Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty

Posterior vaginal wall defects and their relation to measures of pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms in patients with posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

STUDY DESIGN

Two hundred twenty-seven women who were referred to a urogynecology and urology clinic were enrolled prospectively. Each patient completed a health history questionnaire and standardized physical examination that specifically graded uterovaginal prolapse according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine women had a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system point (most dependent portion of the posterior vaginal wall during straining as measured from the hymeneal ring) of < or =-1. Older age, a history of hysterectomy, a genital hiatus of >3 cm (48% vs 24%; P =.002), and perineal descent of > or =2 cm (14% vs 5%; P =.042) were significantly more common in women with posterior vaginal prolapse. When women with posterior prolapse and symptomatic complaints were compared with asymptomatic women with prolapse, a perineal descent of > or =2 cm (21% vs 0%; P =.004) was significantly more common in the symptomatic group.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor neuromuscular function should be related to posterior vaginal prolapse and symptoms; however, only perineal descent appears associated strongly with both symptoms and prolapse in this population.

Fecal incontinence

The treatment of fecal incontinence is particularly gratifying because the loss of fecal control has a devastating effect on a patients lifestyle. One must consider the myriad factors that influence bowel control to properly diagnose and treat each patient. Physiology testing, particularly the use of ultrasound, is essential when treatment extends beyond dietary and medical management. Recent reports suggest that the success of typical treatments may diminish with time. This may indicate a greater need in the future for innovative options such as the artificial bowel sphincter or sacral stimulation.

Anterior anal sphincter repair: results in a district general hospital

OBJECTIVE

Previous series have evaluated the overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair, but with short-term follow-up and a wide range of results. We assessed our results of the anterior sphincter repair in patients with faecal incontinence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent an anterior anal sphincter repair between October 1994 and July 1999. In 12 of the patients, a polypropylene mesh was inserted in the repair to act as re-inforcement. Pre-operatively, all patients had an anterior anal sphincter defect diagnosed with endo-anal ultrasound. Clinical evaluation included the patient's assessment of improvement and the Cleveland Clinic Continence Score before and after surgery. Manometric studies were performed pre-operatively and a median time of 11.5 mouths postoperatively.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 3-61 months), 16 out of 20 (80%) patients said that surgery had improved their symptoms. There was a significant improvement in the continence score from 14 (range, 4-15) before operation to 7 (range, 0-15) after operation (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in mean anal sphincter length, mean resting and maximum squeeze anal canal pressures before and after surgery. Similar results were obtained in patients with and without mesh re-inforcement.

CONCLUSIONS

In our institution, the overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair is successful in relieving symptoms in patients with faecal incontinence due to an anterior sphincter defect. This improvement, however, is not associated with any significant changes in anorectal manometric parameters.

Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery

PURPOSE

Fecal leakage after open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure is common, but underreported. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the physiologic and morphologic effects of sphincterotomy, comparing continent and incontinent patients after surgery. This group was further compared with an unselected group of patients presenting with incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and June 1999, 23 patients were prospectively followed up through internal sphincterotomy with conventional and vector volume anorectal manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Fourteen continent patients were compared with 9 incontinent postoperative cases, 9 patients referred with incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy, and 33 healthy volunteers without anorectal disease.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted between continent and incontinent postsphincterotomy cases for all resting conventional and vector volume parameters and for some squeeze parameters. Although there was a significant reduction in postoperative high pressure zone length at rest, there were no differences between the postoperative groups. There was an increase in sphincter asymmetry of 6.7 percent (+/- 3.5 percent) in incontinent postsphincterotomy patients and a decrease of 2.8 percent (+/- 3.2 percent) in continent cases. Significant differences were noted for resting parameters between incontinent postsphincterotomy and posthemorrhoidectomy patients, with a higher resting sphincter asymmetry in the latter group. The area under the rectoanal inhibitory curve was smaller in postsphincterotomy incontinent patients when compared with continent cohorts over the distal and intermediate sphincter zones at rest with a reduced latency of inhibition. There was no difference in the magnetic resonance images of the sphincterotomy site between incontinent and continent postsphincterotomy cases and no posthemorrhoidectomy case had evidence of sphincteric damage.

CONCLUSION

There are complex significant differences in the postoperative physiology of patients undergoing lateral internal sphincterotomy who become incontinent when compared with those who maintain continence. These physiologic changes are not reflected in detectable morphologic sphincteric differences. It is unknown whether these changes predict for long-term incontinence, and it is suggested that postoperative incontinence after minor anorectal surgery is not necessarily related either to a preexisting sphincter defect or inadvertent intraoperative sphincter injury.

Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair

PURPOSE

Delayed repair of obstetric-related anal sphincter injury remains problematic, and perineal wound breakdown is common. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome after overlap anal sphincter repair and to determine the advantages, if any, of a posterior fourchette incision (n = 18) compared with a conventional perineal incision (n = 32).

