Impact of pharmacy counseling on compliance and effectiveness of combination lipid-lowering therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization: a randomized, controlled trial

Adherence: a review of education, research, practice, and policy in the United States

Objective

To describe the education, research, practice, and policy related to pharmacist interventions to improve medication adherence in community settings in the United States.

Methods

Authors used MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (since 1990) to identify community and ambulatory pharmacy intervention studies which aimed to improve medication adherence. The authors also searched the primary literature using Ovid to identify studies related to the pharmacy teaching of medication adherence. The bibliographies of relevant studies were reviewed in order to identify additional literature. We searched the tables of content of three US pharmacy education journals and reviewed the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy website for materials on teaching adherence principles. Policies related to medication adherence were identified based on what was commonly known to the authors from professional experience, attendance at professional meetings, and pharmacy journals.

Results

Research and Practice: 29 studies were identified: 18 randomized controlled trials; 3 prospective cohort studies; 2 retrospective cohort studies; 5 case-controlled studies; and one other study. There was considerable variability in types of interventions and use of adherence measures. Many of the interventions were completed by pharmacists with advanced clinical backgrounds and not typical of pharmacists in community settings. The positive intervention effects had either decreased or not been sustained after interventions were removed. Although not formally assessed, in general, the average community pharmacy did not routinely assess and/or intervene on medication adherence.

Education

National pharmacy education groups support the need for pharmacists to learn and use adherence-related skills. Educational efforts involving adherence have focused on students’ awareness of adherence barriers and communication skills needed to engage patients in behavioral change.

Policy

Several changes in pharmacy practice and national legislation have provided pharmacists opportunities to intervene and monitor medication adherence. Some of these changes have involved the use of technologies and provision of specialized services to improve adherence.

Conclusions

Researchers and practitioners need to evaluate feasible and sustainable models for pharmacists in community settings to consistently and efficiently help patients better use their medications and improve their health outcomes.

Effect of reminder cards on compliance with antihypertensive medication

Objective

Poor compliance to antihypertensive medications has been identified as a primary cause of uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), with consequent increases in hypertension-related morbidity and mortality. Therefore, any measure known to improve compliance should be encouraged. This study assessed the impact of reminder cards on compliance to antihypertensive therapy.

Method

A field trial was undertaken in pharmacies located in the districts of Lisbon and Porto. Eligible participants comprised those aged 30–74 years, prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in monotherapy, and taken on a once-daily regimen. Patients were allocated to control group (CG) or intervention group (IG), the latter being provided with a reminder card, an alarm-type device due to remind the patient of the time to take his medication. Patients were monitored monthly during 3 months for compliance and blood pressure control.

Key findings

Seventy-one patients participated in the study (intervention: 35; control group: 36). Compliance was similar between the groups in the first 2 months of follow-up (97.1% IG vs 94.9% CG at first follow-up and 97.5% IG vs 94.2% CG at second follow-up) and higher in the intervention group at the end of the study (97.3% IG vs 87.3% CG; P = 0.011). There were no mean blood pressure differences between compliant and non-compliant subjects at the end of the study (P value for differences in systolic BP (Psyst) = 0.580; and P value for differences in diastolic BP (Pdlast) = 0.175).

Conclusion

This small-scale study indicates a possible positive impact on patients' compliance resulting from the use of reminder cards. However, this needs confirming in larger scale studies with longer monitoring periods.

The cost and effectiveness of adherence-improving interventions for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs*

AIMS

Adherence to cardiovascular medications is poor. Accordingly, interventions have been proposed to improve adherence. However, as intervention-associated costs are rarely considered in full, we sought to review the effectiveness and costs associated with different adherence-improving interventions for cardiovascular disease therapies.

METHODS

We reviewed MEDLINE to update a prior review of interventions to improve adherence with antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering therapy covering January 1972 to June 2002, to add studies published from July 2002 to October 2007. Eligible studies evaluated > or = 1 intervention compared with a control, used measures other than self-report, reported significant improvement in adherence and followed patients for > or = 6 months. Effectiveness was measured as relative improvement (RI), the ratio of adherence in the intervention group to the control group. Costs were calculated based on those reported in the analysis, if available or estimated based on resource use described. All costs were truncated to 6 months and adjusted to 2007 US$.

RESULTS

Of 755 new articles, five met all eligibility criteria. Combining with the prior review gave 23 interventions from 18 studies. RI in adherence ranged from 1.11 to 4.65. Six-month intervention costs ranged from $10 to $142 per patient. Reminders had the lowest effectiveness (RI: 1.11-1.14), but were least costly ($10/6 months). Case management was most effective (RI: 1.23-4.65), but the most costly ($90-$130/6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, we found a positive association between intervention costs and effectiveness. Therefore, consideration of intervention costs, along with the benefits afforded to adherence, may help guide the design and implementation of adherence-improving programs.

Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of death globally. Despite proven health benefits and international recommendations, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation programs is poor. Telehealth (phone, Internet, and videoconference communication between patient and health-care provider) has emerged as an innovative way of delivering health interventions. This review aimed to determine telehealth effectiveness in CHD management. Study design includes systematic review with meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials evaluating telehealth interventions in patients with CHD were identified by searching multiple electronic databases, reference lists, relevant conference lists, gray literature, and key-word searching of the Internet. Studies were selected if they evaluated a telephone, videoconference, or web-based intervention, provided objective measurements of mortality, changes in multiple risk factor levels or quality of life. In total, 11 trials were identified (3145 patients). Telehealth interventions were associated with nonsignificant lower all-cause mortality than controls [relative risk=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.45-1.1; P=0.12]. These interventions showed a significantly lower weighted mean difference (WMD) at medium long-term follow-up than controls for total cholesterol (WMD=0.37 mmol/l, 95% CI=0.19-0.56, P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (WMD=4.69 mmHg, 95% CI=2.91-6.47, P<0.001), and fewer smokers (relative risk = 0.84, 95% CI=0.65-0.98, P = 0.04). Significant favorable changes at follow-up were also found in high-density lipoprotien and low-density lipoprotein. In conclusion, telehealth interventions provide effective risk factor reduction and secondary prevention. Provision of telehealth models could help increase uptake of a formal secondary prevention by those who do not access cardiac rehabilitation and narrow the current evidence-practice gap.

The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: a review

OBJECTIVES

To review studies of patient compliance/persistence with cardiovascular or antidiabetic medication published since the year 2000; to compare the methods used to measure compliance/persistence across studies; to compare reported compliance/persistence rates across therapeutic classes and to assess whether compliance/persistence correlates with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

English language papers published between January 2000 and November 2005 investigating patient compliance/persistence with cardiovascular or antidiabetic medication were identified through searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Definitions and measurements of compliance/persistence were compared across therapeutic areas using contingency tables.

RESULTS

Of the 139 studies analysed, 32% focused on hypertension, 27% on diabetes and 13% on dyslipidaemia. The remainder covered coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in general. The most frequently reported measure of compliance was the 12-month medication possession ratio (MPR). The overall mean MPR was 72%, and the MPR did not differ significantly between treatment classes (range: 67-76%). The average proportion of patients with an MPR of >80% was 59% overall, 64% for antihypertensives, 58% for oral antidiabetics, 51% for lipid-lowering agents and 69% in studies of multiple treatments, again with no significant difference between treatment classes. The average 12-month persistence rate was 63% and was similar across therapeutic classes. Good compliance had a positive effect on outcome in 73% of the studies examining clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-compliance with cardiovascular and antidiabetic medication is a significant problem, with around 30% of days 'on therapy' not covered by medication and only 59% of patients taking medication for more than 80% of their days 'on therapy' in a year. Good compliance has a positive effect on clinical outcome, suggesting that the management of CVD may be improved by improving patient compliance.

[Therapy compliance in cases of hyperlipaemia, as measured through electronic monitors. Is a reminder calendar to avoid forgetfulness effective?]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy of the intervention with a calendar reminder of the medication taking in the treatment of the hyperlipidemias.

DESIGN

Controlled, randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

Twelve clinics at 5 primary care centres, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and twenty people diagnosed with hypercholesterolaemia according to Spanish Consensus criteria were chosen.

INTERVENTION

Two groups were formed. The control group (CG) of 110 patients, who received the doctor's normal treatment; and the Intervention group (IG) of 110 patients, who received in addition a calendar remider of medication taking.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Meausured of compliance was performed by moniotrs electronic (MEMS) and cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, and LDL-C determined at the start, and at the third and sixth months. Percentages of patients complying (80%-110%), the mean compliance percentage and the degree of control were compared. The reduction of absolute and relative risk (RAR and RRR) and the mean number of people that required an intervention in order to avoid non-compliance (NI) were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty eight people (85.45%) completed the survey, 96 in the IG and 92 in the CG; 26.55% were non compliers with the therapy (CI, +/-6.3%) (IG, 10.5%, CI, +/-4.6%; CG, 42.6%, CI, +/-10.1% [P<.0001]). Mean compliance ran at 88,1% (IC, +/-4.6%) overall, at 92% (CI, +/-5.4%) in the IG and at 84% (CI, +/-7.4%) in the IG (P<.05). The RAR was 32.1%, the RRR 75.35%, and the NI was 3.1 patients. The patients with cholesterol controlled ran at 66.7% (CI, +/-9.4%) in the IG and 41.2% in the CG (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The calendar reminder intervention is an efficacious way of improving the percentage of patients complying with lipaemia treatment.

