Treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable liver metastases

Predictors of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival after palliative resection in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on predictors of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify independent predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity as well as independent predictors of long-term survival.

DESIGN

This study was planned as a retrospective single-institution review.

SETTING

This study took place at the Department of Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia, between 1984 and 2004.

PARTICIPANTS

Prospectively collected data were extracted from the records of 1867 patients undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer. The outcomes for 379 patients undergoing surgical resection of their primary colon or rectal tumor in the presence of unresectable synchronous metastases were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Independent predictive factors for postoperative mortality and morbidity as well as long-term survival were assessed by use of logistic regression and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (9.2%) patients died in the postoperative period and morbidity was 48.3%. Median survival was 11 months. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was independently associated with medical complications (P < .001), emergency operations (P = .001), female sex (P = .002), and age (≥ 70; P = .007) on regression analysis. Elderly (≥ 70) patients with either advanced local disease or extrahepatic metastases were at a particularly high risk. Preoperative predictors of surgical morbidity included male sex (P = .028) and advanced local disease (P = .036). Preoperative predictors of medical complications included repeat operations (P < .001), elevated urea levels (P = .017), and emergency operations (P = .003). Independent factors associated with poor overall survival included medical complications (P < .001), nodal stage (N2) (P = .004), poor tumor differentiation (P = .006), and apical lymph node involvement (P = .042). A subgroup of patients with advanced nodal disease (N2) and a poor tumor differentiation had a significantly poorer prognosis.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with advanced local disease or extrahepatic metastases are at high risk of 30-day postoperative mortality. Significant nodal disease and poor tumor differentiation are important predictors of long-term survival.

Management of stage IV rectal cancer: Palliative options

Approximately 30% of patients with rectal cancer present with metastatic disease. Many of these patients have symptoms of bleeding or obstruction. Several treatment options are available to deal with the various complications that may afflict these patients. Endorectal stenting, laser ablation, and operative resection are a few of the options available to the patient with a malignant large bowel obstruction. A thorough understanding of treatment options will ensure the patient is offered the most effective therapy with the least amount of associated morbidity. In this review, we describe various options for palliation of symptoms in patients with metastatic rectal cancer. Additionally, we briefly discuss treatment for asymptomatic patients with metastatic disease.

Elective palliative resection of incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: who really benefits from it?

PURPOSE

Despite the encouraging results of chemotherapy in patients affected by incurable colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical resection of a primitive tumor is still a common approach worldwide. The identification of prognostic factors related to short survival (<6 months) may allow excluding from resective surgery those who may not benefit from it.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 15 variables in a population of 71 patients undergoing nonemergency palliative primary resections of incurable CRC, including patients' demographics and clinical/histopathological characteristics of the tumor.

RESULTS

No variables were related to perioperative mortality (8.5% overall). A multivariate analysis revealed that older age (≥80 years) and metastasis to more than 25% of the lymph nodes were associated with survival (4 and 6 months, respectively). Mucoid adenocarcinoma therefore tends to be associated with the prognosis (P = 0.070).

CONCLUSIONS

An elderly age tends to be a contraindication to an elective primary tumor resection in patients affected by incurable CRC. Massive lymph node involvement and mucoid adenocarcinoma should also be considered before planning major colonic surgery.

Nonresectional palliative abdominal surgery for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Nonresectional palliative abdominal surgery (e.g. defunctioning stoma/bypass) may be appropriate for patients unsuitable for curative resection, to deal with complications of advanced colorectal malignancy such as obstruction. Our aim was to review the outcome of surgery in these patients within our institution.

METHOD

All patients undergoing palliative surgery without resection for colorectal carcinoma between July 1998 and January 2007 were identified from our prospectively compiled colorectal cancer database. Data were extracted related to patients' demographics, presentation, tumour site, operative intervention, complications, oncological therapies, length of hospital stay and postoperative survival.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-three patients were identified with a median age of 79 years (31-94 years). Fifty per cent were operated on an emergent basis for obstruction or perforation, and 50% on an elective basis. One hundred and sixty-nine patients had defunctioning stomas formed of which 156 were loop stomas. Twenty-four patients underwent bypass procedures. Thirty-day mortality rate was 13.5% and postoperative morbidity rate 47%. Median survival was 247 days, with 1-year survival of 38%. Patients undergoing operation on an emergent basis had poorer long-term survival (127 vs 320 days, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Nonresectional palliative abdominal surgery is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality, particularly when performed in the emergency setting. However, in this patient group with a very poor outlook, it may be offered with reasonable survival expectations.

Impact of resection for primary colorectal cancer on outcomes in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of resection for primary colorectal cancer on oncologic outcomes in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 91 consecutive patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases who underwent resection of the primary colorectal cancer between December 1999 and December 2007. Of the 91 patients, 54 (59.3%) also underwent complete (R0) resection for liver metastases, and 84 (92.3%) received postoperative chemotherapy. The oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 1.1%, and morbidity was 37.4%. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 44.5% and 26.8%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that residual disease after surgery (non-R0 resection; p = 0.003), lymph node metastasis of the primary tumor (p = 0.015), and no postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival. Independent predictors of an inability to achieve a complete resection were the presence of three or more liver metastases and the presence of extrahepatic disease at exploration. Significant differences in survival existed among the three risk stratification groups (no-, low-, and high-risk groups; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The inability to safely render the liver and colon microscopically free of disease should cause a surgeon to reconsider synchronous colectomy and hepatectomy. A multidisciplinary approach that combines both complete resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases and postoperative chemotherapy may achieve improved survival in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Intestinal complications after palliative treatment for asymptomatic patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The initial surgical management of asymptomatic patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversy. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of major intestinal complications in asymptomatic patients who received palliative treatment for unresectable stage IV CRC, according to the type of treatment.