METHODS

Fifty females of mean parity 2.8 (standard deviation, 1.6) underwent repair in a five-year period. The mean follow-up was 23 months. Assessment was by anal vector manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and continence scoring.

RESULTS

Functional outcomes were similar in the two groups. Repair increased squeeze-pressure increment and improved continence scores in both groups. Postoperative wound complications were fewer when a posterior fourchette incision was used compared with a perineal incision (11 vs. 44 percent, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed anal sphincter repair improves continence. A posterior fourchette approach is associated with fewer postoperative wound complications without compromising the quality of repair and the functional outcome.

Outcome of sphincteroplasty combined with surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse

PURPOSE

This is the first reported prospective study comparing outcome and cost in patients undergoing sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence vs. sphincteroplasty performed in combination with one or more procedures for urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

We analyzed 44 patients with fecal incontinence who underwent anal sphincter repair alone (20 patients) or in combination with procedures for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse (24 patients). Information regarding risk factors for fecal incontinence, the degree of incontinence, and the extent that incontinence limited social, physical, and sexual activity was prospectively obtained from questionnaires. Clinic chart reviews and follow-up telephone interviews provided additional data. A cohort of case-matched patients who underwent only urogynecologic procedures was compared retrospectively for operative time, hospital cost, length of stay, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were no major complications in any group. The functional outcomes, physical, social, and sexual activity were similar in all three groups. Twenty-two of 24 patients who underwent the combined procedures were glad that they had both procedures concomitantly.

CONCLUSION

Combination pelvic floor surgery provides good outcomes and is cost effective. This approach should be offered to women with concurrent problems of fecal and urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse.

Clinical rather than laboratory assessment predicts continence after anterior sphincteroplasty

PURPOSE

Preoperative anorectal physiology studies have become part of the standard evaluation of fecal incontinence. This study was undertaken to see whether anorectal physiology results predicted surgical outcome after anterior sphincteroplasty.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 1994, 191 females with a mean age of 37 (range, 20-74) years underwent anterior sphincteroplasty for anal sphincter disruption. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients, and there were 158 respondents (83 percent). Mean follow-up was 43 (range, 6-120) months. Obstetric injuries accounted for incontinence in 91 percent of the 158 patients who responded to the questionnaire. Mean duration of incontinence was 4.2 years (range, 3 months-51 years) before surgery. Preoperatively, patients were incontinent to solid stool (53 percent), liquid stool (33 percent), gas (3 percent), and unspecified (11 percent).

RESULTS

Subjectively, the results were as follows: 129 patients (82 percent) improved, 17 (11 percent) were initially improved but subsequently deteriorated, 7 (4 percent) were unchanged, and 5 (3 percent) were worse. Objectively, postoperative continence was classified as follows: excellent (normal) in 23 percent, good (incontinent to gas or minor stain) in 39 percent, fair (incontinent to stool an average of less than once per month) in 26 percent, and poor (incontinent to stool an average of greater than once per month) in 12 percent. Preoperative continence level (incontinent to solid vs. liquid stool) was predictive of postoperative continence classification. Preoperative anorectal manometry was not predictive of clinical outcome (n = 128). There was no significant difference in postoperative continence classification among patients with normal, unilaterally abnormal, and bilaterally abnormal pudendal latency (n = 89).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical rather than manometric assessment predicts continence after anterior sphincteroplasty.

Peri-operative management of patients having external anal sphincter repairs: temporary prevention of defaecation does not improve outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there was any detectable difference in outcomes of external anal sphincter repair depending on whether patients were managed routinely with a covering stoma, a constipating dietary regimen or a laxative dietary regimen in the early postoperative period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A consecutive retrospective series of 299 anal sphincter repairs undertaken on 286 patients within a single institution was studied. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the peri-operative regimen followed: routine use of a covering stoma (group 1), routine use of a postoperative constipating dietary regimen (group 2) and routine use of a laxative dietary regimen (group 3). Choice of peri-operative regimen depended on surgeon preference alone. Short-term outcomes (length of stay, complications) and long-term outcomes (functional reported degree of continence, anal ultrasound and physiology test results) were assessed in relation to peri-operative group as well as aetiology of sphincter damage.

RESULTS

Short-term results (complications of surgery) were obtainable in all patients; long-term results were available for 89% of patients. Length of stay was similar for all 3 groups (excluding re-admission for stoma closure). Complication rates were not significantly different between the three groups. Functional improvement in continence was reported by 68% of group 1, 69% of group 2 and 79% of group 3 (differences not statistically significant). An anatomical sphincter defect was detected postoperatively in 8% of patients in group 1, 9% in group 2 and 7% of group 3. Poorer outcomes were achieved in older patients and in patients with previous ileo-anal pouch formation. Early faecal impaction and repair breakdown were independently associated with poor long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither routine use of a covering stoma nor a postoperative constipating regimen produced better results following external anal sphincter repair than did the use of a postoperative laxative regimen which encouraged early passage of loose stool without the need for straining.

