101
|
Kim EEH, Kang J. Association between Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use and Fear of Cancer Recurrence among Breast Cancer Survivors. Korean J Fam Med 2022; 43:132-140. [PMID: 35320899 PMCID: PMC8943234 DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the association between complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among breast cancer survivors, using a validated multidimensional FCR-assessing instrument. Despite the debate over its medical effects, the use of CAM in breast cancer survivors is increasing. Methods We recruited 326 breast cancer survivors who had completed the primary cancer treatment. Information on CAM use was obtained using a self-administered questionnaire, and FCR was assessed using the Korean version of the FCR Inventory (FCRI). Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between CAM use and FCR. Results CAM users had higher total FCR scores than CAM non-users after covariate adjustment (CAM users: 74.6 vs. CAM non-users: 68.7; P=0.047). Among the FCRI subscales, CAM users showed higher coping strategy scores (CAM users: 22.3 vs. CAM non-users: 20.6; P=0.034) in the multivariable adjusted analysis. The use of multiple types of CAM was associated with increased FCR in a dose-dependent manner (P=0.002). Conclusion Breast cancer survivors who used CAM had a higher FCR than CAM non-users. The dose-response relationship between the use of multiple types of CAM and FCR suggests that breast cancer survivors who use multiple types of CAM should be provided with appropriate psychological interventions to decrease FCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Eun Hwa Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jihun Kang
- Department of Family Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Central Institute for Medical Research, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
- Corresponding Author: Jihun Kang Tel: +82-51-990-6551, Fax: +82-51-990-3005, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
McDowell L, Rischin D, Gough K, Henson C. Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychosocial Distress and Unmet Needs in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:834068. [PMID: 35242716 PMCID: PMC8885992 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.834068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common cancer involving the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck and is associated with a number of etiological factors, including cigarette smoking, alcohol and betel nut consumption and exposure to high-risk human papillomavirus. The risk of HNSCC increases with age, peaking in the seventh and eighth decade, but this varies by anatomical and histological subtype. While several advancements have been made in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) in recent decades, undertaking curative treatment still subjects the majority of HNSCC patients to substantial treatment-related toxicity requiring patients to tolerate a gamut of physical, psychological, and emotional demands on their reserves. In conjunction with other patient-related factors, clinicians involved in treating patients with HNSCC may incorporate advancing chronological age into their decision-making process when determining treatment recommendations. While advancing chronological age may be associated with increased concerns regarding physical treatment tolerability, clinicians may also be concerned about heightened vulnerability in various health and wellbeing outcomes. The available literature, however, does not provide evidence of this vulnerability in patients with advancing age, and, in many instances, older patients self-report greater resilience compared to their younger counterparts. While this data is reassuring it is limited by selection bias and heterogeneity in trial and study design and the absence of a consistent definition of the elderly patient with HNSCC. This narrative review article also includes a review of the measures used to assess HRQL, psychosocial outcomes and unmet needs in elderly or older patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lachlan McDowell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Danny Rischin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Christina Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Martino ML, Lemmo D, Gargiulo A, Barberio D, Abate V, Freda MF. Processing Breast Cancer Experience in Under-Fifty Women: Longitudinal Trajectories of Narrative Sense Making Functions. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2022.2043208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Lemmo
- Department of Humanities, Federico II University Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Gargiulo
- Department of Humanities, Federico II University Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Barberio
- Clinical Psychology Unit, National Cancer Institute “Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy
| | - Valentina Abate
- Clinical Psychology Unit, National Cancer Institute “Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
104
|
Thompson JR, Smith AL, Lo SN, Kasparian NA, Saw RP, Dieng M, Seaman L, Martin LK, Guitera P, Milne D, Schmid H, Cust AE, Bartula I. Protocol for the implementation of a stepped-care model to address fear of cancer recurrence in patients previously diagnosed with early-stage (0-II) melanoma. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054337. [PMID: 35241467 PMCID: PMC8896053 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is commonly reported by patients diagnosed with early-stage (0-II) melanoma and can have a significant impact on daily functioning. This study will pilot the implementation of the Melanoma Care Program, an evidence-based, psychological intervention to reduce FCR, into routine practice, using a stepped-care model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Intervention effectiveness and level of implementation will be investigated using a hybrid type I design. Between 4 weeks before and 1 week after their next dermatological appointment, patients with melanoma will be invited to complete the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short-Form, measuring self-reported FCR severity. Using a stepped-care model, clinical cut-off points will guide the level of support offered to patients. This includes: (1) usual care, (2) Melanoma: Questions and Answers psychoeducational booklet, and (3) three or five psychotherapeutic telehealth sessions. This longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot implementation study aims to recruit 108 patients previously diagnosed with stage 0-II melanoma. The primary effectiveness outcome is change in FCR severity over time. Secondary effectiveness outcomes include change in anxiety, depression, stress, health-related quality of life and melanoma-related knowledge over time. All outcomes are measured at baseline, within 1 week of the final telehealth session, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention. Implementation stakeholders at each study site and interested patients will provide feedback on intervention acceptability and appropriateness. Implementation stakeholders will also provide feedback on intervention cost, feasibility, fidelity and sustainability. These outcomes will be measured throughout implementation, using questionnaires and semistructured interviews/expert group discussions. Descriptive statistics, linear mixed-effects regression and thematic analysis will be used to analyse study data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was granted by the Sydney Local Health District-Royal Prince Alfred Zone (2020/ETH02518), protocol number: X20-0495. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, social media and result summaries distributed to interested participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: (ACTRN12621000145808).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake R Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrea L Smith
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadine A Kasparian
- Cincinnati Children's Center for Heart Disease and Mental Health, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Robyn Pm Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mbathio Dieng
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Linda Seaman
- Consumer Representative, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Linda K Martin
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Donna Milne
- Melanoma and Skin Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Schmid
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Iris Bartula
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Park SY, Lim JW. Cognitive behavioral therapy for reducing fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:217. [PMID: 35227244 PMCID: PMC8883021 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08909-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) has been addressed as a cause of emotional distress among breast cancer survivors (BCSs). This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) designed to reduce FCR among BCSs. METHODS A systematic review of published original research articles meeting the inclusion criteria was conducted. Five electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, were independently searched to identify relevant articles. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the eligible studies. RESULTS Through a database search and a manual review process, seventeen quantitative studies with an RCT study design were included in the current systematic review. The interventions varied greatly in length and intensity, but the study designs and methodologies were similar. RCTs with face-to-face interventions of at least 1 month seemed to be more effective in reducing FCR outcomes and complying with than the CONSORT 2010 criteria than those with a brief online or telephone format of interventions; nevertheless, most RCT interventions appeared to be effective. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the importance of conducting well-designed CBT interventions to reduce FCR in BCSs with diverse populations at multiple sites, thereby improving the quality of research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So-Young Park
- Ewha Institute for Age Integration Research, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Sedaemun-gu, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Won Lim
- College of Social Welfare, Kangnam University, 40 Kangnam-Ro, Giheung-Gu, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 16979, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Otto AK, Soriano EC, LoSavio ST, Siegel SD, Perndorfer C, Fenech AL, Laurenceau J. The longitudinal course of emotional and cognitive factors of fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer patients and their partners. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1221-1229. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy K. Otto
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences University of Delaware Newark DE
| | - Emily C. Soriano
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences University of Delaware Newark DE
| | - Stefanie T. LoSavio
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Duke University Medical Center Durham NC
| | - Scott D. Siegel
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute Christiana Care Health System Newark DE
| | | | - Alyssa L. Fenech
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences University of Delaware Newark DE
| | - Jean‐Philippe Laurenceau
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences University of Delaware Newark DE
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute Christiana Care Health System Newark DE
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Petricone-Westwood D, Stragapede E, Galica J, Hales S, Lebel S. An Investigation of Fear of Recurrence, Attachment and Caregiving Experiences among Ovarian Cancer Partner-Caregivers. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1136-1143. [PMID: 35137486 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common concern for both cancer patients and their caregivers. Attachment insecurity is an established contributor to poorer mental health, particularly as it relates to social support. This study sought to evaluate whether attachment and caregiver experiences in cancer care were predictors of FCR. METHODS A cross-sectional questionnaire study involving partner-caregivers of patients with ovarian cancer was conducted. Correlation analyses and multiple hierarchical regressions were used to determine the roles of attachment and caregiving experiences in cancer care on FCR, including the possible moderating role of attachment on the relationship between caregiving experiences and FCR. RESULTS Participants (n=82) mostly identified as white men, had post-secondary education and incomes of over $100,000 CAD, and cared for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Forty percent of participants had clinically elevated FCR. Among the evaluated caregiving experiences in cancer care, caregiving workload (r=0.33; p=0.005), needing more help from healthcare providers (r=0.28; p=0.02), and lacking time for social relations because of caregiving (r=0.47; p<0.001) correlated with FCR. Attachment anxiety correlated significantly with FCR (r=0.43; p<0.001), but attachment avoidance did not. Attachment anxiety (ΔR2 =0.14; p=0.002) and lacking time for social relations (ΔR2 =0.18; p<0.001) contributed to the variance on FCR. Attachment insecurity did not moderate the relationships between caregiving experiences and FCR. CONCLUSIONS Partner-caregiver attachment anxiety correlates with FCR however this does not influence FCR's relationship with poorer perceived support from cancer care institutions. Partner-caregivers may benefit from psychotherapies for FCR and more practical support from cancer care teams. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jacqueline Galica
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - Sarah Hales
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Sophie Lebel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Hall DL, Yeh GY, O'Cleirigh C, Peppercorn J, Wagner LI, Denninger J, Bullock AJ, Mizrach HR, Goshe B, Cheung T, Li R, Markowitz A, Park ER. A Multi-step Approach to Adapting a Mind-Body Resiliency Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Uncertainty in Survivorship (IN FOCUS). Glob Adv Health Med 2022; 11:21649561221074690. [PMID: 35237466 PMCID: PMC8883302 DOI: 10.1177/21649561221074690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For cancer survivors, there is a paucity of fear of recurrence (FOR) interventions that integrate empirically supported mind-body and psychological skills for managing FOR and are delivered in scalable formats. OBJECTIVE To adapt an evidence-based resiliency intervention to address FOR among cancer survivors. METHODS A multidisciplinary team of researchers, clinicians, and patient stakeholders followed an iterative intervention adaptation process (ORBIT). In Step 1, we sought to define key FOR management skills through a literature review and feedback from stakeholders. In Step 2, we integrated findings into a treatment manual and refined procedures for in-person delivery to groups of cancer survivors, defined as adults who had completed primary cancer treatment for non-metastatic cancer. In Step 3, we conducted a single arm trial to assess initial acceptability and change in FOR severity with 23 cancer survivors (N=4 intervention groups). In Step 4, we conducted additional qualitative interviews with 28 cancer survivors (N=6 focus groups stratified by FOR severity, N=15 individual interviews) to define adaptive and maladaptive strategies for coping with FOR and to identify preferences for delivery. In Step 5, we refined the treatment manual and procedures for testing in a future pilot randomized feasibility trial. RESULTS We identified critical feedback using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. The single arm trial suggested preliminary feasibility and sustained reductions in FOR severity, yet need for refinement (i.e., eligibility, delivery modality), prompting additional qualitative interviews for further targeting. The resulting intervention (IN FOCUS) is comprised of virtual, synchronous, group-delivered sessions that offer an integrated approach to FOR management by teaching cognitive-behavioral techniques, meditation, relaxation training, adaptive health behaviors, and positive psychology skills. Sessions are targeted by applying skills to FOR and associated healthcare engagement. CONCLUSIONS IN FOCUS is a targeted intervention for teaching mind-body resiliency skills to groups of cancer survivors with elevated FOR. Next steps are testing feasibility in a pilot randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L. Hall
