Pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate

Topiramate for the treatment of epilepsy and other nervous system disorders

Initially synthesized as an oral hypoglycemic agent, topiramate was approved for use as an anticonvulsant in 1996. Its broad spectrum efficacy in epilepsy, including as monotherapy and in children, is well established. Topiramate has also been used in the management of nonepileptic neurologic and psychiatric conditions, including migraine prophylaxis (with firmly established efficacy), obesity (with some evidence of long-term maintenance of weight loss), substance dependence, bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain, and it has been investigated as a possible neuroprotective agent. Paresthesias and cognitive side effects are the most common troublesome adverse effects. Recent trends towards lower doses may help achieve the best combination of efficacy and tolerability.

Population pharmacokinetics of topiramate in adult patients with epilepsy using nonlinear mixed effects modelling

The objective of the study was to develop population pharmacokinetic model of topiramate (TPM) using nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach. Data were collected from 78 adult epileptic patients on mono- or co-therapy of TPM and other antiepileptic drugs, such as carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, phenobarbital and pregabalin. Steady-state TPM concentrations were determined in blood samples by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. A one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was used to fit the concentration-time TPM data. Volume of distribution of TPM was estimated at 0.575 l/kg. The influence of demographic, biochemical parameters and therapy characteristics of the patients on oral clearance (CL/F) was evaluated. Daily carbamazepine dose (DCBZ) and renal function estimated by Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula significantly (p<0.001) influenced CL/F and were included in the final model: CL/F · (l/h)=1.53(l/h) · [1+0.476 · DCBZ(mg/day)/1000(mg/day)] · EXP[0.00476 · [MDRD(ml/ min)-95.72(ml/min)]]. Increase of CL/F with DCBZ and MDRD was best described by linear and exponential models. Mean TPM CL/F during CBZ co-therapy was 2.46 l/h, which is higher for 60.8% than in patients not co-treated with CBZ. Evaluation by bootstrapping showed that the final model was stable. The predictive performance was evaluated by adequate plots and indicated satisfactory precision. This model allows individualisation of TPM dosing in routine patient care, especially useful for patients on different CBZ dosing regimen.

Comparative steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of immediate-release topiramate and USL255, a once-daily extended-release topiramate formulation

PURPOSE

Compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of immediate- and extended-release formulations of topiramate (TPM) in healthy subjects following multiple dosing, and evaluate maintenance of topiramate exposures after switching formulations.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, single-center, two-way crossover, multiple-dose study comparing the steady-state PK profile of once-daily extended-release topiramate (USL255) to immediate-release topiramate (TPM-IR) administered twice-daily. The TPM PK profile was evaluated using standard PK parameters (e.g., AUC0-24 , Cmax , Cmin ) as well as less common PK criteria such as fluctuation index (FI), peak occupancy time (POT), and percent coefficient of variation (%CV). In addition, partial AUC (AUCp ) analyses provided comparisons of the AUC profiles over predetermined time intervals between TPM-IR and USL255. Pharmacokinetic equivalence between formulations was defined as containment of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the USL255/TPM-IR geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratio within the equivalence limits of 80-125%. The effect of switching between treatments was assessed by evaluating equivalence of PK parameters between the day prior to formulation switch and the day immediately following formulation switch. Maintenance of steady state after switching formulations was also evaluated by comparing the slope between Cmin values at formulation switch and 24 h postswitch. Tolerability was evaluated through adverse event monitoring, vital sign measurements, and clinical laboratory evaluations.

KEY FINDINGS

USL255 was well tolerated and provided TPM plasma exposure equivalent to TPM-IR at various time intervals. USL255 also demonstrated a significantly lower Cmax (p < 0.001) and higher Cmin (p < 0.001), longer tmax , lower %CV, and 26% decreased FI, as compared with TPM-IR. Further, switching between TPM-IR and USL255 did not affect TPM concentrations, including Cmin , immediately after transitioning and at steady state.

SIGNIFICANCE

As compared with TPM-IR, USL255 provided equivalent plasma exposure with an extended absorption profile. Therefore, USL255 offers a once-daily alternative to twice-daily TPM-IR, with reduced TPM fluctuations.

Clinical utility of phentermine/topiramate (Qsymia™) combination for the treatment of obesity

Qsymia™ (Vivus Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA), a combination of phentermine and delayed-release topiramate, has been available in the US since September 2012 for the treatment of obesity. Phentermine is an anorexigenic agent, which is approved for the short-term treatment of obesity, while topiramate is approved for nonweight loss indications - seizure disorders and migraine prophylaxis. The amount of weight loss achieved with combination therapy is of a greater magnitude than what could be achieved with either agent alone. Adverse events that occur with the combination therapy are in line with the known side effect profiles of the constituent drugs; teratogenicity, a slight increase in heart rate, psychiatric and cognitive adverse effects, and metabolic acidosis are concerns.

Topiramate as an adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory status epilepticus: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is the most severe manifestation of status epilepticus (SE), often requiring intensive care and therapeutic coma. It is associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment involves both intravenous anaesthetics and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that can be administrated intravenously, by nasogastric tube or by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Experience with some of the newer AEDs for the treatment of RSE is restricted and higher-class evidence regarding tolerability and efficacy is lacking. Topiramate is a potent broad-spectrum AED with several modes of action, including blockade of the ionotropic glutamatergic AMPA receptor, which is likely to be an important mechanism for the treatment of SE. While there is no commercially available intravenous formulation, topiramate can be administered enterally, which may make it suitable for the treatment of RSE.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability, safety profile and efficacy of adjunctive and enterally administered topiramate in patients with RSE.

METHODS

A medical chart review was performed of all consecutive patients treated for RSE between August 2004 and December 2011 at the ICU of the University Hospital Basel (Basel, Switzerland).

