51
|
Ghildayal N. Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis A vaccination in a developed and developing country. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2020; 32:1175-1199. [PMID: 31566514 DOI: 10.1108/ijhcqa-05-2019-0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hepatitis A is a prevalent disease that is largely preventable by vaccine usage. The vaccine for this illness is highly underused in most regions. In an attempt to find the strategies that are most beneficial in regard to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost in current environments, the purpose of this paper is to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to investigate vaccination strategies in a more economically developed country (MEDC), generally known as a "developed" area: the USA, and a less economically developed country (LEDC), generally known as a "developing" area: the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This study used a dynamic transmission model for comparative effectiveness analyses. The model ran two different scenarios. The two regions studied have different policies and strategies for Hepatitis A vaccination currently, and also used different strategies in 2009. In the USA, a universal vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which it was removed. In Rio de Janeiro, a no vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which a universal vaccination policy was effected. FINDINGS The comparison of resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values to accepted threshold values showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro as compared to no vaccination. When episode and vaccination costs and vaccination efficacy were varied, this still remained true. Universal vaccination was found to result in lower incidence of Hepatitis A in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro. Over the twenty-year time horizon, universal vaccination is projected to prevent 506,945 cases of symptomatic Hepatitis A in the USA and 42,318 cases of Hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro. Other benefits include a projected increase in cumulative QALYs through the use of universal vaccination. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This analysis showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective as compared to no vaccination, and portions of the study's approach had not previously been applied in tandem to investigate Hepatitis A interventions. The results may help foster higher compliance rates for Hepatitis A vaccination and even greater per-person economic benefits of universal vaccination, particularly in the USA. The purpose of this study is also to encourage elevated levels of surveillance on age of infection in developing regions and consistent reevaluation utilizing dynamic transmission models in both the USA and Brazil, as well as other rapidly developing regions, in order to prevent future epidemics and costs associated with the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Ghildayal
- University of Minnesota Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Pritchard MG, Murphy J, Cheng L, Janarthanan R, Judge A, Leal J. Enhanced recovery following hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e032204. [PMID: 31948987 PMCID: PMC7044879 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways following total hip and knee arthroplasties. Secondary objectives were to report on quality of studies and identify research gaps for future work. DESIGN Systematic review of cost-utility analyses. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database and EconLit, January 2000 to August 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA English-language peer-reviewed cost-utility analyses of enhanced recovery pathways, or components of one, compared with usual care, in patients having total hip or knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extracted by three reviewers with disagreements resolved by a fourth. Study quality assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list, the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic decision models tools; for trial-based studies the Cochrane Collaboration's tool to assess risk of bias. No quantitative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS We identified 17 studies: five trial-based and 12 model-based studies. Two analyses evaluated entire enhanced recovery pathways and reported them to be cost-effective compared with usual care. Ten pathway components were more effective and cost-saving compared with usual care, three were cost-effective, and two were not cost-effective. We had concerns around risk of bias for all included studies, particularly regarding the short time horizon of the trials and lack of reporting of model validation. CONCLUSIONS Consistent results supported enhanced recovery pathways as a whole, prophylactic systemic antibiotics, antibiotic-impregnated cement and conventional ventilation for infection prevention. No other interventions were subject of more than one study. We found ample scope for future cost-effectiveness studies, particularly analyses of entire recovery pathways and comparison of incremental changes within pathways. A key limitation is that standard practices have changed over the period covered by the included studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017059473.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Pritchard
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jacqueline Murphy
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine - Barts and the London, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lok Cheng
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | - Roshni Janarthanan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Judge
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Lee D, Lee YR, Oh IH. Cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation programs for hospitalized patients: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2019; 20:1409-1424. [PMID: 31452084 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01105-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review examined the characteristics of published cost-effectiveness analyses of inpatient smoking cessation programs and assessed the methodological quality of the selected studies, to provide policymakers with economic evidence for this type of program. METHODS A literature search was undertaken using a relevant database by three investigators. Only full economic evaluations with results in the form of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were included. Costs were adjusted to 2016 US dollars using the Gross Domestic Product deflator and purchasing power parities. The British Medical Journal checklist was utilized to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS Nine articles were ultimately selected. The inpatient smoking cessation programs appeared to be a highly cost-effective intervention according to the recommended cost-effectiveness thresholds by the World Health Organization or individual studies. The highest ICERs among the selected studies were $5593 per additional quit, $10,550 per life year gained, and $5680 per quality-adjusted life year gained. CONCLUSIONS This study provides robust evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation programs for hospitalized patients. In addition, the results indicated that the degree of cost-effectiveness of the inpatient smoking cessation program might not be related to either the components of the program or methodological variations in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Policymakers should provide hospitals with resources and strong incentives to promote wider implementation of the smoking cessation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghoon Lee
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ye-Rin Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Hwan Oh
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Abstract
Objectives: Theoretically, willingness-to-pay (WTP) for quality-adjusted life years (QALY) can vary depending on social and personal preferences and on ex-ante and ex-post settings. However, empirical investigations into the theoretical differences are lacking. In Japan, setting the threshold has been controversial since a pilot project to implement health technology assessments (HTA) launched in 2016. The study aim is to estimate WTP values for one additional QALY from different perspectives, health statuses, and contexts to confirm the difficulty in setting a uniform price threshold using WTP. Methods: More than 1,000 respondents representing a cross-section of the Japanese population answered each of nine questionnaire decks in an online panel. WTP values were estimated on three different perspectives (personal, social, and socially inclusive) and on two contexts (ex-ante and ex-post). This study primarily used the non-parametric spike model based on double-bounded dichotomous choice (DBDC) settings to obtain the conditional WTP values. Results: WTP per QALY was higher in the severe health status than in the moderate health status from all perspectives. Respondents from the socially inclusive perspective estimated the highest WTP value for a new drug. Respondents were also asked about life-threatening diseases in ex-post and ex-ante. The WTP value in ex-ante was higher than in ex-post, and demographic factors affecting the WTP were different in both situations. The various WTP values were obtained from these surveys. Limitations: The analysis was based on data collected from an internet panel, which could be biased. There is also a risk that respondents answered the questionnaire differently if asked in everyday situations. Conclusion: Use of a uniform price threshold may not be appropriate in policy settings, because it may not reflect diverse preferences based on different situations, such as disease type and severity. Setting a price threshold as Japan institutes an HTA system requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rei Goto
