A multi-institutional experience with stereotactic radiosurgery for solitary brain metastasis

Combining stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapy for brain metastases: a potential role for temozolomide

Brain metastases are unfortunately very common in the natural history of many solid tumors and remain a life-threatening condition, associated with a dismal prognosis, despite many clinical trials aimed at improving outcomes. Radiation therapy options for brain metastases include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS avoids the potential toxicities of WBRT and is associated with excellent local control (LC) rates. However, distant intracranial failure following SRS remains a problem, suggesting that untreated intracranial micrometastatic disease is responsible for failure of treatment. The oral alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ), which has demonstrated efficacy in primary malignant central nervous system tumors such as glioblastoma, has been used in early phase trials in the treatment of established brain metastases. Although results of these studies in established, macroscopic metastatic disease have been modest at best, there is clinical and preclinical data to suggest that TMZ is more efficacious at treating and controlling clinically undetectable intracranial micrometastatic disease. We review the available data for the primary management of brain metastases with SRS, as well as the use of TMZ in treating established brain metastases and undetectable micrometastatic disease, and suggest the role for a clinical trial with the aims of treating macroscopically visible brain metastases with SRS combined with TMZ to address microscopic, undetectable disease.

A prospective pilot study of two-session Gamma Knife surgery for large metastatic brain tumors

The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of two-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) alone for large metastatic brain tumors. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients with large metastatic brain tumors (volume >15 cm(3) in the supratentorial region or >10 cm(3) in the infratentorial region), and (ii) tumors not causing clinical signs of impending cerebral herniation. Twenty-eight lesions in 27 consecutive patients (18 men and 9 women, age range 32 to 88 years, median age 65 years) were included in this study. The radiosurgical protocol was as follows: 20-30 Gy given in two fractions 3-4 weeks apart. The local tumor control rate and the overall survival rate were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median tumor volumes were 17.8 cm(3) at first GKS and 9.7 cm(3) at second GKS. Median follow-up time was 8.9 months. The local control rate was 85 % at 6 months and 61 % at 12 months. The overall survival rate after GKS was 63 % at 6 months and 45 % at 12 months. The 1-year rate of prevention of neurological death was maintained at 78 %. Mean Karnofsky performance status (KPS) improved from 61 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 57-71] at first GKS to 80 (95 % CI, 74-85) at second GKS; the best follow-up mean KPS was 85 (95 % CI, 78-91) (p < 0.001). Local tumor recurrence necessitated craniotomy in two patients and repeat GKS in three patients. Seventeen patients died, and the causes of death were as follows: 3 from local progression, 2 from meningeal carcinomatosis, and 12 from progression of the primary tumor. Delayed symptomatic perilesional edema developed in one patient and eventually resolved with conservative treatment. Two-session GKS for large brain metastases appears to be an effective treatment in terms of both local tumor control and neurological palliation with minimal treatment-related morbidity. These data suggest that two-session GKS could be used as an alternative to surgical resection of large tumors in patients with significant comorbidity and/or at an advanced age. The optimum regimen for dose and fraction schedule remains to be established.

[Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery : QUIRO-DEGRO Trial]

BACKGROUND

The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the required resources (technical equipment and medical staff) for stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

At two radiotherapy centers of excellence (University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Marburg/Giessen), the manpower and time required for the implementation of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was prospectively collected consistently over a 3-month period. The data were collected using specifically developed process acquisition tools and standard forms and were evaluated using specific process analysis tools.

RESULTS

For intracranial (extracranial) fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and radiosurgery (RS), a total of 1,925 (270) and 199 (36) records, respectively, could be evaluated. The approximate time needed to customize the immobilization device was median 37 min (89 min) for FRST and 31 min (26 min) for RS, for the contrast enhanced planning studies 22 and 27 min (25 and 28 min), for physical treatment planning 122 and 59 min (187 and 27 min), for the first and routine radiotherapy sessions for FSRT 40 and 13 min (58 and 31 min), respectively. The median time needed for the RS session was 58 min (45 min). The corresponding minimal manpower needed was 2 technicians for customization of the immobilization device, 2.5 technicians and 1 consultant for the contrast-enhanced planning studies, 1 consultant, 0.5 resident and 0.67 medical physics expert (MPE) for physical treatment planning, as well as 1 consultant, 0.5 resident, and 2.5 technicians for the first radiotherapy treatment and 2.33 technicians for routine radiotherapy sessions.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, the resource requirements for a radiotherapy department for the maintenance, protection and optimization of operational readiness for the application of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was determined methodically.