The effects of labour and delivery on the pelvic floor

Increasing public and professional attention has recently been focused on the issue of both faecal and urinary incontinence following childbirth and these symptoms are sometimes being cited as indications for elective caesarean section. Faecal incontinence has a female-to-male preponderance of 8:1, consistent with childbirth as the principal causative factor, although most symptomatic women do not seek medical advice until after the menopause. Similarly, urinary stress incontinence is almost an exclusively female phenomenon. Obstetric injury may take the form of direct muscular damage to the anal sphincter, as occurs during a third-degree tear, and/or may be the result of cumulative damage to the pudendal nerves. Mechanical, neural and endocrine factors may all play a causative role in faecal incontinence. Symptoms are rarely volunteered by the patient, and may be present for many years after the index pregnancy, and clinical examination alone may fail to detect specific abnormalities. The performance of anal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, urodynamics and neurophysiology studies of the pelvic floor may help to increase the diagnostic yield. Treatment for both urinary and faecal incontinence is available in the form of physiotherapy, fluid and dietary manipulation and in more severe cases, surgery. Adequate primary management of third-degree tears requires careful appraisal as this injury, in particular, is the most important risk factor for subsequent faecal incontinence symptoms. In this chapter we aim to outline the mechanism of damage to the pelvic floor during childbirth, concentrating primarily on anal sphincter damage. We describe the necessary investigations, follow-up and treatment which women with significant pelvic floor damage should receive following delivery, and we finally discuss the issue of further deliveries and, specifically, the current place of caesarean section.

Manometric squeeze pressure difference parallels functional outcome after overlapping sphincter reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of overlapping anal sphincter reconstruction and to determine the manometric parameters that correlate with a successful functional outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who had undergone overlapping sphincter reconstruction for anal incontinence from 1988 to 1999 was undertaken. Only patients with preoperative and six-months-postoperative anal manometry were included in this study. Standard statistical tests were used to compare pre- and postoperative findings.

RESULTS

A total of 52 overlapping sphincter reconstructions were performed on 49 patients (46 females). The mean age was 44 (+/- standard error, 15.8; range, 20-81) years, with follow-up at six months. Forty-two patients had a history of complicated vaginal delivery (episiotomies, tears, forceps delivery); 36 patients had a history of anal or perineal surgery; and two patients had perianal Crohn's disease. Nine patients (17 percent) had undergone prior sphincter repair. Incontinence grade improved in 37 patients (71 percent), and complete continence returned in 21 patients (40 percent). The presence of a rectovaginal fistula, postoperative complications, previous sphincter repair, and increase in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency did not affect functional outcome (P = not significant). Patients older than 50 years had a better functional outcome than their younger counterparts after sphincter repair (P = 0.02). Although mean maximal squeeze pressure and mean anal sphincter length increased significantly after sphincter reconstruction (P = 0.0006 and 0.004, respectively), only squeeze pressure difference correlated with functional outcome (r = 0.37; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Overlapping sphincter reconstruction improved anal function in the majority of patients. The most important factor in the return to normal sphincter function is an increase in squeeze pressure.

Clinical neurophysiology and electrodiagnostic testing of the pelvic floor

This article summarizes our current understanding of the neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of the pelvic floor. The electrodiagnostic evaluation of the pelvic floor muscles and external anal sphincter, including pudendal nerve conduction studies, sacral reflexes, and needs EMG is presented. The discussion reviews the test methodology, the strengths and limitations of each test, and their clinical utility. The authors have tried to critically review the objective evidence to support the use of electrodiagnostic tests in the evaluation and management of pelvic floor disorders. The reader will have a better understanding of the rationale, methodology, clinical utility, and potential pitfalls for each of the commonly used neurophysiological tests of the pelvic floor.

Surgical treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a disabling and distressing condition. Many patients are reluctant to discuss the condition with a physician. A thorough history, good physical examination, and detailed anorectal physiologic investigations can help in the therapeutic decision-making algorithm. Patients with isolated anterior sphincter defects are candidates for overlapping repair. In the presence of unilateral or bilateral pudendal neuropathy, the patient should be counseled preoperatively regarding a [table: see text] lower anticipation of success. If the injury occurred shortly before the planned surgery and neuropathy is present, it may be prudent to wait because neuropathy sometimes can resolve within 6 to 24 months of the injury. Pudendal nerve study may help determine surgical timing. An anterior sphincter defect combined with a rectovaginal fistula can be approached by overlapping sphincter repair and a concomitant transanal advancement flap. Patients who had undergone multiple such procedures may benefit from concomitant fecal diversion at the time of repeat sphincter repair. Patients with global or multifocal sphincter injury may be candidates for a neosphincter procedure. The stimulated graciloplasty and artificial bowel sphincter are reasonable options. In the absence of the availability of these techniques or because of financial constraints, consideration could be given to bilateral gluteoplasty or unilateral or bilateral nonstimulated graciloplasty. The postanal repair still serves a role in patients with isolated decreased resting pressures with or without neuropathy or external sphincter injury with minimal degrees of incontinence. Biofeedback and the Procon device may play a role in these patients. Lastly, fecal diversion must be considered as a means of improving the quality of life because the patient can participate in the activities of daily living without the fear of fecal incontinence.

