1
|
Layer JP, Shiban E, Brehmer S, Diehl CD, de Castro DG, Hamed M, Dejonckheere CS, Cifarelli DT, Friker LL, Herrlinger U, Hölzel M, Vatter H, Schneider M, Combs SE, Schmeel LC, Cifarelli CP, Giordano FA, Sarria GR, Kahl KH. Multicentric Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combinatorial Adjuvant Brain Metastasis Treatment by Intraoperative Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1552-1562. [PMID: 38199383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE After surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) provides a promising alternative to adjuvant external beam radiation therapy by enabling superior organ-at-risk preservation, reduction of in-hospital times, and timely admission to subsequent systemic treatments, which increasingly comprise novel targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of IORT in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other targeted therapies (TTs). METHODS AND MATERIALS In a multicentric approach incorporating individual patient data from 6 international IORT centers, all patients with BMs undergoing IORT were retrospectively assessed for combinatorial treatment with ICIs/TTs and evaluated for toxicity and cumulative rates, including wound dehiscence, radiation necrosis, leptomeningeal spread, local control, distant brain progression (DBP), and estimated overall survival. RESULTS In total, 103 lesions with a median diameter of 34 mm receiving IORT combined with immunomodulatory systemic treatment or other TTs were included. The median follow-up was 13.2 (range, 1.2-102.4) months, and the median IORT dose was 25 (range, 18-30) Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. There was 1 grade 3 adverse event related to IORT recorded (2.2%). A 4.9% cumulative radiation necrosis rate was observed. The 1-year local control rate was 98.0%, and the 1-year DBP-free survival rate was 60.0%. Median time to DBP was 5.5 (range, 1.0-18.5) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing DBP, and the cumulative leptomeningeal spread rate was 4.9%. The median estimated overall survival was 26 (range, 1.2 to not reached) months with a 1-year survival rate of 74.0%. Early initiation of immunotherapy/TTs was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward improved DBP rate and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The combination of ICIs/TTs with IORT for resected BMs does not seem to increase toxicity and yields encouraging local control outcomes in the difficult-to-treat subgroup of larger BMs. Time gaps between surgery and systemic treatment could be shortened or avoided. The definitive role of IORT in local control after BM resection will be defined in a prospective trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Lea L Friker
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Hölzel
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute of the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute of Intelligent Systems in Medicine (MIISM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niranjan A, Faramand A, Raju SS, Lee CC, Yang HC, Nabeel AM, Tawadros SR, El-Shehaby AMN, Abdelkarim K, Emad RM, Reda WA, Álvarez RM, Moreno NEM, Liscak R, May J, Mathieu D, Langlois AM, Snyder MH, Shepard MJ, Sheehan J, Muhsen BA, Borghei-Razavi H, Barnett G, Kondziolka D, Golfinos JG, Attuati L, Picozzi P, McInerney J, Daggubati LC, Warnick RE, Feliciano CE, Carro E, McCarthy D, Starke RM, Landy HJ, Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Flickinger J, Lunsford LD. Clinical and Imaging Outcomes After Trigeminal Schwannoma Radiosurgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort Study. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:165-173. [PMID: 37523519 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES An international, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and tumor control rates after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for trigeminal schwannoma. METHODS Patient data (N = 309) were collected from 14 international radiosurgery centers. The median patient age was 50 years (range 11-87 years). Sixty patients (19%) had prior resections. Abnormal facial sensation was the commonest complaint (49%). The anatomic locations were root (N = 40), ganglion (N = 141), or dumbbell type (N = 128). The median tumor volume was 4 cc (range, 0.2-30.1 cc), and median margin dose was 13 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy). Factors associated with tumor control, symptom improvement, and adverse radiation events were assessed. RESULTS The median and mean time to last follow-up was 49 and 65 months (range 6-242 months). Greater than 5-year follow-up was available for 139 patients (45%), and 50 patients (16%) had longer than 10-year follow-up. The overall tumor control rate was 94.5%. Tumors regressed in 146 patients (47.2%), remained unchanged in 128 patients (41.4%), and stabilized after initial expansion in 20 patients (6.5%). Progression-free survival rates at 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years were 91%, 86%, and 80 %. Smaller tumor volume (less than 8 cc) was associated with significantly better progression-free survival ( P = .02). Seventeen patients with sustained growth underwent further intervention at a median of 27 months (3-144 months). Symptom improvement was noted in 140 patients (45%) at a median of 7 months. In multivariate analysis primary, SRS ( P = .003) and smaller tumor volume ( P = .01) were associated with better symptom improvement. Adverse radiation events were documented in 29 patients (9%). CONCLUSION SRS was associated with long-term freedom (10 year) from additional management in 80% of patients. SRS proved to be a valuable salvage option after resection. When used as a primary management for smaller volume tumors, both clinical improvement and prevention of new deficits were optimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Andrew Faramand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Sudesh S Raju
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei , Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei , Taiwan
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Cairo , Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Qalubya , Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Cairo , Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Cairo , Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Cairo , Egypt
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Cairo , Egypt
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Cairo , Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | | | | | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir May
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke , Québec , Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke , Québec , Canada
| | - M Harrison Snyder
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Baha'eddin A Muhsen
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Hamid Borghei-Razavi
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Gene Barnett
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Medical Physics, NYU Langone Health System, New York , New York , USA
| | - John G Golfinos
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Medical Physics, NYU Langone Health System, New York , New York , USA
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan , Italy
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan , Italy
| | - James McInerney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Lekhaj Chand Daggubati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| | - Caleb E Feliciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center of Puerto Rico, San Juan , Puerto Rico
| | - Eric Carro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center of Puerto Rico, San Juan , Puerto Rico
| | - David McCarthy
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Miami, Coral Gables , Florida , USA
| | - Robert M Starke
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Miami, Coral Gables , Florida , USA
| | - Howard J Landy
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Miami, Coral Gables , Florida , USA
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown , West Virginia , USA
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown , West Virginia , USA
| | - John Flickinger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Dumot C, Dayawansa S, Liscak R, May J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Martínez Moreno N, Martinez Álvarez R, Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Srinivasan P, Tang LW, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdel Karim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad Eldin RM, Elazzazi AH, Peker S, Samanci Y, Padmanaban V, Jareczek FJ, McInerney J, Cockroft KM, Mathieu D, Aldakhil S, Alzate JD, Kondziolka D, Tripathi M, Palmer JD, Upadhyay R, Lin M, Zada G, Yu C, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Shaaban A, Xu Z, Sheehan JP. Effect of cerebral arteriovenous malformation location on outcomes of repeat, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: a matched-cohort analysis. J Neurosurg 2023:1-9. [PMID: 38134430 DOI: 10.3171/2023.10.jns231957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with deep-seated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have a higher rate of unfavorable outcome and lower rate of nidus obliteration after primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the effect of AVM location on repeat SRS outcomes. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study involved 505 AVM patients managed with repeat, single-session SRS. The endpoints were nidus obliteration, hemorrhage in the latency period, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Patients were split on the basis of AVM location into the deep (brainstem, basal ganglia, thalamus, deep cerebellum, and corpus callosum) and superficial cohorts. The cohorts were matched 1:1 on the basis of the covariate balancing score for volume, eloquence of location, and prescription dose. RESULTS After matching, 149 patients remained in each cohort. The 5-year cumulative probability rates for favorable outcome (probability difference -18%, 95% CI -30.9 to -5.8%, p = 0.004) and AVM obliteration (probability difference -18%, 95% CI -30.1% to -6.4%, p = 0.007) were significantly lower in the deep AVM cohort. No significant differences were observed in the 5-year cumulative probability rates for hemorrhage (probability difference 3%, 95% CI -2.4% to 8.5%, p = 0.28) or RICs (probability difference 1%, 95% CI -10.6% to 11.7%, p = 0.92). The median time to delayed cyst formation was longer with deep-seated AVMs (deep 62 months vs superficial 12 months, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS AVMs located in deep regions had significantly lower favorable outcomes and obliteration rates compared with superficial lesions after repeat SRS. Although the rates of hemorrhage in the latency period and RICs in the two cohorts were comparable, delayed cyst formation occurred later in patients with deep-seated AVMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Chloe Dumot
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Sam Dayawansa
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Roman Liscak
- 3Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir May
- 3Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 5School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 5School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Lilly W Tang
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- 8Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- 9Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- 8Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- 9Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- 8Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- 10Neurosurgery Department and
| | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- 8Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- 21Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- 8Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- 10Neurosurgery Department and
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- 8Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- 11Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Selcuk Peker
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Varun Padmanaban
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Francis J Jareczek
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - James McInerney
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin M Cockroft
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - David Mathieu
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Salman Aldakhil
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | | | - Manjul Tripathi
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- 17Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- 17Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Michelle Lin
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Gabriel Zada
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Cheng Yu
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | | | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- 20Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ahmed Shaaban
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Sener U, Cifarelli DT, Scoville D, Dabir A. Intracranial intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT): evaluation of electrocorticography and peri-operative seizure risk. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:423-430. [PMID: 37668944 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04443-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) for brain metastases (BMs) and primary brain tumors has emerged as an adjuvant radiation modality that allows for consolidation of care into a single anesthetic episode with surgical resection. Yet, there is a paucity of data regarding the impact that IORT may have on peri-operative and long-term seizure risk. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients receiving IORT during tumor resection was performed via registry including data regarding peri-operative anti-seizure medications and anesthetic agents. Intra-operative neuromonitoring was performed using electrocorticography (ECoG) captured before-, during-, and after-IORT then analyzed for evidence of seizure or significant baseline changes. Kaplan-Meir estimations were used for overall survival analysis relative to documented clinical seizure incidence post-IORT. RESULTS Of the 24 consecutive patients treated with IORT during tumor resection included, 18 (75%) patients were diagnosed with BMs while 6 (25%) had newly-diagnosed glioblastoma. Mean and median survival times were 487 and 372 days, respectively. Clinical seizures occurred in 3 patients post-IORT, 2 BMs patients within 9 months and 1 glioblastoma patient at 14 months. IORT time represented 9.5% of anesthetic time. ECoG recordings were available for 5 patients (4 BMs; 1 glioblastoma), with mean recording durations of 13% of the total anesthetic time and no evidence of high-frequency oscillations or seizure activity. CONCLUSIONS IORT is an option for delivery of definitive radiation in surgically resected brain tumors without increasing the peri-operative or long-term risk of seizure. ECoG data during the delivery of radiation fail to demonstrate any electrophysiological changes in response to ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9183, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9183, USA
| | - David Scoville
- Division of Surgical Services, WVU Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Aman Dabir
- Department of Neurology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rusthoven CG, Staley AW, Gao D, Yomo S, Bernhardt D, Wandrey N, El Shafie R, Kraemer A, Padilla O, Chiang V, Faramand AM, Palmer JD, Zacharia BE, Wegner RE, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Levy A, Bernstein K, Mathieu D, Cagney DN, Chan MD, Grills IS, Braunstein S, Lee CC, Sheehan JP, Kluwe C, Patel S, Halasz LM, Andratschke N, Deibert CP, Verma V, Trifiletti DM, Cifarelli CP, Debus J, Combs SE, Sato Y, Higuchi Y, Aoyagi K, Brown PD, Alami V, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Camidge DR, Kavanagh BD, Robin TP, Serizawa T, Yamamoto M. Comparison of first-line radiosurgery for small-cell and non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (CROSS-FIRE). J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:926-936. [PMID: 37142267 PMCID: PMC10407696 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Historical reservations regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases include concerns for short-interval and diffuse central nervous system (CNS) progression, poor prognoses, and increased neurological mortality specific to SCLC histology. We compared SRS outcomes for SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where SRS is well established. METHODS Multicenter first-line SRS outcomes for SCLC and NSCLC from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively collected (n = 892 SCLC, n = 4785 NSCLC). Data from the prospective Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society (JLGK0901) clinical trial of first-line SRS were analyzed as a comparison cohort (n = 98 SCLC, n = 814 NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard and Fine-Gray models, respectively, with multivariable adjustment for cofactors including age, sex, performance status, year, extracranial disease status, and brain metastasis number and volume. Mutation-stratified analyses were performed in propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive NSCLC, mutation-negative NSCLC, and SCLC. RESULTS OS was superior for patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset (median OS = 10.5 vs 8.6 months; P < .001) and in the JLGK0901 dataset. Hazard estimates for first CNS progression favoring NSCLC were similar in both datasets but reached statistical significance in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.73 to 0.92, P = .001). In the propensity score-matched cohorts, there were continued OS advantages for NSCLC patients (median OS = 23.7 [EGFR and ALK positive NSCLC] vs 13.6 [mutation-negative NSCLC] vs 10.4 months [SCLC], pairwise P values < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences in CNS progression were observed in the matched cohorts. Neurological mortality and number of lesions at CNS progression were similar for NSCLC and SCLC patients. Leptomeningeal progression was increased in patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.26, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS After SRS, SCLC histology was associated with shorter OS compared to NSCLC. CNS progression occurred earlier in SCLC patients overall but was similar in patients matched on baseline factors. SCLC was not associated with increased neurological mortality, number of lesions at CNS progression, or leptomeningeal progression compared to NSCLC. These findings may better inform clinical expectations and individualized decision making regarding SRS for SCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alyse W Staley
