The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews

Novel germline mutations in the PTEN tumour suppressor gene found in women with multiple cancers

Germline mutations in PTEN can predispose people to Cowden syndrome (CS) and Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley (BRR) syndrome, rare, autosomal dominantly inherited neoplastic disorders. To determine whether germline mutations in PTEN contribute to genetic predisposition to multiple primary tumours within the general population, we conducted a nested case-control study, among 32 826 members of the prospective Nurses' Health Study cohort; cases were women with more than one primary tumour at different anatomical sites. We screened all nine exons of PTEN and flanking intronic splice sites for all 103 eligible cases using SSCP and sequencing. We observed two novel germline heterozygous missense mutations in exon 5 in five of the cases; three were V119L and two were V158L. Neither mutation was observed in 115 controls free of diagnosed cancer (p = 0.02). Both mutants showed partial tumour suppressor activity when compared to wild type PTEN when transfected into a PTEN null breast cancer cell line. The phenotype was cell line specific suggesting that genetic background affects growth suppression activity of the mutants. These data provide evidence that germline mutations in PTEN may be a more frequent predisposing factor for cancers in women than previously suggested.

Psychological adjustment to familial genetic risk assessment: differences in two longitudinal samples

Heritable cancer risk assessment is an increasingly common method of deriving valuable information relevant to deciding on appropriate screening regimens and preventive treatments. Assessments of heritable risk typically include familial-genetic evaluation, where analyses relate family pedigree to cancer risk, and DNA testing, where analyses indicate genetic mutations associated with cancer risk (e.g., BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations) or their absence. In this paper we report on the psychological responses of women given familial-genetic evaluations for ovarian cancer risk. The baseline and 6 to 12 follow-up assessments of an initial clinic-attending cohort of 65 women are compared with the baseline and 9 to 12 follow-up assessments of a second clinic-attending cohort of 60 women. Sizeable differences were found in the prevalence of clinically significant depression in these two physician or self-referred populations, as assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale and in the mean scores. Hypotheses accounting for these differences are discussed.

Testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the southeastern United States

OBJECTIVES

To detail characterization of mutations and uncharacterized variants in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, as observed in a population of breast cancer patients from the southeastern United States, and to examine baseline characteristics of women referred for counseling and testing and provide a preliminary look at how counseling and testing affected intentions toward prophylactic surgery.

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes give rise to a dramatically increased risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer or both. There are many reports about special populations in which deleterious mutations are present at a high frequency. It is useful to study these genes in more heterogeneous populations, reflecting different geographic regions. Interest in preventive surgery for gene carriers is high in women and their surgeons.

METHODS

Women were recruited through a prospective clinical trial of counseling and free genetic testing. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were screened for mutations using standard techniques, and results were given to participants. Baseline questionnaires determined interest in preventive surgery at the beginning of the study. Follow-up questionnaires for those who completed testing surveyed interest in prophylactic surgery after counseling and receiving test results.

RESULTS

Of 213 women who completed counseling and testing, 44 (20.6%) had 29 separate mutations; there were 11 Jewish women carrying three founder mutations. Twenty-eight women (13.1%) had uncharacterized variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2; nine were not previously reported. Women overestimated their chances of possessing a deleterious gene mutation compared to a statistical estimate of carrier risk. A number of women changed their intentions toward preventive surgery after genetic counseling and testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Hereditary breast cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was a heterogeneous syndrome in the southeastern United States. Most mutations were seen just once, and uncharacterized variants were common and of uncertain clinical significance. In general, positive test results tended to reinforce intentions toward prophylactic surgery. In contrast, women not interested in surgery at the time of entry tended to remain reluctant after testing and counseling.

VCP, a weak ATPase involved in multiple cellular events, interacts physically with BRCA1 in the nucleus of living cells

BRCA1, a breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, undergoes mutations in as many as 50% of familial breast tumors. Recent studies indicate that BRCA1 may be involved in DNA damage repair. Here, we demonstrate that the BRCA1 protein physically associates with valosin-containing protein (VCP), a member of the ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities (AAA) superfamily. In vitro studies revealed that VCP, via its N- terminal region, binds to amino acid residues 303-625 in the BRCA1 protein. Although found predominantly in the cytoplasm and, less abundantly, in the nucleus, VCP can be translocated from the nucleus after stimulation with epidermal growth factor. Collectively, our results suggest that VCP, by binding to BRCA1, participates in the DNA damage-repair function as an ATP transporter, possibly facilitating the transcription-coupled repair.

Prophylactic surgery in women with a hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To review the published literature on the efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic mastectomy (PM) and prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) in women with a hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer and to provide management recommendations for these women.

METHODS

Using the terms "prophylactic," "preventive," "bilateral," "mastectomy," "oophorectomy," and "ovariectomy," a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature for articles related to PM and PO was performed. The bibliographies of these articles were reviewed to identify additional relevant references.

RESULTS

There have been no prospective trials of PM or PO for the reduction of breast cancer or ovarian cancer incidence or mortality. Most of the available retrospective studies are composed of women who had surgery for a variety of indications and in whom genetic risk was not well characterized. However, some reports in women at increased risk of breast or ovarian cancer have shown that PM and PO can reduce cancer incidence.

