Low eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori with triple 7-14 days and quadriple therapy in Turkey

Efficacy of the Combination of Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, and Lansoprazole in the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Treatment-Naïve Patients and in Patients Who Are Not Responsive to Clarithromycin-Based Regimens: A Pilot Study

Background/Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the eradication rate of a triple therapy regimen that included a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and tetracycline instead of clarithromycin in treatment-Naïve patients and in patients who did not respond to standard triple therapy.

Methods

This study included 110 patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Patients in groups A and B were treatment-Naïve, and those in group C were not responsive to previous standard triple therapy. Patients in group A (n=40) received lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. Patients in groups B (n=40) and C (n=30) received lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. for 14 days.

Results

In group A, eradication was achieved in 18 (45%) of the 40 patients included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and in 18 (47.4%) of the 38 patients included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. In group B, eradication was achieved in 15 (37.5%) of the 40 patients included in the ITT analysis and in 15 (39.3%) of the 38 patients included in the PP analysis. In group C, eradication was achieved in 14 (46.6%) of the 30 patients included in the ITT analysis and in 14 (43.8%) of the 29 patients included in the PP analysis. There was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups with regard to eradication rates (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Despite the low rate of resistance to tetracycline, the combination of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and tetracycline instead of clarithromycin is not a good option for the eradication of H. pylori.

The oligo-acyl lysyl antimicrobial peptide C₁₂K-2β₁₂ exhibits a dual mechanism of action and demonstrates strong in vivo efficacy against Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori has developed antimicrobial resistance to virtually all current antibiotics. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop new anti-H. pylori therapies. We recently described a novel oligo-acyl-lysyl (OAK) antimicrobial peptidomimetic, C(12)K-2β(12), that shows potent in vitro bactericidal activity against H. pylori. Herein, we define the mechanism of action and evaluate the in vivo efficacy of C(12)K-2β(12) against H. pylori after experimental infection of Mongolian gerbils. We demonstrate using a 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (fluorescent probe) uptake assay and electron microscopy that C(12)K-2β(12) rapidly permeabilizes the bacterial membrane and creates pores that cause bacterial cell lysis. Furthermore, using nucleic acid binding assays, Western blots, and confocal microscopy, we show that C(12)K-2β(12) can cross the bacterial membranes into the cytoplasm and tightly bind to bacterial DNA, RNA, and proteins, a property that may result in inhibition of enzymatic activities and macromolecule synthesis. To define the in vivo efficacy of C(12)K-2β(12), H. pylori-infected gerbils were orogastrically treated with increasing doses and concentrations of C(12)K-2β(12) 1 day or 1 week postinfection. The efficacy of C(12)K-2β(12) was strongest in animals that received the largest number of doses at the highest concentration, indicating dose-dependent activity of the peptide (P < 0.001 by analysis of variance [ANOVA]) regardless of the timing of the treatment with C(12)K-2β(12). Overall, our results demonstrate a dual mode of action of C(12)K-2β(12) against the H. pylori membrane and cytoplasmic components. Moreover, and consistent with the previously reported in vitro efficacy, C(12)K-2β(12) shows significant in vivo efficacy against H. pylori when used as monotherapy. Therefore, OAK peptides may be a valuable resource for therapeutic treatment of H. pylori infection.

A new look at anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy

With the rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the treatment success of standard triple therapy has recently declined to unacceptable levels (i.e., 80% or less) in most countries. Therefore, several treatment regimens have emerged to cure Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Novel first-line anti-H. pylori therapies in 2011 include sequential therapy, concomitant quadruple therapy, hybrid (dual-concomitant) therapy and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. After the failure of standard triple therapy, a bismuth-containing quadruple therapy comprising a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole can be employed as rescue treatment. Recently, triple therapy combining a PPI, levofloxacin and amoxicillin has been proposed as an alternative to the standard rescue therapy. This salvage regimen can achieve a higher eradication rate than bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in some regions and has less adverse effects. The best second-line therapy for patients who fail to eradicate H. pylori with first-line therapies containing clarithromycin, amoxicillin and metronidazole is unclear. However, a levofloxacin-based triple therapy is an accepted rescue treatment. Most guidelines suggest that patients requiring third-line therapy should be referred to a medical center and treated according to the antibiotic susceptibility test. Nonetheless, an empirical therapy (such as levofloxacin-based or furazolidone-based therapies) can be employed to terminate H. pylori infection if antimicrobial sensitivity data are unavailable.

Effectiveness of ranitidine bismuth citrate and proton pump inhibitor based triple therapies of Helicobacter pylori in Turkey

Background

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease, MALT lymphoma, and adenocarcinoma of the stomach. The reported prevalence of H. pylori in the adult population in Turkey is 67.6%–81.3%. A national meta-analysis showed that the average H. pylori eradication rate with proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimens in Turkey had decreased from 84% in 1997 to 55.3% in 2004, suggesting a need to evaluate alternative regimens.

Materials and methods

The study was a prospective, single-center trial with a parallel group design. After the selection procedure, consecutive out-patients were assigned to one of six study groups using random sampling numbers. All patients received amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.i.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. along with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d., or omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., or rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., or esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. for 14 days.