- Keio University , Yokohama , Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Santos AS, Guerra-Junior AA, Noronha KVMDS, Andrade MV, Ruas CM. The Price of Substitute Technologies. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 20:154-158. [PMID: 31561148 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Only a small share of new drugs is truly innovative; 85% to 90% of all new health technologies have little or no advantage over existing therapeutic alternatives. Health economic evaluations can be used to induce acceptable prices for new technologies through threshold pricing. OBJECTIVE This work discusses a cost-effectiveness threshold (λ) to be applied to the price regulation of substitute technologies. METHODS Considering that substitute technologies add only small marginal benefits in terms of innovation or ethical considerations to the system, it does not make sense to allow a loss of efficiency to list them. It has been postulated that the threshold calculated from opportunity costs (κ) represents its maximum possible value and that there must be a threshold (β) that maximizes consumer surplus. For a substitute technology to be listed, the cost of treatment associated with it must be lower than the cost of treatment of the incumbent technology added to the difference in effectiveness priced at the threshold. RESULTS There is no reason for us to believe that the oligopolistic pharmaceutical market is currently charging prices at the cost of production. That way, the cost-effectiveness ratio of the incumbent technology, when lower than κ, is shown through a deductive process to be a plausible estimate for λ that fulfills the objective of maximizing consumer benefit, granting producers a part of the combined surplus to stimulate research and development; that is, it would be between β and κ. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the price of substitute technologies should be limited by the cost-effectiveness ratio of the incumbent technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Soares Santos
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Department of Economical Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
| | - Augusto Afonso Guerra-Junior
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; SUS Collaborating Centre for Technology Assessment and Excelence Health Excellence, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Mônica Viegas Andrade
- Department of Economical Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Cristina Mariano Ruas
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Raymakers AJN, Regier DA, Peacock SJ. Health-related quality of life in oncology drug reimbursement submissions in Canada: A review of submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review. Cancer 2019; 126:148-155. [PMID: 31544234 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Canada, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) evaluates and makes recommendations for the reimbursement of cancer drugs. One component of its recommendation is based on an economic evaluation, which typically takes the form of a cost-utility analysis. A cost-utility analysis measures the effects of competing therapies with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The data for this calculation typically come from generic, preference-based measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The objective of this review is to determine the frequency at which HRQOL data are collected alongside cancer drug trials and used in the cost-utility analysis submitted to the CADTH pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR). METHODS Submissions between 2015 and 2018 to pCODR, the group charged with evaluating cancer drug submissions at CADTH, were reviewed. All pCODR submissions, either in progress or completed, were publicly available online. The search was restricted to completed evaluations. RESULTS Forty-three submissions met the inclusion criteria. The incremental gain in QALYs in most submissions from the new technology was small (median incremental gain, 0.86; interquartile range, 0.6-1.39). More than half of the submissions (56%) did not include original data on HRQOL, with most relying on previous studies of variable relevance and quality. Re-analyses by pCODR based on concerns over HRQOL data used in the submitted model were common (52%). CONCLUSIONS Drug manufacturers do not consistently collect data on HRQOL alongside clinical trials and instead rely on evidence generated in previous studies to inform cost-utility analyses. These findings should induce manufacturers to collect original HRQOL data that are simultaneously relevant to patients and decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J N Raymakers
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stuart J Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Verbeek JGE, Atema V, Mewes JC, van Leeuwen M, Oldenburg HSA, van Beurden M, Hunter MS, van Harten WH, Aaronson NK, Retèl VP. Cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for breast cancer survivors with treatment-induced menopausal symptoms. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 178:573-585. [PMID: 31451978 PMCID: PMC6817759 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05410-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), with and without therapist support, is effective in reducing treatment-induced menopausal symptoms and perceived impact of hot flushes and night sweats (HF/NS) in breast cancer survivors. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of both iCBT formats compared to a waiting list control group from the Dutch healthcare perspective. Methods A Markov model was constructed with a 5-year time horizon. Costs and health outcomes were measured alongside a randomized controlled clinical trial and included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), overall levels of menopausal symptoms, and perceived impact of HF/NS. Uncertainty was examined using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses, together with a scenario analysis incorporating a different perspective. Results iCBT was slightly more expensive than the waiting list control, but also more effective, resulting in incremental cost-utility ratios of €23,331/QALY and €11,277/QALY for the guided and self-managed formats, respectively. A significant reduction in overall levels of menopausal symptoms or perceived impact of HF/NS resulted in incremental costs between €1460 and €1525 for the guided and €500–€753 for the self-managed format. The estimated annual budget impact for the Netherlands was €192,990 for the guided and €74,592 for the self-managed format. Conclusion Based on the current trial data, the results indicate that both guided and self-managed iCBT are cost-effective with a willingness-to-pay threshold of well below €30,000/QALY. Additionally, self-managed iCBT is the most cost-effective strategy and has a lower impact on healthcare budgets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost G E Verbeek
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Unveristy of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Atema
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Myra S Hunter
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Unveristy of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Unveristy of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Finkelstein EA, Krishnan A, Doble B. Beyond cost-effectiveness: A five-step framework for appraising the value of health technologies in Asia-Pacific. Int J Health Plann Manage 2019; 35:397-408. [PMID: 31290187 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Given resource constraints and the potential for increasingly high-cost, cost-effective medicines to become available, policymakers require strategies that go beyond cost-effectiveness when making resource allocation decisions. This manuscript presents a five-step framework that complements traditional health technology assessment (HTA) guidance documents that policymakers in Asia-Pacific and elsewhere may consider when setting up HTA guidelines and/or evaluating whether or not to subsidize a medicine or other health innovations. The framework recommends that subsidy decisions be based on five criteria: the relative burden of the condition as compared with other conditions (step 1), comparative and cost-effectiveness of the medicine (steps 2 and 3), the short-term impact on the budget (step 4), and other considerations including patient and societal preferences (step 5). Our approach, which is a complement to traditional HTA guidance documents, is not prescriptive but provides an evidence-based framework that HTA agencies in Asia-Pacific can follow as they aim to deliver value-based medicines to their constituents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Finkelstein