CONCLUSION

Interest in and use of PM and PO are high among physicians and high-risk women. PM and PO seem to be associated with considerable reduction in the risk of breast and ovarian cancer, albeit incomplete. The surgical morbidity of PM and PO is low, but the complications of premature menopause may be significant, and few studies address quality-of-life issues in women who have opted for PM and PO. Management recommendations for high-risk individuals are presented on the basis of the available evidence.

Women's health and the environment: innovations in science and policy

Current scientific findings indicate that environmental factors affect women's health. Specifically, evidence has accumulated on the effects of the environment on reproductive health, cancer, injury, respiratory problems, autoimmune diseases, and other health problems. To review the current state of the science and policies related to women's health and the environment, the Federal Interagency Working Group on Women's Health and the Environment of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Society for Women's Health Research jointly sponsored a conference in 1998 entitled Women's Health and the Environment: Innovations in Science and Policy. The aim of the conference was to provide a forum for scientists to share recent findings, promising avenues of research, methodological barriers, and data gaps about women's susceptibility to environmental agents. The conference generated 22 recommendations for policy, 17 recommendations for communication and training, and 48 recommendations for research to be considered by the federal government. The purpose of this review is to bring to the attention of the scientific community and policymakers the breadth of the women's health implications associated with environmental factors by highlighting key research findings presented at the conference. This review summarizes the current status of science in women's health, it describes relevant activities by the federal government, and it suggests recommendations for future research and policy initiatives in the context of women's health and the environment.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in male breast cancer patients in Canada

Men who inherit a mutation in the BRCA2 gene carry a 6% risk of developing breast cancer by the age of 70. The proportion of male breast cancers attributable to BRCA mutations has not yet been determined with accuracy. We studied a series of 14 male breast cancer patients, unselected for family history or ethnicity, who were treated at a single regional cancer center in Canada. Family histories were obtained, and the men were tested for germ-line mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Seven of these patients had a significant family history of breast cancer (i.e., at least one first- or second-degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed before age 70). Two of the men carried BRCA2 mutations, but no BRCA1 mutations were found. Both mutation carriers reported a positive family history and a personal history of cancer that preceded their diagnosis of breast cancer. Our results support the recommendation that male breast cancer patients who have a significant family history of breast or ovarian cancer should be offered genetic counseling and testing.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis of 208 Ashkenazi Jewish women with ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a component of the autosomal-dominant hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome and may be due to a mutation in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Two mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and one mutation in BRCA2 (6174delT) are common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. One of these three mutations is present in approximately 2% of the Jewish population. Each mutation is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, and it is expected that a significant proportion of Jewish women with ovarian cancer will carry one of these mutations. To estimate the proportion of ovarian cancers attributable to founding mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Jewish population and the familial cancer risks associated with each, we interviewed 213 Jewish women with ovarian cancer at 11 medical centers in North America and Israel and offered these women genetic testing for the three founder mutations. To establish the presence of nonfounder mutations in this population, we also completed the protein-truncation test on exon 11 of BRCA1 and exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2. We obtained a detailed family history on all women we studied who had cancer and on a control population of 386 Ashkenazi Jewish women without ovarian or breast cancer. A founder mutation was present in 41.3% of the women we studied. The cumulative incidence of ovarian cancer to age 75 years was found to be 6.3% for female first-degree relatives of the patients with ovarian cancer, compared with 2.0% for the female relatives of healthy controls (relative risk 3.2; 95% CI 1.5-6.8; P=.002). The relative risk to age 75 years for breast cancer among the female first-degree relatives was 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-3.0; P=.0001). Only one nonfounder mutation was identified (in this instance, in a woman of mixed ancestry), and the three founding mutations accounted for most of the observed excess risk of ovarian and breast cancer in relatives.

Score tests for familial correlation in genotyped-proband designs

In the genotyped-proband design, a proband is selected based on an observed phenotype, the genotype of the proband is observed, and then the phenotypes of all first-degree relatives are obtained. The genotypes of these first-degree relatives are not observed. Gail et al. [(1999) Genet Epidemiol] discuss likelihood analysis of this design under the assumption that the phenotypes are conditionally independent of one another given the observed and unobserved genotypes. Li and Thompson [(1997) Biometrics 53:282-293] give an example where this assumption is suspect, thus suggesting that it is important to develop tests for conditional independence. In this paper, we develop a score test for the conditional independence assumption in models that might include covariates or observation of genotypes for some of the first degree relatives. The problem can be cast more generally as one of score testing in the presence of missing covariates. A standard analysis would require specifying a distribution for the covariates, which is not convenient and could lead to a lack of model-robustness. We show that by considering a natural conditional likelihood, and basing the score test on it, a simple analysis results. The methods are applied to a study of the penetrance for breast cancer of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Ashkenazi Jews.

Cancer genetics in primary care. When is genetic screening an option and when is it the standard of care?

In some families, predisposition to cancer is caused by a germline mutation in a single gene, which produces an autosomal dominant pattern of cancer transmission. Several hereditary cancer syndromes have been identified and for many of them, genetic testing is clinically available. Determining which patients are at risk for hereditary cancer begins by taking a complete family history. In particular, a three-generation family history and pedigree can provide valuable information for both patients and primary care physicians. When the history supports the possibility of hereditary cancer, a qualified genetic professional can assist with specific advice about testing and treatment options for the entire family. If pedigree analysis substantiates a heritable form of cancer, patients should be thoroughly informed about potential benefits, limitations, and risks of genetic screening and offered testing as appropriate. The ultimate goal is to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality through interventions that decrease cancer risk or increase early detection.

