Complications associated with pedicle screws

Safety and Efficacy of All-In-One Percutaneous Pedicle Screw System

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of the prospectively collected outcomes data.

OBJECTIVE

The indications for PPS placement during minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) procedures have increased in recent years. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have documented the outcomes of PPS insertion using the all-in-one PPS system. This study compared the conventional methods and the use of all-in-one percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) system with respect to the speed and accuracy of PPS placement. We also determined the advantages associated with the use of the all-in-one PPS system.

METHODS

We evaluated 54 patients who underwent PPS insertion using the conventional method and the all-in-one PPS system during MISt procedures. We also assessed the number of implanted PPSs, the time taken to implant PPSs, and the accuracy of PPS placement based on postoperative computed tomography images.

RESULTS

A total of 254 PPSs were inserted (126 using the conventional method and 128 using the all-in-one PPS system). The PPS insertion time with the all-in-one PPS system (mean, 25.3 ± 9.1 s) was significantly shorter than that using the conventional method (mean, 63.1 ± 13.0 s; P < 0.01). With respect to the accuracy of PPS insertion, ≥ 2 mm pedicle breach was noted in one case each in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PPS placement using the all-in-one PPS system is as safe as conventional methods and has the potential to save the surgical time of MISt procedures.

Higher pedicle screw density does not improve curve correction in Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Purpose

Higher pedicle screw density posterior spinal fusion (PSF) constructs have not been shown to result in improved curve correction in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) but do increase cost. The purpose of this study questioned whether higher screw density constructs improved curve correction and maintenance of correction in Lenke 2 AIS. Secondary goals were to identify predictive factors for correction and postoperative magnitude of curves in Lenke 2 AIS.

Methods

We identified patients 11 to 17 years old who underwent primary PSF for Lenke 2 AIS between 2007 and 2017 who had minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographic and radiographic data were collected to perform regression and elimination analysis.

Results

Thirty patients (21 females, 9 males) were analyzed. Average age and SD at time of surgery was 14.0 ± 1.8 years (range, 11–17 years), and median follow-up was 2.8 years (IQR 2.1–4.0 years). Implant density did not predict final postoperative curve magnitude. Predictors of final postoperative curve magnitude were sex and preoperative curve magnitude. Predictors of percentage of correction of major curve were sex and age at the time of surgery. Predictors of final postoperative thoracic kyphosis were sex and percent flexibility preop. Females had lower final postoperative major curve magnitude, a higher percent curve correction, and lower postoperative thoracic kyphosis.

Conclusions

Increased implant density is not predictive of postoperative curve magnitude in Lenke 2 AIS. Predictors of postoperative curve magnitude are sex and preoperative curve magnitude.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective observational

Optimal "Low" Pedicle Screw Stimulation Threshold to Predict New Postoperative Lower-Extremity Neurologic Deficits During Lumbar Spinal Fusions

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown that pedicle screw stimulation thresholds ≤6-8 mA yield a high diagnostic accuracy of detecting misplaced screws. Our objective was to determine the optimal "low" stimulation threshold to predict new postoperative neurologic deficits and identify additional risk factors associated with deficits.

METHODS

We included patients with complete pedicle screw stimulation testing who underwent posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgeries from 2010-2012. We calculated the diagnostic accuracy of pedicle screw responses of ≤4 mA, ≤6 mA, ≤8 mA, ≤10 mA, ≤12 mA, and ≤20 mA to predict new postoperative lower-extremity (LE) neurologic deficits. We used multivariate modeling to determine the best logistic regression model to predict LE deficits and identify additional risk factors. Statistics software packages used were Python3.8.5, NumPy 1.19.1, Pandas 1.1.1, and SPSS26.

RESULTS

We studied 1179 patients who underwent 8584 pedicle screw stimulations with somatosensory evoked potential and free-run electromyographic monitoring for posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Twenty-five (2.1%) patients had new LE neurologic deficits. A stimulation threshold of ≤8 mA had a sensitivity/specificity of 32%/90% and a diagnostic odds ratio/area under the curve of 4.34 [95% confidence interval: 1.83, 10.27]/0.61 [0.49, 0.74] in predicting postoperative deficit. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who had pedicle screws with stimulation thresholds ≤8 mA are 3.15 [1.26, 7.83]× more likely to have postoperative LE deficits while patients who have undergone a revision lumbar spinal fusion surgery are 3.64 [1.38, 9.61]× more likely.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that low thresholds are indicative of not only screw proximity to the nerve but also an increased likelihood of postoperative neurologic deficit. Thresholds ≤8 mA prove to be the optimal "low" threshold to help guide a correctly positioned pedicle screw placement and detect postoperative deficits.

Lumbar Intervertebral Spacer With Cement Augmentation of Endplates and Integrated Screws as a Fixation Device in an Osteoporotic Model: An In Vitro Kinematic and Load-to-Failure Study

BACKGROUND

Integrated lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) devices have been shown to successfully stabilize the spine and avoid complications related to posterior fixation. However, LLIF has increased subsidence risk in osteoporotic patients. Cement augmentation through cannulated pedicle screws enhances pedicle fixation and cage-endplate interface yet involves a posterior approach. Lateral application of cement with integrated LLIF fixation has been introduced and requires characterization. The present study set out to evaluate kinematic and load-to-failure properties of a novel cement augmentation technique with an integrated LLIF device, alone and with unilateral pedicle fixation, compared with bilateral pedicle screws and nonintegrated LLIF (BPS + S).

METHODS

Twelve specimens (L3-S1) underwent discectomy at L4-L5. Specimens were separated into 3 groups: (1) BPS + S; (2) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) augmentation, integrated LLIF, and unilateral pedicle screws (PMMA + UPS + iS); and (3) PMMA and integrated LLIF (PMMA + iSA) without posterior fixation. Flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were applied. A compressive load was applied to L4-L5 segments until failure. An analysis was performed (P < .05).

RESULTS

Operative constructs significantly reduced motion relative to intact specimens in all motion planes (P < .05). BPS + S provided the most stability, reducing motion by 71.6%-86.4%, followed by PMMA + UPS + iS (68.1%-79.4%) and PMMA + iSA (62.9%-81.9%); no significant differences were found (P > .05). PMMA + UPS + iS provided the greatest resistance to failure (2290 N), followed by PMMA + iSA (1970 N) and BPS + S (1390 N); no significant differences were observed (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cement augmentation of vertebral endplates via the lateral approach with integrated LLIF moderately improved cage-endplate strength compared to BPS + S in an osteoporotic model; unilateral pedicle fixation further improved failure load. Reconstruction before and after application of unilateral pedicle screws and rods was biomechanically equivalent to anteroposterior reconstruction. Overall, initial results suggest that integrated LLIF with cement augmentation may be a viable alternative in the presence of osteoporosis.

Assessment of pedicle screw malposition in uniplanar versus multiplanar spinal deformities in children

Background

Spinal deformities can either be uniplanar or multiplanar. The current study aims to compare mal-positioned pedicle screw assessment on radiographs versus CT in children <12 years with multiplanar and uniplanar spinal deformities.

Methods

A cohort of 15 children, mean age 10.1 years, who underwent posterior spinal fusion using free-hand pedicle screw insertion for multiplanar (M) or uniplanar (U) deformities with post-operative radiograph and CT evaluation of 154 screws. The outcome measures included the assessment of malpositions detected on plain radiographs versus CT scans in U and M deformities. The overall breaches in post-operative plain radiographs and CT in each group were compared and analyzed by two independent observers.

The mal-positioned screws were graded on extent of cortical breach on CT. Inter and intra-observer variability was calculated with Kappa(k) method. Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were calculated by comparing breaches on radiographs versus CT considered the gold standard.

Results

In total,154 pedicle screws were analyzed, 65 in U group and 89 in M group. There were 23 (14.9%) malpositioned screws identified on plain radiographs and 43 (27.9%) on CT (p = 0.008). There were 17/154 (11.03%) Grade 1 breaches, 16/154 (10.38%) Grade 2 breaches and 10/154(6.49%) Grade III breaches.