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Daniel L. Hall, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Gloria Y. Yeh
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Conall O'Cleirigh
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Wake Forest University and the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - John Denninger
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea J. Bullock
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen R. Mizrach
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brett Goshe
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tina Cheung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raissa Li
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Elyse R. Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Henry G, Butow P, Juraskova I, Laidsaar-Powell R, Shaw J. Measuring female breast cancer survivors' concerns about late effects of treatment: initial development of the Concerns about Late Effects in Oncology Questionnaire (CLEO). Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3563-3572. [PMID: 35022883 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06740-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE While an increasing number of women are surviving breast cancer, survivors remain at risk of developing late effects. Late effects are long-term side effects which may emerge months to years after completing active treatment. Survivors may experience chronic worry and concern about the unpredictable and debilitating nature of late effects. This qualitative study aimed to explore the content validity of items included in the first patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to quantify survivors' concerns about late effects: the Concerns about Late Effects in Oncology Questionnaire (CLEO). METHOD Items included in the CLEO were informed by a literature review and consultation with expert stakeholders. Breast cancer survivors completed "think aloud" interviews to explore the perceived acceptability, relevance, clarity, and feasibility of the CLEO. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS Twenty-eight participants were interviewed. Participants indicated the CLEO was acceptable, relevant to women's experiences of late effects, and easy to use and understand. Of the 55 proposed items, participants endorsed 33 items across six domains and suggested to include one additional item. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest the CLEO captured concerns relevant to breast cancer survivors and provides initial validation of items for inclusion in the CLEO. The CLEO may improve communication about late effects in clinical settings and prompt future research into evidence-based interventions for survivors. Future research should assess the relevance of the CLEO items to other cancer populations. The psychometric properties of the CLEO will be evaluated in future stages of questionnaire development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Henry
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Bld 39Z Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Bld 39Z Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Bld 39Z Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Bld 39Z Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Bld 39Z Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Livingston PM, Russell L, Orellana L, Winter N, Jefford M, Girgis A, Austin D, O E, Mihalopoulos C, Ugalde A, Chambers R, Phipps-Nelson J, Herath D, Botti M, Rasmussen B, Whitfield K, Ftanou M, Smith AB, Pilatti K, Sara S, Wootten A, Gillan K, Singh M, Campbell D, Pillay B, White V. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online mindfulness program (MindOnLine) to reduce fear of recurrence among people with cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057212. [PMID: 35022179 PMCID: PMC8756286 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common condition among cancer survivors that can lead to significant levels of distress, anxiety and depression. Online mindfulness programmes may provide the mechanism to support cancer survivors manage FCR and distress, and improve people's well-being over the short, medium and long term. The primary aim of this study is to determine the potential efficacy of MindOnLine, a 9 session mindfulness-based programme for survivors of breast, prostate and colorectal cancer. A formal economic programme will also be conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A single-blind randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy and cost-efficacy of a MindOnLine programme for cancer survivors. A total of 400 people living with cancer will be recruited via online advertisements on social media platforms, peak consumer advocacy groups or through outpatient services at healthcare providers across Victoria, Australia. People will be randomly allocated to either the MindOnLine programme (n=200) or waitlist control (n=200). Participant assessments will occur at baseline, at 9 weeks and 9-month follow-up. The primary outcome is change in Fear of Recurrence Index Score total score between baseline and 9 weeks; secondary outcomes are changes in depression and anxiety, quality of life and mindfulness. The economic analysis comprises a cost-consequences analysis where all outcomes will be compared with costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (20-53) and Deakin University (2020-284). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer reviewed journals and among key stakeholder organisations including hospitals, cancer and community organisations and Government. If successful the project will be rolled out nationally with a formal implementation plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12620000645954); Pre-results. Registered 6 June 2020, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379520&isReview=true.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia M Livingston
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lahiru Russell
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liliana Orellana
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Winter
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Liverpool BC, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Austin
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eric O
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard Chambers
- Centre for Contemplative & Consciousness Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jo Phipps-Nelson
- Health Services Research & Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dishan Herath
- Cancer Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mari Botti
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bodil Rasmussen
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn Whitfield
- Cancer Support Treatment and Research Unit; Community Based Health Services; Commissioning and System Improvement, Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Ftanou
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allan Ben Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Liverpool BC, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten Pilatti
- Breast Cancer Network Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sally Sara
- Nursing Programs, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Kate Gillan
- Clinical Services, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Madhu Singh
- Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Barwon Health, University Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Campbell
- Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Barwon Health, University Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brindha Pillay
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Tutelman PR, Chambers CT, Heathcote LC, Fernandez CV, Flanders A, Patton M, Schulte FSM, Guilcher GMT, Simard S, MacLeod J, Stern M. Measuring Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Development and Preliminary Validation of the FCRI-Child and FCRI-Parent Versions. Psychooncology 2022; 31:911-919. [PMID: 35018689 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common and distressing psychosocial concern for adult cancer survivors. Data on this construct in child survivors is limited and there are no validated measures for this population. This study aimed to adapt the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF) for survivors of childhood cancer aged 8-18 years (FCRI-C) and their parents (FCRI-P) to self-report on their own FCR and to examine the initial psychometric properties. METHODS The FCRI-SF was adapted through expert panel input and cognitive interviews with child survivors <18 years. The factor structure, internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the FCRI-C and FCRI-P were examined in 124 survivors of childhood cancer (43% female; Mage =14.58 years, SD=2.90) and 106 parents (90% mothers). RESULTS All FCRI-SF items were retained for the FCRI-C with simplified language. The internal consistencies of the FCRI-C (α= .88) and FCRI-P (α= .83) were good. Exploratory factor analyses yielded one-factor structures for both measures. Higher scores on the FCRI-C and FCRI-P were associated with greater intolerance of uncertainty and pain catastrophizing. Higher child FCR was also related to more hypervigilance to bodily symptoms. Parents with higher FCR reported contacting their child's doctors and nurses and scheduling medical appointments for their child more frequently. Children reported significantly lower FCR compared to parents. CONCLUSIONS The FCRI-C and FCRI-P demonstrated strong reliability and preliminary validity. This study offers preliminary data to support the use of the FCRI-C and FCRI-P to measure FCR in survivors of childhood cancer aged 8-18 years and their parents. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perri R Tutelman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Christine T Chambers
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lauren C Heathcote
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Conrad V Fernandez
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Annette Flanders
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Michaela Patton
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fiona S M Schulte
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Haematology, Oncology and Transplant Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregory M T Guilcher
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Haematology, Oncology and Transplant Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sébastien Simard
- Department of Health Sciences, Centre intersectoriel en santé durable (CIUSD), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Maya Stern
- Patient Partner, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Wei L, Yang X, Sun S, Yu Y, Xie J, Zhao J, Wang X, Zhu L, Yao J. Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy for young breast cancer patients' fear of cancer recurrence: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:941459. [PMID: 36213912 PMCID: PMC9537371 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.941459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, there are a growing number of young women being diagnosed with breast cancer. Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) has become one of the major psychological concerns reported by young breast cancer patients. Yet, there is a lack of psychological intervention tailored for reducing FCR for Chinese young breast cancer patients. In the current study, the Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy is developed to help Chinese young breast cancer patients to manage FCR. The therapy was developed based on FCR development theories and self-compassion related therapy. The primary objective is to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy. The secondary objective is to examine the underlying mechanisms of therapy in reducing FCR in young breast cancer patients. METHODS The Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy consists of 8-week face to face group sessions. This study will be a randomized controlled trial with 160 Chinese young female breast cancer patients with severe FCR. Participants will be randomized to the therapy group or a usual care control group (1:1). Measurements will be completed at baseline, immediately completing intervention, 3, 6, and 12 months later. Primary outcomes are FCR severity, and secondary outcomes include symptoms of depression and anxiety, satisfaction with therapy, and cost-effectiveness of the therapy. DISCUSSION If successful, this study will provide an effective psychological intervention to treat FCR for young breast cancer patients in China, and illuminate the underlying mechanisms of the Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy in reducing FCR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04965428. Registered 23rd July 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04965428?cond=fear+of+cancer+recurrence&draw=2&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liuyu Wei
- School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaomin Yang
- Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Shasha Sun
- School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yunlei Yu
- School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Juan Xie
- Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Jiang Zhao
- Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Lei Zhu
- School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Juntao Yao
- Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Rosenberg J, Butow PN, Shaw JM. The untold story of late effects: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer survivors' emotional responses to late effects. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:177-185. [PMID: 34245359 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06402-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, called late effects, years after the completion of active treatment. Late effects can significantly impair physical functioning. The current study aimed to explore breast cancer survivors' experiences of late effects, their emotional responses to existing or potential late effects and their perceived impact. METHODS A total of 36 women treated for breast cancer in the last 10 years participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Participant views were sought with respect to knowledge, experience, and perceived longer-term risk. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Four themes emerged from the data: (1) late effects awareness, (2) framing and coping, (3) uncertainty and (4) management. There was a range of emotional responses to late effects; however, many participants reported being unaware of their risk of late effects. Participants conceptualised late effects as any long-term effect of treatment regardless of the time of onset. Women reported living with constant uncertainty and feared cancer recurrence. Many were focused on managing long-term treatment side effects, rather than late effects. CONCLUSION Many women undergo treatment and remain unaware of associated late effect risks. National guidelines recommend patients be informed about late effects; however, the results of this study suggest a gap between policy and practice. Evidence-based interventions are needed to equip women with strategies to physically and emotionally manage late effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie Rosenberg
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne M Shaw