METHODS

Between March 2001 and January 2008, we retrospectively analyzed 227 asymptomatic patients who underwent first-line resection of the primary tumor followed by chemotherapy (144 patients, resection group) or those who underwent first-line chemotherapy (83 patients, chemotherapy group).

RESULTS

In the resection group, the incidences of intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, fistula, and intestinal hemorrhage were 14.6%, 0%, 0.7%, and 4.8%, respectively. In the chemotherapy group, these incidences were 15.2%, 1.2%, 0%, and 3.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of intestinal complications. In multivariate analysis of overall survival, treatment type (resection group vs. chemotherapy group) was not a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.076).

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic patients with unresectable stage IV CRC, first-line chemotherapy may be considered safe, with no increased risk of major intestinal complications compared with primary tumor resection plus chemotherapy.

Metastasectomy for stage IV colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer traditionally has been considered incurable. Over the past 3 decades, however, resection of low-volume hepatic disease has been recognized as beneficial in some cases. More recently, resection of isolated pulmonary metastases has been shown to offer long-term survival in carefully selected patients. Resection of metastases to more unusual sites (ovary, brain, peritoneal cavity) is more controversial; nevertheless, retrospective data suggest that a few patients may be cured with resection of these tumors. In this article, we review the history and current status of metastasectomy in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Meta-analysis of survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer managed with surgical resection versus chemotherapy alone

BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the appropriate management of asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and irresectable metastases. METHODS A literature search was conducted on Medline and Embase. Outcome measures included: survival; postoperative morbidity and mortality; complications from the primary tumor and the need for surgery to manage complications; the likelihood of curative surgery after initial response to primary therapy; and length of hospital stay. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. RESULTS Eight retrospective studies, including 1,062 patients, met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Meta-analysis has shown an improvement in the survival of patients managed with palliative resection of their primary tumor, with an estimated standardized median difference of 6.0 months (standardized difference, 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29, 0.82; p < 0.001). Patients managed with chemotherapy alone were 7.3 times more likely to have a complication from the primary tumor (95% CI, 1.7, 34.4; p = 0.008). There was no difference in the response rates to chemotherapy, making metastatic disease amendable to curative resection (0.85; 95% CI 0.40, 1.8; p = 0.662). CONCLUSIONS To date, only retrospective data are available, showing that palliative resection of the primary tumor in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with stage IV colorectal cancer is associated with longer survival. Resection of the primary tumor reduces the likelihood of complications from the primary tumor and avoids the need for emergency procedures.

Surgical strategies for synchronous colorectal liver metastases in 156 consecutive patients: classic, combined or reverse strategy?

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are candidates for resection. The optimal treatment sequence in these patients has not been defined.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on 156 consecutive patients with synchronous resectable CLM and intact primary were reviewed. Surgical strategies were defined as combined (combined resection of primary and liver), classic (primary before liver), and reverse (liver before primary) after preoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-two patients (83%) had resection of all disease. Seventy-two patients underwent classic, 43 combined, and 27 reverse strategies. Median numbers of CLMs per patient were 1 in the combined, 3 in the classic, and 4 in the reverse strategy group (p = 0.01 classic vs reverse; p < 0.001 reverse vs combined). Postoperative mortality rates in the combined, classic, and reverse strategies were 5%, 3%, and 0%, respectively (p = NS), and postoperative cumulative morbidity rates were 47%, 51%, and 31%, respectively (p = NS). Three-year and 5-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 65% and 55% in the combined, 58% and 48% in the classic, and 79% and 39% in the reverse strategy (NS). On multivariate analysis, liver tumor size >3 cm (hazard ratio [HR] 2.72, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.88) and cumulative postoperative morbidity (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.19) were independently associated with overall survival after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The classic, combined, or reverse surgical strategies in patients with synchronous presentation of CLM are associated with similar outcomes. The reverse strategy can be considered as an alternative option in patients with advanced CLM and an asymptomatic primary.

Ten years experience of managing the primary tumours in patients with stage IV colorectal cancers

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer have metastases at the time of presentation. Such patients are often offered systemic chemotherapy but debate continues as to whether these patients benefit from resection of the primary tumour. We describe our ten years experience of managing the primary tumours in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the overall survival of patients undergoing surgery in these circumstances and to determine whether any prognostic indicators could be identified.