Role of adjuvant radiosurgery after thoracoscopic microsurgical resection of a spinal schwannoma

Stereotactic radiosurgery to benign tumors of the spine has not been advocated as a primary treatment modality because of the favorable prognosis for these lesions after gross-total resection. There is even less evidence regarding its use as an adjuvant to neurosurgical resection of benign recurrent spinal disease. We describe the case of a 30-year-old man with a thoracic spinal schwannoma who had an interval increase of his lesion five months after thoracoscopic microsurgical resection. The patient opted for noninvasive stereotactic radiosurgery in lieu of additional surgical excision and has had stable disease 15 months after radiosurgical treatment with the linear accelerator (LINAC) system. In this setting, stereotactic radiosurgery provided a useful adjunct to thoracoscopic microsurgical resection. Future Class I and II evidence should be sought to evaluate the utility of stereotactic radiosurgery as a primary treatment modality or as an adjuvant for microneurosurgical resection of benign spinal lesions in patients who want noninvasive treatment after disease recurrence or who harbor medical comorbidities that would preclude them from being safe surgical candidates.

Leptomeningeal seeding in patients with brain metastases treated by gamma knife radiosurgery

To characterize the development of leptomeningeal seeding (LMS) in patients with brain metastases after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Eight hundred and twenty-seven patients that underwent GKRS as a part of an initial treatment plan for brain metastases between January 2002 and December 2010 were included in the study. Six hundred and fifty patients were treated with GKRS alone and 177 patients received GKRS combined with upfront whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Actuarial curves for overall survival (OS) and the development of LMS were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median overall survival for all patients was 55 weeks (95 % CI, 47.8-62.2), and the overall incidence of LMS was 5.3 %. The actuarial rates for LMS at 6 and 12 months were 3.1 and 5.8, respectively. Uni- and multivariate analysis suggested that breast cancer and a large number of metastases (n ≥ 4) are significant risk factors of LMS (P < 0.05). Regarding treatment modalities, the addition of WBRT was found to have a significant impact on lowering the risk of LMS by multivariate analysis (P = 0.045). LMS is an important pattern of CNS failure. The risk of LMS following GKRS may be associated with multiple lesions, breast cancer, and the omission of WBRT. Additional data from large-scale, randomized controlled trials are required to identify risk factors associated with the LMS more accurately.

Local control of newly diagnosed and distally recurrent, low-volume brain metastases with fixed-dose (20 gy) gamma knife radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Metastases to the brain occur in 20% to 30% of patients with cancer and have been identified on autopsy in as many as 50% of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy of 20-Gy Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) as initial treatment in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases ≤ 2 cm in greatest diameter.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 114 consecutive adults with Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60 who received GKR for 1 to 3 brain metastases ≤ 2 cm in size was performed. Five patients lacked detailed follow-up and were excluded, leaving 109 for outcome analysis (34 men and 75 women; median age, 61.2 years). All metastases received 20 Gy to the 50% isodose line.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients underwent treatment of 164 metastases at initial GKR. Twenty-six patients (23.9%) were alive at last follow-up (median time, 29.9 months; range, 6.6 months to 7.8 years). The median overall survival was 13.8 months (range, 1 day to 7.6 years). Among the 52 patients with distant failure, 33 patients received 20 Gy to 95 new lesions. A total of 259 metastases received 20 Gy, and 4 patients lacked imaging follow-up secondary to death before posttreatment imaging. Local failure occurred in 17 of 255 treated lesions (6.7%), yielding an overall local control rate of 93.3%. Actuarial local control at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 96%, 93%, 89%, and 88%, respectively. Permanent neurological complications occurred in 3 patients (2.8%).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases ≤ 2 cm in size who have not received whole-brain radiation therapy, GKR with 20 Gy provides high rates of local control with low morbidity and excellent neurological symptom-free survival.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: an update

Brain metastases are unfortunately a common occurrence in patients with cancer. Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is still considered the standard of care in the treatment of brain metastases. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers the additional ability to treat tumors with relative sparing of normal brain tissue in a single fraction. While the addition of SRS to WBRT has been shown to improve survival and local tumor control in selected patients, the idea of deferring WBRT in order to avoid its effects on normal tissues and using SRS alone continues to generate significant discussion and interest. Three recent randomized trials from Japan, Europe and the MD Anderson Cancer Center (TX, USA) have attempted to address this issue. In this article, we update a previous review by discussing these trials to compare the outcomes for SRS alone versus SRS plus WBRT for limited metastases. We also discuss recent nonrandomized evidence for the use of SRS alone for oligometastatic disease.

