Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Spanish breast/ovarian cancer patients: a high proportion of mutations unique to Spain and evidence of founder effects

Genomewide high-density SNP linkage analysis of non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families identifies various candidate regions and has greater power than microsatellite studies

Background

The recent development of new high-throughput technologies for SNP genotyping has opened the possibility of taking a genome-wide linkage approach to the search for new candidate genes involved in heredity diseases. The two major breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in 30% of hereditary breast cancer cases, but the discovery of additional breast cancer predisposition genes for the non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families has so far been unsuccessful.

Results

In order to evaluate the power improvement provided by using SNP markers in a real situation, we have performed a whole genome screen of 19 non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families using 4720 genomewide SNPs with Illumina technology (Illumina's Linkage III Panel), with an average distance of 615 Kb/SNP. We identified six regions on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 7, 11 and 14 as candidates to contain genes involved in breast cancer susceptibility, and additional fine mapping genotyping using microsatellite markers around linkage peaks confirmed five of them, excluding the region on chromosome 3. These results were consistent in analyses that excluded SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium. The results were compared with those obtained previously using a 10 cM microsatellite scan (STR-GWS) and we found lower or not significant linkage signals with STR-GWS data compared to SNP data in all cases.

Conclusion

Our results show the power increase that SNPs can supply in linkage studies.

Multiplex SNaPshot for detection of BRCA1/2 common mutations in Spanish and Spanish related breast/ovarian cancer families

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 5-10% of all breast cancer are hereditary and attributable to mutations in the highly penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. The genetic analysis of these genes is complex and expensive essentially because their length. Nevertheless, the presence of recurrent and founder mutations allows a pre-screening for the identification of the most frequent mutations found in each geographical region. In Spain, five mutations in BRCA1 and other five in BRCA2 account for approximately 50% of the mutations detected in Spanish families.

METHODS

We have developed a novel PCR multiplex SNaPshot reaction that targets all ten recurrent and founder mutations identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Spain to date.

RESULTS

The SNaPshot reaction was performed on samples previously analyzed by direct sequencing and all mutations were concordant. This strategy permits the analysis of approximately 50% of all mutations observed to be responsible for breast/ovarian cancer in Spanish families using a single reaction per patient sample.

CONCLUSION

The SNaPshot assay developed is sensitive, rapid, with minimum cost per sample and additionally can be automated for high-throughput genotyping. The SNaPshot assay outlined here is not only useful for analysis of Spanish breast/ovarian cancer families, but also e.g. for populations with Spanish ancestry, such as those in Latin America.

Classification of missense variants of unknown significance inBRCA1based on clinical and tumor information

Classification of rare missense variants in disease susceptibility genes as neutral or disease-causing is important for genetic counseling. Different criteria are used to help classify such variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2; however, the strongest evidence tends to come from segregation analysis and observed cooccurrence with known pathogenic mutations, which both require information that is not readily available in most circumstances. A likelihood-based model has been developed, integrating most of the data currently used to classify these variants. We have adapted the original model, including only that information that could be more easily obtained from a cancer genetics laboratory, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH), grade, and immunohistochemical analysis to assess estrogen receptor (ER) status for the tumors of carriers of these variants. We also considered summary family history (personal or first-degree family history of bilateral breast or ovarian cancer), which was not incorporated into the original model. To test the ability of the modified model to classify missense variants in BRCA1, we analyzed 17 variants, of which 10 have previously been classified as pathogenic mutations or neutral polymorphisms. We also included a prior step consisting of the screening of the variants among 1,000 controls, with which we were able to classify five as neutral, based solely on their observed frequency. We found that combining this relatively easily collected information can be sufficient to classify variants as pathogenic or neutral if tumors from at least three carriers of the same variant can be collected and analyzed.

[Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: primary and secondary prevention for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers]

Ten years after the identification of the breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, an emerging literature has explored the efficacy of strategies for primary as well as secondary prevention of breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers. The integration of magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer screening in BRCA carriers has achieved a higher sensibility of the screening, and an early detection of breast cancer. However, we don't have yet enough level of evidence that magnetic resonance imaging could reduce mortality in BRCA carriers. Because of the limitations of screening for ovarian cancer, bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy has been established as one of the most effective strategies to prevent ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. This strategy also has a favorable effect on the reduction of risk of breast cancer if is performed before the age of 50. The management of this patients must be individualized and multidisciplinary.

Genomic analysis of the 8p11-12 amplicon in familial breast cancer

Amplification of 8p11-12 has been recurrently reported in sporadic breast cancer. These studies define a complex molecular structure with a set of minimal amplified regions, and different putative oncogenes that show a strong correlation between amplification and over-expression such as ZNF703/FLJ14299, SPFH2/C8orf2, BRF2 and RAB11FIP. However, none of these studies were carried out on familial breast malignancies. We have studied the incidence, molecular features and clinical value of this amplification in familial breast tumors associated with BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 gene mutations. We detected 9 out of 80 familial tumors with this amplicon by chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization. Next, we used a high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization array covering the 8p11-12 region to characterize this chromosomal region. This approach allowed us to define 2 cores of common amplification that largely overlap with those reported in sporadic tumors. Our findings confirm the molecular complexity of this chromosomal region and indicate that this genomic event is a common alteration in breast cancer, present not only in sporadic but also in familial tumors. Finally, we found correlation between the 8p11-12 amplification and proliferation (Ki-67) and cyclin E expression, which further proves in familial tumors the poor prognosis association previously reported in sporadic breast cancer.

