Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-infective agents in critically ill patients

Initial adequate anti-infective therapy is associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with severe infections. However, in critically ill patients, several pathophysiological and/or iatrogenic factors may affect the pharmacokinetics of anti-infective agents leading to suboptimal drug exposure, in particular during the early phase of therapy. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may assist to overcome this problem. We discuss the available evidence on the use of TDM in critically ill patient populations for a number of anti-infective agents, including aminoglycosides, β-lactams, glycopeptides, antifungals and antivirals. Also, we present the available evidence on the practices of anti-infective TDM and describe the potential utility of TDM to improve treatment outcome in critically ill patients with severe infections. For aminoglycosides, glycopeptides and voriconazole, beneficial effects of TDM have been established on both drug effectiveness and potential side effects. However, for other drugs, therapeutic ranges need to be further defined to optimize treatment prescription in this setting.

Pharmacokinetics of oral vs. intravenous dexamethasone in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

AIM

The use of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy might be effective in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Oral administration of dexamethasone is a practical and safer alternative to the intravenous route. Since patients hospitalized with pneumonia might have delayed gastric emptying, this study explored systemic exposure in terms of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of oral dexamethasone in patients hospitalized with CAP.

METHODS

In this randomized, open label study, 30 patients admitted with CAP were randomized to receive either 4 mg intravenous or 6 mg oral dexamethasone for 4 consecutive days. Serial blood samples were obtained before and after drug administration.

RESULTS

Median AUC to infinity was 626 μg l(-1)  h (IQR 401-1161) for the intravenous group and 774 μg l(-1)  h (IQR 618-1146) for the oral group. The AUC ratio of 6 mg oral and 4 mg intravenous dexamethasone was 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81, 1.82), which represents a bioavailability of 81% (95% CI 54, 121) after correction for differences in dexamethasone dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioavailability of oral dexamethasone in patients hospitalized with pneumonia is sufficient. This makes oral dexamethasone an appropriate alternative for intravenous administration in these patients.

Addressing Concerns about Changing the Route of Antimicrobial Administration from Intravenous to Oral in Adult Inpatients

BACKGROUND

Many health care institutions are in the process of establishing antimicrobial stewardship programs. Changing the route of administration of antimicrobial agents from intravenous to oral (IV to PO) is a simple, well-recognized intervention that is often part of an antimicrobial stewardship program. However, the attending health care team may have concerns about making this switch.

OBJECTIVES

To provide insights into common concerns related to IV to PO conversion, with the aim of helping antimicrobial stewardship teams to address them.

DATA SOURCES

Published clinical trials and reviews were identified from a literature search of Ovid MEDLINE with the keywords (step down or switch or conversion or transition or sequential) and (antibiotics or antibacterial agents or antimicrobial or anti-infective agents).

DATA SYNTHESIS

The following issues are addressed in this review: benefits of the oral route, serum concentrations yielded by the oral formulation, source of pharmacokinetic data, clinical outcomes, provision of care in the intensive care unit, fear of therapeutic failure, and administration of antimicrobials via feeding tube.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering a change to oral therapy, it is important to have a thorough understanding of key aspects of the antimicrobial agent, the patient, and the disease being treated. The antimicrobial stewardship team has an important role in facilitating IV to PO conversion, educating prescribers, and addressing any concerns or reservations that may interfere with timely transition from IV to PO administration.

The shortened infusion time of intravenous ibuprofen part 1: a multicenter, open-label, surveillance trial to evaluate safety and efficacy

PURPOSE

The main purpose of the study was to determine the safety profile and efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen administered over 5 to 10 minutes for the treatment of pain or fever in hospitalized patients. Current evidence supports the use of intravenous infusions of ibuprofen to control pain and reduce the opioid requirements associated with surgical pain. Current dosing guidelines recommend that the drug be administered over 30 minutes. However, a more rapid infusion might yield additional benefits. The safety profile and efficacy of a shortened infusion time requires additional study.

METHODS

This was a Phase IV multicenter, open-label, surveillance clinical study. Thirteen clinical centers located in the United States enrolled a total of 150 adult hospitalized patients with pain or fever. Patients experiencing pain received 800 mg intravenous ibuprofen infused over 5 to 10 minutes every 6 hours for up to 24 hours (4 doses) and patients experiencing fever received 400 mg intravenous ibuprofen infused over 5 to 10 minutes every 4 hours for up to 24 hours (6 doses). Vital signs, adverse events, and pain scores were assessed. The exclusion criteria included inadequate intravenous access; patients younger than 18 years of age; history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of intravenous ibuprofen, aspirin, or other nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs; active hemorrhage or clinically significant bleeding; pregnancy or nursing; and patients in the perioperative period in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

FINDINGS

Adverse events were reported for 43 of 150 patients (29%). The most common adverse events experienced by patients were infusion site pain in 22 of 150 patients (15%) and flatulence (8 of 150 [5%]). Four patients (3%) discontinued the study drug due to infusion-site pain. In the patients experiencing fever, temperature decreased from baseline over 4 hours (mean [SD] reduction of 1.5 [1.25]°F). In patients experiencing pain, patient-reported visual analog scale scores decreased from baseline over 4 hours (mean [SD] reduction of 27.1 [31.29] mm).