Results

When we look at the eradication rates of the treatment groups, only two groups (ranitidine bismuth citrate and rabeprazole groups) had eradication rates greater than 80%, both at intention to treat and per protocol analyses. The other four groups (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole groups) showed statistically significant lower eradication rates both at intention to treat (between 57.6 and 66.7%) and per protocol (between 60.3 and 72.1%) analyses when compared with ranitidine bismuth citrate and rabeprazole groups (p<.05).

Conclusion

Ranitidine bismuth citrate and/or rabeprazole based triple therapies must be preferred for the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection.

Supplementing vitamins C and E to standard triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of currently accepted triple therapy regimens vary between geographic locations and do not exceed 70-80%. Eradication rates are much lower in locations where uncontrolled antibiotic use is common such as Turkey. In the present study, we aimed to test whether supplementing vitamins C and E to standard triple therapy, including a proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin plus clarithromycin, increased the H. pylori eradication rate.

METHODS

Two hundred patients infected with H. pylori were randomized into two groups in an open-label trial. In group A, patients (n = 160) were given standard triple therapy, including lansoprazole 30 mg BID plus amoxicillin 1000 mg BID plus clarithromycin 500 mg BID for 14 days, plus vitamin C 500 mg BID plus vitamin E 200 IU BID for 30 days. In group B, patients (n = 40) were given standard triple therapy for 14 days. The success of H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative ¹⁴C-urea breath test result, 4-6 weeks after the completion of therapy. Comaprisons were by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Two hundred patients (137 women, 63 men) were analysed using ITT analysis and 195 patients completed the study. In group A, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 132 of the 160 patients (82·5%) included in ITT analysis and 132 of the 157 patients (84%) included in PP analysis. In group B, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 18 of the 40 patients (45%) included in ITT analysis and 18 of the 38 patients (47·4%) included in PP analysis. Eradication rates were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P < 0·005). Eradication rates were not statistically significant between men and women in both groups.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Adding vitamins C and E to standard triple therapy increases the eradication rate of H. pylori. Vitamins C and E may increase the eradication rate via increasing the effectiveness of the antibiotics by decreasing oxidative stress in the gastric mucosa and strengthening the immune system.

A new modified concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have tended to decrease recently, mostly due to antibiotic resistance. In the present study, our aim was to determine Hp eradication rate with the LAC plus tid metronidazole regimen and the secondary objective of this study was to identify an effective regimen for our population.

METHODS

Eighty-four Hp-positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were assigned into the same group. Patients were administered the classical LAC protocole (lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid and claritromycin 500 mg bid for 14 days) plus metronidazole 500 mg tid for 14 days. Gastroscopy and histopathological assessment were performed before enrollment and C(14) urea breath test and stool antigen test were performed 6 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

All 84 patients completed the study. No patient left the study because of drug side effect. Total eradication rate was 75% (63/84).

CONCLUSION

Although LAC plus tid metronidazole regimen achieved a much better eradication rate compared with the standard LAC regimen; this is the first study that has a relatively low success with a concomitant therapy. So in areas of high resistance like Turkey, one cannot expect a high success with any clarithromycin containing regimen and those should be avoided.

Sequential metronidazole-furazolidone or clarithromycin-furazolidone compared to clarithromycin-based quadruple regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Furazolidone is a much cheaper drug with a very low resistance against Helicobacter pylori compared to clarithromycin. We aim to evaluate safety and efficacy of a sequential furazolidone-based regimen versus clarithromycin-based therapy in H. pylori eradication for ulcer disease.

MATERIALS

Patients with proven peptic ulcer or duodenitis were randomized into three groups: OAB-M-F; metronidazole (M) (500 mg bid) for the first 5 days, followed by furazolidone (F) (200 mg bid) for the second 5 days; OAC-P; clarithromycin (C) (500 mg bid) for 10 days; and OAB-C-F; clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for the first 5 days and furazolidone (200 mg bid) for the second 5 days. All groups received omeprazole (O) (20 mg bid) and amoxicillin (A) (1 g bid). Groups OAB-M-F and OAB-C-F were also given bismuth subcitrate (B) (240 mg bid), whereas a placebo (P) was given to group OAC-P. Adverse events were scored and recorded. Two months after treatment, a C(13) -urea breath test was performed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ten patients were enrolled and 92 (OAB-M-F), 95 (OAC-P), and 98 (OAB-C-F) completed the study. The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 78.5% (95% CI = 69-85), 81.1% (95% CI = 73-88), and 82% (95% CI = 74-89), and per-protocol eradication rates were 91.3% (95% CI = 83-96), 90.4% (95% CI = 82-95), and 88.7% (95% CI = 81-94), for group OAB-M-F, OAC-P, and OAB-C-F, respectively. Eradication rate differences did not reach statistical significance. The most common adverse event, bad taste, occurred in all groups, but more frequently in groups OAC-P (34%) and OAB-C-F (32%), than OAB-M-F (14%) (p < .05). Adverse symptoms score were 0.88 ± 2.05 in group OAB-M-F, 1.15 ± 1.40 in group OAC-P, and 1.87 ± 1.62 in group OAB-C-F.