Effects of an enhanced secondary prevention program for patients with heart disease: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Secondary prevention medications in cardiac patients improve outcomes. However, prescription rates for these drugs and long-term adherence are suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an enhanced secondary prevention program improves outcomes.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with indications for secondary prevention medications were randomly assigned to either usual care or an intervention arm, in which an intensive program was used to optimize prescription rates and long-term adherence. Follow-up was 19 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2643 patients were randomly assigned in the study; 1342 patients were assigned to usual care and 1301 patients were assigned to the intervention arm. Prescription rates were near optimal except for lipid-lowering medications. Rehospitalization rates per 100 patients were 136.2 and 132.6 over 19 months in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively (P=0.59). Total days in hospital per patient were similar (10.9 days in the usual care group versus 10.2 days in the intervention group; P not significant). Crude mortality was 6.2% and 5.5% in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.15) in overall survival. Post hoc analysis suggested that after the study team became experienced, days in hospital per patient were reduced by the program (11.1+/-0.91 and 8.9+/-0.61 in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention program failed to improve outcomes in the present study. One explanation for these results is the near optimal physician compliance with guidelines in both groups. It is also possible that a substantial learning curve for the staff was involved, as suggested by the reduction in total days in hospital in the intervention patients during the second part of the study.

Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home

BACKGROUND

It is known that many patients encounter a variety of problems in the first weeks after they have been discharged from hospital to home. In recent years many projects have addressed discharge planning, with the aim of reducing problems after discharge. Telephone follow-up (TFU) is seen as a good means of exchanging information, providing health education and advice, managing symptoms, recognising complications early, giving reassurance and providing quality aftercare service. Some research has shown that telephone follow-up is feasible, and that patients appreciate such calls. However, at present it is not clear whether TFU is also effective in reducing postdischarge problems.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of follow-up telephone calls in the first month post discharge, initiated by hospital-based health professionals, to patients discharged from hospital to home.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases from their start date to July 2003, without limits as to date of publication or language: the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), PubMed, EMBASE (OVID), BiomedCentral, CINAHL, ERIC (OVID), INVERT (Dutch nursing literature index), LILACS, Picarta (Dutch library system), PsycINFO/PsycLIT (OVID), the Combined Social and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E), SOCIOFILE. We searched for ongoing research in the following databases: National Research Register (http://www.update-software.com/nrr/); Controlled Clinical Trials (http://www.controlled-trials.com/); and Clinical Trials (http://clinicaltrials.gov/). We searched the reference lists of included studies and contacted researchers active in this area.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of TFU initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for patients discharged home from an acute hospital setting. The intervention was delivered within the first month after discharge; outcomes were measured within 3 months after discharge, and either the TFU was the only intervention, or its effect could be analysed separately.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and for methodological quality. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the criteria from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. The data-extraction form was based on the template developed by the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Data was extracted by one review author and checked by a second author. For as far it was considered that there was enough clinical homogeneity with regard to patient groups and measured outcomes, statistical pooling was planned using a random effects model and standardised mean differences for continuous scales and relative risks for dichotomous data, and tests for statistical heterogeneity were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 33 studies involving 5110 patients. Predominantly, the studies were of low methodological quality. TFU has been applied in many patient groups. There is a large variety in the ways the TFU was performed (the health professionals who undertook the TFU, frequency, structure, duration, etc.). Many different outcomes have been measured, but only a few were measured across more than one study. Effects are not constant across studies, nor within patient groups. Due to methodological and clinical diversity, quantitative pooling could only be performed for a few outcomes. Of the eight meta-analyses in this review, five showed considerable statistical heterogeneity. Overall, there was inconclusive evidence about the effects of TFU.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The low methodological quality of the included studies means that results must be considered with caution. No adverse effects were reported. Nevertheless, although some studies find that the intervention had favourable effects for some outcomes, overall the studies show clinically-equivalent results between TFU and control groups. In summary, we cannot conclude that TFU is an effective intervention.

Evaluation of patient and provider satisfaction with a pharmacist-managed lipid clinic in a Veterans Affairs medical center

PURPOSE

Patient and provider satisfaction with a pharmacist-managed lipid clinic in a Veterans Affairs medical center were assessed.

METHODS

All patients at Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center who were referred to a pharmacist-managed lipid clinic for drug therapy management were mailed a questionnaire addressing overall satisfaction with care provided by the lipid clinic. Chart reviews were performed for patients completing the questionnaire to ascertain lipid-lowering medications used, changes in serum cholesterol levels, and achievement of low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal. Health care providers referring patients to the lipid clinic were sent an anonymous electronic questionnaire to assess provider satisfaction with the clinic. Responses to the questionnaire were rated on a Likert scale (strongly agree, somewhat agree, neutral, somewhat disagree, strongly disagree). A paired t test was used to assess the percent change in lipid values, and chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the achievement of each patient's LDL cholesterol goal.