Differences in the frequency and distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast/ovarian cancer cases from the Basque country with respect to the Spanish population: implications for genetic counselling

The prevalence of unique and recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic mutations and unclassified variants varies among different populations. Two hundred and thirty-six breast and/or ovarian cancer patients were analysed to clarify the role of these genes in the Basque Country. We also studied 130 healthy women from the general population from the same region. Fifteen different pathological mutations were found in 16 index cases: 10 truncating mutations, 4 missense mutations and 1 splicing mutation. c.3002_3003insT and c.5788_5789delGT, both in exon 11 of BRCA2 have not previously been described. No pathological mutations were found in cases of sporadic juvenile breast cancer. There are no recurrent mutations in our population; apart from the mutation c.9254_9258del5, which appears in only two index cases. We have also found a lot of variants whose effect is unknown. From these variants, 17 have not previously been described: 6 missenses, 6 synonymous and 5 alterations in intronic regions. We would like to highlight the fact that 14.3% of patients with 3 or more cases of breast cancer in the family, and 16.7% of patients with family history of breast and ovarian cancer, present a pathological mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. This manuscript demonstrates that each population can have different mutations and due to this, Genetic Counselling and selection criteria must be different for each population. Furthermore, this article describes for the first time some new mutations and unclassified variants found in our population.

High proportion of BRCA1/2 founder mutations in Hispanic breast/ovarian cancer families from Colombia

In South America, a high proportion of the population is of Hispanic origin with an important representation in Colombia. Since nothing is known about the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in the Hispanic population from Colombia, we conducted the first study of 53 breast/ovarian cancer families from this country. Comprehensive BRCA mutation screening was performed using a range of techniques, including DHPLC, SSCP, and PTT, followed by DNA sequencing analysis. Thirteen deleterious germline mutations (24.5%) were identified in 53 families, comprising eight in BRCA1 and five in BRCA2. The two recurrent BRCA1 mutations, 3450 delCAAG and A1708E, accounted for 100% of all BRCA1 mutations identified in this cohort and the recurrent 3034 delACAA BRCA2 mutation for 40% of all BRCA2 mutations. Haplotype analyses suggested that each of these mutations has arisen from a common ancestor. The prevalence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations was 50% in multiple case breast cancer families, and was 33% for the breast-ovarian cancer families. Our findings show that BRCA mutations account for a substantial proportion of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Colombia. The spectrum of mutations differed completely to that previously reported in Hispanic families of predominantly Mexican origin from Southern California [1] suggesting that specific genetic risk assessment strategies for the different Hispanic populations in South America and in the United States need to be developed.

Screening for large rearrangements of the BRCA2 gene in Spanish families with breast/ovarian cancer

Germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for about 30-60% of the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). A large number of point mutations have been described in both genes. However, large deletions and duplications that disrupt one or more exons are overlooked by point mutation detection approaches. Over the past years several rearrangements have been identified in BRCA1, while few studies have been designed to screen this type of mutations in BRCA2. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of large genomic rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene in Spanish breast/ovarian cancer families. The multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was employed to search gross deletions or duplications of BRCA2 in 335 Spanish moderate to high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families previously screened negative for point mutations by conventional methods. Four different and novel large genomic alterations were consistently identified by MLPA in five families, respectively: deletions of exon 2, exons 10-12 and exons 15-16 and duplication of exon 20 (in two families). RT-PCR experiments confirmed the deletion of exons 15-16. All patients harbouring a genomic rearrangement were members of high-risk families, with three or more breast/ovarian cancer cases or the presence of breast cancer in males. We provide evidence that the BRCA2 rearrangements seem to account for a relatively small proportion of familial breast cancer cases in Spanish population. The screening for these alterations as part of the comprehensive genetic testing can be recommended, especially in multiple case breast/ovarian families and families with male breast cancer cases.

Ashkenazi Jews and breast cancer: the consequences of linking ethnic identity to genetic disease

We explored the advantages and disadvantages of using ethnic categories in genetic research. With the discovery that certain breast cancer gene mutations appeared to be more prevalent in Ashkenazi Jews, breast cancer researchers moved their focus from high-risk families to ethnicity. The concept of Ashkenazi Jews as genetically unique, a legacy of Tay-Sachs disease research and a particular reading of history, shaped this new approach even as methodological imprecision and new genetic and historical research challenged it. Our findings cast doubt on the accuracy and desirability of linking ethnic groups to genetic disease. Such linkages exaggerate genetic differences among ethnic groups and lead to unequal access to testing and therapy.

BRCA1 and TP53 mutation spectrum of breast carcinoma in an ethnic population of Kashmir, an emerging high-risk area

Breast cancer shows geographical variation in its incidence, even within areas of ethnic homogeneity. Kashmir valley (India), over past few years, witnesses an increase in incidence and occurrence of familial, early onset, and male breast cancer in its unexplored ethnic population. Here, we make a preliminary attempt to estimate the nature and frequency of BRCA1 and TP53 gene mutations of breast cancer patients from Kashmir. PCR-SSCP analysis followed by direct sequencing revealed the presence of only two germline intronic variations (c.199+67T>C and c.5396+187T>C) in BRCA1 gene in only 5.26% (2/38) patients while as 44% (11/25) of sporadic breast cancer patients harboured significant amount of somatic mutations in TP53 (p=0.0074; OR=0.053). The 17 mutations found in TP53 in 11 patients, comprised of 13 substitutions [11 single-base (9 transitions+2 transversions), 1 double-base and 1 complex] and four insertions. The 11 substitutions represent missense mutations, leading to aminoacid substitution while as rest two were silent mutations. The four insertions represented three frame-shifts and one non-sense mutation. The mutation effect data was found to be significant (p=0.0002). Significant amount of mutations were found in exon 6 (p=0.04; OR=0.273) and a combination of exons 6 and 7 (p=0.0145; OR=14.22) of TP53. Comparison of mutation profile with other ethnic populations and regions reflected both differences and similarities indicating co-exposure to a unique set of risk factors. The differences could be due to exposure to particular environmental carcinogens; different lifestyle, reproductive pattern; dietary or cultural practices of Kashmiri women that need further investigations. The infrequent presence of germline BRCA1 mutations in our study agree with the idea that a great proportion of moderate risk breast cancer population could be due to the susceptibility genes distinct from BRCA1. However, high frequency of somatic TP53 gene mutations implicates TP53 as a predominant factor for breast carcinogenesis in moderate risk ethnic Kashmiri population. The study also suggests TP53 as a potential molecular marker and prognostic tool, at least in a subset of sporadic breast tumors.