CONCLUSION

Furazolidone can replace clarithromycin in H. pylori eradication regimens because of lack of development of resistance and very low cost.

Effect of the mucolytic erdosteine on the success rate of PPI-based first-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Because Helicobacter pylori creates a well-sheltered microenvironment within the gastric mucus layer, it has been speculated that the disruption of this space by a mucolytic agent may enhance the eradication rate. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of erdosteine, a strong mucolytic agent, on the effectiveness of PPI-based, first-line triple therapy in the eradication of H. pylori.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Initially, 196 patients were enrolled to the study. Of these, 79 H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to the erdosteine group (triple therapy consisting of pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin plus erdosteine; n = 40) or the placebo group (triple therapy plus placebo; n = 39) for 14 days. Endoscopic biopsies and (13)C-urea breath tests were performed at entry and at 4-6 weeks after the completion of the treatment. Additionally, rapid urease tests were performed at entry.

RESULTS

The eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 30 (75%) of the 40 patients in the erdosteine group and in 20 (51.3%) of the 39 patients in the placebo group, according to the ITT analysis (p = 0.028). When the PP analysis was performed as well, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 30 (78.9%) of the 38 patients in the erdosteine group and in 20 (52.6%) of the 38 patients in the placebo group (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Erdosteine is an efficient adjuvant therapy that could be used in conjunction with first-line triple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori.

Distribution of gyrA mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains

AIM: To investigate the resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX) and moxifloxacin (MOX) in the Beijing area and to elucidate the resistance mechanisms.

METHODS: Seventy-nine H. pylori clinical strains, isolated from patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Peking University First Hospital from 2007 to 2009, were tested for their susceptibility to CIP, LVX and MOX using the E-test method. H. pylori strain 26695 was included in the susceptibility testing as a control strain. According to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, a strain was classified as resistant to CIP, LVX or MOX when the MIC was > 1 μg/mL. We amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced the quinolone resistance-determining regions of the gyrA and gyrB genes from 29 quinolone-resistant and 16 quinolone-susceptible H. pylori strains selected at random.

RESULTS: In this study, the resistance rates of H. pylori to CIP, LVX or MOX were 55.7% (44/79), and the primary resistance rates were 26.6% (21/79). Patients with secondary resistance had received LVX in previous eradication treatments, but not MOX or CIP. Forty-five strains, including 29 CIP, LVX or MOX-resistant strains (MIC: 1.5-32 μg/mL) and 16 susceptible strains, were selected randomly from the 79 strains and used in PCR analysis. Among these 45 strains, 27 resistant strains had mutations in the gyrA gene, including 11 strains with mutations corresponding to Asp-91 (MIC: 2-32 μg/mL), one of which also had a mutation corresponding to Val-150, and 16 strains had mutations at Asn-87 (MIC: 4-32 μg/mL), three of which also had mutations corresponding to Arg-140 or Val-150. In addition, Arg-140, Val-150 or Ala-97 mutations were separately detected in three susceptible strains. Analysis of the gyrB gene showed that one strain of low resistance had a mutation corresponding to Ser-457 that coexisted with an Asp-91 mutation. There was a significant difference in the occurrence of mutations in the gyrA gene between CIP, LVX and MOX-resistant and -susceptible strains (P < 0.05), but 2 resistant strains were found to possess no quinolone resistance-determining region mutations.

CONCLUSION: Resistance is primarily mediated through point mutations in gyrA. Whether other mechanisms are responsible for resistance in strains without mutations in the QRDR should be detected.

A randomized controlled trial: efficacy and safety of azithromycin, ofloxacin, bismuth, and omeprazole compared with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, bismuth, and omeprazole as second-line therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection of the stomach is widespread among human populations and is considered to play a major role in the pathogenesis of various diseases such as peptic ulcer, adenocarcinoma, and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the stomach. To increase H. pylori eradication rate without increasing bacterial resistance, various regimens have been recommended. Commonly the association of at least two antibiotics with a proton-pump inhibitor is used. The treatment regimens for second-line therapy, suggested in studies from the western world may not be ideal in Iran.

AIM

In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new quadruple therapy regimen and compared it with the standard second-line treatment for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

We selected 220 H. pylori positive patients, with a clear indication of eradication therapy, who did not respond to a 2 weeks treatment with metronidazole, amoxicillin, omeprazole, and bismuth. They were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 110) were treated with azithromycin, ofloxacin, bismuth, and omeprazole and group B (n = 110) with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, bismuth, and omeprazole for 2 weeks. Four weeks after the end of treatment, urea breath test was performed for all subjects to confirm eradication.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 77.3% (85/110) and 64.5% (71/110) respectively (p = .027). In per-protocol analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 86.7 and 74.7%, respectively (p = .026). The incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly so, in group A than group B (3.5 vs 4.3%). No major adverse events occurred in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Two weeks of treatment with ofloxacin, azithromycin, omeprazole, and bismuth is an effective and safe regimen for H. pylori eradication as second-line therapy.