Among the 43 CT breaches, 12/65 (18.46%) were in U group, 31/89 (34.83%) were in M group (p = 0.013).The overall Sensitivity, Specificity and PPV of plain radiographs compared to CT in detecting malpositions were 32.56%, 91.89% and 60.87% respectively.

Conclusions

There was a significant discrepancy in identification of pedicle screw malposition based on plain radiographic versus CT based assessment, more so in multiplanar deformities. The ability to detect a breach on plain radiographs is lesser in multiplanar versus uniplanar deformities.

Evaluation of the implantation of transpedicular screws in spinal instrumentation with free-hand technique and navigation-assisted with intraoperative computed tomography: An analytical-positional study

BACKGROUND

Spinal instrumentation using transpedicular screws has been used for decades to stabilize the spine. In October 2018, an intraoperative CT system was acquired in the Neurosurgery service of the University Hospital Complex of Vigo, this being the first model of these characteristics in the Spanish Public Health System, so we began a study from January 2015 to December 2019 to assess the precision of the transpedicular screws implanted with this system compared with a control group performed with the classical technique and final fluoroscopic control.

METHODS

The study was carried out in patients who required transpedicular instrumentation surgery, in total 655 screws were placed, 339 using the free-hand technique (Group A) and 316 assisted with intraoperative CT navigation (Group B) (p>0.05). Demographic characteristics, related to surgery and the screw implantation grades were assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.

RESULTS

92 patients were evaluated, between 12 and 86 years (average: 57.1 years). 161 thoracic screws (24.6%) and 494 lumbo-sacral screws (75.4%) were implanted. Of the thoracic screws, 33 produced a pedicle rupture. For the lumbo-sacral screws, 71 have had pedicle violation. The overall correct positioning rate for the free-hand group was 72.6% and for the CT group it was 96.5% (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy rate is higher in thoracic-lumbar instrumentation in the navigation group versus free-hand group with fluoroscopic control.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Thresholds Less Than or Equal to 8 mA in Pedicle Screw Testing During Lumbar Spine Procedures to Predict New Postoperative Lower Extremity Neurological Deficits

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

It has been shown that pedicle screw stimulation thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA yield a very high diagnostic accuracy of detecting misplaced screws in spinal surgery. In our study, we determined clinical implications of low stimulation thresholds.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior lumbar spinal fusions (PSF), using pedicle screws, are performed to treat many spinal pathologies, but misplaced pedicle screws can result in new postoperative neurological deficits.

METHODS

Patients with pedicle screw stimulation testing who underwent PSF between 2010 and 2012 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) were included in the study. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to determine how effectively low pedicle screw responses predict new postoperative lower extremity neurological deficits.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred seventy nine eligible patients underwent 8584 pedicle screw stimulations with lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials (LE SSEP) monitoring for lumbar fusion surgery. One hundred twenty one of these patients had 187 pedicle screws with a stimulation response at a threshold less than or equal to 8 mA. Smoking had a significant correlation to pedicle screw stimulation less than or equal to 8 mA (P = 0.012). A threshold of less than or equal to 8 mA had a sensitivity/specificity of 0.32/0.90 with DOR of 4.34 [1.83, 10.27] and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.61 [0.49, 0.74]. Patients with screw thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA and abnormal baselines had a DOR of 9.8 [95% CI: 2.13-45.17] and an AUC of 0.73 [95% CI: 0.50-0.95].

CONCLUSION

Patients with pedicle screw stimulation thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA are 4.34 times more likely to have neurological clinical manifestations. Smoking and LE deficits were shown to be significantly correlated with pedicle screw stimulation thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA. Low stimulation thresholds result in a high specificity of 90%. Pedicle screw stimulation less than or equal to 8 mA can serve as an accurate rule in test for postoperative neurological deficit, warranting reevaluation of screw placement and/or replacement intraoperatively.Level of Evidence: 3.

Neurological events due to pedicle screw malpositioning with lateral fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion

OBJECTIVE

The risk of novel postoperative neurological events due to pedicle screw malpositioning in lumbar fusion surgery is minimized by using one of the several image-guided techniques for pedicle screw insertion. These techniques for guided screw insertion range from intraoperative fluoroscopy to intraoperative navigation. A practical technique consists of anatomical identification of the screw entry point followed by lateral fluoroscopy used for guidance during insertion of the screw. This technique is available in most clinics and is less expensive than intraoperative navigation. However, the safety of lateral fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement with regard to novel postoperative neurological events due to screw malposition has been addressed only rarely in the literature. In this study the authors aimed to determine the rate of novel postoperative neurological events due to intraoperative and postoperatively established screw malpositioning during lateral fluoroscopy-assisted screw insertion.

METHODS

Included patients underwent lateral fluoroscopy-assisted lumbosacral screw insertion between January 2012 and August 2017. The occurrence of novel postoperative neurological events was analyzed from patient files. In case of an event, surgical reports were screened for the occurrence of intraoperative screw malposition. Furthermore, postoperative CT scans were analyzed to identify and describe possible screw malposition.

RESULTS

In total, 246 patients with 1079 screws were included. Novel postoperative neurological events were present in 36 patients (14.6%). In 8 of these 36 patients (3.25% of the total study population), the neurological events could be directly attributed to screw malposition. Screw malpositioning was caused either by problematic screw insertion with immediate screw correction (4 patients) or by malpositioned screws for which the malposition was established postoperatively using CT scans (4 patients). Three patients with screw malposition underwent revision surgery without subsequent symptom relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral fluoroscopy-assisted lumbosacral screw placement results in low rates of novel postoperative neurological events caused by screw malposition. In the majority of patients suffering from novel postoperative neurological events, these events could not be attributed to screw malpositioning, but rather were due to postoperative neurapraxia of peripheral nerves, neuropathy, or intraoperative traction of nerve roots.

Imaging Evaluation of the Spinal Hardware: What Residents and Fellows Need to Know

We provide a comprehensive review of the purpose and expected imaging findings of different types of spinal instrumentation. We also demonstrate the imaging evaluation for optimal positioning and assessment of hardware failure.

Surgeons' Learning Curve of Renaissance Robotic Surgical System

INTRODUCTION

A few articles on robot-assisted pedicle screw placement described the learning curve but failed to report on the overall operative time, including cases in which the robotic system malfunctioned. The purpose of this study was to identify a single surgeon's learning curve including estimated blood loss, surgery time, anesthesia time, robot time, and complications.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed between January 2016 and August 2018 for patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion using the Mazor robot. Based on the charts, the robot time, time of anesthesia, and surgery time were recorded, as were the complications, misplacement of screws, and blood loss.

RESULTS

Of 62 robot-assisted surgeries scheduled, only 46 were performed (74.2%) upon patients with a mean age of 63.3 ± 13.0 years. The mean follow-up time was 13.2 ± 8.0 months and most commonly a fusion from L4 to S1 was performed (20/46, 43.5%). A high improvement in estimated intraoperative blood loss was observed of 755.7 ± 344.7 mL (slope = -9.89). A decrease in time in anesthesia, surgery, and robotic usage was identified with a slope factor of -3.64 (R ² = .22, SE = 85.4, P < .005), -3.97 (R ² = 0.30, SE 75.8, P < .005), -0.69 (R ² = .07, SE = 27.8, P < .09), respectively. Furthermore, a decrease in pedicle screw insertion time and operative time was found (slope = -0.05, R ² = .02, SE = 3.4, P = .37). In total, 5 major complications (cases 8, 19, 21, 35, 43) and 6 minor complications (cases 4, 14, 15, 20, 29), were identified (21.7%) without any learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot pedicle screw insertion shows no major learning curve; however, the blood loss and the installation process of the system improved with experience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Novel C-arm based planning spine surgery robot proved in a porcine model and quantitative accuracy assessment methodology

BACKGROUND

We assessed pedicle screw accuracy utilizing a novel navigation-based spine surgery robotic system by comparing planned pathways with placed pathways in a porcine model.

