Transperineal ultrasonography in perianal Crohn's disease and recurrent cryptogenic fistula-in-ano

AIM

Successful anal fistula care is aided by specialized imaging accurately defining the site of the internal opening and fistula type. Imaging techniques are complementary, designed to answer specific anatomical questions. There are limited data concerning the clinical value of transperineal ultrasound (TP-US) in both cryptogenic fistula-in-ano and perianal Crohn's disease (PACD). The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of TP-US compared with operative findings in patients with perirectal sepsis.

METHOD

Patients with recurrent cryptogenic anal fistula and PACD referred for sonography were examined using TP-US by a single examiner blinded to the operative results. Fistulae were categorized by the Parks classification predicting the site of the internal fistula opening. Ancillary horseshoe collections, abscesses and secondary tracks were defined.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with PACD and 27 patients with recurrent cryptogenic fistula-in-ano were analysed with comparative images and operative data. Correlation of fistula type for cryptogenic and PACD patients respectively was 23/27 (85.2%) and 12/14 (85.7%), with a correlative internal opening site (when found at surgery) of 16/22 (72.3%) and 12/14 (85.7%). Misclassification of fistula type in cryptogenic cases occurred in the presence of ancillary abscesses with associated acoustic shadowing. In PACD patients, TP-US was used when anal stenosis precluded endoanal ultrasonography, assisting in the diagnosis of recto-vaginal fistulae.

CONCLUSION

TP-US is a useful complementary technique to assess fistula-in-ano and has special advantage when there is anal canal distortion, complex fistula type or suspicion of a recto-vaginal fistula.

Ultrasound in the investigation of posterior compartment vaginal prolapse and obstructed defecation

Recent developments in diagnostic imaging have made gynecologists, colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists realize as never before that they share a common interest in anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction. While we often may be using different words to describe the same phenomenon (e.g. anismus/vaginismus) or attributing different meanings to the same words (e.g. rectocele), we look after patients with problems that transcend the borders of our respective specialties. Like no other diagnostic modality, imaging helps us understand each other and provides new insights into conditions we all need to learn to investigate better in order to improve clinical management. In this review we attempt to show what modern ultrasound imaging can contribute to the diagnostic work-up of patients with posterior vaginal wall prolapse, obstructed defecation and rectal intussusception/prolapse. In summary, it is evident that translabial/perineal ultrasound can serve as a first-line diagnostic tool in women with such complaints, replacing defecation proctography and MR proctography in a large proportion of female patients. This is advantageous for the women themselves because ultrasound is much better tolerated, as well as for healthcare systems since sonographic imaging is much less expensive. However, there is a substantial need for education, which currently remains unmet.

Ultrasonographic assessment of patients referred with chronic anal pain to a tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal pain is relatively common as a presentation to specialist physicians and surgeons. Currently, it is regarded as a functional disorder upon the exclusion of occult intersphincteric sepsis. Our study assessed an unselected cohort of patients presenting with chronic previously undiagnosed anal pain using routine ultrasonography.

METHODS

All patients referred to a tertiary gastroenterology service between January 2005 and January 2008 with a diagnosis of chronic anal pain (>3 months duration with no clinical anorectal signs) underwent endoanal and static and dynamic transperineal ultrasound to assess for the frequency and pattern of occult intersphincteric sepsis.

RESULTS

Of 1,580 patients referred, there were 146 presenting with chronic anal pain as a main symptom. Of these, 37 (25.3%) had intersphincteric sepsis (ISS) diagnosed with ultrasound examination with 17 undergoing evaluable surgery. There was a male preponderance (70.3%) with the diagnosis being made in 46% of cases after 6 months of symptoms and with 80.8% having posteriorly located sepsis. This occurred on a background of 62% having previous acute proctological conditions. There was complete ultrasonographic and operative concordance with 15 becoming asymptomatic after surgery at a mean follow-up of 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Occult intersphincteric sepsis is not uncommon and is diagnosed using routine ultrasonography at the time of clinical presentation. Endoanal and transperineal ultrasound is recommended as part of the investigative armamentarium to exclude categorization as functional anorectal pain. This is currently not part of the Rome III coding for such a diagnosis suggesting a revision of these diagnostic criteria for the ultimate diagnosis of functional proctalgia.

A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Cul-de-sac hernias (enterocele and peritoneocele) are difficult to diagnose in patients presenting with primary evacuatory difficulty. Failure to recognize their presence in patients undergoing surgery may lead to poor functional outcome. Accurate diagnosis requires specialized investigation including dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) or dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Recently, dynamic transperineal ultrasonography (DTP-US) has been used for this purpose. This study compares DEP with DTP-US for the diagnosis of cul-de-sac hernias in those patients presenting with evacuatory dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-two female patients with chronically obstructed defecation underwent blinded clinical, DEP, and DTP-US assessment to define the accuracy of diagnosis of cul-de-sac hernias.