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Anirudh Krishnan
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Brett Doble
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Singh S, Cheek JA, Babl FE, Hoch JS. Review article: A primer for clinical researchers in the emergency department: Part X. Understanding economic evaluation alongside emergency medicine research. Emerg Med Australas 2019; 31:710-714. [PMID: 31237083 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In this series we address research topics in emergency medicine. While traditionally there was an almost exclusive focus on the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions in emergency research, analysis of the costs and the societal impact of different approaches and pathways have become increasingly important. In this paper we will address what health economics means and discuss the different types and key features of economic evaluation relevant for clinical researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Singh
- Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - John A Cheek
- Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Franz E Babl
- Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffrey S Hoch
- Center for Heathcare Policy and Research, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.,Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Antonides CFJ, Cohen DJ, Osnabrugge RLJ. Statistical primer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 54:209-213. [PMID: 29726940 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of new treatment strategies are increasingly reported. This can be a part of a clinical trial or as a separate study. Governments and healthcare payers frequently require a CEA to decide whether a new treatment strategy will be reimbursed. CEA is a framework to assess the effectiveness and costs of a new treatment strategy (e.g. a drug or intervention) when compared with a reference strategy. Effectiveness is often measured in life-years or quality-adjusted life-years, whereas costs consist of direct costs (the costs of the treatment), induced costs (downstream costs and cost offsets) and indirect costs. In this statistical primer, the rationale for assessing the economic consequences of new therapies is explained, followed by the fundamental concepts of CEAs, the different types of CEAs and an introduction to interpretation of CEAs. Finally, a real-world example of a CEA is discussed, comparing cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David J Cohen
- Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruben L J Osnabrugge
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Borba HHL, Rochau U, Wiens A, Sroczynski G, Siebert U, Ferreira VL, Minowa E, Pontarolo R. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Triple Therapy With Telaprevir and Boceprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C: A Decision Analysis From the Brazilian Public Health System Perspective. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 20:95-102. [PMID: 31108456 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Because of the lack of evidence regarding long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first-generation direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment in Brazil, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing standard dual therapy (peginterferon plus ribavirin [pegIFN/RBV]), boceprevir, and telaprevir for CHC patients. METHODS We developed a state-transition Markov model simulating the progression of CHC. Long-term outcomes included remaining life expectancy in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Short-term outcomes included sustained virological response rates (SVR). Direct medical costs were obtained from Brazilian databases. A lifelong time horizon was considered and a 5% annual discount rate was applied for costs and clinical outcomes. A willingness-to-pay threshold of approximately $20 000 per QALY was used. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses. RESULTS For short- and long-term scenarios, therapy with boceprevir was dominated by telaprevir, which was more effective than standard dual therapy (75.0% vs 40.4% SVR rate, 13.47 vs 12.59 LYs, and 9.74 vs 8.49 QALYs, respectively) and was also more expensive ($15 742 vs $5413). The corresponding ICERs were $29 854/SVR, $11 803/LY, and $8277/QALY. Based on our model, triple therapy with telaprevir was the most cost-effective treatment for the Brazilian health system. Despite a lack of data regarding the Brazilian population, we incorporated as many applicable parameters as possible. CONCLUSIONS Telaprevir is more effective and cost-effective than boceprevir. Our model may be applied for other settings with a few adjustments in the input parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena H L Borba
- Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Ursula Rochau
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Astrid Wiens
- Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; Division of Health Technology Assessment, ONCOTYROL-Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria; Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Eimy Minowa
- Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Roberto Pontarolo
- Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Van der Ploeg CPB, Blom M, Bredius RGM, van der Burg M, Schielen PCJI, Verkerk PH, Van den Akker-van Marle ME. Cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency. Eur J Pediatr 2019; 178:721-729. [PMID: 30805731 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03346-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a condition that often results in severe infections and death at young age. Early detection shortly after birth, followed by treatment before infections occur, largely increases the chances of survival. As the incidence of SCID is low, assessing cost-effectiveness of adding screening for SCID to the newborn screening program is relevant for decision making. Lifetime costs and effects of newborn screening for SCID were compared to a situation without screening in the Netherlands in a decision analysis model. Model parameters were based on literature and expert opinions. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Due to earlier detection, the number of deaths due to SCID per 100,000 children was assessed to decrease from 0.57 to 0.23 and a number of 11.7 quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained was expected. Total yearly healthcare costs, including costs of screening, diagnostics, and treatment, were €390,800 higher in a situation with screening compared to a situation without screening, resulting in a cost-utility ratio of €33,400 per QALY gained.Conclusion: Newborn screening for SCID might be cost-effective. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimate. Pilot screening projects are warranted to obtain more accurate estimates for the European situation. What is Known: • Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a condition that often results in severe infections and death at a young age. • As the incidence of SCID is low, assessing cost-effectiveness of adding screening for SCID to the newborn screening program is needed. What is New: • Newborn screening for SCID is expected to reduce mortality from 0.57 to 0.23 per 100,000 children at additional healthcare costs of €390,800. The cost-utility ratio is €33,400 per QALY gained. • Due to large uncertainty around cost-effectiveness estimates, pilot screening projects are warranted for Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maartje Blom
- Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert G M Bredius
- Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam van der Burg
- Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter C J I Schielen
- RIVM, Department Biologicals, Screening and Innovation, PO box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Paul H Verkerk