PATIENTS & METHODS

920 consecutive patients presenting with stage IV colorectal cancer disease were identified from the Leicester Colorectal Cancer database. Patients undergoing resection of the primary tumour (Resection Group) with the residual metastatic disease were compared to those patients who had not their primary tumour excised (Non-Resection Group). Various different variables in two groups were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survivals. Univariate analysis was performed for each group to elicit the significant prognostic factors whereas Cox regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of overall survival.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of two groups showed prolonged survival for Resection Group compared to the Non-Resection Group (median; 14.5 Vs 5.83 months, p = <0.005). The multivariate analysis of different survival predicting variables, revealed the resection of the primary tumour as an independent predictor of overall survival (p < 0.001). The univariate analysis of resection group identified age at presentation, tumour site, tumour stage (pT), lymph nodal stage (pN), complete histological resection, tumour fixity, ASA grade, mode of surgery, post-operative chemotherapy and sites of metastasis as significant factors (p < 0.05) for survival prediction. When these factors were used in Cox-Regression model, only the age at presentation (p = 0.001), tumour fixity (p = 0.012) and lymph nodal involvement (p = 0.042) were independent predictors for overall survival. Treatment with post-operative chemotherapy and a smaller volume of liver metastases were associated with prolonged survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of primary tumour for stage IV colorectal cancers is associated with prolonged survival for selected patients. Age at presentation, extent of liver involvement, tumour fixity and ASA grade can help to decide the patients who will benefit from surgery.

Primary tumor resection in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of a provincial population-based cohort

PURPOSE

We conducted a Canadian population-based study to assess surgical practice patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) at diagnosis.

METHODS

We reviewed a provincial cancer registry for 2 years. Four hundred eleven patients presenting with mCRC were stratified by primary tumor resection status. Baseline characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of patients underwent resection. Resected patients were less likely to have rectal primaries (16% vs. 42%, P < or = 0.001) and had more obstructive symptoms (47% vs. 31%, P < or = 0.001) or bleeding (26% vs. 6%, P < or = 0.001). They experienced fewer tumor-related complications (4% vs. 22%, P < or = 0.001). Use of first-line chemotherapy was similar (61% vs. 58%, P = 0.54), but the resection cohort was more likely to receive doublet chemotherapy (57% vs. 36%, P < or = 0.01) and metastatectomy (10% vs. 0%, P < or = 0.0001). Among patients with rectal tumors, radiation use was comparable (63% vs. 58%, P = 0.68). Median survival was longer in the resection group (14 vs. 6 months, P < or = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients presenting with mCRC underwent primary resection. Colonic tumors, obstruction, and bleeding were associated with resection. In situ primaries conferred more complications, despite similar use of radiation in cases of rectal cancer. Unresected patients were less likely to receive doublet chemotherapy or metastatectomy, and had inferior survival.

Primary chemotherapy with or without colonic stent for management of irresectable stage IV colorectal cancer

AIM

Management of patients with irresectable stage IV colorectal cancer is controversial. Since 2000, we have favoured primary chemotherapy with stent insertion in case of obstructive tumor. Our aim was to report the results of this strategy in an unselected consecutive series of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2007, 68 of 115 consecutive patients admitted with stage IV colorectal cancer were considered irresectable. Data were collected prospectively. Feasibility and outcomes were analysed in an intention to treat basis.

RESULTS

Of 68 patients, 37 received the intended primary chemotherapy, with stent insertion in 19, 13 required surgery as initial management and 18 patients received supportive care only. Twelve patients in the primary chemotherapy group developed local complication, including bowel obstruction in 9, successfully managed by stent in 6 of them. In patients requiring surgery at presentation, mortality and morbidity were 31% and 77%, respectively. Overall, 41 patients received chemotherapy, of whom, 6 were downstaged to undergo curative resection. Median survival was 6.7 and 15.4 months for the whole series and patients treated by primary chemotherapy, respectively (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age, CEA level, primary chemotherapy and secondary curative resection were independently associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

In unselected patients with irresectable stage IV colorectal cancer, primary chemotherapy with or without stent is feasible in more than 50% of cases and is associated with a low rate of secondary surgery for complicated primary tumor. This strategy may represent the best palliation in these patients for both duration and quality of survival.

Determinants of morbidity and survival after elective non-curative resection of stage IV colon and rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The benefit of elective primary tumor resection for non-curable stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) remains largely undefined. We wanted to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and short survival.

METHODS

Using a prospective database, we analyzed potential risk factors in 233 patients, who were electively operated for non-curable stage IV CRC between 1996 and 2002. Patients with recurrent tumors, resectable metastases, emergency operations, and non-resective surgery were excluded. Risk factors for increased postoperative morbidity and limited postoperative survival were identified by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with colon cancer (CC = 156) and rectal cancer (RC = 77) were comparable with regard to age, sex, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, carcinoembryonic antigen levels, hepatic spread, tumor grade, resection margins, 30-day mortality (CC 5.1%, RC 3.9%) and postoperative chemotherapy. pT4 tumors, carcinomatosis, and non-anatomical resections were more common in colon cancer patients, whereas enterostomies (CC 1.3%, RC 67.5%, p < 0.0001), anastomotic leaks (CC 7.7%, RC 24.2%, p = 0.002), and total surgical complications (CC 19.9%, RC 40.3%, p = 0.001) were more frequent after rectal surgery. Independent determinants of an increased postoperative morbidity were primary rectal cancer, hepatic tumor load >50%, and comorbidity >1 organ. Prognostic factors for limited postoperative survival were hepatic tumor load >50%, pT4 tumors, lymphatic spread, R1-2 resection, and lack of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative resection is associated with a particularly unfavorable outcome in rectal cancer patients presenting with a locally advanced tumor (pT4, expected R2 resection) or an extensive comorbidity, and in all CRC patients who show a hepatic tumor load >50%. For such patients, surgery might be contraindicated unless the tumor is immediately life-threatening.