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Dexiang Gao
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Narine Wandrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rami El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anna Kraemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oscar Padilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Andrew M Faramand
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Université Paris Saclay, France
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel N Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Christien Kluwe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), The University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Yasunori Sato
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kyoko Aoyagi
- Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vida Alami
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tyler P Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Dumot C, Dayawansa S, Liščák R, May J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Martinez Moreno N, Martinez Álvarez R, Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Srinivasan P, Tang LW, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad RM, Hesham Elazzazi A, Peker S, Samanci Y, Padmanaban V, Jareczek FJ, McInerney J, Cockroft KM, Mathieu D, Aldakhil S, Alzate JD, Kondziolka D, Tripathi M, Palmer JD, Upadhyay R, Lin M, Zada G, Yu C, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Xu Z, Sheehan JP. Outcome Evaluation of Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations. Stroke 2023. [PMID: 37350270 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.123.042515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are limited by small patient numbers and single-institution biases. The purpose of this study was to provide the combined experience of multiple centers, in an effort to fully define the role of repeat SRS for patients with arteriovenous malformation. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients treated with repeat, single-fraction SRS between 1987 and 2022. Follow-up began at repeat SRS. The primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as a composite of nidus obliteration in the absence of hemorrhage or radiation-induced neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were obliteration, hemorrhage risk, and symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Competing risk analysis was performed to compute yearly rates and identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS The cohort comprised 505 patients (254 [50.3%] males; median [interquartile range] age, 34 [15] years) from 14 centers. The median clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up was 52 (interquartile range, 61) and 47 (interquartile range, 52) months, respectively. At last follow-up, favorable outcome was achieved by 268 (53.1%) patients (5-year probability, 50% [95% CI, 45%-55%]) and obliteration by 300 (59.4%) patients (5-year probability, 56% [95% CI, 51%-61%]). Twenty-eight patients (5.6%) experienced post-SRS hemorrhage with an annual incidence rate of 1.38 per 100 patient-years. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes were evident in 28 (5.6%) patients, with most occurring in the first 3 years. Larger nidus volumes (between 2 and 4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.86]; P=0.005; >4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.7]; P<0.001) and brainstem/basal ganglia involvement (subdistribution hazard, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.45-0.81]; P<0.001) were associated with reduced probability of favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS Repeat SRS confers reasonable obliteration rates with a low complication risk. With most complications occurring in the first 3 years, extending the latency period to 5 years generally increases the rate of favorable patient outcomes and reduces the necessity of a third intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (G.M., S. Pikis, C.D., S.D., Z.X., J.P.S.)
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (G.M., S. Pikis, C.D., S.D., Z.X., J.P.S.)
| | - Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (G.M., S. Pikis, C.D., S.D., Z.X., J.P.S.)
| | - Samantha Dayawansa
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (G.M., S. Pikis, C.D., S.D., Z.X., J.P.S.)
| | - Roman Liščák
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic (R.L., J.M.)
| | - Jaromir May
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic (R.L., J.M.)
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan (C.-c.L., H.-c.Y.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan (C.-c.L., H.-c.Y.)
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan (C.-c.L., H.-c.Y.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan (C.-c.L., H.-c.Y.)
| | | | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA (R.D.L., A.N., Z.W., P.S., L.W.T.)
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA (R.D.L., A.N., Z.W., P.S., L.W.T.)
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA (R.D.L., A.N., Z.W., P.S., L.W.T.)
| | - Priyanka Srinivasan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA (R.D.L., A.N., Z.W., P.S., L.W.T.)
| | - Lilly W Tang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA (R.D.L., A.N., Z.W., P.S., L.W.T.)
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R., S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., R.M.E.)
- Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R.)
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R., S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., R.M.E.)
- Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R.)
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R., S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., R.M.E.)
- Neurosurgery Department and Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt (S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., A.H.E.)
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R., S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., R.M.E.)
- Neurosurgery Department and Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt (S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., A.H.E.)
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R., S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., R.M.E.)
- Neurosurgery Department and Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt (S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., A.H.E.)
| | - Reem M Emad
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt (A.M.N., W.A.R., S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., R.M.E.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt (R.M.E.)
| | - Ahmed Hesham Elazzazi
- Neurosurgery Department and Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt (S.R.T., K.A., A.M.N.E.-S., A.H.E.)
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (S. Peker, Y.S.)
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (S. Peker, Y.S.)
| | - Varun Padmanaban
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (V.P., F.J.J., J.M., K.M.C.)
| | - Francis J Jareczek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (V.P., F.J.J., J.M., K.M.C.)
| | - James McInerney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (V.P., F.J.J., J.M., K.M.C.)
| | - Kevin M Cockroft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (V.P., F.J.J., J.M., K.M.C.)
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada (D.M., S.A.)
| | - Salman Aldakhil
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada (D.M., S.A.)
| | | | | | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (M.T.)
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center Ohio State University, Columbus (J.D.P., R.U.)
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center Ohio State University, Columbus (J.D.P., R.U.)
| | - Michelle Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California (M.L., G.Z., C.Y.)
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California (M.L., G.Z., C.Y.)
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California (M.L., G.Z., C.Y.)
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown (C.P.C., D.T.C.)
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown (C.P.C., D.T.C.)
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (G.M., S. Pikis, C.D., S.D., Z.X., J.P.S.)
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (G.M., S. Pikis, C.D., S.D., Z.X., J.P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sheehan J, Cifarelli CP, Fadul C. Contemporary care for brain metastasis patients: multidisciplinary approaches and the role of prospective national registries. J Neurooncol 2023:10.1007/s11060-023-04350-2. [PMID: 37227650 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04350-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| | | | - Camilo Fadul
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cifarelli CP, Sheehan JP. Large language model artificial intelligence: the current state and future of ChatGPT in neuro-oncology publishing. J Neurooncol 2023:10.1007/s11060-023-04336-0. [PMID: 37209289 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
|
9
|
Bin-Alamer O, Faramand A, Alarifi NA, Wei Z, Mallela AN, Lu VM, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AM, Emad RM, Peker S, Samanci Y, Lee CC, Yang HC, Delabar V, Mathieu D, Tripathi M, Kearns KN, Bunevicius A, Sheehan JP, Chytka T, Liscak R, Moreno NM, Álvarez RM, Grills IS, Parzen JS, Cifarelli CP, Rehman AA, Speckter H, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Abou-Al-Shaar H. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Case Series of Response and Malignant Transformation Risk. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:934-944. [PMID: 36861994 PMCID: PMC10079356 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) related to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) are challenging tumors. The increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) necessitates further investigations of its role and safety. OBJECTIVE To evaluate tumor control, freedom from additional treatment (FFAT), serviceable hearing preservation, and radiation-related risks of patients with NF2 after SRS for VS. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of 267 patients with NF2 (328 VSs) who underwent single-session SRS at 12 centers participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. The median patient age was 31 years (IQR, 21-45 years), and 52% were male. RESULTS A total of 328 tumors underwent SRS during a median follow-up time of 59 months (IQR, 23-112 months). At 10 and 15 years, the tumor control rates were 77% (95% CI: 69%-84%) and 52% (95% CI: 40%-64%), respectively, and the FFAT rate were 85% (95% CI: 79%-90%) and 75% (95% CI: 65%-86%), respectively. At 5 and 10 years, the serviceable hearing preservation rates were 64% (95% CI: 55%-75%) and 35% (95% CI: 25%-54%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, age (hazards ratio: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05]; P = .02) and bilateral VSs (hazards ratio: 4.56 [95% CI: 1.05-19.78]; P = .04) were predictors for serviceable hearing loss. Neither radiation-induced tumors nor malignant transformation were encountered in this cohort. CONCLUSION Although the absolute volumetric tumor progression rate was 48% at 15 years, the rate of FFAT related to VS was 75% at 15 years after SRS. None of the patients with NF2-related VS developed a new radiation-related neoplasm or malignant transformation after SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Bin-Alamer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew Faramand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Norah A. Alarifi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arka N. Mallela
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Victor M. Lu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ahmed M. Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Wael A. Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R. Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M.N. El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M. Emad
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cheng-chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Violaine Delabar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Kathryn Nicole Kearns
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Adomas Bunevicius
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Inga S. Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Jacob S. Parzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Azeem A. Rehman
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Radiology, Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Radiology Department, Cedimat, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L. Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Kormath Anand R, Nabeel AM, Sheehan D, Sheehan K, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad Eldin R, Peker S, Samanci Y, Kaisman-Elbaz T, Speckter H, Hernández W, Isidor J, Tripathi M, Madan R, Zacharia BE, Daggubati LC, Martínez Moreno N, Martínez Álvarez R, Langlois AM, Mathieu D, Deibert CP, Sudhakar VR, Cifarelli CP, Arteaga Icaza D, Cifarelli DT, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Barnett GH, Lunsford LD, Bowden GN, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma: a multi-institutional study. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:405-412. [PMID: 36303474 DOI: 10.3171/2022.4.jns22203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Though stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established safe treatment for small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs), its role in the management of Koos grade IV VS is still unclear. In this retrospective multicenter study, the authors evaluated tumor control and the patient outcomes of primary, single-session SRS treatment for Koos grade IV VS. METHODS This study included patients treated with primary, single-session SRS for Koos grade IV VS at 10 participating centers. Only those patients presenting with non-life-threatening or incapacitating symptoms and at least 12 months of clinical and neuroimaging follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Relevant data were collected, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform time-dependent analysis for post-SRS tumor control, hearing preservation, and facial nerve function preservation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for outcome measures using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Six hundred twenty-seven patients (344 females, median patient age 54 [IQR 22] years) treated with primary SRS were included in this study. The median tumor volume was 8.7 (IQR 5) cm3. Before SRS, serviceable hearing, facial nerve weakness (House-Brackmann grade > I), and trigeminal neuropathy were present in 205 (33%), 48 (7.7%), and 203 (32.4%) patients, respectively. The median prescription dose was 12 (IQR 1) Gy. At a median radiological follow-up of 38 (IQR 54) months, tumor control was achieved in 94.1% of patients. Early tumor expansion occurred in 67 (10.7%) patients and was associated with a loss of tumor control at the last follow-up (p = 0.001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups were 65% and 44.6%, respectively. Gardner-Robertson class > 1 (p = 0.003) and cochlear dose ≥ 4 Gy (p = 0.02) were risk factors for hearing loss. Facial nerve function deterioration occurred in 19 (3.0%) patients at the last follow-up and was associated with margin doses ≥ 13 Gy (p = 0.03) and early tumor expansion (p = 0.04). Post-SRS, 33 patients developed hydrocephalus requiring shunting. Adverse radiation effects occurred in 92 patients and were managed medically or surgically in 34 and 18 cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SRS is a safe and effective method of obtaining tumor control in patients with Koos grade IV VS presenting with non-life-threatening or debilitating symptoms, especially those with surgical comorbidities that contraindicate resection. To decrease the incidence of post-SRS facial palsy, a prescription dose < 13 Gy is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Pikis
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Rithika Kormath Anand
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo.,3Nasser Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, Benha University, Qalubya
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Wael A Reda
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo.,Departments of4Neurosurgery and
| | | | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo.,5Clinical Oncology, Ain Shams University, Cairo
| | | | - Reem Emad Eldin
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo.,6Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Selcuk Peker
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz
- 8Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Herwin Speckter
- 9Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernández
- 9Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Julio Isidor
- 9Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | | | - Renu Madan
- 11Radiation Therapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Lekhaj C Daggubati
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- 14Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 14Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Vivek R Sudhakar
- 15Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Departments of16Neurosurgery and.,17Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | | | | | - Zhishuo Wei
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Gene H Barnett
- 8Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Greg N Bowden