RESULTS

Surveys were sent to 224 patients and 104 providers. A total of 105 patients (47%) and 49 providers (47%) completed the questionnaire. Most patients and providers expressed satisfaction with the clinic, with 91.4% of patients and 87.8% of providers indicating that they were strongly or somewhat satisfied with the care provided by the pharmacist-managed clinic. Attainment rates of goal LDL cholesterol levels increased from 8.6% at baseline to 53.3% at discharge or the most recent measurement (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Most patients and providers were satisfied with the services provided by the pharmacist-managed lipid clinic. The clinic helped improve patients' LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels.

The 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part II - Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the management of hypertension in adults.

OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES

For lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, evidence from randomized, controlled trials and systematic reviews of trials was preferentially reviewed. Changes in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were the primary outcomes of interest. For lifestyle interventions, blood pressure (BP) lowering was accepted as a primary outcome given the lack of long-term morbidity/mortality data in this field. For treatment of patients with kidney disease, the development of proteinuria or worsening of kidney function was also accepted as a clinically relevant primary outcome.

EVIDENCE

MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2004 to October 2005 to update the 2005 recommendations. In addition, reference lists were scanned and experts were contacted to identify additional published studies. All relevant articles were reviewed and appraised independently by content and methodological experts using prespecified levels of evidence.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Lifestyle modifications to prevent and/or treat hypertension include the following: perform 30 min to 60 min of aerobic exercise four to seven days per week; maintain a healthy body weight (body mass index of 18.5 kg/m2 to 24.9 kg/m2) and waist circumference (less than 102 cm for men and less than 88 cm for women); limit alcohol consumption to no more than 14 standard drinks per week in men or nine standard drinks per week in women; follow a diet that is reduced in saturated fat and cholesterol and that emphasizes fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy products; restrict salt intake; and consider stress management in selected individuals. Treatment thresholds and targets should take into account each individual's global atherosclerotic risk, target organ damage and comorbid conditions. BP should be lowered to less than 140/90 mmHg in all patients, and to less than 130/80 mmHg in those with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease (regardless of the degree of proteinuria). Most adults with hypertension require more than one agent to achieve these target BPs. For adults without compelling indications for other agents, initial therapy should include thiazide diuretics. Other agents appropriate for first-line therapy for diastolic hypertension with or without systolic hypertension include beta-blockers (in those younger than 60 years), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (in nonblack patients), long-acting calcium channel blockers or angiotensin receptor antagonists. Other agents for first-line therapy for isolated systolic hypertension include long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers or angiotensin receptor antagonists. Certain comorbid conditions provide compelling indications for first-line use of other agents: in patients with angina, recent myocardial infarction or heart failure, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors are recommended as first-line therapy; in patients with diabetes mellitus, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists (or in patients without albuminuria, thiazides or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) are appropriate first-line therapies; and in patients with nondiabetic chronic kidney disease, ACE inhibitors are recommended. All hypertensive patients should have their fasting lipids screened, and those with dyslipidemia should be treated using the thresholds, targets and agents recommended by the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Working Group on the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Selected patients with hypertension, but without dyslipidemia, should also receive statin therapy and/or acetylsalicylic acid therapy.

VALIDATION

All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 45 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported here achieved at least 95% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.

Highlights and summary of the 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations

The present paper summarizes and highlights key messages of the 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management and diagnosis of hypertension. An important message in the 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations is to improve patient adherence to antihypertensive therapy by incorporating a number of techniques. These new recommendations still need to be incorporated into what remain as the older but still important considerations for the diagnosis, management and treatment of the patient with hypertension, namely, to assess blood pressure in all adults at all appropriate visits, to expedite the diagnosis of hypertension, to assess and manage global cardiovascular risk, to emphasize that lifestyle modifications are the cornerstone of antihypertensive therapy, to treat to target, and to use combinations of antihypertensive medications and lifestyles to achieve recommended targets. Minor changes in pharmacological therapies are discussed, and potentially important aspects related to home and self-monitoring, particularly with respect to patients with masked hypertension (blood pressure controlled in the office but not at home), are introduced.

Medication refill logistics and refill adherence in HIV

PURPOSE

Strict adherence to antiretroviral therapy is instrumental in viral suppression and treatment success. The relation between pharmacy-based factors and treatment adherence has been under-explored. We aimed to determine whether different medication refill mechanisms were associated with differences in antiretroviral refill adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 110 HIV-infected subjects on standard antiretroviral regimens for >or=3 months cared for at the Philadelphia Veterans' Affairs Medical Center HIV clinic. The primary outcome was a pharmacy-based measure of antiretroviral refill adherence over the 3 months of treatment immediately prior to the study date.