RESULTS

113 (43%) of all consecutive 268 patients with SE developed RSE. Of those, 35 (31%) were treated with topiramate. Median age was 60.5 years. Topiramate was used as an add-on treatment after 1-6 (median 4) prior administered AEDs had failed. It was introduced after a median of 2 (range 2-23) days for a duration of 1-24 (median 3) days. The response rate after topiramate administration as the third AED was 86% (6/7 patients), and remained stable at 67% after administration as the fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh AED when the groups of successfully and probably successfully treated patients were pooled. Overall, RSE was terminated in 71% of patients within 72 hours after first administration of topiramate, in 9% of patients, within 24 hours (none in the 800 mg/day group; 9% in the 400-799 mg/day group; and 11% in the <400 mg/day group). Mortality was 31% and was not strictly dependent on failure to terminate RSE, but also on the underlying aetiology of RSE. There were no serious or fatal adverse events directly attributable to topiramate. Adverse effects included slight hyperchloremic acidosis and hyperammonemia (all associated with co-medication with valproic acid).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with enterally administered topiramate was feasible, well tolerated and had a good safety profile in patients with RSE in this observational, single-centre, cohort study. Refractory SE was terminated in the majority of patients within 3 days after initiation of topiramate. Prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate topiramate for the treatment of RSE.

Nicotine intake and smoking topography in smokers with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

Cigarette smoking behavior in bipolar disorder (BPD), including the effects of mood-stabilizing medications, has not been well characterized.

METHODS

We compared serum nicotine, nicotine metabolite levels, and smoking topography in 75 smokers with BPD to 86 control smokers (CON). For some comparisons, an additional control group of 75 smokers with schizophrenia (SCZ) were included.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the BPD and CON groups in baseline smoking characteristics or serum nicotine or cotinine levels. Fifty-one smokers with BPD (68.9%) were taking one of the following mood stabilizers: valproic acid, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lithium, or topiramate. The 3-hydroxycotinine-to-cotinine ratio, a marker of cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) metabolic activity, was significantly higher in BPD versus CON and versus SCZ (0.68 versus 0.49 versus 0.54; p =0.002). The difference between groups, however, was no longer significant when the analysis was repeated with those taking hepatic enzyme-inducing drugs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate) included as a covariate. The time between puffs, or interpuff interval (IPI), was shorter in BPD versus CON by an average of 3.0sec (p<0.05), although this was no longer significant when we removed smokers from the analysis of those taking hepatic enzyme inducers.

CONCLUSIONS

Smokers with BPD are not different from CON on most measures of nicotine intake and smoking topography. We found an increased rate of nicotine metabolism in smokers taking mood stabilizers that are hepatic enzyme inducers, including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate. Smokers with rapid nicotine metabolism might be expected to smoke more intensely to compensate for the more rapid disappearance of nicotine from the blood and brain, and may have more difficulty in quitting smoking, although this requires further study.

Clinically significant psychotropic drug-drug interactions in the primary care setting

In recent years, the growing numbers of patients seeking care for a wide range of psychiatric illnesses in the primary care setting has resulted in an increase in the number of psychotropic medications prescribed. Along with the increased utilization of psychotropic medications, considerable variability is noted in the prescribing patterns of primary care providers and psychiatrists. Because psychiatric patients also suffer from a number of additional medical comorbidities, the increased utilization of psychotropic medications presents an elevated risk of clinically significant drug interactions in these patients. While life-threatening drug interactions are rare, clinically significant drug interactions impacting drug response or appearance of serious adverse drug reactions have been documented and can impact long-term outcomes. Additionally, the impact of genetic variability on the psychotropic drug's pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics may further complicate drug therapy. Increased awareness of clinically relevant psychotropic drug interactions can aid clinicians to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes in patients in the primary care setting.

Clinical Analysis for Brain Tumor-Related Epilepsy during Chemotherapy for Systemic Cancer with Single Brain Metastasis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective observational study was to determine the incidence, patterns, and predisposing factors for brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) during chemotherapy for systemic cancer with single brain metastasis (BM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2006 and June 2010, 103 patients who underwent chemotherapy for systemic cancer with single BM were enrolled. We compared the clinical factors of patients and BM between patients with and without BTRE. We determined the number of patients with BTRE attacks, and seizure-free survival according to the following comparative groups: presence vs. absence of a history of BTRE; high-risk vs. low-risk groups; and presence vs. absence of disease-progression of BM.

RESULTS

Ninety-three of 103 patients (90.3%) remained seizure-free during chemotherapy. The seizure-free rates were 88.9% and 91.0% among patients with or without a history of BTRE, respectively (p=0.694), 87.8% and 92.6% among high- and low-risk patients (p=0.427), respectively, and 62.5% and 98.7% among patients with or without disease-progression of BM (p=0.001), retrospectively. Based on multivariate analysis, the significance of abnormal findings on electroencephalogram (EEG) (p=0.017), and the absence of disease-progression of BM (p=0.001) had an association with seizure-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The significance of abnormal findings on EEG, and disease-progression of BM play important roles in the development of BTRE during chemotherapy for systemic cancer with BM.

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of USL255, a new once-daily extended-release formulation of topiramate

PURPOSE

To compare the pharmacokinetics of USL255, a once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation of topiramate (TPM), with Topamax (immediate-release TPM) in healthy subjects after oral dosing and evaluate the effect of food on USL255 bioavailability and pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

This randomized, single-center, open-label, cross-over design study had three dosing periods separated by 21 days of washout between treatments. Thirty-six volunteers received single doses of USL255 (200 mg) in fasted and fed conditions and two doses of Topamax (100 mg) administered 12 h apart. TPM plasma samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods.