Comparison of the efficacy of the two tetracycline-containing sequential therapy regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: 5 days versus 14 days amoxicillin

AIM

To compare the efficacy of 14-day and 5-day amoxicillin treatment on the eradication rate during tetracycline containing sequential H. pylori therapy, and also to compare the eradication rate of this regimen with those used in similar studies performed in Turkey.

METHOD

This study included 112 patients infected with H. pylori that were randomized into 2 groups. In group A, patients (n = 56) received pantoprazole (40 mg BID) and amoxicillin (1 g BID) for 5 days, followed by pantoprazole (40 mg BID), tetracycline (500 mg QID), and metronidazole (500 mg TID) for the remaining 9 days. In group B, patients (n = 56) received pantoprazole (40 mg BID) and amoxicillin (1 g BID) for 5 days, followed by pantoprazole (40 mg BID), tetracycline (500 mg QID), metronidazole (500 mg TID), and amoxicillin (1 g BID) for the remaining 9 days. Eradication rates were calculated using both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS

In all, 112 patients were subjected to ITT analysis and 109 patients completed the study. In group A, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 46 (82.1%) of the 56 patients included in the ITT analysis and in 46 (83.6%) of the 55 patients included in the PP analysis. In group B, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 44 (78.57%) of the 56 patients included in the ITT analysis and in 44 (81.48%) of the 54 patients included in the PP analysis (Table 2). The eradication rates were not statistically significant between the 2 groups (p > .005).

CONCLUSION

Extended duration of amoxicillin treatment during the entire tetracycline containing sequential therapy period did not improve the H. pylori eradication rate. As a consequence, sequential therapy using 5-day amoxicillin is an acceptable first-line therapy option for the eradication of H. pylori in Turkey.

Second-line rescue therapy of helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main known cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease and gastric cancer. After more than 20 years of experience in H. pylori treatment, however, the ideal regimen to treat this infection has still to be found. Nowadays, apart from having to know well first-line eradication regimens, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (overall) eradication rate. The choice of a 'rescue' treatment depends on which treatment is used initially. If a first-line clarithromycin-based regimen was used, a second-line metronidazole-based treatment (quadruple therapy) may be used afterwards, and then a levofloxacin-based combination would be a third-line 'rescue' option. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that levofloxacin-based 'rescue' therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, with the advantage of efficacy, simplicity and safety. In this case, quadruple regimen may be reserved as a third-line 'rescue' option. Finally, rifabutin-based 'rescue' therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical fourth-line strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and levofloxacin. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H. pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several 'rescue' therapies are consecutively given. Therefore, the attitude in H. pylori eradication therapy failure, even after two or more unsuccessful attempts, should be to fight and not to surrender.

Triple or quadruple tetracycline-based therapies versus standard triple treatment for Helicobacter pylori treatment

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare lansoprazole-tetracycline-metranidazole (LTM) as first-line treatment with the classical lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (LAC) and bismuth-containing quadruple treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, randomized study included 464 consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with dyspeptic symptoms. A total of 415 patients completed the study. The patients were allocated into 4 study groups using random sampling numbers as follows-LAC group: lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 14 days; BLTM group: bismuth subcitrate 300 mg 4 times a day, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days; RBLTM group: ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg twice daily, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days; and LTM group: lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.

RESULTS

The per protocol H. pylori eradication rate in LAC, BLTM, RBLTM, and LTM groups were 37 of 104 (35.6%), 56 of 102 (54.9%), 67 of 104 (64.4%), and 63 of 105 (60%), respectively. The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 37 of 113 (32.7%) in LAC, 56 of 119 (47.1%) in BLTM, 67 of 117 (57.3%) in RBLTM, and 63 of 115 (54.8%) in LTM group. The BLTM, RBLTM, and LTM treatment groups achieved a significantly better eradication rate than the LAC treatment group (P < 0.001). There was not any significant statistical difference between the groups of BLTM, RBLTM, and LTM.

CONCLUSION

LTM treatment group achieved a significantly better eradication rate than the LAC treatment group. The success ratio of LTM therapy is comparable with quadruple bismuth-based treatments.

Oxidative stress in Helicobacter pylori infection: does supplementation with vitamins C and E increase the eradication rate?

AIM

This study aims to assess the antioxidant property of vitamins E and C in Helicobacter pylori infection, and to determine if adding them to standard triple therapy plus bismuth subcitrate increases the H. pylori eradication rate.