RESULTS

The group obtaining refills at the pharmacy had lower adherence [80% (interquartile range (IQR), 69-99%)] than the group obtaining refills via pill organizers dispensed by a pharmacist [99% (IQR, 97-100%), p=0.003] and the group obtaining refills via mail order [91% (IQR, 79-100%); p=0.04].

CONCLUSIONS

Mail ordering and pharmacists dispensing refills in pill organizers may each be effective strategies for improving medication adherence, although they target different barriers and differ in their degree of intensity. Each should be considered for adherence interventions in HIV and further studied in other disease and treatment settings.

Evidence-based interventions to improve patient compliance with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications

The MEDLINE database was searched from 1972 to June 2002 to identify studies of interventions designed to improve compliance with antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications. Studies were required to employ a controlled design, follow patients for >or=6 months and measure compliance by a method other than patient self-report. The literature review yielded 62 studies describing 79 interventions. Overall, 56% of interventions were reported to improve patient compliance. When only those studies meeting minimum criteria for methodological quality were considered, 22 interventions remained and 12 were recommended, because they demonstrated a significant improvement in compliance. Recommended interventions included fixed-dose combination drugs, once-daily or once-weekly dosing schedules, unit-dose packaging, educational counselling by telephone, case management by pharmacists, treatment in pharmacist- or nurse-operated disease management clinics, mailed refill reminders, self-monitoring, dose-tailoring, rewards and various combination strategies. Personalised, patient-focused programs that involved frequent contact with health professionals or a combination of interventions were the most effective at improving compliance. Less-intensive strategies, such as prescribing products that simplify the medication regimen or sending refill reminders, achieved smaller improvements in compliance but may be cost-effective due to their low cost.

Beyond guidelines: achieving the optimum in LDL cholesterol control

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite clear treatment guidelines, a major part of the population is not achieving the recommended LDL cholesterol target levels. This fact is more prominent among high-risk populations in which the majority of patients are untreated or undertreated.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review will elaborate on the key issues of treating large populations: patient compliance, drug efficacy, cost-benefit, and physician quality of care.

SUMMARY

A programme aimed at improving control of hyperlipidemia should address all four issues. The primary care physician should be empowered and given tools for optimizing treatment.

Importancia del cumplimiento terapéutico en la insuficiencia cardíaca

It is recognized that the irregularity in therapeutic compliance is one of the main unstabilizing factors leading to hospitalization in patients with heart failure (HF). In this review, we specifically deal with the Pharmacological Therapeutic Adherence (PTA) in HF patients, and especially with the adherence problems related to those drugs which have been shown to improve the prognosis of the disease. The impact of a deficient PTA (DPTA) jeopardizes the efficiency of the new neurohormonal inhibitor drugs which have proven benefit in wide and expensive clinical trials. It is necessary to have more information about PTA, to develop skills and methods to identify noncompliant patients and to practically improve those actions which have shown some positive effect on DPTA. Some DPTA-related problems owe to inappropriate therapeutic schemes, adverse effects, social deprivation, scarce interaction with the physician and an inadequate health education. Uninformed patients use to believe that they must take the medicines only when they feel sick and have symptoms, yet they believe that drugs can be withdrawn when they feel better. Different pharmacological groups may have different adherence problems in HF. It is estimated that those interventions aimed at improving adherence are useful for the reduction of health costs are they are likely more effective than the effects caused by choosing a given drug. The choosing method to assess PTA in practice with reliability is the counting of pills combined with a compliance survey. Time spent to improve adherence not only can improve it but also it can diminish the total time spent by the physician in the follow-up of these patients.

Optimal lipid modification: the rationale for combination therapy

BACKGROUND

An emphasis on more aggressive lipid-lowering, particularly of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to improve patient outcomes has led to an increased use of combination lipid-lowering drugs. This strategy, while potentially beneficial, has triggered concerns regarding fears of adverse effects, harmful drug interactions, and patient nonadherence.

OBJECTIVE

To present key data regarding combination lipid-altering therapy including use, rationale, major trials, benefits, potential adverse effects, compliance issues, and limitations.

METHOD

Literature was obtained from MEDLINE (1966 - June 2005) and references from selected articles.

RESULTS

A substantial body of evidence from epidemiological data and clinical trials indicates that aggressive lipid modification, especially low-density lipoprotein reduction, is associated with reduced cardiovascular events. Numerous studies utilizing various combinations of cholesterol-lowering agents including statin/fibrate, statin/niacin, statin/bile acid resin, and statin/ezetimibe have demonstrated significant changes in the lipid profile with acceptable safety. Long-term trials of combination therapy evaluating clinical outcomes or surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease, while limited, are promising.

CONCLUSION

Combining lipid-altering agents results in additional improvements in lipoproteins and has the potential to further reduce cardiovascular events beyond that of monotherapy.