Treatment for colorectal liver metastases: a review

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, the emergence of surgical adjuncts such as portal vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy, and ablative therapies not only decreases mortality and morbidity after an extended hepatectomy but also broadens the indication for surgical treatment of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Combination chemotherapeutic regimens, namely 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with irinotecan or oxaliplatin, and targeted monochromal antibodies can downsize the tumor burden to the extent that formerly unresectable metastases can sometimes be excised.

DISCUSSION

The 5-year survival rate following liver resection ranges between 25% and 58%. During the 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with irinotecan treatment period, the patients who were deemed to be resectable should be considered as surgical candidates regardless of the associated adverse predictive factors. The emergence of epidermal growth factor receptor antibody agents, which act effectively in patients with Kras wild-type tumor, fosters treatment individualization.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of the perioperative chemotherapy on survival benefit for resectable liver metastases has not been justified. However, the timing and indication of surgical treatment paradigm in colorectal liver metastasis, including for synchronous disease and extrahepatic disease, are dramatically changing with the development of chemotherapeutic agents.

Response of the primary tumor in symptomatic and asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer to combined interventional endoscopy and palliative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The treatment of the primary tumor in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a matter of discussion. Little attention has thus far been paid to the endoscopically observable changes of the primary in non-curatively resectable stage IV disease.

METHODS

20 patients [14 men, 6 women, median age 67 (39-82) years] were observed after initial diagnosis of non-curatively resectable metastasized symptomatic (83%) or asymptomatic (17%) CRC, from June 2002 to April 2009. If necessary, endoscopic tumor debulking was performed. 5-FU based chemotherapy was given immediately thereafter. In 10 patients, chemotherapy was combined with antibody therapy.

RESULTS

Response of the primary was observed in all patients. Local symptoms were treated endoscopically whenever necessary (obstruction or bleeding), and further improved after chemotherapy was started: Four patients showed initial complete endoscopic disappearance of the primary. In an additional 6 patients, only adenomatous tissue was histologically detected. In both these groups, two patients revealed local tumor relapse after interruption of therapy. Local tumor regression or stable disease was achieved in the remaining 10 patients. 15 patients died during the observation time. In 13 cases, death was related to metastatic disease progression. The mean overall survival time was 19.6 (3-71) months. No complications due to the primary were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that modern anti-cancer drugs combined with endoscopic therapy are an effective and safe treatment of the symptomatic primary and ameliorate local complaints without the need for surgical intervention in advanced UICC stage IV CRC.

Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: is it time to reconsider traditional paradigms of management?

BACKGROUND

Patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are typically treated with initial colorectal resection followed by arbitrary and prolonged courses of chemotherapy. Partial hepatectomy is considered only for patients without interval disease progression. This review describes the rationale for this treatment approach and the recent developments suggesting that this management paradigm should be reconsidered.

RESULTS

Because asymptomatic colorectal cancer often does not lead to complications, and given the potential benefit of chemotherapy in downsizing unresectable to resectable liver disease, most patients with asymptomatic primary tumors and unresectable synchronous CLM should be first treated with chemotherapy. In contrast, initial hepatic resection should be considered for resectable synchronous CLM. Survival benefits from prehepatectomy chemotherapy have not been established. Several reports demonstrate morbidity after hepatic resection from extended durations of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-based prehepatectomy chemotherapy. Although shorter treatment periods may not have these deleterious effects on subsequent hepatic resection, prospective studies reveal that most patients with supposedly aggressive disease with short treatment durations will not be identified. Moreover, a complete radiologic response to prehepatectomy chemotherapy is not only rare but also does not equate with a complete pathological response. Finally, several studies suggest that simultaneous colorectal and minor hepatic resections can performed safely with benefits in total morbidity when compared with traditional staged procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional treatment paradigm centering on the utility of prehepatectomy chemotherapy for resectable synchronous CLM should be reconsidered. Recent developments underscore the need for prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the optimal timing of hepatectomy relative to chemotherapy.

Colonoscopic findings and tumor site do not predict bowel obstruction during medical treatment of stage IV colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

In the absence of symptoms related to their primary tumor, patients with stage IV colorectal cancer can undergo medical treatment with their primary tumor in situ. In these patients, bowel obstruction is the most common primary tumor-related complication. We hypothesized that left-sided, circumferential, near-obstructing lesions and/or inability to advance the colonoscope beyond the primary tumor are associated with symptomatic bowel obstruction and are indications for prophylactic primary tumor resection (PTR) or colonic diversion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical oncology database of the University of Wisconsin Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were presentation with stage IV colorectal cancer without previous treatment. Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare continuous and noncontinuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. None underwent colonic diversion or stenting during the course of their disease. At presentation, nine patients underwent PTR for obstructive symptoms. Forty percent of patients with high-risk colonoscopic lesions required PTR at presentation, compared with 3% of patients without high-risk findings. No patients with high-risk colonoscopic findings and/or left-sided lesions who did not undergo PTR at presentation developed symptoms of obstruction during medical therapy.

CONCLUSION

In stage IV colorectal cancer, circumferential, near-obstructing lesions and inability to advance the colonoscope beyond the primary tumor are common colonoscopic findings and are associated with obstructive symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Left-sided lesions and/or high-risk colonoscopic findings do not predict bowel obstruction during medical treatment and should not be indications for prophylactic PTR or colonic diversion in asymptomatic patients.