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Ackermann DM, Dieng M, Medcalf E, Jenkins MC, van Kemenade CH, Janda M, Turner RM, Cust AE, Morton RL, Irwig L, Guitera P, Soyer HP, Mar V, Hersch JK, Low D, Low C, Saw RPM, Scolyer RA, Drabarek D, Espinoza D, Azzi A, Lilleyman AM, Smit AK, Murchie P, Thompson JF, Bell KJL. Assessing the Potential for Patient-led Surveillance After Treatment of Localized Melanoma (MEL-SELF): A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:33-42. [PMID: 34817543 PMCID: PMC8771298 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patient-led surveillance is a promising new model of follow-up care following excision of localized melanoma. OBJECTIVE To determine whether patient-led surveillance in patients with prior localized primary cutaneous melanoma is as safe, feasible, and acceptable as clinician-led surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a pilot for a randomized clinical trial at 2 specialist-led clinics in metropolitan Sydney, Australia, and a primary care skin cancer clinic managed by general practitioners in metropolitan Newcastle, Australia. The participants were 100 patients who had been treated for localized melanoma, owned a smartphone, had a partner to assist with skin self-examination (SSE), and had been routinely attending scheduled follow-up visits. The study was conducted from November 1, 2018, to January 17, 2020, with analysis performed from September 1, 2020, to November 15, 2020. INTERVENTION Participants were randomized (1:1) to 6 months of patient-led surveillance (the intervention comprised usual care plus reminders to perform SSE, patient-performed dermoscopy, teledermatologist assessment, and fast-tracked unscheduled clinic visits) or clinician-led surveillance (the control was usual care). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible and contacted patients who were randomized. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (eg, SSE knowledge, attitudes, and practices, psychological outcomes, other health care use) and clinical outcomes (eg, clinic visits, skin surgeries, subsequent new primary or recurrent melanoma). RESULTS Of 326 patients who were eligible and contacted, 100 (31%) patients (mean [SD] age, 58.7 [12.0] years; 53 [53%] men) were randomized to patient-led (n = 49) or clinician-led (n = 51) surveillance. Data were available on patient-reported outcomes for 66 participants and on clinical outcomes for 100 participants. Compared with clinician-led surveillance, patient-led surveillance was associated with increased SSE frequency (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% CI, 0.9 to 14.0) and thoroughness (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 5.7), had no detectable adverse effect on psychological outcomes (fear of cancer recurrence subscale score; mean difference, -1.3; 95% CI, -3.1 to 0.5), and increased clinic visits (risk ratio [RR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.1), skin lesion excisions (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0), and subsequent melanoma diagnoses and subsequent melanoma diagnoses (risk difference, 10%; 95% CI, -2% to 23%). New primary melanomas and 1 local recurrence were diagnosed in 8 (16%) of the participants in the intervention group, including 5 (10%) ahead of routinely scheduled visits; and in 3 (6%) of the participants in the control group, with none (0%) ahead of routinely scheduled visits (risk difference, 10%; 95% CI, 2% to 19%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This pilot of a randomized clinical trial found that patient-led surveillance after treatment of localized melanoma appears to be safe, feasible, and acceptable. Experiences from this pilot study have prompted improvements to the trial processes for the larger trial of the same intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001716459.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deonna M. Ackermann
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mbathio Dieng
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ellie Medcalf
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marisa C. Jenkins
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robin M. Turner
- Biostatistics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| | - Anne E. Cust
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael L. Morton
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Les Irwig
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - H. Peter Soyer
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Victoria Mar
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jolyn K. Hersch
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Donald Low
- Cancer Voices New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cynthia Low
- Cancer Voices New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn P. M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dorothy Drabarek
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Espinoza
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Azzi
- Newcastle Skin Check, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Amelia K. Smit
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Murchie
- Academic Primary Care Research Group, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katy J. L. Bell
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Pradhan P, Sharpe L, Menzies RE. Towards a Stepped Care Model for Managing Fear of Cancer Recurrence or Progression in Cancer Survivors. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:8953-8965. [PMID: 34880676 PMCID: PMC8645945 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s294114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fear of cancer recurrence or progression (FCR) is common amongst cancer survivors and an important minority develop clinically significant levels of FCR. However, it is unclear how current clinical services might best support the growing numbers of cancer survivors. Purpose The aim of this study is to develop recommendations for future research in the management of FCR and propose a model of care to help manage FCR in the growing population of cancer survivors. Methods This is a narrative review and synthesis of empirical research relevant to managing FCR. We reviewed meta-analyses, systematic reviews and individual studies that had investigated interventions for FCR. Results A recent, well-conducted meta-analysis confirmed a range of moderately effective treatments for FCR. However, many survivors continued to experience clinical levels of FCR after treatment, indicating a clear need to improve the gold standard treatments. Accessibility of interventions is arguably a greater concern. The majority of FCR treatments require face-to-face therapy, with highly skilled psycho-oncologists to produce moderate changes in FCR. With increasing numbers of cancer survivors, we need to consider how to meet the unmet need of cancer survivors in relation to FCR. Although there have been attempts to develop minimal interventions, these are not yet sufficiently well supported to warrant implementation. Attempts to help clinicians to provide information which might prevent the development of clinically significant FCR have shown some early promise, but research is needed to confirm efficacy. Conclusion The next decade of research needs to focus on developing preventative approaches for FCR, and minimal interventions for those with mild-to-moderate symptoms. When evidence-based approaches to prevent FCR or manage moderate levels of FCR are available, stepped care approaches that could meet the needs of survivors could be implemented. However, we also need to improve existing interventions for severe FCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poorva Pradhan
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Rachel E Menzies
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Tuman M, Roberts KE, Corner G, Beard C, Fadalla C, Coats T, Slivjak E, Schofield E, Lichtenthal WG. Interpretation Bias in Breast Cancer Survivors Experiencing Fear of Cancer Recurrence. Front Psychol 2021; 12:682174. [PMID: 34867579 PMCID: PMC8636426 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a prevalent and persistent challenge that many cancer survivors endure. While the role of interpretation bias, a tendency to perceive ambiguous situations as threatening, has been established in the onset and maintenance of FCR, few studies have examined cancer-related interpretation bias specifically. Grounded in the cognitive formulation of FCR, the current study aimed to fill this gap by investigating the relationship between cancer-related interpretation bias, FCR, and somatic symptoms, and examining whether bias mediates the relationship between somatic symptoms and FCR. Materials and Methods: This study used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive bias modification intervention. Breast cancer survivors (n = 110) provided demographic and medical background information as well as self-report measures of FCR and severity of somatic symptoms. A computer-based assessment of interpretation bias was used to measure cancer-related interpretation bias on several bias indices: percentage of cancer-related threat endorsement, and percentage of benign endorsement; mean reaction time (RT) for threat, and mean RT for benign endorsement. Results: Higher threat endorsement was linked to higher Overall Fear and emerged as a mediator of the relationship between overall somatic symptoms and Overall Fear. We also found that older age was related to longer benign endorsement RT. Conclusion: This study contributes understanding of factors related to cancer-related interpretation bias and provides evidence that bias may influence the relationship between somatic symptoms and FCR in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malwina Tuman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kailey E Roberts
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Geoffrey Corner
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Courtney Beard
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Carol Fadalla
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Taylor Coats
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Elizabeth Slivjak
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wendy G Lichtenthal
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
A systematic mixed studies review of fear of cancer recurrence in families and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 16:1184-1219. [PMID: 34762248 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01109-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) may be equally prevalent, persistent and burdensome in cancer caregivers as in survivors. This systematic review evaluated FCR prevalence, severity, correlates, course, impact and interventions in cancer caregivers. METHODS Electronic databases were searched from 1997 to May 2021. Two reviewers identified eligible peer-reviewed qualitative or quantitative studies on FCR in adult caregivers or family members of adult cancer survivors. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools for randomised and non-randomised studies and the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis and thematic synthesis occurred on quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively. RESULTS Of 2418 papers identified, 70 reports (59 peer-reviewed articles, 11 postgraduate theses) from 63 studies were included. Approximately 50% of caregivers experienced FCR. Younger caregivers and those caring for survivors with worse FCR or overall health reported higher FCR. Most studies found caregivers' FCR levels were equal to or greater than survivors'. Caregivers' FCR was persistently elevated but peaked approaching survivor follow-up appointments. Caregivers' FCR was associated with poorer quality of life in caregivers and survivors. Three studies found couple-based FCR interventions were acceptable, but had limited efficacy. CONCLUSIONS FCR in caregivers is prevalent, persistent and burdensome. Younger caregivers of survivors with worse overall health or FCR are at the greatest risk. Further research on identifying and treating caregivers' FCR is required. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Caregiver and survivor FCR are similarly impactful and appear interrelated. Addressing FCR may improve outcomes for both cancer caregivers and survivors.
Collapse
|
118
|
Cohen PA, Musiello T, Jeffares S, Bennett K. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for Fear of Recurrence in Ovarian Cancer Survivors (FROCS): a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2317-2325. [PMID: 34727225 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06659-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fear of recurrence is common following treatment for cancer. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) to treat fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in ovarian cancer survivors. METHODS Investigator initiated, single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Women were eligible after completing adjuvant treatment. The intervention was an 8-week MBCT course of weekly 2-h group sessions. The primary outcome was FCR measured by the FCR inventory. Secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The study is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000213549. RESULTS Between May 8, 2015, and May 6, 2019, 33 participants were enrolled. Ten women withdrew. Data were evaluable for 19 participants. There was a significant decrease in FCR at 8 weeks (FCR inventory mean 63.00, SD 27.90) compared to pre-intervention (FCR inventory mean 71.03, SD 31.01) but not at 6 months (FCR inventory mean 63.65, SD 30.08). No differences in depression were observed at baseline (HADS mean 3.42, SD 2.41), 8 weeks (HADS mean 3.10, SD 1.79) and 6 months (HADS mean 2.73, SD 1.88). Anxiety decreased from baseline (HADS mean 8.72, SD 3.99) at both 8 weeks (HADS mean 6.89, SD 2.98) and 6 months (HADS mean 7.06, SD 3.87). CONCLUSIONS MBCT may be effective as a treatment for FCR and anxiety in women following diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. A randomised controlled trial is required to assess the efficacy of MBCT for FCR but may not be feasible due to high rates of withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Cohen
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
- Dept of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Hospital, 12 Salvado Road, Subiaco, WA, 6008, Australia.
| | - Toni Musiello
- Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Stephanie Jeffares
- Dept of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Hospital, 12 Salvado Road, Subiaco, WA, 6008, Australia
| | - Kellie Bennett
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Reproductive concerns and fear of cancer recurrence: a qualitative study of women's experiences of the perinatal period after cancer. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:738. [PMID: 34717568 PMCID: PMC8556905 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04208-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Young female cancer survivors are at a disproportionate risk of suffering significant psychological distress following treatment, particularly fears of cancer recurrence (FCR). While previous research has established the robust relationship between FCR and family matters (e.g., family planning and motherhood), there is a paucity of information about how a history of cancer affects women’s psychological functioning throughout the perinatal period. The present investigation sought to better understand women’s experiences of pregnancy and the postpartum period following cancer treatment through a qualitative analysis. Methods Ten women participated in a semi-structured, one-on-one interview either over telephone or video conferencing (Zoom). Women were recruited from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, as well as through online cancer support platforms, and social media sites. Participants all had a past cancer diagnosis; no active disease; were 45-years of age or younger; currently in the perinatal period; and spoke English fluently. The study employed a grounded theory analysis by which verbatim interview data were analysed using a constant comparison method until data saturation was reached. Results The qualitative analysis yielded I’m So Happy, But Also Terrified, as the core category, indicative of the duality of emotional experience that characterized the perinatal period for these women. Additionally, four higher-order categories emerged revealing how women go through a process of grief related to potential fertility loss; conditional joy during and after pregnancy due to the lingering weight of cancer; frustration with a lack of resources regarding perinatal health after cancer; and hope as they enter into motherhood. Conclusion These results suggest that women in the perinatal period with a history of cancer may be at an increased risk for psychological distress and require additional fertility and reproductive resources both during and after cancer treatment. This research is an important step in further understanding women’s experiences of pregnancy after cancer and may help to inform future research and healthcare practices, in addition to improving perinatal care after cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04208-3.