The P1812A and P25TBRCA1and the 5164del4BRCA2Mutations: Occurrence in High-Risk Non-Ashkenazi Jews

Founder mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been discovered in the Ashkenazic Jewish population, but a founder mutation(s) has not been discovered among non-Ashkenazi Jews (NAJ). Two BRCA1 mutations (P1812A, P25T), and a BRCA2 mutation (5164del4) have been detected in NAJ high-risk families. We studied the prevalence of these three mutations in 270 high-risk NAJ families, including 85 from Iraq/Iran, 67 from North Africa, 27 from Yemen, 50 from the Balkan region, and 41 with mixed ancestry. The three mutations were detected only in individuals related to the original families. We conclude that the P1812A and P25T BRCA1 and 5164del4 BRCA2 mutations are not likely to be founder mutations in NAJ high-risk families. We also assessed the pathogenicity of the BRCA1 P1812A mutation in vitro using reporter gene assays in yeast and mammalian cells. We found that the BRCA1 P1812A variant activity assays yielded a slightly reduced reporter gene activity. Thus, there is some uncertainty as to the pathogenicity of BRCA1 P1812A.

A DGGE system for comprehensive mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2: application in a Dutch cancer clinic setting

Rapid and reliable identification of deleterious changes in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 has become one of the major issues in most DNA services laboratories. To rapidly detect all possible changes within the coding and splice site determining sequences of the breast cancer genes, we established a semiautomated denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) mutation scanning system. All exons of both genes are covered by the DGGE scan, comprising 120 amplicons. We use a semiautomated approach, amplifying all individual amplicons with the same PCR program, after which the amplicons are pooled. DGGE is performed using three slightly different gel conditions. Validation was performed using DNA samples with known sequence variants in 107 of the 120 amplicons; all variants were detected. This DGGE mutation scanning, in combination with a PCR test for two Dutch founder deletions in BRCA1 was then applied in 431 families in which 52 deleterious changes and 70 unclassified variants were found. Fifteen unclassified variants were not reported before. The system was easily adopted by five other laboratories, where in another 3,593 families both exons 11 were analyzed by the protein truncation test (PTT) and the remaining exons by DGGE. In total, a deleterious change (nonsense, frameshift, splice-site mutation, or large deletion) was found in 661 families (16.4%), 462 in BRCA1 (11.5%), 197 in BRCA2 (4.9%), and in two index cases a deleterious change in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 was identified. Eleven deleterious changes in BRCA1 and 36 in BRCA2 had not been reported before. In conclusion, this DGGE mutation screening method for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is proven to be highly sensitive and is easy to adopt, which makes screening of large numbers of patients feasible. The results of screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in more than 4,000 families present a valuable overview of mutations in the Dutch population.

A haplotype containing the p53 polymorphisms Ins16bp and Arg72Pro modifies cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer a high lifetime risk of developing breast and other cancers; however, remarkable differences exist regarding disease manifestation in mutation carriers. It has been suggested that other genetic and/or environmental factors modify not only the appearance but also the age of onset and type of tumor in BRCA1/2-associated cases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of two p53 polymorphisms (c.97-147ins16bp and c.215c>g, p.Arg72Pro) as potential modifiers. For this purpose we investigated the possible association between the two polymorphisms and disease status in 447 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers belonging to 170 Spanish breast and/or ovarian cancer families. Genotype and haplotype analyses revealed that the presence of a specific haplotype carrying the allele without the 16-bp insertion and the variant allele for the Arg72Pro (No Ins-72Pro haplotype) was associated with an earlier age of onset in BRCA2 mutation carriers. We found an increased risk of developing a first primary tumor (breast or ovarian) before 35 years of age for individuals who carried at least one No Ins-72Pro haplotype (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.15-6.29; P=0.022). We confirmed these data by a functional study in which we compared different p53 genotypes in relation to their apoptotic response after cell treatment with a cytotoxic drug (AraC). Our results revealed a decrease in p53 apoptotic rate associated with the No Ins-72Pro haplotype.

Genomic Rearrangements at the BRCA1 Locus in Spanish Families with Breast/Ovarian Cancer

Background: Large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) account for a substantial proportion of the BRCA1 disease-causing changes, or variations, identified in families with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer [HB(O)C]. Great differences in the spectrum and prevalence of BRCA1 LGR have been observed among populations. Here we report the first comprehensive analysis of BRCA1 LGRs conducted in Spain.

Methods: We used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to screen for BRCA1 LGRs in the index case individuals of 384 HB(O)C families who previously tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 point variations, small insertions, and deletions. An alternative set of MLPA probes, long-range PCR, and real-time PCR were used to confirm positive results.

Results: We have identified 8 different BRCA1 rearrangements (del exon 1–24, del exon 8–13, del exon 11–15, del exon 14, dup exon 19–20, dup exon 20, exon 21–22 amplification, and del exon 23–24). With the exception of del exon 8–13, they are novel alterations. Overall, BRCA1 LGRs explain 1.4% of the Spanish HB(O)C families, and they account for 8.2% of all BRCA1 pathogenic variations identified in our study population. BRCA1 genetic variants affecting hybridization of commercially available MLPA probes are very rare in our population.