RESULTS

Both the DEP and the DTP-US techniques show concordance for the diagnosis of cul-de-sac hernias in an unselected patient cohort. Patients in both groups have the same duration of constipation with a greater likelihood of prior hysterectomy in those with cul-de-sac hernias. The diagnosis was established separately by DEP in 88% and in 82% of the cases by DTP-US. Transperineal sonography is discordant with DEP in 45% of cases once the diagnosis of cul-de-sac hernia is made, over the contents of the hernia and over the degree of transvaginal enterocele descent, where DTP-US tends to upgrade enterocele severity. Both techniques confirm the high incidence of concomitant pelvic floor compartment pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods have accuracy for the diagnosis of cul-de-sac hernias in those patients presenting with evacuatory difficulty. Transperineal sonography tends to more readily diagnose peritoneocele and to upgrade enterocele extent. As an office procedure, it is a valuable adjunct to the clinical examination in the diagnosis of cul-de-sac hernia.

Conventional cutting vs. internal anal sphincter-preserving seton for high trans-sphincteric fistula: a prospective randomized manometric and clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cutting setons have been used in complicated perirectal sepsis with good effect, although there is a moderately high incidence of fecal leakage after their use. The aim of this study was to compare a modified cutting seton, which repaired the internal anal sphincter muscle and re-routed the seton through the intersphincteric space, with a conventional cutting seton.

METHODS

A total of 34 patients were randomized between 1998 and 2002. They were prospectively assessed by continence score and anorectal manometry, and for anal function, clinical sepsis and fistula recurrence.

RESULTS

There was no difference in postoperative continence score, incidence of recurrent fistula or healing time between groups after a mean follow-up of 12 months. Resting anal manometric pressures and vector volumes were consistently higher with the modified seton (although not statistically significant), as was the area under the inhibitory curve during elicitation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex across the full sphincter length. ( p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

A larger prospective study of internal anal sphincter-preserving seton use in cryptogenic high transshincteric fistula-in-ano appears justified.

Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Defecating proctography has been traditionally used to assess patients with evacuatory dysfunction. More recently, dynamic transperineal ultrasound has been described, defining the interaction between the infralevator viscera and the pelvic floor at rest and during straining. This study compared qualitative diagnosis and quantitative measurement obtained by defecography and dynamic transperineal ultrasonography in patients with evacuatory difficulty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three women were examined using both techniques with both examiners blinded to the results of the other method. Quantitative measurement was made of rectocele depth, anorectal angle (at rest and during maximal straining) and anorectal junction position at rest and movement during straining.

RESULTS

There was good agreement for the diagnoses of rectocele, rectoanal intususseption, and rectal prolapse. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound was more likely than defecography to make multiple diagnoses or to diagnose an enterocele when a rectocele was present. There was no difference noted between the two techniques for the measurement of anorectal angle at rest, anorectal junction position at rest, or anorectal junction movement during straining. The mean anorectal angle during straining was 123.3+/-4.3 degrees as measured by defecography and 116.4+/-3.3 degrees as measured by dynamic transperineal ultrasound, nearly reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is a simple and accurate technique for assessment of the pelvic floor and soft-tissues in patients with evacuatory dysfunction.

Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management

BACKGROUND

Rectocele is a common finding in patients with intractable evacuatory disorders. Although much rectocele surgery is conducted by gynecologists en passant with other forms of vaginal surgery, many reports lack appreciation of the importance of coincident anorectal symptoms, and do not report functional and clinical outcome data. The pathogenesis of rectocele is still controversial, as is the embryological and anatomical importance of the rectovaginal septum as well as recognizable defects in its integrity and its relevance in formal repair when rectocele is operated upon as the principal condition in patients with intractable evacuatory difficulty.

DISCUSSION

The investigation and surgical management of rectocele is controversial given the relatively small numbers of operated patients in any single specialist unit and the relative lack of prospective data concerning functional outcome in operated cases. The imaging of rectocele patients is currently in a state of change, and the newer diagnostic modalities including dynamic magnetic resonance imaging frequently display a multiplicity of pelvic floor disorders. When surgery is indicated, coloproctologists most commonly utilize an endorectal defect-specific repair, but there are few controlled randomized data regarding outcome and response criteria of specific symptoms with particular surgical approaches. A Medline-based literature search was conducted for this review to assess the clinical results of defect-specific rectocele repairs using the endorectal, transvaginal, transperineal, or combined approaches. Only the studies are included that report both pre- and postoperative symptoms including constipation, evacuatory difficulty, pelvic pain, the impression of a pelvic mass, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia or the need for assisted digitation to aid defecation.