- 19Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sheehan J, Trifiletti DM, Cifarelli CP. Stereotactic radiosurgery and multidisciplinary care in neuro-oncology. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:655-656. [PMID: 36695973 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04245-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dumot C, Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Xu Z, Dayawansa S, Anand RK, Nabeel AM, Sheehan D, Sheehan K, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Karim KA, El-Shehaby AMN, Eldin RME, Peker S, Samanci Y, Kaisman-Elbaz T, Speckter H, Hernández W, Isidor J, Tripathi M, Madan R, Zacharia BE, Daggubati LC, Moreno NM, Álvarez RM, Langlois AM, Mathieu D, Deibert CP, Sudhakar VR, Cifarelli CP, Icaza DA, Cifarelli DT, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Barnett GH, Lunsford LD, Bowden GN, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma in patients ≥ 65 years old: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:211-220. [PMID: 36543963 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05454-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is the preferred treatment for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Good tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes were described in selected Koos IV VS after single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but outcomes in elderly patients have never been specifically studied. The aim of this study is to report clinical and radiological outcomes after single-session SRS for Koos IV VS in patients ≥ 65 years old. METHOD This multicenter, retrospective study included patients ≥ 65 years old, treated with primary, single-session SRS for a Koos IV VS, and at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients with life-threatening or incapacitating symptoms were excluded. Tumor control rate, hearing, trigeminal, and facial nerve function were studied at last follow-up. RESULTS One-hundred and fifty patients (median age of 71.0 (IQR 9.0) years old with a median tumor volume of 8.3 cc (IQR 4.4)) were included. The median prescription dose was 12.0 Gy (IQR 1.4). The local tumor control rate was 96.0% and 86.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Early tumor expansion occurred in 6.7% and was symptomatic in 40% of cases. A serviceable hearing was present in 16.1% prior to SRS and in 7.4% at a last follow-up of 46.5 months (IQR 55.8). The actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rate was 69.3% and 50.9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Facial nerve function preservation or improvement rates at 5 and 10 years were 98.7% and 91.0%, respectively. At last follow-up, the trigeminal nerve function was improved in 14.0%, stable in 80.7%, and worsened in 5.3% of the patients. ARE were noted in 12.7%. New hydrocephalus was seen in 8.0% of patients. CONCLUSION SRS can be a safe alternative to surgery for selected Koos IV VS in patients ≥ 65 years old. Further follow-up is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Sam Dayawansa
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Rithika Kormath Anand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medecine, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Departments of Neurosurgery and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medeine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Departments of Neurosurgery and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medeine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Departments of Neurosurgery and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medeine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Departments of Neurosurgery and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medeine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Radiology and Dominican Gamma Knife Center, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernández
- Department of Radiology and Dominican Gamma Knife Center, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Julio Isidor
- Department of Radiology and Dominican Gamma Knife Center, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Therapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Renu Madan
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Therapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Lekhaj C Daggubati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Nuria Martínez Moreno
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Vivek R Sudhakar
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Denisse Arteaga Icaza
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Greg N Bowden
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Leet Street, P.O. Box 800742, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0742, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dumot C, Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Xu Z, Anand RK, Nabeel AM, Sheehan D, Sheehan K, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdel Karim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad Eldin RM, Peker S, Samanci Y, Kaisman-Elbaz T, Speckter H, Hernández W, Isidor J, Tripathi M, Madan R, Zacharia BE, Daggubati LC, Moreno NM, Álvarez RM, Langlois AM, Mathieu D, Deibert CP, Sudhakar VR, Cifarelli CP, Icaza DA, Cifarelli DT, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Barnett GH, Lunsford LD, Bowden GN, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma in young patients: a multi-institutional study. J Neurooncol 2022; 160:201-208. [PMID: 36166113 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04134-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgery is the treatment of choice for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been suggested as an alternative to resection in selected patients. However, the safety and efficacy of SRS in Koos grade IV patients ≤ 45 years old has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of Koos grade IV in young patient managed with a single-session SRS. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter analysis included SRS-treated patients, ≤ 45 years old presenting with non-life threatening or incapacitating symptoms due to a Koos Grade IV VS and with follow-up ≥ 12 months. Tumor control and neurological outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS 176 patients [median age of 36.0 (IQR 9) and median tumor volume of 9.3 cm3 (IQR 4.7)] were included. The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (IQR 0.5). Median follow-up period was 37.5 (IQR 53.5) months. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival was 90.9% and 86.7%. Early tumor enlargement occurred in 10.9% of cases and was associated with tumor progression at the last follow-up. The probability of serviceable hearing preservation at 5- and 10-years was 56.8% and 45.2%, respectively. The probability of improvement or preservation of facial nerve function was 95.7% at 5 and 10-years. Adverse radiation effects were noted in 19.9%. New-onset hydrocephalus occurred in 4.0%. CONCLUSION Single-session SRS is a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection in selected patients ≤ 45 years old particularly those with medical co-morbidities and those who decline resection. Longer term follow up is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Rithika Kormath Anand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medecine, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medecine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medecine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medecine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medecine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.,Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernández
- Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Julio Isidor
- Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Renu Madan
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Lekhaj C Daggubati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Vivek R Sudhakar
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Greg N Bowden
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruiz-Garcia H, Trifiletti DM, Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liscak R, Tripathi M, Arsanious D, Cifarelli CP, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Speckter H, Mehta GU, Lekovic GP, Sheehan JP. Skull Base Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Study Evaluating Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Skull Base Surg 2022; 83:e173-e180. [PMID: 35832959 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective Meningiomas are the second most common tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2). Microsurgery is challenging in NF-2 patients presenting with skull base meningiomas due to the intrinsic risks and need for multiple interventions over time. We analyzed treatment outcomes and complications after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to delineate its role in the management of these tumors. Methods An international multicenter retrospective study approved by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation was performed. NF-2 patients with at least one growing and/or symptomatic skull base meningioma and 6-month follow-up after primary GKRS were included. Clinical and radiosurgical parameters were recorded for analysis. Results In total, 22 NF-2 patients with 54 skull base meningiomas receiving GKRS as primary treatment met inclusion criteria. Median age at GKRS was 38 years (10-79 years). Most lesions were located in the posterior fossa (55.6%). Actuarial progression free survival (PFS) rates were 98.1% at 2 years and 90.0% at 5 and 10 years. The median follow-up time after initial GKRS was 5.0 years (0.6-25.5 years). Tumor volume at GKRS was a predictor of tumor control. Lesions >5.5 cc presented higher chances to progress after radiosurgery ( p = 0.043). Three patients (13.64%) developed adverse radiation effects. No malignant transformation or death due to meningioma or radiosurgery was reported. Conclusions GKRS is effective and safe in the management of skull base meningiomas in NF-2 patients. Tumor volume deserve greater relevance during clinical decision-making regarding the most appropriate time to treat. GKRS offers a minimally invasive approach of particular interest in this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David Arsanious
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT Hospital, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Gautam U Mehta
- Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Gregory P Lekovic
- Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cifarelli DT, Cifarelli CP. HSR22-135: Telemedicine for Cranial Radiosurgery Patients in a Rural US Population: Patterns and Predictors of Patient Utilization. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
16
|
Cifarelli DT, Weir JS, Slusser JD, Smith TM, DeWitt R, Cifarelli CP. Telemedicine for Cranial Radiosurgery Patients in a Rural U.S. Population: Patterns and Predictors of Patient Utilization. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28:1317-1323. [PMID: 35076292 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Telemedicine retains potential for increasing access to specialty providers in underserved and rural communities. COVID-19 accelerated adoption of telehealth beyond rural populations, serving as a primary modality of patient-provider encounters for many nonemergent diagnoses. Methods: From 2020 to 2021, telemedicine was incorporated in management of stereotactic radiosurgery patients. Retrospective data on diagnoses, demographics, distance to primary clinic, and encounter type were captured and statistically analyzed using descriptive measures and Cox proportional regression modeling. Graphical representation of service areas was created using geo-mapping software. Results: Patients (n = 208) completed 331 telemedicine encounters over 12 months. Metastases and meningiomas comprised 60% of diagnoses. Median age was 62 years with median household income and residential population of $44,752 and 7,634 people. The one-way mean and median travel distances were 74.6 and 66.3 miles. The total potential road mileage for all patients was 44,596 miles. A total of 118 (57%) patients completed video visits during the first encounter, whereas 90 (43%) opted for telephone encounters. At 12 months, 138 patients (66%) utilized video visits and 70 (34%) used telephone visits. Predictors of video visit use were video-enabled visit during the first encounter (hazard ratio [HR] 2.806, p < 0.001), total potential distance traveled (HR 1.681, p < 0.05), and the need for more than one visit per year (HR 2.903, p < 0.001). Discussion: Telemedicine can be effective in radiosurgery practice with predictors of video-enabled use being pre-existing patient comfort levels with videoconferencing, total annual travel distance, and number of visits per year. Age, rural population status, and household income did not impact telemedicine use in our patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Joshua S Weir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Jenifer D Slusser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Tanya M Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Rebecca DeWitt
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cifarelli CP, Jacobson GM. Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Brain Malignancies: Indications and Outcomes in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Front Oncol 2021; 11:768168. [PMID: 34858846 PMCID: PMC8631760 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.768168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the continued controversy over defining an optimal delivery mechanism, the critical role of adjuvant radiation in the management of surgically resected primary and metastatic brain tumors remains one of the universally accepted standards in neuro-oncology. Local disease control still ranks as a significant predictor of survival in both high-grade glioma and treated intracranial metastases with radiation treatment being essential in maximizing tumor control. As with the emergence and eventual acceptance of cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) following an era dominated by traditional radiotherapy, evidence to support the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in brain tumors requiring surgical intervention continues to accumulate. While the clinical trial strategies in treating glioblastoma with IORT involve delivery of a boost of cavitary radiation prior to the planned standard external beam radiation, the use of IORT in metastatic disease offers the potential for dose escalation to the level needed for definitive adjuvant radiation, eliminating the need for additional episodes of care while providing local control equal or superior to that achieved with SRS in a single fraction. In this review, we explore the contemporary clinical data on IORT in the treatment of brain tumors along with a discussion of the unique dosimetric and radiobiological factors inherent in IORT that could account for favorable outcome data beyond those seen in other techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Geraldine M Jacobson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen CJ, Ding D, Lee CC, Kearns KN, Pomeraniec IJ, Cifarelli CP, Arsanious DE, Liscak R, Hanuska J, Williams BJ, Yusuf MB, Woo SY, Ironside N, Warnick RE, Trifiletti DM, Mathieu D, Mureb M, Benjamin C, Kondziolka D, Feliciano CE, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Cockroft KM, Simon S, Mackley HB, Zammar S, Patel NT, Padmanaban V, Beatson N, Saylany A, Lee J, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Versus Without Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. Neurosurgery 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa418_s087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
19
|
Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Fang W, Liscak R, Guseynova K, Warnick RE, Lee CC, Yang HC, Borghei-Razavi H, Maiti T, Siddiqui ZA, Yuan JC, Grills IS, Mathieu D, Touchette CJ, Cordeiro D, Chiang V, Hess J, Tien CJ, Faramand A, Kano H, Barnett GH, Sheehan JP, Lunsford LD. Role of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF). Neurosurgery 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz428_s020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
20
|
Bunevicius A, Anand RK, Suleiman M, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad RM, Chytka T, Liscak R, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Yang HC, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Speckter H, Olivo J, Patel S, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Hack JD, Strickland BA, Zada G, Chang EL, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Meningiomas: An International, Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa544_s117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
21
|
Shepard MJ, Xu Z, Kearns K, Li C, Chatrath A, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Faramand A, Niranjan A, Kano H, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Liscak R, Guseynova K, Grills IS, Parzen JS, Cifarelli CP, Rehman AA, Atik A, Bakhsheshian J, Zada G, Chang E, Giannotta S, Speckter H, Wu HM, Kondziolka D, Golfinos JG, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Warnick RE, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Atypical (World Health Organization II) and Anaplastic (World Health Organization III) Meningiomas: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort Study. Neurosurgery 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa553_s121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
22
|