Frequency of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in a population-based sample of young breast carcinoma cases

BACKGROUND

There is a clear and growing need for data regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies among breast carcinoma cases not specifically ascertained on the basis of extreme family history profiles. Toward this end, the authors previously reported results with regard to BRCA1 in breast carcinoma patients drawn from a population-based study. In the current study the authors present new findings concerning BRCA2 mutation frequency in this same population, as well as summary data regarding the combined contribution of these two genes.

METHODS

Subjects were drawn from two population-based, case-control studies of breast carcinoma in young women conducted in western Washington State and focused on 1) women diagnosed with breast carcinoma before age 35 years (n = 203); and 2) women with a first-degree family history of breast carcinoma who were diagnosed before age 45 years (n = 225). Similarities and differences between BRCA2 carriers and BRCA1 carriers were analyzed in terms of age at diagnosis, family history status, and disease features.

RESULTS

Of cases diagnosed before age 35 years, all of whom were unselected for family history, 9.4% carried germline mutations (3.4% for BRCA2 and 5.9% for BRCA1). Of cases diagnosed before age 45 years who had a first-degree family history of breast carcinoma, 12.0% carried germline mutations (4.9% for BRCA2 and 7.1% for BRCA1). Increased frequencies of mutations were observed in cases with a personal or family history of early age at diagnosis and in those with four or more family members affected with breast carcinoma. BRCA2 mutations were less common than BRCA1 mutations in families with any history of ovarian carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, given current constraints on health care resources, these data suggest that screening for germline mutations in these breast carcinoma susceptibility genes may have the greatest impact on overall health care if it is prioritized toward high and moderate risk populations.

Hereditary cancer and developmental abnormalities

About 1% of all cancers are hereditary, caused by germ-line mutations in specific cancer-related genes. More than 25 different hereditary cancer syndromes are known, most of them involving mutations in tumor suppressor genes. These genes, which are related to cellular proliferation, might also be involved in differentiation. Hence, the phenotype of hereditary cancer syndromes might include developmental abnormalities, in addition to cancer predisposition. The information summarized here indicates that developmental phenotypes appear in both human patients and mouse models of the various hereditary cancer syndromes. These developmental abnormalities, which involve a variety of tissues and organs, usually lead to embryonic malformation that prevents the birth of viable homozygous offspring, but can also be detected in heterozygotes. In some of the syndromes a correlation exists between tumor types and developmentally affected tissues. Comparison of mice and human phenotypes from both the cancer and the developmental aspects indicates that many of the mouse models mimic the human syndromes. Our analysis indicates that most tumor suppressor genes participate not only in the regulation of cell proliferation, but also in differentiation and embryogenesis.

A rapid fluorescent multiplexed-PCR analysis (FMPA) for founder mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

Mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for approximately 80% of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families, but the size of these two genes makes mutation analysis time-consuming and technically challenging. In some populations such as the Ashkenazi Jewish and the French-Canadian, a small number of recurrent founder mutations account for the majority of mutations in cancer families. We have therefore developed two rapid genetic screening tests, which allow us to detect three frequent frameshift mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population and five frameshift mutations in the French-Canadian population. These fluorescent non-radioactive methods permit the simultaneous detection of multiple mutations by generating multiplexed PCR-amplified gene fragments, and by discriminating these on the basis of their size in a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Using these methods, we were able to correctly identify all mutants in a blinded analysis of 276 DNA samples, including 30 derived from paraffin-embedded tumor samples and 10 from buccal-cell brushes, with no false positive or false negative results. These techniques designed for the direct detection of recurrent mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, have the advantages of being efficient, sensitive, cost-effective, and are applicable to large scale screening for epidemiologic studies.

Bias and efficiency in family-based gene-characterization studies: conditional, prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods

We revisit the usual conditional likelihood for stratum-matched case-control studies and consider three alternatives that may be more appropriate for family-based gene-characterization studies: First, the prospective likelihood, that is, Pr(D/G,A second, the retrospective likelihood, Pr(G/D); and third, the ascertainment-corrected joint likelihood, Pr(D,G/A). These likelihoods provide unbiased estimators of genetic relative risk parameters, as well as population allele frequencies and baseline risks. The parameter estimates based on the retrospective likelihood remain unbiased even when the ascertainment scheme cannot be modeled, as long as ascertainment only depends on families' phenotypes. Despite the need to estimate additional parameters, the prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods can lead to considerable gains in efficiency, relative to the conditional likelihood, when estimating genetic relative risk. This is true if baseline risks and allele frequencies can be assumed to be homogeneous. In the presence of heterogeneity, however, the parameter estimates assuming homogeneity can be seriously biased. We discuss the extent of this problem and present a mixed models approach for providing consistent parameter estimates when baseline risks and allele frequencies are heterogeneous. The efficiency gains of the mixed-model prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods relative to the efficiency of conditional likelihood are small in the situations presented here.

