Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple colorectal metastases to the liver

The management of colorectal liver metastases: Expanding the role of hepatic resection in the age of multimodal therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) caused nearly 204,000 deaths in Europe in 2004. Despite recent advances in the treatment of advanced disease, which include the incorporation of two new cytotoxic agents irinotecan and oxaliplatin into first-line regimens, the concept of planned sequential therapy involving three active agents during the course of a patient's treatment and the integrated use of targeted monoclonal antibodies, the 5-year survival rates for patients with advanced CRC remain unacceptably low. For patients with colorectal liver metastases, liver resection offers the only potential for cure. This review, based on the outcomes of a meeting of European experts (surgeons and medical oncologists), considers the current treatment strategies available to patients with CRC liver metastases, the criteria for the selection of those patients most likely to benefit and suggests where future progress may occur.

Does anatomic versus nonanatomic resection affect recurrence and survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastasis?

Anatomic resection of colorectal liver metastases may offer a survival advantage because (1) it removes the hepatic functional unit as a whole and (2) nonanatomic resection has been reported to have a higher incidence of positive margins.A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. 183 patients met inclusion criteria of undergoing either anatomic or nonanatomic resection with the aim of removing all gross disease. Mean age was 61 years (range 31-90 years), 57% were male. 89 patients (49%) underwent nonanatomic resection, the remaining 94 (51%) had anatomic resection. Average duration of inflow occlusion was 10 min. Average length of stay was 7.4 days. There were three deaths, yielding a 1.6% 30-day mortality rate. There was no difference in the incidence of positive margins between types of resection. Recurrence was 27%, 55%, and 59% at 1, 3, and 5 years respectively. Overall survival was 89%, 67%, and 55% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Type of resection was not associated with significant differences in recurrence or survival even when adjusted for differences in preoperative risk.We conclude that hepatic resection for colorectal metastases can be performed safely and offers select patients with stage IV disease prolonged survival. Resection type should be based on the number and location of tumors, rather than on segmental anatomy. An emphasis on the preservation of hepatic parenchyma may be of increasing importance in the setting of chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis, and the growing number of patients undergoing repeated metastasectomy.

Survival and recurrence after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and liver resection for colorectal metastases: a ten year study

BACKGROUND

Currently liver resection offers the only potential cure for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We prospectively audited the outcome of CRLM treated by a combination of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

METHODS

283 consecutive patients underwent liver resection for CRLM over 10 years with curative intent. Patients received chemotherapy preoperatively for synchronous and early (< 2 years) metachronous metastases. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 90%, 59.2% and 46.1%, respectively. Disease free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 68.1%, 34.8% and 27.9%, respectively. Operative mortality was 2.1% and morbidity was 23.7%. Patients with macroscopic diaphragm invasion by tumour, CEA > 100 ng/ml, tumour size > 5 cm or cancer involved resection margins (CIRM) had a significantly worse overall survival. Incidence of CIRM and re-resection was 4.9% and 4.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery is associated with improved survival and low CIRM and re-resection rates.

Preoperative chemotherapy does not increase morbidity or mortality of hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases

Hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer (mCRC) is best treated with a multidisciplinary approach. Conflicting data exist regarding the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. We hypothesized that preoperative chemotherapy does not adversely impact complications or mortality associated with hepatectomy. A retrospective analysis was performed and included patients with mCRC who underwent hepatectomy from 1996 to 2006. Patients were separated into two groups: those who received preoperative chemotherapy and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with morbidity and mortality. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to determine disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred eighty-six patients were analyzed: 112 (60%) received preoperative chemotherapy for a median of 4.2 months. Eighty patients (43%) underwent major hepatectomy. When comparing the two groups, there were no differences in hepatic tumor size (median 3 cm; p = 0.35), type of resection (p = 0.62), stage (p = 0.44) or location (p = 0.10) of the primary tumor, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.80), or number of nodes in lymphadenectomy (p = 0.62). Only number of positive nodes after colectomy (p = 0.02), age (p < or = 0.0001), and combined resection/radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (p = 0.004) were statistically different between the two groups. There was no difference in rates of morbidity (p = 0.81), mortality (p = 0.29), DFS (p = 0.25) or OS (p = 0.30). We conclude that the use of preoperative chemotherapy did not increase the risk of complications or death for patients undergoing hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy appears to be safe and is an important part of the multidisciplinary approach for this disease.

Preoperative bevacizumab does not significantly increase postoperative complication rates in patients undergoing hepatic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases

PURPOSE

Although bevacizumab (BV) increases survival rates when used with chemotherapy (CTX) in patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), an increase in wound complications has been observed in patients who undergo surgery while receiving BV. We therefore evaluated whether neoadjuvant BV is associated with an increase in postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for CRC liver metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two subgroups of patients who received neoadjuvant CTX + BV (n = 81) or CTX alone (n = 44) were identified from a database of patients who underwent surgery for CRC liver metastases. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of patient and tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, and operative factors with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications developed in 40 patients (49%) who received CTX + BV and 19 patients (43%) who received CTX. The median time from BV discontinuation to surgery was 58 days (range, 31 to 117 days). No significant associations were identified between BV use and timing of BV discontinuation and postoperative complications. On multivariate analysis, lower serum albumin and concomitant surgical procedures were associated with an increased risk of developing any complication (P = .035 and .023, respectively), and lower serum albumin was associated with hepatobiliary complications (P = .016).

