Prevalence of Hypertension in Children with Early-Stage ADPKD

Imaging of Kidney Cysts and Cystic Kidney Diseases in Children: An International Working Group Consensus Statement

Kidney cysts can manifest as focal disease (simple and complex kidney cysts), affect a whole kidney (eg, multicystic dysplastic kidney or cystic dysplasia), or manifest as bilateral cystic disease (eg, autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease [ARPKD] or autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease [ADPKD]). In children, as opposed to adults, a larger proportion of kidney cysts are due to genetic diseases (eg, HNF1B nephropathy, various ciliopathies, and tuberous sclerosis complex), and fewer patients have simple cysts or acquired cystic kidney disease. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide clinical guidance on standardization of imaging tests to evaluate kidney cysts in children. A committee of international experts in pediatric nephrology, pediatric radiology, pediatric US, and adult nephrology prepared systematic literature reviews and formulated recommendations at a consensus meeting. The final statement was endorsed by the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, the European Society of Pediatric Nephrology, and reviewed by the European Reference Network for Rare Kidney Diseases. Main recommendations are as follows: US is the method of choice when assessing pediatric kidney cysts, with selected indications for MRI and contrast-enhanced US. CT should be avoided whenever possible because of ionizing radiation. Renal US yields essential diagnostic information in many cases. In patients with ARPKD or other ciliopathies, abdominal US is needed for diagnosis and screening of portal hypertension. US is usually sufficient for follow-up kidney imaging, but MRI can be valuable for clinical trials in patients with ADPKD or in older children with tuberous sclerosis complex to evaluate both kidney cysts and angiomyolipomas.

Tolvaptan use in children and adolescents with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: rationale and design of a two-part, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

This report describes the rationale and design of a study assessing tolvaptan in children with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Phase A is a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Phase B is a 2-year, open-label extension. The target population is at least 60 children aged 12-17 years, diagnosed by family history and/or genetic criteria and the presence of ≥ 10 renal cysts, each ≥ 0.5 cm on magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects will be allocated into 4 groups: females 15-17 years; females 12-14 years; males 15-17 years; and males 12-14 years. Up to 40 subjects aged 4-11 years may also enroll, provided they meet the entry criteria. Weight-adjusted tolvaptan doses, titrated once to achieve a tolerated maintenance dose, and matching placebo will be administered twice-daily. Assessments include spot urine osmolality and specific gravity (co-primary endpoints), height-adjusted total kidney volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate, pharmacodynamic parameters (urine volume, fluid intake and fluid balance, serum sodium, serum creatinine, free water clearance), pharmacokinetic parameters, safety (aquaretic adverse events, changes from baseline in creatinine, vital signs, laboratory values including liver function tests), and generic pediatric quality of life assessments.Conclusion: This will be the first clinical study to evaluate tolvaptan in pediatric ADPKD. What is Known: • Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic disorder causing the development of cysts that impede kidney function over time and eventually induce renal failure • There are few data on the effects of tolvaptan, the only treatment approved for adults to slow disease progression, in pediatric ADPKD patients with early-stage disease What is New: • A phase 3, placebo-controlled study is evaluating tolvaptan over 3 years in children and adolescents with ADPKD • This study is designed to account for challenges of tolvaptan dosing and outcome assessment specific to the pediatric population.

Central blood pressure and measures of early vascular disease in children with ADPKD

BACKGROUND

There is growing recognition of hypertension in a significant proportion of children with ADPKD. In this study, we assessed blood pressure and cardiovascular status in children with ADPKD.

METHODS

A prospective two-centre observational study of children (< 18 years) with ADPKD was compared against age- and BMI-matched healthy controls. Children underwent peripheral BP (pBP) measured using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and auscultation, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), non-invasive central BP (cBP) measurement, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWVcf) measured using applanation tonometry and measurement of indexed left ventricular mass (LVMI) using echocardiography. This study received independent ethical approval.

RESULTS

Forty-seven children with ADPKD and 49 healthy controls were recruited (median age 11 years vs. 12 years). Children with ADPKD had significantly higher systolic pBP (mean 112 ± 13.5 mmHg vs. 104 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.001), higher systolic cBP (mean 97 ± 12.8 mmHg vs. 87 ± 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and lower pulse pressure amplification ratio (1.59 ± 0.2 vs. 1.67 ± 0.1, p = 0.04) compared to healthy children. Thirty-five percent of children with ADPKD showed a lack of appropriate nocturnal dipping on 24-h ABPM. There was no difference in PWVcf between children with ADPKD and healthy children (mean 5.74 ± 1 m/s vs. 5.57 ± 0.9 m/s, p = 0.46). Those with ADPKD had a significantly higher LVMI (mean 30.4 ± 6.6 g/m^2.7 vs. 26.2 ± 6.2 g/m^2.7, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight the high prevalence of hypertension in children with ADPKD, also demonstrating early cardiovascular dysfunction with increased LVMI and reduced PP amplification despite preserved PWVcf, when compared with healthy peers. These early cardiovascular abnormalities are likely to be amenable to antihypertensive therapy, reinforcing the need for routine screening of children with ADPKD.

Polycystic kidney disease

Cystic kidneys are common causes of end-stage renal disease, both in children and in adults. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) are cilia-related disorders and the two main forms of monogenic cystic kidney diseases. ADPKD is a common disease that mostly presents in adults, whereas ARPKD is a rarer and often more severe form of polycystic kidney disease (PKD) that usually presents perinatally or in early childhood. Cell biological and clinical research approaches have expanded our knowledge of the pathogenesis of ADPKD and ARPKD and revealed some mechanistic overlap between them. A reduced 'dosage' of PKD proteins is thought to disturb cell homeostasis and converging signalling pathways, such as Ca²⁺, cAMP, mechanistic target of rapamycin, WNT, vascular endothelial growth factor and Hippo signalling, and could explain the more severe clinical course in some patients with PKD. Genetic diagnosis might benefit families and improve the clinical management of patients, which might be enhanced even further with emerging therapeutic options. However, many important questions about the pathogenesis of PKD remain. In this Primer, we provide an overview of the current knowledge of PKD and its treatment.

Unmet needs and challenges for follow-up and treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the paediatric perspective

Awareness is growing that the clinical course of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) already begins in childhood, with a broad range of both symptomatic and asymptomatic features. Knowing that parenchymal destruction with cyst formation and growth starts early in life, it seems reasonable to assume that early intervention may yield the best chances for preserving renal outcome. Interventions may involve lifestyle modifications, hypertension control and the use of disease-modifying treatments once these become available for the paediatric population with an acceptable risk and side-effect profile. Until then, screening of at-risk children is controversial and not generally recommended since this might cause psychosocial and financial harm. Also, the clinical and research communities are facing important questions as to the nature of potential interventions and their optimal indications and timing. Indeed, challenges include the identification and validation of indicators, both measuring and predicting disease progression from childhood, and the discrimination of slow from rapid progressors in the paediatric population. This discrimination will improve both the cost-effectiveness and benefit-to-risk ratio of therapies. Furthermore, we will need to define outcome measures, and to evaluate the possibility of a potential therapeutic window of opportunity in childhood. The recently established international register ADPedKD will help in elucidating these questions. In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on paediatric ADPKD as a future therapeutic target population and its unmet challenges.