Bunevicius A, Pikis S, Kondziolka D, Patel DN, Bernstein K, Sulman EP, Lee CC, Yang HC, Delabar V, Mathieu D, Cifarelli CP, Arsanious DE, Dahshan BA, Weir JS, Speckter H, Mota A, Tripathi M, Kumar N, Warnick RE, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma considering tumor genetic profiles: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg 2021; 137:1-9. [PMID: 34740186 DOI: 10.3171/2021.7.jns211277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Molecular profiles, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, have important prognostic roles for glioblastoma patients. The authors studied the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma patients with consideration of molecular tumor profiles. METHODS For this retrospective observational multiinstitutional study, the authors pooled consecutive patients who were treated using SRS for glioblastoma at eight institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. They evaluated predictors of overall and progression-free survival with consideration of IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status. RESULTS Ninety-six patients (median age 56 years) underwent SRS (median dose 15 Gy and median treatment volume 5.53 cm3) at 147 tumor sites (range 1 to 7). The majority of patients underwent prior fractionated radiation therapy (92%) and temozolomide chemotherapy (98%). Most patients were treated at recurrence (85%), and boost SRS was used for 12% of patients. The majority of patients harbored IDH wild-type (82%) and MGMT-methylated (62%) tumors. Molecular data were unavailable for 33 patients. Median survival durations after SRS were similar between patients harboring IDH wild-type tumors and those with IDH mutant tumors (9.0 months vs 11 months, respectively), as well as between those with MGMT-methylated tumors and those with MGMT-unmethylated tumors (9.8 vs. 9.0 months, respectively). Prescription dose > 15 Gy (OR 0.367, 95% CI 0.190-0.709, p = 0.003) and treatment volume > 5 cm3 (OR 1.036, 95% CI 1.007-1.065, p = 0.014) predicted overall survival after controlling for age and IDH status. Treatment volume > 5 cm3 (OR 2.215, 95% CI 1.159-4.234, p = 0.02) and absence of gross-total resection (OR 0.403, 95% CI 0.208-0.781, p = 0.007) were associated with inferior local control of SRS-treated lesions in multivariate models. Nine patients experienced adverse radiation events after SRS, and 7 patients developed radiation necrosis at 59 to 395 days after SRS. CONCLUSIONS Post-SRS survival was similar as a function of IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation status, suggesting that molecular profiles of glioblastoma should be considered when selecting candidates for SRS. SRS prescription dose > 15 Gy and treatment volume ≤ 5 cm3 were associated with longer survival, independent of age and IDH status. Prior gross-total resection and smaller treatment volume were associated with superior local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adomas Bunevicius
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Dev N Patel
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Erik P Sulman
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 5School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 5School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Violaine Delabar
- 6Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 6Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - David E Arsanious
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Basem A Dahshan
- 8Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Joshua S Weir
- 8Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Herwin Speckter
- 9Gamma Knife Radiology Department, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Angel Mota
- 9Gamma Knife Radiology Department, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Narendra Kumar
- 11Department of Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; and
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- 12Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bunevicius A, Pikis S, Anand RK, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad RM, Chytka T, Liscak R, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Yang HC, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Speckter H, Olivo J, Patel S, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Hack JD, Strickland BA, Zada G, Chang EL, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic radiosurgery for clinoid meningiomas: a multi-institutional study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:2861-2869. [PMID: 34427769 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04972-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Resection of clinoid meningiomas can be associated with significant morbidity. Experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for clinoid meningiomas remains limited. We studied the safety and effectiveness of SRS for clinoid meningiomas. METHODS From twelve institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we pooled patients treated with SRS for radiologically suspected or histologically confirmed WHO grade I clinoid meningiomas. RESULTS Two hundred seven patients (median age: 56 years) underwent SRS for clinoid meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.02 cm3, and 87% of tumors were immediately adjacent to the optic apparatus. The median tumor prescription dose was 12 Gy, and the median maximal dose to the anterior optic apparatus was 8.5 Gy. During a median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 51.1 months, 7% of patients experienced tumor progression. Greater margin SRS dose (HR = 0.700, p = 0.007) and pre-SRS radiotherapy (HR = 0.004, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of better tumor control. During median visual follow-up of 48 months, visual function declined in 8% of patients. Pre-SRS visual deficit (HR = 2.938, p = 0.048) and maximal radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy (HR = 11.297, p = 0.02) independently predicted greater risk of post-SRS visual decline. Four patients experienced new post-SRS cranial nerve V neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS SRS allows durable control of clinoid meningiomas and visual preservation in the majority of patients. Greater radiosurgical prescription dose is associated with better tumor control. Radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy and visual impairment before the SRS increase risk of visual deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adomas Bunevicius
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | | | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jeremy Olivo
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - Ben A Strickland
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
| | | | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Asuzu DT, Bunevicius A, Kormath Anand R, Suleiman M, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdel Karim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad Eldin RM, Chytka T, Liščák R, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Perez Caceres M, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Yang HC, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Speckter H, Olivo J, Patel S, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Hack JD, Strickland BA, Zada G, Chang EL, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Warnick RE, Sheehan JP. Clinical and radiologic outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas in direct contact with the optic apparatus: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg 2021; 136:1070-1076. [PMID: 34560648 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.jns21328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Resection of meningiomas in direct contact with the anterior optic apparatus carries risk of injury to the visual pathway. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally invasive alternative. However, its use is limited owing to the risk of radiation-induced optic neuropathy. Few SRS studies have specifically assessed the risks and benefits of treating meningiomas in direct contact with the optic nerve, chiasm, or optic tract. The authors hypothesized that SRS is safe for select patients with meningiomas in direct contact with the anterior optic apparatus. METHODS The authors performed an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 328 patients across 11 institutions. All patients had meningiomas in direct contract with the optic apparatus. Patients were followed for a median duration of 56 months after SRS. Neurological examinations, including visual function evaluations, were performed at follow-up visits. Clinical and treatment variables were collected at each site according to protocol. Tumor volumes were assessed with serial MR imaging. Variables predictive of visual deficit were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS SRS was the initial treatment modality for 64.6% of patients, and 93% of patients received SRS as a single fraction. Visual information was available for 302 patients. Of these patients, visual decline occurred in 29 patients (9.6%), of whom 12 (41.4%) had evidence of tumor progression. Visual decline in the remaining 17 patients (5.6%) was not associated with tumor progression. Pre-SRS Karnofsky Performance Status predicted visual decline in adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.9-1.0, p < 0.01). Follow-up imaging data were available for 322 patients. Of these patients, 294 patients (91.3%) had radiographic evidence of stability or tumor regression at last follow up. Symptom duration was associated with tumor progression in adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 1.01, adjusted 95% CI 1.0-1.02, adjusted p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In this international multicenter study, the vast majority of patients exhibited tumor control and preservation of visual function when SRS was used to treat meningioma in direct contact with the anterior optic pathways. SRS is a relatively safe treatment modality for select patients with perioptic meningiomas in direct contact with the optic apparatus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Asuzu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.,20Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Adomas Bunevicius
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Mohanad Suleiman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,3Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,4Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,4Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,6Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,4Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- 2Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,5Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Tomas Chytka
- 7Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liščák
- 7Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,10School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,10School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Piero Picozzi
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Herwin Speckter
- 12Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jeremy Olivo
- 12Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Samir Patel
- 13Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.,15Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Joshua D Hack
- 15Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ben A Strickland
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric L Chang
- 17Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- 18Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- 18Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- 19Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio; and
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sarria GR, Cifarelli CP, Kahl H, Giordano FA. In regard to Minniti et al.: Current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases-roundup to cover all angles. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:127. [PMID: 34246284 PMCID: PMC8272371 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01854-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
We read with great interest the recent review, entitled "Current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases". It is a comprehensive summary of currently available techniques for treatment of post-resection cavity in patients with this diagnosis. We would like to complement this manuscript by including intraoperative techniques as other viable approaches in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1 Building 55, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1 Building 55, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cifarelli CP, McMichael JP, Forman AG, Mihm PA, Cifarelli DT, Lee MR, Marsh W. Surgical Start Time Impact on Hospital Length of Stay for Elective Inpatient Procedures. Cureus 2021; 13:e16259. [PMID: 34277303 PMCID: PMC8269978 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hospital length of stay (LOS) remains an important, albeit nonspecific, metric in the analysis of surgical services. Modifiable factors to reduce LOS are few in number and the ability to practically take action is limited. Surgical scheduling of elective cases remains an important task in optimizing workflow and may impact the post-surgical LOS. Methods Retrospective data from a single tertiary care academic institution were analyzed from elective adult surgical cases performed from 2017 through 2019. Emergent or urgent add-on cases were excluded. Variables included primary procedure, age, diabetes status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and surgical start time. Analysis of the median LOS following surgery was performed using Mann-Whitney tests and Cox hazards model. Matched-cohort analysis of mean total hospitalization costs was performed using the Student’s t-test. Results 9,258 patients were analyzed across five surgical service lines, of which 777 patients had surgical start time after 3 PM. The median LOS for the after 3 PM group was 1 day longer than the before 3 PM start time cohort (3.0 vs 2.1, p < 0.001). Service line analysis revealed increased LOS for Orthopedics and Neurosurgery (3.0 vs 1.9, p < 0.001; 3.0 vs 2.0, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that start time before 3 PM predicted shorter LOS (HR = 1.214, 1.126-1.309; p < 0.001). Case-matched cost analysis for frequently performed orthopedic and neurosurgical cases with an after 3 PM start time failed to demonstrate a significant difference in total hospital charges. Conclusion Optimization of surgical services scheduling to increase the proportion of elective surgical cases started before 3 PM has the potential to decrease post-surgical LOS for adult patients undergoing Orthopedic or Neurosurgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA.,Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| | | | - Alex G Forman
- Strategic Analytics, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| | - Paul A Mihm
- Surgical Services, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Neurosurgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| | - Mark R Lee
- Neurosurgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| | - Wallis Marsh
- Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shepard MJ, Xu Z, Kearns K, Li C, Chatrath A, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Faramand A, Niranjan A, Kano H, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Liscak R, Guseynova K, Grills IS, Parzen JS, Cifarelli CP, Rehman AA, Atik A, Bakhsheshian J, Zada G, Chang E, Giannotta S, Speckter H, Wu HM, Kondziolka D, Golfinos JG, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Warnick RE, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Atypical (World Health Organization II) and Anaplastic (World Health Organization III) Meningiomas: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort Study. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:980-988. [PMID: 33469655 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas have reduced progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) compared to benign meningiomas. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for atypical meningiomas (AMs) and anaplastic meningiomas (malignant meningiomas, MMs) has not been adequately described. OBJECTIVE To define clinical/radiographic outcomes for patients undergoing SRS for AM/MMs. METHODS An international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed to define clinical/imaging outcomes for patients receiving SRS for AM/MMs. Tumor progression was assessed with response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria. Factors associated with PFS/OS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 271 patients received SRS for AMs (n = 233, 85.9%) or MMs (n = 38, 14.0%). Single-fraction SRS was most commonly employed (n = 264, 97.4%) with a mean target dose of 14.8 Gy. SRS was used as adjuvant treatment (n = 85, 31.4%), salvage therapy (n = 182, 67.2%), or primary therapy (1.5%). The 5-yr PFS/OS rate was 33.6% and 77.0%, respectively. Increasing age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, P < .05) and a Ki-67 index > 15% (HR = 1.66, P < .03) negatively correlated with PFS. MMs (HR = 3.21, P < .05), increased age (HR = 1.04, P = .04), and reduced KPS (HR = 0.95, P = .04) were associated with shortened OS. Adjuvant versus salvage SRS did not impact PFS/OS. A shortened interval between surgery and SRS improved PFS for AMs (HR = 0.99, P = .02) on subgroup analysis. Radiation necrosis occurred in 34 (12.5%) patients. Five-year rates of repeat surgery/radiation were 33.8% and 60.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION AM/MMs remain challenging tumors to treat. Elevated proliferative indices are associated with tumor recurrence, while MMs have worse survival. SRS can control AM/MMs in the short term, but the 5-yr PFS rates are low, underscoring the need for improved treatment options for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.,MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Kathryn Kearns
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Chelsea Li
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ajay Chatrath
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Andrew Faramand
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Khumar Guseynova
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Jacob S Parzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - Azeem A Rehman
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ahmet Atik
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joshua Bakhsheshian
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven Giannotta