Conclusions: Screening for BRCA1 LGRs should be mandatory in Spanish HB(O)C families. A high proportion of country-specific rearrangements are scattered along the gene. MLPA is a robust method to screen for LGRs in our population. MLPA analysis of positive samples with an alternative set of probes, together with long-range PCR and real-time PCR, is a feasible approach to confirm results in cases in which LGR breakpoints have not been characterized.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational spectrum and evidence for genetic anticipation in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families

We present the first characterisation of the mutational spectrum of the entire coding sequences and exon-intron boundaries of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as well as large BRCA1 rearrangements in Portuguese families with inherited predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer. Of the 100 probands studied, pathogenic mutations were identified in 22 (24.7%) of 89 breast and/or ovarian cancer families with more than one affected member (15 in BRCA1 and seven in BRCA2), but in none of the 11 patients without family history of cancer. One (6.7%) of the BRCA1 mutations is a large deletion involving exons 11-15. Seven pathogenic point mutations are novel: 2088C>T, 2156delinsCC, and 4255_4256delCT in BRCA1 and 4608_4609delTT, 5036delA, 5583_5584insT, and 8923C>T in BRCA2. The novel 2156delinsCC was identified in three probands from different families and probably represents a founder mutation in our population. We also found a previously reported 3450_3453del4 mutation in three unrelated patients. In addition to the 22 pathogenic mutations, we identified 19 missense mutations of uncertain pathogenic significance, three of them (5241G>C in BRCA1 and IVS6+13C>T and 3731T>C in BRCA2) previously undescribed. The percentage of cases with truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was higher in breast/ovarian cancer (37.0%, mostly BRCA1) and male breast cancer (40%, all BRCA2) families than in families with only female breast cancer (17.5%). Interestingly, we found evidence for genetic anticipation regarding age at diagnosis of both breast and ovarian cancer in those families presenting affected members in more than one generation. These findings should be taken into consideration while planning screening and prophylactic measures in families with inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer.

High proportion of novel mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast/ovarian cancer patients from Castilla-León (central Spain)

A total of 264 unrelated breast/ovarian cancer patients and 45 healthy individuals with familial antecedents referred for genetic testing were scanned for germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE) and heteroduplex analysis by capillary array electrophoresis (HA-CAE). We detected 101 distinct mutations (41 in BRCA1 and 60 in BRCA2); ten of them have not been previously reported. These mutations were c.2411_2429dup19, c.2802_2805delCAAA and c.5294A>G (p.E1725E) of BRCA1; and c.667C>T (p.Q147X), c.2683C>T (p.Q819X), c.5344_5347delAATA, c.5578_5579delAA;insT, c.8260_8261insGA, c.744+14C>T and c.8099A>G (p.Y2624C) of BRCA2. Twenty-four different mutations, including seven of the new mutations (five frameshift and two nonsense), were classified as pathogenic. These 24 alterations were found in 39 families (12.6% of all families). A remarkable proportion of deleterious mutations were found in BRCA2: 25 families carried a mutation in BRCA2 (BRCA2+; 64.1%) compared with 14 families BRCA1+ (35.9%). The highest incidences of deleterious mutations were found in families with three or more cases of site-specific breast cancer (BC) (27.4%) and families with BC and ovarian cancer (22.2%). Finally, four recurrent mutations, 3036_3039delACAA, c.5374_5377delTATG of BRCA2, as well as c.5272-1G>A and c.5242C>A (p.A1708E) of BRCA1, accounted for 44% of all of the deleterious mutations.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a South American population

A sample of 64 high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families from Chile were screened for germline mutations in the coding sequences and exon-intron boundaries of BRCA1 (MIN no. 113705) and BRCA2 (MIN no. 600185) genes using conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis, and the mutations found were confirmed with direct sequencing. Seven families (10.9%) were found to carry BRCA1 mutations and three families (4.7%) had BRCA2 mutations. Six different pathogenic mutations were detected in BRCA1, four that had been reported previously (c.187_188delAG; c.300T-->G, c.3450_3453delCAAG and IVS17-1G-->A) and two novel mutations (c.2605_2606delTT and c.4185_4188delCAAG). In BRCA2, we found three different pathogenic mutations, two previously described (c.6174delT and c.6503_6504delTT) and one novel mutation (c.5667delT). We also identified nine variants of unknown significance (five in BRCA1 and four in BRCA2). These findings indicate that the Chilean population has a heterogeneous spectrum of prevalent BRCA mutations. Given the results obtained in our study, the screening of the entire BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding regions is necessary for the molecular genetic testing of Chilean high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients. To our knowledge, this is the first genetic study of BRCA gene mutations conducted in Chile. The Chilean population has a well-known admixed Amerindian-Caucasian ratio and, therefore, our findings are not only important per se, but they constitute the basis for improved and more specific genetic counselling, as well as to support for preventive campaigns geared toward the Chilean population.

Histopathology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer

Hereditary breast carcinomas that are attributable to BRCA1/2 mutations have their own morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. BRCA1-associated carcinomas are poorly differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinomas that frequently show morphological features of typical or atypical medullary carcinoma. BRCA2-associated breast carcinomas tend to be of higher grade than sporadic age-matched controls. BRCA1tumors have been found to be more frequently estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative, and p53-positive than are age-matched controls, whereas these differences are not usually found in BRCA2-associated tumors. In addition, BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinomas show a low frequency of HER2 expression. Most BRCA1 breast carcinomas are characterized by the expression of basal (myoepithelial) markers, such as cytokeratin 5/6 and or P-cadherin. These features could be used to distinguish patients who are likely to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation, thus indicating which gene should be screened for first in families with a high incidence of breast and ovarian cancer.

Genes de susceptibilidad al cáncer de mama

Five percent of all cases of breast cancer (BC) show a hereditary component related to gene mutations with an autosomic dominant transmission. To date, few genes are known to be responsible of hereditary BC. The germline mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes account for less than 50% of families with breast/ovarian cancer predisposition. The large percentage of families with multiple cases of female BC and no BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations detected could be attributed to the existence of other high or low susceptibility genes acting together with lifestyle risk factors. The predisposition to BC in carriers of ATM mutations has been documented previously. Due to the frequency of ATM heterozygotes in the general population, the mutations in this gene could be associated with up to 5% of BC cases. The mutation 1100delC of the CHEK2 gene seems to be a low penetrance allele of BC susceptibility. The objective of the present manuscript is to review some of the susceptibility genes identified to date.

BRCA1–2 mutations in breast cancer: Identification of nine new variants of BRCA1–2 genes in a population from central Western Spain

We carried out a mutational analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 103 individuals from a population in Western Central Spain and we identified nine new variants: two truncating mutations in BRCA2 [2604C>A (Y792X), 8873del4], three missense mutations in BRCA2 [677A>G (H150R), 958G>A (D224N) and 3398A>G (K1057R], and four silent mutations, two in BRCA1 [1115T>G (R332R) and IVS24+36 C>G], and two in BRCA2 [2583T>A (I785I) and 7854G>A (T2542T)]. In two unrelated families of our population, we identified the BRCA1 1806C>T (Q563X) mutation, which is considered to be a Swedish founder mutation. BRCA1 1806C>T (Q563X) and BRCA2 3036del4 gene mutations were the most frequent in our series.