Radiographic response of brain metastasis after linear accelerator radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Radiographic response of brain metastasis to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over time has not been well characterized. Being able to predict SRS-induced changes in tumor size over time may allow improved counseling of patients and potentially earlier recognition of poor response to SRS.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the rate of change in size of metastatic brain tumors after treatment with a linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with LINAC SRS at the University of Florida between 1992 and 2009 who had at least one MRI after treatment. A total of 218 patients with 406 follow-up MRI scans were included in the study. Tumor area was calculated by measuring the largest tumor area on axial imaging and using the equation for area of an ellipse. Primary outcome was percent change in tumor size. The contribution of several factors including gender, primary tumor histology, synchronous or asynchronous presentation, prior treatment, primary tumor control, and SRS dose were examined using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 58.3 years (range 4-86), and 48.6% of patients were female. Sixty-three percent of patients had primary tumor control and 70.6% had asynchronous presentation of their brain metastases. SRS peripheral dose range was 1,000-2,250 cGy with a median of 1,750 cGy. The mean percent size change was -22.6% with a mean rate of change of -7.0% per month. The median percent change was -49.7% with a median rate of change of -8.8% per month. The median follow-up was 4.8 months (range 0.3-52.5). Female gender and melanoma histology were found to be significant predictors of an increase in tumor size. Lack of previous surgical resection was a significant predictor of a decrease in tumor size after SRS. Other factors tested with multivariate analysis, including age, synchronicity of presentation, dose, dose volume, Karnofsky performance score, and primary tumor control, were not significant in predicting tumor size change after SRS.

CONCLUSION

In this study, brain metastases decreased in size by a median of 50% for a median follow-up of 4.8 months after SRS. The overall rate of decrease was 9% per month after treatment with SRS. Melanoma histology was a predictor of poor tumor control.

Rapid clinical course of cerebral metastatic angiosarcoma from the heart

We report here one case of rapid and aggressive course of cerebral metastatic angiosarcoma from the heart. A 36-year-old man presented with 10-days history of headache. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated subacute hemorrhage with a small region of enhancement in right parietal region and the pathological diagnosis was angiosarcoma. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated 3.2×3 cm sized mass on right atrial wall. Newly developed lesion was reoperated, three and four weeks later respectively, and whole brain radiotherapy of total 30 Gy was done. With the interval of two months, gamma knife surgery was done for new lesions two times, which were well controlled. Newly developed lesions rapidly happened even in the adjuvant treatment. He died 9 months after the diagnosis because of the aggravation of primary cancer. The cerebral metastatic angiosarcoma from the heart showed the rapid aggressive behavior and the closed follow-up could be needed for the adjuvant treatment.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for brainstem metastasis

OBJECTIVE

Brainstem metastases are rarely operable and generally unresponsive to conventional radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Recently, Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) was used as feasible treatment option for brainstem metastasis. The present study evaluated our experience of brainstem metastasis which was treated with GKRS.

METHODS

Between November 1992 and June 2010, 32 patients (23 men and 9 women, mean age 56.1 years, range 39-73) were treated with GKRS for brainstem metastases. There were metastatic lesions in pons in 23, the midbrain in 6, and the medulla oblongata in 3 patients, respectively. The primary tumor site was lung in 21, breast in 3, kidney in 2 and other locations in 6 patients. The mean tumor volume was 1,517 mm(3) (range, 9-6,000), and the mean marginal dose was 15.9 Gy (range, 6-23). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was obtained every 2-3 months following GKRS. Follow-up MRI was possible in 24 patients at a mean follow-up duration of 12.0 months (range, 1-45). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Follow-up MRI showed tumor disappearance in 6, tumor shrinkage in 14, no change in tumor size in 1, and tumor growth in 3 patients, which translated into a local tumor control rate of 87.5% (21 of 24 tumors). The mean progression free survival was 12.2 months (range, 2-45) after GKRS. Nine patients were alive at the completion of the study, and the overall mean survival time after GKRS was 7.7 months (range, 1-22). One patient with metastatic melanoma experienced intratumoral hemorrhage during the follow-up period. Survival was found to be associated with score of more than 70 on Karnofsky performance status and low recursive partitioning analysis class (class 1 or 2), in terms of favorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

GKRS was found to be safe and effective for management of brainstem metastasis. The integral clinical status of patient seems to be important in determining the overall survival time.

The role of surgery, radiosurgery and whole brain radiation therapy in the management of patients with metastatic brain tumors

Brain tumors constitute the most common intracranial tumor. Management of brain metastases has become increasingly complex as patients with brain metastases are living longer and more treatment options develop. The goal of this paper is to review the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and surgery, in isolation and in combination, in the contemporary treatment of brain metastases. Surgery and SRS both offer management options that may help to optimize therapy in selected patients. WBRT is another option but can lead to late toxicity and suboptimal local control in longer term survivors. Improved prognostic indices will be critical for selecting the best therapies. Further prospective trials are necessary to continue to elucidate factors that will help triage patients to the proper brain-directed therapy for their cancer.

A review of current management of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

The brain metastasis (BM) represents one of the most common and refractory malignancies worldwide with a rising incidence in all countries. It is generally believed that once a BM has developed, this disease cannot be cured and has a poor prognosis. The challenges of managing this tumor include diagnosis and selective treatment options. In addition, patients with BM frequently have greater expectations of the current therapy outcomes, which hope to get long-term survival and good quality of life.

METHODS

This is a review of current clinical practice based on an exhaustive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. A series of case studies is presented to provide outcomes of the effective management in BMs that have required treatment for the terminal stage of patients with cancer, and makes recommendations for future practice.

