Local control of brain metastases by stereotactic radiosurgery in relation to dose to the tumor margin

Reirradiation With Stereotactic Radiosurgery After Local or Marginal Recurrence of Brain Metastases From Previous Radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Brain metastases represent a major indication for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but further study is needed regarding repeat SRS (SRS2) after local or marginal recurrence after prior SRS (SRS1). We report local tumor control (LC) after SRS2 and identify predictors of radiation necrosis (RN) and symptomatic RN (SRN).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients had biopsy-proven non-small cell lung cancer and at least 1 brain metastasis previously treated with SRS. SRS2 was performed from 2015 to 2020 and required overlap of the prescription isodose lines with those from SRS1. Patients treated with preoperative SRS were excluded. Primary endpoints were LC by Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology criteria, RN, and SRN.

RESULTS

From 8 institutions, 102 patients with 123 treated lesions were included. SRS2 was performed at a median 12 months after SRS1. SRS2 delivered a median 18 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 16-18) margin dose to the 50% (IQR, 50%-70%) isodose line, maximum dose of 30.5 Gy (IQR, 25.0-36.0), and V12Gy of 3.38 cm³ (IQR, 0.83-7.64). One-year and 2-year LC were 79% and 72%, respectively. Local tumor control was improved with tumor volume ≤1 cm³ (P < .005). There were 25 (20%) cases of RN and 9 (7%) cases of SRN. For SRS1 and SRS2, SRN rates were higher with maximum doses ≥40 Gy or SRS2 V12Gy >9 cm³ (P < .025 for each). SRS1 and SRS2 maximum dose ≥40 Gy was also predictive of increased RN (P < .05 for each). Prior immunotherapy was not predictive of RN or SRN.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat SRS afforded a high rate of local tumor control and a low rate of SRN. At SRS2, V12Gy ≤9 cm³ and maximum dose <40 Gy may reduce the risks of RN and SRN. These results are most applicable to lesions with approximately 1 cm³ volume and 1-year interval between SRS courses.

Dosimetric comparison among dynamic conformal arc therapy, coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for single brain metastasis

In the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) by linear accelerator (LINAC), dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) with non-coplanar beams is conventionally used. However, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can improve target conformity, thereby decreasing the dose to organs at risk by inversed planning methods, but few studies have directly compared DCAT and VMAT with and without non-coplanar beams in patients with single brain metastasis. We therefore conducted a planning study to compare the dose distribution in DCAT, VMAT using only a coplanar arc (CoVMAT) and VMAT with non-coplanar arcs (NcVMAT) in the treatment of single brain metastasis. DCAT, CoVMAT and NcVMAT plans were created for 15 patients. The three modalities were compared in terms of target conformity, target coverage, the dose to normal brain tissue, monitor units (MUs) and beam-on time. Both conformity indices (RTOG-CI and IP-CI) as well as the D98% of the gross target volume (GTV) were significantly better in the NcVMAT plans than in the DCAT plans. Comparisons of the doses to normal brain tissue revealed that the V20Gy, V15Gy, V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy were significantly smaller in the NcVMAT plans than in the plans based on the other two modalities. The MUs of the DCAT and NcVMAT plans were larger than those of the CoVMAT plans, and the beam-on time was longer in the NcVMAT and CoVMAT plans than in the DCAT plans. Compared to the CoVMAT and DCAT plans, NcVMAT plans significantly improved target conformity and reduced the doses to normal brain tissue at V20Gy, V15Gy, V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Intact Brain Metastases in 5 Daily Fractions: Effect of Dose on Treatment Response

PURPOSE

Multileaf collimator (MLC) linear accelerator (Linac)-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) is increasingly used not only for large brain metastases or those adjacent to critical structures but also for those metastases that would otherwise be considered for single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS). However, data on outcomes in general are limited, and there is a lack of understanding regarding optimal dosing. Our aim was to report mature image-based outcomes for MLC-Linac HSRT with a focus on clinical and dosimetric factors associated with local failure (LF).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 220 patients with 334 brain metastases treated with HSRT were identified. All patients were treated using a 5-fraction daily regimen and were followed with clinical evaluation and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging every 2 to 3 months. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with LF determined using Fine and Gray's competing risk method. Predictive factors were identified using Cox regression multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.8 months. Median size of treated metastasis was 1.9 cm; 60% of metastases were <2 cm in size. The median total dose was 30 Gy in 5 fractions; 36% of the cohort received <30 Gy. The median time to LF and 12-month cumulative incidence of LF was 8.5 months and 23.8%, respectively. Median time to death and 12-month overall survival rates were 11.8 months and 48.2%, respectively. Fifty-two metastases (15.6%) had an adverse radiation effect, of which 32 (9.5%) were symptomatic necrosis. Multivariable analysis identified worse LF in patients who received a total dose of <30 Gy (hazard ratio, 1.62; P = .03), with LF at 6 and 12 months of 13% and 33% for patients treated with <30 Gy versus 5% and 19% for patients treated with >30 Gy. Exploratory analysis demonstrated a dose-response effect observed in all histologic types, including among breast cancer subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Optimal local control is achieved with HSRT of ≥30 Gy in 5 daily fractions, independent of tumor volume and histology, with an acceptable risk of radiation necrosis.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery-Based Combination Treatment Strategies Improve Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Metastases From Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Academic Institutions in Korea and Taiwan

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are rare. We investigated the clinico-pathological prognostic factors of patients with CNS metastases from EOC and compared the outcomes of various treatment modalities. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with CNS metastases from EOC between 2000 and 2020. Information on the clinical and pathological characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of these patients was retrieved from Samsung Medical Center and National Taiwan University Hospital. A total of 94 patients with CNS metastases were identified among 6,300 cases of EOC, resulting in an incidence of 1.49%. Serous histological type [hazard ratio (HR): 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.95), p=0.03], progressive disease [HR: 2.29 (95% CI 1.16-4.54), p=0.01], CNS involvement in first disease relapse [HR: 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.70), p=0.002], and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS)-based combination treatment for EOC patients with CNS lesions [HR: 0.59 (95% CI 0.44-0.79), p<0.001] significantly impacted survival after diagnosis of CNS metastases. In a subgroup analysis, superior survival was observed in patients with CNS involvement not in first tumor recurrence who underwent GKS-based combination therapeutic regimens. The survival benefit of GKS-based treatment was not significant in patients with CNS involvement in first disease relapse, but a trend for longer survival was still observed. In conclusion, GKS-based combination treatment can be considered for the treatment of EOC patients with CNS metastases. The patients with CNS involvement not in first disease relapse could significantly benefit from GKS-based combination strategies.

Possible Overcoming of Tumor Hypoxia with Adaptive Hypofractionated Radiosurgery of Large Brain Metastases: A Biological Modeling Study

OBJECTIVE

The present biological modeling study evaluated possible application of adaptive hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS), which involves escalation of the prescription dose according to the gradual decrease in the tumor volume between treatment sessions separated by 2- to 3-week intervals, in the management of large brain metastases.

METHODS

To investigate the effects of dose escalation during three-stage adaptive HSRS, a generalized biologically effective dose (gBED) model was applied. Accounting for both a nonuniform dose distribution inside the target and tumor hypoxia was implemented, and normal brain radiation dose distributions were assessed.

RESULTS

In comparison with conventional three-stage HSRS (with an identical prescription dose of 10 Gy at each treatment session), adaptive HSRS resulted in a 30-40% increase in gBED. This effect was especially prominent in late-responding targets (with α/β ratios from 3 to 10 Gy) and in neoplasms containing a high percentage of hypoxic cells. Despite dose escalation in the target, irradiation of the adjacent normal brain tissue was kept within safe limits at a level similar to that applied in conventional three-stage HSRS.

CONCLUSION

Adaptive HSRS theoretically results in significant enhancement of gBED in the target and may possibly overcome resistance to irradiation, which is caused by tumor hypoxia. These advantages may translate into higher treatment efficacy in cases of large brain metastases.

Interfractional target changes in brain metastases during 13-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The risk for radiation necrosis is lower in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) than in conventional radiotherapy, and 13-fraction SRT is our method of choice for the treatment of brain metastases ≥ around 2 cm or patients who are expected to have a good prognosis. As 13-fraction SRT lasts for at least 17 days, adaptive radiotherapy based on contrast-enhanced mid-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often necessary for patients undergoing 13-fraction SRT. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed interfractional target changes in patients with brain metastases treated with 13-fraction SRT.