KEY FINDINGS

USL255 fasted pharmacokinetic parameters [point estimate (90% confidence interval, CI) compared to Topamax] were: relative bioavailability (F) 91.2% (84-99%), peak plasma concentration (C(max)) USL255/Topamax-ratio 59% (53-65%), time to reach C(max) (t(max)) 19.5 ± 7.2 h, accumulation ratio (R(ac)) 3.9 ± 1.2, effective half-life (t(1/2,eff)) 55.7 ± 19.9 h, terminal half-life (t(1/2,z)) 80.2 ± 14.2 h, and peak-occupancy-time (POT) 12.1 ± 4.0 h. Although the F and C(max) were unaffected by food, R(ac) and t(1/2,eff) increased to 4.9 ± 0.9, and 72.5 ± 15.4 h, respectively. In contrast to t(1/2,z,) t(1/2,eff) reflects absorption rate; therefore, USL255's t(1/2,eff) was significantly longer than Topamax's t(1/2,eff) (37.1 ± 6.5 h).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although bioequivalent to Topamax in extent of absorption, USL255 had a slower absorption rate as reflected in its lower C(max) and longer t(max), larger POT and longer t(1/2,eff), and similar R(ac) values to that of Topamax (q12 h). This relative flat plasma profile allows for once-daily dosing with diminished fluctuations in TPM plasma levels. In addition, neither USL255's peak nor extent of plasma exposure of TPM was affected by food.

Clinical pharmacology of topiramate in migraine prevention

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a widespread disorder. Migraine patients experience worse health-related quality of life than the general population. The availability of effective and tolerable treatments for this disorder is an important medical need. This narrative review focuses on the clinical pharmacology of topiramate, an antiepileptic drug that was approved for the prophylaxis of migraine where it should act as a neuromodulator.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed database search (from 2000 to 24 January 2011) and a review of the human studies published on topiramate and migraine was conducted.

EXPERT OPINION

Topiramate is an important option for the prophylaxis of migraine and is of proven efficacy and tolerability. It has also been studied in chronic migraine with encouraging results, even in patients with medication overuse. However, in migraine prevention its efficacy is comparable to the other first-line drugs and there are no published trials with a superiority design which can establish topiramate's role in the available therapeutic armamentarium.

Prescribing contraceptives for women with schizophrenia

Although women with serious mental illness have high rates of lifetime sexual partners, they infrequently use contraception. Consequently, the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections is high in this population. In addition, while the overall rate of pregnancy in women with schizophrenia of child-bearing age is lower than in the general population, the percentage of pregnancies that are unwanted is higher than that in the general population. The objective of this paper is to help clinicians explore knowledge of appropriate methods of contraception for women who suffer from schizophrenia. The authors reviewed recent literature on the use of contraceptive methods by women with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotic and adjunctive medications. Contraceptive counseling to women and their partners is an important part of comprehensive care for women with serious and persistent mental illness. Women with schizophrenia who smoke, are overweight, or have diabetes, migraine, cardiovascular disease, or a family history of breast cancer should be offered non-hormonal contraception. Women with more than one sexual partner should be advised on barrier methods in addition to any other contraceptive measures they are using. Clinicians should be alert for potential interactions among oral hormonal contraceptives, smoking, and therapeutic drugs. Long-lasting contraceptive methods, such as intrauterine devices, progesterone depot injections, or tubal ligation are reasonable options for women having no wish to further expand their families.

Topiramate: safety and efficacy of its use in the prevention and treatment of migraine

Migraine headaches are typically episodic in nature and may affect nearly 10% of the population. In addition to treatment, prevention of subsequent episodes or progression to a chronic migraine state is an important therapeutic area. Topiramate is a centrally acting medication approved for both the prevention of seizures and migraine headache. At this time, the exact mechanism of how topiramate assists in migraine prevention is unknown. Several large randomized, controlled trials have aided in establishing topiramate's role in migraine prevention. Despite a favorable pharmacokinetic and adverse effect profile established in clinical trials, several additional studies, case reports and toxicology reports have demonstrated topiramate as a cause of cognitive and behavioural changes. The use of topiramate in migraine prevention can improve a patient's quality of life and is a cost-effective option for migraine prevention.

Modern methods for analysis of antiepileptic drugs in the biological fluids for pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and therapeutic drug monitoring

Epilepsy is a chronic disease occurring in approximately 1.0% of the world's population. About 30% of the epileptic patients treated with availably antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) continue to have seizures and are considered therapy-resistant or refractory patients. The ultimate goal for the use of AEDs is complete cessation of seizures without side effects. Because of a narrow therapeutic index of AEDs, a complete understanding of its clinical pharmacokinetics is essential for understanding of the pharmacodynamics of these drugs. These drug concentrations in biological fluids serve as surrogate markers and can be used to guide or target drug dosing. Because early studies demonstrated clinical and/or electroencephalographic correlations with serum concentrations of several AEDs, It has been almost 50 years since clinicians started using plasma concentrations of AEDs to optimize pharmacotherapy in patients with epilepsy. Therefore, validated analytical method for concentrations of AEDs in biological fluids is a necessity in order to explore pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and TDM in various clinical situations. There are hundreds of published articles on the analysis of specific AEDs by a wide variety of analytical methods in biological samples have appears over the past decade. This review intends to provide an updated, concise overview on the modern method development for monitoring AEDs for pharmacokinetic studies, bioequivalence and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Phenobarbital for neonatal seizures in hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: a pharmacokinetic study during whole body hypothermia

PURPOSE

Therapeutic hypothermia has recently been introduced to treat term newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, of whom more than half have seizures. Phenobarbital is widely used to treat neonatal seizures, but it is unknown whether its pharmacokinetics is affected by hypothermia. We evaluated the influence of hypothermia on phenobarbital pharmacokinetics in asphyxiated newborns.

METHODS

Nineteen term asphyxiated newborns treated with mild whole body hypothermia, started within 6 h after birth and protracted for 72 h, received phenobarbital for clinical seizures. Treatment schedule consisted of a loading dose of 20 mg/kg, titrated to response, up to a maximum dose of 40 mg/kg, followed by a maintenance dose of 2.5 or 1.5 mg/kg every 12 h. Phenobarbital concentrations were measured on 28 dried blood spots in each newborn.