RESULTS

Current technical advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of BM. After surgery, radiotherapy, or stereotactic radiosurgery, and for some cases additional systemic chemotherapy for the primary cancer, most patients experience meaningful symptom relief, improved quality of life and longer survival time. An evidence-based summary of recommendations has been produced to guide neurosurgeons and oncologists in managing this particular group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the available data, this treatment approach for well-selected patients is currently not recommended in the treatment of BMs except in experienced medical centers. Clinical judgment is made balancing surgical, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and management principles to advocacy the best therapy outcome.

Economic impact of stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant intracranial brain tumors

Brain metastases occur frequently in cancer patients and can lead to neurological complications that result in decreased quantity and quality of life. Treatment alternatives include whole-brain radiation therapy, neurosurgery and the newest modality, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This article reviews economic evaluations of SRS in the metastatic setting compared with other treatment options. Studies were included if they were published in peer-reviewed journals, primarily focused on patients with malignant brain metastasis and included a cost analysis between interventions. Uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness of SRS is due to a lack of efficacy information between treatment alternatives, methodological limitations and design differences between the available studies. When cost-effectiveness ratios are available, SRS appears to be a reasonable option in resource-limited settings, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios just below the US$50,000 range. However, better-designed economic analysis in the setting of randomized clinical trials or observational studies needs to be conducted to fully understand the economic value of SRS.

Multimodality treatment of brain metastases: an institutional survival analysis of 275 patients

Background

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and combinations of the three modalities are used in the management of patients with metastatic brain tumors. We present the previously unreported survival outcomes of 275 patients treated for newly diagnosed brain metastases at Cancer Care Northwest and Gamma Knife of Spokane between 1998 and 2008.

Methods

The effects treatment regimen, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS), primary tumor histology, number of brain metastases, and total volume of brain metastases have on patient overall survival were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Andersen 95% confidence intervals, approximate confidence intervals for log hazard-ratios, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

The median clinical follow up time was 7.2 months. On multivariate analysis, survival statistically favored patients treated with SRS alone when compared to patients treated with WBRT alone (p < 0.001), patients treated with resection with SRS when compared to patients treated with SRS alone (p = 0.020), patients in ECOG-PS class 0 when compared to patients in ECOG-PS classes 2 (p = 0.04), 3 (p < 0.001), and 4 (p < 0.001), patients in the non-small-cell lung cancer group when compared to patients in the combined melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma group (p < 0.001), and patients with breast cancer when compared to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our analysis, patients benefited from a combined modality treatment approach and physicians must consider patient age, performance status, and primary tumor histology when recommending specific treatments regimens.

Early significant tumor volume reduction after radiosurgery in brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma results in long-term survival

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate survival of patients with brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radiosurgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1998 and 2010, 46 patients were treated with radiosurgery, and the total number of lesions was 99. The mean age was 58.9 years (range, 33-78 years). Twenty-six patients (56.5%) had a single brain metastasis. The mean tumor volume was 3.0 cm(3) (range, 0.01-35.1 cm(3)), and the mean marginal dose prescribed was 20.8 Gy (range, 12-25 Gy) at the 50% isodose line. A patient was classified into the good-response group when the sum of the volume of the brain metastases decreased to less than 75% of the original volume at a 1-month follow-up evaluation using MRI.

RESULTS

As of December 28, 2010, 39 patients (84.8%) had died, and 7 (15.2%) survived. The overall median survival time was 10.0 ± 0.4 months (95% confidence interval, 9.1-10.8). After treatment, local tumor control was achieved in 72 (84.7%) of the 85 tumors assessed using MRI after radiosurgery. The good-response group survived significantly longer than the poor-response group (median survival times of 18.0 and 9.0 months, respectively; p = 0.025). In a multivariate analysis, classification in the good-response group was the only independent prognostic factor for longer survival (p = 0.037; hazard ratio = 0.447; 95% confidence interval, 0.209-0.953).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiosurgery seems to be an effective treatment modality for patients with brain metastases from RCC. The early significant tumor volume reduction observed after radiosurgery seems to result in long-term survival in RCC patients with brain metastases.

Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with hematogenous intracranial metastases: case report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Intracranial metastases are rarely clinically diagnosed in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In almost all cases, metastatic locations were found at the cavernous sinus and have been considered to develop as perineural invasions.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We present a case of hypopharyngeal SCC with distant intracranial metastases through hematogenous spreading. Two cerebral parenchymal metastases from the hypopharyngeal SCC were histologically analyzed in a 49-year-old male patient. The right temporal lesion was diagnosed by craniotomy and treated with radiotherapy. The right occipital lesion was treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of hypopharyngeal SCC with cerebral metastases that developed via the hematogenous route. Radiotherapy along with surgery provides better outcomes, and SRS may improve the effect of treatments. Any subclinical neurological deficits should not be neglected, because awareness of this syndrome can lead to earlier diagnosis and alteration in treatment.