METHODS

We placed three mini screws per vertebra for accuracy evaluation and used a reference frame for registration in four pigs (46 screws in 23 vertebrae). We planned screw paths and performed screw insertion under robot guidance. Using C-arm and CT images, we evaluated accuracy by comparing the 3D distance of the placed screw head/tip from the planned screw head/tip and 3D angular offset.

RESULTS

Mean registration deviation between the preoperative 3D space (C-arm) and postoperative CT scans was 0.475 ± 0.119 mm. The average offset from preoperative plan to final placement was 4.8 ± 2.0 mm from the head (tail), 5.3 ± 2.3 mm from the tip and 3.9 ± 2.4 degrees of angulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our spine surgery robot showed good accuracy in executing an intended planned trajectory and screw path. This faster and more accurate robotic system will be applied in future studies, first in cadavers and subsequently in the clinical field.

Updated Understanding of the Degenerative Disc Diseases - Causes Versus Effects - Treatments, Studies and Hypothesis

BACKGROUND

In this review we survey medical treatments and research strategies, and we discuss why they have failed to cure degenerative disc diseases or even slow down the degenerative process.

OBJECTIVE

We seek to stimulate discussion with respect to changing the medical paradigm associated with treatments and research applied to degenerative disc diseases.

METHOD PROPOSAL

We summarize a Biological Transformation therapy for curing chronic inflammations and degenerative disc diseases, as was previously described in the book Biological Transformations controlled by the Mind Volume 1.

PRELIMINARY STUDIES

A single-patient case study is presented that documents complete recovery from an advanced lumbar bilateral discopathy and long-term hypertrophic chronic rhinitis by application of the method proposed.

CONCLUSION

Biological transformations controlled by the mind can be applied by men and women in order to improve their quality of life and cure degenerative disc diseases and chronic inflammations illnesses.

Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A χ² test and I² statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I² = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I² indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.

Transabdominal Motor Action Potential Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement During Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures: A Case Study

Precise pedicle screw placement is a critical skill during minimally invasive spinal surgeries but can pose various challenges. Techniques such as electromyography (EMG) have been traditionally utilized for this purpose but have several shortcomings. Transabdominal motor action potential (TaMAP) has been examined as a possible effective neuromonitoring alternative and is hypothesized to provide important data on symptomatic malpositioned pedicle screws. The current study seeks to determine whether TaMAP may be an advantageous technique in the neuromonitoring of percutaneous pedicle screw placement during minimally invasive spinal procedures. The methodology involved recording TaMAP signals at the outset and the conclusion of spinal surgical procedures in human participants, for which comparisons were made of pre- and post-operative data. Results revealed that TaMAP signals remained stable during accurate pedicle screw placement and degraded during a case of inaccurate placement, for which initial misplaced hardware altered the depolarization threshold and resulted in substantial signal alteration. These results suggest that TaMAP, which is stable, repeatable, and reflects real-time information, can potentially be used as a reliable and more precise indication of accuracy in pedicle screw placement during spinal surgeries. This is the first TaMAP study conducted in human participants.

INTRA- AND INTEROBSERVER ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT IN SCOLIOSIS CORRECTION

ABSTRACT Objective To establish the statistical interobserver and intraobserver concordance of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis surgery, with a 4-week interval between the two analyses. Methods Of 55 patients that evaluated the intra- and interobserver concordances of the screw positions (according to the Abul-Kasim classification) using the Kappa coefficient. Results The intraobserver concordance ranged from a Kappa coefficient of 0.516 to 0.889 (“moderate” to “almost perfect”) between the two analyses performed four weeks apart. Interobserver concordance ranged from 0.379 to 0.633 (“reasonable” to “strong”). Conclusion The intraobserver concordance was always greater than the interobserver concordance. No concordance coefficient was classified as “insignificant” or “weak”. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective study.

Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions.

METHODS

We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000-2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge.

RESULTS

MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (>65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.

Image-Guided Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery

Image guidance (IG) and robotics systems are becoming more widespread in their utilization and can be invaluable intraoperative adjuncts during spine surgery. Both are highly reliant upon stereotaxy and either pre- or intraoperative radiographic imaging. While user-operated IG systems have been commercially available longer and subsequently are more widely utilized across centers, robotics systems provide unique theoretical advantages over freehand and IG techniques for placing instrumentation within the spine. While there is a growing plethora of data showing that IG and robotic systems decrease the incidence of malpositioned screws, less is known about their impact on clinical outcomes. Both robotics and IG may be of particular value in cases of substantial deformity or complex anatomy. Indications for the use of these systems continue to expand with an increasing body of literature justifying their use in not only guiding thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement, but also in cases of cervical and pelvic instrumentation as well as spinal tumor resection. Both techniques also offer the potential benefit of reducing occupational exposures to ionizing radiation for the operating room staff, the surgeon, and the patient. As the use of IG and robotics in spine surgery continues to expand, these systems' value in improving surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes must be weighed against concerns over cost and workflow. As newer systems incorporating both real-time IG and robotics become more utilized, further research is necessary to better elucidate situations where these systems may be particularly beneficial in spine surgery.

Persistent postoperative pain and healthcare costs associated with instrumented and non-instrumented spinal surgery: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To compare rates of persistent postoperative pain (PPP) after lumbar spine surgery-commonly known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome-and healthcare costs for instrumented lumbar spinal fusion versus decompression/discectomy.

METHODS

The UK population-based healthcare data from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database from NHS Digital and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) were queried to identify patients with PPP following lumbar spinal surgery. Rates of PPP were calculated by type of surgery (instrumented and non-instrumented). Total healthcare costs associated with the surgery and covering the 24-month period after index hospital discharge were estimated using standard methods for classifying health care encounters into major categories of health care resource utilization (i.e., inpatient hospital stays, outpatient clinic visits, accident and emergency attendances, primary care encounters, and medications prescribed in primary care) and applying the appropriate unit costs (expressed in 2013 GBP).

RESULTS

Increasing the complexity of surgery with instrumentation was not associated with an increased rate of PPP. However, 2-year healthcare costs following discharge after surgery are significantly higher among patients who underwent instrumented surgery compared with decompression/discectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a not insubstantial risk of ongoing pain following spine surgery, with 1-in-5 patients experiencing PPP within 2 years of surgery, the underlying indications for surgical modality and related choice of surgical procedure do not, by itself, appear to be a driving factor.

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion for unilateral open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a side-by-side comparison of percutaneous and conventional open techniques in the same patients

Background

The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion (P-side) with that of conventional open screw insertion (O-side) during unilateral open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the same patients. We also sought to determine the incidence of pedicle screw misplacement and to identify relevant risk factors.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 766 pedicle screws placed in 181 consecutive patients who underwent a unilateral open-TLIF procedure in the lumbosacral spine. Our minimally invasive TLIF was performed by unilateral open freehand insertion of pedicle screws for decompression on one side and PPS on the opposite side. Using this approach, we were able to compare the accuracy of PPS insertion with that of conventional open screw insertion in the same patients. There were 383 PPSs and 383 screws inserted by the open method. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated on reconstructed computed tomography images obtained postoperatively, and screw misplacement was classified. Potential risk factors for screw misplacement were investigated in three-level mixed-effects logistic regression analysis.

Results

Thirty-four screws (8.9%) were misplaced on the P-side and 37 (9.5%) were misplaced on the O-side; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.803). Subclassification analysis revealed minor perforation of 28 screws (7.3%) on the P-side and 32 (8.4%) on the O-side, moderate perforation of 5 screws (1.3%) on the P-side and 4 (1.0%) on the O-side, and severe perforation of 1 screw (0.3%) on each side. Three-level mixed-effects logistic regression analysis identified body mass index as a significant risk factor for screw misplacement on the P-side (odds ratio 1.194, 95% confidence interval 1.066–1.338).