CONCLUSION

Neither the use of BV nor timing of BV administration was associated with an increase in complication rates. These data suggest that the combination of BV with neoadjuvant CTX in patients who have CRC liver metastases does not increase surgical complications. To determine the optimal timing of surgery in patients receiving neoadjuvant BV, confirmatory prospective studies are required.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent malignant disease in industrialized nations. The annual incidence of invasive CRC in the U.S. is among the highest in the world, and the liver is the only metastatic site in approximately one third of patients. Without treatment, patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis; however, long-term survival benefits and even cure have been reported in patients undergoing surgical resection of metastases. In addition, advances in chemotherapy, imaging, and surgical techniques have increased the proportion of patients who are eligible for resection. Combination therapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin has been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic CRC; however, the introduction of newer agents, such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and targeted agents, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, has yielded improvements in response rates (RRs) and survival. Maximizing the exposure of hepatic metastases to high target concentrations of cytotoxic drugs using hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) increases RRs further than with systemic chemotherapy; however, the impact of HAI on survival is unclear. As the goals of chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic CRC increasingly shift from palliation to prolongation of survival, improvement in RRs, and downsizing of tumors in order to enable or optimize resection, treatment in a multidisciplinary environment involving a medical oncologist, radiologist, and surgical oncologist with hepatobiliary expertise will become central to deciding the best course of therapy and timing of surgery.

Bilobar colorectal liver metastases: treatment options

Although prospective, randomized clinical trials never have been conducted, retrospective and comparative studies strongly indicate that hepatic resection is the only available treatment that allows long-term survival in colorectal carcinoma that has metastasized to the liver. Unfortunately, curative resection can be performed in less than 25% of the patients. Ten years ago, hepatic resection was contraindicated in case of multiple or bilobar nodules. Currently, the trend is to be more aggressive and to increase the indications for surgical resection with the development of new strategies using a multidisciplinary approach.

Hepatectomy for colorectal metastases in the presence of extrahepatic disease

This article focuses on hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in the presence of intra-abdominal extrahepatic disease. The results reported in the literature are reviewed, and the indications and contraindications for hepatectomy in patients who have CLM with extrahepatic disease are discussed in light of the available evidence.

Importance of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in potentially curable colorectal cancer liver metastases

Background

Surgical resection of liver metastases arising from colorectal cancer is considered the only curative treatment option. However, many patients subsequently experience disease recurrence. We prospectively investigated whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence following potentially curative liver resection. Special emphasis was directed to the importance of response.

Methods

50 patients with resectable liver metastases received neoadjuvant XELOX or FOLFOX4 for six cycles (3 months). Complete resection of liver metastases was intended thereafter. Assessments included response rate, postoperative morbidity and recurrence-free survival.

Results

An objective response was observed in 72% of all patients, including two complete responses. Chemotherapy was well tolerated and the majority of adverse events were mild to moderate (grade 1/2). Potentially curative R0 resection was performed in all patients and postoperative complications were observed in only 12%. The median recurrence-free survival was significantly influenced by tumor response with 24.7 months (95% CI: 4.50 to 44.97) in responding patients, 8.2 months (95% CI: 3.09 to 13.31) in patients with stable disease and 3.0 months (95% CI: 0 to 8.91) in patients with progressive disease.

Conclusion

These data suggest that neoadjuvant Oxaliplatin based chemotherapy provides high response rates without increased risk of perioperative morbidity. Response to chemotherapy can lead to long-term recurrence-free survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may identify best candidates for a potentially curative treatment approach.

Patterns of hepatotoxicity after chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess chemotherapy associated hepatotoxicity after 3 months' treatment and to correlate patterns of hepatotoxicity with perioperative morbidity.

METHODS

Liver specimens of 50 patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer receiving XELOX or FOLFOX4 for six cycles and 13 specimens of non-chemotherapy patients subjected to liver resection were analyzed. Different patterns of hepatotoxicity were evaluated according to widely accepted pathohistological scores. Furthermore, the histomorphological findings were correlated with perioperative morbidity.

RESULTS

Steatosis grades did not differ among the chemotherapy treated groups and non-chemotherapy patients. Chemotherapy showed an independent effect on fibrosis stage. Age and chemotherapy were independently associated with sinusoidal dilatation. Centrilobular vein fibrosis correlated with administration of chemotherapy. Higher fibrosis stages were associated with increased transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

XELOX and FOLFOX4 do not correlate with the development of steatosis or steatohepatitis. We do not detect a difference in liver injury between the XELOX and FOLFOX4 group. Although 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy may cause profound changes in liver parenchyma, it can be safely applied. However, age and oxaliplatin predispose for the development of sinusoidal dilatation; therefore caution must be taken in old patients treated with oxaliplatin.

Extending the frontiers of resectability in advanced colorectal cancer

AIM

To review the advances in the past decade that have enabled more patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to undergo curative hepatic resection.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review and pertinent data published on advanced CRLM from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were used for this review.

RESULTS

Criteria for resectability of CRLM have expanded with the advent of effective chemotherapy, improved surgical technique, and novel strategies such as preoperative volumetry, portal vein embolization, and two-stage hepatectomy. Despite the aggressiveness of these approaches to treating patients with advanced disease, recent series show an improvement in 5-year survival rate for patients with CRLM.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in multidisciplinary management and careful patient selection have enabled more patients to undergo curative resection for CRLM, with corresponding improvement in survival rates.