- TNO - Child Health, PO box 3005, 2301 DA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Yu XQ, Yang SG, Li H, Xie Y, Li JS, Zhang P. Preliminary Study to Evaluate Three Different Treatments on Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Based on Markov Model. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE : ECAM 2019; 2019:6478926. [PMID: 31118965 PMCID: PMC6500607 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6478926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluates the costs and utilities of different treatment strategies for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients based on Markov model and provides guidance for clinical decision and health policy making. Patients with stable COPD from four subcenters had been investigated. A Markov model with three states, namely, GOLD 1-2, GOLD 3-4, and death, was built using TreeAge Pro 2011 software. Cost-utility ratio (CUR) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) from forty Markov circles were applied to measuring the economics evaluation of three different treatments. A total of 236 stable COPD patients were randomly assigned into three groups, Western medicine group (79 cases), traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) group (79 cases), and combined group (78 cases). The results of Markov cohort simulation showed that the accumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the three above groups per 100 000 people in 40 years were 1 702 773, 1 616 797, and 1 709 668 years, respectively, and the accumulative costs were 13 582 138 466, 1 207 904 113, and 14 656 607 371 Yuan, respectively. The CURs of the three groups were 87 235, 74 602, and 87 223 Yuan/QALY, respectively. ICURs of combined group were 8 707 and 41 705 Yuan as against Western medicine group and TCM group, respectively. Therefore, combined treatment has a lower cost, higher health output, and more socioeconomic benefits in the long run. Markov model is recommended to conduct health economics evaluation of different treatments for COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-qing Yu
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Ren-min Road 19, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Respiratory Disease Diagnosis and Treatment & Chinese Medicine Development of Henan Province, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine for Respiratory Disease, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
| | - Shu-guang Yang
- Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Jin-shui East Road 156, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
| | - Han Li
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Ren-min Road 19, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Yang Xie
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Ren-min Road 19, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Respiratory Disease Diagnosis and Treatment & Chinese Medicine Development of Henan Province, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine for Respiratory Disease, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
| | - Jian-sheng Li
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Ren-min Road 19, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Respiratory Disease Diagnosis and Treatment & Chinese Medicine Development of Henan Province, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine for Respiratory Disease, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
| | - Pan Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Third People's Hospital of Henan Province, Fu-niu Road 198, Zhengzhou, Henan 450006, China
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Faruque F, Noh H, Hussain A, Neuberger E, Onukwugha E. Economic Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cancer Drugs with Clinically Relevant Drug-Gene Associations: A Systematic Literature Review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019; 25:260-271. [PMID: 30698084 PMCID: PMC7397474 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenetic testing can provide predictive insights about the efficacy and safety of drugs used in cancer treatment. Although many drug-gene associations have been reported in the literature, the strength of evidence supporting each association can vary significantly. Even among the subgroup of drugs classified by the PharmGKB database to have a high or moderate level of evidence, there is limited information regarding the economic value of pharmacogenetic testing. OBJECTIVES To: (a) summarize the available pharmacoeconomic evidence assessing the value of pharmacogenetic testing for cancer drugs with clinically relevant drug-gene associations; (b) determine the quality of the studies that contain this evidence; and (c) discuss the quality of this evidence with respect to the level of evidence of the drug-gene associations. METHODS The PharmGKB database was used to identify cancer drugs with clinically relevant drug-gene associations graded high (1A, 1B) or moderate (2A, 2B). A systematic literature review was conducted using these drugs. Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to identify cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost-minimization studies comparing pharmacogenetic testing to an alternative. Cost and effect values from every relevant comparison within the studies were extracted, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was either extracted or calculated for each comparison. Quality assessment was conducted for each study using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the data. RESULTS The search yielded 2,191 citations, of which 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pharmacoeconomic studies were available for the following drugs from the PharmGKB database: fluoropyrimidine, 6-mercaptopurine, irinotecan, carboplatin, cisplatin, erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, panitumumab, and trastuzumab. The studies were conducted in Asia, Europe, Canada, the United States, and Mexico and reported cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, and cost-minimization outcomes. The mean QHES score was 80 (SD = 22) for the studies of drug-gene pairs with high (1A, 1B) and moderate (2A, 2B) levels of evidence (1A = 82, 1B = 93, 2A = 71, and 2B = 74). There was variation across studies in terms of reporting. 109 relevant comparisons were identified within the studies. Of those that reported cost per life-year or cost per quality-adjusted life-year (n = 58 comparisons), pharmacogenetic testing was dominant in 21% overall and 42%, 21%, 17%, and 5% of the comparisons in Asia, Europe, Canada, and the United States, respectively. Variability was observed in the ICER values regardless of geographic region or drug. Pharmacogenetic testing was cost saving in 17 of 19 cost-minimization comparisons and was favored most frequently when compared with genetically indiscriminate strategies containing the drug of interest. CONCLUSIONS There was mixed evidence regarding the value of pharmacogenetic testing to guide cancer treatment. For future pharmacogenomic-related economic studies, we recommend prioritizing clinically relevant drug-gene associations and greater adherence to available best practice guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation studies. DISCLOSURES No outside funding supported this review. Part of Hussain's research time was supported by a Merit Review Award (I01 BX000545), Medical Research Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Hussain also reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, and France Foundation, outside the submitted work. Onukwugha reports grants from Pfizer and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, along with advisory board fees from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. Faruque, Neuberger, and Noh have nothing to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahim Faruque
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
| | - Heejung Noh
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
| | - Arif Hussain
- Baltimore VA Medical Center and University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | | | - Eberechukwu Onukwugha
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Kristensen FB, Husereau D, Huić M, Drummond M, Berger ML, Bond K, Augustovski F, Booth A, Bridges JFP, Grimshaw J, IJzerman MJ, Jonsson E, Ollendorf DA, Rüther A, Siebert U, Sharma J, Wailoo A. Identifying the Need for Good Practices in Health Technology Assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:13-20. [PMID: 30661627 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The systematic use of evidence to inform healthcare decisions, particularly health technology assessment (HTA), has gained increased recognition. HTA has become a standard policy tool for informing decision makers who must manage the entry and use of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and other technologies (including complex interventions) within health systems, for example, through reimbursement and pricing. Despite increasing attention to HTA activities, there has been no attempt to comprehensively synthesize good practices or emerging good practices to support population-based decision-making in recent years. After the identification of some good practices through the release of the ISPOR Guidelines Index in 2013, the ISPOR HTA Council identified a need to more thoroughly review existing guidance. The purpose of this effort was to create a basis for capacity building, education, and improved consistency in approaches to HTA-informed decision-making. Our findings suggest that although many good practices have been developed in areas of assessment and some other key aspects of defining HTA processes, there are also many areas where good practices are lacking. This includes good practices in defining the organizational aspects of HTA, the use of deliberative processes, and measuring the impact of HTA. The extent to which these good practices are used and applied by HTA bodies is beyond the scope of this report, but may be of interest to future researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Don Husereau