METHODS

This study included 160 patients infected with H. pylori, who were randomized into one of two groups. Patients in group A (n = 80) received lansoprazole (30 mg, b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg, b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.), and bismuth subcitrate (300 mg, q.i.d.) for 14 days, while patients in group B (n = 80) received vitamin C (500 mg, b.i.d.) and vitamin E (200 IU, b.i.d.) for 30 days, in addition to lansoprazole (30 mg, b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg, b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.), and bismuth subcitrate (300 mg, q.i.d.) for 14 days. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was evaluated with a Randox kit. Success rate was calculated using both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients were analyzed using ITT analysis. One hundred and fifty-three patients completed the study. In group A, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 48 (60%) of the 80 patients included in the ITT analysis, and in 48 (64%) of the 75 patients included in the PP analysis. In group B, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 73 (91.25%) of the 80 included in the ITT analysis and in 73 (93.5%) of the 78 patients included in the PP analysis. The eradication rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (p < .005). TAC was at the lower limit of normal in both groups and the difference between them was not statistically significant (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

In group B, H. pylori eradication rate was 91.25%, which is higher than the ideal 80% eradication rate. The results of the present study show that adding the prescribed doses of vitamins E and C to antimicrobial therapy is effective in eradicating H. pylori infection.

Furazolidone, amoxicillin, bismuth and rabeprazole quadruple rescue therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

AIM

To compare the efficacy and side effect profiles of three furazolidone and amoxicillin-based quadruple rescue therapies for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori).

METHODS

Patients who failed in the H pylori eradication therapy for at least one course were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A received rebaprazole 10 mg + amoxicillin 1 g + furazolidone 100 mg, and bismuth subcitrate 220 mg, twice daily for 1 wk; group B received the same regimen of group A but for 2 wk; and group C received the same regimen of group B, but furazolidone was replaced by furazolidone 100 mg three times daily. To record the side effect profiles at the end of the treatment, H pylori eradication was assessed with (13)C-urea breath test 4 wk after therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled including 28 males, and 20 patients in each group. The average age of the patients was 49.2 years, ranging from 18 to 84 years. H pylori eradication rates with per-protocol analysis were 82%, 89% and 90% in the three groups, respectively. Side effects were found in 11 patients, including mild dizziness, nausea, diarrhea and increased bowel movement. None of the 11 patients needed treatment for their side effects.

CONCLUSION

One- or two-week furazolidone and amoxicillin-based quadruple rescue therapy with a low dose furazolidone (100 mg bid) for the eradication of H pylori is effective. Extending the antibiotic course to 14 d could improve the eradication rates.

Helicobacter pylori eradication improves gastric histology and decreases serum gastrin, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II levels in patients with duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the gastric histopathology and serum gastrin-17 and pepsinogens profiles in patients with duodenal ulcer before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication in a population with a very high prevalence of H. pylori. At the same time we assessed the role of H. pylori density on these variables.

METHODS

Eighty Caucasian patients with H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer before treatment and 1 year after randomized eradication were studied. Among patients with unsuccessful eradication two groups were distinguished according to the data obtained after treatment: the group with negative rapid urease test and decreased bacterial density according to morphological score (partial elimination group); the group with positive rapid urease test and high bacterial density (failed eradication group).

RESULTS

One year after successful eradication, serum levels of gastrin-17, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II decreased. Similar changes of serum pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II levels were observed in patients with partial elimination of H. pylori infection. In the group with successful eradication, inflammation, activity, atrophy and number of lymphoid follicles in the antral mucosa fell. In the group with partial elimination, antral mucosa activity and H. pylori score reduced. Other morphological changes were statistically non-significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with duodenal ulcer after successful eradication have improvement of morphological and functional characteristics of gastric mucosa.

“Rescue” regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. After more than 20 years of experience in H pylori treatment, in my opinion, the ideal regimen to treat this infection is still to be found. Currently, apart from having to know first-line eradication regimens well, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (overall) eradication rate. The choice of a “rescue” treatment depends on which treatment is used initially. If a clarithromycin-based regimen was used initially, a subsequent metronidazole-based treatment (quadruple therapy) may be used afterwards, and then a levofloxacin-based combination would be a third “rescue” option. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, with the advantage of efficacy, simplicity and safety. In this case, a quadruple regimen may be reserved as a third-line rescue option. Finally, rifabutin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical fourth-line strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and levofloxacin. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several rescue therapies are consecutively given. Therefore, the attitude in H pylori eradication therapy failure, even after two or more unsuccessful attempts, should be to fight and not to surrender.

Empirical rescue therapy after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure: a 10-year single-centre study of 500 patients

BACKGROUND

Several 'rescue' therapies have been recommended to eradicate Helicobacter pylori, but they still fail in >20% of the cases, and these patients constitute a therapeutic dilemma.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of different 'rescue' therapies empirically prescribed during 10 years to 500 patients in whom at least one eradication regimen had failed to cure H. pylori infection.

DESIGN

Prospective single-centre study.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients in whom at least one eradication regimen had failed.

INTERVENTION

Rescue regimens included: (i) quadruple therapy with omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole; (ii) ranitidine bismuth citrate-tetracycline-metronidazole; (iii) omeprazole-amoxicillin-levofloxacin; and (iv) omeprazole-amoxicillin-rifabutin. Antibiotic susceptibility was unknown (rescue regimens were chosen empirically).