Neoadjuvant treatment before resection of liver metastases

Surgical resection remains the only treatment of colorectal liver metastases that can ensure long-term survival and cure in some patient. However, only a minority of patients with liver metastases are amenable to surgery. Other patients can benefit from modern chemotherapy regimens, which achieve high response rates but are rarely sufficient for cure. In patients with unresectable metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the number of candidates for potentially curative resection, hence affording these patients the possibility of prolonged survival. For patients with resectable metastases, it is likely that the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery will be demonstrated in the near future but is not yet validated. The integration of novel targeted agents will probably transform the therapeutic strategy for colorectal liver metastases.

The expanding role of PET technology in the management of patients with colorectal cancer

The therapeutic options and subsequent survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has increased substantially over recent years. While surgical excision of the primary cancer results in cure of approximately 50% of patients, recurrence and metastatic disease still remains a significant cause of death. Although resection of liver or lung metastases can result in cure, relapse rates remain high, indicating that patient selection needs improvement. Positron emission tomography (PET) technology has a great deal to offer with respect to CRC management, particularly in the setting of patient selection for metastasectomy and in the evaluation of possible recurrent disease, however it has not yet become a routine part of the management of all CRC patients. This review article aims to discuss the current and future implications of PET technology in the optimal management of CRC patients throughout their care pathway.

Improved Long-Term Outcome of Surgery for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases: Reasons and Implications for Management on the Basis of a Severity Score

BACKGROUND

The outcome of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) appears to be improving despite the fact that surgery is offered to patients with more-severe disease. To quantify this assumption and to understand its causes we analyzed a series of patients on the basis of a standardized severity score and changes in management occurring over the years.

METHODS

Patients' characteristics, operative data, chemotherapies and follow-up were recorded. CRLM severity was quantified according to Fong's clinical risk score (CRS), modified to take into account the presence of bilateral liver metastases. Three periods were analyzed, in which different indications, surgical strategies and uses of chemotherapy were applied: 1984-1992, 1993-1998, and 1999-2005.

RESULTS

Between January 1984 and December 2005, 210 liver resections were performed in 180 patients (1984-1992, 43 patients; 1993-1998, 42 patients; 1999-2005, 95 patients). CRLM severity increased throughout the time periods, as did the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapies, repeat resections, and multistep procedures. While the disease-free survival did not improve over time, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate increased from 85%, 30%, and 23% in the first period, to 88%, 60%, and 34% in the second period, and to 94%, 69%, and 46% in the third period.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis according to the CRS showed that despite the fact that patients had more severe disease, the overall survival improved over the years, mainly thanks to more aggressive treatment of recurrent disease. Management of advanced CRLM should, from the start, take into account the likelihood of secondary procedures.

Surgical therapy for colorectal metastases to the liver

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer in the West and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 35 to 55% of patients with colorectal cancer develop hepatic metastases during the course of their disease. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases represents the only chance at potential cure, and long-term survival can be achieved in 35 to 58% of patients after resection. The goal of hepatic resection should be to resect all metastases with negative histologic margins while preserving sufficient functional hepatic parenchyma. In patients with extensive metastatic disease who would otherwise be unresectable, ablative approaches can be used instead of or combined with hepatic resection. The use of portal vein embolization and preoperative chemotherapy may also expand the population of patients who are candidates for surgical treatment. Despite these advances, many patients still experience a recurrence after hepatic resection. More active systemic chemotherapy agents are now available and are being increasingly employed as adjuvant therapy either before or after surgery. Modern treatment of colorectal liver metastasis requires a multidisciplinary approach in an effort to increase the number of patients who may benefit from surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Preoperative chemotherapy and the outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy is being increasingly used prior to liver resection for colorectal metastases. Oxaliplatin has been implicated in causing structural changes to the liver parenchyma, and such changes may increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken of 101 consecutive patients who had undergone liver resection for colorectal metastases in two HPB centers. Preoperative demographic and premorbid data were gathered along with liver function tests and tumor markers. A subjective assessment of the surgical procedure was noted, and in-hospital morbidity and mortality were calculated. The effect of preoperative chemotherapy on short-term and long-term outcome was analyzed, and actuarial 1 and 3 year survival was determined.

RESULTS

Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a higher number of metastases (median 2, range 1-8 versus median 1, range 1-5; P = 0.019) and more had synchronous tumors (24 patients versus 8; P < 0.001). Overall morbidity was 37% and hospital mortality was 3.9%. Operative and in-hospital outcome was not influenced by chemotherapy. Long-term survival was worse in patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy (actuarial 3-year survival 62% versus 80%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no evidence that neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in particular oxaliplatin, increases the risk associated with liver resection for colorectal metastases. Long-term outcome is reduced in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy, although they have more advanced disease.

Laparoscopy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Patients with metastatic disease from colorectal cancer are now living twice as long as they were one decade ago. With this increasing life expectancy, we are beginning to see these patients strive for an acceptable and improved quality of life. Medical advances have led to unanswered questions regarding the role of surgery in metastatic colorectal cancer. Despite the increasing application of laparoscopy for primary treatment of colorectal cancer, the appropriate role for laparoscopy in patients with stage IV disease has yet to be defined. This review addresses this topic and suggests treatment algorithms for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. While unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer remains incurable at the current time, continued advances will inevitably challenge this presumption and it is crucial to outline the role of laparoscopy in this patient population.

Liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis

At some point in the natural course of colorectal cancer up to 50% of patients will develop metastasis to the liver. Historically only 20% of these patients would have to be deemed resectable, with an intent to cure, at the time of presentation. But with recent improvements in cross-sectional imaging, chemotherapeutic agents and advances in the techniques of surgical resection the emphasis of resection has now changed to 'who is not resectable' as opposed to 'who is resectable'. There are few contraindications to liver resection on the proviso that the patient is fit enough. As a result of this paradigm shift, 5 year survival rates are approaching 60%. Historically liver resection was perceived as a formidable operation but now liver resection for CRLM is safe and specialist centres are reporting mortality rates of less than 1%. This review briefly covers the standard techniques currently employed and some of the recent innovations being developed to improve resectability.

Shifting from clinical to biologic indicators of prognosis after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases

Following resection of hepatic colorectal metastases, there are few criteria for predicting which patients have more aggressive disease and are, therefore, more likely to experience recurrence and reduced survival. Traditionally, primary tumor stage, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, time from primary tumor treatment to diagnosis of hepatic metastases (disease-free interval), hepatic tumor size, number of hepatic metastases, and presence of extrahepatic disease have been reported to be predictors of survival after resection. However, the data regarding the prognostic importance of these clinicopathologic factors are inconsistent and conflicting. Therefore, conventional clinicopathologic factors may be inadequate for the purposes of prognostication. More recently, there has been increased interest in identifying biologic indicators that may help better define patients at risk for recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Recent studies have shown that proliferation markers such as p53 expression, tritiated thymidine uptake, thymidylate synthase, Ki-67, and human telomerase reverse transcriptase may be better predictors of outcome after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Moreover, tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy may also prove to be a useful predictor of outcome following liver resection for colorectal metastases.

Strategies for the treatment of synchronous liver metastasis

AIM

Observe the outcomes after complete simultaneous or delayed resection of synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

From 1994 to 2005, 119 patients were diagnosed with CRC and SLM; 57 patients had simultaneous resection (group I) and 62 patients had staged resection (group II). Perioperative chemotherapy was considered completed if all expected cycle were administrated.

RESULTS

Overall survival rates of group I-group II at 1, 3 and 5 years were respectively 91%-93% (p=0,3), 59%-57% (p=0,09) and 32%-25% (p=0,06). The median survival time of group I-group II were respectively 46 months-40 months (p=0,07). There was no statistical difference on survival regarding location of metastasis (p=0,09) or primary tumor location (p=0,2). Patients with simultaneous or staged resection receiving optimal treatment (R0 liver surgery and complete chemotherapy) were respectively 89% and 67% (p=0,04). Twenty three patients developed isolated liver recurrence with higher frequency in staged patients (26% vs 9% p=0,03) without impairment of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of postoperative morbidity and prolonged tiring treatment, many patients having staged resection were under treated. However we did not observe statistical difference on survival but we supported that simultaneous resection has to be prefer to achieve an optimal treatment. Lung and bone metastasis are the new challenge for oncologists.

Developing Strategies for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

Five-year survival rates of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer range from 30% to 40% for those who undergo successful resection procedures, and is almost nil among those unable to have surgery. However, improved chemotherapy strategies for nonoperable patients (specifically, the use of neoadjuvant oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens) have increased response rates and tumor downstaging such that 15% to 30% of initially nonoperable patients are able to have secondary, or rescue, surgery. Preliminary data also indicate that new targeted therapies should further increase response rates and thus resection rates. Operative techniques such as portal vein embolization and two-stage procedures for patients with multiple or large tumors, as well as use of cryosurgery and radiofrequency ablation, are also contributing to more effective removal of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. This brief report describes data supporting the expanding application of hepatectomy for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

The role and limitations of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan and computerized tomography (CT) in restaging patients with hepatic colorectal metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison with operative and pathological findings

BACKGROUND

Recent data confirmed the importance of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the selection of patients with colorectal hepatic metastases for surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before hepatic resection in selected cases may improve outcome. The influence of chemotherapy on the sensitivity of FDG-PET and CT in detecting liver metastases is not known.

METHODS

Patients were assigned to either neoadjuvant treatment or immediate hepatic resection according to resectability, risk of recurrence, extrahepatic disease, and patient preference. Two-thirds of them underwent FDG-PET/CT before chemotherapy; all underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and FDG-PET/CT. Those without extensive extrahepatic disease underwent open exploration and resection of all the metastases according to original imaging findings. Operative and pathological findings were compared to imaging results.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (33 lesions) underwent immediate hepatic resection (group 1), and 48 patients (122 lesions) received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 2). Sensitivity of FDG-PET and CT in detecting colorectal (CR) metastases was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (FDG-PET: 93.3 vs 49%, P<0.0001; CT: 87.5 vs 65.3, P=0.038). CT had a higher sensitivity than FDG-PET in detecting CR metastases following neoadjuvant therapy (65.3 vs 49%, P<0.0001). Sensitivity of FDG-PET, but not of CT, was lower in group 2 patients whose chemotherapy included bevacizumab compared to patients who did not receive bevacizumab (39 vs 59%, P=0.068).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT sensitivity is lowered by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CT is more sensitive than FDG-PET in detecting CR metastases following neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical decision-making requires information from multiple imaging modalities and pretreatment findings. Baseline FDG-PET and CT before neoadjuvant therapy are mandatory.

