in 69 (2.7%) patients after open heart surgery, in 43 (62.3%) of whom the diagnosis was established within the first week of surgery. Factors associated with high incidence for PE were hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001); obesity and prolonged mechanical ventilation (P < 0.005); and prior right heart catheterization by the femoral approach and prior PE and/or deep vein thrombosis (P < 0.05). The diagnosis of PE was established by a high-probability ventilation/perfusion scan in 25 patients, by pulmonary angiography in 42 (29 of whom had prior V/Q scan read as intermediate or low probability for PE) and by autopsy in two patients. The mortality rate in patients who had PE was 7.2%, while in those without this complication it was 3.2%. These findings suggest that aggressive approach for the diagnosis of PE by pulmonary angiography whenever the V/Q scan is not read as high probability is crucial in patients with recent open heart surgery; such approach may identify patients with PE at an early stage and may have an impact in reducing mortality incurred by this complication. This diagnostic assessment should be emphasized in the perioperative period, especially in patients with multiple significant and identifiable risk factors for PE.

Current concepts in anticoagulant therapy

An understanding of the international normalized ratio (INR)--which was developed to standardize reporting of the prothrombin time (PT) and provide consistent regulation of anticoagulation--is important. The recommended therapeutic range for the INR (which is calculated from the patient's PT, a mean control PT, and the international sensitivity index) for oral anticoagulant treatment of most conditions is 2.0 to 3.0. In patients with mechanical cardiac valves, the INR should be at least 2.5 to 3.5. A common cause for progression of venous thromboembolic disease and treatment failure is inadequate heparinization during the first day of treatment. Therefore, an intravenous bolus of 5,000 to 10,000 U of heparin should be administered before a maintenance infusion is initiated. Also during the first day of treatment, warfarin therapy can be implemented. Overlap treatment with heparin and warfarin for 4 or 5 days is recommended. Low-molecular-weight heparins, a new class of anticoagulants, have been shown to be more effective than standard heparin in preventing venous thrombosis in orthopedic surgical patients, but at a higher cost. Patients with mechanical cardiac valves who are receiving anticoagulant therapy and are scheduled for noncardiac operations must have a risk-to-benefit assessment of the need for continuous anticoagulation performed preoperatively. Many of these patients can safely discontinue warfarin therapy for several days as outpatients before the surgical procedure. Preoperative heparin therapy and warfarin withdrawal in the hospital are recommended only for those patients with cardiac valves at high risk for systemic embolization (with a mitral valve prosthesis, cardiomyopathy, or previous thromboembolism). The concurrent use of certain drugs or presence of comorbid conditions can predispose to hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Heparin-induced thrombopenia during hemodialysis in intensive care: use of a low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (Orgaran)]

A 48-yr-old patient was admitted to the ICU for cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurred during haemodialysis with unfractioned heparin (UFH) as the anticoagulant. The dialysers, the circuits and the catheters were recurrently thrombosing and the platelet count decreased to 9 G.L-1 on postoperative day 7. UFH was discontinued. Attempts to substitute UFH with a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) failed, due to the presence of a high cross-reactivity rate of LMWH with the heparin-dependent antibody. Intermittent haemodialysis without anticoagulation using a predilution of the dialysers failed also and resulted in recurrent clotting. After informed consent of the patient, a new natural heparinoid Orgaran (Org 10172, Organon, Oss Holland) was administered. This agent is a mixture of several non heparin low molecular weight glycosaminoglycans, with proven anticoagulant efficacy, low cross-reactivity with the HIT antibody, and a half-time prolonged over 18-25 hours. The treatment regimen consisted in a i.v. bolus of 40-45 IU.kg-1 prior to each dialysis procedure, performed every two days. The platelet count increased to 200 G.L-1, seven days after discontinuing heparin injection, and remained stable during the administration of Orgaran. No other thrombosis occurred again. Each procedure of four hours duration was monitored with the plasma anti-Xa activity and APTT test. The mean anti-Xa plasma concentrations (0.44 +/- 0.55 IU.mL-1, 30 min after injection of Orgaran) were well correlated with APTT test (r = 0.73, p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)