Local treatment for recurrent colorectal hepatic metastases after partial hepatectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to identify patients who may benefit from local treatment in recurrent colorectal liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 51 consecutive patients were treated for hepatic recurrence(s) after an initial partial hepatic resection. Surgery was considered as the primary treatment option for eligible patients. Patients with a small liver remnant after major hepatectomy were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SRx). SRx was given as an outpatient, emerging local treatment option for patients with intra-hepatic recurrences not eligible for surgery or RFA. Partial liver resection was performed in 36 patients (70%), RFA in ten patients (20%), and SRx in five patients (10%).

RESULTS

Median hospital stay was 7 (range, 3-62) days with a morbidity of 16% without in-hospital death. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in recurrence or survival between the three treatment modalities. Overall 5-year survival was 35% with an estimated median survival of 37 months. Patients with a disease-free interval between first hepatectomy and hepatic recurrence less than 6 months did not survive 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection, RFA, and SRx can be performed safely in patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases and offer a survival that seems comparable to primary liver resections of colorectal liver metastases.

Current management of colorectal hepatic metastasis

In the USA, cancers of the colon and rectum are the third most common site of new cancer cases and cancer deaths. With improved screening and adjuvant therapy, the survival of patients has increased substantially over the last decade. However, patients with metastatic disease often have limited survival. Hepatic metastasis is one of the most frequent sites of metastatic disease. In fact, 35-55% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop hepatic metastasis at some time during the course of their disease. Patients who are able to undergo complete resection of their hepatic metastases have the best chance of long-term survival. The goal of hepatic resection is to achieve complete resection of all metastases with microscopically negative surgical margins while preserving sufficient hepatic parenchyma. Survival following hepatic resection of colorectal metastasis now approaches 35-50%. However, approximately 65% of patients will have a recurrence at 5 years. Increasingly chemotherapeutic agents are being offered in the preoperative setting prior to operation. At the time of operation, patients with extensive hepatic disease can sometimes be offered ablative therapies combined with resection or staged approaches. Modern management of hepatic colorectal metastases necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to effectively treat these patients and increase the number of patients who will benefit from resection.

Outcomes of resection and non-resection strategies in management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with surgically incurable bowel cancer at presentation is controversial. The aims of treatment are to optimise quality of life and prolong survival. It has been believed that the most effective palliation is achieved by resection of the primary cancer in order to pre-empt future complications. This study reviews and compares the outcomes of patients with incurable bowel cancer managed by resection and non-resection strategies over a 7-year period in a single District General Hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with surgically incurable bowel cancer at presentation were identified from the prospectively collected local ACPGBI database. Survival, using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, was compared between patients managed by resection of the primary, non-resectional intervention (surgery, stent & oncological treatments) and those managed with supportive care only. The primary endpoint of the study was survival on an intention to treat basis, compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 646 consecutive newly diagnosed bowel cancer patients over a 7 year period 154 cases (24%) were deemed surgically incurable at presentation. Of these surgical resection was carried out in 45 patients (29%), non-resectional intervention was followed in 52 patients (34%) and supportive treatment alone in 57 patients (37%). Median survival of each group was as follows: resected patients 11 months (I.Q range 3-18 months), non-resectional intervention 7 months (I.Q range 2-15 months) and supportive care alone 2 months (I.Q range 1-8 months). Only one patient (2%) managed by non-resectional intervention required later surgery to treat primary tumour related complications. Survival was not significantly different between resection and non-resection treatments. The overall operative mortality for the resection group was 16% (7/45 cases), with an elective mortality of 14% (4/28 cases) and emergency mortality 18% (3/17 cases).

CONCLUSION

In an unselected bowel cancer population surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients presenting with incurable disease does not improve survival and is associated with a high risk of post-operative mortality.

The "liver-first approach" for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the outcome of "the liver-first" approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases were primarily treated for their liver metastases. If successful, patients underwent treatment for the rectal tumor.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included. One patient had liver resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. All remaining 22 patients underwent laparotomy after chemotherapy. Eighteen patients underwent partial liver resection and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for the rectal cancer. One patient underwent in one session a partial liver resection and a low anterior resection. Six patients were not treated according to protocol because of extensive disease. Sixteen patients (73 percent) completed the full treatment protocol and all are alive after a median period of 19 (range, 7-56) months.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first sizable report on the "liver-first approach" demonstrating that it may be considered the preferred treatment schedule for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. It allows most patients to undergo curative resections of both metastatic and primary disease and can avoid useless rectal surgery in patients with incurable metastatic disease.

Prognosis analysis and treatment strategy for patients with Dukes D stage rectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the metastasis distribution, prognosis and treatment strategy for patients with Dukes D stage rectal cancer.

METHODS: Clinical data, type distribution and prognosis of 301 cases with Dukes D stage rectal cancer who underwent surgery from May 1991 to August 2003 were retrospectively analyzed using Log-rank and Kapla-Meier test.