Prevention of breast cancer

With the advent of screening and the increased incidence of breast cancer, concern for the prevention of breast cancer has become forefront in today's society. Determining individual risk is the key to prescribing prevention. Prevention of breast cancer is still under clinical investigation with only one drug, tamoxifen, showing benefit in high risk patients. This paper reviews the possible sites for prevention of neoplastic transformation via biomarkers in a breast cell as well as the investigational drugs and their potential use in the chemoprevention of breast cancer.

Prophylactic mastectomy; evolving perspectives

It is not at all uncommon for surgeons dealing with breast disease to be confronted with the issue of prophylactic mastectomy. Recent advances in understanding the genetic basis of susceptibility to breast cancer and a better identification of the histological factors affecting a woman's lifetime risk of developing breast cancer have contributed to placing prophylactic mastectomy in a proper clinical perspective. Existing data suggest that prophylactic total mastectomy significantly reduces, but does not totally eliminate, the risk of subsequent development of cancer. However, the benefit of prophylactic mastectomy over alternative strategies (surveillance and chemoprevention) remains to be proven. Currently, prophylactic mastectomy may be considered in a few, carefully selected patients. The decision to perform a prophylactic mastectomy should be a multidisciplinary one. Detailed patient' counselling is very important; the patient should understand the limitations of prophylactic mastectomy and the need for postoperative follow-up. Furthermore, she should be well informed about the alternative strategies.

[Not Available]

Along with the detection of several genetic mutations that are associated with increased susceptibility for hereditary cancer syndromes, e. g. hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer, genetic tests are available for members of families at risk. Until now, the benefit in terms of prevention still needs to be confirmed. Furthermore, a variety of legal, ethical and psychosocial risks has to be considered, unless predictive genetic testing results in additional härm for individuals and families. Guidelines including Standards for genetic analyses and comprehensive counseling have been established worldwide aiming at the prevention of negative consequences for persons at risk. The knowledge collected in Psychooncology is applicable to the field of genetic counseling. During the pre-test-phase counseling aims at supporting the process of decision-making, both in individuals and in families. After disclosure of test results psychosocial support aims to enhance adjustment and communication within families. A small subgroup at risk for increased psychosocial distress warrants additional support. Efforts in research are needed to evaluate psychosocial issues during the process of decision-making and outcome, with adequate length of follow-up. Risk factors indicating poor psychosocial outcome need to be identified in order to develop appropriate ways of support.

Role of the tumor suppressor gene Brca1 in genetic stability and mammary gland tumor formation

Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor BRCA1 predispose women to breast and ovarian cancers. Current evidence demonstrates that mutations in BRCA1 do not directly result in tumor formation, but instead cause genetic instability, subjecting cells to high risks of malignant transformation. In an animal model in which Brca1 is mutated specifically in mammary epithelium, tumorigenesis occurs in mutant glands at low frequency after a long latency. Notably, introduction of a p53-null allele significantly enhanced mammary gland tumor formation in Brca1 conditional mutant mice. These results are consistent with a model that Brca1 is a caretaker gene, whose absence causes genetic instability and triggers further alterations, including inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and/or activation of oncogenes, leading to tumor formation.

Evidence of a founder BRCA1 mutation in Scotland

BRCA1 mutations have been identified in breast and ovarian cancer families from diverse ethnic backgrounds. We studied 17 different families with the BRCA1 2800delAA mutation; seven were ascertained in Scotland (Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow, St Andrews), five in Canada (Toronto, Victoria) and five in the United States (Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle). Overall there was a clear preponderance of Scottish ancestry. Genotype analysis performed on key members from 17 families was consistent with a common haplotype, strongly suggesting a single ancestral origin. A possible link was established between two families by tracing their genealogies through the records of the Registrar General for Scotland. This is the first example of a BRCA1 mutation likely to be derived from a common founder in Scotland. Further studies will be necessary to estimate more accurately the population frequency of the BRCA1 2800delAA mutation among unselected cases of breast and ovarian cancer in Scotland and the UK.

Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: a surgical perspective

BACKGROUND

Molecular alterations in proto-oncogenes, tumour suppressor genes, and genes that function in DNA damage recognition and repair are considered to be hallmarks of a carcinogenic process, including breast carcinogenesis.

METHODS

A computer-assisted search of the English literature (Medline database, 1990-1999) was performed, followed by a manual search of the reference list of pertinent articles retrieved.

RESULTS

Hereditary breast cancer accounts for 5-10 per cent of all breast cancer cases. About 90 per cent of hereditary breast cancers involve mutation of the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. Other cancer-related genes (including myc, c-erbB2, Tsg101 and Mdgi) are involved in breast carcinogenesis, but they do not give rise to familial breast cancer syndromes. Risk estimation is the most important clinical implication. Management options for the high-risk mutation carriers include cancer surveillance and preventive strategies (prophylactic surgery or chemoprevention).

CONCLUSION

Despite inadequate knowledge about the genetic predisposition to breast cancer and its clinical implications, the demand for genetic testing is likely to expand rapidly. In addition to risk estimation, cancer surveillance and preventive strategies, gene therapy offers a new and theoretically attractive approach to breast cancer management.