IMPLICATIONS

The study demonstrates that more rapid administration of intravenous ibuprofen is well tolerated and supports intravenous ibuprofen as an effective treatment for pain and fever in hospitalized patients.

Using skin for drug delivery and diagnosis in the critically ill

Skin offers easy access, convenience and non-invasiveness for drug delivery and diagnosis. In principle, these advantages of skin appear to be attractive for critically ill patients given potential difficulties that may be associated with oral and parenteral access in these patients. However, the profound changes in skin physiology that can be seen in these patients provide a challenge to reliably deliver drugs or provide diagnostic information. Drug delivery through skin may be used to manage burn injury, wounds, infection, trauma and the multisystem complications that rise from these conditions. Local anaesthetics and analgesics can be delivered through skin and may have wide application in critically ill patients. To ensure accurate information, diagnostic tools require validation in the critically ill patient population as information from other patient populations may not be applicable.

Insufficient fluconazole exposure in pediatric cancer patients and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Fluconazole is recommended as first-line treatment in invasive candidiasis in children and infants. Although timely achievement of adequate exposure of fluconazole improves outcome, therapeutic drug monitoring is currently not recommended.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of critically ill children treated with fluconazole from January 2007 to October 2013 and for whom fluconazole concentrations were available. We collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data through review of the medical records and determined the correlation of clinical variables with the fluconazole concentration. Additionally, we assessed the relation between the fluconazole concentration and the time to culture conversion in patients with proven invasive candidiasis.

RESULTS

In total, 99 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. The fluconazole concentration was considered subtherapeutic in 40% of the patients. Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant, independent, and positive association of the fluconazole trough concentration with the fluconazole dose (P <.001), weight (P = .009), and the serum urea concentration (P = .003), and a significant, independent, and negative association with age (P = .004) and cancer as an underlying condition (P = .003). A higher fluconazole concentration was associated with a shorter time to culture conversion (hazard ratio = 1.076 [95% confidence interval, 1.017-1.138]; P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

The fluconazole concentration is not sufficient in pediatric cancer patients with the currently recommended dose regimen, and a higher fluconazole dose is required to achieve adequate drug exposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring of fluconazole can be a valuable tool to detect possible underexposure in critically ill children.

Intravenous ibuprofen for postoperative pain

SUMMARY A multimodal analgesic approach involving intravenous NSAIDs in the perioperative setting has been common practice for many years outside of the USA. As an adjunct to the central analgesic effects of opioids, intravenous NSAIDs may be important for perioperative pain management due to their analgesic and peripheral anti-inflammatory effects. Together, these agents may attenuate the pain resulting from the surgical procedure better than either agent used singly. Prior to 2009, ketorolac was the only intravenous NSAID approved in the USA for the treatment of pain. However, in June 2009, intravenous ibuprofen (Caldolor(®)) was approved by the US FDA for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pain as a single agent and moderate-to-severe pain as an adjunct to opioids. A growing body of research has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of intravenous ibuprofen in the perioperative setting and is reviewed herein.

Xenobiotic metabolism: the effect of acute kidney injury on non-renal drug clearance and hepatic drug metabolism

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of critical illness, and evidence is emerging that suggests AKI disrupts the function of other organs. It is a recognized phenomenon that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have reduced hepatic metabolism of drugs, via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme group, and drug dosing guidelines in AKI are often extrapolated from data obtained from patients with CKD. This approach, however, is flawed because several confounding factors exist in AKI. The data from animal studies investigating the effects of AKI on CYP activity are conflicting, although the results of the majority do suggest that AKI impairs hepatic CYP activity. More recently, human study data have also demonstrated decreased CYP activity associated with AKI, in particular the CYP3A subtypes. Furthermore, preliminary data suggest that patients expressing the functional allele variant CYP3A5*1 may be protected from the deleterious effects of AKI when compared with patients homozygous for the variant CYP3A5*3, which codes for a non-functional protein. In conclusion, there is a need to individualize drug prescribing, particularly for the more sick and vulnerable patients, but this needs to be explored in greater depth.

Relevance of Liver Failure for Anti-Infective Agents: From Pharmacokinetic Alterations to Dosage Adjustments

The liver is a complex organ with great ability to influence drug pharmacokinetics. Due to its wide array of function, its impairment has the potential to affect bioavailability, enterohepatic circulation, drug distribution, metabolism, clearance, and biliary elimination. These alterations differ widely depending on the cause of the liver failure, if it is acute or chronic in nature, the extent of impairment, and comorbid conditions. In addition, effects on liver functions do not occur in a proportional or predictable manner for escalating degrees of liver impairment. The ability of hepatic alterations to influence PK is also dependent on drug characteristics, such as administration route, chemical properties, protein binding, and extraction ratio, among others. This complexity makes it difficult to predict what these effects have on drugs. Unlike certain classes of agents, efficacy of anti-infectives is most often dependent on fulfilling pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, such as C_max/MIC, AUC/MIC, T_>MIC, IC₅₀/EC₅₀, or T>EC₉₅. Loss of efficacy, or conversely, increased risk of toxicity may occur in certain circumstances of liver injury. Although important to consider these potential alterations and their effects on specific anti-infectives, many lack data to constitute specific dosing adjustments, making it important to monitor patients for effectiveness and toxicities of therapy.

