Comparison of first-line radiosurgery for small-cell and non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (CROSS-FIRE)

INTRODUCTION

Historical reservations regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases include concerns for short-interval and diffuse central nervous system (CNS) progression, poor prognoses, and increased neurological mortality specific to SCLC histology. We compared SRS outcomes for SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where SRS is well established.

METHODS

Multicenter first-line SRS outcomes for SCLC and NSCLC from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively collected (n = 892 SCLC, n = 4785 NSCLC). Data from the prospective Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society (JLGK0901) clinical trial of first-line SRS were analyzed as a comparison cohort (n = 98 SCLC, n = 814 NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard and Fine-Gray models, respectively, with multivariable adjustment for cofactors including age, sex, performance status, year, extracranial disease status, and brain metastasis number and volume. Mutation-stratified analyses were performed in propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive NSCLC, mutation-negative NSCLC, and SCLC.

RESULTS

OS was superior for patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset (median OS = 10.5 vs 8.6 months; P < .001) and in the JLGK0901 dataset. Hazard estimates for first CNS progression favoring NSCLC were similar in both datasets but reached statistical significance in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.73 to 0.92, P = .001). In the propensity score-matched cohorts, there were continued OS advantages for NSCLC patients (median OS = 23.7 [EGFR and ALK positive NSCLC] vs 13.6 [mutation-negative NSCLC] vs 10.4 months [SCLC], pairwise P values < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences in CNS progression were observed in the matched cohorts. Neurological mortality and number of lesions at CNS progression were similar for NSCLC and SCLC patients. Leptomeningeal progression was increased in patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.26, P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

After SRS, SCLC histology was associated with shorter OS compared to NSCLC. CNS progression occurred earlier in SCLC patients overall but was similar in patients matched on baseline factors. SCLC was not associated with increased neurological mortality, number of lesions at CNS progression, or leptomeningeal progression compared to NSCLC. These findings may better inform clinical expectations and individualized decision making regarding SRS for SCLC patients.

Macrophages as Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery: Novel Therapeutics for Central Nervous System Diseases

Many central nervous system (CNS) diseases were thought to be untreatable due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The chemokine gradients secreted from CNS parenchyma can induce macrophage migration to the brain, induce firm adherence to the endothelium of BBB, and eventually to enter the brain parenchyma. Macrophages migrating into CNS can promote neuron regeneration, induce inflammation and angiogenesis. These properties can potentially allow macrophages to act as carriers for drug/nano formulations across the BBB, and reach the potential target sites. Many nanomaterials cannot be used for the management of CNS diseases because of their low carrying efficiency. Macrophage which transports nanomaterials to pathological sites is rendered as an attractive tool for the transportation of drugs to previously inaccessible regions within the brain parenchyma. Nanomaterials engulfed by macrophages can be released at target sites, and be used for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. In this review, we focus on macrophages as the cell-carrier to deliver nano-drugs into CNS, describe the biological behavior of macrophages during pathological conditions and discuss the application of cell drug delivery system in recent years.

Evaluation of First-line Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: The FIRE-SCLC Cohort Study

Importance

Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred for limited brain metastases from most histologies, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with small cell lung cancer. Data on SRS are limited.

Objective

To characterize and compare first-line SRS outcomes (without prior WBRT or prophylactic cranial irradiation) with those of first-line WBRT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

FIRE-SCLC (First-line Radiosurgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer) was a multicenter cohort study that analyzed SRS outcomes from 28 centers and a single-arm trial and compared these data with outcomes from a first-line WBRT cohort. Data were collected from October 26, 2017, to August 15, 2019, and analyzed from August 16, 2019, to November 6, 2019.

Interventions

SRS and WBRT for small cell lung cancer brain metastases.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival, time to central nervous system progression (TTCP), and central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) after SRS were evaluated and compared with WBRT outcomes, with adjustment for performance status, number of brain metastases, synchronicity, age, sex, and treatment year in multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses.

Results

In total, 710 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 68.5 [62-74] years; 531 men [74.8%]) who received SRS between 1994 and 2018 were analyzed. The median overall survival was 8.5 months, the median TTCP was 8.1 months, and the median CNS PFS was 5.0 months. When stratified by the number of brain metastases treated, the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.9-13.4) for 1 lesion, 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-10.4) for 2 to 4 lesions, 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.6) for 5 to 10 lesions, and 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.6) for 11 or more lesions. Competing risk estimates were 7.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-9.2%) for local failures at 12 months and 41.6% (95% CI, 37.6%-45.7%) for distant CNS failures at 12 months. Leptomeningeal progression (46 of 425 patients [10.8%] with available data) and neurological mortality (80 of 647 patients [12.4%] with available data) were uncommon. On propensity score-matched analyses comparing SRS with WBRT, WBRT was associated with improved TTCP (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.55; P < .001), without an improvement in overall survival (median, 6.5 months [95% CI, 5.5-8.0] for SRS vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 4.4-6.7] for WBRT; P = .003) or CNS PFS (median, 4.0 months for SRS vs 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .79). Multivariable analyses comparing SRS and WBRT, including subset analyses controlling for extracranial metastases and extracranial disease control status, demonstrated similar results.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study suggest that the primary trade-offs associated with SRS without WBRT, including a shorter TTCP without a decrease in overall survival, are similar to those observed in settings in which SRS is already established.

CT versus MR Imaging in Estimating Cochlear Radiation Dose during Gamma Knife Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Leksell stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective option for patients with vestibular schwannomas. Some centers use a combination of stereotactic CT fused with stereotactic MR imaging to achieve an optimal target definition as well as minimize the radiation dose delivered to adjacent structures that correlate with hearing outcomes. The present prospective study was designed to determine whether there is cochlear dose variability between MR imaging and CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. Dose-planning was performed using high-definition fused stereotactic MR imaging and stereotactic CT images. The 3D cochlear volume was determined by delineating the cochlea on both CT and T2-weighted MR imaging. The mean radiation dose, maximum dose, and 3- and 4.20-Gy cochlear volumes were identified using standard Leksell Gamma Knife software.

RESULTS

The median mean radiation dose delivered to the cochlea was 3.50 Gy (range, 1.20-6.80 Gy) on CT and 3.40 Gy (range, 1-6.70 Gy) on MR imaging (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.86, r ² = 0.9, P ≤ .001). The median maximum dose delivered to the cochlea was 6.7 Gy on CT and 6.6 Gy on MR imaging (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.89, r ² = 0.90, P ≤ .001). Dose-volume histograms generated from CT and MR imaging demonstrated a strong level of correlation in estimating the 3- and 4.20-Gy volumes (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.81, r ² = 0.82, P ≤ .001 and concordance correlation coefficient = 0.87, r ² = 0.89, P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both MR imaging and CT provide similar cochlear dose parameters. Despite the reported superiority of CT in identifying bony structures, high-definition MR imaging alone is sufficient to identify the radiation doses delivered to the cochlea.