Evaluation and treatment of BRCA-positive patients

The recent discovery of the breast cancer-associated genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 has now made it possible to identify individuals who are at a very high risk for the future development of breast cancer. To some extent, however, society has fallen victim to its molecular genetic technology. The significance of these discoveries to the detection, treatment, and prevention of breast cancer cannot be overstated. Nevertheless, the appropriate administration and interpretation of BRCA genetic testing and the treatment of BRCA-positive patients remain controversial issues. Complexities of BRCA testing require that such genetic screening be restricted to selected high-risk patients and that test results be interpreted by a knowledgeable molecular geneticist. Although no medical prophylaxis has been demonstrated to be of benefit in BRCA-positive patients, recent evidence suggests that a prophylactic mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, is a reasonable treatment option that substantially reduces cancer risk.

Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological cancers. The most common type of ovarian cancer is epithelial ovarian cancer. Referred to as the 'silent' killer, this disease is difficult to detect because of the lack of specific symptoms. The majority of women who have ovarian cancer are diagnosed in the advanced stages. While the exact cause of ovarian cancer remains elusive, it is believed that the events relating to incessant ovulatory function play a major role in the development of this disease. Long term prognosis of women with ovarian cancer remains grim. Although ovarian cancer is highly responsive to chemotherapy, most women will develop persistent or recurrent disease after primary treatment. The standard front-line treatment is paclitaxel in combination with a platinum-based agent; however, toxicities associated with paclitaxel must be weighed against the clinical benefit. The economic issues associated with the treatment of ovarian cancer involve costs of chemotherapy agents and management of supportive care. Patient preferences and quality-of-life issues are also of major importance because of the short survival benefit for most patients. Therefore, quality of life must be maximised alongside efforts to prolong survival. More research is necessary to determine what trade-offs (e.g. adverse effects of treatment) patients are willing to make for modest gains in survival.

Risk models for familial ovarian and breast cancer

We investigated risk models for the inherited susceptibility of breast and ovarian cancer, using data from both high-risk families and a population based series of ovarian cancer. The first data set consisted of 112 families containing two or more relatives with epithelial ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations were detected in 50% of these families. The second study involved 374 ovarian cancer cases, unselected for family history, who had DNA samples analyzed for BRCA1 mutations. Twelve women were found to be carriers. We constructed genetic models for ovarian and breast cancer using the computer program MENDEL. In the first study, we modeled the effects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 simultaneously and allowed for a third gene predisposing to ovarian cancer. None of the models fitted gave significant evidence for a third gene. Population frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were estimated to be 0. 00128 and 0.00172, respectively. Our results suggest that BRCA1 and BRCA2 may be sufficient to explain the majority of familial ovarian cancer and that families without mutations can be explained by sensitivity of mutation testing and chance clusters of sporadic cases. Using data on the families of the 12 mutation carriers in the second study, we estimated age-specific ovarian and breast cancer risks for BRCA1 mutation carriers. Under the best-fitting model, the cumulative ovarian cancer risk was 66% by age 70, and the corresponding breast cancer risk was 45%. The high penetrance estimate for ovarian cancer, compared with other studies, suggests that modifying genetic or environmental factors may be important determinants of risk.

Involving study populations in the review of genetic research

Genetic research can present risks to all members of a study population, not just those who choose to participate in research. The authors suggest that community-based reviews of research protocols can help identify and minimize such research-related risks.

Founder populations and their uses for breast cancer genetics

Numerous founder mutations have been reported in BRCA1 and BRCA2. For genetic screening of a population with a founder mutation, testing can be targeted to the mutation, allowing for a more rapid and less expensive test. In addition, more precise estimates of the prior probability of carrying a mutation and of the likelihood of a mutation carrier developing cancer should be possible. For a given founder mutation a large number of carriers are available, so that focused scientific studies of penetrance, expression, and genetic and environmental modifiers of risk can be performed. Finally, founder populations may be a powerful resource to localize additional breast cancer susceptibility loci, because of the reduction in locus heterogeneity.

Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection

Our purpose in this study was to identify computer-extracted, mammographic parenchymal patterns that are associated with breast cancer risk. We extracted 14 features from the central breast region on digitized mammograms to characterize the mammographic parenchymal patterns of women at different risk levels. Two different approaches were employed to relate these mammographic features to breast cancer risk. In one approach, the features were used to distinguish mammographic patterns seen in low-risk women from those who inherited a mutated form of the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene, which confers a very high risk of developing breast cancer. In another approach, the features were related to risk as determined from existing clinical models (Gail and Claus models), which use well-known epidemiological factors such as a woman's age, her family history of breast cancer, reproductive history, etc. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis was employed to identify features that were useful in differentiating between "low-risk" women and BRCA1/BRCA2-mutation carriers. Stepwise linear regression analysis was employed to identify useful features in predicting the risk, as estimated from the Gail and Claus models. Similar computer-extracted mammographic features were identified in the two approaches. Results show that women at high risk tend to have dense breasts and their mammographic patterns tend to be coarse and low in contrast.