Treatment options for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

Fecal incontinence is a socially devastating disorder which affects at least 2.2 percent of community dwelling adults and 45 percent of nursing home residents. Most incontinent patients can be helped, but physicians are poorly informed about treatment options. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus on treatment options by convening a conference of surgeons, gastroenterologists, nurses, psychologists, and patient advocates.

METHOD

A 1-1/2 day conference was held in April, 1999. Experts from different disciplines gave overviews, followed by extended discussions. Consensus statements were developed at the end of the conference. This summary statement was drafted, circulated to all participants, and revised based on their input.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Diarrhea is the most common aggravating factor for fecal incontinence, and antidiarrheal medications such as loperamide and diphenoxylate or bile acid binders may help. Fecal impaction, a common cause of fecal incontinence in children and elderly patients, responds to combinations of laxatives, education, and habit training in approximately 60 percent. These causes of fecal incontinence can usually be identified by history and physical examination alone. 2) In patients who fail medical management or have evidence of sphincter weakness, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound are recommended as helpful in differentiating simple morphologic defects from afferent and efferent nerve injuries and from combined structural and neurologic injuries. 3) Biofeedback is a harmless and inexpensive treatment which benefits approximately 75 percent of patients but cures only about 50 percent. It may be most appropriate when there is neurologic injury (i.e., partial denervation), but it has been reported to also benefit incontinent patients with minor structural defects. 4) External anal sphincter plication with or without pelvic floor repair is indicated when there is a known, repairable structural defect without significant neurologic injury. It is effective in approximately 68 percent. 5) Salvage operations are reserved for patients who can not benefit from biofeedback or levator-sphincteroplasty. These include electrically stimulated gracilis muscle transpositions and colostomy. 6) Antegrade enemas delivered through stomas in the cecum or descending colon reduce or eliminate soiling in approximately 78 percent of children with myelomeningocele; this operation may come to be more widely applied. 7) Investigational treatments include implanted nerve stimulators, artificial sphincters, and anal plugs. 8) Patient characteristics which influence choice of treatment include mental status, mobility impairment, and typical bowel habits. 9) Additional research is needed to better define the mechanisms responsible for fecal incontinence, to assess the efficacy of these treatments, to develop better treatments for nursing home residents, and to identify predictors of outcome.

Audit of anal-sphincter repair

OBJECTIVE

Structural damage of the anterior part of the anal sphincter is a major cause of faecal incontinence. Sphincter repair is the standard surgical treatment. This study was designed to analyse the results of anal sphincter repair, to identify possible predictors of outcome and to investigate the presence of bowel symptoms other than leakage at follow up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five women (median age 39 years, range 24-73 years) who underwent anal sphincter repair between 1986 and 1997 at the University Hospital of Linköping answered a postal questionnaire. Current bowel function, degree of continence and the patients' functional result as worse, unchanged, some improvement, good or excellent were assessed. Good or excellent function was regarded as a successful result, the rest as failure. Age, duration of symptoms, type of surgery, morbidity and length of follow up were analysed in relation to outcome. Results of pre- and post-operative anal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, anal sphincter electromyography and pudendal nerve function were also analysed.

RESULTS

After a median (range) follow-up period of 40 months (5-137) months, 31 (56%) patients rated the result as either excellent (n=10) or good (n=21). Twenty-one (38%) patients rated the result as some improvement (n=14), unchanged (n=6) or worse (n=1). In three (5%) patients a colostomy was fashioned because of failure. Patients >50 years at surgery (n=18) had a worse outcome (P=0.001). Successful outcome was correlated to increased squeeze pressures post-operatively. The presence of post-operative urgency (P=0.01) and loose stools (P=0.02) was more common in patients with poor outcome. Eight patients became continent to formed and liquid stool.

Postanal repair for fecal incontinence--is it worthwhile?

PURPOSE

Patients with idiopathic or neurogenic incontinence without an isolated sphincter defect may be suitable candidates for a postanal repair. The aim of this study was to assess the results of postanal repair in patients with idiopathic or neurogenic fecal incontinence and to evaluate the role of various parameters, including preoperative physiologic testing on outcome.