The Accumulation of Specific Amplifications Characterizes Two Different Genomic Pathways of Evolution of Familial Breast Tumors

PURPOSE AND METHODS

High-level DNA amplifications are recurrently found in breast cancer, and some of them are associated with poor patient prognosis. To determine their frequency and co-occurrence in familial breast cancer, we have analyzed 80 tumors previously characterized for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations (26 BRCA1, 18 BRCA2, and 36 non-BRCA1/2) using high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization.

RESULTS

Twenty-one regions were identified as recurrently amplified, such as 8q21-23 (26.25%), 17q22-25 (13.75%), 13q21-31 (12.50%), and 8q24 (11.25%), many of which were altered in each familial breast cancer group. These amplifications defined an amplifier phenotype that is correlated with a higher genomic instability. Based on these amplifications, two different genomic pathways have been established in association with 8q21-23 and/or 17q22-25 and with 13q21-31 amplification. These pathways are associated with specific genomic regions of amplification, carry specific immunohistochemical characteristics coincident with high and low aggressiveness, and have a trend to be associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2/X, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our data suggest the existence of two different patterns of evolution, probably common to familial and sporadic breast tumors.

Lack of germ-line mutations at the specific BRCA1-IRIS coding sequence in 114 Spanish high-risk breast/ovarian families

A new BRCA1 locus product called BRCA1-IRIS has been identified recently. High-risk breast/ovarian families have not been screened for germ-line mutations at the specific BRCA1-IRIS coding sequence, as it was considered merely as part of BRCA1 intron 11. Here we report the first comprehensive screening of germ-line mutations in a cohort of 116 index cases from high-risk breast/ovarian families in which no germ-line mutation was identified in BRCA1 or BRCA2. We did not find germ-line mutations at the specific BRCA1-IRIS coding sequence in any sample. The only heterozygous patter identified by DGGE was caused by a C to A substitution in the non-coding 3' sequence, 123 bases downstream of the BRCA1-IRIS stop codon (IVS11+268C/A). The data indicates that it is probably a neutral change not associated with cancer risk. Our analysis suggests that the role of germ-line mutations at the specific BRCA1-IRIS sequence in breast cancer susceptibility, if any, is marginal and do not explain a significant fraction of high-risk breast/ovarian families, at least in the population analyzed.

Incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in 54 Chilean families with breast/ovarian cancer, genotype-phenotype correlations

Our aim was to analyze the incidence of mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 54 families with breast/ovarian cancer. Families were selected from three Institutions following the standard criteria for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. PCR amplification of all exons was performed, followed by SSCP, heteroduplex, PTT and sequencing analysis. We identified eight truncation mutations, three in the BRCA1 gene and five in the BRCA2 gene. Three of these mutations have not been reported previously by other groups: 308insA in one family, 3936 C>T in two families, for BRCA1, and 4970insTG in one family for BRCA2. In addition two families having Ashkenazi Jewish ancestors present the well known mutations 185delAG and 6174delT. Interestingly, 5 out of 11 families have mutations recurrent in Spanish families. Among the 54 families selected, seven have breast and ovary cancer cases, and only two presented a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Other cancers as prostate and stomach are frequent among relatives carrying the mutation. Five cases of very early onset (<31 years old) breast cancer were detected. The frequencies of BRCA1 (0.074) and BRCA2 (0.13) mutations in our families is low but similar to the incidence found in other populations, like in Spain. Since is widely known that risk factors that modulate the development of breast cancer such as lifestyle risk factors, geographic location, country of origin and socioeconomic status, besides a familial history of breast cancer our findings suggest that the history of colonization and immigrations is very relevant when studying hereditary factors associated to breast cancer.

Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins in familial breast cancer differentiate BRCA2-associated tumors

PURPOSE

Morphologic and immunohistochemical studies of familial breast cancers have identified specific characteristics associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated tumors when compared with BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors, but have not identified differences between BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes participate in the DNA repair pathway, we have performed an immunohistochemical study with markers related to this pathway to establish the profile of the three groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have studied two tissue microarrays that include 103 familial and 104 sporadic breast tumors, with a panel of DNA repair markers including ATM, CHEK2, RAD51, RAD50, XRCC3, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

RESULTS

We found more frequent expression of CHEK2 in BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors than in non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic tumors. We found absence of nuclear expression and presence of cytoplasmic expression of RAD51 in BRCA2 tumors that differentiate them from other familial tumors. We validated these results with a new series of patient cases. The final study with 253 familial patient cases (74 BRCA1, 71 BRCA2, 108 non-BRCA1/2), and 288 sporadic patient cases, has allowed us to confirm our preliminary results. Because BRCA2 tumors present a specific immunohistochemical profile for RAD51 and CHEK2 markers that is different from non-BRCA1/2 tumors, we have built a multivariate model with these markers that distinguish both tumors with an estimated probability of at least 76%.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that BRCA2 tumors demonstrate more cytoplasmic and less nuclear RAD51 staining, and increased CHEK2 staining. This pattern may distinguish BRCA2 from familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors.

Prevalence of BRCA mutations and founder effect in high-risk Hispanic families

Approximately 12% of the U.S. population is Hispanic, with the majority residing in urban centers such as Los Angeles. The prevalence of BRCA mutations among high-risk Hispanic families is unknown.