METHODS

Our analyses included data from 23 patients and 27 metastatic brain lesions treated with 13-fraction SRT with dynamic conformal arc therapy. The peripheral dose prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) was 39-44.2 Gy in 13-fractions. The gross tumor volume (GTV) of the initial SRT plan (initial GTV), initial PTV, and modified GTV based on the mid-treatment MRI scan (mid-treatment GTV) were assessed.

RESULTS

The median initial GTV was 3.8 cm³ and the median time from SRT initiation to the mid-treatment MRI scan was 6 days. Compared to the initial GTV, the mid-treatment GTV increased by more than 20% in five lesions and decreased by more than 20% in five lesions. Interfractional GTV volume changes of more than 20% were not significantly associated with primary disease or the presence of cystic components/necrosis. The mid-treatment GTV did not overlap perfectly with the initial PTV in more than half of the lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the initial GTV, the mid-treatment GTV changed by more than 20% in almost one-third of lesions treated with 13-fraction SRT. As SRT usually generates a steep dose gradient as well as increasing the maximum dose of PTV compared to conventional radiotherapy, assessment of the volume and locational target changes and adaptive radiotherapy should be considered as the number of fractions increases.

Predicting local failure of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery with radiomics on planning MR images and dose maps

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an important modality in the treatment of brain metastases. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of radiomic features from planning magnetic resonance (MR) images and dose maps to predict local failure after SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Twenty-eight patients who received Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery for brain metastases were retrospectively reviewed in this IRB-approved study. 179 irradiated tumors included 42 that locally failed within one-year follow-up. Using SRS tumor volumes, radiomic features were calculated on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images acquired for treatment planning and planned dose maps. 125 radiomic features regarding tumor shape, dose distribution, MR intensities and textures were extracted for each tumor. Logistic regression with automatic feature selection was built to predict tumor progression from local control after SRS. Feature selection and model evaluation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed in a nested cross validation (CV) scheme. The associations between selected radiomic features and treatment outcomes were statistically assessed by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The logistic model with feature selection achieved ROC AUC of 0.82 ± 0.09 on 5-fold CV, providing 83% sensitivity and 70% specificity for predicting local failure. A total of 10 radiomic features including 1 shape feature, 6 MR images and 3 dose distribution features were selected. These features were significantly associated with treatment outcomes (p < 0.05). The model was validated on independent holdout data with an AUC of 0.78.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic features from planning MR images and dose maps provided prognostic information in SRS for brain metastases. A model built on the radiomic features shows promise for early prediction of tumor local failure after treatment, potentially aiding in personalized care for brain metastases.

Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer often cause neurologic symptoms which lead to initial diagnosis or identification of recurrence. In other patients, they are identified on surveillance imaging or when a patient undergoing treatment develops neurological symptoms. Patients with symptomatic lesions should be started on dexamethasone and evaluated by a neurosurgeon as soon as possible. If feasible, surgery should be offered to decrease intracranial pressure, alleviate symptoms, and prevent irreversible neurological damage. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity and any additional brain metastases should follow within 4 weeks of surgery, as early as 2 weeks post-op. Tissue from surgery is used to confirm the diagnosis and test for targetable oncogenic driver mutations. Treatment response and surveillance for development of additional lesions is assessed with MRI of the brain 1 month after SRS and every 3 months thereafter. Patients who are not surgical candidates or who have small, asymptomatic brain metastases should proceed with SRS, the preferred treatment, or sometimes whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) if multifocal disease requires more extensive treatment, such as for leptomeningeal spread of disease. The number of brain metastases that warrants use of WBRT over SRS is controversial and a topic of ongoing investigation, and is discussed in this review. When possible, SRS is preferred over WBRT due to reduce morbidity and cognitive side effects. When patients are already on systemic therapy at time of brain metastases diagnosis, systemic therapy should continue, with radiation therapy occurring between cycles. Regarding systemic therapy for new diagnosis at time of brain metastases presentation, molecular testing will guide treatment choice, when available. If there is no neurosurgical intervention, biopsy of another site of disease may provide tissue for molecular testing. If there are no targetable oncogenic driver mutations, concurrent immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and chemotherapy is preferable for patients who can tolerate it. Single-agent ICB is an alternative option for patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy. Systemic therapy should start as soon as possible. In some patients with poor performance status, best supportive care may be the most appropriate choice. Treatment decisions should always incorporate patients' goals of care and in many cases should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Patients with Solitary Brain Metastases

Purpose

To analyze retrospectively the clinical efficacy and safety for patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) using volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2017, 46 patients with solitary brain metastasis who underwent FSRT consisting of 25-40 Gy/5 fractions were recruited in this study. All targets within the same course received different prescriptions according to size. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results

The median follow-up was 11 months (3-53 months). The 6-month and 12-month local control rate calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimate was, respectively, 95% and 86%. Tumor diameter < 2.5 cm obtained 100% improved 12-month local control rate compared with 66% in those with ≥2.5 cm (P < 0.001). The 12-month local control calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimate was 95% in tumors with >30 Gy treatment and only 60% in tumors with ≤30 Gy treatment (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the prescription dose ≤ 30 Gy resulted in increased local failure (hazard ratio (HR), 0.14 (range, 0.019-0.95; P = .046)). Grade 3 or worse toxic effects were found in 5 (11%) patients, and no patient experienced surgical resection for symptomatic radioactive necrosis.

Conclusions

FSRT for solid brain metastasis appears to have the advantages of a high rate of local control with a minimal risk of severe toxicity and deserves application in the clinical practice.

Predicting response to radiotherapy of intracranial metastases with hyperpolarized [Formula: see text]C MRI

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used to manage intracranial metastases in a significant fraction of patients. Local progression after SRS can often only be detected with increased volume of enhancement on serial MRI scans which may lag true progression by weeks or months.

METHODS

Patients with intracranial metastases (N = 11) were scanned using hyperpolarized [Formula: see text]C MRI prior to treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The status of each lesion was then recorded at six months post-treatment follow-up (or at the time of death).

RESULTS

The positive predictive value of [Formula: see text]C-lactate signal, measured pre-treatment, for prediction of progression of intracranial metastases at six months post-treatment with SRS was 0.8 [Formula: see text], and the AUC from an ROC analysis was 0.77 [Formula: see text]. The distribution of [Formula: see text]C-lactate z-scores was different for intracranial metastases from different primary cancer types (F = 2.46, [Formula: see text]).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperpolarized [Formula: see text]C imaging has potential as a method for improving outcomes for patients with intracranial metastases, by identifying patients at high risk of treatment failure with SRS and considering other therapeutic options such as surgery.

Single-fraction versus hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery for small metastatic brain tumors

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a standard of care for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors (METs). Although a better balance of tumor control and toxicity of hypofractionated SRS (hfSRS) compared with single-fraction SRS (sfSRS) was demonstrated in large METs, there is no data comparing two approaches for small METs (< 4 cm³). It was aimed to compare clinical outcomes between sfSRS versus hfSRS Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in a series of patients with unresected, small METs. Patients (n = 208) treated with sfGKRS or hfGKRS between June 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively examined in a single center. The co-primary endpoints of local control (LC) and toxicity were estimated by applying the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards (HR) modeling was used to assess the effect of independent variables on the outcomes. The actuarial LC rate was 99.7% at six months and 98.8% at 18 months in the sfGKRS group, and 99.4% and 94.3% in the hfGKRS group (p = 0.089), respectively. In multivariate analysis, MET volume (p = 0.023, HR 2.064) and biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) (p < 0.0001, HR 0.753) was associated with LC. In total, treatment-related toxicity was observed in 13 (8.7%) patients during a median period of 10 weeks (range 1-31). Radiation necrosis was observed in four patients (1.9%), and all patients were in the sfGKRS group (p = 0.042). Only the maximum dose was associated with toxicity (p = 0.032, HR 1.047). Our current results suggest that hfGKRS is advantageous and beneficial also in patients with unresected, small METs.

Control and Toxicity in Melanoma Versus Other Brain Metastases in Response to Combined Radiosurgery and PD-(L)1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

Purpose

Prior studies have mixed conclusions about the efficacy and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity profile of combining radiosurgery with anti-programed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for brain metastases. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of combined radiosurgery and anti-PD-1 ICI for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases (BM).