Major liver resections synchronous with colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical strategy in liver metastases synchronous to colorectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and short-term outcomes of major hepatectomies synchronous to colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Between January 1985 and December 2004, 79 patients underwent major hepatectomy for metastases synchronous to colorectal cancer; 31 underwent synchronous hepatectomy and colorectal surgery, and 48 underwent delayed liver resection.

RESULTS

The synchronous group had a higher rate of right colectomy (38.7% vs. 18.8%, P = .0499) and larger metastases (8 vs. 5.3 cm, P = .0032). Mortality (one patient in synchronous group), morbidity, and anastomotic leak rates were similar in the two groups. Colon-related morbidity did not cause adjunctive liver complications. Hospitalization in delayed hepatectomies was shorter (10.4 days vs. 13.9 days, P = .0021). Blood and plasma transfusions were higher in synchronous resections (41.9% vs. 16.7%, P = .0131 and 54.8% vs. 31.3%, P = .0370); no differences were found in the last 10 years. Considering both surgical procedures (colorectal + liver resection), in delayed hepatectomies, morbidity was higher (56.3% vs. 32.6%, P = .0369) and hospitalization was longer (20.5 vs. 13.9 days, P = .00001). Nine patients underwent major hepatectomy at the same time as anterior rectal resection with no mortality (morbidity 22.2%, mean hospitalization 12.4 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Major hepatectomies can be safely performed at the same time as colorectal surgery in selected patients with synchronous metastases with similar short-term results, even in the presence of rectal cancer.

Timing of resection of liver metastases synchronous to colorectal tumor: proposal of prognosis-based decisional model

BACKGROUND

Timing of hepatectomy for synchronous metastases of colorectal cancer is still debated. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze prognostic factors after synchronous and delayed liver resections to define selection criteria for choosing timing of hepatectomy.

METHODS

The study was performed on 127 patients with synchronous metastases undergoing radical hepatectomy. We divided patients according to the timing of hepatectomy: 70 synchronous (group A) and 57 delayed (group B).

RESULTS

Overall survival was similar between the two groups (5-year survival 30.8% vs. 32.0% A vs. B, P = .406). The multivariate analysis evidenced four independent prognostic factors in group A: male sex (P = .04), T4 (P = .0035), more than three metastases (P = .0001), and metastatic infiltration of nearby structures (P < .0001). There were no statistically significant prognostic factors in group B. Patients with more than three metastases had a significantly worse survival in group A than in group B (3-year survival, 15.0% vs. 34.3%, P = .007); similarly, borderline significant difference was encountered in patients with T4 primary tumor (3-year survival, 16.7% vs. 60%, P = .064)

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with liver metastases synchronous with colorectal cancer with T4 primary tumor, metastasis infiltration of neighboring structures, and especially with more than three metastases should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection.

Resection of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background/aims:

Hepatic resection in metastatic disease from colorectal cancer offers the best chance in selected cases for long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been advocated in some cases initially deemed irresectable, with few reports of the efficacy of such a strategy and the influence of the response to chemotherapy on the outcome of radical hepatic resection.

Methodology:

Between December 1995 and May 2005, 27 patients with colorectal liver metastases (seven males, 20 females, mean age: 58 ± 8 years; range: 40–75) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A seven-year survival analysis was performed. Chemotherapy included mainly 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and either oxaliplatin or irinotecan for a median of eight courses.

Results:

A total of 16 patients (59%) had synchronous and 11 (41%) metachronous metastases. During pre-operative chemotherapy, tumour regression occurred in ten cases (37%), stable disease in a further ten patients (37%) and progressive disease developed in seven cases (26%). The five-year overall survival for NACT responders was 64% and only 15% for non-responders (p=0.044).

Conclusions:

The response to chemotherapy is likely to be a significant prognostic factor affecting survival after liver resection for cure.

Outcome After Hepatectomy for Multiple (Four or More) Colorectal Metastases in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection is generally accepted as the only potential for long-term survival in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. Despite an unknown benefit, hepatic resection is playing an increasing role in patients with extensive disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary surgical database was carried out. Outcome after hepatectomy for four or more colorectal hepatic metastases was reviewed.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2002, out of a total of 584 patients, 98 (17%) with four or more colorectal hepatic metastases were resected. Actuarial 5-year survival was 33% for the entire group, with seven actual 5-year survivors. There were no perioperative deaths, and the perioperative morbidity was 28%. Positive margins and extrahepatic disease resection were independently associated with poor outcome. The median disease-free survival was 12 months, with no actuarial disease-free survivors at 5 years. Recurrence pattern, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence, and resection of recurrent disease were also associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival can be achieved after resection of multiple colorectal metastases; however, because most patients will experience recurrence of disease, effective adjuvant therapy and close follow-up is necessary.

Loco-regional recurrence from colon cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The survival after colon cancer surgery has not improved to the same extent as after rectal cancer treatment and studies on loco-regional recurrence after colon cancer surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the problem of loco-regional recurrence after potentially curative resections for colon cancer, regarding incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome.