Repeat prescribing: scale, problems and quality management in ambulatory care patients

The reported scale of repeat prescriptions ranges from 29% to 75% of all items prescribed, depending on the definition of repeat prescribing and other variables. It is likely that a substantial part of repeat prescribing by general practitioners (GPs) occurs without direct doctor-patient contact. While this reduces the workload for the GP and is convenient for the patient, it does not provide the adequate control that is needed to ensure that every repeat prescription is still appropriate, effective and well tolerated, and that it is still being viewed upon and taken by the patient as intended. Infrequent therapy reviews may lead to failure to prevent, identify and solve drug-related problems and drug wastage, and may, thereby, have a negative impact on the effectiveness, safety or cost of the medications prescribed. Studies evaluating the repeat prescribing process have shown that GPs and medical practices vary widely in their degree of administrative and clinical control of repeat prescriptions. Contrary to the opinion that GPs cannot change prescribing behaviour when the prescription is initiated by a medical specialist, GPs have their own responsibility for controlling the repeats of such prescriptions. Intervention studies suggest that a medication review by a pharmacist can help to reduce drug-related problems with repeat prescriptions, and the effectiveness of the intervention may be increased by combining the medication review with a consultation of the patient's medical records and a patient interview. In several studies, such an intervention was relatively inexpensive and, therefore, feasible. However, these conclusions should be viewed with appropriate caution because a number of caveats pertain. There is still no evidence that these types of intervention improve health-related quality of life or reduce healthcare cost, and so far only a few trials have produced any evidence of clinical improvement. As implicit and explicit screening criteria have their own benefits and limitations, a combined application may offer a more thorough assessment but may also be more complex and time consuming. Further studies on the development and evaluation of repeat prescription management models are needed, preferably focussing on improving clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes. New studies should investigate the effects of: different types of interventions; different organisational models; different target populations; and selecting and training different types of healthcare professionals. Future studies should also assess whether results are sustained, the optimal time interval between reviews of repeat prescriptions, and the possibilities offered by new computerised support technologies.

Cost of a pharmacist-directed intervention to increase treatment of hypercholesterolemia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost of a pharmacist-directed intervention that prompts physicians to treat hypercholesterolemia more aggressively in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

Health care resource use and CHD outcomes were evaluated for 612 patients with CHD followed for 2 years after an index hospitalization for an ischemic event. After discharge, the physicians of 309 patients who had been admitted from January 1--March 31, 1999, were contacted by telephone and mail concerning lipid profiles and statin therapy. These patients were the intervention group. Controls were 303 patients admitted from October 1--December 31, 1998; their physicians were not contacted. Costs of the physician-prompting intervention, clinic visits, laboratory tests, statin drugs, and CHD outcomes were compared between these two patient groups.

RESULTS

The number of clinic visits, laboratory tests, and statins prescribed was significantly greater for the intervention group versus the controls. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the intervention group (55%) than in the control group (18%) achieved their National Cholesterol Education Program target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and had significantly better CHD outcomes. The cost of the physician-prompting intervention (pharmacist salaries, postage, telephone calls) was $102,941. For patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, the cost of statin therapy was $352,365 and $200,087, the cost of clinic visits and laboratory tests $48,097 and $27,367, and the cost of coronary heart disease outcomes, such as myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal and coronary angioplasty, $1,073,495 and $1,741,220. The total cost was $1,576,898 and $1,968,674, respectively, for patients in the intervention and control groups. Net savings was $1394/patient over the 2-year period.

CONCLUSION

A relatively simple physician-prompting intervention involving patients with CHD significantly improved the use of lipid testing and statin therapy. Improved use of statins was associated with better CHD outcomes. As a result, the physician-prompting intervention was associated with cost savings. This intervention should be implemented for patients with CHD discharged after hospitalization for an ischemic event.

Interventions to improve adherence to lipid lowering medication

BACKGROUND

Lipid lowering drugs are still widely underused, despite compelling evidence about their effectiveness in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Poor patient adherence to medication regimen is a major factor in the lack of success in treating hyperlipidaemia. In this review we focus on interventions, which encourage patients at risk of heart disease or stroke to take lipid lowering medication regularly.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of interventions aiming at improved adherence to lipid lowering drugs, focusing on measures of adherence and clinical outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo and CINAHL. Date of most recent search was in February 2003. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of adherence-enhancing interventions to lipid lowering medication in adults for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in an ambulatory setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently and assessed studies according to criteria outlined by the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook.