Breast cancer screening uptake in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer

This multicenter study assessed breast cancer screening uptake in 461 unaffected women at increased risk of developing breast cancer on the basis of family history who approached familial cancer clinics for advice about surveillance options. At the time of attending the clinic, 89% and 90% of participants were vigilant with respect to age- and risk-specific recommendations for mammography and clinical breast examination, respectively, and 51% reported practicing breast self-examination monthly or more frequently. The degree to which health outcomes are perceived to be under one's personal control (chi2 = -2.09, p = 0.0037) and breast cancer anxiety (chi2 = 8.11, p = 0.044) were both associated with monthly or more frequent breast self-examination, while there were no associations with sociodemographic characteristics. A significantly lower percentage (56%) of women aged <30 were vigilant with respect to mammography recommendations, compared to 77%, 96% and 98% of women aged 30-39, 40-49 and >50, respectively (chi2 = 37.2, p < 0.0001). These relatively low rates of mammographic screening in young women may reflect concerns about increased cancer risk associated with early and repeated radiation exposure or lack of sensitivity in young women with radiographically dense breasts. If mammographic screening is ultimately shown to lower mortality in women at high risk, there will be a strong case to promote screening in young women. The need for regular mammographic screening would then need to be highlighted and reinforced amongst young women and their referring physicians. Awareness amongst general practitioners, who are largely responsible for referral to screening services, would also need to be increased.

An unaffected individual from a breast/ovarian cancer family with germline mutations in both BRCA1 and BRCA2

Currently many centers offer testing for three specific mutations, 185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT, in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to Ashkenazi Jewish individuals at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. We recently tested members of a family with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer (Family R014). The proband in this family tested positive for the 185delAG mutation. The unaffected sister of the proband tested positive for both the 185delAG and the 6174delT mutations. Further testing and review of the family history suggest that both mutations may have come from a maternal grandfather and passed down for two generations. Counseling of the unaffected double heterozygote individual in this family is complicated by lack of information on the risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers in such individuals. A better understanding of these risks will depend on the identification and study of more individuals carrying mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our study emphasizes the importance of testing Ashkenazi Jewish individuals from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families for all three common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations identified in this ethnic group.

Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis by capillary and microchip electrophoresis: a fast, simple method for detection of common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2

As a result of intensive studies on hereditary breast and ovarian cancers, two breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been identified. In each gene, a small number of specific mutations have been found at relatively high frequency in certain ethnic populations. The mutations, 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2, have been identified as common mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, with a combined frequency of 2.0 to 2.5%. Women who have one of the above three common mutations are at a high risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Consequently, accurate and cost-effective detection of these three mutations may have important implications for risk assessment in susceptible women and men. In this report, we describe a fast and simple capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based method using a polymer network for screening the three common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Fluorescent dye-labeled primers (6-FAM-tagged) were used to amplify three DNA fragments of 258, 296, and 201 bp for detection of the 185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT mutations, respectively. After the PCR products were denatured, a single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) profile could be obtained for each mutation in less than 10 min by CE in a polymer network. We demonstrate the potential provided by translating this assay to the microchip format where the SSCP analysis is complete in 120 s, representing only a fraction of the reduction in analysis time that can be achieved with microchip technology. The speed and simplicity of the SSCP methodology for detection of these mutations make it attractive for use in the clinical diagnostic laboratory.

The ethical analysis of risk

The institutional review board (IRB) is the social-oversight mechanism charged with protecting research subjects. Performing this task competently requires that the IRB scrutinize informed-consent procedures, the balance of risks and potential benefits, and subject-selection procedures in research protocols. Unfortunately, it may be said that IRBs are spending too much time editing informed-consent forms and too little time analyzing the risks and potential benefits posed by research. This time mismanagement is clearly reflected in the research ethics literature. A review of articles published between 1979 and 1990 in IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, for example, reveals a large number of articles on informed consent and confidentiality (142 articles) and considerably fewer on the assessment of risks and potential harms (40), study design (20), and subject-selection procedures (5).

Increased cell survival by inhibition of BRCA1 using an antisense approach in an estrogen responsive ovarian carcinoma cell line

STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: We tested the hypothesis that BRCA1 may play a role in the regulation of ovarian tumor cell death as well as the inhibition of ovarian cell proliferation. Introduction of BRCA1 antisense retroviral constructs into BG-1 estrogen-dependent ovarian adenocarcinoma cells resulted in reduced BRCA1 expression. BRCA1 antisense pooled populations and derived subclones were able to proliferate in monolayer culture without estrogen, whereas control cells began to die after 10 days of estrogen deprivation. In addition, both populations and subclones of BRCA1 antisense infected cells demonstrated a growth advantage in monolayer culture in the presence of estrogen and were able to proliferate in monolayer culture without estrogen, while control cells did not. Furthermore, clonal studies demonstrated that reduced levels of BRCA1 protein correlated with growth in soft agar and greater tumor formation in nude mice in the absence of estrogen. These data suggest that reduction of BRCA1 protein in BG-1 ovarian adenocarcinoma cells may have an effect on cell survival during estrogen deprivation both in vitro and in vivo.

Molecular biology in radiation oncology. Radiation oncology perspective of BRCA1 and BRCA2

The breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are used to illustrate the application of molecular biology to clinical radiation oncology. Identified by linkage analysis and cloned, the structure of the genes and the numerous mutations are determined by molecular biology techniques that examine the structure of the DNA and the proteins made by the normal and mutant alleles. Mutations in the non-transcribed portion of the gene will not be found in protein structure assays and may be important in gene function. In addition to potential deleterious mutations, normal polymorphisms of the gene will also be detected, therefore not all differences in gene sequence may represent important mutations, a finding that complicates genetic screening and counseling. The localization of the protein in the nucleus, the expression in relation to cell cycle and the association with RAD51 led to the discovery that the two BRCA genes may be involved in transcriptional regulation and DNA repair. The defect in DNA repair can increase radiosensitivity which might improve local control using breast-conserving treatment in a tumor which is homozygous for the loss of the gene (i.e., BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes). This is supported by the early reports of a high rate of local control with breast-conserving therapy. Nonetheless, this radiosensitivity theoretically may also lead to increased susceptibility to carcinogenic effects in surviving cells, a finding that might not be observed for decades. The susceptibility to radiation-induced DNA damage appears also to make the cells more sensitive to chemotherapy. Understanding the role of the normal BRCA genes in DNA repair might help define a novel mechanism for radiation sensitization by interfering with the normal gene function using a variety of molecular or biochemical therapies.