Interpatient variability in dexmedetomidine response: a survey of the literature

Fifty-five thousand patients are cared for in the intensive care unit (ICU) daily with sedation utilized to reduce anxiety and agitation while optimizing comfort. The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) released updated guidelines for management of pain, agitation, and delirium in the ICU and recommended nonbenzodiazepines, such as dexmedetomidine and propofol, as first line sedation agents. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, offers many benefits yet its use is mired by the inability to consistently achieve sedation goals. Three hypotheses including patient traits/characteristics, pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, and clinically relevant genetic polymorphisms that could affect dexmedetomidine response are presented. Studies in patient traits have yielded conflicting results regarding the role of race yet suggest that dexmedetomidine may produce more consistent results in less critically ill patients and with home antidepressant use. Pharmacokinetics of critically ill patients are reported as similar to healthy individuals yet wide, unexplained interpatient variability in dexmedetomidine serum levels exist. Genetic polymorphisms in both metabolism and receptor response have been evaluated in few studies, and the results remain inconclusive. To fully understand the role of dexmedetomidine, it is vital to further evaluate what prompts such marked interpatient variability in critically ill patients.

Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion considerations in critically ill adults

INTRODUCTION

All critically ill patients require medication to treat organ dysfunction. However, the pharmacokinetics of drugs used to treat these patients is complex due to frequent alterations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME).

AREAS COVERED

This review examines pharmacokinetic aspects of drug administration for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Specifically, the authors examine the ADME changes that occur and which should be considered by clinicians when delivering drug therapy to critically ill patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosage pharmacokinetics determined from single-dose or limited-duration administration studies in healthy volunteers may not apply to critically ill patients. Organ dysfunction among these patients may be due to pre-existing disease or the effects of a systemic or locoregional inflammatory response precipitated by their illness. Alterations in pharmacokinetics observed among the critically ill include altered bioavailability after enteral administration, increased volume of distribution and blood-brain barrier permeability and changes in P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 enzyme function. However, the effect of these changes on clinically important outcomes remains uncertain and poorly studied. Future investigations should examine not only pharmacokinetic changes among the critically ill, but also whether recognition of these changes and alterations in drug therapy directed as a consequence of their observation alters patient outcomes.

Oseltamivir pharmacokinetics in critically ill adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is known to affect pharmacokinetics and hence optimum dosing. The aim of this open label, prospective study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir (prodrug) and oseltamivir carboxylate (active metabolite) during ECMO. Fourteen adult patients with suspected or confirmed H1N1 influenza were enrolled in the study. Oseltamivir 75 mg was enterally administered twice daily and blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were taken on day 1 and 5. A multi-compartmental model to describe the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate was developed using a non-linear mixed effects modelling approach. The median (range) clearance of oseltamivir carboxylate was 15.8 (4.8-36.6) l/hour, lower than the reported mean value of 21.5 l/hour in healthy adults. The median (range) steady state volume of distribution of oseltamivir carboxylate was 179 (61-436) litres, much greater than healthy adults but similar to previous reports in critically ill patients. Substantial 'between subject' variability in systemic exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate was revealed; median (range) area under the curve and Cmax were 4346 (644-13660) ng/hour/ml and 509 (54-1277) ng/ml, respectively. Both area under the curve and Cmax were significantly correlated with serum creatinine (r2=0.37, P=0.02 and r2=0.29, P=0.02, respectively). Systemic exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate following the administration of enteral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily in adult ECMO patients is comparable to those in ambulatory patients and far in excess of concentrations required to maximally inhibit neuraminidase activity of the H1N1 virus. Dosage adjustment for ECMO, per se, appears not to be necessary; however, doses should be reduced in patients with renal dysfunction.

Sedation for critically ill or injured adults in the intensive care unit: a shifting paradigm

As most critically ill or injured patients will require some degree of sedation, the goal of this paper was to comprehensively review the literature associated with use of sedative agents in the intensive care unit (ICU). The first and selected latter portions of this article present a narrative overview of the shifting paradigm in ICU sedation practices, indications for uninterrupted or prolonged ICU sedation, and the pharmacology of sedative agents. In the second portion, we conducted a structured, although not entirely systematic, review of the available evidence associated with use of alternative sedative agents in critically ill or injured adults. Data sources for this review were derived by searching OVID MEDLINE and PubMed from their first available date until May 2012 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses and economic evaluations. Advances in the technology of mechanical ventilation have permitted clinicians to limit the use of sedation among the critically ill through daily sedative interruptions or other means. These practices have been reported to result in improved mortality, a decreased length of ICU and hospital stay and a lower risk of drug-associated delirium. However, in some cases, prolonged or uninterrupted sedation may still be indicated, such as when patients develop intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury. The pharmacokinetics of sedative agents have clinical importance and may be altered by critical illness or injury, co-morbid conditions and/or drug-drug interactions. Although use of validated sedation scales to monitor depth of sedation is likely to reduce adverse events, they have no utility for patients receiving neuromuscular receptor blocking agents. Depth of sedation monitoring devices such as the Bispectral Index (BIS©) also have limitations. Among existing RCTs, no sedative agent has been reported to improve the risk of mortality among the critically ill or injured. Moreover, although propofol may be associated with a shorter time to tracheal extubation and recovery from sedation than midazolam, the risk of hypertriglyceridaemia and hypotension is higher with propofol. Despite dexmedetomidine being linked with a lower risk of drug-associated delirium than alternative sedative agents, this drug increases risk of bradycardia and hypotension. Among adults with severe traumatic brain injury, there are insufficient data to suggest that any single sedative agent decreases the risk of subsequent poor neurological outcomes or mortality. The lack of examination of confounders, including the type of healthcare system in which the investigation was conducted, is a major limitation of existing pharmacoeconomic analyses, which likely limits generalizability of their results.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in critically ill patients with severe sepsis