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| | - Mirjana Huić
- Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - Kenneth Bond
- Patient Engagement, Ethics and International Affairs, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Federico Augustovski
- Economic Evaluations and HTA Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Andrew Booth
- ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John F P Bridges
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Cochrane Canada and Professor of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Technology & Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Egon Jonsson
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alric Rüther
- International Affairs, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; Division of Health Technology Assessment, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria; Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jitendar Sharma
- AP MedTech Zone & Advisor (Health), Department of Health & Family Welfare, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Allan Wailoo
- ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; NICE Decision Support Unit, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Richter AK, Klimek L, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Renz H, Wehrmann W, Werfel T, Hamelmann E, Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Wasem J, Biermann-Stallwitz J. Impact of increasing treatment rates on cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in respiratory allergy: a decision analytic modelling approach. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2018; 19:1229-1242. [PMID: 29574666 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0970-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specific immunotherapy is the only causal treatment in respiratory allergy. Due to high treatment cost and possible severe side effects subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is not indicated in all patients. Nevertheless, reported treatment rates seem to be low. This study aims to analyze the effects of increasing treatment rates of SCIT in respiratory allergy in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). METHODS A state-transition Markov model simulates the course of disease of patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma and both diseases over 10 years including a symptom-free state and death. Treatment comprises symptomatic pharmacotherapy alone or combined with SCIT. The model compares two strategies of increased and status quo treatment rates. Transition probabilities are based on routine data. Costs are calculated from the societal perspective applying German unit costs to literature-derived resource consumption. QALYs are determined by translating the mean change in non-preference-based quality of life scores to a change in utility. Key parameters are subjected to deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Increasing treatment rates is a cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3484€/QALY compared to the status quo. The most influential parameters are SCIT discontinuation rates, treatment effects on the transition probabilities and cost of SCIT. Across all parameter variations, the best case leads to dominance of increased treatment rates while the worst case ICER is 34,315€/QALY. Excluding indirect cost leads to a twofold increase in the ICER. CONCLUSIONS Measures to increase SCIT initiation rates should be implemented and also address improving adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kathrin Richter
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Centre for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Hans F Merk
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, University Clinic RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Harald Renz
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, Molecular Diagnostics, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wehrmann
- Dermatological Clinic Prof. Wehrmann, Dr. Rödder-Wehrmann and colleagues, Münster, Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research, Dept of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Children's Center Bethel, Protestant Hospital Bielefeld and Allergy Center Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MGH-ITA, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Jürgen Wasem
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany
| | - Janine Biermann-Stallwitz
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Organ Preservation Methods for Deceased Donor Kidneys at High Risk for Delayed Graft Function in Brazil. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3121-3127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
68
|
Chong HY, Allotey PA, Chaiyakunapruk N. Current landscape of personalized medicine adoption and implementation in Southeast Asia. BMC Med Genomics 2018; 11:94. [PMID: 30367635 PMCID: PMC6203971 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-018-0420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence of personalized medicine (PM) has raised some tensions in healthcare systems. PM is expensive and health budgets are constrained - efficient healthcare delivery is therefore critical. Notwithstanding the cost, many countries have started to adopt this novel technology, including resource-limited Southeast Asia (SEA) countries. This study aimed to describe the status of PM adoption in SEA, highlight the challenges and to propose strategies for future development. METHODS The study included scoping review and key stakeholder interviews in four focus countries - Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. The current landscape of PM adoption was evaluated based on an assessment framework of six key themes - healthcare system, governance, access, awareness, implementation, and data. Six PM programs were evaluated for their financing and implementation mechanisms. RESULTS The findings revealed SEA has progressed in adopting PM especially Singapore and Thailand. A regional pharmacogenomics research network has been established. However, PM policies and programs vary significantly. As most PM programs are champion-driven and the available funding is limited, the current PM distribution has the potential to widen existing health disparities. Low PM awareness in the society and the absence of political support with financial investment are fundamental barriers. There is a clear need to broaden opportunities for critical discourse about PM especially for policymakers. Multi-stakeholder, multi-country strategies need to be prioritized in order to leverage resources and expertise. CONCLUSIONS Adopting PM remains in its infancy in SEA. To achieve an effective PM adoption, it is imperative to balance equity issues across diverse populations while improving efficiency in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huey Yi Chong
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Pascale A. Allotey
- United Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
- Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research (CPOR), Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
- Asian Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Population, Implementation and Clinical Outcomes (PICO), Global Asia in the 21st Century (GA21) Platform, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Value assessment of disease-modifying therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: HTA evidence from seven OECD countries. Health Policy 2018; 123:118-129. [PMID: 30227974 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
This study systematically compares HTA recommendations on a number of disease-modifying therapies for patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. We analysed publicly available HTA reports for nine medicine-indication pairs across seven OECD countries using a methodological framework enabling systematic analysis of HTA recommendations. The analysis was conducted based on a number of value dimensions, including clinical and economic variables, as well as several other dimensions of value beyond cost-effectiveness. The material was qualitatively and quantitatively coded following the different stages of HTA decision-making process. Fifty-seven medicine-indication pairs were assessed across the study countries. Of those, eight medicine indication-pairs reported diverging HTA recommendations. Although HTA recommendations were based on the same evidence submitted in most cases, significant variations were identified in interpretation and acceptance of evidence resulting in different uncertainties raised and different ways of addressing them. Uncertainties arose both in terms of the clinical and the economic evidence, including the design of key trials or the data quality in economic models. Beyond costs and effects, additional dimensions of value had an impact in the direction of recommendations, however with different magnitude across countries. We show that there is heterogeneity across countries in HTA for evaluating DMTs for RRMS with a lack of standardised methods in evaluating clinical and economic evidence and the use of social value judgments to inform decision-making.