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liscak R, Tripathi M, Arsanious D, Cifarelli CP, Perez Caceres M, Mathieu D, Speckter H, Mehta GU, Lekovic GP, Sheehan JP. Neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas: an international multicenter study of outcomes after Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2021; 136:109-114. [PMID: 34144518 DOI: 10.3171/2020.12.jns202814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The management of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-associated meningiomas is challenging. The role of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in the treatment of these tumors remains to be fully defined. In this study, the authors aimed to examine the role of GKRS in the treatment of NF2-associated meningiomas and to evaluate the outcomes and complications after treatment. METHODS Seven international medical centers contributed data for this retrospective cohort. Tumor progression was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from the baseline value. The clinical features, treatment details, outcomes, and complications were studied. The median follow-up was 8.5 years (range 0.6-25.5 years) from the time of initial GKRS. Shared frailty Cox regression was used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 204 meningiomas in 39 patients treated with GKRS were analyzed. Cox regression analysis showed that increasing the maximum dose (p = 0.02; HR 12.2, 95% CI 1.287-116.7) and a lower number of meningiomas at presentation (p = 0.03; HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.821-0.990) were predictive of better tumor control in both univariable and multivariable settings. Age at onset, sex, margin dose, location, and presence of neurological deficit were not predictive of tumor progression. The cumulative 10-year progression-free survival was 94.8%. Radiation-induced adverse effects were noted in 4 patients (10%); these were transient and managed medically. No post-GKRS malignant transformation was noted in 287 person-years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS GKRS achieved effective tumor control with a low and generally acceptable rate of complications in NF2-associated meningiomas. There did not appear to be an appreciable risk of post-GKRS-induced malignancy in patients with NF2-treated meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Mohammed
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Tomas Chytka
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David Arsanious
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | | | - Marco Perez Caceres
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Herwin Speckter
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, CEDIMAT Hospital, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; and
| | - Gautam U Mehta
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gregory P Lekovic
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bunevicius A, Anand RK, Suleiman M, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad RM, Chytka T, Liscak R, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Yang HC, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Speckter H, Olivo J, Patel S, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Hack JD, Strickland BA, Zada G, Chang EL, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Meningiomas: An International, Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:828-837. [PMID: 33475718 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used for management of perioptic meningiomas. OBJECTIVE To study the safety and effectiveness of SRS for perioptic meningiomas. METHODS From 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF), we retrospectively assessed treatment parameters and outcomes following SRS for meningiomas located within 3 mm of the optic apparatus. RESULTS A total of 438 patients (median age 51 yr) underwent SRS for histologically confirmed (29%) or radiologically suspected (71%) perioptic meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.01 cm3. Median prescription dose was 12 Gy, and median dose to the optic apparatus was 8.50 Gy. A total of 405 patients (93%) underwent single-fraction SRS and 33 patients (7%) underwent hypofractionated SRS. During median imaging follow-up of 55.6 mo (range: 3.15-239 mo), 33 (8%) patients experienced tumor progression. Actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr progression-free survival was 96% and 89%, respectively. Prescription dose of ≥12 Gy (HR: 0.310; 95% CI [0.141-0.679], P = .003) and single-fraction SRS (HR: 0.078; 95% CI [0.016-0.395], P = .002) were associated with improved tumor control. A total of 31 (10%) patients experienced visual decline, with actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr post-SRS visual decline rates of 9% and 21%, respectively. Maximum dose to the optic apparatus ≥10 Gy (HR = 2.370; 95% CI [1.086-5.172], P = .03) and tumor progression (HR = 4.340; 95% CI [2.070-9.097], P < .001) were independent predictors of post-SRS visual decline. CONCLUSION SRS provides durable tumor control and quite acceptable rates of vision preservation in perioptic meningiomas. Margin dose of ≥12 Gy is associated with improved tumor control, while a dose to the optic apparatus of ≥10 Gy and tumor progression are associated with post-SRS visual decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adomas Bunevicius
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Mohanad Suleiman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jeremy Olivo
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Joshua D Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ben A Strickland
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen CJ, Ding D, Lee CC, Kearns KN, Pomeraniec IJ, Cifarelli CP, Arsanious DE, Liscak R, Hanuska J, Williams BJ, Yusuf MB, Woo SY, Ironside N, Warnick RE, Trifiletti DM, Mathieu D, Mureb M, Benjamin C, Kondziolka D, Feliciano CE, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Cockroft KM, Simon S, Mackley HB, Zammar S, Patel NT, Padmanaban V, Beatson N, Saylany A, Lee J, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Versus Without Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:313-321. [PMID: 33017465 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior comparisons of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without embolization were inherently flawed, due to differences in the pretreatment nidus volumes. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of embolization and SRS, vs SRS alone for AVMs using pre-embolization malformation features. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Patients were categorized into the embolization and SRS (E + SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. Primary outcome was defined as AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiologic and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC), and cyst formation. RESULTS The matched cohorts each comprised 101 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched E + SRS vs SRS-only cohorts (48.5% vs 54.5%; odds ratio = 0.788, P = .399). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were also similar between the E + SRS (33.0%, 46.4%, 56.2%, and 60.8%, respectively) and SRS-only (32.9%, 46.2%, 56.0%, and 60.6%, respectively) cohorts (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 1.005, P = .981). Cumulative probabilities of radiologic RIC at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were lower in the E + SRS (25.0%, 25.7%, 26.7%, and 26.7%, respectively) vs SRS-only (45.3%, 46.2%, 47.8%, and 47.8%, respectively) cohort (SHR = 0.478, P = .004). Symptomatic and asymptomatic embolization-related complication rates were 8.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, symptomatic RIC, and cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. CONCLUSION This study refutes the prevalent notion that AVM embolization negatively affects the likelihood of obliteration after SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Jen Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Dale Ding
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kathryn N Kearns
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - I Jonathan Pomeraniec
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - David E Arsanious
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir Hanuska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Brian J Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Mehran B Yusuf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Shiao Y Woo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Natasha Ironside
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Monica Mureb
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Caleb E Feliciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - Kevin M Cockroft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Heath B Mackley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer Zammar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Neel T Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Varun Padmanaban
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Beatson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anissa Saylany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chen CJ, Ding D, Lee CC, Kearns KN, Pomeraniec IJ, Cifarelli CP, Arsanious DE, Liscak R, Hanuska J, Williams BJ, Yusuf MB, Woo SY, Ironside N, Warnick RE, Trifiletti DM, Mathieu D, Mureb M, Benjamin C, Kondziolka D, Feliciano CE, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Cockroft KM, Simon S, Mackley HB, Zammar SG, Patel NT, Padmanaban V, Beatson N, Saylany A, Lee J, Sheehan JP. Embolization of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations With Versus Without Onyx Before Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:366-374. [PMID: 32860409 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) using ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx) embolization may influence the treatment effects of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) differently than other embolysates. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of pre-SRS AVM embolization with vs without Onyx through a multicenter, retrospective matched cohort study. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Embolized AVMs treated with SRS were selected and categorized based on embolysate usage into Onyx embolization (OE + SRS) or non-Onyx embolization (NOE + SRS) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using de novo AVM features for comparative analysis of outcomes. RESULTS The matched cohorts each comprised 45 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched OE + SRS vs NOE + SRS cohorts (47% vs 51%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.837, P = .673). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration were also similar between the OE + SRS vs NOE + SRS cohorts (subhazard ratio = 0.992, P = .980). Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiation-induced changes, cyst formation, and embolization-associated complications were similar between the matched cohorts. Sensitivity analysis for AVMs in the OE + SRS cohort embolized with Onyx alone revealed a higher rate of asymptomatic embolization-associated complications in this subgroup compared to the NOE + SRS cohort (36% vs 15%; OR = 3.297, P = .034), but the symptomatic complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION Nidal embolization using Onyx does not appear to differentially impact the outcomes of AVM SRS compared with non-Onyx embolysates. The embolic agent selected for pre-SRS AVM embolization should reflect both the experience of the neurointerventionalist and target of endovascular intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Jen Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Dale Ding
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kathryn N Kearns
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - I Jonathan Pomeraniec
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - David E Arsanious
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir Hanuska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Brian J Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Mehran B Yusuf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Shiao Y Woo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Natasha Ironside
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Monica Mureb
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Caleb E Feliciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - Kevin M Cockroft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Heath B Mackley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer G Zammar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Neel T Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Varun Padmanaban
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Beatson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anissa Saylany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cifarelli CP, Jacques A, Bobko A. Heterogeneity of radiation response in mesenchymal subtype glioblastoma: molecular profiling and reactive oxygen species generation. J Neurooncol 2021; 152:245-255. [PMID: 33566263 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03707-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy-induced tumor death remains critical in the successful first-line management of glioblastoma, whereas resistance to radiation serves as a major factor in disease progression. Mesenchymal shift has been identified as a driver in GBM recurrence, with gene expression associated with enhanced repair of macromolecular damage caused by radiation. METHODS Using distinct mesenchymal subtype GBM cells lines, radiation response was assessed by clonogenic assay and orthotopic mouse tumor model. RNA-sequencing was performed in the setting of increasing radiation dosing while real-time assessment of ROS generation was achieved by the measurement of hydroxyl spin trap adducts via electron paramagnetic resonance. RESULTS Radiation-induced cell death determined by clonogenic assay was significantly different at low dose (4-8 Gy) between the resistant U3035 cells and the sensitive U3020 cells. Similar trends were present in the in vivo NSG mouse model following radiation dosing on post-implantation day 7-10, with the rate of reduction in tumor bioluminescence reversing between the U3020 and U3035 cells after the third dose of radiation. Changes in gene expression following radiation determined by RNA-sequencing indicate both U3035 and U3020 cells demonstrate a shift toward more mesenchymal profiles, with concurrent shift away from pro-neural subtype gene expression in the U3020 cells that appeared to develop resistance to radiation in vivo. Persistence of ROS generated following radiation was greater in U3020 cells shown to be more sensitive to radiation. CONCLUSIONS Despite the same molecular classification, distinct GBM cell lines can demonstrate differential response to radiation and potential for mesenchymal shift associated with radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Suite 4300, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9183, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | - Angelica Jacques
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Suite 4300, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9183, USA
| | - Andrey Bobko
- Department of Biochemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kowalchuk RO, Shepard MJ, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Faramand A, Niranjan A, Kano H, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Liscak R, Guseynova K, Grills IS, Parzen JS, Cifarelli CP, Rehman AA, Atik A, Bakhsheshian J, Zada G, Chang E, Giannotta S, Speckter H, Wu HM, Kondziolka D, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Warnick RE, Lunsford LD, Trifiletti DM, Sheehan JP. Treatment of WHO Grade 2 Meningiomas With Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Identification of an Optimal Group for SRS Using RPA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:804-814. [PMID: 33548341 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assesses a large multi-institutional database to present the outcomes of World Health Organization grade 2 meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We also compare the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) to that reported in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0539 phase 2 cooperative group meningioma trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS From an international, multicenter group, data were collected for grade 2 meningioma patients treated with SRS for demonstrable tumor from 1994 to 2019. Statistical methods used included the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards analysis, and recursive partitioning analysis. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-three patients treated at 12 institutions were included. Patients presented at a median age of 60 years (range, 13-90), and many had at least 2 prior resections (30%) or radiation therapy (22%). Forty-eight percent of patients had prior gross total resection. At SRS, the median treatment volume was 6.1 cm3 (0.1-97.6). A median 15 Gy (10-30) was delivered to a median percent isodose of 50 (30-80), most commonly in 1 fraction (95%). A model was developed using recursive partitioning analysis, with one point attributed to age >50 years, treatment volume >11.5 cm3, and prior radiation therapy or multiple surgeries. The good-prognostic group (score, 0-1) had improved PFS (P < .005) and time to local failure (P < .005) relative to the poor-prognostic group (score, 2-3). Age >50 years (hazard ratio = 1.85 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.14]) and multiple prior surgeries (hazard ratio = 1.80 [1.09-2.99]) also portended reduced PFS in patients without prior radiation therapy. Two hundred eighteen of 233 patients in this study qualified for the high-risk group of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0539, and they demonstrated similar outcomes (3-year PFS: 53.9% vs 58.8%). The good-prognostic group of SRS patients demonstrated slightly improved outcomes (3-year PFS: 63.1% vs 58.8%). CONCLUSIONS SRS should be considered in carefully selected patients with atypical meningiomas. We suggest the use of our good-prognostic group to optimize patient selection, and we strongly encourage the initiation of a clinical trial to prospectively validate these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Andrew Faramand
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Medical Physics, NYU Langone Health System, New York, New York
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Khumar Guseynova
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Jacob S Parzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - Azeem A Rehman