Methods and Materials

Forty-one patients with 153 radiation naïve melanoma BM and 33 patients with 118 BM of NSCLC and RCC origin from 2014 through 2019 received radiosurgery and either anti PD-1 receptor inhibition or anti PD-L1 inhibition targeting the PD-1 ligand with less than 4 months separating either therapy. Similar to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9005, high-grade CNS toxicity was defined as irreversible grade 3 or any grade 4/5 neurologic event. Salvage resection revealing necrosis and viable tumor was considered grade 4 toxicity and local failure. An increase in greatest cross-sectional diameter of 25% on contrasted magnetic resonance imaging was designated as a local failure.

Results

Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-41 months). Local control was estimated to be 90.3% at 1 year. Distant control was 38.8% at 1 year, and neither local nor distant control were significantly influenced by limiting steroids to the day of treatment (P = .55, .52 respectively). One-year freedom from high-grade toxicity was 90.4% for patients and 94.6% for tumors. Though melanoma accounted for 41 (55%) patients and 153 (56%) tumors, it accounted for all high-grade toxicities (P = .03). These patients had some combination of high tumor burden, aggressive steroid taper, and treatment with ipilimumab.

Conclusions

Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with anti-PD-1 ICI appears to result in a high rate of local tumor control and a low rate of high-grade CNS toxicity, comparable to historical series with radiosurgery alone. High-grade toxicity is more likely in melanoma than RCC and NSCLC. Coming prospective studies will shed light on further questions about treatment timing, steroids, and response.

Timing of Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Affects Local Control of Resected Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

For resected brain metastases (BMs), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often offered to minimize local recurrence (LR). Although the aim is to deliver SRS within a few weeks of surgery, a variety of socioeconomic, medical, and procedural issues can cause delays. We evaluated the relationship between timing of postoperative SRS and LR.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified a consecutive series of patients with BM managed with resection and SRS or fractionated SRS at our institution from 2012 to 2018. We assessed the correlation of time to SRS and other demographic, disease, and treatment variables with LR, local recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 64.5 years. Approximately half of patients had a single BM, and median BM size was 2.9 cm. Gross total resection was achieved in 111 patients (83.5%), and more than 90% of patients received fractionated SRS. The median time to SRS was 37.0 days, and the LR rate was 16.4%. Time to SRS was predictive of LR. The median time from surgery to SRS was 34.0 days for patients without LR versus 61.0 days for those with LR (P < .01). The LR rate was 2.3% with SRS administered ≤4 weeks postoperatively, compared with 23.6% if SRS was administered >4 weeks postoperatively (P < .01). Local recurrence-free survival was also improved for patients who underwent SRS at ≤4 weeks (P = .02). Delayed SRS was also predictive of distant recurrence (P = .02) but not overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, the strongest predictor of LR after postoperative SRS for BM was time to SRS, and a cutoff of 4 weeks was a reliable predictor of recurrence. These findings merit investigation in a prospective, randomized trial.

Durable 5-year local control for resected brain metastases with early adjuvant SRS: the effect of timing on intended-field control

Background

Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) improves the local control of resected brain metastases (BrM). However, the dependency of long-term outcomes on SRS timing relative to surgery remains unclear.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with metastasectomy-plus-adjuvant SRS at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) between 2013 and 2016 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to describe overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence rates were estimated by type of recurrence, accounting for death as a competing event. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and competing risks regression modeling assessed prognostic variables and associated events of interest.

Results

Two hundred and eighty-two patients with BrM had a median OS of 1.5 years (95% CI: 1.2-2.1) from adjuvant SRS with median follow-up of 49.8 months for survivors. Local surgical recurrence, other simultaneously SRS-irradiated site recurrence, and distant central nervous system (CNS) progression rates were 14.3% (95% CI: 10.1-18.5), 4.9% (95% CI: 2.3-7.5), and 47.5% (95% CI: 41.4-53.6) at 5 years, respectively. Median time-to-adjuvant SRS (TT-SRS) was 34 days (IQR: 27-39). TT-SRS was significantly associated with surgical site recurrence rate (P = 0.0008). SRS delivered within 1 month resulted in surgical site recurrence rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.3-10.9) at 1-year, compared to 9.2% (95% CI: 4.9-13.6) if delivered between 1 and 2 months, or 27.3% (95% CI: 0.0-55.5) if delivered >2 months after surgery. OS was significantly lower for patients with TT-SRS >~2 months. Postoperative length of stay, discharge to a rehabilitation facility, urgent care visits, and/or disease recurrence between surgery and adjuvant SRS associated with increased TT-SRS.

Conclusions

Adjuvant SRS provides durable local control. However, delays in initiation of postoperative SRS can decrease its efficacy.

Dose homogeneity analysis of adjuvant radiation treatment in surgically resected brain metastases: Comparison of IORT, SRS, and IMRT indices

PURPOSE

Although surgery remains a treatment option for symptomatic brain metastases, the need for adjuvant radiation after surgery is widely accepted as standard. Despite a multitude of randomized trials aimed at identifying the ideal radiation treatment plan for surgically resected metastases, the development of new delivery regiments necessitates a periodic re-evaluation of dosimetric performance/outcome. Here, we compare the homogeneity index (HI) across three platforms: single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), multisession stereotactic radiotherapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated with IORT after surgical resection of brain metastases were identified and dosimetric parameters collected from the dose-volume histograms based on the development of conformal plans for adjuvant radiation using Gamma Knife-SRS (GK-SRS), linear accelerator based intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and IORT. HIs were calculated using four established methods and compared across platforms within the patient cohort. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The mean maximal doses for the GK-SRS and IMRT plans were 30 Gy and 29 Gy with margin prescription doses of 16 Gy and 24 Gy, respectively. The IORT dose was 30 Gy to the applicator surface. HIs varied based on calculation methods, but maintained consistency when comparing across platforms with IORT having the lower mean HI value (0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.60) in single-fraction treatment, compared with GK-SRS (0.77; 95% CI 0.76-0.80). The mean multisession IMRT HI was lower than both single-fraction treatment modalities at 0.41 (95% CI 0.40-0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

When using the HI as the primary dosimetric parameter for adjuvant radiation plans after surgical resection of brain metastases IORT offers improved dose homogeneity compared with GK-SRS in single-fraction treatment, whereas fractionated LINAC-based IMRT was superior with respect to the HI in comparison among all three methods.

A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases: Clinical Trial Protocol

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases which require resection are treated with surgery followed by whole brain radiation therapy or postoperative cavity boost stereotactic radiosurgery (POCBS). Recently a novel strategy using neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) followed by resection was reported, demonstrating lower rates of postoperative leptomeningeal dissemination (LMD) and symptomatic radiation toxicity compared to a comparative cohort of patients treated with postoperative SRS.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the rate of symptomatic radiation toxicity at 1 yr in patients who receive NaSRS differs significantly from historical rates for patients treated with POCBS.

METHODS

This is a multi-center, non-randomized, open phase II clinical trial. A total of 30 patients with up to 10 brain metastases, at least 1 of which is appropriate for surgical resection, will be enrolled for over 4 yr. All enrolled patients will be assigned to receive NaSRS followed by surgery.

EXPECTED OUTCOME

This study will clarify whether symptomatic radiation toxicity caused by NaSRS is significantly decreased compared to historical rates associated with POCBS. Secondary endpoints will include 1-yr local control (LC) of the treated lesion, 1-yr rates of LMD, median survival and 2-yr rates of progression-free and overall survival. Tertiary analyses will include correlation between LC and radiation toxicity with pretreatment clinical factors, serum markers, radiomic features, and molecular assessments of the resected tumors.

DISCUSSION

This prospective study will determine the toxicity associated with NaSRS and provide additional quantitative metrics of efficacy for future comparative trials.