Collapse
|
120
|
Arthuso FZ, Fairey AS, Boulé NG, Courneya KS. Bladder cancer and exeRcise trAining during intraVesical thErapy-the BRAVE trial: a study protocol for a prospective, single-centre, phase II randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055782. [PMID: 34561265 PMCID: PMC8475156 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for about 75% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers. The treatment for NMIBC involves surgical removal of the tumour followed by 6 weekly instillations of immunotherapy or chemotherapy directly into the bladder (ie, intravesical therapy). NMIBC has a high rate of recurrence (31%-78%) and progression (15%). Moreover, bladder cancer and its treatment may affect patient functioning and quality of life. Exercise is a safe and effective intervention for many patient with cancer groups, however, no studies have examined exercise during intravesical therapy for NMIBC. The primary objective of the Bladder cancer and exeRcise trAining during intraVesical thErapy (BRAVE) trial is to examine the safety and feasibility of an exercise intervention in patients with bladder cancer undergoing intravesical therapy. The secondary objectives are to investigate the preliminary efficacy of exercise on health-related fitness and patient-reported outcomes; examine the social cognitive predictors of exercise adherence; and explore the potential effects of exercise on tumour recurrence and progression. METHODS AND ANALYSIS BRAVE is a phase II randomised controlled trial that aims to include 66 patients with NMIBC scheduled to receive intravesical therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to the exercise intervention or usual care. The intervention consists of three supervised, high-intensity interval training sessions per week for 12 weeks. Feasibility will be evaluated by eligibility, recruitment, adherence and attrition rates. Preliminary efficacy will focus on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and patient-reported outcomes from baseline (prior to intravesical therapy) to pre-cystoscopy (3 months). Cancer outcomes will be tracked at 3 months, and 1-year follow-up by cystoscopy. Analysis of covariance will compare between-group differences at post-intervention (pre-cystoscopy) for all health-related fitness and patient-reported outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta-Cancer Committee (#20-0184). Dissemination will include publication and presentations at scientific conferences and public channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04593862; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Z Arthuso
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adrian S Fairey
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Normand G Boulé
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most common and aversive psychological phenomena among cancer survivors. Understanding the independent and potentially modifiable risk factors that contribute toward FCR seen in cancer survivors would inform future interventional trials aimed at reducing this risk. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide an evidence synthesis of factors correlated with FCR to inform the development of preventive interventions. METHODS A literature search was performed of the PsycINFO, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (PubMed) databases. Reports published from inception to 2020 focusing on the correlates of FCR with physical, psychological, and social factors were identified. Authors assessed the studies' risk of bias in accordance with the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Quantitative Studies (QualSyst criteria) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. After extracting data and assessing the quality of the included studies, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS Thirty-four articles were included in this study with a total sample of more than 13 000 cancer patients. Fear of cancer recurrence was positively correlated with anxiety, depression, avoidance, chemotherapy, distress, intrusive thoughts, fatigue, rumination, and neuroticism. It was negatively correlated with optimism, age, social support, quality of life, time since diagnosis, well-being, and self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS We identified 16 factors that are correlated with FCR, 9 positively correlated with FCR and 7 negatively correlated with FCR. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The findings of this study provide direction for the development of precise interventions for FCR in cancer survivors and lay the foundation for the further construction of an FCR-related nursing theoretical framework.
Collapse
|
122
|
Hovdenak Jakobsen I, Vind Thaysen H, Laurberg S, Johansen C, Juul T. Patient-led follow-up reduces outpatient doctor visits and improves patient satisfaction. One-year analysis of secondary outcomes in the randomised trial Follow-Up after Rectal CAncer (FURCA). Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1130-1139. [PMID: 34238100 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1950924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND FURCA (Follow-Up after Rectal Cancer) is a multi-centre randomised trial comparing patient-led follow-up with standard outpatient follow-up. This paper reports one-year follow-up data from the FURCA trial on selected secondary outcomes including type and number of contacts, patient-reported involvement and satisfaction with health care services during follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with rectal cancer (stage < IV) from four Danish surgical centres were randomised (1:1) into intervention (education and self-referral to project nurse) or standard follow-up (routine clinical doctor visits). The present analysis involved data on hospital contacts during the first year after surgery, patient involvement and satisfaction measured at one year, and baseline patient-reported and clinical variables. RESULTS Of 512 eligible patients, 168 were allocated to patient-led follow-up (intervention) and 168 to standard follow-up (control). The total number of hospital contacts in the intervention arm did not differ significantly from the number of contacts in the control arm (p = 0.44). More patients had ≥15 contacts in the intervention arm than in the control arm (p = 0.004). The total number of outpatient doctor visits was significantly lower in the intervention arm (p < 0.001). Patients in both arms rated involvement and satisfaction high; yet patients in the intervention arm scored significantly higher on two of six items regarding involvement and all five items regarding satisfaction. Of the 168 patients in the intervention arm, 43% made direct contact (self-referral) to the project nurse, and 14 of these patients (8%) had ≥4 contacts. The primary reason for self-referral was bowel dysfunction. DISCUSSION The findings indicate the value of a patient-led follow-up program in terms of direct access and more individually tailored intervention based on patients' needs, with most tasks being managed by nurses. Patient-led follow-up came with improved patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction; thus, it was both acceptable and favourable for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Late Effect Research Unit, Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
123
|
Dinkel A, Marten-Mittag B, Kremsreiter K. Association Between Daily Worry, Pathological Worry, and Fear of Progression in Patients With Cancer. Front Psychol 2021; 12:648623. [PMID: 34456783 PMCID: PMC8384960 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fear of progression (FoP), or fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), is characterized by worries or concerns about negative illness-related future events. Actually, to worry is a common cognitive process that, in its non-pathological form, belongs to daily life. However, worry can also become pathological appearing as a symptom of mental disorders. This study aimed at investigating the associations among daily worry, pathological worry, and FoP in patients with cancer. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that includes 328 hospitalized patients with cancer. Patients filled out the FoP Questionnaire (FoP-Q), the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ) for the assessment of daily worry, and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) for the assessment of pathological worry. Depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were measured with modules of the Patient Health Questionnaire [Patient Health Questionnaire-Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-2), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2), and Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic Symptoms (PHQ-15)]. Furthermore, a structured clinical interview was conducted for the assessment of anxiety disorders. The hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with FoP. Results: Mean age of the participants was M = 58.5 years (SD = 12.8), and 64.6% were men. FoP and worry were significantly intercorrelated (r = 0.58–0.78). The level of FoP was most strongly associated with daily worry (β = 0.514, p < 0.001), followed by pathological worry (β = 0.221, p < 0.001). Further significant determinants were younger age and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Clinical variables were not independently associated with FoP. The final model explained 74% of the variance. Discussion: Fear of progression is strongly associated with daily worry and pathological worry. These results bring up the question of whether FoP is an expression of a general tendency to worry. Whether a general tendency to worry, in fact, represents an independent vulnerability factor for experiencing FCR/FoP needs to be investigated in a longitudinal research design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Birgitt Marten-Mittag
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katrin Kremsreiter
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Fear, worry and sadness: an exploratory study of psychological wellbeing in men caring for their partner with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:825-833. [PMID: 34389907 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06488-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from female cancers in Australia with the majority of women presenting with advanced disease. The burden of caregiving is largely borne by male carers; however, little research has examined the challenges male ovarian cancer caregivers (MOCC) experience. This study aimed to explore the psychosocial wellbeing and cancer-related challenges experienced by MOCC. METHODS A cross-sectional small-scale exploratory online survey study recruited 36 MOCC. The study questionnaire was comprised of the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Module (PHQ-9), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale (FACT-G) Family Member, Fear of Cancer Recurrence Scale, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACTIT-F) and Cancer-Related Challenges Scale (CRCS). RESULTS The most common challenges ever experienced were worry about the future (91%), fear of metastasis (90%) and feeling worried or uncertain (88%). The most common current challenges were fear of cancer recurrence (75%), fear of metastasis (68%) and changes in sexual relationships (64%). Depression and anxiety were significantly correlated with all psychosocial variables highlighting the relationships between elements of wellbeing for MOCC. Clinical levels of fear of cancer recurrence were reported by 89% of MOCC. CONCLUSIONS The challenges faced by MOCC are psychosocial in nature. There is a high correlation between anxiety and depression, and this coupled with the fear of disease recurrence indicates a greater need for screening of these issues, appropriate referral and development of support resources for this high-risk group of cancer carers.