METHODS

Postanal repair was offered by a single surgeon to patients meeting the following criteria: incontinence score of at least 12 of 20, absence of an isolated anterior external anal sphincter defect, and failed conservative, medical, and biofeedback management. Physiologic investigation and clinical findings of female patients who had postanal repair for fecal incontinence between 1992 and 1998 were reviewed. Physiologic investigation included anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, concentric needle electromyography, and endoanal ultrasonography. Follow-up was obtained by telephone questionnaire; moreover, patients were asked to grade the outcome of their surgery as excellent or good (success) or as fair or poor (failure).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients of median age 68 (range, 40-80) years had a mean duration of fecal incontinence before postanal repair of 6.8 (range, 0.5-22) years. Twenty patients (95 percent) were available for at least one year of follow-up. Seventeen patients (80.9 percent) had at least one prior vaginal delivery, and prior sphincteroplasty had been performed in 10 patients (47.6 percent). The morbidity and mortality rates were 5 and 0 percent, respectively. After a mean follow-up period of three (range, 1-7.5) years, seven patients (35 percent) considered surgery to be successful and had a statistically significant decrease in their incontinence score. Neither prolongation of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency nor external sphincter damage as noted on electromyography or any of the preoperative manometric parameters correlated with outcome. Furthermore, patients' ages at surgery did not correlate with the degree of postoperative improvement in continence scores nor did the duration of the patients' symptoms, number of vaginal deliveries, or a history of previous surgery for fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

None of the factors assessed was demonstrated to be predictive of outcome after postanal repair; moreover, the currently available preoperative testing has not altered the success rate, which remains low (35 percent). Despite the low success rate, the absence of any mortality and the low morbidity suggest that postanal repair may be a valid therapeutic approach. However, it should be offered only to selected patients with persistent, severe fecal incontinence despite an anatomically intact external anal sphincter who are not candidates for or refuse all other operative modalities.

Factors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of faecal incontinence may be categorized into procedures that either repair or augment the native sphincter mechanism or, alternatively, require construction of a neosphincter using either autologous tissue or an artificial device.

METHODS

This article reviews the currently available surgical options for the treatment of faecal incontinence, discusses factors predictive of outcome, and includes an algorithm for treatment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Procedures such as postanal repair, direct sphincter repair and reefing are seldom used. Overlapping repair has become the operation of choice in incontinent patients with isolated anterior defects in the external anal sphincter muscle, particularly in postobstetric trauma. Pudendal neuropathy seems to be a predictive factor of success, although this is not universally accepted. Total pelvic floor repair has been offered as a recent alternative. Neosphincter procedures include a gluteoplasty, non-stimulated and stimulated unilateral or bilateral graciloplasty and artificial bowel sphincter. The success and morbidity rates with the stimulated graciloplasty and artificial bowel sphincter appear similar. The newest alternative, sacral nerve stimulation, seems promising. In the final analysis, case selection and surgical judgement are probably the most important factors influencing the success of surgery for faecal incontinence. Presented as the Edinburgh Royal College of Surgeons invited lecture to the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Southport, UK, June 1999

Anorectal physiological testing before and after a successful sphincter repair: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Anorectal physiological testing often yields contradictory results in patients with faecal incontinence. This prospective study aims to determine if there are any discriminatory changes in anorectal physiological testing after a successful sphincter repair for sphincter defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1995 to 1998, 20 consecutive females who underwent a successful overlapping sphincter repair for sphincter defect were evaluated by anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic testing before and 2-4 months after surgery. The sphincter defect was diagnosed preoperatively by clinical and endosonographic examination, confirmed at surgery. The severity of faecal incontinence was evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Continence Score (0-20): 0 being perfect continence, and 20 being complete incontinence.

RESULTS

Of 20 consecutive patients who were improved following direct sphincter repair, 12 had significant improvement with a median score of 3 (range 1-6), while eight had mild improvement with a median score of 9 (range 7-12). There was a significant improvement in the mean resting anal canal pressure (80 vs 50 mmHg; P=0.016), maximum squeeze anal canal pressure (120 vs 80 mmHg; P=0.0002) and functional anal canal length (3 vs 2 cm; P=0.0069) post-operatively, with significant improvement in faecal continence following sphincter repair. However, a mild improvement in faecal continence was not associated with any significant changes in the mean resting anal canal pressure (50 vs 40 mmHg; P=0.089), maximum squeeze anal canal pressures (100 vs 100 mmHg; P=0.19) or functional anal canal length (2 vs 2 cm; P=0.47).

CONCLUSION

Marked improvement of faecal continence after overlapping sphincter repair is reflected by a marked increase in the mean resting anal canal pressure, maximum squeeze anal canal pressures and functional anal canal length.

Randomized trial of fecal diversion for sphincter repair

PURPOSE

Fecal diversion for sphincter repair is controversial. This randomized trial assessed whether fecal diversion would improve primary wound healing and functional outcome after sphincter repair.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with fecal incontinence requiring sphincter repair were recruited, but only 27 agreed to be randomly assigned to a defunctioning stoma (n = 13) or no stoma (n = 14). Patients were assessed by the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (0-20) and anal physiology; the mean follow-up was 34 (range, 16-47) months.