Hypofractionated frameless gamma knife radiosurgery for large metastatic brain tumors

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery has become an alternative for metastatic brain tumors (METs). We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of frameless hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (hfGKRS) in the management of unresected, large METs. All patients who were managed with hfGKRS for unresected, large METs (> 4 cm³) between June 2017 and June 2020 at a single center were reviewed in this retrospective study. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were investigated. A total of 58 patients and 76 METs with regular follow-up were analyzed. LC rate was 98.5% at six months, 96.0% at one year, and 90.6% at 2 years during a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 2-37). The log-rank test indicated no difference in the distribution of LC for any clinical or treatment variable. PFS was 86.7% at 6 months, 66.6% at 1 year, and 58.5% at 2 years. OS was 81% at 6 months, 63.6% at one year, and 50.7% at 2 years. On the log-rank test, clinical parameters such as control status of primary cancer, presence of extracranial metastases, RTOG-RPA class, GPA group, and ds-GPA group were significantly associated with PFS and OS. Patients presented with grade 1 (19.0%), grade 2 (3.5%) and grade 3 (5.2%) side effects. Radiation necrosis was not observed in any patients. Our current results suggest that frameless hfGKRS for unresected, large METs is a rational alternative in selected patients with promising results.

Cumulative Intracranial Tumor Volume as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Brain Metastases Undergoing Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Approximately 25-35% of all cancer patients suffer from brain metastases (BM), and many of them-in particular, those with a limited number of intracranial tumors-are treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Accurate prediction of survival remains a key clinical challenge in this population. Several prognostic scales have been developed to facilitate this prognostication, including the Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) classification, the modified Recursive Partitioning Analysis (mRPA) subclassifications, the Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BS-BM), the Score Index for Radiosurgery (SIR), the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), and the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (dsGPA). However, none of these scales include consideration of the cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), which is defined as the sum of all intracranial tumor volumes. Since there is mounting evidence that the CITV carries significant prognostic value in SRS-treated patients with BM, this variable should be considered during survival prognostication, along with other pertinent clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics.

Tumor Control Probability of Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

As part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, tumor control probability (TCP) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) for brain metastases was modeled based on pooled dosimetric and clinical data from published English-language literature.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed-indexed studies published between January 1995 and September 2017 were used to evaluate dosimetric and clinical predictors of TCP after SRS or fSRS for brain metastases. Eligible studies had ≥10 patients and included detailed dose-fractionation data with corresponding ≥1-year local control (LC) data, typically evaluated as a >20% increase in diameter of the targeted lesion using the pre-SRS diameter as a reference.

RESULTS

Of 2951 potentially eligible manuscripts, 56 included sufficient dose-volume data for analyses. Accepting that necrosis and pseudoprogression can complicate the assessment of LC, for tumors ≤20 mm, single-fraction doses of 18 and 24 Gy corresponded with >85% and 95% 1-year LC rates, respectively. For tumors 21 to 30 mm, an 18 Gy single-fraction dose was associated with 75% LC. For tumors 31 to 40 mm, a 15 Gy single-fraction dose yielded ∼69% LC. For 3- to 5-fraction fSRS using doses in the range of 27 to 35 Gy, 80% 1-year LC has been achieved for tumors of 21 to 40 mm in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

TCP for SRS and fSRS are presented. For small lesions ≤20 mm, single doses of ≈18 Gy appear generally associated with excellent rates of LC; for melanoma, higher doses seem warranted. For larger lesions >20 mm, local control rates appear to be ≈ 70% to 75% with usual doses of 15 to 18 Gy, and in this setting, fSRS regimens should be considered. Greater consistency in reporting of dosimetric and LC data is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses. As systemic and biologic therapies evolve, updated analyses will be needed to further assess the necessity, efficacy, and toxicity of SRS and fSRS.

The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Large Brain Metastases

Simple Summary

Brain metastases are the most common cause of cancerous brain tumors in adults. Large brain metastases are an especially difficult clinical scenario as patients often have debilitating symptoms from these tumors, and large tumors are more difficult to control with traditional single treatment radiation regimens alone or after surgery. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a novel way to deliver the higher doses of radiation to control large tumors either after surgery (most common), alone (common), or potentially before surgery (uncommon). Herein, we describe how delivering high doses over three or five treatments may improve tumor control and decrease complication rates compared to more traditional single treatment regimens for brain metastases larger than 2 cm in maximum dimension.

Abstract

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignant tumor in adults and are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. Large brain metastases, defined as tumors with a maximum dimension >2 cm, present a unique clinical challenge for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as patients often present with neurologic symptoms that require expeditious treatment that must also be balanced against the potential consequences of surgery and radiation therapy—namely, leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and radionecrosis (RN). Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and pre-operative SRS have emerged as novel treatment techniques to help improve local control rates and reduce rates of RN and LMD for this patient population commonly managed with post-operative SRS. Recent literature suggests that pre-operative SRS can potentially half the risk of LMD compared to post-operative SRS and that HSRT can improve risk of RN to less than 10% while improving local control when meeting the appropriate goals for biologically effective dose (BED) and dose-volume constraints. We recommend a 3- or 5-fraction regimen in lieu of SRS delivering 15 Gy or less for large metastases or resection cavities. We provide a table comparing the BED of commonly used SRS and HSRT regimens, and provide an algorithm to help guide the management of these challenging clinical scenarios.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases: Optimizing the dosimetric parameters

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of four plans for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large brain metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten patients treated with upfront NovalisTx® non-coplanar multiple dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) HFSRT for≥25mm diameter single BM were included. Three other volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were evaluated: with coplanar arcs (Eclipse®, Varian, VMATc_Eclipse®), with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs (VMATnc_Eclipse®), and with non-coplanar arcs (Elements Cranial SRS®, Brainlab, VMATnc_Elements®). The marginal dose prescribed for the PTV was 23.1Gy (isodose 70%) in three fractions. The mean GTV was 27mm³.

RESULTS

Better conformity indices were found with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (1.05 vs 1.28, P<0.05). Better gradient indices were found with VMATnc_Elements® and DCA (2.43 vs 3.02, P<0.001). High-dose delivery in healthy brain was lower with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (5.6 to 6.3 cc vs 9.4 cc, P<0.001). Low-dose delivery (V5Gy) was lower with VMATnc_Eclipse® or VMATnc_Elements® than with DCA (81 or 94 cc vs 110 cc, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

NovalisTx® VMAT HFSRT for≥25mm diameter brain metastases provides the best dosimetric compromise in terms of target coverage, sparing of healthy brain tissue and low-dose delivery compared to DCA.

Brain Metastases: A Modern Multidisciplinary Approach

Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial neoplasm and represent a major clinical challenge across many medical disciplines. The incidence of BM is increasing, largely due to improvements in primary disease therapeutics conferring greater systemic control, and advancements in neuroimaging techniques and availability leading to earlier diagnosis. In recent years, the landscape of BM treatment has changed significantly with the advent of personalized targeted chemotherapies and immunotherapy, the adoption of focal radiotherapy (RT) for higher intracranial disease burden, and the implementation of new surgical strategies. The increasing permutations of options available for the treatment of patients diagnosed with BM necessitate coordinated care by a multidisciplinary team. This review discusses the current treatment regimens for BM as well as examines the salient features of a modern multidisciplinary approach.

Current Multimodality Treatments Against Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Brain metastasis (BM) is generally one of poor prognostic factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, because of longer control of extra-cranial disease by the recent introduction of molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor, the incidence of BM has been recently increasing and to progress the treatment of BM is one of urgent medical unmet needs. Although the pivotal clinical trials usually excluded patients with BM, BM subgroup data from the prospective and retrospective series have been gradually accumulated. To select the appropriate strategy, individual patient and tumor characteristics (e.g., Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), systemic cancer burden, the number/size/location of BM) are important information. Among the local treatments, the technology of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRT) has been especially advanced and its adaptation has been expanded. The combination of SRT with molecular target therapy and/or immune checkpoint inhibitor would be promising to further enhance the efficacy without increased toxicity.

Abstract

In patients with renal cell carcinoma, brain metastasis is generally one of the poor prognostic factors. However, the recent introduction of molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor has remarkably advanced the systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and prolonged the patients’ survival. The pivotal clinical trials of those agents usually excluded patients with brain metastasis. The incidence of brain metastasis has been increasing in the actual clinical setting because of longer control of extra-cranial disease. Brain metastasis subgroup data from the prospective and retrospective series have been gradually accumulated about the risk classification of brain metastasis and the efficacy and safety of those new agents for brain metastasis. While the local treatment against brain metastasis includes neurosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and conventional whole brain radiation therapy, the technology of stereotactic radiosurgery has been especially advanced, and the combination with systemic therapy such as molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor is considered promising. This review summarizes recent progression of multimodality treatment of brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma from literature data and explores the future direction of the treatment.