Collapse
|
70
|
Sandmann FG, Mostardt S, Lhachimi SK, Gerber-Grote A. The efficiency-frontier approach for health economic evaluation versus cost-effectiveness thresholds and internal reference pricing: combining the best of both worlds? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2018; 18:475-486. [DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1497976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frank G. Sandmann
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Mostardt
- Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan K. Lhachimi
- Research Group Evidence-Based Public Health, Leibniz-Institute for Epidemiology and Prevention Research (BIPS), Bremen, Germany
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing, Health Sciences Bremen, University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Andreas Gerber-Grote
- School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Thokala P, Ochalek J, Leech AA, Tong T. Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2018; 36:509-522. [PMID: 29427072 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0606-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness (CE) thresholds are being discussed more frequently and there have been many new developments in this area; however, there is a lack of understanding about what thresholds mean and their implications. This paper provides an overview of the CE threshold literature. First, the meaning of a CE threshold and the key assumptions involved (perfect divisibility, marginal increments in budget, etc.) are highlighted using a hypothetical example, and the use of historic/heuristic estimates of the threshold is noted along with their limitations. Recent endeavours to estimate the empirical value of the thresholds, both from the supply side and the demand side, are then presented. The impact on CE thresholds of future directions for the field, such as thresholds across sectors and the incorporation of multiple criteria beyond quality-adjusted life-years as a measure of 'value', are highlighted. Finally, a number of common issues and misconceptions associated with CE thresholds are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Thokala
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Jessica Ochalek
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Ashley A Leech
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Thaison Tong
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Sandmann FG, Robotham JV, Deeny SR, Edmunds WJ, Jit M. Estimating the opportunity costs of bed-days. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2018; 27:592-605. [PMID: 29105894 PMCID: PMC5900745 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Opportunity costs of bed-days are fundamental to understanding the value of healthcare systems. They greatly influence burden of disease estimations and economic evaluations involving stays in healthcare facilities. However, different estimation techniques employ assumptions that differ crucially in whether to consider the value of the second-best alternative use forgone, of any available alternative use, or the value of the actually chosen alternative. Informed by economic theory, this paper provides a taxonomic framework of methodologies for estimating the opportunity costs of resources. This taxonomy is then applied to bed-days by classifying existing approaches accordingly. We highlight differences in valuation between approaches and the perspective adopted, and we use our framework to appraise the assumptions and biases underlying the standard approaches that have been widely adopted mostly unquestioned in the past, such as the conventional use of reference costs and administrative accounting data. Drawing on these findings, we present a novel approach for estimating the opportunity costs of bed-days in terms of health forgone for the second-best patient, but expressed monetarily. This alternative approach effectively re-connects to the concept of choice and explicitly considers net benefits. It is broadly applicable across settings and for other resources besides bed-days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank G. Sandmann
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Infectious Disease EpidemiologyLondonUK
- Public Health EnglandModelling and Economics UnitLondonUK
| | | | - Sarah R. Deeny
- Public Health EnglandModelling and Economics UnitLondonUK
- The Health FoundationLondonUK
| | - W. John Edmunds
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Infectious Disease EpidemiologyLondonUK
| | - Mark Jit
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Infectious Disease EpidemiologyLondonUK
- Public Health EnglandModelling and Economics UnitLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Santos AS, Guerra-Junior AA, Godman B, Morton A, Ruas CM. Cost-effectiveness thresholds: methods for setting and examples from around the world. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2018; 18:277-288. [PMID: 29468951 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1443810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) are used to judge if an intervention represents sufficient value for money to merit adoption in healthcare systems. The study was motivated by the Brazilian context of HTA, where meetings are being conducted to decide on the definition of a threshold. AREAS COVERED An electronic search was conducted on Medline (via PubMed), Lilacs (via BVS) and ScienceDirect followed by a complementary search of references of included studies, Google Scholar and conference abstracts. Cost-effectiveness thresholds are usually calculated through three different approaches: the willingness-to-pay, representative of welfare economics; the precedent method, based on the value of an already funded technology; and the opportunity cost method, which links the threshold to the volume of health displaced. An explicit threshold has never been formally adopted in most places. Some countries have defined thresholds, with some flexibility to consider other factors. An implicit threshold could be determined by research of funded cases. EXPERT COMMENTARY CETs have had an important role as a 'bridging concept' between the world of academic research and the 'real world' of healthcare prioritization. The definition of a cost-effectiveness threshold is paramount for the construction of a transparent and efficient Health Technology Assessment system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Soares Santos
- a Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy , Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) , Belo Horizonte , Brazil
| | - Augusto Afonso Guerra-Junior
- a Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy , Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) , Belo Horizonte , Brazil.,b SUS Collaborating Centre for Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health (CCATES), College of Pharmacy , Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) , Belo Horizonte , Brazil
| | - Brian Godman
- c Department of Pharmacoepidemiology , Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde , Glasgow , United Kingdom.,d Division of Clinical Pharmacology , Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Alec Morton
- e Department of Management Science , University of Strathclyde Business School , Glasgow , UK
| | - Cristina Mariano Ruas
- a Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy , Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) , Belo Horizonte , Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Expanding the breadth of Medicare: learning from Australia. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW 2018; 13:344-368. [DOI: 10.1017/s1744133117000421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe design of Australia’s Medicare programme was based on the Canadian scheme, adapted somewhat to take account of differences in the constitutional division of powers in the two countries and differences in history. The key elements are very similar: access to hospital services without charge being the core similarity, universal coverage for necessary medical services, albeit with a variable co-payment in Australia, the other. But there are significant differences between the two countries in health programmes – whether or not they are labelled as ‘Medicare’. This paper discusses four areas where Canada could potentially learn from Australia in a positive way. First, Australia has had a national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for almost 70 years. Second, there have been hesitant extensions to Australia’s Medicare to address the increasing prevalence of people with chronic conditions – extensions which include some payments for allied health professionals, ‘care coordination’ payments, and exploration of ‘health care homes’. Third, Australia has a much more extensive system of support for older people to live in their homes or to move into supported residential care. Fourth, Australia has gone further in driving efficiency in the hospital sector than has Canada. Finally, the paper examines aspects of the Australian health care system that Canada should avoid, including the very high level of out-of-pocket costs, and the role of private acute inpatient provision.
