Mendoza L, Begany P, Dyrhonova M, Emritte N, Svobodova X. BIOEQUIVALENCE OF TWO FEXOFENADINE FORMULATIONS IN HEALTHY HUMAN VOLUNTEERS AFTER SINGLE ORAL ADMINISTRATION.
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2007;
151:65-7. [PMID:
17690742 DOI:
10.5507/bp.2007.011]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM
A randomized, two-way, crossover, bioequivalence study was conducted in 25 fasting, healthy, male volunteers to compare two brands of fexofenadine 180 mg tablets, FEXOFENADINE 180 mg Film Tablet (Drogsan A.S., Ankara, Turkey) as test and Telfast 180 mg Tablet (Aventis Pharma, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) as a reference product.
METHOD
One tablet of either formulation was administered after 10 h of overnight fasting. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected during a period of 48 hours. Plasma samples were analysed for fexofenadine by a validated HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-48), AUC(0-alpha), C(max), T(max), K(el), T(1/2), and CL were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles for both formulations and were compared statistically.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not show any significant difference between the two formulations and 90% confidence intervals (CI) fell within the acceptable range, satisfying the bioequivalence criteria of the FDA. Based on these statistical inferences it was concluded that the two brands exhibited comparable pharmacokinetics profiles and that Drogsan's Fexofenadine is equivalent to Telfast of Aventis Pharma, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Collapse