CONCLUSION

The history of rectocele repair, its clinical and diagnostic features and the advantages, disadvantages and indications for the different surgical techniques are presented in this review. Suggested diagnostic and surgical therapeutic algorithms for management have been included. It is recommended that a multicenter controlled randomized trial comparing surgical approaches for symptomatic evacuatory dysfunction where rectocele is the principal abnormality should be conducted.

The pathology and molecular biology of anal intraepithelial neoplasia: comparisons with cervical and vulvar intraepithelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a well-described pathological precursor of invasive squamous cell carcinoma which has recently been detected with increasing frequency in immunocompromised patients, particularly those with seropositivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The epidemiology and natural history of this entity is somewhat unclear, since the overall prevalence in the HIV seronegative population is unknown.

DISCUSSION

There is a clear etiological association between AIN and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) subtype infection although there is great variability in HPV DNA detection of cytological and histological material in these patients. It appears that there is an antigen-specific hyporesponsiveness by cytotoxic lymphocytes against HPV peptide sequences or recombinant proteins encoded by oncogenic HPV subtypes in these patients, which is dependent upon the stage of their HIV-associated disease. Although the molecular biology of AIN and cervical or vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia are comparable, in AIN there is less significance of tumor suppressor gene mutations, proto-oncogenic growth factor activation, and genomic instability.

CONCLUSION

Current concepts in the epidemiology and etiology of AIN are discussed, as well as its immunological response in the HIV-positive population, drawing parallels where possible between other HPV-related preinvasive disorders, and concluding with a suggested management protocol

The management of presacral masses in the adult

Presacral (retrorectal) tumors are particularly rare in the adult. There is difficulty in the performance of diagnostic biopsy, and specialized imaging is required to plan surgical extirpation. This review assesses their incidence and classification as well as the principles involved in their diagnosis and surgical management.

Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery

PURPOSE

Fecal leakage after open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure is common, but underreported. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the physiologic and morphologic effects of sphincterotomy, comparing continent and incontinent patients after surgery. This group was further compared with an unselected group of patients presenting with incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and June 1999, 23 patients were prospectively followed up through internal sphincterotomy with conventional and vector volume anorectal manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Fourteen continent patients were compared with 9 incontinent postoperative cases, 9 patients referred with incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy, and 33 healthy volunteers without anorectal disease.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted between continent and incontinent postsphincterotomy cases for all resting conventional and vector volume parameters and for some squeeze parameters. Although there was a significant reduction in postoperative high pressure zone length at rest, there were no differences between the postoperative groups. There was an increase in sphincter asymmetry of 6.7 percent (+/- 3.5 percent) in incontinent postsphincterotomy patients and a decrease of 2.8 percent (+/- 3.2 percent) in continent cases. Significant differences were noted for resting parameters between incontinent postsphincterotomy and posthemorrhoidectomy patients, with a higher resting sphincter asymmetry in the latter group. The area under the rectoanal inhibitory curve was smaller in postsphincterotomy incontinent patients when compared with continent cohorts over the distal and intermediate sphincter zones at rest with a reduced latency of inhibition. There was no difference in the magnetic resonance images of the sphincterotomy site between incontinent and continent postsphincterotomy cases and no posthemorrhoidectomy case had evidence of sphincteric damage.

CONCLUSION

There are complex significant differences in the postoperative physiology of patients undergoing lateral internal sphincterotomy who become incontinent when compared with those who maintain continence. These physiologic changes are not reflected in detectable morphologic sphincteric differences. It is unknown whether these changes predict for long-term incontinence, and it is suggested that postoperative incontinence after minor anorectal surgery is not necessarily related either to a preexisting sphincter defect or inadvertent intraoperative sphincter injury.

Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization

Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were assessed by conventional anorectal manometry, vector manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and defecography. Subjects included 33 volunteer controls without anorectal disease, 14 patients with type I rectocele, and 26 patients with type II rectocele. Significant differences were noted for resting pressure measurements (maximal resting anal pressure and vector volume) between rectocele types and between type I patients and controls. Significant differences were noted for squeeze parameters (maximal squeeze pressure and vector volume) only between rectocele types. There were minimal differences in parameters of the RAIR, with a reduced slope of inhibition in the proximal sphincter for both rectocele groups and a reduced maximal inhibitory pressure in the intermediate and distal sphincter of type 1 rectocele patients. There were no differences in transient excitation of the pressure wave during the RAIR reflex to account for pressure variations with no measured differences in rectocele depth (type 1, 2.87 +/- 0.7 cm; type 2, 2.84 +/- 1.4 cm) There are few physiological differences between the different clinical categories of rectocele patients based on the presence or absence of associated genital prolapse.