METHODS

One hundred and ten unrelated probands of Hispanic origin, with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, presented for genetic cancer risk assessment, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved registry and underwent BRCA testing. Haplotype analyses were done if BRCA mutations were observed in two or more unrelated probands.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 37 years (range = 23-59) for the 89 (81%) probands with invasive breast cancer. Overall, 34 (30.9%) had deleterious mutations (25 in BRCA1, 9 in BRCA2), 25 (22.7%) had one or more unclassified variants, and 51 (46.4%) had negative results. The mean pretest mutation probability using the Couch model, Myriad model, and BRCAPro was 19.6% (range = 4-77%). The combined average mutation probability was 32.8% for carriers, 15.5% for noncarriers, and 12.9% for variant carriers (P < 0.0001). The most common deleterious mutation was 185delAG (4 of 34, 11.8%). The Hispanic 185delAG carrier families share the same haplotype from D17s1320 through BRCA1, as do two reference Ashkenazi Jewish families. Haplotype analyses of additional recurrent BRCA1 mutations [IVS5+1G>A (n=2),S955X (n = 3), R1443X (n = 3), and 2552delC (n = 2)] also suggest founder effects, with four of six mutations seen almost exclusively in families with Latin American/Caribbean or Spanish ancestry.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study to date of high-risk Hispanic families in the United States. Six recurrent mutations accounted for 47% (16 of 34) of the deleterious mutations in this cohort. The BRCA1185delAG mutation was prevalent (3.6%) in this clinic-based cohort of predominantly Mexican descent, and shared the Ashkenazi Jewish founder haplotype.

The molecular pathology of hereditary breast cancer: genetic testing and therapeutic implications

Cancer arising in carriers of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes differs from sporadic breast cancer of age-matched controls and from non-BRCA1/2 familial breast carcinomas in its morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics. Most BRCA1 carcinomas have the basal cell phenotype, a subtype of high-grade, highly proliferating, estrogen receptor- and HER2-negative breast carcinomas, characterized by the expression of basal or myoepithelial markers such as basal keratins, P-cadherin, epidermal growth factor receptor, etc. This phenotype is rarely found in BRCA2 carcinomas, which are of higher grade than sporadic age-matched controls, but tend to be estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-positive. The expression of the cell-cycle proteins cyclins A, B1 and E and SKP2 is associated with a BRCA1 phenotype, whereas cyclin D1 and p27 expression is associated with BRCA2 carcinomas. Recent studies have shown that hereditary carcinomas that are not attributable to BRCA1/2 mutations have phenotypic similarities to BRCA2 tumors, but tend to be of lower grade and proliferation index. Somatic mutations in the BRCA genes are rarely found in hereditary tumors; by contrast, BRCA1 and BRCA2 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is found in almost all BRCA1 and BRCA2 carcinomas, respectively. Furthermore, all types of hereditary breast carcinomas have a low frequency of HER2 expression. Finally, comparative genomic hybridization studies have revealed differences in chromosomal gains and losses between genotypes. The pathological and molecular features of hereditary breast cancer can drive specific treatments and influence the process of mutation screening. In addition, detecting molecular changes such as BRCA1/2 LOH in nonatypical cells obtained by random fine-needle aspiration, ductal lavage or nipple aspirate fluid may help to earlier identify carrier women who are at an even higher risk of developing breast carcinoma.

A high frequency of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in western Sweden detected with complementary screening techniques

Dominant inheritance is presumed in 6-10% of breast and ovarian cancers. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most commonly identified causative genes in such families. The frequency of mutation carriers with breast/ovarian cancer depends on the population studied, and display considerable variation that coincides with ethnic and geographical diversity. Mutation analyses were performed in 143 families registered at the Cancer Genetic Counseling Clinic of western Sweden. In a thorough mutation screening procedure, the entire BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were analyzed using a combination of complementary mutation detection techniques. Mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 were detected in 36% (52 out of 143) of all screened families. All families were clinically evaluated regarding age at diagnosis, type of cancer and number of cancer cases in the family. Among high-risk families, the mutation detection rate was 39% (46 out of 117). The detection rate observed among families with cases of ovarian cancer (42 out of 62, 68%), was substantially higher than in families with only breast cancer (10 out of 81, 12%). Age at ovarian cancer did not seem to have an effect on the detection rate. The analyses revealed 11 frameshift mutations, 4 nonsense mutations and 2 large deletions. Notably, the BRCA1 c.3171ins5 mutation accounted for 34 of 52 (65%) identified mutations. Seven mutations are novel: BRCA1c.409_410del; c.1912T>G; c.2228_2229del; c.3029delA; c.3433delA, a large deletion covering exons 1-3 of BRCA1and one BRCA2 mutation; BRCA2c.6287_6290del. We have shown that the founder mutation BRCA1 c.3171ins5 has a great influence on western Swedish breast/ovarian cancer families along with a high number of mutations unique for the region. In order to achieve a high mutation detection rate we suggest a combination of several detection techniques.

Mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Iranian high risk breast cancer families

PURPOSE

Germline mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. At present, over thousand distinct BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been identified. Specific mutations are found to be common within particular populations, resulting from genetic founder effects. To investigate the contribution of germline mutations in these two genes to inherited breast cancer in Iran, we performed BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation analyses in ten Iranian high risk breast cancer families. This is the first study analysing the complete coding sequences of both genes that concerns the Iranian population.

METHODS

BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation detection included sequencing of the coding and the 3' and 5' untranslated regions. To detect large genomic rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene semi-quantitative multiplex PCR was performed.

RESULTS

Two pathogenic mutations in the BRCA2 gene were detected: a novel deletion c.4415_4418delAGAA and a previously described insertion c.6033_6034insGT. In addition, one intronic variation g.5075-53C > T and a deletion/insertion g.*381_389del9ins29 in the 3' untranslated region of BRCA1 were found in two of the investigated families. Both sequence alterations were absent in an age matched Iranian control group. The BRCA2 homozygous variation p.N372H, previously associated with an increased risk for developing breast cancer, was not identified in this study. We did not detect large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 in patients tested negatively for disease causing mutations in both genes by standard sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, the BRCA2 mutations c.4415_4418delAGAA and c.6033_6034insGT have not been identified in any investigated population except the Iranian. Whether both mutations are specific for the Iranian population or a special subgroup remains to be investigated in larger studies. The absence of BRCA1 mutations in the analysed families may suggest that penetrance or prevalence of BRCA1 mutations may be lower in Iran.