AIM

To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cisatracurium in critically ill patients with severe sepsis.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected before and over 8 h after a single bolus dose of cisatracurium 0.1 mg kg(-1) . Neuromuscular block was assessed by accelerometric peripheral nerve stimulation (TOF Watch). Plasma concentration and neuromuscular block data were fitted using population analysis.

RESULTS

Steady-state volume of distribution was determined to be 111 ± 71 ml kg(-1) and plasma clearance was 5.2 ± 1.8 ml min(-1) kg(-1) in these patients with greater inter-patient variability compared with other populations. The time to maximum block (8.3 ± 2.9 min) and delay time of transferring from central to effect compartment (17.2 min) was much longer, while the maximum block (95.0 ± 6.3%) was less compared with those in other patient populations. The effect compartment concentration resulting in 50% of maximum effect (128 ± 58 ng ml(-1)) was larger than previously described.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that standard dosing of cisatracurium in patients with severe sepsis results in a slower patient response with a reduced effect. Use of a larger dose may overcome this reduced delayed response.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous oseltamivir: single- and multiple-dose phase I studies with healthy volunteers

There is an unmet need for an intravenous (i.v.) neuraminidase inhibitor, particularly for patients with severe influenza who cannot take oral medication. Two phase I pharmacokinetic and safety studies of i.v. oseltamivir were carried out in healthy volunteers. The first was an open-label, randomized, four-period, two-sequence, single-dose trial of 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg oseltamivir i.v. over 2 h and a 75-mg oral dose of oseltamivir. The second was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multiple-dose study in which participants were randomized to 100 mg or 200 mg oseltamivir or placebo (normal saline) i.v. over 2 h every 12 h for 5 days. Exposure to the active metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) after dosing achieved with 100 mg oseltamivir administered i.v. over 2 h was comparable to that achieved with 75 mg administered orally. Single i.v. doses of oseltamivir up to 400 mg were well tolerated with no new safety signals. Multiple-dose data confirmed good tolerability of 100 mg and 200 mg oseltamivir and showed efficacious OC exposures with 100 mg i.v. over 2 h twice daily for 5 days. These results support further exploration of i.v. oseltamivir as an influenza treatment option for patients unable to take oral medication.

Pharmacokinetic changes in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass used to temporarily sustain cardiac and/or respiratory function in critically ill patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation further complicates the management of critically ill patients who already have profound physiologic derangements with consequent altered pharmacokinetics. The purpose of this study is to identify and critically review the published literature describing pharmacokinetics in the presence of ECMO. This review revealed a dearth of data describing pharmacokinetics during ECMO in critically ill adults, with most of the available data originating in neonates. Of concern, the present data indicate substantial variability and a lack of predictability in drug behavior in the presence of ECMO. The most common mechanisms by which ECMO affects pharmacokinetics are sequestration in the circuit, increased volume of distribution, and decreased drug elimination. While lipophilic drugs and highly protein-bound drugs (eg, voriconazole and fentanyl) are significantly sequestered in the circuit, hydrophilic drugs (eg, β-lactam antibiotics, glycopeptides) are significantly affected by hemodilution and other pathophysiologic changes that occur during ECMO. Although the published literature is insufficient to make any meaningful recommendations for adjusting therapy for drug dosing, this review systematically describes the available data enabling clinicians to make conclusions based on available data. Furthermore, this review serves to highlight the need for well-designed and conducted clinical and laboratory-based studies to provide the data from which robust dosing guidance can be developed to improve clinical outcomes in this most unwell cohort of patients.

Pharmacology of commonly used analgesics and sedatives in the ICU: benzodiazepines, propofol, and opioids

The ideal sedative or analgesic agent should have a rapid onset of activity, a rapid recovery after drug discontinuation, a predictable dose response, a lack of drug accumulation,and no toxicity. Unfortunately, none of the earlier analgesics, the benzodiazepines,or propofol share all of these characteristics. Patients who are critically ill experience numerous physiologic derangements and commonly require high doses and long durations of analgesic and sedative therapy. There is a paucity of well designed clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of earlier sedative and analgesic agents in the ICU. In addition, the ever-changing dynamics of patients who are critically ill makes the use of sedation a continual challenge during the course of each patient’s admission. To optimize care, clinicians should be familiar with the many pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic variables that can affect the safety and efficacy of sedatives and analgesics.