Factors related to the local treatment failure of γ knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors

PURPOSE

Radiosurgery (RS) is regarded as a standard therapy for metastatic brain tumors, but local failure requiring repeated therapy for the same lesion remains an unsolved problem. The authors analyzed outcomes of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for metastatic lesions to identify factors of local treatment failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hospital records of 103 patients with a metastatic brain tumor and monitored for more than 6 months were analyzed. Lesion response to RS was analyzed in 77 patients with available gamma plan data. Local treatment failure was defined as lesion regrowth or repeat GKS within 6 months. In cases with multiple lesions, largest masses were evaluated. Primary sites, metastatic location, Karnofsky scale, tumor size, number of metastatic lesions, and various radiosurgical prescription parameters, namely, Paddick's conformity index (CI), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-CI, and gradient index, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 103 study subjects, 58 were male and 45 were female. Primary sites were lung (n = 58), breast (n = 12), colon (n = 6), kidney (n = 7), rectum (n = 6), and others (n = 14). Median survival duration from the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 25 months. Local treatment failure occurred in 14 of 77 the patients (77 lesions) with available gamma plan data. A lung cancer primary site was found to have a lower GKS failure rate than a breast or a renal site (p < 0.05). Lesions with a high Paddicks' CI or a low RTOG-CI had a higher rate of treatment failure (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that primary tumor site and Paddick's CI were related to treatment failure (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases from renal and breast cancers had higher rates of local GKS treatment failure than those from lung cancer. Furthermore, high Paddick's CI revealed higher rate of local recurrence, and was not contributory to prevent local treatment failure. However, the enlargement of the diameter of the tumor after RS in the early follow-up period does not necessarily represent the poor outcome or need of retreatment.

Single-fraction image-guided extracranial radiosurgery for recurrent and metastatic abdominal and pelvic cancers: short-term local control, metabolic response, and toxicity

PURPOSE

Extracranial radiosurgery (ECRS) is a novel treatment for inoperable recurrent or metastatic abdominopelvic cancers. However, local control, metabolic response, and acute toxicity remain undefined. We therefore analyzed these endpoints in patients treated with single-fraction image-guided ECRS at Emory University.

METHODS

20 patients with recurrent or metastatic inoperable abdominal or pelvic cancers (23 sites) were treated with single-fraction ECRS using a Varian linear accelerator between 08/2006 and 02/2008. Patients with pancreas, biliary and liver cancer were part of an IRB-approved ongoing dose-escalation trial. 14 patients had received prior abdominal or pelvic external beam radiation. In 13 patients pre-treatment PET/CT was used to delineate the target volume. Image-guidance was provided by implanted fiducial markers and on-board imaging in 13 patients, and with cone-beam CT in 1 patient. 8 Patients were treated with respiratory gating. The median single-fraction dose delivered was 18 Gy. Each patient was assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after radiosurgery for toxicity, and at approximately 1 month and 3 months with PET/CT for metabolic tumor response. Partial response was defined as a reduction in size of > 10% on CT and a decrease in maximum SUV of > 15% on PET. Complete response was defined as complete resolution on CT, and a reduction of SUV to background levels on PET.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.3 months (range 1.5-12.2 months). The overall response rate (the sum of complete responses and partial responses) by treated site was noted in 36% (1 month), 47% (3 months) and 48% (final). A complete response was achieved in 13% (3 sites). At last follow-up, local control (sum of response rate and stable disease) was 74%. The metabolic response rate by pet only(sum of partial and complete responders) was 85% on final analysis. 23% of pet avid sites achieved a complete response. Two pet avid treated sites (13%) did show evidence of progression at 3 months, but subsequent CT/FDG-PET scans showed a decrease in maximum SUV; no patients suffered progressive disease based on metabolic imaging at last follow-up. Grade 1-2 upper GI acute toxicity (nausea, vomiting, gastritis, and pain) was noted in 47% and 55% of patients at 1 week and 1 month, respectively. Correspondingly, acute lower GI toxicity (diarrhea, pain) was lower at 12% and 6%. Overall grade 1-2 GI toxicity was seen in 59% of patients at 1 week (pain and nausea being the most common) and 61% of patients at 1 month post stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (nausea being the most common).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-fraction image-guided ECRS for recurrent or metastatic abdominopelvic cancers is safe and effective in the short term. 3-month local control was very good , and was predicted by an early metabolic response as seen on PET/CT. Acute side effects were mild, with no patient experiencing grade 3 or greater toxicity. Dose escalation and long-term studies are warranted for this treatment approach.