Radiation and Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Lead to Long Term Disease Control in a Metastatic RCC patient With Brain Metastases

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprises 4.2% of all new cancer cases in the United States and 30% of cases are metastatic (mRCC) at diagnosis. Brain metastatic RCC historically has poor prognosis, but the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized their care and may be successfully combined with SBRT to improve prognosis. Here, we present a case of a patient with mRCC who had brain metastases treated with concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitors and SBRT. He continues to survive with good functional status years following his initial diagnosis. We discuss the relevant history regarding treatment approach in patients with brain metastatic RCC, ongoing trials focusing on the combination of immunotherapy and radiation, and the potential and promise of the abscopal effect.

Outcome evaluation of patients treated with fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large (> 3 cm) brain metastases: a dose-escalation study

OBJECTIVE

Fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) represents a feasible option for patients with large brain metastases (BM). However, the dose-fractionation scheme balanced between local control and radiation-induced toxicity remains unclear. Therefore, the authors conducted a dose-escalation study using fractionated GKS as the primary treatment for large (> 3 cm) BM.

METHODS

The exclusion criteria were more than 3 lesions, evidence of leptomeningeal disease, metastatic melanoma, poor general condition, and previously treated lesions. Patients were randomized to receive 24, 27, or 30 Gy in 3 fractions (8, 9, or 10 Gy per fraction, respectively). The primary endpoint was the development of radiation necrosis assessed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the study. The secondary endpoints included the local progression-free survival (PFS) rate, change in tumor volume, development of distant intracranial progression, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between September 2016 and April 2018, 60 patients were eligible for the study, with 46 patients (15, 17, and 14 patients in the 8-, 9-, and 10-Gy groups, respectively) available for analysis. The median follow-up duration was 9.6 months (range 2.5-25.1 months). The 6-month estimated cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis was 0% in the 8-Gy group, 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-29%) in the 9-Gy group, and 37% (95% CI 1%-58%) in the 10-Gy group. Being in the 10-Gy group was a significant risk factor for the development of radiation necrosis (p = 0.047; hazard ratio [HR] 7.2, 95% CI 1.1-51.4). The 12-month local PFS rates were 65%, 80%, and 75% in the 8-, 9-, and 10-Gy groups, respectively. Being in the 8-Gy group was a risk factor for local treatment failure (p = 0.037; HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-29.6). The mean volume change from baseline was a 47.5% decrease in this cohort. Distant intracranial progression and overall survival did not differ among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this dose-escalation study, 27 Gy in 3 fractions appeared to be a relevant regimen of fractionated GKS for large BM because 30 Gy in 3 fractions resulted in unacceptable toxicities and 24 Gy in 3 fractions was associated with local treatment failure.

Tuning-Target-Guided Inverse Planning of Brain Tumors With Abutting Organs at Risk During Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose We proposed a planning strategy that utilized tuning targets to guide GammaKnife (GK) Inverse Planning (IP) to deliver higher dose to the tumor, while keeping acceptable dose to the abutting organ at risk (OAR). Methods Ten patients with a large portion of brain tumor abutting the OAR previously treated with GK stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were selected. For each patient, multiple tuning targets were created by cropping the target contour from three-dimensional (3D) expansions of the OAR. The number of the tuning targets depended on the complexity of the planning process. To demonstrate dose sparing effect, an IP plan was generated for each tuning target after one round of optimization without shot fine-tuning. In the dose enhancement study, a more aggressive target dose was prescribed to the tuning target with a larger margin and one to two shots were filled in the region with missing dose. The resulting plans were compared to the previously approved clinical plans. Results For all 10 patients, a dose sparing effect was observed, i.e. both target coverage and dose to the OARs decreased when the margins of 3D expansion increased. For one patient, a margin of 6 mm was needed to decrease the maximum dose to the optical chiasm and optical nerve by 44.3% and 28.4%, respectively. For the other nine patients, the mean dropping rate of V12Gyto brain stem were 28.2% and 59.5% for tuning targets of 1 and 2 mm margins, respectively. In the dose enhancement study, the tuning-target-guided plans were hotter than the approved treatment plans, while keeping similar dose to the OARs. The mean of the treatment and enhancement dose was 15.6 ± 2.2 Gy and 18.5 ± 3.2 Gy, respectively. The mean coverage of the target by prescription dose was slightly higher in the enhancement plans (96.9 ± 2.6% vs 96.3 ± 3.6%), whereas the mean coverage of the enhancement dose was 20.1% higher in the enhancement plans (89.6 ± 9.0% vs 74.6 ± 19.9%). Conclusions We demonstrated that an inverse planning strategy could facilitate target dose enhancement for challenging GK cases while keeping acceptable OAR dose.

A simple score to estimate the likelihood of pseudoprogression vs. recurrence following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: The Bergen Criteria

Background

A major challenge in the follow-up of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) is to distinguish pseudoprogression (PP) from tumor recurrence (TR). The aim of the study was to develop a clinical risk assessment score.

Methods

Follow-up images of 87 of 97 consecutive patients treated with SRS for 348 BM were analyzed. Of these, 100 (28.7%) BM in 48 (53.9%) patients responded with either TR (n = 53, 15%) or PP (n = 47, 14%). Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed and used to develop a risk assessment score (the Bergen Criteria).

Results

Factors associated with a higher incidence of PP vs. TR were as follows: prior radiation with whole brain radiotherapy or SRS (P = .001), target cover ratio ≥98% (P = .048), BM volume ≤2 cm³ (P = .054), and primary lung cancer vs. other cancer types (P = .084). Based on the presence (0) or absence (1) of these 5 characteristics, the Bergen Criteria was established. A total score <2 points was associated with 100% PP, 2 points with 57% PP and 43% TR, 3 points with 57% TR and 43% PP, whereas >3 points were associated with 84% TR and 16% PP, P < .001.

Conclusion

Based on 5 characteristics at the time of SRS the Bergen Criteria could robustly differentiate between PP vs. TR following SRS. The score is user-friendly and provides a useful tool to guide the decision making whether to retreat or observe at appropriate follow-up intervals.

A multi-center analysis of single-fraction versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastasis

Background

Hypofractionated-SRS (HF-SRS) may allow for improved local control and a reduced risk of radiation necrosis compared to single-fraction-SRS (SF-SRS). However, data comparing these two treatment approaches are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between SF-SRS versus HF-SRS across our multi-center academic network.

Methods

Patients treated with SF-SRS or HF-SRS for brain metastasis from 2013 to 2018 across 5 radiation oncology centers were retrospectively reviewed. SF-SRS dosing was standardized, whereas HF-SRS dosing regimens were variable. The co-primary endpoints of local control and radiation necrosis were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to evaluate the impact of select independent variables on the outcomes of interest. Propensity score adjustments were used to reduce the effects confounding variables. To assess dose response for HF-SRS, Biologic Effective Dose (BED) assuming an α/β of 10 (BED₁₀) was used as a surrogate for total dose.

Results

One-hundred and fifty six patients with 335 brain metastasis treated with SF-SRS (n = 222 lesions) or HF-SRS (n = 113 lesions) were included. Prior whole brain radiation was given in 33% (n = 74) and 34% (n = 38) of lesions treated with SF-SRS and HF-SRS, respectively (p = 0.30). After a median follow up time of 12 months in each cohort, the adjusted 1-year rate of local control and incidence of radiation necrosis was 91% (95% CI 86–96%) and 85% (95% CI 75–95%) (p = 0.26) and 10% (95% CI 5–15%) and 7% (95% CI 0.1–14%) (p = 0.73) for SF-SRS and HF-SRS, respectively. For lesions > 2 cm, the adjusted 1 year local control was 97% (95% CI 84–100%) for SF-SRS and 64% (95% CI 43–85%) for HF-SRS (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, SRS fractionation was not associated with local control and only size ≤2 cm was associated with a decreased risk of developing radiation necrosis (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07–0.58, p < 0.01). For HF-SRS, 1 year local control was 100% for lesions treated with a BED₁₀ ≥ 50 compared to 77% (95% CI 65–88%) for lesions that received a BED₁₀ < 50 (p = 0.09).

Conclusions

In this comparison study of dose fractionation for the treatment of brain metastases, there was no difference in local control or radiation necrosis between HF-SRS and SF-SRS. For HF-SRS, a BED₁₀ ≥ 50 may improve local control.