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ahmet Atik
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joshua Bakhsheshian
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven Giannotta
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, New York, New York
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Center of Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ruiz-Garcia H, Trifiletti DM, Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liscak R, Tripathi M, Arsanious D, Cifarelli CP, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Speckter H, Lekovic GP, Mehta GU, Sheehan JP. Convexity Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Long-Term Outcomes After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. World Neurosurg 2021; 146:e678-e684. [PMID: 33152493 PMCID: PMC7988886 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convexity meningiomas are common tumors requiring treatment in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Although different therapeutic options are described for sporadic convexity meningioma, much less is known about these lesions in patients with NF2 despite their distinct biology and need for multiple treatments. We analyzed the value of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) as definitive treatment for convexity meningiomas in patients with NF2. METHODS This international multicenter retrospective study was approved by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Patients with NF2 with at least 1 convexity meningioma and 6-month follow-up after primary GKRS were included. RESULTS Inclusion criteria were met by 18 patients with NF2. A total of 120 convexity meningiomas (median treatment volume, 0.66 cm3 [range, 0.10-21.20 cm3]) were analyzed. Median follow-up after initial GKRS was 15.6 years (range, 0.6-25.5 years). Median age at GKRS was 32.5 years (range, 16-53 years). Median number of meningiomas per patient was 13 (range, 1-27), and median number of convexity lesions receiving GKRS per patient was 3.5 (range, 1-27). One case of tumor progression was reported 24 years after GKRS, leading to actuarial progression-free survival rates of 100% at 2, 5, and 10 years. No malignant transformation or death due to meningioma or radiosurgery was recorded. CONCLUSIONS GKRS is safe and effective as definitive treatment of small to medium-sized convexity meningiomas in patients with NF2. Despite concerns about the particular mutational burden of these tumors, no malignant transformation manifested after treatment. GKRS represents a minimally invasive option that offers long-term tumor control to this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David Arsanious
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT Hospital, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | | | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Fang W, Liscak R, Guseynova K, Warnick RE, Lee CC, Yang HC, Borghei-Razavi H, Maiti T, Siddiqui ZA, Yuan JC, Grills IS, Mathieu D, Touchette CJ, Cordeiro D, Chiang V, Hess J, Tien CJ, Faramand A, Kano H, Barnett GH, Sheehan JP, Lunsford LD. Role of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF). Neurosurgery 2021; 87:664-671. [PMID: 31599324 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a high incidence of brain metastases in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), limited data exist on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), specifically Gamma Knife™ radiosurgery (Elekta AB), for SCLC brain metastases. OBJECTIVE To provide a detailed analysis of SCLC patients treated with SRS, focusing on local failure, distant brain failure, and overall survival (OS). METHODS A multi-institutional retrospective review was performed on 293 patients undergoing SRS for SCLC brain metastases at 10 medical centers from 1991 to 2017. Data collection was performed according to individual institutional review boards, and analyses were performed using binary logistic regression, Cox-proportional hazard models, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and competing risks analysis. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-two (79%) patients received SRS as salvage following prior whole-brain irradiation (WBRT) or prophylactic cranial irradiation, with a median marginal dose of 18 Gy. At median follow-up after SRS of 6.4 and 18.0 mo for surviving patients, the 1-yr local failure, distant brain failure, and OS were 31%, 49%, and 28%. The interval between WBRT and SRS was predictive of improved OS for patients receiving SRS more than 1 yr after initial treatment (21%, <1 yr vs 36%, >1 yr, P = .01). On multivariate analysis, older age was the only significant predictor for OS (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.16-2.29, P = .005). CONCLUSION SRS plays an important role in the management of brain metastases from SCLC, especially in salvage therapy following WBRT. Ongoing prospective trials will better assess the value of radiosurgery in the primary management of SCLC brain metastases and potentially challenge the standard application of WBRT in SCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Wei Fang
- West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Khumar Guseynova
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Tonmoy Maiti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Zaid A Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Justin C Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Charles J Touchette
- Division of Neurosurgery, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Diogo Cordeiro
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Judith Hess
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christopher J Tien
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Andrew Faramand
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rusthoven CG, Yamamoto M, Bernhardt D, Smith DE, Gao D, Serizawa T, Yomo S, Aiyama H, Higuchi Y, Shuto T, Akabane A, Sato Y, Niranjan A, Faramand AM, Lunsford LD, McInerney J, Tuanquin LC, Zacharia BE, Chiang V, Singh C, Yu JB, Braunstein S, Mathieu D, Touchette CJ, Lee CC, Yang HC, Aizer AA, Cagney DN, Chan MD, Kondziolka D, Bernstein K, Silverman JS, Grills IS, Siddiqui ZA, Yuan JC, Sheehan JP, Cordeiro D, Nosaki K, Seto T, Deibert CP, Verma V, Day S, Halasz LM, Warnick RE, Trifiletti DM, Palmer JD, Attia A, Li B, Cifarelli CP, Brown PD, Vargo JA, Combs SE, Kessel KA, Rieken S, Patel S, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Kavanagh BD, Robin TP. Evaluation of First-line Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: The FIRE-SCLC Cohort Study. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:1028-1037. [PMID: 32496550 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred for limited brain metastases from most histologies, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with small cell lung cancer. Data on SRS are limited. Objective To characterize and compare first-line SRS outcomes (without prior WBRT or prophylactic cranial irradiation) with those of first-line WBRT. Design, Setting, and Participants FIRE-SCLC (First-line Radiosurgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer) was a multicenter cohort study that analyzed SRS outcomes from 28 centers and a single-arm trial and compared these data with outcomes from a first-line WBRT cohort. Data were collected from October 26, 2017, to August 15, 2019, and analyzed from August 16, 2019, to November 6, 2019. Interventions SRS and WBRT for small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival, time to central nervous system progression (TTCP), and central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) after SRS were evaluated and compared with WBRT outcomes, with adjustment for performance status, number of brain metastases, synchronicity, age, sex, and treatment year in multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses. Results In total, 710 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 68.5 [62-74] years; 531 men [74.8%]) who received SRS between 1994 and 2018 were analyzed. The median overall survival was 8.5 months, the median TTCP was 8.1 months, and the median CNS PFS was 5.0 months. When stratified by the number of brain metastases treated, the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.9-13.4) for 1 lesion, 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-10.4) for 2 to 4 lesions, 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.6) for 5 to 10 lesions, and 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.6) for 11 or more lesions. Competing risk estimates were 7.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-9.2%) for local failures at 12 months and 41.6% (95% CI, 37.6%-45.7%) for distant CNS failures at 12 months. Leptomeningeal progression (46 of 425 patients [10.8%] with available data) and neurological mortality (80 of 647 patients [12.4%] with available data) were uncommon. On propensity score-matched analyses comparing SRS with WBRT, WBRT was associated with improved TTCP (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.55; P < .001), without an improvement in overall survival (median, 6.5 months [95% CI, 5.5-8.0] for SRS vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 4.4-6.7] for WBRT; P = .003) or CNS PFS (median, 4.0 months for SRS vs 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .79). Multivariable analyses comparing SRS and WBRT, including subset analyses controlling for extracranial metastases and extracranial disease control status, demonstrated similar results. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study suggest that the primary trade-offs associated with SRS without WBRT, including a shorter TTCP without a decrease in overall survival, are similar to those observed in settings in which SRS is already established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad G Rusthoven
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aurora
| | | | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Derek E Smith
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora
| | - Dexiang Gao
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | | | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Shuto
- Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsuya Akabane
- Gamma Knife Center, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasunori Sato
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew M Faramand
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James McInerney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Leonard C Tuanquin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charu Singh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charles J Touchette
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel N Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Joshua S Silverman
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Zaid A Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Justin C Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Diogo Cordeiro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Kename Nosaki
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takahashi Seto
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samuel Day
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jewish Hospital-Mercy Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Albert Attia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Benjamin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Samir Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, The University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, The University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aurora
| | - Tyler P Robin
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dahshan BA, Weir JS, Bice RP, Renz P, Cifarelli DT, Poplawski L, Hack J, Vargo JA, Cifarelli CP. Dose homogeneity analysis of adjuvant radiation treatment in surgically resected brain metastases: Comparison of IORT, SRS, and IMRT indices. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:426-432. [PMID: 33454200 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although surgery remains a treatment option for symptomatic brain metastases, the need for adjuvant radiation after surgery is widely accepted as standard. Despite a multitude of randomized trials aimed at identifying the ideal radiation treatment plan for surgically resected metastases, the development of new delivery regiments necessitates a periodic re-evaluation of dosimetric performance/outcome. Here, we compare the homogeneity index (HI) across three platforms: single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), multisession stereotactic radiotherapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients treated with IORT after surgical resection of brain metastases were identified and dosimetric parameters collected from the dose-volume histograms based on the development of conformal plans for adjuvant radiation using Gamma Knife-SRS (GK-SRS), linear accelerator based intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and IORT. HIs were calculated using four established methods and compared across platforms within the patient cohort. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance. RESULTS The mean maximal doses for the GK-SRS and IMRT plans were 30 Gy and 29 Gy with margin prescription doses of 16 Gy and 24 Gy, respectively. The IORT dose was 30 Gy to the applicator surface. HIs varied based on calculation methods, but maintained consistency when comparing across platforms with IORT having the lower mean HI value (0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.60) in single-fraction treatment, compared with GK-SRS (0.77; 95% CI 0.76-0.80). The mean multisession IMRT HI was lower than both single-fraction treatment modalities at 0.41 (95% CI 0.40-0.42). CONCLUSIONS When using the HI as the primary dosimetric parameter for adjuvant radiation plans after surgical resection of brain metastases IORT offers improved dose homogeneity compared with GK-SRS in single-fraction treatment, whereas fractionated LINAC-based IMRT was superior with respect to the HI in comparison among all three methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basem A Dahshan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - Joshua S Weir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - Robert P Bice
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - Paul Renz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Linda Poplawski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - Joshua Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mohammed N, Hung YC, Chen CJ, Xu Z, Schlesinger D, Kano H, Chiang V, Hess J, Lee J, Mathieu D, Kaufmann AM, Grills IS, Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Chytka T, Janouskova L, Feliciano CE, Mercado RR, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. A Proposed Grading Scale for Predicting Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas. Neurosurgery 2020; 87:247-255. [PMID: 31584074 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are presently no grading scales that specifically address the outcomes of cranial dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). OBJECTIVE To design a practical grading system that would predict outcomes after SRS for cranial dAVFs. METHODS From the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (University of Pittsburgh [41 patients], University of Pennsylvania [6 patients], University of Sherbrooke [2 patients], University of Manitoba [1 patient], West Virginia University [2 patients], University of Puerto Rico [1 patient], Beaumont Health System 1 [patient], Na Homolce Hospital [13 patients], the University of Virginia [48 patients], and Yale University [6 patients]) centers, 120 patients with dAVF treated with SRS were included in the study. The factors predicting favorable outcome (obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage) after SRS were assessed using logistic regression analysis. These factors were pooled with the factors that were found to be predictive of obliteration from 7 studies with 736 patients after a systematic review of literature. These were entered into stepwise multiple regression and the best-fit model was identified. RESULTS Based on the predictive model, 3 factors emerged to develop an SRS scoring system: cortical venous reflux (CVR), prior intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and noncavernous sinus location. Class I (score of 0-1 points) predicted the best favorable outcome of 80%. Class II patients (2 points score) had an intermediate favorable outcome of 57%, and class III (score 3 points) had the least favorable outcome at 37%. The ROC analysis showed better predictability to prevailing grading systems (AUC = 0.69; P = .04). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed statistically significant difference between the 3 subclasses of the proposed grading system for post-SRS dAVF obliteration (P = .001). CONCLUSION The proposed dAVF grading system incorporates angiographic, anatomic, and clinical parameters and improves the prediction of the outcomes following SRS for dAVF as compared to the existing scoring systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - David Schlesinger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Judith Hess
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - John Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Anthony M Kaufmann