Collapse
|
125
|
Martino ML, Lemmo D, Gargiulo A. A review of psychological impact of breast cancer in women below 50 years old. Health Care Women Int 2021; 42:1066-1085. [PMID: 34357855 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1901901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
A breast cancer diagnosis is a critical event with a potentially traumatic nature. In recent years there has been an increase of this illness in women aged under-fifty, a group of particular scientific interest. In this article the authors review the recent scientific literature on psychological impact of breast cancer experiences in under-50 women. Our results highlight three trajectories: clinical psychological risks; feminine-specific concerns; resources between individual and relational aspects. This overview illustrates the complexity of the effects of breast cancer in under-50women allowing to think about theoretical and psychosocial models to provide support for under-50 women during the illness experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Luisa Martino
- Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Lemmo
- Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Gargiulo
- Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Rauff Søndergaard S, Ellekjær LB, Bechmann T, Offersen BV, Nielsen MH, Møller M, Berry LL, Zachariae R, Dahl Steffensen K. Shared decision making with breast cancer patients: impact on patient engagement and fear of recurrence. Protocol for a Danish randomized trial in radiotherapy (DBCG RT SDM). Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1032-1037. [PMID: 34010102 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1921261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Rauff Søndergaard
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Louise Baad Ellekjær
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Troels Bechmann
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mette Møller
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Robert Zachariae
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Tauber NM, Zachariae R, Jensen AB, Thewes B, Skyt I, Elkjaer E, Butow PN, O'Toole MS. ConquerFear-group: Feasibility study with pilot results of a psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence delivered in groups. Psychooncology 2021; 31:30-38. [PMID: 34289212 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ConquerFear has been found to effectively reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Group interventions may be particularly effective for the treatment of FCR and could lower overall costs. Our objectives were therefore to adapt ConquerFear into a group format (ConquerFear-Group, CF-G), and to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. METHODS Eligible patients had completed treatment for breast cancer 3 months to 5 years previously, were ≥18 years, and scored ≥22 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF). The manual was first evaluated with seven patients (Pilot 1), adjusted in accordance with feedback from the patients, therapists, and the original ConquerFear developers. After further evaluation with eight patients (Pilot 2), and subsequent adjustments, the preliminary efficacy of the final manual was evaluated with 27 patients, randomized in blocks to CF-G (N = 13) or active control (AC) (relaxation training) (N = 14) (Pilot 3). The primary outcome was the FCRI total score. Secondary outcomes included general distress, quality-of-life, and process outcomes pertaining to metacognitions, decentering, and worry. All measures were completed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. RESULTS Adjustments of the original ConquerFear manual (Pilot 1 and 2) included changes in the order of treatment components, simplified exercises, and shortened homework. Compared with ACs, CF-G participants reported greater reductions in FCRI total scores from baseline to post-treatment (Hedges's g = 0.59, p = 0.004), 3 months (g = 0.50, p = 0.026), and 6 months later (g = 0.93, p = 0.043). Differences corresponding to medium-to-large effect sizes (Pilot 3). Although non-significant, group differences concerning reductions in general distress and maladaptive metacognitions corresponded to small-to-medium effect sizes (g = 0.40-0.61; ps = 0.40-0.61). CONCLUSIONS CF-G appears feasible and potentially efficacious in treating FCR in a breast cancer population. These preliminary results are promising but need to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina M Tauber
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Robert Zachariae
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Breast Cancer Group Center for Late Effects (DCCL), Denmark
| | - Anders B Jensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Breast Cancer Group Center for Late Effects (DCCL), Denmark
| | - Belinda Thewes
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ina Skyt
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Emma Elkjaer
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mia S O'Toole
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Lee HR, Song YM, Jeon KH, Cho IY. The Association between the Use of Dietary Supplement and Psychological Status of Cancer Survivors in Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study. Korean J Fam Med 2021; 42:317-326. [PMID: 34320800 PMCID: PMC8321910 DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dietary supplements (DS) use is known to be common among cancer survivors. However, detailed information on the factors influencing DS use seems insufficient, including cancer-related and psychological factors. Methods Study subjects were 1,852 Korean adult cancer survivors recruited from cancer survivor clinic of two university-affiliated hospitals. Data were collected retrospectively through review of medical records and self-administered questionnaires. Psychological factors were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form. Factors associated the DS use were evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis after adjusting for covariates. Results The prevalence of long-term DS use was 15.7% in overall (17.5% in female and 11.6% in male). Female survivors were 3.14 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89–5.22) more likely to use DS than male. In male cancer survivors, ever-smoking and previous radiotherapy were positively associated with DS use. In females, breast cancer survivors were 0.32 times less likely to use DS compared with stomach cancer survivors, and survivors with family history of cancer were 1.39 times more likely to use DS than those without. After adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors, survivors with anxiety (HADS ≥8) used DS 1.38 times (95% CI, 1.01–1.91) more frequently, compared with those without anxiety. Conclusion Diverse factors such as female sex, cancer treatment modality, smoking history, family history and anxiety status were associated with DS use in Korean cancer survivors. Targeted strategies with consideration of these factors are needed for counseling DS use for cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Rim Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun-Mi Song
- Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Keun Hye Jeon
- Department of Family Medicine, CHA Gumi Medical Center, CHA University, Gumi, Korea
| | - In Young Cho
- Department of Family Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
O'Rourke L, Fisher PL, Campbell S, Wright A, Cherry MG. Factors Associated With Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Family Caregivers of Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2021; 12:625654. [PMID: 34335354 PMCID: PMC8323753 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significant concern for family caregivers of cancer survivors and is associated with many adverse outcomes, including increased emotional distress and poorer quality of life. Although several theoretical models have been proposed to account for FCR in cancer survivors, their applicability to caregivers is unknown. The aim of this review was to identify clinical, demographic and psychological factors that are associated with, and predict, FCR in caregivers of cancer survivors. Method: AMED, CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus were systematically searched for relevant studies reporting quantitative data on factors associated with FCR or similar constructs (e.g., worry or anxiety about cancer recurrence) in family caregivers of adult cancer survivors. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using a standardized checklist adapted from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Results: Sixteen studies, half of which were cross-sectional, were included and summarized narratively. Non-modifiable factors, including age (n = 6) and treatment modality (n = 4), were found to be associated with increased FCR. Significant positive associations were also reported between illness perceptions and FCR (n = 3). However, there was heterogeneity across included studies with regards to factors examined and most were conducted in the USA. There were also several methodological limitations to the included studies. Conclusions: Research examining FCR in caregivers of cancer survivors has predominantly focused on demographic and clinical factors. Given the paucity of research exploring the psychological mechanisms underpinning FCR, future research should investigate theoretical underpinnings of FCR in caregivers of cancer survivors to support the development of psychological interventions for this population. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42019119729].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise O'Rourke
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Peter L Fisher
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Clinical Health Psychology Service, Linda McCartney Centre, Liverpool University National Heath Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Campbell
- Clinical Health Psychology Service, Linda McCartney Centre, Liverpool University National Heath Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Amelia Wright
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Gemma Cherry
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Clinical Health Psychology Service, Linda McCartney Centre, Liverpool University National Heath Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Casswell G, Gough K, Drosdowsky A, Bressel M, Coleman A, Shrestha S, D'Costa I, Fua T, Tiong A, Liu C, Rischin D, McDowell L. Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Survivors of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:890-899. [PMID: 34265396 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the prevalence of and characteristics associated with fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a cross-sectional study in HPV-OPC survivors ≥12 months from completion of definitive (chemo)radiation therapy (RT/CRT). Eligible patients completed the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory short-form (FCRI-SF), the European Organisation for research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck, and PROMIS Anxiety and Depression short forms. Associations between FCRI-SF scores and other variables were investigated using linear regression models. RESULTS A total of 136 HPV-OPC survivors were enrolled; the median age was 61 years (range, 42-87 years), 84% were male, 72% were currently partnered, 83% were current nonsmokers, 67% were regular alcohol consumers, and the median time since treatment was 2.8 years (range, 1.0-5.5 years). Clinical levels of FCR (≥13) were observed in 72 of 135 patients (53%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 45%-62%). Characteristics significantly associated with increasing FCR scores were younger age (-0.9/5 years; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.01; P = .031), lower global quality of life (-0.8/10 unit increase; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.2; P = .012), higher symptom interference (0.8/unit increase; 95% CI, 0.1-1.5; P = .017), and a higher burden of anxiety (0.4/unit; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5; P <.001) and depression (0.3/unit; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4; P <.001). Other sociodemographic tumor- and treatment-related characteristics were not statistically significant. Compared with patients reporting nonclinical levels of FCR, significantly more patients reporting clinical levels of FCR than expected believed professional psychological assistance would have been beneficial (60% vs 33%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Clinical levels of FCR were observed in approximately half of the HPV-OPC survivors. Survivors reporting higher FCR were younger with worse self-reported global quality of life and higher symptom interference and emotional distress. No other patient, tumor, or treatment factors were associated with higher FCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Casswell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Cancer Experiences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of Cancer Experiences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mathias Bressel
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials (BaCT) Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Coleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sudi Shrestha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ieta D'Costa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tsien Fua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Albert Tiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Rischin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lachlan McDowell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Swainston J, Louis C, Moser J, Derakshan N. Neurocognitive efficiency in breast cancer survivorship: A performance monitoring ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol 2021; 168:9-20. [PMID: 34242661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can lead to longer term cognitive and emotional vulnerability, making the ability to efficiently adapt to setbacks critical. Whilst cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) are often reported amongst breast cancer survivors, investigation into the capacity to efficiently process errors is limited. The present study investigated the neurocognitive correlates of cognitive-control related performance monitoring, an important function influencing behavioural adjustment to mistakes. 62 participants (30 Breast Cancer Survivors, 32 Non-Cancer) completed a modified flanker task designed to challenge response inhibition as we measured neurocognitive indices of performance monitoring (ERN, the error-related negativity; CRN, the correct-response negativity; Pe, the error positivity). Findings indicated a blunted CRN and larger ∆ERN in the breast cancer survivors compared to the non-cancer group, in the absence of performance effects. This was followed by a larger Pe in the breast cancer survivors' group, indicating an exaggerated performance monitoring response. For women affected by breast cancer, findings suggest an early disrupted neural response to monitoring cognitive performance, followed by the requirement for more effortful processing in the conscious response to errors, indicating deficits in neurocognitive efficiency. These findings have important implications for developing cognitive rehabilitation programmes for breast cancer survivors affected by cognitive dysfunction to assist in the monitoring and adjustment of performance required to meet established goals in the face of adversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Swainston
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, UK.
| | - Courtney Louis
- Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, USA
| | - Jason Moser
- Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, USA
| | - Nazanin Derakshan
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Salvador Zaragozá A, Soto-Rubio A, Lacomba-Trejo L, Valero-Moreno S, Pérez-Marín M. Compassion in Spanish-speaking health care: A systematic review. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 42:6732-6751. [PMID: 34220172 PMCID: PMC8231754 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01994-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Altought compassionate care is an important factor in health care, remains an unmet need in patients. The studies have been carried out in Anglo-Saxon countries with cultural environments and health systems that are very different from Spanish-speaking contexts. The aim of this study to understand the conceptual, evaluation and clinical application nuances of compassion and compassionate care in Spanish-speaking health care settings, through a systematic review. A search of the scientific literature was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines in ProQuest Central, PubMed and Web Of Science, resulting in 295 studies, of which 27 were selected, based on the following inclusion criteria: the article studied or analyzed the construct of compassion in healthcare setting and the participants were Spanish speakers or the authors spoke of the construct in Spanish. Two blinded evaluators performed the study selection process using the Covidence tool. The agreement between evaluators was in all cases satisfactory. Different definitions of the construct have been identified, that they generally share: the recognition of suffering and the attempt to alleviate it. There are few studies that focus solely on the analysis of compassion, since other concepts appear that are associated with it, such as empathy and self-compassion. Further research is needed to obtain a better and greater understanding of compassionate care adapted to the perceptions of patients and health professionals in different socio-cultural contexts. In this way, instruments that measure compassionate care can be better developed and adjusted, and interventions aimed at promoting compassion can be properly assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Salvador Zaragozá
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XDepartament of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibánez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Soto-Rubio
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XDepartament of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibánez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Laura Lacomba-Trejo
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XDepartament of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibánez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Selene Valero-Moreno
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XDepartament of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibánez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Marian Pérez-Marín
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XDepartament of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibánez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Prevalence and correlates of psychological distress, unmet supportive care needs, and fear of cancer recurrence among haematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7755-7764. [PMID: 34164740 PMCID: PMC8221273 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06369-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disruptive effect on people with haematological cancers, who represent a high-risk population due to the nature of their disease and immunosuppressive treatments. We aimed to identify the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on haematology patients and identify correlated factors to inform the development of appropriate supportive interventions. Methods Three hundred and ninety-four respondents volunteered their participation in response to a study advertisement distributed online through established haematology groups. Participants completed a self-report online survey exploring wellbeing, psychological distress, unmet supportive care needs, and fear of cancer recurrence. Results At least 1 in 3 respondents (35%) reported clinical levels of distress and nearly 1 in 3 (32%) identified at least one unmet need. Among respondents in remission (n = 134), clinical fear of cancer recurrence was reported by nearly all (95%). Unmet needs, pre-existing health conditions, younger age, financial concerns, and perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 were the dominant factors contributing to psychological distress during the pandemic. Psychological distress, lost income, perceived inadequate support from care team, perceived risk of contracting COVID-19, and being a woman were significantly associated with unmet needs. Psychological distress and concern about the impact of COVID-19 on cancer management were significantly associated with fear of cancer recurrence among respondents in remission. Conclusion Results highlight the high psychological burden and unmet needs experienced by people with haematological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic and indicate a need for innovative solutions to rapidly identify distress and unmet needs during, and beyond, pandemic times. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06369-5.