Conclusions

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion was not significantly different between PPS insertion and conventional open screw insertion in the same patients. Body mass index had a significant influence on the risk of screw misplacement in PPS insertion.

Complex biomechanical properties of non-augmented and augmented pedicle screws in human vertebrae with reduced bone density

Background

In osteoporotic bone, the quality of the bone-to-implant interface is decreased, which may lead to early implant failure. Screw anchorage can be improved by augmentation. This effect is mainly investigated with a pull-out test. To our knowledge, the effect of cement augmentation in an in vivo physiological setup focusing on screw movement has not been investigated to date. The aim of this work was to investigate and compare augmented and native screw behavior in a physiologically related setup.

Methods

Twelve fresh-frozen human lumbar vertebrae were divided into two groups. Each vertebra was bilaterally instrumented with either non-augmented or augmented pedicle screw systems and loaded in a recently developed test setup that provided cyclic conditions comparable to a physiological gait. The cyclic loading should test the primary implant stability, comparable to the postoperative period of two months in a worst-case scenario in the absence of osseous remodeling. Screws were tracked optically, and screw movement and failure patterns were observed.

Results

Mutual influence between the left and right sides resulted in a successive, rather than simultaneous, failure. Augmentation of the screws in vertebrae with poor bone quality reduced screw subsidence and thus improved the rigidity of the screw-to-implant interface by up to six-fold. The non-augmented condition was significantly related to early screw failure.

Conclusions

Pedicle screw system failure involves a complex bilateral-coupled mechanism. The cyclic loading based on physiological conditions during walking has allowed the postoperative conditions and clinical failure mechanisms to be simulated in vitro and clarified. Future implant systems should be investigated with a physiologically related setup.

Clinical efficacy of Bone Cement-injectable Cannulated Pedicle Screw Short Segment Fixation for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Osteoporosise

Many clinical studies have shown a satisfactory clinical efficacy using bone cement-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine, however, few studies have involved the application of this type of screw in lumbar spondylolisthesis. This study aims to investigate the mid-term clinical outcome of bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) in lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis. From 2011 to 2015, twenty-three patients with transforminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using CICPS for lumbar spondylolisthesis were enrolled in the study. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate faunctional recovery and physical pain; and operation time, blood loss and hospitalization time were recorded, respectively. Radiograph and computed tomography of lumbar spine was performed to assess loss of the intervertebral disc space height, fixation loosening, and the rate of bony fusion. The average follow-up time of 23 patients was 22.5 ± 10.2 months (range, 6–36 months). According to VAS and ODI scores, postoperative pain sensation and activity function were significantly improved (p < 0.05). The height of the intervertebral disc space was reduced by 0.4 ± 1.1 mm, and the bone graft fusion rate was 100%. No cases of internal fixation loosening or screw pullout was observed. CICPS using cement augmentation may suggest as a feasible surgical technique in osteoporotic patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

A preliminary study of a novel robotic system for pedicle screw fixation: A randomised controlled trial

Background and objective

Existing orthopaedic robotic systems are almost restricted to provide guidance for trajectory direction. In the present study, a novel spinal robotic system with automatic drilling power was introduced. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety in pedicle screw ​insertion of posterior lumbar interbody fusion assisted by this novel robotic system.

Methods and materials

A randomised controlled trial was conducted for 17 participants who were required posterior lumbar interbody fusion process. Seven (3 M/4 F) were randomly assigned to the robot-assisted group (RA group), and the other ten (4 M/6 F) were assigned to the conventional technique group (FH group). A novel robotic system was used in the RA group. All measurements were based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) data. Accuracy of screw insertion was determined using the Gertzbein and Robbins Scale. Precision was measured by the entry point deviation distance and the trajectory rotation. Other variables included operation time, radiation time, length of stay, and screw-related complications.

Result

A total of 82 pedicle screws were placed in the 17 participants. In the RA group, 90.6% of screws placed were Grade A, and 9.4% were Grade B. In the FH group, 78.0% of screws were Grade A, 20.0% were Grade B, and 2.0% were Grade C. No statistical difference was found in the operation time, radiation time per case, and length of stay between both groups. The radiation time per screw is significantly lower in the RA group. No screw-related complications or revision occurred in the present study.

Conclusion

The outcome of screw accuracy of this robotic system was comparable with that of experienced surgeons, and no screw-related complication was found in the RA group during hospitalisation. In addition, radiation time per screw in the robotic group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, which shows the potential to reduce radiation exposure of pedicle screw fixation assisted by this robotic system.

Translational potential

Our study shows that pedicle screw fixation assisted by "Orthbot" system is accurate and safe. It is concluded that this novel robotic system offers a new option for internal implantation in spine surgery.

Postoperative 320 multi-slice computed tomography in assessment of pedicle screw insertion in thoraco-lumbar fixation

Background

Pedicle screw instrumentation is used widely in lumbar spine for stabilization to enhance arthrodesis and has been accepted in the thoracic spine in recent years. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of postoperative 320 multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in assessment of pedicle screw placement in patients with spinal fixation with clinical and surgical correlation.

Results

A total of 340 pedicular screws were inserted to 70 cases. 286 (84.12%) were in, 54 screws (15.88%) were violated, and revision surgeries were required for 5 displaced screws. On axial, coronal reconstruction and three-dimensional (3D) reformatted CT images 36, 47, and 54 displaced screws were detected, respectively. Both sensitivity and specificity for 3D reformatted images were 100%. For axial image, they were 97.6% and 89.4%, respectively, compared with surgical findings in 5 revised screws.

Conclusion

Multi-slice CT scan is a valuable and valid postoperative assessment tool of accuracy of spinal pedicle screw placement.

Recent Trends, Technical Concepts and Components of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Systems: A Comprehensive Review

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems have become one of the most important and challenging types of system in clinical orthopedics, as they enable precise treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, employing modern clinical navigation systems and surgical tools. This paper brings a comprehensive review of recent trends and possibilities of CAOS systems. There are three types of the surgical planning systems, including: systems based on the volumetric images (computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound images), further systems utilize either 2D or 3D fluoroscopic images, and the last one utilizes the kinetic information about the joints and morphological information about the target bones. This complex review is focused on three fundamental aspects of CAOS systems: their essential components, types of CAOS systems, and mechanical tools used in CAOS systems. In this review, we also outline the possibilities for using ultrasound computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (UCAOS) systems as an alternative to conventionally used CAOS systems.

Biomechanical Comparison of Lumbar Motion Unit Stability Following Posterior Instrumentation with Facet Spacers and Facet Screws

Purpose

Lumbar posterior instrumentation for facet stabilization has become popular for the treatment of lumbar instability. The present study investigated and compared facet stabilization following lumbar posterior instrumentation with facet spacers and facet screws using porcine lumbar spines.

Methods

Eighteen L5–L6 lumbar motion units (LMUs) of the porcine spines were randomly divided into three groups (un-instrumented, facet-spacer and facet-screw). In the un-instrumented group (control), all ligamentous structures were preserved. In the facet-spacer group, two facet spacers were inserted into the joint spaces of the bilateral upper and lower facets. In the facet-screw group, two cannulated screws were used to transfix the bilateral upper and lower facets. With the use of a material testing machine, a gradually increasing moment of up to 6000 N-mm was generated in flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion motions to compare facet stabilization among the groups.

Results

The facet-spacer group was significantly stiffer than the facet-screw group in extension (p = 0.013), whereas the facet-screw group was significantly stiffer than the facet-spacer group in axial rotation (p = 0.004). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two fixation techniques in flexion (p = 0.284) and lateral bending (p = 0.085).

Conclusion

Both facet-spacer and facet-screw fixation techniques significantly improve stability in a single LMU. Facet-spacer fixation provided better stabilization in extension, while facet-screw fixation provided better stabilization in axial rotation.