Tolerability and outcomes of kinetically guided therapy with gentamicin in critically ill neonates during the first week of life: an open-label, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Aminoglycosides are bactericidal antibiotics used worldwide for the treatment of serious infections in critically ill patients, including neonates. Critically ill neonates constitute a unique challenge in dosing owing to the pathologic alterations that accompany severe illness and the rapidly changing conditions of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to analyze the kinetically guided dosage adjustment of gentamicin in neonates critically ill during the first week of life based on plasma concentrations after the first dose and to identify the impact of covariates (eg, fluid intake, body fluid retention) with respect to gestational age (GA). Tolerability of therapy was also assessed.

METHODS

This 10-day, open-label, prospective study included neonates critically ill during the first week of life admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a children's hospital between January 2006 and July 2009. Hearing and renal assessments were conducted over a 24-month follow-up period. The patients were treated with gentamicin for suspected sepsis, proven sepsis, or pneumonia as an early sign of sepsis. The first and second doses of gentamicin 4 mg/kg were adjusted according to birth weight and GA: group 1 (GA < 34 weeks), 48-hour interdose intervals; group 2 (GA 34-38 weeks), 36 hours; and group 3 (GA > 38 weeks), 24 or 48 hours. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated after the first dose (given in 30-minute intravenous infusions) using 4 concentrations. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting the parameters of a 2-compartment model into 4 concentrations. The last 2 blood samples were taken 30 minutes before the fourth infusion (C(trough,3)) and 1 hour after its start (C(max,4)). Dosing was individualized to reach target ranges for the C(trough,3) (0.5-2.0 mg/L) and C(max,4) (6-10 mg/L) values. If needed, initial dosing was changed after the second dose by adjusting (reducing or increasing) the third and subsequent doses, or by adjusting (prolonging or shortening) the interdose intervals. C(trough,3) and C(max,4) were assessed to determine differences between predicted and assayed values. Fluid retention was registered as the difference between fluid intake and urine output at different intervals related to the first dose per kilogram of birth weight, and from the start of the first infusion (0 hour) to the day of the fourth infusion. The C(max)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio was determined for assessment of optimal response. Tolerability was evaluated during the 24-month follow-up period using renal sonography to screen for nephrocalcinosis and transient evoked otoacoustic emission recordings to evaluate hearing abnormalities.

RESULTS

A total of 84 neonates (all white; 53 males, 31 females; birth weight range, 0.8-4.56 kg; GA range, 24-42 weeks) were enrolled in 3 groups: group 1, GA < 34 weeks, n = 27; group 2, GA 34-38 weeks, n = 22; and group 3, GA > 38 weeks, n = 35. The C(max) value detected 1 hour after the start of the first infusion (C(max,1)) reached the target range of 6-10 mg/L in 66 of the 84 neonates (79%). After the initial dose, C(max,1) was variable (%CV, 29%); the failure rate to reach 6 mg/L was 13%. V(d) decreased with GA (r = -0.30, P < 0.01) and achieved mean (SD) rates of 0.51 (0.10), 0.48 (0.13), and 0.40 (0.15) L/kg in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Neither C(max) nor V(d) was correlated with fluid intake relative to the first infusion. Mean gentamicin clearance measured after dose 1 (0.47 [0.23], 0.66 [0.26], and 0.76 [0.32] mL/min/kg) increased with GA (r = 0.45, P < 0.001). The interdose interval was prolonged after the second and subsequent infusions in 8 of 84 neonates (10%) or by decreasing the third dose and subsequent doses in 51 neonates (61%). The target C(max,4) and C(trough,3) values occurred in 63% (22 of 35) and 83% (29 of 35) of full-term patients (GA >38 weeks), respectively. In preterm neonates, the target range for C(max,4) was reached in 11 of 27 patients (41%) in group 1 and 11 of 22 patients (50%) in group 2; for C(trough,3), the target range was reached in 25 patients (93%) in group 1 and in 16 (73%) in group 2. C(trough,3) >2 mg/L was detected in 1 full-term neonate, and gentamicin was withdrawn. Suspected fluid retention within the time period of 0 hour to the day of the fourth infusion was well correlated with actual body weight (r = 0.58, P < 0.001), but it was negatively correlated with C(max,4) (r = -0.25, P = 0.02). Thirteen of the 84 neonates (15%) had confirmed sepsis. C(max)/MIC was >12 except for 2 resistant staphylococcal infections (C(max)/MIC = 0.4); amikacin and vancomycin were substituted for gentamicin in these cases. Clinical signs and laboratory data indicative of suspected sepsis disappeared in 5 to 10 days in 68 of 71 neonates. In 1 neonate, gentamicin was withdrawn after dose 4 because of a high C(trough,3) value. In the 3 remaining neonates, C-reactive protein was decreased >10 days without changing therapy. Two neonates died, 1 of severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy as a consequence of perinatal asphyxia and another of stage IV intraventricular hemorrhage. Transient renal dysfunction attributable to gentamicin was detected in 1 case. No signs of late toxicity (nephrocalcinosis) were found during the second year of follow-up. Two neonates were diagnosed with unilateral hearing loss, a secondary phenomenon of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy thought to be related to the severe perinatal asphyxia.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial dose of gentamicin 4 mg/kg for these critically ill premature and mature neonates with sepsis during the first week of life was high enough to reach bactericidal C(max,1) within 6-10 mg/L. C(max,1) <6 mg/L occurred in 13% of neonates. The interdose interval modified according to the recommendation resulted in C(trough) values within the target range of 0.5-2.0 mg/L in all but 2 neonates. The kinetically guided maintenance dosing of gentamicin based on plasma concentrations after the first dose should be optimized, taking into account actual body weight. (EudraCT number: 2005-002723-13).