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT and radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Historically, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been the main treatment for brain metastases. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivers high dose focused radiation and is being increasingly utilized to treat brain metastases. The benefit of adding radiosurgery to WBRT is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of WBRT plus radiosurgery versus WBRT alone in the treatment of of brain metastases.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009) and CancerLit (1975 to 2009) in order to identify trials for inclusion in this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The review was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared use of radiosurgery and WBRT versus WBRT alone for upfront treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed metastases (single or multiple) in the brain resulting from any primary, extracranial cancer

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The Generic Inverse Variance method, random effects model in RevMan 5 was used for the meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

A meta-analysis of two trials with a total of 358 participants, found no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between WBRT plus radiosurgery and WBRT alone groups (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.02). For patients with one brain metastasis median survival was significantly longer in WBRT plus SRS group (6.5 months) versus WBRT group (4.9 months, P = 0.04). Patients in the WBRT plus radiosurgery group had decreased local failure compared to patients who received WBRT alone (HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.52). Furthermore, a statistically significant improvement in performance status scores and decrease in steroid use was seen in the WBRT plus SRS group. Unchanged or improved KPS at 6 months was seen in 43% of patients in the combined therapy group versus only 28% in WBRT group (P = 0.03). Overall, risk of bias in the included studies was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the unclear risk of bias in the included studies, the results of this analysis have to be interpreted with caution. Analysis of all included patients, SRS plus WBRT, did not show a survival benefit over WBRT alone. However, performance status and local control were significantly better in the SRS plus WBRT group. Furthermore, significantly longer OS was reported in the combined treatment group for RPA Class I patients as well as patients with single metastasis.

Treatment strategy for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma: selection of gamma knife surgery or craniotomy for control of growth and peritumoral edema

We retrospectively studied the efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To evaluate the efficacy of GKS for control of peritumoral edema, we retrospectively studied 280 consecutive metastatic brain tumors (100 from lung cancers, 100 from breast cancers, and 80 from RCC) associated with peritumoral edema. In addition, this study included 11 patients with metastatic brain tumors from RCC who underwent direct surgery. The tumor growth control rate of GKS was 84.3%. The extent of edema of RCC metastases was significantly larger than those from lung and breast cancer. Primary site (renal or not renal) and delivered marginal dose (25 Gy or more) were significantly correlated with control of peritumoral edema. All tumors treated by direct surgery were more than 2 cm in maximum diameter. Peritumoral edema at surgery was extensive but disappeared within 1-3 months, and neurological symptoms also improved in many cases. Total removal of brain metastases from RCC was easy with little bleeding in most cases. Our results suggest that GKS is effective for growth control of metastatic brain tumors from RCC. Higher marginal dose such as 25 Gy or more is desirable to obtain peritumoral edema control, so GKS is not suitable for control of symptomatic peritumoral edema associated with relatively large tumors. Tumor removal of RCC metastases is relatively easy and rapidly reduces peritumoral edema. Treatment strategy for metastatic brain tumors from RCC depends on tumor size, number of tumors, and presence of symptomatic peritumoral edema.

Management of single brain metastasis: a practice guideline

QUESTIONS

Should patients with confirmed single brain metastasis undergo surgical resection? Should patients with single brain metastasis undergoing surgical resection receive adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy (wbrt)? What is the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) in the management of patients with single brain metastasis?

PERSPECTIVES

Approximately 15%-30% of patients with cancer will develop cerebral metastases over the course of their disease. Patients identified as having single brain metastasis generally undergo more aggressive treatment than do those with multiple metastases; however, in the province of Ontario, management of patients with single brain metastasis varies. Given that conflicting evidence has been reported, the Neuro-oncology Disease Site Group (dsg) of the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care felt that a systematic review of the evidence and a practice guideline were warranted.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest were survival, local control of disease, quality of life, and adverse effects.

METHODOLOGY

The medline, cancerlit, embase, and Cochrane Library databases and abstracts published in the proceedings of the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997-2005) and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (1998-2004) were systematically searched for relevant evidence. The review included fully published reports or abstracts of randomized controlled trials (rcts), nonrandomized prospective studies, and retrospective studies. The present systematic review and practice guideline has been reviewed and approved by the Neuro-oncology dsg, which comprises medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, neurologists, a nurse, and a patient representative. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through an electronic survey. Final approval of the guideline report was obtained from the Report Approval Panel and the Neuro-oncology dsg.

RESULTS

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE

The literature search found three rcts that compared surgical resection plus wbrt with wbrt alone. In addition, a Cochrane review, including a meta-analysis of published data from those three rcts, was obtained. One rct compared surgical resection plus wbrt with surgical resection alone. One rct compared wbrt plus srs with wbrt alone. Evidence comparing srs with surgical resection or examining srs with or without wbrt was limited to prospective case series and retrospective studies.

BENEFITS

Two of three rcts reported a significant survival benefit for patients who underwent surgical resection as compared with those who received wbrt alone. Pooled results of the three rcts indicated no significant difference in survival or likelihood of dying from neurologic causes; however, significant heterogeneity was detected between the trials. The rct that compared surgical resection plus wbrt with surgical resection alone reported no significant difference in overall survival or length of functional independence; however, tumour recurrence at the site of the metastasis and anywhere in the brain was less frequent in patients who received wbrt as compared with patients in the observation group. In addition, patients who received wbrt were less likely to die from neurologic causes. Results of the rct that compared wbrt plus srs with wbrt alone indicated a significant improvement in median survival in patients who received srs. No quality evidence compares the efficacy of srs with surgical resection or examines the question of whether patients who receive srs should also receive wbrt.