Collapse
|
134
|
Bisseling EM, Compen FR, Schellekens MPJ, Thewes B, Speckens AEM, van der Lee ML. Exploring Fear of Cancer Recurrence in a Sample of Heterogeneous Distressed Cancer Patients with and Without a Psychiatric Disorder. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2021; 28:419-426. [PMID: 34138447 PMCID: PMC8458175 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-021-09776-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) is a concern among cancer patients. Recent insights suggest that FCR should be viewed as a distinct syndrome. However, few studies have explored its overlap with psychiatric morbidity. We examined this overlap in a sample of distressed cancer patients. Self-referred patients (n = 245) were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis-I disorders and the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form. Proportions of patients with and without a psychiatric disorder meeting validated cut-offs for screening and clinically relevant FCR were compared. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was 36%. Clinically relevant FCR was found in 198 patients (81%). Patients with a current psychiatric disorder reported clinically relevant FCR more frequently (89%) compared to those with no disorder (77%). Of patients reporting clinically relevant FCR, the majority (61%) did not additionally meet the criteria for a psychiatric disorder. These findings suggest that there should be particular attention for patients with elevated levels of FCR, warranting FCR-specific treatment. Trial registry number Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02138513
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Else M Bisseling
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525, EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Reinier Postlaan, Postbus 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Centre for Psycho-Oncology, Scientific Research Department, Helen Dowling Institute, 3723, MB, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Félix R Compen
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525, EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Reinier Postlaan, Postbus 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie P J Schellekens
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525, EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Reinier Postlaan, Postbus 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Centre for Psycho-Oncology, Scientific Research Department, Helen Dowling Institute, 3723, MB, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Belinda Thewes
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Anne E M Speckens
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525, EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Reinier Postlaan, Postbus 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije L van der Lee
- Centre for Psycho-Oncology, Scientific Research Department, Helen Dowling Institute, 3723, MB, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037, AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Individual courses and determinants of fear of cancer recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors with and without recurrence. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7647-7657. [PMID: 34137933 PMCID: PMC8549971 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06329-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study investigated the prevalence, individual courses, and determinants of fear of cancer recurrence (FoR) in long-term breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with and without recurrence. Methods A total of 184 breast cancer survivors were surveyed at four measurement time points: during hospitalization (T1), 10 weeks (T2), 40 weeks (T3), and 5–6 years (T4) after hospital discharge. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression were performed. Results Respondents were females and 57 years old, on average. At T1, T3, and T4, 54.8%, 31.6%, and 29.7% of BCSs, respectively, were classified as having dysfunctional levels of FoR. Dysfunctional FoR decreased from T1 to T3 (χ2(1) = 17.11, p = 0.000; N = 163) and remained stable afterwards. Eight subgroups of individual courses of FoR over time could be described: (1) constant functional FoR; (2) constant dysfunctional FoR; (3) improving from dysfunctional to functional FoR from T1 to T3; (4) improving from dysfunctional to functional FoR from T3 to T4; (5) worsening from functional to dysfunctional FoR from T1 to T3; (6) worsening from functional to dysfunctional FoR from T3 to T4; (7) dysfunctional FoR at T1 and T4, and functional FoR in between; and (8) functional FoR at T1 and T4, and dysfunctional FoR in between. Logistic regression analysis revealed that being divorced/widowed, showing high levels of fatigue, being treated by chemotherapy, and having low confidence in treatment were associated with dysfunctional FoR 5 to 6 years after diagnosis (Nagelkerkes’ Pseudo-R2 = 0.648). Conclusions The findings reveal that FoR is a significant issue in long-term BCSs and has the potential to become a persistent psychological strain. We emphasize the need for increased awareness of FoR among BCSs and the need for support programs.
Collapse
|
136
|
Serafimovska A, Liu J, Beith J, Butow P. Patients' and oncologists' perspectives on a novel Clinician-led Fear of Cancer Recurrence (CIFeR) Intervention. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7637-7646. [PMID: 34132882 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite strong demand from breast cancer survivors, there is a dearth of flexibly delivered, accessible psychological interventions addressing fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). This study aimed to explore patients' and clinicians' perspectives concerning the experience, utility and barriers to a novel clinician-led FCR intervention (CIFeR). METHODS Twenty female participants (mean age, 59.8, SD = 11.43), diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (mean years since diagnosis = 2.8, SD = 1.37 years) participated in telephone interviews, and their five oncologists completed a semi-structured electronic survey. Thematic qualitative analyses were performed on interview transcripts and survey responses. RESULTS Findings indicated both patients and clinicians were positive about CIFeR with perceived cognitive, behavioural and emotional benefits of CIFeR most pronounced for patients with clinically significant FCR. All patients, however, found that receiving CIFeR (especially the tailored prognostic information) from their oncologists with whom they had a long-standing relationship added a much-needed human element to addressing FCR. Similarly, clinicians valued CIFeR as a clear and consistent way to address unmet needs around FCR, with some barriers around time, language and cultural issues noted. CONCLUSION Overall, all participants perceived CIFeR as strongly beneficial in reducing FCR and related worries, thus warranting further evaluation of its utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Serafimovska
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jia Liu
- ProCan, The Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Jane Beith
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Soriano EC, Perndorfer C, Otto AK, Fenech AL, Siegel SD, Dickson-Witmer D, Clements L, Laurenceau JP. Psychosocial Impact of Cancer Care Disruptions in Women With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol 2021; 12:662339. [PMID: 34194367 PMCID: PMC8236578 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in cancer care, and preliminary research suggests that these disruptions are associated with increased levels of psychosocial distress among cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to offer a descriptive report of the psychosocial functioning, perceived risk and fear of cancer progression, and COVID-19 pandemic impact and experiences in a unique, high-risk patient cohort: breast cancer survivors whose cancer treatment was delayed and/or changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 50 women with dual carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, or invasive breast cancer whose cancer surgery was postponed due to the pandemic. As they awaited delayed surgery or shortly after they received delayed surgery, participants completed questionnaires on psychosocial functioning (depression, anxiety, sleep, and quality of life), their perceived risk and fear of cancer progression, patient-provider communication about disruptions in their care, personal impact of the pandemic, worry/threat about COVID-19, and COVID-19 symptoms/diagnoses. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were computed among continuous study variables. Independent samples t-tests explored group differences in psychosocial functioning between survivors who were still awaiting delayed surgery and those who had recently received it. Results: Overall, the sample denied that the pandemic seriously negatively impacted their finances or resource access and reported low-to-moderate levels of psychosocial distress and fear about COVID-19. Twenty-six percent had clinically significant levels of fear of cancer progression, with levels comparable to other recent work. About a third were still awaiting delayed cancer surgery and this group reported lower satisfaction with communication from oncology providers but overall did not seem to report more psychosocial difficulties than those who already had surgery. Conclusion: Shortly before or after primary breast cancer surgery that was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this sample of survivors appears to be generally managing well psychosocially. However, many psychosocial difficulties (e.g., fear of cancer recurrence/progression) typically have an onset after the completion of treatment, therefore, research should continue to follow this cohort of cancer survivors as the pandemic's direct impact on their care likely increases their risk for these difficulties later in survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C. Soriano
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Christine Perndorfer
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Amy K. Otto
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Alyssa L. Fenech
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Scott D. Siegel
- Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Diana Dickson-Witmer
- Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Lydia Clements
- Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Jean-Philippe Laurenceau
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Psychological Resilience, Metacognitions, and Fear of Recurrence Among Cancer Survivors and Family Caregivers. Cancer Nurs 2021; 45:E454-E462. [PMID: 34120129 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a life crisis that can have devastating consequences not only on the affected individual but also on his/her caregivers. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of psychological resilience and metacognitions of cancer survivors and their family caregivers (FCs) on fear of recurrence (FoR). METHODS This study used a cross-sectional design while adhering to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Data were collected from 112 cancer survivors and 112 FCs recruited from 5 oncology hospitals. RESULTS The cancer survivors and caregivers reported low levels of psychological resilience, which we found to be correlated with great fear of recurrence in cancer survivors and FCs. It was also in relation with metacognitions in cancer survivors and FCs.The findings showed that psychological resilience negatively predicted the fear of recurrence, whereas the metacognitions positively predicted the fear of recurrence in cancer survivors and FCs. The total effects of psychological resilience on the FoR in cancer survivors and FCs were 0.920 (confidence interval [CI], -2.059 to 0.072) and 0.061 (CI, -0.475 to 0.474), respectively. The total effects of metacognition on the FoR in cancer survivors and FCs were 1.164 (CI, 0.217-2.371) and 0.486 (CI, 0.016-1.058), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The findings underline the direct and indirect mediating role of psychological resilience and metacognition of cancer survivors and FCs on FoR. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE The findings are particularly important to oncology nurses, who as 24-hour care providers are important sources of psychosocial care. Their awareness of factors influencing FoR is critical for achieving positive outcomes.