MAIN RESULTS

The eight studies found contained data on 5943 patients. Interventions could be stratified into four categories : 1. simplification of drug regimen, 2. patient information/education, 3. intensified patient care such as reminding and 4. complex behavioural interventions such as group sessions. Change in adherence ranged from -3% to 25% (decrease in adherence by 3% to increase in adherence by 25%). Three studies reported significantly improved adherence through simplification of drug regimen (category 1), improved patient information/education (category 2) and reminding (category 3). The fact that the successful interventions were evenly spread across the categories, does not suggest any advantage of one particular type of intervention. The methodological and analytical quality was generally low and results have to be considered with caution. Combining data was not appropriate due to the substantial heterogeneity between included randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

At this stage, no specific intervention aimed at improving adherence to lipid lowering drugs can be recommended. The lack of a gold standard method of measuring adherence is one major barrier in adherence research. More reliable data might be achieved by newer methods of measurement, more consistency in adherence assessment and longer duration of follow-up. Increased patient-centredness with emphasis on the patient's perspective and shared-decision-making might lead to more conclusive answers when searching for tools to encourage patients to take lipid lowering medication.

[Efficacy of an intervention to improve treatment compliance in hyperlipidemias]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy of the intervention through a telephone call about patients' compliance with lipaemia therapy.

DESIGN

Controlled, randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

Ten clinics at 6 primary care centres.

PARTICIPANTS

126 people diagnosed with hypercholesterolaemia according to Spanish Consensus criteria were chosen.

INTERVENTION

Two groups were formed. The control group (CG) of 63 patients, who received the doctor's normal treatment; and the Intervention group (IG) of 63 patients, who received in addition a telephone call at 2 weeks, 2 months and 4 months.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Pills were counted and cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C and LDL-C determined at the start, and at the third and sixth months. Percentages of patients complying (80%-110%), the mean compliance percentage and the degree of control were compared. The reduction of absolute and relative risk (RAR and RRR) and the mean number of people that required an intervention in order to avoid non-compliance (NI) were calculated.

RESULTS

115 people (91.26%) completed the survey, 56 in the IG and 59 in the CG. 77.1% complied with the therapy (CI, 68.4-85.8), (CG=64.4%, CI, 55.3-73.5; IG=93.5%, CI, 88.8-98 [P<.001]). Mean compliance ran at 88.7 +/- 10.2 overall, at 84.4 +/- 12.8 in the CG and at 93 +/- 8.2 in the IG (P<.001). The RAR was 29.1%, the RRR 81%, and the NI was 3.43 patients. The patients controlled ran at 43.9% in the IG (CI, 34.9-52.9) and 23.1% in the CG (CI, 15.4-30.8) (P<.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The telephone intervention is an efficacious way of improving the percentage of patients complying with lipaemia treatment.

Lipid-lowering therapy: strategies for improving compliance

Lowering cholesterol levels is a primary approach for reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), yet patients rarely achieve the lipid targets recommended by international guidelines. Although high rates of compliance and achievement of lipid targets have been reported in clinical trials, this situation is infrequently reproduced in regular practice. This sub-optimal lipid management has clinical consequences as patients will not gain the full benefit of treatment. Poor compliance with therapeutic lifestyle changes and/or lipid-lowering agents is thought to contribute to the failure of patients in clinical practice to achieve lipid targets, and therefore this problem needs to be addressed. Several approaches may be used to improve compliance, including the prescription of efficacious, well-tolerated agents, educating patients about the necessity of therapy, and regular follow-up to monitor compliance and achievement of goals. However, educating patients to promote compliant behaviour can be time-consuming and therefore the support of other health-care workers, where available, can prove invaluable. Compliance initiatives using educational materials, access to helplines and regular telephone contact with a qualified health-care worker may also improve adherence with therapy. Further studies into the causes of poor compliance and methods of improving adherence with lipid-lowering agents are required.

Bridging the Treatment Gap: Improving Compliance With Lipid-Modifying Agents and Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes

Despite the large burden of cardiovascular disease on society, abnormal lipid levels, which are associated with an increase in coronary heart disease mortality, are not being adequately managed in many individuals. Poor patient compliance with therapeutic lifestyle changes and lipid-modifying therapies contribute to this treatment gap. If management of lipid levels is to reduce cardiovascular mortality effectively, poor compliance with treatment needs to be understood and addressed. Educating and motivating patients to understand the need for compliance with continued therapy is an important step for ensuring that the benefits of lipid management cited in clinical trials are translated to the general population. This will require a proactive approach from both patients and physicians. Well-tolerated and effective therapies may also help compliance by reducing the incidence of side effects and the need for complex dosing regimens. Suboptimal treatment of lipid levels is currently limiting the effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease; methods for improving compliance should be a key strategy to overcoming this problem.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmaceutical care in a medicare drug benefit program

OBJECTIVES

Although there has recently been substantial interest in a Medicare drug benefit program, little attention has focused on ensuring improved access to medication monitoring for Medicare beneficiaries. Using a societal perspective, we evaluated the impact pharmacists could have on inappropriate prescribing, patient compliance, and medication-related morbidity and mortality within a Medicare drug benefits program.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was performed. A comprehensive MEDLINE search for relevant literature identified data sources and model parameters.