Two-Session Radiosurgery for Large Primary Tumors Affecting the Brain

Introduction Surgery is an option for patients with large, symptomatic primary tumors affecting the brain. However, surgery might not be suitable for all tumors, especially those located in sensitive areas such as the pineal region and the hypothalamus. Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) might not provide an adequate dose for long-term local control due to the initial tumor volume and the involvement of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs). Two-session radiosurgery has been described as a feasible strategy for dose escalation in large secondary brain tumors. This report describes a series of patients treated upfront with two-session radiosurgery for primary tumors affecting the brain. Materials and methods From May 2017 to January 2020, eight patients with primary tumors affecting the brain were treated with two-session radiosurgery due to either an initial large tumor volume or tumor localization and the involvement of OARs. The response was assessed by imaging and clinical evaluations. Results A total of eight patients were treated, nine tumors were treated with two-session radiosurgery, four patients had tumors in the pineal region (50%), and the rest were in the hypothalamic region (25%) or elsewhere. The mean tumor volume for the first SRS session was 15 mL (range 5.2 to 51.6 mL), the mean prescription dose was 13 Gy, and the timespan between both sessions was 30 days (range, 30 to 42 days). During the second session, tumor volume was reduced to 73.6% (range, -20% to 98.7%) of the original dimension, mean tumor volume was 5 mL (range, 0.1 to 17.8 ml), mean prescription dose for the second session was 16.2 Gy estimated by time, dose, and fractionation and by bioequivalent dose under alpha-beta values often to be equivalent to a single dose of 15.8 Gy. Doses to the OARs for the optic pathway were equivalent to a single maximum dose of 9.75 Gy (range, 7.12 to 10.92), and to the brainstem, the equivalent was a maximum dose of 12.3 Gy (range, 5.6 to 15.07). At last follow-up, at a mean of 336.5 days (range, 65 to 962 days), seven patients were alive, five tumors had a partial response (PR), and three had stable disease in accordance to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. One patient died 435 days after treatment, the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90 at the first session, 90 at the second session, and was maintained at last follow-up. No adverse radiation effects were reported. Conclusions Two-stage SRS proved to be a safe method to escalate dose in proportionately large volume primary brain tumors whose histology is expected to have a quick biological response to radiation. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness by tumor subtypes of two-stage SRS in the same manner as it has been proven in single session SRS series in smaller tumor volumes.

Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for small to medium-sized brain metastases are exceptionally dependent upon tumor size and prescribed dose

BACKGROUND

At our institution, we have historically treated brain metastasis (BM) ≤2 cm in eloquent brain with a radiosurgery (SRS) lower prescription dose (PD) to reduce the risk of radionecrosis (RN). We sought to evaluate the impact of this practice on outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective registry of BM patients treated with SRS between 2008 and 2017. Incidences of local failure (LF) and RN were determined and Cox regression was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses (MVAs).

RESULTS

We evaluated 1533 BM ≤2 cm. Median radiographic follow-up post SRS was 12.7 months (1.4-100). Overall, the 2-year incidence of LF was lower for BM treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.3%) compared with PD ≤15 Gy (19.5%) (sub-hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.7; P = 0.0006). The 2-year incidence of RN was not significantly higher for the group treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.5%) compared with the PD ≤15 Gy group (7.5%) (P = 0.16). MVA demonstrated that PD (≤15 Gy) and tumor size (>1 cm) were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with higher rates of LF and RN, respectively. For tumors ≤1 cm, when comparing PD ≤15 Gy with ≥21 Gy, the risks of LF and RN are equivalent. However, for lesions >1 cm, PD ≥21 Gy is associated with a lower incidence of LF without significantly increasing the risk of RN.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that rates of LF or RN following SRS for BM are strongly correlated with size and PD. Based on our results, we now, depending upon the clinical context, consider increasing PD to 21 Gy for BM in eloquent brain, excluding the brainstem.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of adults with metastatic brain tumors

Brain metastasis is the most common type of intracranial tumor affecting a significant proportion of advanced cancer patients. In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become commonly utilized. It has contributed significantly to decreased toxicity, prolonged quality of life and general improvement in outcomes of patients with brain metastases. Frequent imaging and advanced treatment techniques have allowed for the treatment of more patients with large and numerous metastases extending their overall survival. The addition of targeted therapy and immunotherapy to SRS has introduced novel treatment paradigms and has further improved our ability to effectively treat brain lesions. In this review, we examined in detail the available evidence for the use of SRS alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. Given our developing understanding of the importance of primary tumor histology, the use of different treatment strategies for different metastasis is evolving. Combining SRS with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in breast cancer, lung cancer and melanoma as well as the use of preoperative SRS have shown significant promise in recent years and are investigated in multiple ongoing prospective trials. Further research is needed to guide the optimal sequence of therapies and to identify specific patient subgroups that may benefit the most from aggressive, combined treatment approaches.

Single-fraction radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a comparative study

To compare the local control and brain radionecrosis in patients with brain metastasis primarily treated by single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT). Between January 2012 and December 2017, 179 patients with only 1-3 brain metastases (total: 287) primarily treated by SRS (14 Gy) or HFSRT (23.1 Gy in 3 fractions of 7.7 Gy, every other day) were retrospectively analyzed in a single center. Follow-up imaging data were available in 152 patients with 246 lesions. The corresponding Biological Effective Dose (BED) were 33.6 Gy and 40.9 Gy respectively for SRS and HFSRT group, assuming an α/β of 10 Gy. Local control (LC) and risk of radionecrosis (RN) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The actuarial local control rates at 6 and 12 months were 94% and 88.1% in SRS group, and 87.6% and 78.4%, in HFSRT group (p = 0.06), respectively. Only the total volume of edema was associated with worse LC (p = 0.01, HR 1.02, 95% CI [1.004-1.03]) in multivariate analysis. Brain radionecrosis occurred in 1 lesion in SRS group and 9 in HFSRT group. Median time to necrosis was 5.5 months (range 1-9). Only the volume of GTV was associated with RN (p = 0.02, HR 1.09, 95% CI [1.01-1.18]) in multivariate analysis. Multi-fraction SRT dose of 23.31 Gy in 3 fractions has similar efficacy to single-fraction SRT dose of 14 Gy in patients with brain metastases. A slightly higher occurrence of radionecrosis appeared in HFSRT group.

Current approaches to the management of brain metastases

Brain metastases are a very common manifestation of cancer that have historically been approached as a single disease entity given the uniform association with poor clinical outcomes. Fortunately, our understanding of the biology and molecular underpinnings of brain metastases has greatly improved, resulting in more sophisticated prognostic models and multiple patient-related and disease-specific treatment paradigms. In addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded from whole-brain radiotherapy and surgery to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are often used sequentially or in combination. Advances in neuroimaging have provided additional opportunities to accurately screen for intracranial disease at initial cancer diagnosis, target intracranial lesions with precision during treatment and help differentiate the effects of treatment from disease progression by incorporating functional imaging. Given the numerous available treatment options for patients with brain metastases, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to personalize the treatment of each patient in an effort to improve the therapeutic ratio. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for patients with brain metastases, enrolment in clinical trials is essential to advance our understanding of this complex and common disease. In this Review, we describe the key features of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern paradigms in the treatment and management of patients with brain metastases and provide speculation on future research directions.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent lapatinib is associated with improved local control for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

With increasing survival for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer in the trastuzumab era, there is an increased risk of brain metastasis. Therefore, there is interest in optimizing intracranial disease control. Lapatinib is a small-molecule dual HER2/epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor that has demonstrated intracranial activity against HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of lapatinib combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on local control of brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients with HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases who underwent SRS from 1997-2015 were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of local failure following SRS. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis and overall survival.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients with HER2+ breast cancer who underwent SRS to 479 brain metastases (median 5 lesions per patient) were included. Among these, 75 patients had luminal B subtype (hormone receptor-positive, HER2+) and 51 patients had HER2-enriched histology (hormone receptor-negative, HER2+). Forty-seven patients received lapatinib during the course of their disease, of whom 24 received concurrent lapatinib with SRS. The median radiographic follow-up among all patients was 17.1 months. Concurrent lapatinib was associated with reduction in local failure at 12 months (5.7% vs 15.1%, p < 0.01). For lesions in the ≤ 75th percentile by volume, concurrent lapatinib significantly decreased local failure. However, for lesions in the > 75th percentile (> 1.10 cm3), concurrent lapatinib did not significantly improve local failure. Any use of lapatinib after development of brain metastasis improved median survival compared to SRS without lapatinib (27.3 vs 19.5 months, p = 0.03). The 12-month risk of radiation necrosis was consistently lower in the lapatinib cohort compared to the SRS-alone cohort (1.3% vs 6.3%, p < 0.01), despite extended survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases, the use of lapatinib concurrently with SRS improved local control of brain metastases, without an increased rate of radiation necrosis. Concurrent lapatinib best augments the efficacy of SRS for lesions ≤ 1.10 cm3 in volume. In patients who underwent SRS for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases, the use of lapatinib at any time point in the therapy course was associated with a survival benefit. The use of lapatinib combined with radiosurgery warrants further prospective evaluation.