RESULTS: The patients with Dukes D stage were associated with a mean OS (overall survival) of 32.50 ± 3.22 months, and OS rate were 64.61% (1 year), 26.40% (3 years) and 15.15% (5 years), respectively. The prognosis was related to factors such as gross type, tumor differentiation, T stage and surgery type. 32.56% patients underwent side-side anastomosis and no primary-cancer-directed surgery, and 67.44% patients underwent primary-cancer-directed surgery. Patients had significantly benefited from palliative resection in terms of overall survival (P = 0.0158). The patients with Dukes D stage were 10.29% with peritoneal carcinomatosis, 32.55% with local infiltration, 40.53% with distant metastasis, and 16.61% with complex metastasis. The prognosis among metastasis type was not significantly different (P = 0.4122). Patients with synchronous liver metastases accounted for 51.4% of all cases, and 84.23% for distant metastasis, which had a mean OS of 32.50 ± 3.22 months and had relatively longer life expectancy.

CONCLUSION: Patients of Dukes D stage rectal cancer show no significant difference regardless of metastasis type, and primary-cancer-directed surgery should be actively performed and the postoperative OS rate and quality of life can be improved.

Chemotherapy has also an effect on primary tumor in colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study characterizes the histological effect of chemotherapy (CT) on primary colonic tumors.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2006, 38 patients with stage IV colon cancer underwent resection of the primary, after chemotherapy (CT group, n = 16) or without preoperative CT (control group, n = 22). For all primary tumors, histological analysis included: fibrosis, acellular necrosis, acellular mucin pools, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, and changes at tumor surface. Tumor regression grade (TRG) was determined by the amount of residual tumor cells and was graded from 1 to 5.

RESULTS

No patient had complete histological response. Major histological tumor regression (TRG2) was observed in 70% of patients treated by CT and none of the not treated patients (P < 0.0001). Fibrosis, acellular necrosis, and surface changes were significantly increased in the CT group. TRG in the primary was comparable to the TRG in the corresponding liver metastases for 7/9 patients who underwent both colonic and hepatic resection after CT.

CONCLUSION

CT induces major histological response in 70% of colon cancers. Response to CT in the primary and the corresponding liver metastases are correlated. These results support a policy of initial CT management for stage IV colon cancer and may warrant future studies of neoadjuvant CT in locally advanced colon carcinomas.

Management of patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable metastases

BACKGROUND

In patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer with irresectable metastatic disease, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial. Resection of the primary tumor followed by chemotherapy when possible versus systemic chemotherapy followed by resection of the primary tumor when necessary are compared in this systematic review.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven studies reported series of patients with asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer and compared first-line chemotherapy with surgery for the primary tumor (n = 850 patients). Primary outcome measure was the complication rate related to the primary tumor in situ in patients receiving first-line systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

When leaving the primary tumor in situ, the mean complications were intestinal obstruction in 13.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.6% to 18.8%] and hemorrhage in only 3.0% (95% CI 0.95% to 6.0%) of the patients. After resection, the overall postoperative morbidity ranged from 18.8% to 47.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, resection of the asymptomatic primary tumor provides only minimal palliative benefit, can give rise to major morbidity and mortality and therefore potentially delays beneficial systemic chemotherapy. When presenting with asymptomatic disease, initial chemotherapy should be started and resection of the primary tumor should be reserved for the small portion of patients who develop major complications from the primary tumor.

Primary tumour resection and survival in the palliative management of metastatic colorectal cancer

AIM

To examine whether surgical resection of the primary tumour confers a survival benefit and to identify the predictive factors of outcome in patients presenting with asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of a hospital database in a tertiary institution over a 6-year period (1999-2005) revealed 70 patients with asymptomatic primary CRC and unresectable liver metastases treated initially by systemic chemotherapy. A multivariate regression analysis model was used to determine the relative influence of multiple tumours, single/multiple liver metastases, tumour site, differentiation, response of liver and primary tumour to chemotherapy, biochemical response to chemotherapy, age at presentation, performance status and surgical intervention for the CRC primary.

RESULTS

In 67 cases (3 lost to follow-up), 63 had multiple and 4 single surgically irresectable liver metastases. A total of 41 deaths were recorded. All patients received systemic chemotherapy and surgery was performed for bowel obstruction, bleeding or stable disease (n=32). Surgery (OR 0.26; p=0.00013) and clinical response of the primary tumour (OR 0.53; p=0.012) were independently associated with prolonged survival. Proximal tumours (OR 2.61; p=0.0075) and multiple primaries (OR 3.37; p=0.02) were associated with poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection and response of the primary tumour to chemotherapy may be associated with improved survival, but proximal or multiple cancers predict poor outcome in patients with asymptomatic CRC and unresectable metastatic disease.

Selective surgical treatment of patients with rectal carcinoma and unresectable synchronous metastases based on response to preoperative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The time schedule for chemotherapy and primary tumor resection in patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) and unresectable synchronous metastases (USM) is not well defined. We evaluated whether response to chemotherapy is an appropriate criterion for deciding to perform surgery.

METHODS

We treated 22 patients with RC and USM who received chemotherapy and were regularly evaluated. After documentation of a partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD), patients were offered resection of the primary tumor. Results were compared with those of a historical control group of 42 patients who underwent immediate surgery.

RESULTS

Seven patients had a PR, four showed SD, and 11 progressed under chemotherapy. Seven patients underwent resection of the primary tumor (no perioperative mortality). The median survival for all 22 patients was 20.2 months. Patients with primary tumor resection survived 27.2 months, whereas patients without resection survived only 12.4 months (p = 0.017). The median survival in the control group was 13.5 months (perioperative mortality, 9.5%).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy and response-dependent resection of the primary tumor results in the same survival time as that attained with immediate surgery. Patients who face a poor prognosis due to progressive disease are thereby spared the risks of major rectal surgery.