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous levofloxacin administered at 750 milligrams in obese adults

The physiochemical properties of levofloxacin suggest that it is an agent which may exhibit altered pharmacokinetics in obese individuals. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of a single 750-mg intravenous dose of levofloxacin in both hospitalized and ambulatory obese individuals. The hypothesis was that a standard dose of levofloxacin in obese individuals would achieve serum concentrations likely to be therapeutic. A single levofloxacin dose of 750 mg was infused over 90 min, and seven serial serum samples were subsequently obtained to evaluate the pharmacokinetics after the first dose. The peak concentrations of levofloxacin were comparable to those seen with normal-weight individuals. However, the area under the concentration-time curve and clearance were quite variable. Accelerated clearance was evident in the ambulatory obese individuals. Further investigation of the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin is necessary to ensure optimal dosing.

Impact of early oseltamivir treatment on outcome in critically ill patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A

OBJECTIVES

The impact of oseltamivir on mortality in critically ill patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (2009 H1N1) is not clear. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the timing of antiviral administration and intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study of a cohort of ICU patients with confirmed 2009 H1N1 infection. Clinical data, treatment and outcome were compared between patients receiving early treatment (ET) with oseltamivir, initiated within 2 days, and patients administered late treatment (LT), initiated after this timepoint. Multivariate analysis and propensity score were used to determine the effect of oseltamivir on ICU mortality.

RESULTS

Six hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Four hundred and four (61.5%) patients required mechanical ventilation (MV; mortality 32.6%). Among them, 385 received effective antiviral therapy and were included in the study group. All patients received oseltamivir for a median duration of 10 days (interquartile range 8-14 days). Seventy-nine (20.5%) ET patients were compared with 306 LT patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of main clinical variables. ICU length of stay (22.7 ± 16.7 versus 18.4 ± 14.2 days; P = 0.03), hospital length of stay (34.0 ± 20.3 versus 27.2 ± 18.2 days; P = 0.001) and MV days (17.4 ± 15.2 versus 14.0 ± 12.4; P = 0.04) were higher in the LT group. ICU mortality was also higher in LT (34.3%) than in ET (21.5%; OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.06-3.41). A multivariate model identified ET (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.87) as an independent variable associated with reduced ICU mortality. These results were confirmed by propensity score analysis (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.22-0.90; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that early oseltamivir administration was associated with favourable outcomes among critically ill ventilated patients with 2009 H1N1 virus infection.

Drug dosing considerations for the critically ill patient with liver disease

Hepatic dysfunction in the critically ill patient presents a unique challenge to clinicians when designing pharmacotherapeutic treatment plans. Overall, the literature regarding drug dosing in critically ill patients with hepatic dysfunction is incomplete and current tools available to bedside clinicians have limitations. Despite these challenges, rational drug regimens can be implemented by critical care nurses who consider the potential impact of hepatic dysfunction on drug pharmacokinetics. This information can be applied clinically and careful monitoring plans can be implemented to assess a drug for efficacy and safety. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic changes that can occur in hepatic failure, identifies practical ways to quantify the severity of dysfunction, and discusses general drug dosing strategies in this patient population.

Management of aminoglycosides in the intensive care unit

Antibacterial resistance is increasing throughout the world, while the development of new agents is slowly progressing. In addition, the increasing prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance may force many practitioners to choose an aminoglycoside agent in gram-negative regimens. Aminoglycosides are bactericidal agents with potent activity against gram-negative infections and activity against gram-positive infections when added to a cell wall active antimicrobial-based regimen. These agents may be dosed multiple times a day or consolidated as high-dose, extended-interval dosing to maximize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties to achieve possible improved efficacy with reduced toxicity. Clinical application includes the treatment of bacteremia, endocarditis, health-care and nosocomial pneumonias, intra-abdominal infections, and others. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are potential risks of aminoglycoside therapy that may be minimized with serum monitoring and short courses of therapy.

Enteric absorption and pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in critically ill patients with pandemic (H1N1) influenza

BACKGROUND

Whether the enteric absorption of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir is impaired in critically ill patients is unknown. We documented the pharmacokinetic profile of oseltamivir in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) influenza.

METHODS

We included 41 patients 18 years of age and older with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) influenza who were admitted for ventilatory support to nine ICUs in three cities in Canada and Spain. Using tandem mass spectrometry, we assessed plasma levels of oseltamivir free base and its active metabolite carboxylate at baseline (before gastric administration of the drug) and at 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12 hours after the fourth or later dose.

RESULTS

Among the 36 patients who did not require dialysis, the median concentration of oseltamivir free base was 10.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.8-14.9) microg/L; the median concentration of the carboxylate metabolite was 404 (IQR 257-900) microg/L. The volume of distribution of the carboxylate metabolite did not increase with increasing body weight (R2=0.00, p=0.87). The rate of elimination of oseltamivir carboxylate was modestly correlated with estimations of creatinine clearance (R2=0.27, p<0.001). Drug clearance in the five patients who required continuous renal replacement therapy was about one-sixth that in the 36 patients with relatively normal renal function.