Two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of large brain metastases: Single institution experience and review of literature

Introduction: Two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been shown as an effective treatment for brain metastases that are too large for single fraction SRS. Methods: Patients with large brain metastases (>4 cm³) treated with two-staged SRS from January 2017 to December 2019 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Results: There were 23 brain metastases treated. The normal brain volume receiving equivalent 12Gy-in-single-fraction was defined as V_12E. The V_12E for original single-fraction GKS plan (mean of 41.4 cm³, range 5.6-146.1 cm³) was significantly higher compared to that of the second stage (mean of 23.7 cm³, range 2.8-92.7 cm³). The median tumor volume measured at the second stage (4.30 cm³) was reduced by an average of 52.2% compared to the first stage (9.58 cm³). Three patients (27.3%) showed local tumor progression in 4 tumors (20%). The median time to progression was 152 days. Conclusions: Two-staged SRS is an effective treatment technique for large brain metastasis that results in significant reduction of tumor volume at the second stage SRS. Optimal treatment dose has not yet been defined.

Separating or combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC brain metastases

With the advancement of imaging technology, systemic disease control rate and survival rate, the morbidity of brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been riding on a steady upward trend (40%), but management of BMs from NSCLC remains obscure. Systemic therapy is anticipated to offer novel therapeutic avenues in the management of NSCLC BMs, and radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy have their own advantages. Recently, it was confirmed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and RT could mutually promote the efficacy in the treatment of BMs from NSCLC. In this paper, we provide a review on current understandings and practices of separating or combining ICIs and RT, which could provide a reference for the coming laboratory and clinical studies and contribute to the development of new approaches in NSCLC BMs.

The Relationship Between Tumor Volume and Timing of Post-resection Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Maximize Local Control: A Critical Review

After maximally safe neurosurgical resection of brain metastases, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now recommended as an alternative to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), which has been associated with cognitive decline. One complicating factor associated with SRS is that postoperative cavity dynamics can change dramatically, creating significant variability in the recommended timing of SRS. While SRS has been shown to improve local control (LC) in smaller tumor cavities, achieving excellent LC rates still remains a challenge in larger ones. Furthermore, factors predicting the optimal timing of SRS in relation to the cavity size need to be defined and implemented. Variables such as the delay between postoperative MRI and treatment are critical but poorly understood. One potential treatment option that may improve outcomes is brachytherapy, but the widespread implementation of this technique has been slow. This critical review analyzes the relationship between preoperative tumor volume, resection cavity size, and timing of SRS and explores how these variables must be understood in order to achieve the highest LC possible.

Treatment Optimization for Brain Metastasis from Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis is common in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver gene mutations. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is one of the common driver mutations in NSCLC. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been the research hotspot at present. However, there are relatively few studies specified on the treatment of brain metastasis from ALK gene rearrangement NSCLC. The prognosis of these patients, the role of ALK-TKI, and the proper combination model of ALK-TKI with radiotherapy are worth further exploring. This review focuses on new data on the prognosis of ALK-TKI and the proper combination model of ALK-TKI with radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

According to some retrospective trials, for ALKi-naïve ALK rearrangement NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, crizotinib together with radiotherapy seem to improve intracranial control rate, progression-free survival, and very likely improve overall survival; next-generation ALK-TKIs are now replacing crizotinib as first-line treatment. For patients with central nervous system progression during crizotinib application, combining radiotherapy could improve the local control rate while continuing crizotinib to control systemic disease. Second-/third-generation ALK inhibitors had higher intracranial ORR and DCR even after crizotinib-refractory situations, and they alone had a strong efficacy against intracranial tumors, in which situation radiotherapy might be omitted. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were both local treatment options for brain metastasis, and the preferred choice was hard to make. ALK resistance is complicated with a wide range of molecular changes, and future studies are needed to solve these problems. Anyway, further and larger prospective studied are worth exploring to offer a confirmed preferred choice of drugs and radiation. Key Messages: Next-generation ALK-TKIs are now replacing crizotinib as first-line treatment in ALKi-naïve ALK rearrangement NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, and they alone might have a strong efficacy against intracranial tumors in crizotinib-refractory situations in which occasion radiotherapy might be omitted. SRS and WBRT are both local treatment options for brain metastasis.

Single-Fraction Radiosurgery Using Conservative Doses for Brain Metastases: Durable Responses in Select Primaries With Limited Toxicity

BACKGROUND

Optimal doses for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of brain metastases are not well established. Our institution utilized conservative dosing compared to maximum-tolerated doses from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-05 Phase I study.

OBJECTIVE

To report individual lesion control (LC) from conservative single-fraction doses and determine factors affecting LC.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2015, patients who underwent linear accelerator-based single-fraction SRS for cerebral/cerebellar metastases and receiving at least 1 follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were identified. Lesion response was assessed by a size-based rating system and modified "Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases" (RANO-BM) criteria.

RESULTS

Among 188 patients with 519 lesions, median survival was 13.1 mo; median follow-up time with MRI was 9.6 mo per course. Median tumor-periphery dose was 15 Gy (range: 7.5-20.7). Median lesion volume was 0.5 cc and diameter was 9 mm (range: 2-45). Concordance between RANO-BM and size-based system was 93%. Crude 1-yr LC was 80%, 73%, 56%, and 38% for lesions 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, >31 mm, respectively. On multivariate analysis, increased size, melanoma and colorectal histology, and progression after whole brain radiation therapy predicted worse LC. When excluding lesions treated as a boost, dose was a significant predictor of LC in multivariate models (hazard ratio 0.89, P = .01). Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 10 lesions in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Histology predicts LC after conservative SRS doses with evidence of a dose-response relationship. Conservative single-fraction SRS doses confer minimal toxicity and acceptable control in certain subgroups (breast cancer, <5 mm), with suboptimal control in larger lesions and in combination with whole brain radiation therapy.

Phase I Trial of Radiosurgery Dose Escalation Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains uncertain. SRS has been associated with a high risk of radionecrosis in gliomas.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety of dose escalation of single-fraction radiosurgery for rGBM in the setting of bevacizumab therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective trial to determine the safety and synergistic benefit of higher doses of SRS administered with bevacizumab for rGBM. A single dose of bevacizumab was given prior to SRS and continued until progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was evaluated in successive cohorts of 3 patients.

RESULTS

Seven males and 2 females entered the study. The maximum linear diameter of the enhancing tumor was 2.58 cm (2.04-3.09). Prescription dose was escalated from 18 to 22 Gy. The radiosurgery target was chosen before the first dose of bevacizumab, about 1 wk prior to SRS treatment. Pre-SRS bevacizumab treatment was associated with a reduction of the mean volume of the enhancing lesion from 4.7 to 2.86 cm3 on the day of SRS (P = .103). No patient developed an acute side effect related to SRS treatment. The combination of SRS and bevacizumab resulted in a partial response in 3 patients and stable disease in 6 patients. Median progression-free and overall survival were 7.5 and 13 mo, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of bevacizumab prior to SRS permitted safe prescription dose escalation up to 22 Gy for rGBM. Further evaluation of the efficacy of SRS for rGBM should be performed in the setting of bevacizumab treatment.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Limited (1-4) Brain Metasteses: Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND

Guidelines regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases are missing recently published evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and provide an objective summary of publications regarding SRS in managing patients with 1 to 4 brain metastases.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Medline up to November 2016. A separate search was conducted for SRS for larger brain metastases.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven prospective studies, critical reviews, meta-analyses, and published consensus guidelines were reviewed. Four key points came from these studies. First, there is no detriment to survival by withholding whole brain radiation (WBRT) in the upfront management of brain metastases with SRS. Second, while SRS on its own provides a high rate of local control (LC), WBRT may provide further increase in LC. Next, WBRT does provide distant brain control with less need for salvage therapy. Finally, the addition of WBRT does affect neurocognitive function and quality of life more than SRS alone. For larger brain metastases, surgical resection should be considered, especially when factoring lower LC with single-session radiosurgery. There is emerging data showing good LC and/or decreased toxicity with multisession radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

A number of well-conducted prospective and meta-analyses studies demonstrate good LC, without compromising survival, using SRS alone for patients with a limited number of brain metastases. Some also demonstrated less impact on neurocognitive function with SRS alone. Practice guidelines were developed using these data with International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society consensus.