HARMS

Pooled results of the three rcts that examined surgical resection indicated no significant difference in adverse effects between groups. Postoperative complications included respiratory problems, intracerebral hemorrhage, and infection. One rct reported no significant difference in adverse effects between patients who received wbrt plus srs and those who received wbrt alone.

PRACTICE GUIDELINE

TARGET POPULATION

The recommendations that follow apply to adults with confirmed cancer and a single brain metastasis. This practice guideline does not apply to patients with metastatic lymphoma, small-cell lung cancer, germ-cell tumour, leukemia, or sarcoma.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Surgical excision should be considered for patients with good performance status, minimal or no evidence of extracranial disease, and a surgically accessible single brain metastasis amenable to complete excision. Because treatment in cases of single brain metastasis is considered palliative, invasive local treatments must be individualized. Patients with lesions requiring emergency decompression because of intracranial hypertension were excluded from the rcts, but should be considered candidates for surgery. To reduce the risk of tumour recurrence for patients who have undergone resection of a single brain metastasis, postoperative wbrt should be considered. The optimal dose and fractionation schedule for wbrt is 3000 cGy in 10 fractions or 2000 cGy in 5 fractions. As an alternative to surgical resection, wbrt followed by srs boost should be considered for patients with single brain metastasis. The evidence is insufficient to recommend srs alone as a single-modality therapy.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

No high-quality data are available regarding the choice of surgery versus radiosurgery for single brain metastasis. In general, the size and location of the metastasis determine the optimal approach. The standard wbrt regimen for management of patients with single brain metastasis in the United States is 3000 cGy in 10 fractions, and this treatment is usually the standard arm in randomized studies of radiation in patients with brain metastases. Based solely on evidence, the understanding that no reason exists to choose 3000 cGy in 10 fractions over 2000 cGy in 5 fractions is correct; however, fraction size is believed to be important, and therefore 300 cGy daily (3000/10) is believed to be associated with fewer long-term neurocognitive effects than 400 cGy daily (2000/5) in the occasional long-term survivor. For that reason, many radiation oncologists in Ontario prefer 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. No data exist to either support or refute that preference; therefore, finding a resolution to this issue is not currently possible. The Neuro-oncology dsg will update the recommendations as new evidence becomes available.

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

QUESTION

Should patients with newly-diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared with other treatment modalities? Target population These recommendations apply to adults with newly diagnosed solid brain metastases amenable to SRS; lesions amenable to SRS are typically defined as measuring less than 3 cm in maximum diameter and producing minimal (less than 1 cm of midline shift) mass effect. Recommendations SRS plus WBRT vs. WBRT alone Level 1 Single-dose SRS along with WBRT leads to significantly longer patient survival compared with WBRT alone for patients with single metastatic brain tumors who have a KPS > or = 70.Level 1 Single-dose SRS along with WBRT is superior in terms of local tumor control and maintaining functional status when compared to WBRT alone for patients with 1-4 metastatic brain tumors who have a KPS > or =70.Level 2 Single-dose SRS along with WBRT may lead to significantly longer patient survival than WBRT alone for patients with 2-3 metastatic brain tumors.Level 3 There is class III evidence demonstrating that single-dose SRS along with WBRT is superior to WBRT alone for improving patient survival for patients with single or multiple brain metastases and a KPS<70 [corrected].Level 4 There is class III evidence demonstrating that single-dose SRS along with WBRT is superior to WBRT alone for improving patient survival for patients with single or multiple brain metastases and a KPS < 70. SRS plus WBRT vs. SRS alone Level 2 Single-dose SRS alone may provide an equivalent survival advantage for patients with brain metastases compared with WBRT + single-dose SRS. There is conflicting class I and II evidence regarding the risk of both local and distant recurrence when SRS is used in isolation, and class I evidence demonstrates a lower risk of distant recurrence with WBRT; thus, regular careful surveillance is warranted for patients treated with SRS alone in order to provide early identification of local and distant recurrences so that salvage therapy can be initiated at the soonest possible time. Surgical Resection plus WBRT vs. SRS +/- WBRT Level 2 Surgical resection plus WBRT, vs. SRS plus WBRT, both represent effective treatment strategies, resulting in relatively equal survival rates. SRS has not been assessed from an evidence-based standpoint for larger lesions (>3 cm) or for those causing significant mass effect (>1 cm midline shift). Level 3: Underpowered class I evidence along with the preponderance of conflicting class II evidence suggests that SRS alone may provide equivalent functional and survival outcomes compared with resection + WBRT for patients with single brain metastases, so long as ready detection of distant site failure and salvage SRS are possible. SRS alone vs. WBRT alone Level 3 While both single-dose SRS and WBRT are effective for treating patients with brain metastases, single-dose SRS alone appears to be superior to WBRT alone for patients with up to three metastatic brain tumors in terms of patient survival advantage.