METHODS

All 1,856 patients submitted to potentially curative surgery for colon cancer in the Stockholm/Gotland region in Sweden between 1996 and 2000 were followed until January 2005 or until death. Follow-up data were prospectively collected. Risk factors for loco-regional recurrences were analyzed, treatment and outcome for patients with recurrence was studied.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year incidence of loco-regional recurrence was 11.5%. Tumor locations in the right flexure and in the sigmoid colon, bowel perforation and emergent surgery were identified as independent risk factors for loco-regional recurrence. The risk also increased with increasing T- and N-stage. The median survival for all 192 patients with loco-regional recurrence was 9 months. Surgery was performed in 110 (57%) patients. In 23 (12%) patients a complete tumor clearance was achieved and the estimated 5-year survival in this group was 43%.

CONCLUSION

Loco-regional recurrence from colon cancer is a significant clinical problem. A multidisciplinary treatment approach, including preoperative staging, a complete resection of the recurrence and more effective adjuvant treatments may improve the outcome.

Second hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis: analysis of preoperative prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Second hepatectomy is a potentially curative treatment for patients with hepatic recurrence of colorectal cancer. However, there is still no consensus about the patient selection criteria for second hepatectomy under these circumstances, and the factors affecting prognosis after second hepatectomy remain uncertain.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data for 111 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastasis who underwent second hepatectomy at a single institution between 1985 and 2004, and for whom complete clinicopathologic reports were available, were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The morbidity and mortality rates were 14% and 0%, respectively, and the overall 5-year survival rate was 41%. Multivariate analysis revealed that synchronous resection for the first liver metastasis (hazard ratio, 1.8), more than three tumors at the second hepatectomy (1.9), and histopathological involvement of the hepatic vein and/or portal vein by the first liver metastasis (1.7) were independently associated with poor survival. We used these three risk factors to devise a preoperative model for predicting survival. The 5-year survival rates of patients without any risk factors, and with one, two, or three risk factors, were 62%, 38%, 19%, and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Second hepatectomy is beneficial for patients without any risk factors. Before second hepatectomy, chemotherapy should be considered for patients with any of these risk factors, especially with two or three factors, in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting to prolong survival. These results need to be confirmed and validated in another data set or future prospective trial according to the scoring scheme we outline.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for initially irresectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Hepatic surgery is the treatment of choice for resectable colorectal liver metastases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can downstage the tumour and enable surgery in up to 38 per cent of patients whose tumours were initially considered irresectable.

METHODS

This prospective study included 150 patients who underwent hepatic resection over a 4-year period. One hundred and sixteen patients had resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 1) and 34 had chemotherapy before liver surgery (group 2). Perioperative features, survival and pattern of recurrence were compared.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 35.1 months. The in-hospital mortality rate was zero. Three-year overall survival in the two groups was comparable (P = 0.232). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 21 per cent in the neoadjuvant group compared with 50.5 per cent in the immediate resection group (P < 0.001). Recurrence rates were 94 per cent (32 of 34) in group 1 and 66.4 per cent in group 2 (P = 0.001); extrahepatic recurrence, alone or associated with recurrence in the liver, was significantly more common in group 2 than in group 1 (78 versus 55 per cent; P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis revealed that resection of the recurrence was the most important independent prognostic factor for improved disease-free survival (relative risk 0.2; P < 0.001). Patients in group 2 had reduced disease-free survival (RR 1.8; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The recurrence rate among patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for initially irresectable liver metastases was extremely high. Re-resection should be attempted whenever feasible.

Portal triad clamping (TC) or hepatic vascular exclusion (VE) for major liver resection after prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy? A case-matched study in 60 patients

BACKGROUND

Prolonged systemic preoperative chemotherapy induces pathologic changes in liver parenchyma. The consequences of vascular occlusion on liver submitted to prolonged preoperative systemic chemotherapy are not known. The aim of this case-matched study was to assess which method of vascular occlusion is most appropriate for major liver resection in patients who have undergone prolonged preoperative systemic chemotherapy.

METHODS

Among 305 patients who had liver resection for colorectal metastases from 1998 to 2003, 28 underwent major liver resections under portal triad clamping after more than 6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (TC group). These 28 patients were compared with 32 patients matched for age, sex, ASA status, number of liver metastases, type of liver resection, and type of preoperative chemotherapy, but who had major liver resection under hepatic vascular exclusion after more than 6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (VE group).

RESULTS

There was no postoperative mortality. The morbidity rate was 18% after TC and 43% after VE (P = 0.044). Pulmonary complication rate was greater after VE (31% vs 3%, P = 0.017). The transfusion rate was 50% in the TC group and 40% in the VE group (P = 0.482). Postoperative changes of liver function tests were comparable in the two groups except for the prothrombin time, which was more prolonged from day 1 (P = 0.003) to day 5 (P = 0.04) after VE.

CONCLUSION

Vascular occlusion can be used with no mortality and acceptable morbidity for major liver resection after prolonged preoperative chemotherapy. TC should be preferred to VE, permitted by the location of the neoplasm.

Right portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy for unilobar colorectal liver metastases reduces the intrahepatic recurrence rate

AIM

To assess the effect of portal vein embolization (PVE) on intrahepatic recurrence rate after right hepatectomy for unilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND

Recent research suggests that CLM could spread retrogradely through the portal vein. PVE may reduce tumor shedding by the occlusion of distal portal branches. However, no study reported the clinical effect of PVE on intrahepatic recurrence after CLM resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2003, 44 patients requiring a right hepatectomy for unilobar CLM were operated in our institution. Right hepatectomy was performed after PVE in 23 patients (group A) and without PVE in 21 (group B). Surgical outcome and site of recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

The postoperative mortality was nil. Overall morbidity and transitory liver failure rates were similar in groups A and B (43.4% and 17.3% vs. 33.3% and 14.2%, respectively). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates did not differ in group A and B patients (61.2% and 43.7% vs. 49.7% and 35.5%, respectively; P = 0.862). The disease-free survival rate was similar in both groups. Thirty patients (68.2%) developed recurrences. Recurrences were intrahepatic in 22 patients (50%) and extrahepatic in 27 (61.3%). Intrahepatic recurrence rate was significantly lower in group A compared with group B (26.0% vs. 76.1% respectively; P < 0.001). PVE, number of CLM, and administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for intrahepatic recurrences.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that PVE reduces intrahepatic recurrence rate after right hepatectomy for unilobar CLM.