RESULTS

Incontinence score improved significantly in both groups (stoma, 13.5-7.8; P = 0.0072; no stoma, 14-9.6; P = 0.0470): No difference was found between the two groups. Maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure increased significantly only in the no-stoma group (maximum resting pressure, 52.4-71.3 cm H2O; maximum squeeze pressure, 87.3-100.7 cm H2O; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in functional outcome (stoma, 7.8; no stoma, 9.6; P = 0.4567) or the number with complications of sphincter repair (stoma, 5; no stoma, 3; P = 0.4197). However, stoma-related complications occurred in 7 of 13 patients having a stoma (parastomal hernia, 2; prolapsed stoma, 1; incisional hernia at the stoma site requiring repair, 5; and wound infection at the closure site, 1).

CONCLUSION

Fecal diversion in sphincter repair is unnecessary, because it gives no benefit in terms of wound healing or functional outcome, and it is a source of morbidity.

Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence

PURPOSE

This study was designed to analyze critically the short-term and long-term outcome of sphincteroplasty and to identify high-risk factors.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with fecal incontinence associated with an ultrasound defect of the external anal sphincter were treated by anal sphincteroplasty. Clinical and physiologic assessment was made before surgery, and clinical evaluation was made three months and an average of 40 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The evaluation of 86 patients three months after surgery showed that 42 patients were totally continent (49 percent), 28 were incontinent for gas (33 percent), and 16 still had fecal incontinence (19 percent). Seventy-four patients (86 percent) were contacted 40 months after surgery. Twenty-one patients (28 percent) were totally continent, 17 were incontinent to gas (23 percent), and 36 were incontinent to feces (49 percent). Forty-six percent of patients felt they were clearly improved after surgery. Poor results were associated with an internal anal sphincter defect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that in the long term, one-third of patients are totally continent after sphincteroplasty. One-half of patients are satisfied, but only if their incontinence to feces has totally disappeared. Results of sphincteroplasty deteriorate with time. One factor in poor prognosis is the presence of an associated defect of the internal anal sphincter.

Is there a role for the colorectal team in the management of acute severe third-degree vaginal tears?

OBJECTIVE

The repair of sphincter injuries following vaginal delivery is often inadequate. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term impact of involving a colorectal team in the management of patients with complicated acute severe third-degree tears.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 1-year period, four women (age 29-31 years) with acute severe third-degree tears extending into the anal canal or rectum were referred to the colorectal unit for repair of the injury. The internal anal sphincter (IAS) was identified and imbricated. A nerve stimulator was used to help identify the external anal sphincter (EAS) which was repaired using an overlapping technique. The women were reassessed at 3 months with anal manometry, pudendal nerve latencies and anal ultrasound. Further clinical assessment was performed at 1 year.

RESULTS

Anal ultrasound revealed intact EAS repairs in all four women, although the IAS was thinned anteriorly in two. Resting anal pressures were slightly low (range 40-56 cmH2 O) but satisfactory squeeze pressures were obtained in all four women (range 78-100 cmH2 O). Pudendal nerve latencies were normal in three and prolonged on one side in the fourth woman. At 1 year, three were continent to solids, liquids and flatus, incontinence score=0, but one had occasional urgency. The fourth experienced occasional liquid seepage and frequent incontinence to flatus likely to represent IAS dysfunction (incontinence score=7).

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory short-term results may be achieved following repair of acute severe third-degree tears and a nerve stimulator is important in identifying viable EAS to be used in repair. An integrated approach involving the experience of the colorectal team and anorectal physiology permits planning of future deliveries and may improve the long-term outcome.

A pilot study of total pelvic floor repair or gluteus maximus transposition for postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report pilot data comparing the morbidity and functional outcome of total pelvic floor repair with gluteus maximus transposition for women with postobstetric fecal incontinence.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized trial of two surgical procedures in 24 women so far. Functional assessment was performed with use of a 20-point clinical incontinence score and patient questionnaire before and after operation. The physiologic parameters, before and after operation, included resting and squeeze anal pressures, length of the high pressure zone, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity, and pudendal nerve latency.

RESULTS

So far, 12 patients have been treated by total pelvic floor repair and 12 by gluteus maximus transposition. Of these, three patients developed wound complications after gluteus maximus transposition compared with none after total pelvic floor repair. Among these cases there was a significant overall improvement in functional score (given as mean +/- standard deviation) after both total pelvic floor repair (13.1 +/- 2.7 vs. 6.6 +/- 4.5; P < 0.001) and gluteus maximus transposition (13.8 +/- 3.8 vs. 7.7 +/- 6.1; P < 0.01), although no difference existed between the groups. There was no change in any of the physiologic measurements after either operation, and preoperative measurements did not identify patients likely to do badly.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude from these preliminary data that both total pelvic floor repair and gluteus maximus transposition significantly improve continence in women with postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence. Gluteus maximus transposition gives equivalent results to total pelvic floor repair. Neither procedure has any influence on anorectal physiologic parameters.

Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty

PURPOSE

This study assessed the efficacy of anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty and parameters predictive of a successful outcome.