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - John A Vargo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Caleb E Feliciano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen CJ, Ding D, Lee CC, Kearns KN, Pomeraniec IJ, Cifarelli CP, Arsanious DE, Liscak R, Hanuska J, Williams BJ, Yusuf MB, Woo SY, Ironside N, Burke RM, Warnick RE, Trifiletti DM, Mathieu D, Mureb M, Benjamin C, Kondziolka D, Feliciano CE, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Cockroft KM, Simon S, Mackley HB, Zammar SG, Patel NT, Padmanaban V, Beatson N, Saylany A, Lee JYK, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery with versus without prior Onyx embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2020:1-9. [PMID: 33307527 DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.jns201731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigations of the combined effects of neoadjuvant Onyx embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have not accounted for initial angioarchitectural features prior to neuroendovascular intervention. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter matched cohort study is to compare the outcomes of SRS with versus without upfront Onyx embolization for AVMs using de novo characteristics of the preembolized nidus. METHODS The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized based on AVM treatment approach into Onyx embolization (OE) and SRS (OE+SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts and then propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiological and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RICs), and cyst formation. Comparisons were analyzed using crude rates and cumulative probabilities adjusted for competing risk of death. RESULTS The matched OE+SRS and SRS-only cohorts each comprised 53 patients. Crude rates (37.7% vs 47.2% for the OE+SRS vs SRS-only cohorts, respectively; OR 0.679, p = 0.327) and cumulative probabilities at 3, 4, 5, and 6 years (33.7%, 44.1%, 57.5%, and 65.7% for the OE+SRS cohort vs 34.8%, 45.5%, 59.0%, and 67.1% for the SRS-only cohort, respectively; subhazard ratio 0.961, p = 0.896) of AVM obliteration were similar between the matched cohorts. The secondary outcomes of the matched cohorts were also similar. Asymptomatic and symptomatic embolization-related complication rates in the matched OE+SRS cohort were 18.9% and 9.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pre-SRS AVM embolization with Onyx does not appear to negatively influence outcomes after SRS. These analyses, based on de novo nidal characteristics, thereby refute previous studies that found detrimental effects of Onyx embolization on SRS-induced AVM obliteration. However, given the risks incurred by nidal embolization using Onyx, this neoadjuvant intervention should be used judiciously in multimodal treatment strategies involving SRS for appropriately selected large-volume or angioarchitecturally high-risk AVMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Jen Chen
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kathryn N Kearns
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - I Jonathan Pomeraniec
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - David E Arsanious
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Roman Liscak
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir Hanuska
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Shiao Y Woo
- 6Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Natasha Ironside
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Rebecca M Burke
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - David Mathieu
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Monica Mureb
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Carolina Benjamin
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | | | - Caleb E Feliciano
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | | | | | - Heath B Mackley
- 13Radiation Oncology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | | | | | - Nathan Beatson
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anissa Saylany
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Y K Lee
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hung YC, Mohammed N, Kearns KN, Chen CJ, Starke RM, Kano H, Lee J, Mathieu D, Kaufmann AM, Wang WG, Grills IS, Cifarelli CP, Vargo J, Chytka T, Janouskova L, Feliciano CE, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cavernous Sinus Versus Noncavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Outcomes and Outcome Predictors. Neurosurgery 2020; 86:676-684. [PMID: 31384943 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) can be categorized based on location. OBJECTIVE To compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes between cavernous sinus (CS) and non-CS DAVFs and to identify respective outcome predictors. METHODS This is a retrospective study of DAVFs treated with SRS between 1988 and 2016 at 10 institutions. Patients' variables, DAVF characters, and SRS parameters were included for analyses. Favorable clinical outcome was defined as angiography-confirmed obliteration without radiological radiation-induced changes (RIC) or post-SRS hemorrhage. Other outcomes were DAVFs obliteration and adverse events (including RIC, symptomatic RIC, and post-SRS hemorrhage). RESULTS The overall study cohort comprised 131 patients, including 20 patients with CS DAVFs (15%) and 111 patients with non-CS DAVFs (85%). Rates of favorable clinical outcome were comparable between the 2 groups (45% vs 37%, P = .824). Obliteration rate after SRS was higher in the CS DAVFs group, even adjusted for baseline difference (OR = 4.189, P = .044). Predictors of favorable clinical outcome included higher maximum dose (P = .014) for CS DAVFs. Symptomatic improvement was associated with obliteration in non-CS DAVFs (P = .005), but symptoms improved regardless of whether obliteration was confirmed in CS DAVFs. Non-CS DAVFs patients with adverse events after SRS were more likely to be male (P = .020), multiple arterial feeding fistulas (P = .018), and lower maximum dose (P = .041). CONCLUSION After SRS, CS DAVFs are more likely to obliterate than non-CS ones. Because these 2 groups have different total predictors for clinical and radiologic outcomes after SRS, they should be considered as different entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chieh Hung
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Recreation and Healthcare Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Kathryn N Kearns
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Robert M Starke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Anthony M Kaufmann
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Wei Gang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - John Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Caleb E Feliciano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Departments of Neurosurgery & Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rehman AA, Singh S, Arsanious D, Renz P, Cifarelli CP. Abstract 1185: Impact of distance traveled to radiosurgery center on time to initiation of gamma knife treatment for brain metastases in a rural patient population. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-1185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The West Virginia University Gamma Knife center provides care for largely rural areas with patients that often travel 1-3 hours for treatment. Studies investigating whether distance to a tertiary cancer center results in meaningful delays in care are limited. This study examines patients treated with gamma knife for brain metastases to identify predictors of delay in care based on distance from the treatment center. Retrospective data for patients treated at the West Virginia University Gamma Knife center (2010-2017) for brain metastases with a primary diagnosis of lung or breast cancer was analyzed. Study variables included age, gender, primary histology, ECOG, KPS, RPA, interval time to initiation (TTI) of gamma knife treatment from diagnosis, and distance from home to the center. Statistical significance was determined by p<0.05. A total of 182 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR: 53.5-69 years), median ECOG of 1 (Range: 0-3), median KPS of 80 (IQR: 70-100), and RPA of 2 were included. Median TTI of GK treatment was 21 days (IQR: 14-29 days) while median distance traveled to the facility was 45.8 miles (IQR: 24.5-86.7 miles). For patients residing within 45.8 miles, median TTI was 22 days (IQR: 15-33 days) compared with a median TTI of 20.5 days (IQR: 13.75-27 days) for patients living beyond 45.8 miles. There was no statistical difference between groups based on age, diagnosis, or distance to center with respect to TTI (p=0.28). Despite geographical disadvantages in a rural population, including distance traveled for treatment, no significant delay in TTI was identified in patients treated with gamma knife for brain metastases.
Citation Format: Azeem A. Rehman, Sarah Singh, David Arsanious, Paul Renz, Christopher P. Cifarelli. Impact of distance traveled to radiosurgery center on time to initiation of gamma knife treatment for brain metastases in a rural patient population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1185.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Paul Renz
- West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Starke RM, McCarthy DJ, Chen CJ, Kano H, McShane B, Lee J, Mathieu D, Vasas LT, Kaufmann AM, Wang WG, Grills IS, Patibandla MR, Cifarelli CP, Paisan G, Vargo JA, Chytka T, Janouskova L, Feliciano CE, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Tonetti DA, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. Evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas in a multicenter international consortium. J Neurosurg 2020; 132:114-121. [PMID: 30611144 DOI: 10.3171/2018.8.jns181467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this multicenter study, the authors reviewed the results obtained in patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) and determined predictors of outcome. METHODS Data from a cohort of 114 patients who underwent GKRS for cerebral dAVFs were compiled from the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation. Favorable outcome was defined as dAVF obliteration and no posttreatment hemorrhage or permanent symptomatic radiation-induced complications. Patient and dAVF characteristics were assessed to determine predictors of outcome in a multivariate logistic regression analysis; dAVF-free obliteration was calculated in a competing-risk survival analysis; and Youden indices were used to determine optimal radiosurgical dose. RESULTS A mean margin dose of 21.8 Gy was delivered. The mean follow-up duration was 4 years (range 0.5-18 years). The overall obliteration rate was 68.4%. The postradiosurgery actuarial rates of obliteration at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years were 41.3%, 61.1%, 70.1%, and 82.0%, respectively. Post-GRKS hemorrhage occurred in 4 patients (annual risk of 0.9%). Radiation-induced imaging changes occurred in 10.4% of patients; 5.2% were symptomatic, and 3.5% had permanent deficits. Favorable outcome was achieved in 63.2% of patients. Patients with middle fossa and tentorial dAVFs (OR 2.4, p = 0.048) and those receiving a margin dose greater than 23 Gy (OR 2.6, p = 0.030) were less likely to achieve a favorable outcome. Commonly used grading scales (e.g., Borden and Cognard) were not predictive of outcome. Female sex (OR 1.7, p = 0.03), absent venous ectasia (OR 3.4, p < 0.001), and cavernous carotid location (OR 2.1, p = 0.019) were predictors of GKRS-induced dAVF obliteration. CONCLUSIONS GKRS for cerebral dAVFs achieved obliteration and avoided permanent complications in the majority of patients. Those with cavernous carotid location and no venous ectasia were more likely to have fistula obliteration following radiosurgery. Commonly used grading scales were not reliable predictors of outcome following radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Starke
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - David J McCarthy
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Brendan McShane
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Lee
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Mathieu
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec
| | - Lucas T Vasas
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Anthony M Kaufmann
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Wei Gang Wang
- 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Inga S Grills
- 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Mohana Rao Patibandla
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Gabriella Paisan
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John A Vargo
- 9Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Tomas Chytka
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; and
| | - Ladislava Janouskova
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; and
| | - Caleb E Feliciano
- 11Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ding D, Mehta GU, Patibandla MR, Lee CC, Liscak R, Kano H, Pai FY, Kosak M, Sisterson ND, Martinez-Alvarez R, Martinez-Moreno N, Mathieu D, Grills IS, Blas K, Lee K, Cifarelli CP, Katsevman GA, Lee JYK, McShane B, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Vance ML, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Acromegaly: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Neurosurgery 2020; 84:717-725. [PMID: 29757421 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a treatment option for persistent or recurrent acromegaly secondary to a growth hormone secreting pituitary adenoma, but its efficacy is inadequately defined. OBJECTIVE To assess, in a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of SRS for acromegaly and determine predictors. METHODS We pooled and analyzed data from 10 participating institutions of the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation for patients with acromegaly who underwent SRS with endocrine follow-up of ≥6 mo. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 371 patients with a mean endocrine follow-up of 79 mo. IGF-1 lowering medications were held in 56% of patients who were on pre-SRS medical therapy. The mean SRS treatment volume and margin dose were 3.0 cm3 and 24.2 Gy, respectively. The actuarial rates of initial and durable endocrine remission at 10 yr were 69% and 59%, respectively. The mean time to durable remission after SRS was 38 mo. Biochemical relapse after initial remission occurred in 9%, with a mean time to recurrence of 17 mo. Cessation of IGF-1 lowering medication prior to SRS was the only independent predictor of durable remission (P = .01). Adverse radiation effects included the development of ≥1 new endocrinopathy in 26% and ≥1 cranial neuropathy in 4%. CONCLUSION SRS is a definitive treatment option for patients with persistent or recurrent acromegaly after surgical resection. There appears to be a statistical association between the cessation of IGF-1 lowering medications prior to SRS and durable remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale Ding
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Gautam U Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Fu-Yuan Pai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mikulas Kosak
- 3rd Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Nathaniel D Sisterson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Kevin Blas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Kuei Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | | | - John Y K Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brendan McShane
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary Lee Vance
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.,Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cifarelli CP, Brehmer S, Vargo JA, Hack JD, Kahl KH, Sarria-Vargas G, Giordano FA. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for surgically resected brain metastases: outcome analysis of an international cooperative study. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:391-397. [PMID: 31654248 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03309-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The ideal delivery of radiation to the surgical cavity of brain metastases (BMs) remains the subject of debate. Risks of local failure (LF) and radiation necrosis (RN) have prompted a reappraisal of the timing and/or modality of this critical component of BM management. IORT delivered at the time of resection for BMs requiring surgery offers the potential for improved local control (LC) afforded by the elimination of delay in time to initiation of radiation following surgery, decreased uncertainty in target delineation, and the possibility of dose escalation beyond that seen in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study provides a retrospective analysis with identification of potential predictors of outcomes. METHODS Retrospective data was collected on patients treated with IORT immediately following surgical resection of BMs at three institutions according to the approval of individual IRBs. All patients were treated with 50kV portable linear accelerator using spherical applicators ranging from 1.5 to 4.0 cm. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS with endpoints of LC, DBC, incidence of RN, and overall survival (OS) and p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS 54 patients were treated with IORT with a median age of 64 years. The most common primary diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer (40%) with the most common location in the frontal lobe (38%). Median follow-up was 7.2 months and 1-year LC, DBC, and OS were 88%, 58%, and 73%, respectively. LMD was identified in 2 patients (3%) and RN present in 4 patients (7%). The only predictor of LC was extent of resection with 1-year LC of 94% for GTR versus 62% for STR (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS IORT is a safe and effective means of delivering adjuvant radiation to the BM resection cavities with high rates of LC and low incidence of RN. Further studies are warranted directly comparing LC outcomes to SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Suite 4300, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Joshua D Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Gustavo Sarria-Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, MacFawn I, Frisch SM. Abstract 3928: N-cadherin(CDH2) expression in mesenchymal glioblastoma modulates radiation sensitivity. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-3928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Radiation is a mainstay of treatment in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Despite maximal surgical and chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment, the disease remains uniformly fatal, with local disease recurrence within the previously radiated field comprising the major pattern of progression. According to the molecular subtyping of GBM, there is a predominance of mesenchymal GBM cells within the recurrent tumor mass, with characteristic increased expression of CD44, N-cadherin, L1CAM, TWIST1 and phosphorylated STAT3. Moreover, these populations of cells are known to be resistant to additional salvage radiation. The current study aims to evaluate the role of N-cadherin in the relative radiation resistance of mesenchymal subtype GBM.