Collapse
|
139
|
Séguin Leclair C, Lebel S, Westmaas JL. Can Physical Activity and Healthy Diet Help Long-Term Cancer Survivors Manage Their Fear of Recurrence? Front Psychol 2021; 12:647432. [PMID: 34177701 PMCID: PMC8219846 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) adversely affects quality of life, but health behaviors such as physical activity (PA) and fruit and vegetable intake (FVI) may help alleviate FCR for some survivors. This cross-sectional study tested the common-sense model (CSM) of FCR by investigating associations between constructs from the CSM (perceived illness consequences, control over health, and timeline), and survivors' health behaviors, health self-efficacy, and FCR. Methods: Using wave 3 data from the American Cancer Society Longitudinal Study of Cancer Survivorship-I, path analyses were conducted among mixed-cancer participants (N = 2,337) who were on average 8.8 mean years post-diagnosis. Results: A final good fitting model [χ 2 (5, N = 2,337) = 38.12, p < 0.001; SRMR = 0.02; CFI = 0.99; RMSEA = 0.05] indicated that perceiving fewer illness consequences, and greater control over one's health, were directly associated with higher PA (β = 0.15 and -0.24, p < 0.01, respectively) and higher health self-efficacy (β = 0.24, -0.38, p < 0.01, respectively). Timeline (i.e., perceiving cancer as chronic) was directly associated with lower health self-efficacy (β = -0.15, p < 0.01) and higher FCR (β = 0.51, p < 0.01). Both greater PA and FVI were directly associated with higher health self-efficacy (β = 0.10 and 0.11, p < 0.01, respectively) which in turn showed a direct association with lower FCR (β = -0.15, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Increasing survivors' sense of control over health, decreasing perceived chronicity of the illness, and mitigating its consequences may increase their health behaviors and health self-efficacy, which in turn could decrease their FCR. Longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophie Lebel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - J Lee Westmaas
- Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Kan JM, Dieng M, Butow PN, Mireskandari S, Tesson S, Menzies SW, Costa DSJ, Morton RL, Mann GJ, Cust AE, Kasparian NA. Identifying the 'Active Ingredients' of an Effective Psychological Intervention to Reduce Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Process Evaluation. Front Psychol 2021; 12:661190. [PMID: 34163405 PMCID: PMC8215538 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Psychological interventions targeting fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) are effective in reducing fear and distress. Process evaluations are an important, yet scarce adjunct to published intervention trials, despite their utility in guiding the interpretation of study outcomes and optimizing intervention design for broader implementation. Accordingly, this paper reports the findings of a process evaluation conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention for melanoma patients. Methods: Men and women with a history of Stage 0-II melanoma at high-risk of developing new primary disease were recruited via High Risk Melanoma Clinics across Sydney, Australia and randomly allocated to receive the psychological intervention (n = 80) or usual care (n = 84). Intervention participants received a tailored psycho-educational resource and three individual psychotherapeutic sessions delivered via telehealth. Qualitative and quantitative data on intervention context, processes, and delivery (reach, dose, and fidelity), and mechanisms of impact (participant responses, moderators of outcome) were collected from a range of sources, including participant surveys, psychotherapeutic session audio-recordings, and clinical records. Results: Almost all participants reported using the psycho-educational resource (97%), received all intended psychotherapy sessions (96%), and reported high satisfaction with both intervention components. Over 80% of participants would recommend the intervention to others, and a small proportion (4%) found discussion of melanoma-related experiences confronting. Perceived benefits included enhanced doctor-patient communication, talking more openly with family members about melanoma, and improved coping. Of potential moderators, only higher FCR severity at baseline (pre-intervention) was associated with greater reductions in FCR severity (primary outcome) at 6-month follow-up (primary endpoint). Conclusions: Findings support the acceptability and feasibility of a psychological intervention to reduce FCR amongst individuals at high risk of developing another melanoma. Implementation into routine melanoma care is an imperative next step, with FCR screening recommended to identify those most likely to derive the greatest psychological benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice M Kan
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mbathio Dieng
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shab Mireskandari
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie Tesson
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Scott W Menzies
- Discipline of Dermatology, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel S J Costa
- Pain Management Research Institute, The University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,John Curtin School of Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nadine A Kasparian
- Cincinnati Children's Center for Heart Disease and Mental Health, Heart Institute and the Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, United States.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Wagner LI, Tooze JA, Hall DL, Levine BJ, Beaumont J, Duffecy J, Victorson D, Gradishar W, Leach J, Saphner T, Sturtz K, Smith ML, Penedo F, Mohr DC, Cella D. Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Breast Cancer Survivors' Fear of Recurrence: Results from the FoRtitude Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1495-1505. [PMID: 34057469 PMCID: PMC8244801 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a prevalent concern among breast cancer survivors (BCS), yet few accessible interventions exist. This study evaluated a targeted eHealth intervention, “FoRtitude,” to reduce FoR using cognitive behavioral skills training and telecoaching. Methods BCS (N = 196) were recruited from an academic medical center and 3 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program community sites, had stage 0-III breast cancer, were 1-10 years postprimary treatment, with moderate to high FoR and familiarity with the internet. Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, participants were independently randomly assigned to 3 cognitive behavioral skills (relaxation, cognitive restructuring, worry practice) vs an attention control condition (health management content [HMC]) and to telecoaching (motivational interviewing) vs no telecoaching. Website content was released across 4 weeks and included didactic lessons, interactive tools, and a text-messaging feature. BCS completed the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory scores over time were compared using mixed-effects models. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results FCRI scores [SD] decreased statistically significantly from baseline to postintervention (T0 = 53.1 [17.4], T2 = 41.9 [16.2], P < .001). The magnitude of reduction in FCRI scores was comparable across cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and attention control HMC conditions and was predicted by increased self-efficacy. Telecoaching was associated with lower attrition and greater website use (mean adherence score [SD] = 26.6 [7.2] vs 21.0 [10.5], P < .001). Conclusions BCS experienced statistically significant reductions in FoR postintervention, but improvements were comparable between CBT and attention controls. Telecoaching improved adherence and retention. Future research is needed on optimal integration of CBT and HMC, dose, and features of eHealth delivery that contributed to reducing FoR. In the COVID-19 era, remote delivery has become even more essential for reaching survivors struggling with FoR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne I Wagner
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Janet A Tooze
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Daniel L Hall
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Beverly J Levine
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | | | - Jenna Duffecy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
| | - David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - William Gradishar
- Department of Medicine/Division of Hematology & Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | - Frank Penedo
- Departments of Medicine and Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL
| | - David C Mohr
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Frangou E, Bertelli G, Love S, Mackean MJ, Glasspool RM, Fotopoulou C, Cook A, Nicum S, Lord R, Ferguson M, Roux RL, Martinez M, Butcher C, Hulbert-Williams N, Howells L, Blagden SP. OVPSYCH2: A randomized controlled trial of psychological support versus standard of care following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:431-439. [PMID: 34059348 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of disease progression (FOP) is a rational concern for women with Ovarian Cancer (OC) and depression is also common. To date there have been no randomized trials assessing the impact of psychological intervention on depression and FOP in this patient group. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with primary or recurrent OC who had recently completed chemotherapy were eligible if they scored between 5 and 19 on the PHQ-9 depression and were randomized 1:1 to Intervention (3 standardized CBT-based sessions in the 6-12 weeks post-chemotherapy) or Control (standard of care). PHQ-9, FOP-Q-SF, EORTC QLQ C30 and OV28 questionnaires were then completed every 3 months for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was change in PHQ-9 at 3 months. Secondary endpoints were change in other scores at 3 months and all scores at later timepoints. RESULTS 182 patients registered; 107 were randomized; 54 to Intervention and 53 to Control; mean age 59 years; 75 (70%) had completed chemotherapy for primary and 32 (30%) for relapsed OC and 67 patients completed both baseline and 3-month questionnaires. Improvement in PHQ-9 was observed for patients in both study arms at three months compared to baseline but there was no significant difference in change between Intervention and Control. A significant improvement on FOP-Q-SF scores was seen in the Intervention arm, whereas for those in the Control arm FOP-Q-SF scores deteriorated at 3 months (intervention effect = -4.4 (-7.57, -1.22), p-value = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS CBT-based psychological support provided after chemotherapy did not significantly alter the spontaneously improving trajectory of depression scores at three months but caused a significant improvement in FOP. Our findings call for the routine implementation of FOP support for ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Frangou
- Centre for Statistics and Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | | | - S Love
- Centre for Statistics and Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - M J Mackean
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - C Fotopoulou
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Cook
- Gloucester Oncology Centre, Cheltenham, UK
| | - S Nicum
- Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Lord
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK
| | | | - R L Roux
- Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Martinez
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - C Butcher
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office (OCTO), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - L Howells
- Research Team, Maggie's Centres, London, UK
| | - S P Blagden
- Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Diekmann A, Schellenberger B, Reck S, Heuser C, Geiser F, Wirtz M, Ansmann L, Ernstmann N. Is patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences associated with their fear of progression? Psychooncology 2021; 30:1572-1581. [PMID: 34004041 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies found that some breast cancer patients in Germany are invited to participate in a multidisciplinary tumor conference (MTC) during the discussion of their own case. MTCs are regular meetings of a treatment team in which the diagnosis and treatment plan of cancer patients are discussed. Psychological consequences concerning the patients' participation in an MTC have not been examined yet. This study examines the association between patients' participation in MTC and patients' fear of progression (FoP). METHODS This analysis is part of a larger project named "Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in Breast Cancer Care" (PINTU) which is a multicenter observational mixed-methods study. The study was conducted in six breast and gynecological cancer centers in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Data were collected from 2018 to 2020 by patient survey at three time points. Patients with (n = 81) and without (n = 120) MTC participation were compared. FoP was measured with a 12-item short form of the FoP Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF) at all three measurement time points. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, a one-way repeated variance analysis (ANOVA), and a one-way repeated ANCOVA using the propensity score as a covariate. RESULTS Data of n = 201 patients were included in the analysis. In general, FoP scores decreased in both groups from T0 to T2 (F = 36.539, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.155). Non-participating patients did not differ with regard to their FoP from patients who participated in an MTC before and after participation. The results of AN(C)OVA revealed no significant effects concerning the influence of patient participation in an MTC on FoP (F = 0.014, p = 0.907, η2 = <0.001 and (F = 0.013, p = 0.909, η2 = <0.001). CONCLUSION Since the FoP is not influenced by participation, the findings do not support recommendations for or against patient participation in an MTC. Further research should focus on the question of which patient groups might benefit from participation in an MTC with regard to which outcome variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Diekmann
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Barbara Schellenberger
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sebastian Reck
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Heuser
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franziska Geiser
- Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus Wirtz
- Department of Research Methods, University of Education, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lena Ansmann
- Division for Organizational Health Services Research, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Nicole Ernstmann
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Dalton K, Waterman M, Wassersug R, Garland SN. Fear of cancer recurrence in males diagnosed with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:6183-6186. [PMID: 34023951 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06307-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significant problem for individuals diagnosed with a variety of different cancers. To date, FCR has not been studied in males with breast cancer. The objective of this study was to examine the severity of FCR in males with breast cancer. METHODS Males with breast cancer participated in an anonymous online survey and completed the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form scale (FCRI-SF). A frequency analysis was used to determine the percentage of participants that fell above or below the clinical cutoff for significant FCR. Regressions explored associations between FCR, age, cancer stage, time since diagnosis, and self-health rating. RESULTS Fifty-nine participants completed the FCRI-SF. The mean age of the sample was 63.5 and 93% reported their race as white. The mean FCR score was 23.9 and 61% reported clinically significant FCR. More than 80% of the sample experienced at least problematic levels of FCR. Increasing age was associated with decreased FCR. CONCLUSION Results of this study suggest that FCR is prevalent in men with breast cancer but larger studies with representative samples should be undertaken to better assess the prevalence of FCR in this population and compare it with other groups of patients. More attention is needed to understand the psychological distress experienced by men diagnosed and treated for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Dalton
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Memorial University, 232 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3X9, Canada
| | - Meghan Waterman
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Memorial University, 232 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3X9, Canada
| | - Richard Wassersug
- Department of Cellular & Physiological Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sheila N Garland
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Memorial University, 232 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3X9, Canada.