High proportion of recurrent germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene in breast and ovarian cancer patients from the Prague area

Background

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been shown to account for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. The purpose of our study was to estimate the incidence and spectrum of pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in high-risk Czech families.

Methods

A total of 96 Czech families with recurrent breast and/or ovarian cancer and 55 patients considered to be at high-risk but with no reported family history of cancer were screened for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes. The entire coding sequence of each gene was analyzed using a combination of the protein truncation test and direct DNA sequencing.

Results

A total of 35 mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes were identified in high-risk families (36.5%). Pathogenic mutations were found in 23.3% of breast cancer families and in 59.4% of families with the occurrence of both breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, four mutations were detected in 31 (12.9%) women with early onset breast cancer. One mutation was detected in seven (14.3%) patients affected with both a primary breast and ovarian cancer and another in three (33.3%) patients with a bilateral breast cancer. A total of 3 mutations in BRCA1 were identified among 14 (21.4%) women with a medullary breast carcinoma. Of 151 analyzed individuals, 35 (23.2%) carried a BRCA1 mutation and 9 (6.0%) a BRCA2 mutation. One novel truncating mutation was found in BRCA1 (c.1747A>T) and two in BRCA2 (c.3939delC and c.5763dupT). The 35 identified BRCA1 mutations comprised 13 different alterations. Three recurrent mutations accounted for 71.4% of unrelated individuals with detected gene alterations. The BRCA1 c.5266dupC (5382insC) was detected in 51.4% of mutation positive women. The mutations c.3700_3704del5 and c.181T>G (300T>G) contributed to 11.4% and 8.6% of pathogenic mutations, respectively. A total of eight different mutations were identified in BRCA2. The novel c.5763dupT mutation, which appeared in two unrelated families, was the only recurrent alteration of the BRCA2 gene identified in this study.

Conclusion

Mutational analysis of BRCA1/2 genes in 151 high-risk patients characterized the spectrum of gene alterations and demonstrated the dominant role of the BRCA1 c.5266dupC allele in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

A founder mutation in the CLCNKB gene causes Bartter syndrome type III in Spain

The term "Bartter syndrome" encompasses a group of closely related inherited tubulopathies characterized by markedly reduced NaCl transport by the distal nephron. At present, five different genetic variants have been demonstrated. The majority of patients with so-called classic Bartter syndrome carry inactivating mutations of the CLCNKB gene encoding the basolateral ClC-Kb chloride channel (Bartter syndrome type III). The purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying mutation in cases of classic Bartter syndrome followed at our center. Ten patients, including two sisters, with clinical and biochemical features of classic Bartter syndrome were included in the mutational analysis. They originated from different regions of Spain with either Basque or Spanish ancestry. There was no history of consanguineous marriage in any of the kindreds. The parents and siblings of each patient, as well as a population of 300 healthy control adult subjects, were also analyzed. All ten patients were found to be homozygous for an identical missense mutation in the CLCNKB gene, substituting a threonine for an alanine at codon 204 (A204T) in the putative fifth transmembrane domain of the protein. None of the 300 control subjects were homozygous for the A204T allele. Overall, the A204T mutation was detected on 2/600 control chromosomes. Despite sharing a common mutation, the clinical manifestations of the syndrome in the patients varied from lack of symptoms to severe growth retardation. Demonstration of a point mutation within the CLCNKB gene as the apparently unique cause of Bartter syndrome type III in Spain is highly suggestive of a founder effect. Our results also support the lack of correlation between genotype and phenotype in this disease.

Rapid mutation detection in complex genes by heteroduplex analysis with capillary array electrophoresis

Mutational analysis of large multiexon genes without prevalent mutations is a laborious undertaking that requires the use of a high-throughput scanning technique. The Human Genome Project has enabled the development of powerful techniques for mutation detection in large multiexon genes. We have transferred heteroduplex analysis (HA) by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis of the two major breast cancer (BC) predisposing genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, to a multicapillary DNA sequencer in order to increase the throughput of this technique. This new method that we have called heteroduplex analysis by capillary array electrophoresis (HA-CAE) is based on the use of multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), different fluorescent labels and HA in a 16-capillary DNA sequencer. To date, a total of 114 different DNA sequence variants (19 insertions/deletions and 95 single-nucleotide substitutions - SNS) of BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 431 unrelated BC families have been successfully detected by HA-CAE. In addition, we have optimized the multiplex-PCR conditions for the colorectal cancer genes MLH1 and MSH2 in order to analyze them by HA-CAE. Both genes have been amplified in 13 multiplex groups, which contain the 35 exons, and their corresponding flanking intronic sequences. MLH1 and MSH2 have been analyzed in nine hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients, and we have found six different DNA changes: one complex deletion/insertion mutation in MLH1 exon 19 and another five SNS. Only the complex mutation and one SNS may be classified as cancer-prone mutations. Our experience has revealed that HA-CAE is a simple, fast, reproducible and sensitive method to scan the sequences of complex genes.

Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of BRCA1 missense sequence variants remain uncharacterized for their possible effect on protein expression and function, and therefore are unclassified in terms of their pathogenicity. BRCA1 plays diverse cellular roles and it is unlikely that any single functional assay will accurately reflect the total cellular implications of missense mutations in this gene.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the effect of two BRCA1 variants, 5236G>C (G1706A) and 5242C>A (A1708E) on BRCA1 function, and to survey the relative usefulness of several assays to direct the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA genes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from a range of bioinformatic, genetic, and histopathological analyses, and in vitro functional assays indicated that the 1708E variant was associated with the disruption of different cellular functions of BRCA1. In transient transfection experiments in T47D and 293T cells, the 1708E product was mislocalised to the cytoplasm and induced centrosome amplification in 293T cells. The 1708E variant also failed to transactivate transcription of reporter constructs in mammalian transcriptional transactivation assays. In contrast, the 1706A variant displayed a phenotype comparable to wildtype BRCA1 in these assays. Consistent with functional data, tumours from 1708E carriers showed typical BRCA1 pathology, while tumour material from 1706A carriers displayed few histopathological features associated with BRCA1 related tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive range of genetic, bioinformatic, and functional analyses have been combined for the characterisation of BRCA1 unclassified sequence variants. Consistent with the functional analyses, the combined odds of causality calculated for the 1706A variant after multifactorial likelihood analysis (1:142) indicates a definitive classification of this variant as "benign". In contrast, functional assays of the 1708E variant indicate that it is pathogenic, possibly through subcellular mislocalisation. However, the combined odds of 262:1 in favour of causality of this variant does not meet the minimal ratio of 1000:1 for classification as pathogenic, and A1708E remains formally designated as unclassified. Our findings highlight the importance of comprehensive genetic information, together with detailed functional analysis for the definitive categorisation of unclassified sequence variants. This combination of analyses may have direct application to the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Phenotypic characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors based in a tissue microarray study with 37 immunohistochemical markers