Double layers of gold nanoparticles immobilized titanium implants improve the osseointegration in rabbit models

Osseointegration is important in osteopenia and osteoporosis patients due to their low bone densities. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are greatly beneficial materials as osteogenic agents. The aim of this study is to investigate osseointegration between bones and double layers of GNP-immobilized titanium (Ti) implants. The physicochemical properties of the Ti surface were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, by atomic force microscopy, by means of the contact angle using water drops, and by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Osteogenic differentiation of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells was analyzed and showed the higher values in double layers of GNP (GNP2) groups. In addition, we performed an in vivo study using hydroxyapatite (HA) and GNP2 spine pedicle screws in ovariectomized (OVX) and SHAM rabbits. Osseointegration parameters also showed higher values in GNP2 than in HA groups. These findings suggest that implants with double layers of GNPs can be a useful alternative in osteoporotic patients.

Conventional Versus Stereotactic Image-guided Pedicle Screw Placement During Posterior Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study of a National Longitudinal Database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis on a national longitudinal database between 2007 and 2016.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare complication rates, revision rates, and payment differences between navigated and conventional posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) procedures with instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Stereotactic navigation techniques for spinal instrumentation have been widely demonstrated to improve screw placement accuracies and decrease perforation rates when compared to conventional fluoroscopic and free-hand techniques. However, the clinical utility of navigation for instrumented PLF remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective laminectomy and instrumented PLF were stratified into "single level" and "3- to 6-level" cohorts. Navigation and conventional groups within each cohort were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching, resulting in 1786 navigated and conventional patients in the single-level cohort and 2060 in the 3 to 6 level cohort. Outcomes were compared using bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

For the single-level cohort, there were no significant differences in rates of complications, readmissions, revisions, and length of stay between the navigation and conventional groups. For the 3- to 6-level cohort, length of stay was significantly longer in the navigation group (P < 0.0001). Rates of readmissions were, however, greater for the conventional group (30-day: P = 0.0239; 90-day: P = 0.0449). Overall complications were also greater for the conventional group (P = 0.0338), whereas revision rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Total payments were significantly greater for the navigation group in both the single level and 3- to 6-level cohorts (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although use of navigation for 3- to 6-level instrumented PLF was associated with increased length of stay and payments, the concurrent decreased overall complication and readmission rates alluded to its potential clinical utility. However, for single-level instrumented PLF, no differences in outcomes were found between groups, suggesting that the value in navigation may lie in more complex procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Endoscopy-Assisted Diagnosis and Revision of a Malpositioned Screw

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw insertion is a common procedure in spine surgery, and freehand, fluoroscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques all are used. These are indirect methods that use fluoroscopy, and direct visualization of canal involvement has not been possible. However, owing to the development of high-definition imaging modalities, delicate procedures that use endoscopy are possible.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 47-year-old man presented with severe radiating pain in his leg after undergoing L5-S1 level endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicular screw fixation. The patient then underwent an endoscopy-assisted technique for violated spinal canal and screw revision in which the misplaced screw was directly visualized using endoscopy and the trajectory of the misplaced screw was changed. With 30° endoscopy, we directly visualized the screw thread and root compression. Then with 0° endoscopy, we changed the screw trajectory inside the pedicle with an anatomic landmark. The patient's radiating pain was completely relieved after revision of the malpositioned screw. Postoperative imaging showed the revised screw trajectory inside the pedicle.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion does not require an additional incision, and early recovery after the procedure is possible. Accurate diagnosis of canal pathology and treatment are possible with direct visualization using endoscopy.

Intraoperative tension pneumothorax during posterior vertebral column resection in a child with congenital scoliosis

Background:

Intraoperative tension pneumothorax (TPT) is extremely rare in spinal surgery overall and particularly in extensive deformity procedures. Here, we report a TPT occurring in conjunction with posterior vertebral column resection (pVCR) for the treatment of congenital scoliosis.

Case Description:

A 12-year-old female undergoing congenital thoracic scoliosis surgery (e.g., pVCR) developed abrupt intraoperative increases in airway pressure and compromised hemodynamics that led to a TPT. This was directly attributed to an inadvertent pleural tear. Temporary drainage of the accumulated air was accomplished with a urethral catheter inserted directly into the pleural cavity. This was later supplemented with a standard chest tube. The child quickly improved and was routinely discharged a few days later.

Conclusion:

In patients undergoing pVCR, if the surgical team is faced with unexplained hemodynamic instability and increased airway resistance, a TPT should be strongly suspected and appropriately managed.

The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery

As the number of advances in surgical techniques increases, it becomes increasingly important to assess and research the technology regarding spine surgery techniques in order to increase surgical accuracy, decrease overall length of surgery, and minimize overall radiation exposure. Currently, augmented reality and virtual reality have shown promising results in regard to their applicability beyond their current functions. At present, VR has been generally applied to a teaching and preparatory role, while AR has been utilized in surgical settings. As such, the following review attempts to provide an overview of both virtual reality and augmented reality, followed by a discussion of their current applications and future direction.

Biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation augmented with allograft bone particles in osteoporotic vertebrae: different sizes and amounts

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A persistent challenge in spine surgery is improving screw fixation in patients with poor bone quality. Augmenting pedicle screw fixation with allograft bone appears to be a promising approach.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical properties of screws augmented or revised with allograft bone particles (ABPs) and the effect of different sizes and amounts of ABP on screw-fixation strength.

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical in vitro study.

METHODS

Sixty vertebrae were separated randomly into six groups. Groups A1 and A2: one pedicle of each vertebra was selected randomly to be the original pedicle and implanted with a screw. Then, biomechanical tests were performed. Subsequently, the failed trajectory was revised with 1 mm ABP, and the contralateral pedicle was augmented with the same size and amount of ABP. Groups B1 and B2: two pedicles of each vertebra were augmented with different amounts of 1 mm ABP. Groups C1 and C2: one pedicle of each vertebra was augmented with 1 mm ABP to the maximum. The contralateral pedicle of each vertebra was augmented with the same amount of 2 mm ABP. After augmentation and screw insertion, groups A1, B1, and C1 were subjected to the pullout test, whereas groups A2, B2, and C2 the cyclic fatigue test.

RESULTS

Groups A1 and A2: screw augmentation increased the pullout strength by 47%, cycles to failure by 31%, and failure loads by 21% compared with the screw in the original pedicle (p<.05). Screw revision obtained 79% pullout strength, 97% cycles to failure, and 98% failure loads of the screw in the original pedicle (p<.05). Groups B1 and B2: full (100%) trajectory augmentation increased the pullout strength by 39%, cycles to failure by 18%, and failure loads by 12% compared with half (50%) trajectory augmentation (p<.05). Groups C1 and C2: the values of the pullout strength, cycles to failure, and failure loads of the screw augmented with 1 mm ABP were all greater than those in the 2 mm ABP. However, no significant differences were observed between the two treatments (p>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Trajectory augmentation with ABP can significantly increase the strength of the augmented screws. Full trajectory augmentation can provide greater strength compared with half trajectory augmentation. In patients with osteoporosis, we recommend using 1 mm ABP in full trajectory augmentation (0.3 g ABP for 5.5 mm×40 mm and 0.5 g ABP for 6.5 mm×45 mm) before trajectory fails.

State of the union: a review of lumbar fusion indications and techniques for degenerative spine disease

Lumbar fusion is an accepted and effective technique for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The practice has evolved continually since Albee and Hibbs independently reported the first cases in 1913, and advancements in both technique and patient selection continue through the present day. Clinical and radiological indications for surgery have been tested in trials, and other diagnostic modalities have developed and been studied. Fusion practices have also advanced; instrumentation, surgical approaches, biologics, and more recently, operative planning, have undergone stark changes at a seemingly increasing pace over the last decade. As the general population ages, treatment of degenerative lumbar disease will become a more prevalent-and costlier-issue for surgeons as well as the healthcare system overall. This review will cover the evolution of indications and techniques for fusion in degenerative lumbar disease, with emphasis on the evidence for current practices.