INTERPRETATION

Oseltamivir was well absorbed enterically in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) influenza. The dosage of 75 mg twice daily achieved plasma levels that were comparable to those in ambulatory patients and were far in excess of concentrations required to maximally inhibit neuraminidase activity of the virus. Adjustment of the dosage in patients with renal dysfunction requiring continuous renal replacement therapy is appropriate; adjustment for obesity does not appear to be necessary.

Possible removal of topiramate by continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is primarily renally eliminated and requires dosage adjustment based upon renal function. While there is data to suggest drug removal during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), little is known regarding its clearance and dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe a 59-year-old man with refractory status epilepticus who was started on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for acute renal failure while receiving topiramate with a series of serum concentrations to assess for removal during CVVHDF.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest clinically important amounts of topiramate are removed by CRRT, and higher topiramate dosage may be needed for these patients instead of the current recommended 50% of normal dosage. Unfortunately, there is no antiepileptic drug dosing recommendation when used during CRRT due to the paucity of data. This case highlights a need for research evaluating the effect of CRRT on AED elimination in order to optimize therapy for seizure control.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin in critically ill patients

Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin is necessary to ensure therapeutic and nontoxic levels. Hypoalbuminemia, renal failure, and interactions with other highly protein-bound drugs (e.g., valproic acid) alter protein binding of phenytoin. When these conditions are present, free serum concentrations, which represent the pharmacologically active entity, cannot be predicted from total serum concentrations. Besides general alterations in drug distribution and elimination, protein binding is often altered in critically ill patients. Case reports describe phenytoin toxicity secondary to inappropriate dosage adjustments based solely on total serum concentrations in patients with hypoalbuminemia. Free drug measurements and theoretical equations to facilitate the interpretation of total phenytoin serum levels have been introduced. However, they are not widely implemented in clinical practice because evidence of improvements in patient outcomes is limited. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of phenytoin is indispensable for correct interpretation of total serum concentrations when protein binding is altered. Free serum concentrations should be measured, or theoretically calculated if measurements are unavailable, to avoid misinterpretation of total serum levels and consequent inappropriate adjustments in the dosage of phenytoin in critically ill patients.

Update on the management of infection in patients with severe sepsis

Morbidity and mortality associated with the development of severe sepsis remain unacceptably high. However, with the introduction of a protocol called early goal-directed therapy, significant benefits in terms of patient's outcome have been demonstrated. In an aim to improve outcome and to increase awareness, practical evidence-based guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock were developed under the auspices of the Sepsis Surviving Campaign, easy to apply by the bedside medical and nursing staff. The treatment of severe sepsis includes 3 main essentials: (1) eradication of the inciting infection using source control measures and empiric antimicrobials, (2) hemodynamic resuscitation of tissue hypoperfusion using fluids and inotropic drugs to prevent life-threatening organ damage, and (3) sustained organ support using mechanical interventions to diminish organ injury. This review article highlights the anti-infective approach of the management of sepsis.

[Recommendations for antibiotic monitoring in ICU patients]

Monitoring plasma concentrations of antimicrobial agents used to treat infection in critically ill patients is one of the recommended strategies for improving clinical outcome. Drug monitoring has a double aim: to limit adverse events and to increase the effectiveness of the drugs. In clinical practice, however, this approach is mainly limited to monitoring plasma concentrations of vancomycin and aminoglycosides, although future extension to other antimicrobial agents would be desirable. Application of this technique varies considerably between hospitals, and this makes interpretation and comparison of the results obtained difficult. For this reason, representatives of various scientific societies related to the pharmacokinetic area have developed a series of recommendations for monitoring plasma concentrations of antimicrobials using vancomycin and several aminoglycosides as the reference. The recommendations are based on 14 questions encompassing all steps of the process: indication for the test, blood sampling (timing of blood collection, blood volume, tubes), transport to the laboratory, techniques applied, normal values, dose adjustment, and reporting the results. The purpose of these guidelines is to develop a process of monitoring plasma antimicrobial concentrations that is as homogeneous as possible to facilitate the design of multicenter studies, as well as the interpretation and comparison of results.

[Recommendations for antibiotic monitoring in ICU patients]

Monitoring plasma concentrations of antimicrobial agents used to treat infection in critically ill patients is one of the recommended strategies for improving clinical outcome. Drug monitoring has a double

AIM

to limit adverse events and to increase the effectiveness of the drugs. In clinical practice, however, this approach is mainly limited to monitoring plasma concentrations of vancomycin and aminoglycosides, although future extension to other antimicrobial agents would be desirable. Application of this technique varies considerably between hospitals, and this makes interpretation and comparison of the results obtained difficult. For this reason, representatives of various scientific societies related to the pharmacokinetic area have developed a series of recommendations for monitoring plasma concentrations of antimicrobials using vancomycin and several aminoglycosides as the reference. The recommendations are based on 14 questions encompassing all steps of the process: indication for the test, blood sampling (timing of blood collection, blood volume, tubes), transport to the laboratory, techniques applied, normal values, dose adjustment, and reporting the

RESULTS

The purpose of these guidelines is to develop a process of monitoring plasma antimicrobial concentrations that is as homogeneous as possible to facilitate the design of multicenter studies, as well as the interpretation and comparison of results.