Collapse
|
75
|
Cameron D, Ubels J, Norström F. On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review. Glob Health Action 2018; 11:1447828. [PMID: 29564962 PMCID: PMC5930346 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1447828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The amount a government should be willing to invest in adopting new medical treatments has long been under debate. With many countries using formal cost-effectiveness (C/E) thresholds when examining potential new treatments and ever-growing medical costs, accurately setting the level of a C/E threshold can be essential for an efficient healthcare system. OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review is to describe the prominent approaches to setting a C/E threshold, compile available national-level C/E threshold data and willingness-to-pay (WTP) data, and to discern whether associations exist between these values, gross domestic product (GDP) and health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE). This review further examines current obstacles faced with the presently available data. METHODS A systematic review was performed to collect articles which have studied national C/E thresholds and willingness-to-pay (WTP) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in the general population. Associations between GDP, HALE, WTP, and C/E thresholds were analyzed with correlations. RESULTS Seventeen countries were identified from nine unique sources to have formal C/E thresholds within our inclusion criteria. Thirteen countries from nine sources were identified to have WTP per QALY data within our inclusion criteria. Two possible associations were identified: C/E thresholds with HALE (quadratic correlation of 0.63), and C/E thresholds with GDP per capita (polynomial correlation of 0.84). However, these results are based on few observations and therefore firm conclusions cannot be made. CONCLUSIONS Most national C/E thresholds identified in our review fall within the WHO's recommended range of one-to-three times GDP per capita. However, the quality and quantity of data available regarding national average WTP per QALY, opportunity costs, and C/E thresholds is poor in comparison to the importance of adequate investment in healthcare. There exists an obvious risk that countries might either over- or underinvest in healthcare if they base their decision-making process on erroneous presumptions or non-evidence-based methodologies. The commonly referred to value of 100,000$ USD per QALY may potentially have some basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cameron
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jasper Ubels
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Norström
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Jahn B, Rochau U, Kurzthaler C, Hubalek M, Miksad R, Sroczynski G, Paulden M, Bundo M, Stenehjem D, Brixner D, Krahn M, Siebert U. Personalized treatment of women with early breast cancer: a risk-group specific cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy accounting for companion prognostic tests OncotypeDX and Adjuvant!Online. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:685. [PMID: 29037213 PMCID: PMC5644100 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3603-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to high survival rates and the relatively small benefit of adjuvant therapy, the application of personalized medicine (PM) through risk stratification is particularly beneficial in early breast cancer (BC) to avoid unnecessary harms from treatment. The new 21-gene assay (OncotypeDX, ODX) is a promising prognostic score for risk stratification that can be applied in conjunction with Adjuvant!Online (AO) to guide personalized chemotherapy decisions for early BC patients. Our goal was to evaluate risk-group specific cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for women with early stage BC in Austria based on AO and ODX risk stratification. METHODS A previously validated discrete event simulation model was applied to a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old women over a lifetime horizon. We simulated twelve risk groups derived from the joint application of ODX and AO and included respective additional costs. The primary outcomes of interest were life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER). The robustness of results and decisions derived were tested in sensitivity analyses. A cross-country comparison of results was performed. RESULTS Chemotherapy is dominated (i.e., less effective and more costly) for patients with 1) low ODX risk independent of AO classification; and 2) low AO risk and intermediate ODX risk. For patients with an intermediate or high AO risk and an intermediate or high ODX risk, the ICER is below 15,000 EUR/QALY (potentially cost effective depending on the willingness-to-pay). Applying the AO risk classification alone would miss risk groups where chemotherapy is dominated and thus should not be considered. These results are sensitive to changes in the probabilities of distant recurrence but not to changes in the costs of chemotherapy or the ODX test. CONCLUSIONS Based on our modeling study, chemotherapy is effective and cost effective for Austrian patients with an intermediate or high AO risk and an intermediate or high ODX risk. In other words, low ODX risk suggests chemotherapy should not be considered but low AO risk may benefit from chemotherapy if ODX risk is high. Our analysis suggests that risk-group specific cost-effectiveness analysis, which includes companion prognostic tests are essential in PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Jahn
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ursula Rochau
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christina Kurzthaler
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 21A, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Hubalek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Christoph-Probst-Platz, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Rebecca Miksad
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, 02215 MA USA
- Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac St., 10th FL, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mike Paulden
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 10EN, Room 249, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G 2C4 ON Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave., Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3 Canada
| | - Marvin Bundo
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
| | - David Stenehjem
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, 30 South 2000 East Room 4781, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics, 2000 Cir of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, 84112 UT USA
| | - Diana Brixner
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, 30 South 2000 East Room 4781, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
- Program in Personalized Health, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Room 2160, Salt Lake City, 84112 UT USA
| | - Murray Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 10EN, Room 249, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G 2C4 ON Canada
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave. 2nd Floor, Boston, 02115 MA USA
- Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac St., 10th FL, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Kosaner Kliess M, Kluibenschaedl M, Zoehrer R, Schlick B, Scandurra F, Urban M. Cost-Utility of Partially Implantable Active Middle Ear Implants for Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Decision Analysis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 20:1092-1099. [PMID: 28964441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partially implantable active middle ear implants (aMEIs) offer a solution for individuals who have mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and an outer ear medical condition that precludes the use of hearing aids. When otherwise left untreated, individuals report a lower quality of life, which may further decrease with increasing disability. In the lack of cost-effectiveness studies and long-term data, there is a need for decision modeling. OBJECTIVE To explore individual-level variance in resource utilization patterns following aMEI implantation. METHODS A Markov model was developed and analyzed as microsimulation to estimate the incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) of partially implantable aMEIs compared with no (surgical) intervention in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and an outer ear medical condition in Australia. Cost data were derived mostly from the Medicare Benefit Schedule and effectiveness data from published literature. A third-party payer perspective was adopted, and a 5% discount rate was applied over a 10-year time horizon. RESULTS Compared with baseline strategy, aMEIs yielded an incremental cost of Australian dollars (AUD) 13,339.18, incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 1.35, and an ICUR of AUD 9,913.72/QALY. Of the respective number of simulated patients who visited each health state, 75.73% never had a minor adverse event, 99.82% did not experience device failure, and 97.75% did not cease to use their aMEIs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the ICUR to differ by only 0.95%. CONCLUSIONS In the Australian setting, partially implantable aMEIs offer a safe and cost-effective solution compared with no intervention and are also well accepted by users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ruth Zoehrer
- MED-EL Medical Electronics Ges.m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | - Michael Urban