Augmented pedicle trajectory applied on the osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease: mid-term outcome

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficiency of cement-augmented pedicle screw with traditional pedicle screw technique applied on the patients in the osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative diseases.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients followed up at least 2 years were enrolled in our institute with retrospectively reviewed from January 2009 to June 2014, diagnosed as lumbar spondylolisthesis, or lumbar stenosis, with T score ≤- 2.5 SD of BMD, and received less than three-segment PLIF or TLIF. All patients were divided into 2 groups: 28 (2 males, 26 females) in polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw group (PSA) group, the other 28 (3 males, 25 females) in traditional pedicle screw group (TPS). Surgical data including the operation time, intra-operative blood loss, hospitalization day and surgical complications were recorded, as well as the radiological parameters measured from the postoperative X-rays and CT scans containing the rates of fusion, screw loosening, and cage subsidence incidence. In addition, the visual analog scores (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 34.32 months (ranging from 24 months to 51 months). Compared with PSA group, operation time and average hospital stay in the TPS group decreased significantly (P < 0.05). While no statistical difference for blood loss between 2 groups (P > 0.05). At 2 years postoperation, from CT-scans, 2/172 screws loosening and 1/56 segment non-union occurred in PSA group, with significantly lower incidence than those in TPS group (8/152 screws loosening and 6/50 segments non-union occurred, P < 0.05). Regarding the cage subsidence, 24 segments found height loss (5.30 ± 1.92 mm) in PSA group without difference compared with that of 19 segments (4.78 ± 1.37 mm) in TPS group (P > 0.05). Besides, the number and the location of cages and the leakage of the cement were found out little related with the subsidence in the PSA group (P > 0.05). After surgeries, VAS and ODI at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and last follow-up improved significantly in two groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI preoperatively and postoperatively between 2 groups (P > 0.05). In addition, eight patients with asymptomatic trajectory PMMA leakages were detected.

CONCLUSION

Cement-augmented pedicle screw technique is effective and safe in the osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative diseases, with better fusion rates and less screw loosening incidence. There is no difference in the fusion rate and loosening rate between the two groups in the single segment patients; however, there are better fusion rate and lower pedicle screw loosening rate of the PSA group in the double or multiple group patients.

Cortical bone trajectory screws used to save failed traditional trajectory screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine and vice versa: a human cadaveric biomechanical study

OBJECTIVE

Traditional trajectory (TT) screws are widely used in lumbar fixation. However, they may require revision surgery in some instances, especially in patients with osteoporotic spines. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws may potentially be used to rescue a failed TT screw and vice versa in nonosteoporotic spines. This study aimed to investigate whether a CBT screw can salvage a compromised TT screw in osteoporotic lumbar spines and vice versa.

METHODS

A total of 42 vertebrae from 17 cadaveric lumbar spines were obtained. Bone mineral density was measured, and a CBT screw was randomly inserted into one side of each vertebra. A TT screw was then inserted into the contralateral side. The biomechanical properties of the screws were tested to determine their insertional torque, pullout strength, and fatigue performance. After checking the screws for the failure of each specimen, the failed screw track was salvaged with a screw of the opposite trajectory. The specimen was then subjected to the same mechanical tests, and results were recorded. A repeat pullout test on TT and CBT screws was also performed.

RESULTS

When CBT screws were used to rescue failed TT screws, the original torque increased by 50%, an average of 81% of the pullout strength of the initial TT screws was retained, and the fatigue performance was equal to that of the original screws, which were considerably stronger than the loose TT screws-that is, the TT repeat screws/TT screws were 33% of the pullout strength of the initial TT screws. When the TT screws were used to salvage the compromised CBT screws, the TT screws retained 51% of the original torque and 54% of the original pullout strength, and these screws were still stronger than the loose CBT screws-that is, the loose CBT screws retained 12% pullout strength of the initial CBT screws. Fatigue performance and the ratio of the pullout strength considerably decreased between the CBT rescue screws and the original CBT screws but slightly changed between the TT rescue screws and the original TT screws.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT and TT screws can be applied in a revision technique to salvage each other in osteoporotic lumbar spines. Additionally, CBT and TT screws each retain adequate insertional torque, pullout strength, and fatigue performance when used for revision in osteoporotic lumbar spines.

Determination of optimal screw number based on correction angle for main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Reducing the number of screw insertions while maintaining good clinical outcomes can improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of scoliosis surgery. However, the optimal minimum number of pedicle screws remains unclear. This study searched for factors to estimate the fewest number of pedicle screws required between end vertebrae in relation to preoperative main thoracic curve flexibility.

METHODS

Sixty-nine subjects (4 male and 65 female, mean age: 14.8 ± 2.5 years) who underwent skip pedicle screw fixation for Lenke type 1-4 or 6 curves and were followed for at least 1 year were enrolled. Intervention technique was selected according to the size and flexibility of the preoperative main thoracic curve. Surgery-related variables included pedicle screw number, rod material and diameter, and extent of Ponte osteotomy. The effect on postoperative correction angle (i.e., the difference between the preoperative supine position maximum bending and postoperative standing Cobb angles of the main thoracic curve) according to surgical intervention technique was estimated using multiple linear mixed regression models with the preoperative supine position maximum bending correction angle (i.e., the difference between the standing preoperative and supine position maximum bending Cobb angles) as a random effect.

RESULTS

The preoperative maximum bending correction angle was 8-42° and had a moderate negative correlation with postoperative correction angle (r = -0.65, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed a 1.7° (95% CI 0.7-2.6; P < 0.01) correction gain per single-screw insertion and a 1.8° (95% CI 0.5-3.1; P < 0.01) gain per intervertebral level in Ponte osteotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of pedicle screws necessary to correct main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves can be estimated by calculating correction gains of 1.7° per pedicle screw and 1.8° per Ponte osteotomy intervertebral level. Based on these results, it may be possible to reduce invasiveness and cost for patients requiring a smaller degree of correction.

Risk factors for robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw malposition

The accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is unstable and remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for unsatisfactory Renaissance robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. This was a retrospective study of prospective data. From January 2017 to March 2018, 136 robot-assisted pedicle screw placements were performed in our department for spinal diseases, and a total of 874 screws were evaluated. All screws were assessed by the Gertzbein and Robbins classification. A and B were defined as satisfactory. C, D, and E were defined as unsatisfactory. Intraoperative registration failures due to nontechnical reasons or intraoperative adjustment were also defined as unsatisfactory. According to the evaluated results, the screws were divided into the satisfactory group (Group A) and the unsatisfactory group (Group B). The satisfactory rate was defined as satisfactory screws (the screws in Group A)/total screws, and the accurate rate was defined as accuracy screws (the screws in Group A)/the screws implanted by the robot (total screws - failed registration screws - screws adjusted during the operation). The age, sex, BMI, and BMD as well as the type of disease, the degree of vertebral rotation and the type of screw placement (percutaneous implantation or open implantation) were compared between the two groups, with the assessment of potential risk factors for unsatisfactory robot-assisted screw placement using logistic regression. A total of 874 screws were evaluated; there were 759 screws in Group A and 115 screws in Group B. The satisfactory rate was 86.8% (759/874), and the accuracy rate of the robot-placed screws was 94.4% (759/804). After logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors were identified as obesity (OR 5.357 [95% CI 2.897–9.906], p < 0.01), osteoporosis, vertebral rotation and the presence of congenital scoliosis (OR 9.835 [95% CI 4.279–22.604], p < 0.01), particularly for severe osteoporosis (T < −3.5) and severe vertebral rotation (III-IV). According to the results of this study, obesity, osteoporosis and congenital scoliosis are risk factors for unsatisfactory robot-assisted screw placement. Furthermore, for surgeons in the initial stage of using a robot, we suggest avoiding cases in which a single risk factor or multiple risk factors exist to ensure the safety of the operation and to help augment the confidence of the surgeons.