METHODS

Clinical findings and physiologic investigations of female patients who underwent anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence between 1988 and 1996 were reviewed. The extent of sphincter damage was assessed at needle electromyography as the number of quadrants exhibiting decreased motor unit potentials. Prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies were those of greater than 2.2 ms. The size of the endoanal ultrasound defect was assessed as degrees circumference of the external sphincter in which viable muscle was absent. Patients were reviewed by telephone questionnaire and were asked to grade the outcome of their surgery as excellent or good (success) or fair or poor (failure). Incontinence was graded using a scoring system of 0 (perfect continence) to 20 (complete incontinence).

RESULTS

There were 100 patients who had an overlapping sphincteroplasty; complete follow-tip information was obtained for 77 patients at a median of 24 (range, 2-96) months. The median age was 47 (range, 25-80) years and they had a median duration of incontinence of four (range, 0.1-39) years. Prior sphincteroplasty had been performed in 30 patients with a median of one (range, 1-7) operations. Investigations performed included electromyography (n = 49), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (n = 71), endoanal ultrasound (n = 49), and manometry (n = 67). Sixty percent of patients had improved continence and 42 (55 percent) considered their surgery to have been successful as attested to by a significant decrease in their incontinence score (from 15.1 +/- 4.5 to 4.3 +/- 4.2; P < 0.0001). Neither patient age, parity, prior sphincteroplasty, cause or duration of incontinence, extent of electromyography damage, size of the endoanal ultrasound defect, nor any manometric parameter correlated with outcome. However, 62 percent of 59 patients with bilaterally normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies had a successful outcome compared with only 16.7 percent of 12 patients with unilateral or bilateral prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies are the only factors predictive of long-term success after overlapping sphincteroplasty.

A clinical approach to fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is the impaired ability to control gas or stool. It is a disabling and distressing condition. Its exact incidence and prevalence are unknown. It is a disorder about which patients are frequently reluctant to discuss, even with their physician. However, it is a common condition especially in older individuals, where the prevalence has been reported to approach 60%. In women, incontinence reaches 54% as a result of childbirth. Of the patients surgically treated, the female-to-male ratio is 4 to 1. In an epidemiological study to identify its community-based prevalence, the University of Illinois determined fecal incontinence existed in 2.2% of the general population. There is available treatment for fecal incontinence. Many patients improve with conservative treatment (constipating agents, antidiarrheal medications, dietary changes) or with biofeedback. For patients where conservative treatment has failed, surgical treatment (direct-apposition sphincter repair, overlapping sphincteroplasty, postanal repair, neosphincter procedures) may be successful.

Management of faecal incontinence following obstetric injury

BACKGROUND

Faecal incontinence is common in women and the major aetiological factor is childbirth. Increasing numbers of women with faecal incontinence are presenting to surgical clinics.

METHODS

A literature review was performed on Medline database for English language publications an obstetric injury. The incidence, presentation, assessment and treatment of faecal incontinence following obstetric injury were evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Third-degree tear occurs in association with less than 1 per cent of vaginal deliveries, but occult sphincter injury occurs at one-third of deliveries and may be significant in later life. Incontinence may result from sphincter damage or nerve injury, or both. Risk factors for these injuries can be identified. Clinical evaluation, anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasonography allow accurate planning of subsequent surgery. Overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair provides symptomatic control of continence in 80 per cent of patients. Repair of an acute anal sphincter injury after a third-degree tear is controversial and a defined policy should be agreed between obstetric and colorectal teams.

Successful overlapping anal sphincter repair: relationship to patient age, neuropathy, and colostomy formation

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence from single anal sphincter defects are surgically remedial and commonly the result of obstetric injuries. Overlapping anal sphincter repair has previously been associated in small series with good results in 69 to 97 percent of patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess the results of overlapping anal sphincter repair in one institution and to assess the effects of age, presence of a neuropathy, and addition of a temporary colostomy on the success of surgery.