- MED-EL Medical Electronics Ges.m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Schiller-Fruehwirth I, Jahn B, Einzinger P, Zauner G, Urach C, Siebert U. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 20:1048-1057. [PMID: 28964436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/15/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, Austrian health authorities implemented an organized breast cancer screening program. Until then, there has been a long-standing tradition of opportunistic screening. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of organized screening compared with opportunistic screening, as well as to identify factors influencing the clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS We developed and validated an individual-level state-transition model and assessed the health outcomes and costs of organized and opportunistic screening for 40-year-old asymptomatic women. The base-case analysis compared a scenario involving organized biennial screening with a scenario reflecting opportunistic screening practice for an average-risk woman aged 45 to 69 years. We applied an annual discount rate of 3% and estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of the cost (2012 euros) per life-year gained (LYG) from a health care perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. RESULTS Compared with opportunistic screening, an organized program yielded on average additional 0.0118 undiscounted life-years (i.e., 4.3 days) and cost savings of €41 per woman. In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of organized screening was approximately €20,000 per LYG compared with no screening. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000 per LYG, there was a 70% probability that organized screening would be considered cost-effective. The attendance rate, but not the test accuracy of mammography, was an influential factor for the cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS The decision to adopt organized screening is likely an efficient use of limited health care resources in Austria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irmgard Schiller-Fruehwirth
- Department of Evidence-Based Economic Health Care, Main Association of Austrian Social Security Institutions, Vienna, Austria; Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| | - Beate Jahn
- Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL-Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Patrick Einzinger
- dwh Simulation Services, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL-Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria; Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Mayer S, Kiss N, Łaszewska A, Simon J. Costing evidence for health care decision-making in Austria: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183116. [PMID: 28806728 PMCID: PMC5555669 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With rising healthcare costs comes an increasing demand for evidence-informed resource allocation using economic evaluations worldwide. Furthermore, standardization of costing and reporting methods both at international and national levels are imperative to make economic evaluations a valid tool for decision-making. The aim of this review is to assess the availability and consistency of costing evidence that could be used for decision-making in Austria. It describes systematically the current economic evaluation and costing studies landscape focusing on the applied costing methods and their reporting standards. Findings are discussed in terms of their likely impacts on evidence-based decision-making and potential suggestions for areas of development. METHODS A systematic literature review of English and German language peer-reviewed as well as grey literature (2004-2015) was conducted to identify Austrian economic analyses. The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, SSCI, EconLit, NHS EED and Scopus were searched. Publication and study characteristics, costing methods, reporting standards and valuation sources were systematically synthesised and assessed. RESULTS A total of 93 studies were included. 87% were journal articles, 13% were reports. 41% of all studies were full economic evaluations, mostly cost-effectiveness analyses. Based on relevant standards the most commonly observed limitations were that 60% of the studies did not clearly state an analytical perspective, 25% of the studies did not provide the year of costing, 27% did not comprehensively list all valuation sources, and 38% did not report all applied unit costs. CONCLUSION There are substantial inconsistencies in the costing methods and reporting standards in economic analyses in Austria, which may contribute to a low acceptance and lack of interest in economic evaluation-informed decision making. To improve comparability and quality of future studies, national costing guidelines should be updated with more specific methodological guidance and a national reference cost library should be set up to allow harmonisation of valuation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Mayer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Noemi Kiss
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Agata Łaszewska
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, General Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Czarnecka-Kujawa K, Rochau U, Siebert U, Atenafu E, Darling G, Waddell TK, Pierre A, De Perrot M, Cypel M, Keshavjee S, Yasufuku K. Cost-effectiveness of mediastinal lymph node staging in non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153:1567-1578. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
81
|
Soarez PCD, Novaes HMD. Cost-effectiveness thresholds and the Brazilian Unified National Health System. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2017; 33:e00040717. [PMID: 28538787 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00040717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
82
|
Zeichner SB, Kohn CG, Goldstein DA. Economics of ramucirumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16:733-745. [PMID: 27828732 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1259070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite its FDA approval and incorporation into the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines, ramucirumab (RAM) is associated with a drug acquisition cost that is substantially higher than other approved options. Given its substantial cost, the presence of a viable alternative treatment option, and its minimal survival improvement, the usefulness of RAM in clinical practice has been called into question. Areas covered: In this paper, we outline the cost, benefits, and economic implications of RAM from a US perspective, as it is used in the treatment of mCRC. We also dissect its use in other tumor types and in other healthcare systems around the world, and briefly compare it with similar drugs targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway. We used the search engine PubMed using the following as search terms: cost-effectiveness; ramucirumab; metastatic colon cancer; angiogenesis; and value-based medicine. Expert commentary: The use of ramucirumab in the treatment of mCRC serves as a microcosm of the worsening healthcare crisis within the US and the ongoing controversy regarding oncology drug costs, benefits, and value. Therefore, there must be a joint effort in moving towards value based pricing models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon B Zeichner
- a Division of Hematology & Oncology , Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA
| | - Christine G Kohn
- b Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center , University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy & UConn , Hartford , CT , USA
| | - Daniel A Goldstein
- a Division of Hematology & Oncology , Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA
- c Davidoff Cancer Center , Rabin Medical Center , Petah Tikva , Israel
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Jahn B, Rochau U, Kurzthaler C, Hubalek M, Miksad R, Sroczynski G, Paulden M, Kluibenschädl M, Krahn M, Siebert U. Cost effectiveness of personalized treatment in women with early breast cancer: the application of OncotypeDX and Adjuvant! Online to guide adjuvant chemotherapy in Austria. SPRINGERPLUS 2015; 4:752. [PMID: 26693110 PMCID: PMC4666888 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1440-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
A Breast Cancer Outcomes model was developed at the ONCOTYROL research center to evaluate personalized test-treatment strategies in Austria. The goal was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a new 21-gene assay (ODX) when used in conjunction with the Adjuvant! Online (AO) decision aid to support personalized decisions about use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients in Austria. We applied a validated discrete-event-simulation model to a hypothetical cohort of 50 years old women over a lifetime horizon. The test-treatment strategies of interest were defined using three-letter acronyms. The first (second, third) letter indicates whether patients with a low (intermediate, high) risk according to AO were tested using ODX (Y yes, N no). The main outcomes were life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs and cost effectiveness. Robustness of the results was tested in sensitivity analyses. Results were compared to a Canadian analysis conducted by the Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative (THETA). Five of eight strategies were dominated (i.e., more costly and less effective: NNY, NYN, YNN, YNY, YYN). The base-case analysis shows that YYY (ODX provided to all patients) is the most effective strategy and is cost effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 15,700 EUR per QALY gained. These results are sensitive to changes in the probabilities of distant recurrence, age and costs of chemotherapy. The results of the base-case analysis were comparable to the THETA results. Based on our analyses, using ODX in addition to AO is effective and cost effective in all women in Austria. The development of future genetic tests may require alternative or additional test-treatment strategies to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jahn
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria ; Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - U Rochau
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria ; Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - C Kurzthaler
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria ; Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Hubalek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - R Miksad
- Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | - G Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria ; Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Paulden
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada ; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - M Kluibenschädl
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria ; Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - U Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, A-6060 Hall i.T, Austria ; Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria ; Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, T.H.Chan Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ; Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|