Robot-assisted Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation Supplementing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure: Accuracy and Safety Evaluation of This Novel Minimally Invasive Technique

Objectives

Percutaneous transfacet screw fixation (pTSF) is a minimally invasive posterior fixation technique supplementing oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for lumbar spinal disorders. Accurate screw insertion is difficult to achieve and technically demanding under 2‐D fluoroscopy. Recently developed robot‐assisted spinal surgery demonstrated a high level of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion and a low complication rate. No published study has reported this combination technique. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety properties of the combination of both minimally invasive techniques: robot‐assisted pTSF supplementing the OLIF procedure.

Methods

This was an experimental and prospective study. Selected consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disorders received robot‐assisted pTSF supplementing the OLIF procedure using the TianJi Robot system operated by one senior surgeon from March to October 2018. The accuracy of screw insertion and perioperative screw‐related complications were evaluated. Assessment of the accuracy of screw insertion included intraoperative robotic guidance accuracy and incidence of screw encroachments. Intraoperative robotic guidance accuracy referred to translational and angular deviations of screws, which were assessed by comparing the planned and actual screw trajectories guided by the robot on reconstructed images using TianJi Robot Planning Software. Screw encroachments were evaluated on postoperative CT images and classified by a grading system (A, excellent; B, good; C, poor). Screw‐related complications including intraoperative pin skidding, screw malposition and adjustment, together with postoperative neurological symptoms that correlated with screw malposition were recorded.

Results

Ten patients, with an average age of 60.2 years, were selected and recruited in this study. All cases were degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, out of which there were 6 cases of Meyerding Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Twenty‐four transfacet screws were inserted by robotic assistance. Instrumented levels included nine segments at L_4–5 level and three segments at L_3–4 level. Two patients had both L_4–5 and L_3–4 level fixation. The average surgical time was 3.3 h (SD, 0.8 h). The mean blood loss was 90 mL (SD, 32 mL). Intraoperative guidance accuracy showed 1.09 ± 0.17 mm (ranging from 0.75 to 1.22 mm) translational deviation and 2.17° ± 0.39° (ranging from 1.47° to 2.54°) angular deviation. The gradings of screw encroachment were: 17 screws (71%) with Grade A, 6 screws (25%) with Grade B, and 1 screw (4%) with Grade C. Only one pin skidding occurred intraoperatively and revised subsequently. No postoperative neurological complications were found.

Conclusion

Our preliminary study of robot‐assisted pTSF supplementing the OLIF procedure showed a high level of accuracy for screw insertion and this minimally invasive combination technique was found to be a feasible and safe procedure.

Robot-assisted Minimally-invasive Internal Fixation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Single-center Experience

Objective

To investigate the indications, surgical strategy and techniques, safety, and efficacy of robot‐assisted minimally‐invasive internal fixation of pelvic ring injuries.

Methods

The clinical data of 86 patients with anterior and posterior pelvic ring injuries who underwent robot‐assisted minimally‐invasive internal fixation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included 57 men and 29 women aged between 22 and 75 years, with an average age of (40.2 ± 13.6) years. According to the Tile classification, there were 5 (5.8%) type A2, 48 (55.8%) type B, and 33 (38.4%) type C fractures. The surgical plans were formulated based on the injury type of the pelvic ring, the effectiveness of the reduction, and the integrity of the osseous channel. Posterior pelvic ring injuries were treated with robot‐assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint. Anterior pelvic ring injuries were treated with robot‐assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of the pubic ramus, INFIX fixation, or a “hybrid” fixation. The surgical complications and the efficacy of the surgical treatments were analyzed.

Results

A total of 274 screws were inserted with robotic assistance, of which 262 screws were successfully inserted to a satisfactory position on the first attempt. The number of screws placed per person was 3.2 on average, and the average operation time was 175 min (35–280 min). Fluoroscopies were performed an average of 29.1 times (range, 9–63 times), and it took 6.1 s to place each screw. There were 13 unsatisfactory guiding needle placements during the surgeries, among 7 of which cutting or penetration of the cortex was re‐planned until satisfactory insertions; 1 penetrated the pubic cortex, causing hemorrhage of the “crown of death,” and was changed to “hybrid surgery”. The robot‐assisted surgical wounds all healed by primary intention with satisfactory position and precision of screw insertions. All patients were followed up for 3–6 months, with an average of 4.2 months. There were two postoperative fixation failures, in which both patients had separated symphysis pubes after hybrid surgery. The average Majeed score at the last follow‐up was 92.4 points.

Conclusions

Robot‐assisted surgery is accurate and minimally invasive, with a high success rate for one‐time screw placement and satisfactory clinical results. The indications and surgical strategy should be rigorously selected, the level of surgical techniques mastered, and the operating procedures standardized, all of which may help to prevent surgical complications. Robot‐assisted surgery provides a novel modality for the minimally‐invasive treatment of pelvic ring injuries.

Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgeons have increasingly adopted robotic-assisted lumbar spinal fusion due to indications that robotic-assisted surgery can reduce pedicle screw misplacement. However, the impact of robotic-assisted spinal fusion on patient outcomes is less clear.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare rates of perioperative complications between robotic-assisted and conventional lumbar spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 520 patients undergoing lumbar fusion were analyzed. The average ages of patients in the robotic-assisted versus conventional groups were 60.33 and 60.31, respectively (p=.987). Patients with a diagnosis of fracture, traumatic spinal cord injury, spina bifida, neoplasia, or infection were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

This study compared the rates perioperative major and minor complications for elective lumbar fusion between each cohort.

METHODS

This study screened hospital discharges in the United States from 2010 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes were used to identify 209,073 patients who underwent conventional lumbar fusion (ICD 81.04-8) and 279 patients who underwent robotic-assisted lumbar fusion (ICD 81.04-8 and ICD 17.41, 17.49). Major and minor complications were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. The robotic-assisted and conventional fusion groups were statistically matched on age, year, sex, indication, race, hospital type, and comorbidities. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare risks of major and minor complications.

RESULTS

We matched 257 (92.11%) robotic-assisted patients with an equal number of patients undergoing conventional lumbar fusion. Minor complications occurred in 16.73% of cases in the conventional group and 31.91% of cases in the robotic-assisted group (p<.001). Major complications occurred in 6.61% of the conventional cases compared to 8.17% of robotic-assisted cases (p=.533). For robotic-assisted fusion, multivariate analysis revealed that there was no difference in the likelihood of major complications (OR=0.834, 95% CI=0.214-3.251) or minor complications (OR = 1.450, 95% CI=0.653-3.220).

CONCLUSIONS

In a statistically matched cohort, patients who underwent robotic-assisted lumbar fusion had similar rates of major and minor complications compared to patients who underwent conventional lumbar fusion.

Biomechanical Comparison of the Load-Sharing Capacity of High and Low Implant Density Constructs With Three Types of Pedicle Screws for the Instrumentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical numerical simulation analysis of implant design and density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior instrumentation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the combined effect of pedicle screw design and density on deformity correction and construct load-sharing capacity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Screw density is an area of popular study because of the impact of cost and potential patient morbidity of higher-density constructs. Using fewer screws raises concern about reduced correction and greater forces on each screw.

METHODS

Personalized spinal numerical models were created for five patients. The correction techniques from five spine surgeons using both a high- and a low-density implant pattern (2 vs. 1.4 ± 0.22 screws/level) with uniaxial, multiaxial, and favored angle screws were simulated. The predicted correction and forces sustained by the implants were compared. The postoperative load-sharing capacity of a high- and a low-density construct, with or without crosslinks, was compared by simulating daily activities motions.

