Cause of death in men diagnosed with prostate carcinoma

Association of African-American ethnic background with survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

African-American men have earlier onset of prostate cancer, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, more advanced stage at diagnosis, and higher mortality than white men. It is not known whether the poorer survival of African-American men with prostate cancer reflects their later stage at diagnosis or differences in the basic biology of their disease. To evaluate this question, we examined outcomes of African-American and white men with metastatic prostate cancer in the context of a randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Southwest Oncology Group Study 8894 was a randomized phase III trial that compared orchiectomy with or without flutamide in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Using data from 288 African-American and 975 white men in the trial, we conducted a proportional hazards regression analysis to determine if ethnicity was an independent predictor of survival. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

African-American men were more likely than white men to have extensive disease and bone pain and had poorer performance status, younger age at study entry, higher Gleason score, and higher PSA levels. After adjustment for these prognostic variables, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality for African-American men relative to white men was 1.23 (P: =.018). Further adjustment for initial quality-of-life assessments also resulted in higher HRs associated with African-American ethnicity relative to white ethnicity (HR = 1.39; P: =.007).

CONCLUSIONS

African-American men with metastatic prostate cancer have a statistically significantly worse prognosis than white men that cannot be explained by the prognostic variables explored in this study. These data should give increased impetus for efforts to detect the disease early in African-American men and for the development of more effective therapies based on potential biologic differences in this ethnic group.

Cigarette smoking and risk of prostate cancer in the physicians' health study (United States)

To assess whether cigarette smoking is associated with prostate cancer incidence or mortality, we analyzed a large cohort of 22,071 men, aged 40-84 at baseline, in the Physicians' Health Study. During an average of 12.5 years of follow-up, we documented 996 cases of prostate cancer, including 113 fatal cases. Men were categorized according to smoking status, total pack-years smoked, and duration of smoking. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the relative risks associated with smoking. Compared to never smokers, the age-adjusted relative risks (RR) of total prostate cancer were 1. 14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.30) for past smokers, 1.10 (95% CI = 0.78-1.55) for current smokers of less than 20 cigarettes per day, and 1.10 (95% CI = 0.84-1.44) for current smokers of 20 or more cigarettes per day. Adjustment for body mass index, height, alcohol intake, and physical activity did not materially alter these findings. No significant association was observed in analyses of total pack-years smoked or duration of smoking. The results were similar for non-fatal and fatal prostate cancer. These data indicate no material association between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer incidence or mortality.

Geographic variation in patient surveillance after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is often diagnosed early enough in its clinical course to permit radical prostatectomy to be done with curative intent, yet many patients experience tumor recurrence. Most patients receive postoperative surveillance, but the intensity of testing varies appreciably. We sought to evaluate the influence of geographic location on the variability of surveillance intensity.

METHODS

Questionnaires pertaining to postoperative surveillance were mailed to 4467 members of the American Urological Association (AUA). Practice pattern variation was assessed among 24 large metropolitan statistical areas, among nine United States census regions, and by health maintenance organization penetration rate.

RESULTS

Of 4467 urologists surveyed, 1416 (32%) responded and 1050 (24%) responses were evaluable. Correlation analysis showed that mean follow-up intensity across modalities surveyed was highly correlated across tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stages and years postsurgery. We found no significant main effects attributable to metropolitan statistical area, United States (US) census region, or health maintenance organization (HMO) penetration rate for commonly used surveillance modalities: serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), office visit, and urinalysis. For infrequently used modalities, there were minimal effects on testing intensity of US census region, metropolitan statistical area, and HMO penetration rate. Few two-way and three-way interactions were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of commonly used surveillance modalities by urologists caring for patients after radical prostatectomy is not affected by metropolitan statistical area, US census region, or HMO penetration rate.

Causes of death in elderly prostate cancer patients and in a comparison nonprostate cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer tends to affect older men and to progress relatively slowly. Since the prevalence of comorbidity increases with advancing age, competing causes of death are important contributors to death rates among prostate cancer patients. Accurate determination of the underlying causes of death in older men dying with prostate cancer may thus also be more difficult.

METHODS

We compared the distribution of underlying causes of death in decedents from a population-based cohort of elderly prostate cancer patients to that from a population-based comparison cohort of elderly men without prostate cancer. Among decedents from the prostate cancer patient cohort, we examined associations of patient demographics, disease stage, and initial treatment, with assignment of a prostate cancer underlying cause of death (versus any other cause) by use of multivariable logistic regression. In the subgroup of prostate cancer patient decedents having underlying causes of death other than prostate cancer, the underlying cause distribution was compared with that in nonprostate cancer cohort decedents.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was the underlying cause for 39% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 36.3-41.9) of the decedents in the prostate cancer cohort. Causes of death among prostate cancer patients not dying of prostate cancer were similar to those among the nonprostate cancer cohort decedents. However, in those who were aggressively treated, the adjusted odds of other cancer causes of death were 51% higher (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.08-2.10) than that in nonprostate cancer patient decedents, while in those treated with watchful waiting the adjusted odds were 34% lower (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.47-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial treatment may influence the underlying cause of death reported in vital statistics for prostate cancer patients.

Frequency of coexistent disease at CT in patients with prostate carcinoma selected for definitive radiation therapy: is limited treatment-planning CT adequate?

PURPOSE

To document the frequency of clinically important coexistent disease depicted at contrast material-enhanced abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma, as such lesions might be missed at limited nonenhanced treatment-planning CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 133 consecutive patients with prostate carcinoma who were referred to the radiation oncology division between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1996, 77 underwent definitive radiation therapy that required either contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic CT (n = 67) or contrast-enhanced pelvic CT (n = 10). Results of these studies were reviewed and retrospectively categorized.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (62%) of the 77 patients had either negative studies or minor abnormalities that did not require further follow-up. Only two patients (3%) had major abnormalities that required intervention. Five patients (6%) had new findings of clinically important coexistent disease, but no intervention was required.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of clinically important coexistent disease in patients with prostate carcinoma who are referred for definitive radiation therapy is low. Therefore, contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic CT in addition to treatment-planning CT is of limited value.