Two-session Radiosurgery as Initial Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Large, Symptomatic Brain Metastases from Breast and Lung Histology

Introduction

Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for patients with large, symptomatic brain metastases. This report describes a series of patients treated with upfront two-session radiosurgery rather than surgery for large brain metastases from breast and lung histology.

Methods

From October 2016 to January 2019, 10 consecutive patients with neurologic symptoms from large brain metastases producing mass effects underwent two sessions of radiosurgical treatments 30 days apart. The response was assessed by imaging and clinical evaluations. 

Results

Ten patients had a total of 36 tumors; of these, 22 lesions with a mean volume of 12.3 ml (range, 7-78.4 ml) underwent two-session radiosurgery. The mean prescription dose for the first treatment was 13 Gy (range, 9-18 Gy) to the 50% isodose line, and the intratumoral mean dose was 17.9 Gy (12-22.9). All 10 patients had neurological symptoms, with a mean Karnofsky physical score (KPS) of 60 (range, 50-70) on the day of treatment. None of these patients required neurosurgical or emergency consultation related to worsening of neurological symptoms between the first and second treatments. At 30 days, the mean KPS was 80 and maintained at 80 at the last follow-up (range, 60-100; P=0.002), and mean lesion volume was 4.1 ml (range, 1.3-70 ml). The mean prescription dose for the second treatment was 12 Gy (range, 9-18 Gy) to the 50% isodose line, and the intratumoral mean dose was 17.9 Gy (11-22.4). The mean overall survival was 24 months (range, 3-32 months). At last follow-up, three patients (30%) had died, two of systemic progression and one of tumor progression, and at one year, local tumor control was 91% and 19 (86%) lesions showed documented local control at last follow up. In those tumors that progressed, the mean time to progression was eight months (range, 5-20 months), and the mean time to surgery was nine months (range, 5-32 months).

Conclusion

Two-session radiosurgery proved to be a safe treatment for patients with large, symptomatic metastases in this series. Neurological worsening after radiosurgery for large lesions of breast and lung histology may be an infrequent event. This strategy in radiosurgery may have neurological benefits for these patients providing adequate local tumor control while reducing the need of upfront surgery at diagnosis.

Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery on the Gamma Knife Icon: Early Experience From 100 Patients

BACKGROUND

The Gamma Knife (GK) Icon (Elekta AB) uses a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner and an infrared camera system to support the delivery of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). There are limited data on patients treated with frameless GK radiosurgery (GKRS).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the early experience, process, technical details, and short-term outcomes with frameless GKRS at our institution.

METHODS

We reviewed our patient selection and described the workflow in detail, including image acquisition, treatment planning, mask-based immobilization, stereotactic CBCT localization, registration, treatment, and intrafraction monitoring. Because of the short interval of follow-up, we provide crude rates of local control.

RESULTS

Data from 100 patients are reported. Median age is 67 yr old. 56 patients were treated definitively, 21 postoperatively, and 23 had salvage GKRS for recurrence after surgery. Forty-two patients had brain metastases, 26 meningiomas, 16 vestibular schwannomas, 9 high-grade gliomas, and 7 other histologies. Median doses to metastases were 20 Gy in 1 fraction (range: 14-21), 24 Gy in 3 fractions (range: 19.5-27), and 25 Gy in 5 fractions (range: 25-30 Gy). Thirteen patients underwent repeat SRS to the same area. Median treatment time was 17.7 min (range: 5.8-61.7). We found an improvement in our workflow and a greater number of patients eligible for GKRS because of the ability to fractionate treatments.

CONCLUSION

We report a large cohort of consecutive patients treated with frameless GKRS. We look forward to studies with longer follow-up to provide valuable data on clinical outcomes and to further our understanding of the radiobiology of hypofractionation in the brain.

Single-Session versus Multisession Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) in patients with large brain metastases by comparing single-session radiosurgery (S-GKS) and multisession radiosurgery (M-GKS), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent GKS for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2016, 66 patients with 74 lesions ≥10 cm3 from large brain metastases from only NSCLC were included. Fifty-five patients with 60 lesions were treated with S-GKS; 11 patients with 14 lesions were treated with M-GKS. Median doses were 16 Gy (range, 11-18 Gy) for the S-GKS group and 8 Gy (range, 7-10 Gy) in three fractions for the M-GKS group.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up period of 13.1 months (range, 1.3-76.4 months), the median survival duration was 21.1 months for all patients. Median tumor volume was 14.3 cm3 (range, 10.0-58.3 cm3). The local control rate was 77.0% and the progression-free survival rate was 73.6% at the last follow-up. There were no significant between-group differences in terms of local control rate (p = 0.10). Compared with S-GKS, M-GKS did not differ significantly in radiation-induced complications (38.1 vs. 45.4%, p =0.83). While 8 patients who underwent S-GKS experienced major complications of grade ≥3, no toxicity was observed in patients treated with M-GKS.

CONCLUSIONS

M-GKS may be an effective alternative for large brain metastases from NSCLC. Specifically, severe radiation-induced toxicity (≥grade 3) did not occur in M-GKS for large-volume metastases. Although the long-term effects and results from larger samples remain unclear, M-GKS may be a suitable palliative treatment for preserving neurological function.

Clinical outcomes of hypofractionated image-guided multifocal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy for brain metastases

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can be used to design hypofractionated radiotherapy treatment plans for multiple brain metastases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes of hypofractionated image-guided multifocal irradiation using VMAT (HFIGMI-VMAT) for brain metastases. From July 2012 to December 2016, 67 consecutive patients with 601 brain metastases were treated with HFIGMI-VMAT at our institution. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy to a 95% volume of the planning target volume in 10 fractions. Fifty-five of the 67 patients had non-small-cell lung cancer, and the remaining 12 had other types of cancer. The median number of brain metastases was five, and the median maximum diameter was 1.2 cm. The median duration of follow-up was 12.0 months (range, 1.9-44.8 months), and the median survival time 18.7 months. Four patients with six lesions had local recurrences. The local control rate in the 64 assessed patients was 98.4% and 95.3% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (three died before assessment). The local control rate for the 572 assessed lesions was 99.8% and 99.3% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Thirty-nine patients developed distant brain metastases, the distant brain control rate being 59.7% and 40.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Acute toxicities were generally mild (Grade 1-2). Three patients (4.5%) developed radiation necrosis requiring corticosteroid therapy. The HFIGMI-VMAT technique with flat dose delivery was well tolerated and achieved excellent local control. This technique is a promising treatment option for patients with multiple and large brain metastases.

Les métastases cérébrales de cancer du rein, un défi clinique

BRAIN METASTASES IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMA, AN UNMET NEED

Brain metastases from renal cell carcinomas are associated with dismal prognosis and might be present in up to 10 % of metastatic patients. Biologically, the blood brain barrier might be disrupted in brain metastases and thus do not exclusively account for treatment resistance. Brain metastases often acquire additional molecular alterations that might provide aggressive features. They are also associated with high lymphocytic infiltration and expression of immune checkpoints PD-1/PD-L1. In clinical routine, scores based on metastatic volume and patients' performance status might help better predict survival. The cornerstone of brain metastases treatment is stereotactic radiation therapy if patients are eligible, while systemic treatments such as antiangiogenics and immune checkpoint inhibitors only provide limited disease control. Early identification of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinomas and promotion of dedicated clinical trials will be important to try and improve current clinical management.