KEY FINDINGS

Eighteen newborns showed plasma concentrations within the reference range after receiving a loading dose of 20 mg/kg. In the remaining newborn, who had received a loading dose of 35 mg/kg, phenobarbital concentrations exceeded the upper reference limit. Phenobarbital concentrations reached a virtual steady state in all newborns. Pharmacokinetic parameters were then calculated. Minimum and maximum concentration (24.7 ± 8.8 and 30.63 ± 10.3 mg/L), average plasma concentration (27.37 ± 9.4 mg/L), and half-life (173.9 ± 62.5 h) were considerably higher than reported in literature for normothermic newborns. Pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between infants receiving different maintenance doses.

SIGNIFICANCE

Phenobarbital administered to newborns under whole body hypothermia results in higher plasma concentrations and longer half-lives than expected in normothermic newborns.

Rationalization and prediction of in vivo metabolite exposures: the role of metabolite kinetics, clearance predictions and in vitro parameters

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Due to growing concerns over toxic or active metabolites, significant efforts have been focused on qualitative identification of potential in vivo metabolites from in vitro data. However, limited tools are available to quantitatively predict their human exposures.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Theory of clearance predictions and metabolite kinetics is reviewed together with supporting experimental data. In vitro and in vivo data of known circulating metabolites and their parent drugs were collected and the predictions of in vivo exposures of the metabolites were evaluated.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The theory and data reviewed will be useful in early identification of human metabolites that will circulate at significant levels in vivo and help in designing in vivo studies that focus on characterization of metabolites. It will also assist in rationalization of metabolite-to-parent ratios used as markers of specific enzyme activity.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The relative importance of a metabolite in comparison to the parent compound as well as other metabolites in vivo can only be predicted using the metabolite's in vitro formation and elimination clearances, and the in vivo disposition of a metabolite can only be rationalized when the elimination pathways of that metabolite are known.

Topiramate pharmacokinetics in infants and young children: contribution of population analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the range of topiramate (TPM) concentrations obtained in children under 4 with the recommended dosage regimen (3-9 mg/kg/day) and to compare them to adult target ranges.

METHODS

The population pharmacokinetic model developed for TPM, with/without enzyme inducer antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) in children was used to determine dosage regimens providing AUC and trough concentrations (C(trough)s) within the adult ranges.

RESULTS

TPM pharmacokinetics was described by a one-compartment model. EIAEDs increased the apparent clearance (CL/F) and age and body weight increased the apparent distribution volume (Vd/F). Mean population estimates (% CV interindividual variability) were 0.608/1.15 L/h (13%) for CL/F without/with EIAEDs, 28.6L (0.2%) for Vd/F and 1.4h(-1) (124%) for the absorption rate constant. Mean AUC(0-12h) reached with a 2mg/kg/day dosing regimen was within described range. A 6-16 mg/kg/day dose depending on age allowed reaching target C(trough) range with the highest probability. Combined EIAEDs led to a 2- and 3-fold decrease in AUC and C(trough), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TPM dosage of 2/4 mg/kg/day (without/with EIEADs, respectively) provides the AUC reported in adults. In children under 4, alternative dosing regimen should be considered mainly when associated to EIAED to reach C(trough) comparable to adult values.

New drugs in migraine treatment and prophylaxis: telcagepant and topiramate

Although the triptan drugs provide effective relief from migraine for many patients, a substantial number of affected individuals are unresponsive to these compounds, and such therapy can also lead to a range of adverse effects. Telcagepant represents a new class of antimigraine drug-the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor blockers. This compound exerts its effects by blocking receptors for the calcitonin-gene-related peptide at several sites in the trigeminal and central nervous systems, resulting in pain relief. Telcagepant does not cause vasoconstriction, a major limitation in the use of triptans. Comparisons with triptans in clinical trials for acute treatment of migraine attacks revealed clinical effects similar to those of triptans but better than those of placebo. Telcagepant might provide hope for those who have a poor response to, or are unable to use, older drugs. In patients who need prophylaxis because of frequent attacks of migraine, topiramate is a first-line drug for migraine prevention in many countries; it is generally safe and reasonably well tolerated. Data suggest that topiramate could aid reversion of chronic migraine to episodic migraine.

Clinical effects and toxicokinetic evaluation following massive topiramate ingestion

Topiramate is used to treat a variety of neurologic and psychiatric diseases due to its benign safety profile. Data regarding the toxicity and toxicokinetics of topiramate in acute overdose are limited. A case of massive, acute ingestion resulting in the highest reported topiramate level is presented, including toxicokinetic evaluation. A 37-year-old woman presented with coma unresponsive to naloxone following topiramate ingestion. She had normal vital signs without respiratory depression. She was intubated for airway protection, given 3.5 mg lorazepam IV for facial and neck muscle twitching, and transferred to our facility. No additional sedation was required for 18 h on the ventilator. Following mental status improvement, the patient was extubated. Confusion, dysarthria, and imbalance resolved over the next 2 days. Nonanion gap metabolic acidosis persisted for 3 days. Peak serum topiramate level was 356.6 microg/ml (reference range, 5-20 microg/ml). Massive topiramate ingestion led to prolonged coma with normal vital signs and nonanion gap metabolic acidosis. Coma of this severity has not been previously reported. Serum half-life, which has not been studied after overdose, was 16 h. Despite the large ingestion and significant presenting symptoms, the patient recovered fully with supportive intensive care alone. Massive acute topiramate ingestion may lead to nonanion gap metabolic acidosis and prolonged coma which resolves with intensive supportive care. Toxicokinetic data following large, suicidal ingestion of topiramate were similar to previously published pharmacokinetic information.

Review of topiramate for the treatment of epilepsy in elderly patients

Individuals over 65 years of age experience the new onset of seizures at a prevalence rate of roughly twice that of younger adults. Differences in physiology, need of concomitant medications, and liability for cognitive deficits in this population, make the choice of anticonvulsant drugs especially important. This paper reviews topiramate (TPM), a treatment for many types of seizures, with the above risks in mind. In particular, we discuss efficacy and pharmacokinetics with emphasis on the older patient, and adverse events in both the younger and older adult. With most studies of TPM-induced cognitive deficits having been performed in younger adults and volunteers, we discuss the implications for the older adult. Even in studies of younger individuals, up to 50% discontinue TPM because of intolerable cognitive deficits. Most studies find specific declines in working memory and verbal fluency. In conclusion, we give recommendations for use of this antiepileptic drug in this population.