Familial breast cancers that are associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations differ in both their morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. To further characterize the molecular difference between genotypes, the authors evaluated the expression of 37 immunohistochemical markers in a tissue microarray (TMA) containing cores from 20 BRCA1, 14 BRCA2, and 59 sporadic age-matched breast carcinomas. Markers analyzed included, amog others, common markers in breast cancer, such as hormone receptors, p53 and HER2, along with 15 molecules involved in cell cycle regulation, such as cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases (CDK) and CDK inhibitors (CDKI), apoptosis markers, such as BCL2 and active caspase 3, and two basal/myoepithelial markers (CK 5/6 and P-cadherin). In addition, we analyzed the amplification of CCND1, CCNE, HER2 and MYC by FISH. Unsupervised cluster data analysis of both hereditary and sporadic cases using the complete set of immunohistochemical markers demonstrated that most BRCA1-associated carcinomas grouped in a branch of ER-, HER2-negative tumors that expressed basal cell markers and/or p53 and had higher expression of activated caspase 3. The cell cycle proteins associated with these tumors were E2F6, cyclins A, B1 and E, SKP2 and Topo IIalpha. In contrast, most BRCA2-associated carcinomas grouped in a branch composed by ER/PR/BCL2-positive tumors with a higher expression of the cell cycle proteins cyclin D1, cyclin D3, p27, p16, p21, CDK4, CDK2 and CDK1. In conclusion, our study in hereditary breast cancer tumors analyzing 37 immunohistochemical markers, define the molecular differences between BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors with respect to hormonal receptors, cell cycle, apoptosis and basal cell markers.

A Predictor Based on the Somatic Genomic Changes of the BRCA1/BRCA2 Breast Cancer Tumors Identifies the Non-BRCA1/BRCA2 Tumors with BRCA1 Promoter Hypermethylation

The genetic changes underlying in the development and progression of familial breast cancer are poorly understood. To identify a somatic genetic signature of tumor progression for each familial group, BRCA1, BRCA2, and non-BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCAX) tumors, by high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization, we have analyzed 77 tumors previously characterized for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations. Based on a combination of the somatic genetic changes observed at the six most different chromosomal regions and the status of the estrogen receptor, we developed using random forests a molecular classifier, which assigns to a given tumor a probability to belong either to the BRCA1 or to the BRCA2 class. Because 76.5% (26 of 34) of the BRCAX cases were classified with our predictor to the BRCA1 class with a probability of &gt;50%, we analyzed the BRCA1 promoter region for aberrant methylation in all the BRCAX cases. We found that 15 of the 34 BRCAX analyzed tumors had hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene. When we considered the predictor, we observed that all the cases with this epigenetic event were assigned to the BRCA1 class with a probability of &gt;50%. Interestingly, 84.6% of the cases (11 of 13) assigned to the BRCA1 class with a probability &gt;80% had an aberrant methylation of the BRCA1 promoter. This fact suggests that somatic BRCA1 inactivation could modify the profile of tumor progression in most of the BRCAX cases.

Mutaciones en BRCA1 y BRCA2 en pacientes con historia familiar de cáncer de mama

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Familial breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) has been associated with germ-line mutations in the cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. The mutational spectra vary depending on the study populations and the criteria applied for patient selection. The present study reports the mutations found in 48 families of the Valencian Community studied in the University Hospital La Fe of Valencia (Spain).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We analysed the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes of 48 families (55 patients) with a family history of BC an/or OC. The method consists of DNA extraction, followed by a polymerase chain reaction, mutational analysis by heteroduplex formation in conformation-sensitive-gel electrophoresis and sequencing of the heteroduplex detected.

RESULTS

We report eight different deleterious mutations, four in BRCA1 and four in BRCA2 and four unclassified variants (UV). We also identified the presence of the BRCA1 3889_3890delG mutation for the first time in the Spanish population. In BRCA2, we report two mutations not described in the breast cancer information care, the 5025delT which is completely new and the 9206_9219del14, which has already been described in Spanish population. We also describe for the first time the presence of UV 8038C>T in this gene.

CONCLUSIONS

The mutational spectra and the presence of new mutations in the limited number of patients give support to the relevance of the study population in the mutational spectra.

The variant E233G of the RAD51D gene could be a low-penetrance allele in high-risk breast cancer families without BRCA1/2 mutations

Six SNPs have been detected in the DNA repair genes RAD51C and RAD51D, not previously characterized. The novel variant E233G in RAD51D is more highly represented in high-risk, site-specific, familial breast cancer cases that are not associated with the BRCA1/2 genes, with a frequency of 5.74% (n = 174) compared to a control population (n = 567) and another subset of breast cancer patients (n = 765) with a prevalence of around 2% only (comparison to controls, OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.12-6.03; p < 0.021). We found that the immunohistochemical profile detected in available tumors from these patients differs slightly from those described in non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Finally, the structural prediction of the putative functional consequence of this change indicates that it can diminish protein stability and structure. This suggests a role for E233G as a low-penetrance susceptibility gene in the specific subgroup of high-risk familial breast cancer cases that are not related to BRCA1/2.