Current options for the management of rectal cancer

Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer should undergo locoregional staging with transrectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or surface coil array MRI of the pelvis if that technique is available. Patients thought to have more than very early stage (T1 or T2) disease should undergo abdominal imaging as well by CT or MRI, and chest imaging with either CXR or preferably CT. The care of rectal cancer patients should be coordinated amongst an experienced multidisciplinary team to maximize the chance of cure and to minimize both local recurrence and complications of therapy. For patients with very early stage disease (T1N0 or T2N0), local resection with or without chemoradiation may be adequate therapy, but these patients must be selected carefully and should be without any poor prognostic factors. For the majority of patients with T3N0 or greater rectal cancer, standard therapy consists of neoadjuvant continuous 5-FU and radiation followed by surgery and further chemotherapy (either with 5-FU, capecitabine, or FOLFOX). The use of capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin during radiotherapy shows promise, but remains investigational pending results of phase III studies. Neoadjuvant therapy is preferred because it decreases local recurrence and appears to result in improved postoperative bowel function in comparison with postoperative therapy. Select patients with high (>10 cm from the anal verge) uT3N0 tumors may be at sufficiently low risk of local recurrence to justify omission of radiotherapy. Patients who experience pathologic complete response to radiotherapy should still receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce systemic recurrence risk until data demonstrate that this is not necessary. Patients with stage IV rectal cancer may still require local therapy with radiation, surgery, or both; however, care should be taken in these patients that chemotherapy is not excessively delayed as this is the one modality in this case that can result in improved survival.

Palliative surgery for rectal cancer in a national cohort

OBJECTIVE

Whether resection of the primary tumour is of benefit to patients with incurable rectal cancer (RC) remains a matter of debate. In this study we analyse prospectively recorded data from a national cohort.

METHOD

Among 4831 patients diagnosed with RC between 1997 and 2001, 838 (17%) patients were treated with palliative surgery. Patients were stratified according to disease stage, age and type of surgery.

RESULTS

A significantly longer median survival, 12 (range 10-13) months, was observed in patients treated with resection of the primary tumour compared with 5 (range 4-6) months in patients treated with nonresective procedures (P < 0.001). Median survival in months was significantly (P < 0.001) related to age (13; < 60 years of age, 10; 60 to 69 years, 7; 70 to 79 years, 6; >/= 80 years of age). In patients over 80 years, survival was similar regardless of the treatment. Thirty-day mortality varied from 2.5% to 20%, according to age groups.

CONCLUSION

The longer survival observed in patients with resection of the primary tumour may partly be explained by patient selection. Elderly patients (>/= 80 years) had a similar survival, irrespective of resection of the primary tumour or not. Careful consideration of the individual patient, extent of disease and treatment-related factors are important in decision-taking for palliative treatment for patients with advanced RC.

Economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to model cost-effectiveness over 25 years. Data on the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Data on costs came from a systematic review of economic evaluations and from published sources. The outcomes of the model were presented as the incremental cost per life-year gained and using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves to illustrate the likelihood that a treatment was cost-effective at various threshold values for society's willingness to pay for an additional life-year.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic surgery was on average pounds 300 more costly and slightly less effective than open surgery and had a 30 percent chance of being cost-effective if society is willing to pay pounds 30,000 for a life-year. One interpretation of the available data suggests equal survival and disease-free survival. Making this assumption, laparoscopic surgery had a greater chance of being considered cost-effective. Presenting the results as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) made no difference to the results, as utility data were poor. Evidence suggests short-term benefits after laparoscopic repair. This benefit would have to be at least 0.01 of a QALY for laparoscopic surgery to be considered cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is likely to be associated with short-term quality of life benefits, similar long-term outcomes, and an additional pounds 300 per patient. A judgment is required as to whether the short-term benefits are worth this extra cost.

Multivariate analysis of predictive factors for early postoperative death after colorectal surgery in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable liver metastases

PURPOSE

Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. This study was designed to evaluate predictive preoperative factors of early postoperative death (<3 months) in such patients.

METHODS

This study included 80 patients who underwent colorectal resection (n = 56) or diversion stoma (n = 24) for colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases. Twenty-two patients (28 percent) died during the first three months after surgery with two (2.5 percent) in-hospital postoperative deaths. Analysis of predictive preoperative factors for three-month postoperative death risk was performed.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, age older than 75 years (P = 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > II (P = 0.009), symptomatic patient (P = 0.01), bowel obstruction (P = 0.03), aspartate aminotransferase serum level >50 (1.5 N) IU/L (P = 0.008), and alkaline phosphatase >200 (2 N) IU/L (P = 0.02) were prognostic risk factors for three-month death after surgery. In multivariate analysis, age older than 75 years (relative risk = 7.9; P = 0.04) and aspartate aminotransferase serum level >50 IU/L (relative risk = 8.3; P = 0.03) were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable liver metastases, the three-month mortality rate was high (28 percent). Thus, better knowledge of risk factors could help select patients who could possibly benefit from surgery. The study suggested that age older than 75 years and liver cytolysis (>1.5 N) are associated with an increased three-month postoperative death risk. In these patients, surgery should be avoided.