Hyperhomocysteinemia in epileptic patients on new antiepileptic drugs

PURPOSE

Older enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may induce supraphysiologic plasma concentrations of total (t) homocysteine (Hcy). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of new AEDs on plasma tHcy levels.

METHODS

Patients 18-50 years of age, on AEDs monotherapy, with no other known cause of hyper-tHcy were enrolled. Plasma tHcy, folate, vitamin B(12), and AEDs levels were determined by standard high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. Methylenetetrahydrofolate-reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms were checked using Puregene genomic DNA purification system (Gentra, Celbio, Italy). A group of healthy volunteers matched for age and sex was taken as control.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-nine patients (151 on newer and 108 on older AEDs) and 231 controls were enrolled. Plasma tHcy levels were significantly higher [mean values, standard error (SE) 16.8, 0.4 vs. 9.1, 0.2 microm; physiologic range 5-13 microm] and folate lower (6.3, 0.1 vs. 9.3, 0.1 nm; normal > 6.8 nm) in patients compared to controls. Patients treated with oxcarbazepine, topiramate, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital exhibited mean plasma tHcy levels above the physiologic range [mean values (SE) 16 (0.8), 19.1 (0.8), 20.5 (1.0), and 18.5 (1.5) microm, respectively]. Conversely, normal tHcy concentrations were observed in the lamotrigine and levetiracetam groups [both 11.1 (0.5) microm].

DISCUSSION

Oxcarbazepine and topiramate might cause hyper-tHcy, most likely because of the capacity of these agents to induce the hepatic enzymes. Because literature data suggest that hyper-tHcy may contribute to the development of cerebrovascular diseases and brain atrophy, a supplement of folate can be considered in these patients to normalize plasma tHcy.

Pharmacokinetics of topiramate during pregnancy

PURPOSE

To study the effects of pregnancy on plasma concentrations of topiramate (TPM).

METHODS

An established routine fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) method was used to determine TPM concentrations in 15 women with epilepsy treated with TPM during altogether 17 pregnancies.

RESULTS

In 10 pregnancies, where samples were available from all three trimesters, the mean TPM dose/concentration ratio (D/C-ratio) was significantly higher than outside pregnancy baseline value 37.3 L/day (+/-15.9), during the 2nd, 67.5L/day (+/-23.4), and the 3rd trimester, 65.1L/day (+/-30.4), but not during the 1st, 49.4 L/day (+/-29.4). Including seven additional pregnancies enrolled late with data only from the 3rd trimester, the mean D/C-ratio during the 3rd trimester was 67.4 L/day (+/-27.5) compared to baseline, 38.8L/day (+/-18.0), an average increase by 71.8%. There was a pronounced intra-individual variability in alterations in D/C-ratios during pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show a significant pregnancy-related increase in D/C-ratios of TPM suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring might be of value.

Exploring efficacy and tolerability outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy receiving adjunctive topiramate at different titration rates--an exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

To compare rapid vs regular titration of topiramate concerning efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open-label, prospective, single-center study exploring efficacy and tolerability of two adjunctive dosing regimens of topiramate (TPM) in adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. Based on investigator judgment, 21 of 50 consecutive patients received a rapid titration (starting dose 50 mg/day, stepwise increase with 50 mg/day after 3 days each until reaching the target dose), while the other 29 patients received titration according to the German prescribing information (starting dose 25 mg/day, stepwise increase with 25-50 mg/day every 7 days). Patients were observed until the target dose was reached and 3 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Mean final dosages were 136 mg/day (regular titration) and 213 mg/day (rapid titration). Efficacy and tolerability measures did not differ significantly. Forty-six percent of all patients experienced a seizure reduction of > or = 50%; 14% became seizure free. No serious adverse events occurred. The most common adverse effects were tiredness (20%), memory and language difficulties (18% each), slowness in thinking and speech (10%), psychomotor disturbance (8%) and paresthesia (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that rapid and conventional titration generate similar tolerability, safety and effectiveness in selected patients.

Practical guidelines for the use of new generation antipsychotic drugs (except clozapine) in adult individuals with intellectual disabilities

New generation antipsychotic (NGA) drugs introduced to the US market after clozapine (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) are frequently used in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, there is very limited research to fully establish evidence-based or personalized medicine approaches for their use in this population. These guidelines take a pragmatic approach to establishing frameworks for their use by utilizing the prescribing information and reviewing the available literature on other relevant neuropsychiatric disorders. In the absence of expert consensus guidance and well-controlled comparison trials, we present a set of guidelines to inform initiation, dosing and monitoring of use in adults. Further, in these guidelines we provide practical information on drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, and a brief review of discontinuation syndromes, potential for abuse, use during pregnancy and cost considerations. We also provide drug utilization review forms for each NGA to facilitate implementation of these guidelines, these guidelines provide a practical and necessary resource for practitioners treating psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors in adult individuals with ID.

Conversion from valproic acid onto topiramate in adolescents and adults with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To explore efficacy and tolerability outcomes of topiramate (TPM) in patients with epilepsy transitioning from valproic acid (VPA) because of insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability onto TPM.

METHODS

Multicenter, open label, single arm, non-interventional study examining patients (> or =12 years) with epilepsy, transitioning onto TPM from baseline mono-or combination therapy with VPA. TPM was added onto the existing antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and started at a dose of 25 mg once daily. The dose was titrated up with 25 mg/day increments, once every 1-2 weeks, until a final dose between 50-200 mg/day was reached. Based on clinical judgment, the treating physician decided whether or not and when the existing AED treatment especially with VPA could be withdrawn. Documented were type and frequency of seizures, TPM dose, quality of life (QOLIE-10 questionnaire), subjective perception of improvement, and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-seven patients (59% women, mean age 41 years) switched from baseline VPA treatment onto TPM because of insufficient efficacy (61%) and/or poor tolerability (81%). Average duration of follow-up was 20.3 weeks with an overall discontinuation rate of 16.3% of patients, mainly because of AE (in 8.2% of 147 patients). At study endpoint, the intended shift to TPM monotherapy was achieved in 70% of patients at a median dose of 150 mg/day. A seizure reduction of > or =50% was achieved in 75% of patients in the last scheduled period (week 8-20), and 51% of patients entering that period remained seizure-free. Quality of life improved significantly as compared with baseline for all domains of QOLIE-10 (P < 0.001). Most frequent AEs were weight decrease (4.8%), paraesthesia and fatigue (4.1% each), speech disorder and headaches (2.7% each).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with epilepsy not satisfactorily treated with VPA, conversion to TPM was associated with improved seizure control as well as improvement in several aspects of quality of life.