OUTCOME

Eradication was defined as a negative (13)C-urea breath test 4-8 weeks after completing therapy.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients were included (76% functional dyspepsia, 24% peptic ulcer). Compliance rates with first-, second- and third-line regimens were 92%, 92%, and 95%, respectively. Adverse effects were reported by 30%, 37%, and 55% of the patients receiving second-, third-, and fourth-line regimens. Overall, H. pylori cure rates with the second-, third-, and fourth-line rescue regimens were 70%, 74%, and 76%, respectively. Cumulative H. pylori eradication rate with four successive treatments was 99.5%.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to construct an overall treatment strategy to maximize H. pylori eradication, on the basis of administration of four consecutive empirical regimens; thus, performing bacterial culture even after a second or third eradication failure may not be necessary.

A pilot study evaluating sequential administration of a PPI-amoxicillin followed by a PPI-metronidazole-tetracycline in Turkey

BACKGROUND

There is no effective regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in our country. It may be due to the increasing prevalence of resistance to antibiotics used for the treatment of H. pylori. Recently, a study from Turkey has revealed that a new treatment scheme consisting of sequential administration of pantoprazole plus amoxicillin for 7 days followed by pantoprazole plus metronidazole, and tetracycline for the remaining 7 days was effective in the first-line treatment of H. pylori. Therefore, we aimed to confirm efficacy of a new therapy scheme in the first-line H. pylori eradication.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective, open label, single center, pilot study and included 32 patients infected with H. pylori diagnosed by both histologic examinations, rapid urease test and (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). The patients received a 14-day sequential regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1000 mg b.d. for 7 days and pantoprazole 40 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.d. and tetracycline 500 mg q.d. for the remaining 7 days). Eradication was assessed with (13)C-UBT 4 weeks after completion of the therapy. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were determined.

RESULTS

At intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate was 50% (16/32). For the per protocol analysis, the eradication rate was 57% (16/28). There were no significant adverse effects and treatment compliance was good.

CONCLUSION

A new therapy consisting of sequentially administered drugs for 14 days yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. This scheme was not efficient for H. pylori eradication in our region. Further investigations are needed to determine the effectiveness of this scheme in other regions of Turkey.

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori re-treatment: role of bacterial resistance

BACKGROUND

First-line Helicobacter pylori therapy fails in more than 20% of patients. Quadruple therapy is the suggested second-line therapy, but bismuth salts are not anymore available worldwide. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a levofloxacin-amoxycillin triple therapy as a second-line treatment, and the role of primary levofloxacin resistance.

METHODS

Forty patients, in whom first treatment with either standard 10-day triple or sequential therapy had failed, received 10-day triple therapy with rabeprazole (20mg b.d.), levofloxacin (250mg b.d.), and amoxycillin (1g b.d.). Cure rates were evaluated by the (13)C-urea breath test. Primary levofloxacin resistance was detected by culture.

RESULTS

Bacterial culture was available in 33 (82.5%) out 40 patients, and primary levofloxacin resistance was detected in 10 (30.3%) patients. Overall, 33 of 40 patients accepted to participate in this study, and all returned for follow-up after therapy. Compliance to the therapy was safe except 1 patient only who stopped earlier the treatment due to side effects (oral candidiasis). H. pylori infection was eradicated in 24 patients, accounting for a 72.7% (95% CI: 57-88) eradication rate at both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. The eradication rate was higher in patients harbouring levofloxacin-susceptible than resistant strains (75% versus 33.3%; P=0.074).

CONCLUSIONS

The eradication rate achieved by a levofloxacin-based re-treatment seems to be decreasing, and its efficacy is reduced in presence of levofloxacin resistance.

Low efficacy rate of moxifloxacin-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: in an observational study in a Turkish population

BACKGROUND

Standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori has an eradication rate of about 50% in Turkey. It may be due to an increased resistance of H. pylori to antibiotics. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a new second-generation fluoroquinolone, moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy in H. pylori eradication.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an open-label, prospective, single-center, pilot study. We studied 71 dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori diagnosed by both histology and rapid urease test. Out of 71 dyspeptic patients, 64 had non-ulcer dyspepsia and seven had peptic ulcer. Patients received pantoprazole (40 mg b.i.d.) plus moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 14 days. Eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completing the therapy by histology and rapid urease test. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were determined.

RESULTS

The eradication rate was 42.2% for the intention-to-treat analysis and 47.6% for the per-protocol analysis. Of all patients included in the study, 29.5% had side-effects and only 2.8% of the patients discontinued the treatment because of side-effects. Most of the complications were mild and self-limiting.

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy with pantoprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin for 14 days yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. However, using tests of susceptibility to antibiotics, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to judge these eradication rates of moxifloxacin containing eradication treatment.

The sequential therapy regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a pooled-data analysis

BACKGROUND

Standard triple therapies are the most used treatment in clinical practice. However, a critical fall in the H pylori eradication rate following these therapies has been observed in the last few years. The sequential regimen is a novel, promising therapeutic approach.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the available data on the sequential therapy regimen.