METHODS

A study of 57 overlapping anal sphincter repairs in 56 (54 females) patients at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital during a six-year period was performed. All patients were investigated preoperatively with endoanal ultrasound and concentric needle electromyography. Patients have been assessed prospectively since 1994 with a questionnaire, including a four-point Likert scale of continence level, the St. Mark's incontinence scoring system (range, 0-13), the Pescatori incontinence scoring system (range, 0-6), and patient assessment of success or failure of the overlapping anal sphincter repair. A colostomy was selectively formed in conjunction with an overlapping anal sphincter repair in 21 patients (8 preoperatively, 13 simultaneously), and 18 patients had a concomitant neuropathy (3 unilateral, 15 bilateral).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 18 months, median continence scores overall had improved from St. Mark's incontinence scoring 13 to 3 (P < 0.0001) and Pescatori incontinence scoring 6 to 2 (P < 0.0001). Forty-nine of 57 (86 percent) repairs have been successful, and 8 are considered to be failures. Twenty-one of 27 (78 percent) repairs in patients younger than 40 years of age were successful, as were 28 of 30 (93 percent) repairs in patients older than 40 years of age (P = 0.10). Four of 18 (22 percent) repairs associated with a neuropathy failed compared with 4 of 39 (10 percent) without a neuropathy (P = 0.21). Improved or normal continence was achieved in 17 of 21 (81 percent) patients with a stoma and overlapping anal sphincter repair and in 32 of 36 (89 percent) patients with an overlapping anal sphincter repair alone (P = 0.32). The presence of a stoma did not improve the rate of wound healing by primary intention (62 percent for stoma vs. 64 percent for overlapping anal sphincter repair alone; P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Single anal sphincter defects can be successfully treated with an overlapping anal sphincter repair. There is no improvement in primary healing with selective stoma formation. Age of the patient and presence of a neuropathy should not detract from proceeding with overlapping anal sphincter repair when singular anal sphincter defects are detected on endoanal ultrasound in muscle that is still active.

Variation in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency according to disease

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were first to establish whether any difference among pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) values exists relative to diagnosis, second to determine whether left and right latencies are similar, and third to assess any correlation between age and neuropathy. Latency was elicited three times on each side, and an average latency was recorded as a result.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 1989 and April 1995, 1,026 patients (775 females and 251 males) underwent PNTML study. These patients were divided into four groups according to diagnosis: Group I, fecal incontinence; Group II, chronic constipation; Group III, idiopathic rectal pain; Group IV, rectal prolapse. Overall mean age was 61.5 (range, 6-95) years. Student's t-test was used to calculate statistical differences. Patients were then analyzed according to age and gender. Correlation was calculated with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Unilateral or bilateral prolongation of PNTML was noted in 90 patients (21.2 percent) in Group I, 80 (20.4 percent) in Group II, 22 (18.1 percent) in Group III, and 38 (42.6 percent) in Group IV. Average PNTML on the left side was 1.88 ms in Group I, 1.94 ms in Group II, 1.98 ms in Group III, and 2.12 ms in Group IV. Average PNTML on the right side was 1.85 ms in Group I, 1.94 ms in Group II, 1.99 ms in Group III, and 2.07 ms in Group IV. The only statistically significant differences in PNTML were between Groups I and IV (left, P < 0.005; right, < 0.05) and between females and males (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is no statistically significant difference between latencies of left and right pudendal nerves. Similarly, there are no statistically significant differences among patients with fecal incontinence, chronic constipation, or chronic idiopathic rectal pain. Normal latency can be expected in patients with constipation or fecal incontinence. However, patients with rectal prolapse have a more prolonged PNTML. Age is correlated with a higher incidence of pudendal neuropathy. This study reveals significant overlap among PNTML values and diagnosis.

Stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation. Initial experience, pitfalls, and complications

PURPOSE

The stimulated gracilis neosphincter is accepted as a viable option in select patients with fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to review the initial problems and complications.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of all patients who underwent this procedure was undertaken. Stage I consisted of the distal vascular delay of the muscle and creation of a temporary stoma. Stage II was the transposition of the muscle and implantation of the stimulator and electrodes. Low frequency electrical stimulation was applied to the muscle for 12 weeks, after which Stage III (stoma closure) was undertaken.

RESULTS

From March 1993 to December 1995, 17 patients (9 females and 8 males) with a mean age of 42.2 (range, 19-72) years underwent the procedure. One patient died from pancreatitis and another from small-bowel adenocarcinoma, three and six months after the procedure, respectively. Two patients (one with Crohn's disease) required permanent stomas. One additional patient required a permanent stoma because of lead fibrosis. Other complications noted during ascent of the learning curve included seroma of the thigh incision, excoriation of the skin above the stimulator, fecal impaction, anal fissure, parastomal hernia, rotation of the stimulator, premature battery discharge, fracture of the lead, perineal skin irritation, perineal sepsis, rupture of the tendon, tendon erosion, muscle fatigue during programming sessions, and electrode displacement from the nerve or fibrosis around the nerve. However, ultimately after rectification of these problems, 13 of the 15 eligible patients had stoma reversal. Manometric results showed an average basal pressure of 43 mmHg and an average maximum squeeze pressure that increased from 36 mmHg before surgery to 145 mmHg by stimulation (P < 0.01). Based on objective functional questionnaires, 9 of 15 (60 percent) evaluable patients reported improvement in continence, social interactions, and quality of life. Three of these nine patients require daily use of enemas.

CONCLUSION

Although the stimulated gracilis operation is a feasible procedure for selected patients with severe incontinence, the learning curve is steep. Although the ultimate outcome in a selected group of patients can be very gratifying, major technical modifications are required before use beyond a research protocol setting. Furthermore, patients must have the psychological strength, emotional commitment, and financial resources that may be necessary for multiple revisional surgeries or ultimate device failure.