Antiepileptic drug interactions

INTRODUCTION

Antiepileptics are drugs used in the long-term treatment of epilepsy and other conditions such as pain or psychiatric diseases. They are often administered as polytherapy or in combination with other treatments. It is therefore important to know their potential interactions (with each other and with other substances) in order to avoid altering their efficacy or potentiating their side effects.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review these aspects and stress the most important interactions in day-to-day clinical practice.

RESULTS

Older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproic acid can significantly interfere not only with each other and other AEDs, but also with other treatments. Although newer AEDs have a more favourable pharmacokinetic profile, they are not entirely exempt from interactions and they are also commonly administered in combination with older AEDs. Another aspect that should be considered is the existence of any clinically important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients requiring the continuous administration of other treatments.

CONCLUSION

We must be aware of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of AEDs. Because of a lack of significant interactions, drugs such as levetiracetam, gabapentin or pregabalin can be recommended in particular groups such as patients with cancer, transplants, anticoagulant treatments or HIV infection. In all cases, it is important to ensure AED efficacy and prevent serious complications.

Comparing topiramate with naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence

AIM

To compare the efficacy of topiramate with naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence.

DESIGN

The investigation was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study carried out at the University of São Paulo, Brazil.

SAMPLE

A total of 155 patients, 18-60 years of age, with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis of alcohol dependence.

METHODS

After a 1-week detoxification period, patients were assigned randomly to receive topiramate (induction to 300 mg/day), naltrexone (50 mg/day) or placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Time to first relapse (consumption of >60 g ethyl alcohol), cumulative abstinence duration and weeks of heavy drinking.

FINDINGS

In intention-to-treat analyses, topiramate was statistically superior to placebo on a number of measures including time to first relapse (7.8 versus 5.0 weeks), cumulative abstinence duration (8.2 versus 5.6 weeks), weeks of heavy drinking (3.4 versus 5.9) and percentage of subjects abstinent at 4 weeks (67.3 versus 42.6) and 8 weeks (61.5 versus 31.5), but not 12 weeks (46.2 versus 27.8).

RESULTS

remained significant after controlling for Alcoholics Anonymous attendance, which was higher in topiramate than in other groups. There were no significant differences between naltrexone versus placebo or naltrexone versus topiramate groups, but naltrexone showed trends toward inferior outcomes when compared to topiramate.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the efficacy of topiramate in the relapse prevention of alcoholism. Suggestive evidence was also obtained for superiority of topiramate versus naltrexone, but this needs to be verified in future research with larger sample sizes.

Topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of newly or recently diagnosed epilepsy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of topiramate (TPM) as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy has been established in placebo-controlled clinical trials. Clinical trials of antiepileptic monotherapy usually evaluate low and high doses of study drug or compare study drug with another active agent.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews available evidence for the use of TPM as monotherapy in patients with newly or recently diagnosed epilepsy.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SCISEARCH, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (all years) for reports of controlled trials of TPM monotherapy in patients with recently diagnosed (within the previous 3 years) epilepsy was conducted in January 2008 using the terms topiramate, epilepsy, newly diagnosed, recently diagnosed, and monotherapy. Identified trials were included in the review if they were published in peer-reviewed journals and enrolled > or = 20 patients.

RESULTS

Three randomized, double-blind, controlled trials met the criteria for inclusion in the review. In a comparison of TPM 50 and 500 mg/d, the higher dose was associated with significantly greater freedom from seizures at 6 months compared with the lower dose (54% vs 39%, respectively; P = 0.02). The time to first seizure was significantly associated with mean plasma TPM concentrations (P = 0.015). In a comparison of TPM 50 and 400 mg/d, the time to first seizure was significantly longer with the higher dose compared with the lower dose (P<0.001, Kaplan-Meier analysis), and the probability of 12-month seizure freedom was significantly higher (76% vs 59%, respectively; P = 0.001). Again, the time to first seizure was significantly associated with mean plasma TPM concentrations (P = 0.029). In a comparative study of TPM 100 and 200 mg/d, carbamazepine 600 mg/d, and valproate 1250 mg/d, there was no significant difference in rates of 6-month seizure freedom with TPM 100 and 200 mg/d (49% and 44%, respectively), carbamazepine (44%), and valproate (44%). Adverse events in the 3 studies were similar between TPM dose groups, although the incidence generally increased with increasing doses, occurred early in treatment, and decreased with prolonged therapy. In a pooled analysis of the 3 trials, the most commonly occurring adverse events during dose titration were paresthesia (25%), fatigue (16%), dizziness (13%), somnolence (13%), and nausea (10%); the most frequent adverse events during maintenance therapy were headache (20%), decreased appetite (11%), and weight loss (11%).