METHODS

A pooled-data analysis of all studies on the sequential regimen was performed. The eradication rate was calculated according to gastroduodenal pathology, proton pump inhibitor used, antibiotic resistance, as well as setting (paediatric or geriatric patients). Compliance, side effects, and cost implications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, more than 1800 patients have been treated with the sequential regimen. Such a therapy was superior to 7-10 days triple therapies in paediatric, adult and elderly patients, achieving an eradication rate constantly higher than 90% at ITT analysis. Although primary clarithromycin resistance reduced the efficacy of such a therapy, a success rate significantly higher than that observed with the standard 7-10 days triple therapies was found.

CONCLUSION

The 10-day sequential treatment regimen achieves higher eradication rates than standard triple therapies.

The sequential therapy regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a pooled-data analysis

BACKGROUND

Standard triple therapies are the most used treatment in clinical practice. However, a critical fall in the H pylori eradication rate following these therapies has been observed in the last few years. The sequential regimen is a novel, promising therapeutic approach.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the available data on the sequential therapy regimen.

METHODS

A pooled-data analysis of all studies on the sequential regimen was performed. The eradication rate was calculated according to gastroduodenal pathology, proton pump inhibitor used, antibiotic resistance, as well as setting (paediatric or geriatric patients). Compliance, side effects, and cost implications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, more than 1800 patients have been treated with the sequential regimen. Such a therapy was superior to 7-10 days triple therapies in paediatric, adult and elderly patients, achieving an eradication rate constantly higher than 90% at ITT analysis. Although primary clarithromycin resistance reduced the efficacy of such a therapy, a success rate significantly higher than that observed with the standard 7-10 days triple therapies was found.

CONCLUSION

The 10-day sequential treatment regimen achieves higher eradication rates than standard triple therapies.

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either quadruple regimen with lactoferrin or levofloxacin-based triple therapy: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard triple therapy is decreasing worldwide. A quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a levofloxacin-based triple therapy has been found to achieve a very high (>90%) cure rate. This study aimed to confirm these encouraging results.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre, Italian study enrolling consecutive H. pylori infected patients. The infection at entry was assessed by endoscopy and biopsies (histology plus rapid urease test) in all patients, whilst bacterial eradication was assessed by 13C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after therapy ended. Patients were randomised to receive either a 7-day, triple therapy with rabeprazole 20mg o.d., levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (4 tablets/day) or a 7-day quadruple therapy comprising of rabeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, tinidazole 500 mg plus bovine lactoferrin 200mg, all given twice daily (10 tablets/day).

RESULTS

Overall, 144 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Following the triple therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 49 out of 72 (68.1%; 95% CI=57-79) patients and in 49 out of 71 (69.1%; 95% CI=58-80) at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 52 out of 72 (72.2%; 95% CI=62-83) and in 52 out of 68 (76.5; 95% CI=66-87) patients at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapy regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication rate following both quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a low-dose PPI, triple therapy with levofloxacin is disappointingly low.

First-line triple therapy with levofloxacin for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

At present, the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin regimen is relatively low.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a first-line triple clarithromycin-free regimen including ranitidine bismuth citrate, levofloxacin and amoxicillin.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

PATIENTS

Helicobacter pylori-positive patients complaining of dyspeptic symptoms referred for gastroscopy.

INTERVENTION

Levofloxacin (500 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) and ranitidine bismuth citrate (400 mg b.d.) was prescribed for 10 days.

OUTCOME

Eradication was confirmed by a (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after therapy. Compliance with therapy was determined by questioning and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Incidence of adverse effects was evaluated by means of a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included (30% peptic ulcer, 70% functional dyspepsia). Almost all (97%) patients took all the medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 88.5% (95% CI =78-95%) and 84.4 (74-91%). Adverse effects were reported in 9.5% of the patients, mainly including diarrhoea (7.9%); none of them were severe.

CONCLUSION

This new 10-day levofloxacin-based combination represents an alternative to clarithromycin-based therapy, as it meets the criteria set for regimens used as primary H. pylori treatment: effectiveness (>80%), simplicity (twice-daily dosing and excellent compliance) and safety (low incidence of adverse effects).

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with triple therapy: an epidemiologic analysis of trends in Turkey over 10 years

BACKGROUND

There is increasing concern about the efficacy of current regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined rates of H. pylori eradication with a commonly used triple-therapy regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin in trials performed in Turkey from 1996 to 2005. It also investigated the relationship between eradication rates and the duration of treatment (7, 10, or 14 days), choice of PPI, and indication for treatment (dyspepsia or peptic ulcer).