Breast conservation therapy for invasive breast cancer in Ashkenazi women with BRCA gene founder mutations

BACKGROUND

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Whether women with breast cancer who have inherited mutations in these genes have a different outcome after breast conservation therapy than women with "sporadic" cancer is unresolved. Consequently, we compared the outcomes after breast conservation therapy in Ashkenazi women with or without germline mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (hereafter called BRCA).

METHODS

We studied 305 women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent undergoing breast-conserving treatment for 329 invasive breast cancers. We reviewed their clinical records, retrieved their archival tissue samples, and tested those samples for the founder mutations BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 5382insC, and BRCA2 6174delT. Genetic results were linked to clinical data and outcomes by univariate and multivariate analyses. All Pvalues are two-sided.

RESULTS

We detected mutations in BRCA genes in 28 of 305 women. Women with BRCA mutations were more likely to be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 50 years (P<.001) and to have lymph node involvement (P =.04). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was more common in women with BRCA mutations, although this did not reach statistical significance (relative risk [RR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-5.03). Women with mutations were more likely to develop contralateral breast cancer (RR = 3.50; 95% CI = 1.78-8.74; P =.001). Distant disease-free survival was shorter in women with mutations (66.2% versus 84.3% at 10 years; P =.05), as was breast cancer-specific survival (71.9% versus 87.2% at 10 years; P =.02). Tumor stage and nodal status, but not mutation status, were predictive of distant disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with BRCA founder mutations are at increased risk for breast cancer-related events after breast conservation. However, mutation status is not an independent predictor of survival and should not influence decisions regarding adjuvant therapy. The increased contralateral breast cancer risk in women heterozygous for BRCA mutations mandates careful surveillance.

Inherited genetic predisposition in breast cancer. A population-based perspective

Two classes of inherited susceptibility genes may be considered in the etiology of breast and other common cancers. First, genes have been identified that confer a high degree of breast cancer (BC) risk, usually associated with hereditary syndromes, but disease-associated germline variants in these genes are relatively rare in the general population. These include BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53. The proportion of BC in the general population that can be explained by these genes is relatively small. Second, variant genotypes at other loci may confer a relatively smaller degree of cancer risk, but they are carried by a larger proportion of the general population. As a result, the proportion of BC that could be explained by these genes may be relatively large. To understand the genetic basis for BCs in the general population, both of these classes of genes may need to be considered. This paper presents an overview of genes thought to be involved in BC susceptibility. Genes that confer a high degree of risk are more likely to result in hereditary patterns of cancer that are amenable to identification by genetic epidemiologic methods using pedigree data. More common (e.g., nonhereditary) forms of BC may be optimally analyzed by molecular epidemiologic studies using case-case, case-control, or cohort designs. The use of an appropriate study design is crucial to the identification of genes with relatively small effects on BC risk. To understand the inherited factors that explain BC in the general population, consideration should be given to genes with different allele frequencies and magnitudes of effect, using appropriate analytical approaches. By understanding the complex interactions of these genes with one another and with exposures, improved risk assessment and potential for targeted cancer prevention strategies may be possible.

Prophylactic mastectomy and inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma

Relative to her risk of breast carcinoma, the woman with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation can be managed either by intensive screening (with or without chemoprevention) or by prophylactic mastectomy. Although it would be preferable to avoid prophylactic surgery, the current level of screening technology and the rudimentary state of chemoprevention do not guarantee a good outcome with intensive surveillance. A review of the currently available data was undertaken to determine the efficacy of prophylactic surgery, intensive screening, and chemoprevention. An attempt then was made to extrapolate the efficacy of the various approaches to the management of women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations. Intensive surveillance may not detect breast carcinoma at an early, curable stage in young women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations because the growth rate of the tumors in these women most likely will be rapid and the density of the breast tissue may compromise detection. Chemoprevention is in its infancy, and its efficacy in this population is unknown. Conversely, prophylactic surgery may not be completely effective in preventing breast carcinoma. The authors are hopeful that sometime in the next decade advances in chemoprevention, screening technology, or breast carcinoma treatment will make mastectomy obsolete. However, for the time being prophylactic mastectomy has attributes that make it an alternative for this population that must be considered. Careful discussion of all options is essential in the management of these women.