- Discipline of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 232 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3X9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Anderson K, Smith A'B, Diaz A, Shaw J, Butow P, Sharpe L, Girgis A, Lebel S, Dhillon H, Burhansstipanov L, Tighe B, Garvey G. A Systematic Review of Fear of Cancer Recurrence Among Indigenous and Minority Peoples. Front Psychol 2021; 12:621850. [PMID: 34012412 PMCID: PMC8126623 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
While cancer survivors commonly experience fear and anxiety, a substantial minority experience an enduring and debilitating fear that their cancer will return; a condition commonly referred to as fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Despite recent advances in this area, little is known about FCR among people from Indigenous or other ethnic and racial minority populations. Given the high prevalence and poor outcomes of cancer among people from these populations, a robust understanding of FCR among people from these groups is critical. The current review identified and aggregated existing literature on FCR amongst adult cancer survivors from Indigenous and minority populations. The protocol of this review was registered with PROSPERO in July 2020 (Registration number: CRD42020161655). A systematic search of bibliographic databases was conducted for relevant articles published from 1997 to November 2019. Data from eligible articles were extracted and appraised for quality by two independent reviewers. Nineteen articles from four countries (United States of America, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom) met the inclusion criteria, including 14 quantitative, 4 qualitative and 1 mixed-methods study. Only one article reported on an Indigenous population. Few studies reported on FCR prevalence (n = 3) or severity (n = 9). While the variation in tools used to measure FCR hindered a robust estimate of severity, results suggested some differences in FCR severity between minority and dominant populations, although these may have been due to study metholodological differences. Few factors were reported as being associated with FCR in minorities across multiple studies. The qualitative synthesis found five themes associated with the lived experience of FCR: (i) variations in the lived experience of FCR; (ii) spirituality and worldview impacting on FCR; (iii) the importance of staying positive; (iv) complexities around support; and (v) increasing cancer knowledge. The findings of this review highlight differences in FCR across cultures and contexts, which reinforces the need for culturally-specific approaches to this condition. The dearth of research in this area is of concern given the significant burden of cancer in these populations. A deeper understanding of this condition among Indigenous and minority populations is critical to developing and delivering appropriate and effective psychosocial care for cancer survivors from these groups. Systematic Review Registration: identifier [CRD42020161655].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Anderson
- Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Allan 'Ben' Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education & Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Abbey Diaz
- Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Centre for Oncology Education & Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sophie Lebel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Haryana Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Boden Tighe
- Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Gail Garvey
- Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Uner FO, Korukcu O. A qualitative exploration of fear of cancer recurrence in Turkish cancer survivors who were referred for colposcopy. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2021; 29:729-737. [PMID: 33662170 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to qualitatively explore factors related to fear of cancer recurrence in women who had a risk of cervical cancer relapse/metastasis and to identify the psychological effect of gynaecological examination and colposcopy in cancer survivors. We conducted the present descriptive study with a qualitative design based on the thematic analysis approach on ten women who under suspicion of new cancer and were admitted to the Gynaecological Oncology Polyclinic of Akdeniz University for colposcopy between July and October 2017 via in-depth interviews. As a result of the interviews, we identified three main themes: colposcopy-related fear, emotions associated with fear of cancer recurrence, and fear of being diagnosed with cancer. Moreover it was determined that women experienced a fear of death, fear of family being affected, fear of stigmatisation by society, and fear of not coping with the treatment process. We found that women with cancer history and undergoing colposcopy because of abnormal cervical cytology in routine oncology controls experienced a significant fear of cancer recurrence. We found that gynaecological examination and colposcopy caused anxiety in patients. Healthcare professions should be aware and help women to cope with the fear of cancer recurrence in the colposcopy process and should determine the social care needs of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Ozlem Uner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Health, Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Turkey
| | - Oznur Korukcu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Examining Predictors of Fear of Cancer Recurrence Using Leventhal's Commonsense Model: Distinct Implications for Oncology Nurses. Cancer Nurs 2021; 44:3-12. [PMID: 31868820 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common concern for survivors. Oncology nurses have a unique opportunity to identify survivors at increased risk of heightened FCR. Understanding predictors of FCR would be useful for this purpose; however, results about FCR predictors are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE To examine empirically inconsistent predictors of FCR as guided by Leventhal's Commonsense Model. METHODS A cross-sectional survey design was used to assess FCR, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and characteristics of the self (self-esteem and generalized expectancies) among cancer survivors. Structural equation modeling was used to examine predictors of FCR. RESULTS Among 1001 participants, the mean time since diagnosis was 9.07 years, and most were diagnosed with breast cancer (65.93%). The strongest predictor of higher FCR was belief that knowing someone with a recurrence affects one's own level of FCR, although knowing someone with a recurrence actually predicted lower FCR. Other significant predictors of higher FCR were having 1 or more symptoms attributed to cancer, lower self-esteem, younger age, female gender, lower pessimism, longer time since diagnosis, and active follow-up at the survivorship clinic. CONCLUSION Cancer survivors' perceptions are among an important series of variables that may predict higher levels of FCR. Oncology nurses are uniquely situated to identify the subset of cancer survivors with levels of FCR requiring professional intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Oncology nurses can use the predictors indicated in this study to identify survivors with greatest need for coping with FCR to facilitate expedient intervention and/or referral to psychosocial providers.
Collapse
|
148
|
Clusters of Psychological Symptoms in Breast Cancer: Is There a Common Psychological Mechanism? Cancer Nurs 2021; 43:343-353. [PMID: 30950932 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer patients tend to experience numerous concurrent psychological symptoms that form clusters. It has been proposed that a common psychological mechanism may underlie the membership of symptoms in a given cluster, but this hypothesis has never been investigated. Maladaptive emotion regulation (ER) is one possible common mechanism. OBJECTIVE This study examined cross-sectional and prospective relationships between subjective (experiential avoidance, expressive suppression, and cognitive reappraisal) and objective (high-frequency heart rate variability) measures of ER and clusters of psychological symptoms among women receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer. METHOD A total of 81 women completed a battery of self-report scales before (T1) and after (T2) radiotherapy, including measures of anxiety, depression, fear of cancer recurrence, insomnia, fatigue, pain, and cognitive impairments. Resting high-frequency heart rate variability was measured at T1. RESULTS Latent profile analyses identified between 2 and 3 clusters of patients with similar levels of symptoms at T1 and T2 and with a similar profile of symptom changes between T1 and T2. Discriminant analyses showed that higher levels of avoidance and suppression predicted membership in symptom clusters that included more severe symptoms cross-sectionally at T1 and at T2 (both P values < .0001). However, ER at T1 did not significantly predict membership in clusters of symptom changes between T1 and T2 (P = .15). CONCLUSION Maladaptive ER strategies, more particularly suppression and avoidance, are a possible psychological mechanism underlying clusters of cancer-related psychological symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Psychological interventions targeting maladaptive ER strategies have the potential to treat several psychological symptoms simultaneously.
Collapse
|
149
|
Maheu C, Singh M, Tock WL, Eyrenci A, Galica J, Hébert M, Frati F, Estapé T. Fear of Cancer Recurrence, Health Anxiety, Worry, and Uncertainty: A Scoping Review About Their Conceptualization and Measurement Within Breast Cancer Survivorship Research. Front Psychol 2021; 12:644932. [PMID: 33912113 PMCID: PMC8072115 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR), Health Anxiety (HA), worry, and uncertainty in illness are psychological concerns commonly faced by cancer patients. In survivorship research, these similar, yet different constructs are frequently used interchangeably and multiple instruments are used in to measure them. The lack of clear and consistent conceptualization and measurement can lead to diverse or contradictory interpretations. The purpose of this scoping review was to review, compare, and analyze the current conceptualization and measurements used for FCR, HA, worry, and uncertainty in the breast cancer survivorship literature to improve research and practice. Inclusion Criteria: We considered quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies of breast cancer survivors that examined FCR, HA, worry, or uncertainty in illness as a main topic and included a definition or assessment of the constructs. Methods and Analysis: The six-staged framework was used to guide the scoping review process. Searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were conducted. The principle-based qualitative analysis and simultaneous content analysis procedures were employed to synthesize and map the findings. Findings: After duplicate removal, the search revealed 3,299 articles, of which 82 studies met the inclusion criteria. Several critical attributes overlapped the four constructs, for example, all were triggered by internal somatic and external cues. However, several unique attributes were found (e.g., a sense of loss of security in the body is observed only among survivors experiencing FCR). Overall, findings showed that FCR and uncertainty in illness are more likely to be triggered by cancer-specific factors, while worry and HA have more trait-like in terms of characteristics, theoretical features, and correlates. We found that the measures used to assess each construct were on par with their intended constructs. Eighteen approaches were used to measure FCR, 15 for HA, 8 for worry, and 4 for uncertainty. Conclusion: While consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of the four constructs has not yet been reached, this scoping review identifies key similarities and differences to aid in their selection and measurement. Considering the observed overlap between the four studied constructs, further research delineating the unique attributes for each construct is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Maheu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mina Singh
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wing Lam Tock
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Asli Eyrenci
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jacqueline Galica
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Maude Hébert
- Département des Sciences Infirmières, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Francesca Frati
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Tania Estapé
- Psychosocial Oncology Department, Fundació per l'Educació i la Formació en Càncer (FEFOC) Fundació, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Seo YK, Park J, Park JH, Kim S. What influences aromatase inhibitor continuation intention among breast cancer survivors? KOREAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN HEALTH NURSING 2021; 27:49-57. [PMID: 36311992 PMCID: PMC9334169 DOI: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.01.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely prescribed for postmenopausal women with breast cancer and are known to cause musculoskeletal pain. This study aimed to identify factors associated with AI continuation intention among breast cancer survivors (BCS). Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 123 BCS (stages I–III), who had been taking AIs for at least 6 weeks. Participants were recruited from a cancer center in Goyang, Korea, from September to November 2019. Descriptive statistics, Welch analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients, and simple linear regression were used for the analysis. Results Beliefs about endocrine therapy was a significant predictor of AI continuation intention (β=.66, p<.001). The majority of participants (87.0%) reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain since taking AIs and the score for the worst pain severity within 24 hours was 5.08±2.80 out of 10. Musculoskeletal pain, however, was not associated with AI continuation intention. Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) was clinically significant (≥13) for 74.0% of the respondents (mean, 17.62±7.14). Musculoskeletal pain severity and pain interference were significantly associated with FCR (r=.21, p<.05; r=.35, p<.01, respectively). Pain interference was significantly associated with beliefs about endocrine therapy (r=–.18, p<.05). Conclusion AI continuation intention can be modified by reinforcing patients’ beliefs about endocrine therapy. Musculoskeletal pain may have a negative effect on beliefs about endocrine therapy and increase FCR among BCS. Thus, awareness of musculoskeletal pain during AI therapy should be raised and further research is required to develop multidisciplinary pain management strategies and clinical guidelines to reinforce beliefs about endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeongok Park
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Hee Park
- College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sue Kim
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Corresponding author: Sue Kim College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea Tel: +82-2228-3276 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|