A prospective study of isolated human hepatocyte function following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: the effects of prior exposure to chemotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chemotherapy is increasingly used prior to resection of colorectal liver metastases, yet few studies have addressed its effect on the viability and function of hepatocytes. This study evaluated the effect of pre-operative chemotherapy on human hepatocytes.

METHODS

Studies were carried out on isolated hepatocytes from 47 patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. The function of drug metabolising enzymes in hepatocytes was assessed in vitro, as well as hepatocyte integrity and culture longevity. These results were compared between patients undergoing no pre-operative chemotherapy (N = 8), 5 fluorouracil (5FU) post-bowel resection (N = 20), and neo-adjuvant 5FU alone (N = 7) or in a combination with oxaliplatin (N = 12).

RESULTS

Average cell viability at isolation determined by trypan blue dye exclusion was 71% with no significant difference between the no chemotherapy or pre-resection chemotherapy groups. There was no significant difference in LDH leakage and cellular ATP content over a 96-h time course between the patient treatment groups. The function of cytochromes P450 (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4) and phase II enzymes (UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and sulphotransferase) was not adversely affected by pre-operative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-resection chemotherapy does not impair the function or culture integrity of hepatocytes isolated at the time of liver resection.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary

BACKGROUND

In many patients with advanced synchronous liver metastases from colorectal tumours, the metastases progress during treatment of the primary, precluding curative treatment. The authors have investigated a management strategy that involves high-impact chemotherapy first, resection of liver metastases second and finally removal of the primary tumour in patients with adverse prognostic factors.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with non-obstructive colonic (nine patients) or rectal (11 patients) cancer and advanced synchronous liver metastases were treated according to this strategy. Median age was 56 years. Patients received between two and six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years after the start of treatment were 85, 79, 71 and 56 per cent respectively, with a median survival of 46 months. Sixteen of the 20 patients had complete removal of liver metastases and colorectal tumours (resectability rate 80 per cent).

CONCLUSION

This new strategy produced resectability and survival rates better than those expected from the published data on patients with disease of similar severity. It allows initial control and downstaging of liver metastases, and delivery of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer without the fear that liver metastases will meanwhile progress beyond the possibility of cure.

Neoadjuvant treatment of unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant treatment for downstaging and downsizing disease in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer with a view to potentially curative surgery. This has been increasingly feasible with the more active treatment combinations presently available based on oxaliplatin or irinotecan. This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of this treatment strategy and discusses the implications of advances in treatment in other metastatic disease settings for these patients and the issues of patient selection and prognostic factors.

Perioperative complications after hepatectomy with or without intra-arterial chemotherapy for bilobar colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

We investigated perioperative complications of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy preceding major hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal cancer metastases. No consensus exists concerning operative feasibility or perioperative course in patients undergoing major liver resection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy--partly because such chemotherapy is considered hepatotoxic, increasing the risk of postoperative liver failure.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data were available for 41 consecutive patients with 5 or more bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent major liver resection with or without prior hepatic arterial chemotherapy. Data concerning operative feasibility, postoperative liver function, complication rates, and histologic findings in the non-neoplastic liver were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Prehepatectomy and postoperative day 1 platelet counts were lower (P < .01 and P < .05), alkaline phosphatase on postoperative day 3 was higher (P < .01), and prothrombin time on day 1 was more prolonged (P < .01) in the chemotherapy group. No significant difference was seen between groups in intraoperative data, morbidity, or duration of hospitalization. Histologic examination of adjacent non-neoplastic liver confirmed mild to severe fatty degeneration in 91% of the patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared with 53% in those without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .023). Although the number of neoplasms in chemotherapy patients was greater than that of the other group, overall and disease-free survival rates were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite mild postoperative liver dysfunction, pre-resection hepatic arterial chemotherapy did not increase morbidity.

The treatment of hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer death in the United States, with 135,000 new cases and 55,000 deaths annually. Ultimately, two-thirds (99,000) of all patients with colorectal cancer will develop metastasis to the liver and other organs in their life span, making metastatic colorectal cancer the second leading cause of cancer-related death in North America. The optimal management of these patients has become increasingly complex with the myriad of treatment options that are available. Because the timing of any therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, or others) has become integral to the success of the treatment, a collaborative approach involving multiple specialties is needed for the best patient outcome. Defined clinical and pathologic determinants of outcome have been demonstrated to effect the overall and disease-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Understanding of these determinants remains essential to any treating physician and has lead to significant paradigm shifts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases is associated with favourable long-term survival

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (RCLM) remains controversial. This study aimed to determine whether repeat liver resection for RCLM could be performed with acceptable morbidity, mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

Of 1121 consecutive liver resections performed and prospectively analysed between 1987 and 2005, 852 'curative' resections were performed on patients with colorectal liver metastases. Single liver resection was performed in 718 patients, and 71 repeat hepatic resections for RCLM were performed in 66 patients.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative deaths following repeat hepatic resection compared with a postoperative mortality rate of 1.4 per cent after single hepatic resection. Postoperative morbidity was comparable following single and repeat hepatectomy (26.1 versus 18 per cent; P = 0.172), although median blood loss was greater during repeat resection (450 versus 350 ml; P = 0.006). Actuarial 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 94, 68 and 44 per cent after repeat hepatic resection for RCLM, compared with 89.3, 51.7 and 29.5 per cent respectively following single hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

The beneficial outcomes observed after repeat liver resection in selected patients with RCLM confirm the experience of others and support its status as the preferred choice of treatment for such patients.