Methods: Overall survival data from the TCGA was analyzed using Cox regression hazard ratios based on N-cadherin expression across multiple molecular subtypes of GBM along with age and MGMT covariates. Using the U3035 and U87MG cells, the analyses of N-cadherin expression or exogenous exposure in the setting of external beam radiation were performed via stable shRNA knockdowns or the use of recombinant human N-cadherin ectodomain-Fc fusion proteins in clonogenic survival assays. Orthotopic implantations were performed in NSG mice with the endpoints of overall survival and tumor size, as determined by luciferase imaging. Subcellular localization of RAD51 was accomplished by confocal microscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and GraphPad Prism with significance at p<0.05.
Results: N-cadherin expression above the median among the mesenchymal subtype of GBM in the TCGA dataset correlated with a significant decrease in overall survival (HR 1.924, p=0.029). The elimination of N-cadherin expression in normally high expressing U3035 GBM cells led to a significant increase in the ability of radiation to induce cell death in clonogenic assay (17.2% U3035 vs 2% U3035 Δ N-cadherin at 8Gy; 12.7% U3035 vs 1.75% U3035 Δ N-cadherin at 20Gy) and an increase in the presence of double stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) on TUNEL assay. N-cadherin ectodomain-Fc fusion protein exposure in U87 cells resulted in a decrease in NSG mouse mean OS (17.6±0.25 days) compared to control radiated mice (22.3±1.1 days). Conversely, N-cadherin knockdown in U3035 cells resulted in further decrease in tumor bioluminescence beyond that seen in 4Gy x 4 radiation treatment of native U3035 xenografts (21% vs 4% of baseline).
Conclusions: The reduction of N-cadherin expression in mesenchymal U3035 GBM cells increases the efficacy of radiation-induced cell death. This finding is accompanied by a decrease in the nuclear localization of RAD51 following DSBs induced by ionizing radiation, indicating a potential crosstalk between DNA damage repair mechanisms and calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion.
Citation Format: Christopher P. Cifarelli, J. Austin Vargo, Ian MacFawn, Steven M. Frisch. N-cadherin(CDH2) expression in mesenchymal glioblastoma modulates radiation sensitivity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3928.
Collapse
|
47
|
Cheyuo C, Rosen CL, Rai A, Cifarelli CP, Qaiser R. Venous Manometry as an Adjunct for Diagnosis and Multimodal Management of Intracranial Hypertension due to Meningioma Compressing Sigmoid Sinus. Cureus 2019; 11:e4953. [PMID: 31453027 PMCID: PMC6701896 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracranial venous hypertension is a rare presentation of meningiomas in the transverse-sigmoid sinus region. We describe a case of a young patient presenting with intracranial hypertension due to a meningioma causing compression of the dominant sigmoid sinus. We were able to document the cerebral venous pressure gradient across the lesion confirming our hypothesis that compression of the sigmoid sinus from the meningioma was the cause of intracranial hypertension. The patient is a 17-year-old male who presented with intracranial hypertension due to meningioma at the right dominant sigmoid sinus, which was treated by a Simpson grade IV surgical resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery. Following treatment, his papilledema resolved and he remains symptom-free at 18 months. In conclusion, venous manometry is a useful adjunct to diagnose intracranial hypertension in non-idiopathic causes of intracranial hypertension. A multimodal management approach of intracranial hypertension due to outflow obstruction from the dominant sinus led to an excellent recovery on follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cletus Cheyuo
- Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - Charles L Rosen
- Neurosurgery, Central Illinois Neuro Health Sciences, Bloomington, USA
| | - Ansaar Rai
- Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | | | - Rabia Qaiser
- Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vargo JA, Hack J, Singh R, Renz P, Jacobson GM, Cifarelli CP. Early Clinical Outcomes for Intraoperative Radiotherapy Following Resection of Large Brain Metastases. Brachytherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
49
|
Mohammed N, Ding D, Hung YC, Xu Z, Lee CC, Kano H, Martínez-Álvarez R, Martínez-Moreno N, Mathieu D, Kosak M, Cifarelli CP, Katsevman GA, Lunsford LD, Lee Vance M, Sheehan JP. Primary versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: a multicenter matched cohort study. J Neurosurg 2019; 132:1507-1516. [PMID: 31026829 DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.jns183398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with medically refractory acromegaly who are not operative candidates or who refuse resection is poorly understood. The aim of this multicenter, matched cohort study was to compare the outcomes of primary versus postoperative SRS for acromegaly. METHODS The authors reviewed an International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database of 398 patients with acromegaly who underwent SRS and categorized them into primary or postoperative cohorts. Patients in the primary SRS cohort were matched, in a 1:2 ratio, to those in the postoperative SRS cohort, and the outcomes of the 2 matched cohorts were compared. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 78 patients (median follow-up 66.4 months), including 26 and 52 in the matched primary and postoperative SRS cohorts, respectively. In the primary SRS cohort, the actuarial endocrine remission rates at 2 and 5 years were 20% and 42%, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that a lower pre-SRS insulin-like growth factor-1 level was predictive of initial endocrine remission (p = 0.03), whereas a lower SRS margin dose was predictive of biochemical recurrence after initial remission (p = 0.01). There were no differences in the rates of radiological tumor control (p = 0.34), initial endocrine remission (p = 0.23), biochemical recurrence after initial remission (p = 0.33), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.32), or hypopituitarism (p = 0.67) between the 2 matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Primary SRS has a reasonable benefit-to-risk profile for patients with acromegaly in whom resection is not possible, and it has similar outcomes to endocrinologically comparable patients who undergo postoperative SRS. SRS with medical therapy in the latent period can be used as an alternative to surgery in selected patients who cannot or do not wish to undergo resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Mohammed
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Dale Ding
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - David Mathieu
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; and
| | - Mikulas Kosak
- 73rd Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Gennadiy A Katsevman
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary Lee Vance
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Starke RM, McCarthy DJ, Chen CJ, Kano H, McShane BJ, Lee J, Patibandla MR, Mathieu D, Vasas LT, Kaufmann AM, Wang WG, Grills IS, Cifarelli CP, Paisan G, Vargo J, Chytka T, Janouskova L, Feliciano CE, Sujijantarat N, Matouk C, Chiang V, Hess J, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Tonetti DA, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. Hemorrhage risk of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas following Gamma Knife radiosurgery in a multicenter international consortium. J Neurosurg 2019; 132:1209-1217. [PMID: 30875690 DOI: 10.3171/2018.12.jns182208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors performed a study to evaluate the hemorrhagic rates of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) and the risk factors of hemorrhage following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS Data from a cohort of patients undergoing GKRS for cerebral dAVFs were compiled from the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. The annual posttreatment hemorrhage rate was calculated as the number of hemorrhages divided by the patient-years at risk. Risk factors for dAVF hemorrhage prior to GKRS and during the latency period after radiosurgery were evaluated in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 147 patients with dAVFs were treated with GKRS. Thirty-six patients (24.5%) presented with hemorrhage. dAVFs that had any cortical venous drainage (CVD) (OR = 3.8, p = 0.003) or convexity or torcula location (OR = 3.3, p = 0.017) were more likely to present with hemorrhage in multivariate analysis. Half of the patients had prior treatment (49.7%). Post-GRKS hemorrhage occurred in 4 patients, with an overall annual risk of 0.84% during the latency period. The annual risks of post-GKRS hemorrhage for Borden type 2-3 dAVFs and Borden type 2-3 hemorrhagic dAVFs were 1.45% and 0.93%, respectively. No hemorrhage occurred after radiological confirmation of obliteration. Independent predictors of hemorrhage following GKRS included nonhemorrhagic neural deficit presentation (HR = 21.6, p = 0.027) and increasing number of past endovascular treatments (HR = 1.81, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS Patients have similar rates of hemorrhage before and after radiosurgery until obliteration is achieved. dAVFs that have any CVD or are located in the convexity or torcula were more likely to present with hemorrhage. Patients presenting with nonhemorrhagic neural deficits and a history of endovascular treatments had higher risks of post-GKRS hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Starke
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - David J McCarthy
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Brendan J McShane
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Lee
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohana Rao Patibandla
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - David Mathieu
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lucas T Vasas
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Anthony M Kaufmann
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Wei Gang Wang
- 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Inga S Grills
- 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - Gabriella Paisan
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John Vargo
- 9Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Tomas Chytka
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ladislava Janouskova
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Caleb E Feliciano
- 11Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico; and
| | - Nanthiya Sujijantarat
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charles Matouk
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Veronica Chiang
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Judith Hess
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|