METHODS

This was a retrospective epidemiologic analysis. Articles concerning H. pylori eradication in Turkey that were published in peer-reviewed national and international journals were identified through searches of MEDLINE using the terms Helicobacter, eradication, and Turkey, and of the Turkish Medical Index using the terms Helicobacter and eradication. Abstracts from the Turkish Gastroenterology Congress from 1996 through 2005 were searched manually. Open-label trials, controlled trials, treatment arms, and case series that included a triple-therapy regimen consisting of standard doses of any PPI (omeprazole 20 mg BID, lansoprazole 30 mg BID, pantoprazole 40 mg BID, or esomeprazole 40 mg BID) with clarithromycin 500 mg BID and amoxicillin 1 g BID for 7 to 14 days were selected for analysis. Trials including patients who had undergone a previous attempt at eradication of H. pylori were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 138 trials or treatment arms identified, 94 met the criteria for inclusion (3637 subjects). The pooled eradication rate was 68.8% (95% CI, 67.3-70.3). A marked decrease in eradication was noted after 2000. Pooled eradication rates each year from 1996 through 2005 were 79.4%, 83.7%, 81.8%, 81.8%, 75.1%, 61.3%, 65.6%, 65.1%, 55.3%, and 61.1%, respectively. Eradication rates were not affected by the duration of treatment, choice of PPI, or indication for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of H. pylori eradication with the triple-therapy regimen decreased in Turkey over the 10-year period studied. In an era of increasing clarithromycin use, the effectiveness of this regimen for H. pylori eradication appears to require reassessment.

Azithromycin in one week quadruple therapy for H pylori eradication in Iran

AIM: To investigate eradication rates, patient compliance and tolerability of a 1-wk Azithromycin-based quadruple therapy versus the 2-wk conventional therapy.

METHODS: A total of 129 H pylori-positive patients were randomized to either omeprazole 20 mg, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, azithromycin 250 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all twice daily for 1-wk (B-OAzM) or omeprazole 20 mg, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, amoxicillin 1g, and metronidazole 500 mg all twice daily for 2-wk (B-OAM). H pylori infection was defined at entry by histology and rapid urease test and cure of infection was determined by negative urea breath test.

RESULTS: H pylori eradication rates produced by B-OAzM and B-OAM were 74.1% and 70.4% respectively based on an intention to treat analysis, and 78.1% versus 75.7% respectively based on a per-protocol analysis. The incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly so, in patients randomized to B-OAzM than for B-OAM (3.5% versus 4.3%) but intolerability was similar in the two groups ( 35% versus 33.3%).

CONCLUSION: 1-wk azithromycin based quadruple regimen achieves an H pylori eradication rate comparable to that of standard 2-wk quadruple therapy, and is associated with comparable patient compliance and complications.

Factors associated with the development of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication

We investigated whether Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication increases the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) in patients with peptic ulcers. From 2001-2005 consecutive out patients with peptic ulcers and HP received eradication and were followed endoscopically. HP was cured in 119 and RE developed in 33 of the 153 patients. RE developed in 24 of the 119 HP-eradicated patients and 9 of the 34 HP-persistent patients. The estimated RE occurrence rate within 1 year was higher in the HP-eradicated patients than in the HP-persistent patients, but it was reversed at 2 years by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. In 76 patients follow up for > or = 18 months, hiatal hernia, duodenal ulcer, and eradication failure were significantly associated with the increased RE rate by univariate and multivariate analysis. The follow-up period after HP eradication affected the RE occurrence rate, and eradication failure significantly increased the RE development in patients followed up for > or = 18 months.

Second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication after sequential therapy failure: a pilot study

A 64-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for abdominal fullness and constipation. In the pelvic cavity, an abdominal CT scan revealed massive ascites showing malignancy on histological examination. Upper GI endoscopy revealed type 3 gastric cancer from the anglus to the cardia. A barium-enema showed a stenotic lesion at the sigmoid colon due to peritoneal dissemination. An abnormally high CA125(1,400 mg/ml) level was detected in serum. We performed systemic chemotherapy of TS-1, CDDP and peritoneal infusion of docetaxel on the nonresected gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. After 2 cycles, cytology of ascites revealed no malignancy, and the serum CA125 value regained its normal level. After 3 cycles, the killer cell effect was recognized by laparoscopic examination and the stenotic change of sigmoid colon had almost disappeared. The patient clinically achieved good QOL by this method, which was very effective for nonresected gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination.

One-week once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, levofloxacin and azithromycin compared to a standard therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Primary antibiotic-resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori eradication failure of standard regimens.

AIM

To investigate eradication rate, patient compliance and tolerability of a 1-week once-daily levofloxacin plus azithromycin triple therapy versus the standard twice-daily triple therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 164 H. pylori-positive patients were randomised to either esomeprazole 20mg, levofloxacin 500 mg and azithromycin 500 mg once-daily (ELAz) or esomeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1g twice-daily (ECA) for 1 week. H. pylori infection was defined at entry by histology and urea breath test; cure of infection was determined both by negative urea breath test and H. pylori stool antigens.

RESULTS

H. pylori eradication rates of ELAz and ECA were similar at intention-to-treat (both 65%) and per-protocol analyses (70% versus 76%, respectively). Incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly, in patients randomised to ELAz than to ECA (4% versus 10%); tolerability was significantly higher for ELAz than for ECA (88% versus 70%; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily levofloxacin plus azithromycin-based triple therapy achieves an H. pylori eradication rate comparable to that of standard twice-daily triple therapy, but is associated with higher patient compliance and might even be better tolerated.