CONCLUSION

In the 3 studies reviewed, TPM monotherapy was effective and generally well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

Tratamento das epilepsias generalizadas idiopáticas

As epilepsias generalizadas idiopáticas (EGIs) correspondem a um-terço de todas as epilepsias. Apesar desta elevada freqüência, as EGIs permanecem pouco reconhecidas. As características clínicas são fundamentais para o diagnóstico. Neste grupo de epilepsias, todos os tipos de crises generalizadas podem ocorrer especialmente as crises tônico-clônicas generalizadas, as crises mioclônicas e as crises de ausência. O eletroencefograma é bastante sugestivo do diagnóstico quando evidencia os típicos complexos espículas ou poliespículas-onda lenta, generalizados, simétricos e com atividade de base normal. De acordo com o tipo de crise predominante e com a idade de início das crises, as EGIs são divididas em subsíndromes. A importância do diagnóstico preciso está relacionada com a elevada porcentagem de indivíduos livre de crises quando tratados com a medicação antiepiléptica apropriada. Por outro lado, o uso de algumas medicações antiepilépticas como carbamazepina e fenitoína pode exacerbar as crises ou até mesmo induzir estado de mal epiléptico em determinadas subsíndromes. Neste artigo, revisamos as principais medicações antiepilépticas utilizadas no tratamento das EGIs bem como alguns aspectos práticos no tratamento das subsíndromes mais freqüentes.

Epilepsy outcomes in elderly treated with topiramate

OBJECTIVES

To explore effectiveness, tolerability and quality of life in elderly patients with epilepsy treated with topiramate.

METHODS

One year, open-label, flexible-dosing clinical trial.

RESULTS

One hundred and seven patients (mean age 69 years, 53% men) were studied during 273 +/- 141 days. The average final dose in monotherapy was 98 mg/day vs 153 mg/day in adjunctive treatment. Mean monthly cumulative seizure frequency decreased from 3.7 +/- 15 to 1.6 +/- 7.7 (n = 101, P < 0.0001), 78% of patients with seizures at baseline (n = 102) achieved at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency, 44% were seizure-free throughout the trial. Total scores on the quality of life in epilepsy inventory (QOLIE-31) improved from 57 +/- 17 to 68 +/- 18 (n = 64, P < 0.0001). The most frequently reported adverse events included convulsions, dizziness and tiredness.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients treated with topiramate showed marked reductions in seizures, good tolerability and significant improvements in several aspects of quality of life.

Spotlight on topiramate in epilepsy

Topiramate (Topamax) is a structurally novel broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with established efficacy as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures, partial seizures with or without generalized seizures, and seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The incidence and severity of many adverse events, including CNS-related events, may be reduced through the use of slow titration to effective and well tolerated dosages. It is associated with few clinically significant interactions with other drugs, is effective when used with other AEDs, is not associated with drug-induced weight gain and, at lower dosages, does not interfere with the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. Therefore, topiramate is a valuable option as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy in adult and paediatric patients.

Conversion from carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine to topiramate in adolescents and adults with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To explore effectiveness, tolerability and changes in quality of life in patients with epilepsy converting to topiramate (TPM) from carbamazepine (CBZ) or oxcarbazepine (OXC) due to insufficient effectiveness and/or tolerability.

METHODS

A multicenter, open-label, non-interventional trial was used to examine patients (> or = 12 years) with epilepsy, changing to TPM monotherapy from baseline mono- or combination therapy with CBZ or OXC. TPM was added to the existing antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and started at a dose of 25 mg once daily. The dose was titrated up with 25 mg/day increments, once every 1-2 weeks, until a final dose between 50 and 200 mg/day was reached. On the basis of clinical judgment, the treating physician decided whether or not the existing AED treatment with CBZ or OXC could then be withdrawn. Type and number of seizures, preferred TPM dose, quality of life (QOLIE-10 questionnaire), subjective perception of improvement and adverse events (AE) were documented.

RESULTS

140 patients (53.5% women, mean age 47 years) decided to switch to TPM due to insufficient effectiveness (75% of patients) and/or poor tolerability (80%) of the CBZ/OXC treatment. Average duration of follow-up was 24 weeks with an overall discontinuation rate of 19.3%, mainly due to AEs (12.1%). At study endpoint, the intended shift to TPM monotherapy was achieved in 73% of patients at a median TPM dose of 100 mg/day. A seizure reduction of > or = 50% was achieved in 91% of patients in the last scheduled period (weeks 12-26); 62% of patients entering that period remained seizure free. Quality of life at endpoint improved significantly when compared with baseline for all domains of QOLIE-10 (P < 0.001). Most frequent AEs (reported by > or = 5% of patients) were paresthesia (9.3%), weight loss (7.9%), convulsions (5.7%) and memory disorders (5.0%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with epilepsy, previously not satisfactorily treated with CBZ or OXC, conversion to TPM may result in an improvement in seizure control as well as in quality of life.

Topiramate: a review of its use in the treatment of epilepsy

Topiramate (Topamax) is a structurally novel broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with established efficacy as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients with generalised tonic-clonic seizures, partial seizures with or without generalised seizures, and seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The incidence and severity of many adverse events, including CNS-related events, may be reduced through the use of slow titration to effective and well tolerated dosages. It is associated with few clinically significant interactions with other drugs, is effective when used with other AEDs, is not associated with drug-induced weight gain and, at lower dosages, does not interfere with the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. Therefore, topiramate is a valuable option as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy in adult and paediatric patients.

Molecular pharmacodynamics, clinical therapeutics, and pharmacokinetics of topiramate

Topiramate (TPM; TOPAMAX) is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) that is approved in many world markets for preventing or reducing the frequency of epileptic seizures (as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy), and for the prophylaxis of migraine. TPM, a sulfamate derivative of the naturally occurring sugar D-fructose, possesses several pharmacodynamic properties that may contribute to its clinically useful attributes, and to its observed adverse effects. The sulfamate moiety is essential, but not sufficient, for its pharmacodynamic properties. In this review, we discuss the known pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of TPM, as well as its various clinically beneficial and adverse effects.