Managing hereditary ovarian cancer risk

Ovarian cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in American women. About 10% of cases are thought to have a hereditary basis, and family history is the strongest known risk factor. In the past, prophylactic oophorectomy has been advocated for women with two or more affected first-degree relatives. More recently, with the identification of the genes responsible for most hereditary ovarian cancers (BRCA1, BRCA2), oophorectomy can now be offered specifically to women who are mutation carriers. Conversely, noncarriers in these families can be reassured that their risk of ovarian cancer is not increased. The value of oophorectomy in mutation carriers has not yet been proven, however, and concern exists that the benefit may be less than intuitively expected. First, although the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer initially was reported to be as high as 60%, more recent studies have suggested risks in the range of 15 to 30%. A better understanding of the factors that underlie variable penetrance in mutation carriers is needed to augment our ability to counsel individual women. In addition, peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma indistinguishable from ovarian cancer occurs in some women after oophorectomy. Studies that better define the frequency with which this occurs are needed to establish the magnitude of the protective effect conferred by prophylactic oophorectomy. In view of the uncertainty regarding the efficacy of prophylactic oophorectomy, chemopreventive and early detection approaches also deserve consideration as strategies for decreasing ovarian cancer mortality in women who carry mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.

Reproductive factors in hereditary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

An early age at menarche, a short menstrual cycle length, and a high age at first full term pregnancy or nulliparity are known risk factors for breast cancer. These risk factors have previously been reported to differ between breast cancer patients with and without a family history of breast cancer and also between breast cancer patients and controls.

METHODS

Self-administered questionnaires were filled out by 95 women belonging to 24 families with known BRCA1 mutations, 16 women belonging to nine families with known BRCA2 mutations, and 95 women belonging to 65 families with hereditary breast cancer where no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations could be detected. Thirty-nine women were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 56 women were BRCA1 negative, 11 women were BRCA2 carriers and five BRCA2 negative. All women were born between 1905 and 1979.

RESULTS

Age at menarche, physiological menstrual cycle length at age 30 or at current age in younger women (when not using oral contraceptives), age at first full term pregnancy, and nulliparity did not significantly differ between BRCA1 mutation carriers and BRCA1 negative women. Too few women were BRCA2 negative to serve as a control group. BRCA2 mutation carriers were therefore compared with BRCA1 negative and BRCA2 negative women. None of the above reproductive factors did significantly differ between BRCA2 mutation carriers and from BRCA1 and BRCA2 families. Women from non-BRCA1/BRCA2 hereditary breast cancer families had a higher age at menarche, but this was no longer significant after adjustment for other factors in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that reproductive risk factors of breast cancer are not related to BRCA1 or BRCA2 carrier status. There was also no indication that these factors differ in carriers of unknown susceptibility genes compared with non-carriers from BRCA1 and BRCA2 families.

Screening for hereditary cancer and genetic testing, epitomized by breast cancer

The new genetics is having an impact on many areas of healthcare. Diversity in the genetic code accounts for differences in phenotypes between populations and it is becoming apparent that genetic differences may have a role in predisposition to and behaviour of disease. Genetic models suggest that there are two types of genetic predisposition to disease: the so-called high and low penetrance genes. At present, most of the impact on medicine has been from highly penetrant genes, and genetic testing for disease predisposition, particularly for diseases of late onset (e.g. certain cancers) is in its infancy. As a general statement, approximately 5-10% of common cancers are due to such highly penetrant genes. The category of genes that will become of increasing interest is that of the low penetrance genes. Often these are normal variations in genes that result in a slightly increased risk of disease. These are analogous to high blood pressure carrying an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Once rapid genetic analysis is available for these types of genes, such analysis would be analogous to taking someone's blood pressure in a general practitioner's (GP's) surgery to identify individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This will produce a revolutionary change in the way we practise medicine. Genetic analysis will become faster and may therefore be more commonplace. It is possible to envisage an era when genetic analysis will become a routine part of primary care to identify changes in low penetrance genes that will confer a 'risk profile' for patients. This will then enable their primary care physicians to advise about primary prevention and even prescribe certain preventive drugs to decrease the risk of certain diseases occurring. This proactive rather than reactive style of practising medicine is potentially exciting, however it carries with it ethical, legal and social implications for how we deal with this new knowledge.

Clinical impact of molecular genetic diagnosis, genetic counseling, and management of hereditary cancer. Part I: Studies of cancer in families

Hereditary cancer represents approximately 5-10% of the total cancer burden and may account for 60,000 to 120,000 new cancer occurrences this year in the United States. New developments in molecular genetics and the cloning of cancer-prone genes have intensely fueled interest in dealing with hereditary forms of cancer. The authors provide an algorithm that depicts the process for the identification, study, and DNA-based genetic counseling of families being investigated under a research proposal at the Hereditary Cancer Institute of Creighton University School of Medicine. They have studied 56 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma families; in 18 of them, associated genomic mutations have been identified in affected members. DNA-based genetic counseling has been provided for seven of these families. The authors have also evaluated 131 hereditary breast-ovarian carcinoma families. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searches have been performed for 76 of these families; BRCA1 mutations were found in 38 families and BRCA2 mutations in 9. The study of cancer-prone families is a powerful approach to cancer control, particularly when the germ-line mutation is identified in the family and individuals at high risk can be tested, once they provide informed consent, and receive DNA-based genetic counseling. Discovery of the germ-line mutation for cancer proneness provides an unparalleled opportunity to predict patients' life-time risk for cancer of specific anatomic sites, inclusive of a pattern of multiple primaries. Surveillance and management protocols, when melded to the particular syndrome's natural history, can be life-saving.