RESULTS

The major coronal curve correction was similar with high- and low-density constructs (73% ± 10% vs. 72% ± 10%; p > .05) but was higher when using uniaxial (77% ± 8%) compared to multiaxial (69% ± 11%) and favored angle screws (71% ± 10%; p = .009). High- and low-density constructs sustained similar intraoperative peak forces (305 ± 61 N vs. 301 ± 73 N; p = .23) regardless of screw design (all p > .05). Multiaxial and favored angle screws reduced the peak axial force by 23% and 38% compared to uniaxial screws (p = .007). The high-density construct reduced the postoperative loads sustained by each implant by 31% (p = .006). Crosslinks had no effect on load sharing (p = .23).

CONCLUSION

High- and low-density implant patterns achieved similar coronal correction with equivalent capacity to share corrective forces regardless of the screw design. Increased degrees of freedom of the screw head reduces the capacity to correct coronal deformity but generates lower bone-screw forces. The reduced number of screws increased the postoperative forces sustained by each screw, but its effect on potential complications requires further investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Significant variability in surgeons' preferred correction maneuvers and instrumentation strategies when planning adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

BACKGROUND

Increased implant number is thought to provide better control on the scoliotic spine, but there is limited scientific evidence of improved deformity correction and surgical outcomes with high-density constructs. The objective is to assess key anchor points used by experienced spinal deformity surgeons and to evaluate the effect of implant density pattern on correction techniques.

METHODS

Seventeen experienced spine surgeons reviewed five Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases and provided their preferred posterior correction technique (implant pattern, correction maneuvers, and implants used for their execution) and an alternative technique with the minimal implant density they felt would be acceptable (170 surgical plans total). Additionally, for each case, they selected acceptable screw patterns for surgery from seven published implant configurations. Variability in the surgeons' plans was assessed, including instrumentation and correction strategies.

RESULTS

The preferred correction plan involved an average of 1.65 implants/vertebra, with 88% of the available anchor points at the apex ± 1 vertebra used for the execution of correction maneuvers and only 43% of possible anchor points used proximal and distal to the apical area. The minimal density that surgeons found acceptable was 1.24 implants/vertebra. The minimal density plan involved more in situ rod contouring (53 vs. 41%), fewer vertebral derotation maneuvers (82 vs. 96%), and fewer implants used for compression/distraction maneuvers (1.18 and 1.42 respectively) (p < 0.05). Implant placement at alternate levels or dropout of convex implants above and below the apical area was most frequently considered acceptable (> 70% agreement).

CONCLUSIONS

Implant position and number affect surgeons correction maneuvers selection. For low implant density constructs, dropout in the convexity and particularly in the periapical region is accepted by surgeons, with minor influence on planned correction maneuvers. Thus, preoperative implant planning must take into account which anchor points are needed for desired correction maneuvers.

Biomechanical properties of novel transpedicular transdiscal screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique in lumbar spine: A finite element study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate finite element biomechanical properties of the novel transpedicular transdiscal (TPTD) screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique in lumbar spine.

Methods

An L4–L5 finite element model was established and validated. Then, two fixation models, TPTD screw system and bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS), were established on the validated L4–L5 finite element model. The inferior surface of the L5 vertebra was set immobilised, and moment of 7.5 Nm was applied on the L4 vertebra to test the range of motion (ROM) and stress at flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.

Results

The intact model was validated for prediction accuracy by comparing two previously published studies. Both of TPTD and BPSS fixation models displayed decreased motion at L4–L5. The ROMs of six moments of flexion, extension, left lateral bending, right lateral bending, left axial rotation and right axial rotation in TPTD model were 1.92, 2.12, 1.10, 1.11, 0.90 and 0.87°, respectively; in BPSS model, they were 1.48, 0.42, 0.35, 0.38, 0.74 and 0.75°, respectively. The screws' peak stress of above six moments in TPTD model was 182.58, 272.75, 133.01, 137.36, 155.48 and 150.50 MPa, respectively; and in BPSS model, it was 103.16, 129.74, 120.28, 134.62, 180.84 and 169.76 MPa, respectively.

Conclusion

Both BPSS and TPTD can provide stable biomechanical properties for lumbar spine. The decreased ROM of flexion, extension and lateral bending was slightly more in BPSS model than in TPTD model, but TPTD model had similar ROM of axial rotation with BPSS model. The screws' peak stress of TPTD screw focused on the L4–L5 intervertebral space region, and more caution should be put at this site for the fatigue breakage.

The translational potential of this article

Our finite element study provides the biomechanical properties of novel TPTD screw fixation, and promotes this novel transpedicular transdiscal screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique be used clinically.

Accuracy of powered surgical instruments compared with manual instruments for pedicle screw insertion: Evaluation using o-arm-based navigation in scoliosis surgery

BACKGROUND

Though powered surgical instruments for pedicle screw insertion combined with navigation have been developed to reduce time taken for spine surgery, clinical evidence demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of powered surgical instruments is limited. The goals of the present study were to compare the accuracy of powered instruments and manual instruments using O-arm-based navigation in surgery for scoliosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 60 consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior corrective surgery using O-arm based navigation, collected from Jun 2013 to Feb 2015. Overall, 393 screws were tapped and inserted in 30 patients using manual instruments (group M) and 547 screws were tapped and inserted in 30 patients using powered instruments (group P). Postoperative computed tomography was used to assess screw accuracy using the established Neo classification (Grade 0, no perforation; Grade 1, perforation <2 mm, Grade 2: perforation ≥2 and <4 mm, Grade 3: perforation ≥4 mm). The time to position one screw, including registration, was calculated.

RESULTS

In group M, 331 (84%) of the 393 pedicle screw placements were categorized as Grade 0, 49 (13%) were Grade 1, 13 (3.3%) were Grade 2, and 0 were Grade 3. In group P, 459 (84%) of the 547 pedicle screw placements were categorized as Grade 0, 75 (14%) were Grade 1, 13 (2.4%) were Grade 2, and 0 were Grade 3. We found no significant difference in the prevalence of Grade 2-3 perforations between groups. The time to insert one pedicle screw was 5.4 ± 1.4 min in group M, but significantly decreased to 3.4 ± 1.2 min in group P.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that powered instruments using O-arm navigation insert pedicle screws as accurately as conventional manual instruments using O-arm navigation. The use of powered instruments requires less time in O-arm surgery for scoliosis.

A study on the use of the Osstell apparatus to evaluate pedicle screw stability: An in-vitro study using micro-CT

Pull-out force and insertion torque have not been generally used as intraoperative measures for the evaluation of pedicle screw stability because of their invasiveness. On the other hand, resonance frequency analysis is a non-invasive and repeatable technique that has been clinically used in dentistry to evaluate implant stability e.g. by the Osstell apparatus. In this study, the characteristics of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value obtained by the Osstell apparatus in the field of spinal surgery were investigated. Biomechanical test materials simulating human bone were used to provide a comparative platform for evaluating each fixation strength measure, including pull-out force, insertion torque, and the ISQ value. To perform pull-out force measurement and to repeat pedicle screw insertion and removal, loosening was artificially created, and its effect was investigated. The grade of loosening was quantified on a micro-CT image after pedicle screw removal. In the comparison of the 3 fixation strength measures, the correlations of the ISQ value with the pull-out force (R² = 0.339 p <0.0001) and the insertion torque (R² = 0.337 p <0.0001) were lower than the correlation between pull-out force and insertion torque (R² = 0.918 p <0.0001). On a micro-CT study, the material volume of the internal threads disappeared after destruction of its integrity due to repeated pedicle screw insertion and removal. Material integrity destruction of the internal threads decreased only the pull-out force and the insertion torque, but it did not affect the ISQ value. The ISQ value only decreased when the material volume of the internal threads disappeared, probably because the ISQ value reflects the resistance against a force in the perpendicular direction of the screw, unlike the conventional measures of fixation strength, such as pull-out force and insertion torque, which reflect axial load.