Topiramate in the treatment of partial and generalized epilepsy

Topiramate (TPM) is a widely-used drug for the treatment of epilepsy. It is useful for several types of partial-onset and generalized-onset seizures, and is therefore considered a broad-spectrum agent. It is also effective as a prophylactic against migraine headaches. TPM was first approved for prescription use in 1996. In various countries it is now approved for adjunctive and monotherapy of partial-onset seizures and for therapy of generalized tonic-clonic seizures of nonfocal origin, for children and adults. For initial monotherapy of new-onset seizures, a target dose of 100 mg/day for adults is recommended. Adjunctive use with enzyme-inducing drugs and use for refractory seizures requires higher dosages, though the optimum dose for most patients does not exceed 400 mg/day. Excretion is primarily renal and TPM is not a significant hepatic enzyme inducer. Although it is usually safe and well-tolerated, adverse effects limit use in about 25% of patients. The most salient of these is cognitive dysfunction, especially problems with expressive speech and verbal memory. Weight loss, renal stones, paresthesias and other central nervous system side effects may occur. Tolerability is improved by low initial doses and slow titration to effect.

Outcome and tolerability of topiramate in brain tumor associated epilepsy

Epilepsy in brain tumor patients is often refractory to pharmacological treatments and can complicate the therapeutic management of these patients. We conducted a prospective, observational study. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate (TPM) in brain tumor associated epilepsy. We studied 47 patients with brain tumors and epilepsy. The entire group was administered AEDs. TPM was the first therapeutic choice in 14 patients, while in the remaining 33 patients previous AEDs were modified and TPM was introduced due to side effects or inefficacy of the first drug. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 48 months (mean 16.5 months). Considering the final follow-up of each patient who assumed TPM for at least 3 months, we observed 45 patients: 25 were seizure free (55.6%), 9 had a reduction of seizure frequency (SF) higher than 50% (20%) and 11 were stable (24.4%). TPM responder rate was 75.6%. Three patients (6.4%) discontinued TPM for severe side effects (1 after 4 months and 2 after 1 month) and 4 (8.5%) had mild and reversible side effects. In the group of patients who had been in therapy with other AEDs prior to entering the study (n = 33), 19 patients had side effects (57.6%). During follow-up, the haematological parameters were in the normative ranges. Tumor-related seizures are difficult to control with AEDs; the precise reasons for this difficulty are not yet clear. Using TPM, we obtained good seizure control with a low incidence of side effects.

Topiramate in add-on therapy: results from an open-label, observational study

An open-label, observational prospective study assessed the effectiveness of topiramate (TPM) as add-on therapy. A total of 450 patients aged 12 and above with a diagnosis of epilepsy and at least one epileptic seizure during the 12-week retrospective baseline were to be documented. After baseline evaluation, topiramate was added. Ninety-five percent of patients had at least one baseline AED, most commonly Carbamazepine (53%) or Valproate (34%). In 5% TPM was started in monotherapy. Topiramate dose titration and target dose was determined by clinical response and side effect profile. Patients were intended to be followed for a total of 1 year which included 6 visits during which seizure frequency, adverse events, weight as well as clinical global impression were recorded. During the 12 weeks retrospective baseline, a median of 2.8 seizures per month were recorded which reduced significantly to 0.7 per month during the complete treatment phase (p < 0.0001). Seventy-two percent of patients had a > or =50% seizure reduction. Ten percent of patients were seizure free during the study. The most commonly reported adverse events were difficulties with memory (4.2%), somnolence (3.6%), and dizziness (2.7%). Overall, topiramate was well tolerated, and only 5% of patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Retention in the study was higher than previously reported during randomized, dose controlled studies and is likely due to individualized doses as well as slower titration used.

Safety and efficacy of anticonvulsants in elderly patients with psychiatric disorders: oxcarbazepine, topiramate and gabapentin

Few controlled studies are available to guide the clinician in treating potentially assaultive elderly individuals with psychiatric disorders. Safety concerns limit the use of benzodiazepines and antipsychotic medications in the elderly individual, making anticonvulsants an attractive alternative. This paper reviews three specific anticonvulsants for this purpose: gabapentin, oxcarbazepine and topiramate, describing safety and efficacy in elderly patients with severe agitation from psychosis or dementia. Gabapentin, renally excreted, with a half-life of 6.5-10.5 h, may cause ataxia. Oxcarbazapine, hepatically reduced, may cause hyponatremia, and topiramate may cause significant cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, these are important medications to consider in the treatment of agitation.

Effect of Topiramate on Plasma Concentrations of Clozapine, Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Quetiapine in Patients With Psychotic Disorders

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of topiramate on the steady-state plasma concentrations of the second-generation antipsychotics--clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine--in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Thirty-eight outpatients on long-term treatment with clozapine (250-500 mg/d, n = 10), olanzapine (10-20 mg/d, n = 12), risperidone (3-6 mg/d, n = 9), or quetiapine (200-600 mg/d, n = 7) received adjunctive topiramate, gradually titrated up to a final dosage of 200 mg/d for 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic assessments were made at baseline and at the end of treatment weeks 4 and 8 at topiramate dosages of 100 and 200 mg/d, respectively.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolite (norclozapine), olanzapine, risperidone and its metabolite (9-hydroxy-risperidone), and quetiapine were not significantly modified during concomitant administration of topiramate. Adjunctive topiramate therapy was well tolerated in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that topiramate, at the dosages recommended for use as a mood stabilizer, does not affect the plasma levels of the new antipsychotics-clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine.

Combination therapy in epilepsy: when and what to use

After being regarded as a last resort for over two decades, the role of combination therapy as a treatment strategy for epilepsy is undergoing re-evaluation. This is a result of the growing appreciation that all seizures cannot be controlled by monotherapy in a substantial proportion of patients, and of the development of a range of modern antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), some of which are better tolerated and less prone to complex pharmacokinetic drug interactions than their older counterparts.Robust evidence to guide clinicians on when and how to combine AEDs is lacking, and current practice recommendations are largely empirical. Monotherapy should remain the treatment of choice for newly diagnosed epilepsy. A combination of two AEDs can be considered after failure, resulting from lack of efficacy, of one or two different monotherapy regimens. A few patients will become seizure-free with a combination of three AEDs, but treatment with a combination of four or more is unlikely to be successful. There is some evidence to support a pharmacomechanistic approach to AED combination. Care should be taken to avoid excessive drug load, which is associated with increased toxicity. Bigger and better randomised, controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal time and way to combine AEDs.