Glomerular Hyperfiltration and Albuminuria in Critically ILL Patients

Glomerular hyperfiltration and albuminuria are two pathological conditions that could alter renal drug elimination, but they have been rarely studied in a critical care setting.

The aims of this descriptive, prospective study performed on 89 critically ill patients are to determine rates of glomerular hyperfiltration (main objective) and albuminuria (secondary objective).

On admission, 17.9% of patients presented with glomerular hyperfiltration, climbing to rates as high as 30% during the first week of admission. Seventy-five percent showed albuminuria on admission, with rates remaining high throughout the week of the study.

Since glomerular hyperfiltration as well as albuminuria are frequent pathophysiological conditions in critical care patients, the implications that these phenomena may have regarding drug elimination need further evaluation.

Altered pharmacology in the Intensive Care Unit patient

Critically ill patients, not infrequently present alterations of physiological parameters that determine the success/failure of therapeutic interventions as well as the final outcome. Sepsis and polytrauma are two of the most common and complex syndromes occurring in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and affect drug absorption, disposition, metabolism and elimination. Pharmacological management of ICU patients requires consideration of the unique pharmacokinetics associated with these clinical conditions and the likely occurrence of drug interaction. Rational adjustment in drug choice and dosing contributes to the appropriateness of treatment of those patients.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in the Intensive Care Unit: setting appropriate dosing regimens

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at very high risk of developing severe nosocomial infections. Consequently, antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of these patients. Critically ill patients in ICUs include representatives of all age groups with a range of organ dysfunction related to severe acute illness that may complicate long-term illness. The range of organ dysfunction, together with drug interactions and other therapeutic interventions (e.g. haemodynamically active drugs and continuous renal replacement therapies), may strongly impact on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. In the last decade, it has become apparent that the intrinsic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties are the major determinants of in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial agents. PK/PD parameters are essential in facilitating the translation of microbiological activity into clinical situations, ensuring a successful outcome. In this review, we analyse the typical patterns of antimicrobial activity and the corresponding PK/PD parameters, with a special focus on a PK/PD dosing approach of the antimicrobial agent classes commonly utilised in the ICU setting.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the critically ill child

An understanding of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics can allow for a rational approach to prescribing medications for critically ill children. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, and the response to medications are affected by age and disease state. Various medications are used in the care of critically ill children. Many medications are prescribed for children based on dosing guidance from adult studies, however. Care providers must be cautious of the high risk for drug interactions and adverse reactions in the intensive care setting.

Effect of time, injury, age and ethanol on interpatient variability in valproic acid pharmacokinetics after traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in an increase in hepatic metabolism. The increased metabolism is in significant contrast to a large body of in vitro and in vivo data demonstrating that activation of the host-defence response downregulates hepatic metabolism. Theoretically, this occurs because of activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6. As part of a large double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of valproic acid for prophylaxis of post-traumatic seizures, we obtained extensive valproic acid concentration-time data. Valproic acid is a hepatically metabolised, low extraction-ratio drug. Therefore, unbound clearance (CL(u)) is equal to intrinsic or metabolic clearance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent effects of TBI on the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound valproic acid with the goal of identifying patient factors that may predict changes in total clearance (CL) and CL(u). In addition, by determining the factors that influence the magnitude and time course of induction of hepatic metabolism and understanding their interaction with the host-defence mediators, we can further our insight into the mechanism(s) responsible for the changes in CL and CL(u).

STUDY DESIGN

Valproic acid plasma concentration data were obtained from 158 TBI patients. Unbound valproic acid plasma concentrations were estimated using total valproic acid plasma and albumin concentrations following a Scatchard equation binding model previously developed in a subset of TBI patients. The effect of 13 patient factors on CL and CL(u) was evaluated initially in a univariate analysis. The significant factors were then included in a multiple linear regression analysis by use of step-wise selection and forward selection procedures.

RESULTS

CL and CL(u) were significantly increased after TBI in a time-dependent manner. The average increase was >75% by weeks 2 and 3 post-injury. The magnitude of the induction of CL was increased with decreased albumin concentrations, in addition to the presence of ethanol on admission, increased severity of head injury, tube feeding and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The magnitude of induction of CL(u) was increased by older age, presence of ethanol on admission, increased severity of head injury, tube feeding, TPN, and if the patient had a post-injury neurosurgical procedure. The time to normalisation of CL(u) was significantly longer in patients with head injury plus other injuries compared with those with head injury alone.

CONCLUSIONS

As has been reported with other drugs, TBI results in a significant increase in the metabolism of valproic acid. The patient factors identified in this study that resulted in an increase in the magnitude and time course of the induction of CL(u) (ethanol, older age, presence of a neurosurgical procedure, severity of TBI and presence of multiple non-TBI injuries) have all been reported to cause a shift to the anti-inflammatory mediators IL-4 and IL-10. This suggests that the increase in hepatic metabolism after TBI may be due to the increased presence of anti-inflammatory mediators in contrast to the inhibition effect of the pro-inflammatory mediators in non-TBI inflammation and infection.