Repeat resection of liver metastases

Can be effective

Survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: a 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer death in North America. Hepatic resection offers the potential for cure in selected patients. We report the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases over a 10-year period at a single hepatobiliary surgical oncology center.

METHODS

All patients who underwent liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1992 and 2002 were identified. Data were retrospectively obtained through chart review. Major outcome variables were disease-free survival and overall survival. Risk factors for disease recurrence and mortality were identified by multivariate analysis by using the Cox proportional hazard method.

RESULTS

A total of 423 hepatectomies were performed for metastatic colorectal cancer. Most operations (n = 276; 65%) were major (four or more segments) hepatectomies. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 74 (17%) patients. There were seven (1.6%) perioperative deaths. The disease-free survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 64%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. The overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 93%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified four negative predictive factors for overall survival (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval): a positive surgical margin (2.9; 1.5-5.3), large metastases (>5 cm; 1.5; 1.1-2.0), multiple metastases (1.4; 1.1-1.9), and age >60 years (1.4; 1.1-1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer is safe and provides good long-term overall survival rates of 47% at 5 years and 28% at 10 years. An aggressive approach is justified by the low operative mortality rate and good long-term survival, even in individuals with multiple bilobar metastases.

Strategies to treat primary unresectable colorectal liver metastases

The liver is the most common site of metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), and hepatic metastases are responsible for fatalities in at least two thirds of patients with colorectal malignancy. However, the only available treatment associated with long-term survival in patients with CRC metastases is liver resection. While recent studies have shown that liver resection achieves a 5-year overall survival from 37% to 58%, only 10% to 20% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are eligible for resection. Pharmacologic developments and conceptual advances in chemotherapy, regional treatment, and aggressive surgical strategies have ultimately changed the current treatment of patients with primary unresectable liver metastases caused by CRC. Patients who were treated by only palliative chemotherapy a few years ago presently have a variety of strategies available to render their disease surgically resectable with the potential for long-term survival. These advances are the result of a strong collaboration between medical oncologists and surgeons. The development of new chemotherapy protocols that offer the potential for curative surgery with optimum timing within the natural history of this metastatic disease is a shared therapeutic challenge.

Debunking dogma: surgery for four or more colorectal liver metastases is justified

Treatment of four or more colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is controversial and remains a relative contraindication to surgery at some institutions. We sought to assess the outcome of patients with four or more CRLMs treated with surgery. Patients (159) with four or more CRLMs were treated surgically at a single institution. The median number of treated lesions was 5 (range, 4-14). The majority of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (89.9%). Forty-six (29.0%) patients underwent resection only, 12 (7.5%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) only, and 101 (63.5%) underwent resection plus RFA. The 5-year actuarial disease-free and overall survival rates were 21.5% and 50.9%, respectively. Patients who underwent RFA as part of their surgical procedure (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.81, P = 0.03) and those with a positive surgical resection margin (HR = 1.52, P = 0.01) were more likely to have a shorter time to recurrence. Patients who did not have a reduction in tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a higher likelihood of death following surgical treatment (HR = 2.53, P = 0.01). Patients with four or more CRLMs should be considered for aggressive surgical treatment, including liver resection with or without RFA, in order to improve the chance of long-term survival. Certain clinicopathologic factors, including lack of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were associated with a worse prognosis.

Treatment for multiple bilobar liver metastases of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent advances have extended indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Staging systems based on the biological malignancy of primary and metastatic tumors provide appropriate indications for hepatectomy in CLM. However, suitability for resection in patients with complex and extensive hepatic metastases is controversial.

METHODS

A medline search was performed to identify papers reporting the resection for CLM. Techniques, indication, and results were reviewed.

RESULTS

If the anticipated remnant liver volume is small (25-40% of total), suggesting a high risk of postoperative liver failure, portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended prior to hepatectomy. However, curative resections are not always possible. Specifically in synchronous multiple bilobar CLM, two-stage hepatectomy, comprising bilateral hepatectomy and primary resection with or without PVE, can prevent growth of ipsilateral metastatic nodules in the remnant liver and reduce surgical risk. Several local ablation techniques can complement surgery if hepatic resection alone increases the risk of postoperative liver failure or is not curative. Chemotherapy combined with targeted treatment can suppress recurrence and extend indications for hepatectomy by reducing the size and number of primary irresectable tumors.

CONCLUSION

PVE or staged procedure combining with local ablation or neoadjuvant, downstaging or adjuvant therapies extends indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar CLM. The 5-year survival rate for multiple bilobar CLM treated with alternating hepatectomy and chemotherapy is comparable to the values reported for single and hemilateral CLM.