Palliative resection of colorectal cancer: does it prolong survival?

BACKGROUND

It is still a matter of debate as to whether resective surgery of the primary tumor may prolong the survival of patients affected by incurable colorectal cancer (CRC). The main goal of this retrospective study, carried out on patients not undergoing any therapy other than surgery, was to quantify the benefit of primary tumor removal in patients with differently presenting incurable CRC.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty consecutive patients were operated on for incurable CRC (83 undergoing resective and 47 non-resective procedures). With the purpose of comparing homogenous populations and of identifying patients who may benefit from primary tumor resection, the patients were classified according to classes of disease, based on the "metastatic pattern" and the "resectability of primary tumor."

RESULTS

In patients with "resectable" primary tumors, resective procedures are associated with longer median survival than after non-resective ones (9 months vs 3). Only patients with distant spread without neoplastic ascites/carcinosis benefit from primary tumor removal (median survival: 9 months vs 3). Morbidity and mortality of resective procedures is not significantly different from that of non-resective surgery, either in the population studied or in any of the groups considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative resection of primary CRC should be pursued in patients with unresectable distant metastasis (without carcinomatosis), and, intraoperatively, whenever the primary tumor is technically resectable.

Strategies for the treatment of synchronous liver metastasis

AIM

Observe the outcomes after complete simultaneous or delayed resection of synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

From 1994 to 2005, 119 patients were diagnosed with CRC and SLM; 57 patients had simultaneous resection (group I) and 62 patients had staged resection (group II). Perioperative chemotherapy was considered completed if all expected cycle were administrated.

RESULTS

Overall survival rates of group I-group II at 1, 3 and 5 years were respectively 91%-93% (p=0,3), 59%-57% (p=0,09) and 32%-25% (p=0,06). The median survival time of group I-group II were respectively 46 months-40 months (p=0,07). There was no statistical difference on survival regarding location of metastasis (p=0,09) or primary tumor location (p=0,2). Patients with simultaneous or staged resection receiving optimal treatment (R0 liver surgery and complete chemotherapy) were respectively 89% and 67% (p=0,04). Twenty three patients developed isolated liver recurrence with higher frequency in staged patients (26% vs 9% p=0,03) without impairment of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of postoperative morbidity and prolonged tiring treatment, many patients having staged resection were under treated. However we did not observe statistical difference on survival but we supported that simultaneous resection has to be prefer to achieve an optimal treatment. Lung and bone metastasis are the new challenge for oncologists.

Colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases

Management in a state of flux

Timing of resection of liver metastases synchronous to colorectal tumor: proposal of prognosis-based decisional model

BACKGROUND

Timing of hepatectomy for synchronous metastases of colorectal cancer is still debated. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze prognostic factors after synchronous and delayed liver resections to define selection criteria for choosing timing of hepatectomy.

METHODS

The study was performed on 127 patients with synchronous metastases undergoing radical hepatectomy. We divided patients according to the timing of hepatectomy: 70 synchronous (group A) and 57 delayed (group B).

RESULTS

Overall survival was similar between the two groups (5-year survival 30.8% vs. 32.0% A vs. B, P = .406). The multivariate analysis evidenced four independent prognostic factors in group A: male sex (P = .04), T4 (P = .0035), more than three metastases (P = .0001), and metastatic infiltration of nearby structures (P < .0001). There were no statistically significant prognostic factors in group B. Patients with more than three metastases had a significantly worse survival in group A than in group B (3-year survival, 15.0% vs. 34.3%, P = .007); similarly, borderline significant difference was encountered in patients with T4 primary tumor (3-year survival, 16.7% vs. 60%, P = .064)

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with liver metastases synchronous with colorectal cancer with T4 primary tumor, metastasis infiltration of neighboring structures, and especially with more than three metastases should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection.

Asymptomatic colorectal cancer with un-resectable liver metastases: immediate colorectal resection or up-front systemic chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

About 20% of patients with colorectal cancer have synchronous un-resectable liver metastases. Resection of colorectal cancer in patients with moderate-severe symptoms is mandatory before starting chemotherapy. Surgical treatment of asymptomatic colorectal cancers is still a matter of discussion.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2004, we prospectively collected data on 35 consecutive patients who were treated straightaway by chemotherapy without primary tumor resection. All patients underwent FOLFOX6 as first-line chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of surgical complications related to un-resected colorectal tumor.

RESULTS

The mean interval between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy was 23.1 days (95% CI: 17.3-28.8). Fifteen of the 35 patients (42.9%) were down-staged to surgery; the mean interval between chemotherapy start and colon-rectum cancer resection was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.5-7.5). None of them developed complications related to the primary tumor during chemotherapy. Of the other 20 patients who did not undergo any curative surgery, 16 received a second line chemotherapy and 10 a third line: six patients are alive and without intestinal symptoms (mean follow up 22.5 months, 95% CI: 11.2-33.9). Only one patient (2.8%) developed clinical signs of intestinal occlusion 5.6 months from the start of chemotherapy and required urgent colostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of complications related to the non-resected colorectal tumor is very low using oxaliplatin as first line chemotherapy. Non-operative management of asymptomatic colorectal cancers with un-resectable liver metastases is a safe approach.