RESULTS

In the base case, a pharmaceutical care benefit in the elderly population would cost US dollars 2100 (year 2000 prices) per life-year saved, which is highly cost-effective. Reasonable changes in model parameters did not raise the cost-effectiveness ratio above US dollars 13000 per life-year saved.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations in both the quantity and the specificity of data available, pharmaceutical care appears to be a highly cost-effective augmentation to a Medicare drug benefit program. This result is robust to model parameter changes. This model is conservative in that it does not include ongoing benefits from medication monitoring or increased elderly drug utilization and polypharmacy as the Medicare drug program is phased in.

Interventions to improve medication compliance in older patients living in the community: a systematic review of the literature

Noncompliance affects all age groups, but older patients have specific barriers against effective medication use and can be more vulnerable to the incorrect use of medication. Some age-related barriers are vision loss and cognitive impairment. In people aged 60 years or older, noncompliance with medication regimens varies from 26-59%. In this article we review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions aimed to improve compliance with medication regimens in older patients living in the community. It is known from other reviews that multifaceted interventions, a combination of interventions, are more often effective than single-focus interventions, probably because these address a wider range of barriers. Also, an individual approach with specifically tailored interventions is effective at improving compliance. In this review the following two hypotheses are evaluated: i) multifaceted interventions improve compliance more successfully than single interventions; and ii) interventions that are tailored to patients improve compliance more successfully than generalised interventions. A systematic literature search in four databases produced 14 suitable RCTs with 23 interventions that we categorised as single or multifaceted, and generalised or tailored. Differences in medication compliance between the intervention group and the control group were in less than half of the comparisons in favour of the intervention group. Telephone-linked reminder systems achieved the most striking effect, looking at differences between the intervention and control group, and deserve further attention. Overall, multifaceted interventions and tailored interventions seemed to result more often in differences in compliance rates in older adults in favour of the intervention group compared with a control group than single and generalised interventions.

Provision of drug information to patients by pharmacists: the impact of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 a decade later

Drug-related illness in the United States factors substantially in health care costs, although often these illnesses and their attendant costs are preventable. One strategy for minimizing adverse drug reactions is to provide drug information to consumers in the form of prescription counseling at pharmacies. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 1990) contained provisions for mandating such counseling to Medicaid patients. OBRA 1990 was implemented in 1993, but most states acted quickly to extend counseling services to all patients receiving prescription drugs. We looked at the extent and quality of prescription counseling available in community pharmacies 1 decade after OBRA 1990 was written. We evaluated the counseling services afforded at large chain pharmacies, independent community pharmacies, and on-line pharmacies for a hydrochlorothiazide prescription. We found that most (69%) pharmacies offered to provide prescription counseling service, and that average counseling index scores, a measure of the quality or extent of information provided as determined by a Rasch analysis, were generally satisfactory. Our observations based on a single prescription for hydrochlorothiazide, along with other studies, suggest that there is a positive upward trend in the number of pharmacies providing prescription drug information, and that the extent of information provided suggests that the objectives of OBRA 1990 and related legislation to reduce ADRs are being fundamentally satisfied.

Physician-prompting statin therapy intervention improves outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a posthospital discharge intervention that prompted physicians to increase the use and effectiveness of statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

Participants were 612 patients with CHD who were admitted to a coronary care unit. The control group (303 patients admitted from October 1-December 31, 1998) received no follow-up intervention. The intervention group (309 patients admitted fromJanuary 1-March 31, 1999) had follow-up letters sent or phone calls made to their primary care physicians with patient-specific recommendations concerning assessment of lipid profiles and statin therapy. Over a 2-year follow-up period, assessment of lipid profiles, use of therapy, and adverse clinical outcomes were compared between the control and intervention groups.

RESULTS

At hospital discharge, there was no significant difference in the use of statins between the groups. At each reported follow-up interval, the percentages of patients having lipid profiles measured, being treated with a statin, receiving titrated dosages of a statin, and achieving low-density lipid (LDL) cholesterol goals set by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) were significantly greater in the intervention group compared with the control group (all p<0.05). At the end of the 2-year follow-up period, nearly three-fourths (72%) of the intervention group were receiving a statin, compared with 43% of the control group. In addition, 55% of the intervention group achieved their NCEP LDL goal, compared with only 10% of the control group. Recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalization for myocardial ischemia, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular mortality were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

A relatively simple physician-prompting intervention significantly increased assessment of lipid status, frequency of statin use, achievement of LDL treatment goals, and titration of lipid drug dosages. In addition, the improved use of statins significantly reduced adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This intervention tool should be more broadly applied in patient populations eligible to receive these agents.