Clinical results of cyberknife(r) radiosurgery for spinal metastases

OBJECTIVE

Primary treatment of spinal metastasis has been external beam radiotherapy. Recent advance of technology enables radiosurgery to be extended to extracranial lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery using Cyberknife in spinal metastasis.

METHODS

From June, 2002 to December, 2007, 129 patients with 167 spinal metastases were treated with Cyberknife. Most of the patients (94%) presented with pain and nine patients suffered from motor deficits. Twelve patients were asymptomatic. Fifty-three patients (32%) had previous radiation therapy. Using Cyberknife, 16-39 Gy in 1-5 fractions were delivered to spinal metastatic lesions. Radiation dose was not different regarding the tumor pathology or tumor volume.

RESULTS

After six months follow-up, patient evaluation was possible in 108 lesions. Among them, significant pain relief was seen in 98 lesions (91%). Radiological data were obtained in 83 lesions. The mass size was decreased or stable in 75 lesions and increased in eight lesions. Radiological control failure cases were hepatocellular carcinoma (5 cases), lung cancer (1 case), breast cancer (1 case) and renal cell carcinoma (1 case). Treatment-related radiation injury was not detected.

CONCLUSION

Cyberknife radiosurgery is clinically effective and safe for spinal metastases. It is true even in previously irradiated patients. Compared to conventional radiation therapy, Cyberknife shows higher pain control rate and its treatment process is more convenient for patients. Thus, it can be regarded as a primary treatment modality for spinal metastases.

The developing role for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the non-surgical treatment of brain metastases

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the standard non-surgical treatment for brain metastatic disease, but rarely eradicates bulky metastases from most common cancers. Recent literature has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of delivering very high focal doses of radiation (by radiosurgical techniques) to the gross tumour volume of bulky brain metastases, thereby obtaining more certain local control than is achieved by WBRT. In this paper we report a study of 11 patients with bulky brain metastases in whom an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) facility has been used to concomitantly boost the gross tumour volume of bulky brain metastatic disease (to 40 Gy) during a standard 30 Gy in 10 fractions WBRT schedule. No acute or subacute morbidity was encountered, and good early control data were noted. We discuss the perceived advantages of such a technique.

[Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases]

PURPOSE

A survey of the literature has been performed to find arguments in order to help the choice between radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comparison of two groups of brain metastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery, with or without WBRT was performed. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: there were eight series including 448 patients published from 2000 to 2009; treated with 5-6 MV X-Rays, non invasive head immobilization, a margin 2 to 10mm; 24 to 40Gy in three to five fractions; a 5 to 8 days duration in six series and 15-16 days in two other series. WBRT (30%) ; radiosurgery: there were 12 series (1994 to 2005) including 2157 patients; an invasive head immobilization, no margin; doses from 10 to 25 Gy; six series over 12 had Gamma Knife radiosurgery and six had Linacs X-Rays. WBRT (30 Gy/10 F/12 days) associated to radiosurgery in several series. The following parameters were compared: median GTV, median survival, 1-year survival rate, local control rate, necrosis and WBRT rates.

RESULTS

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy series: the parameters were respectively: 0,52-4,47 cm(3) (median 2,8 cm(3)); 5-16 months (median 8,7 months); 68,2-93% (median 82,5%); necrosis rate 3,1%; associated WBRT 30%. Radiosurgery series: the parameters were respectively: 1,3 to 5,5 cm(3) (median 2 cm(3)); 5,5 to 22 months (median 11 months); 71 to 95% (median 85%); 0,5 to 6% (median 2,4%); associated WBRT 58%. Results seem similar in the two groups: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with non invasive immobilization could theoretically treat all brain metastases sizes except lesions<10 mm (500 mm(3)). In large volumes,>4200 mm(3) GTV, the toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was not reported, thus it was difficult to compare its results with the published reports of radiosurgery toxicity. WBRT was a confusing parameter. Obviously, this initial survey has important limitations, specifically its methodology.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy could be used to treat brain metastases with GTV>500 mm(3) and < or = 4200 mm(3) (Ø 20mm); for GTV<500 mm(3) (Ø 10mm) an invasive procedure with radiosurgery is necessary. For GTV>4200 mm(3) (Ø 20mm), hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy could be proposed, provided further studies, using 4 to 6 Gy fractions, a duration less or equal to 10-12 days and a margin of 2mm will be performed.

Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancer

OBJECT

Brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancers are rare. However, the incidence is increasing because patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma tend to live longer due to earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment of systemic disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of 40 patients (18 women and 22 men) who had undergone GKS to treat a total of 118 metastases from gastrointestinal cancers between January 1996 and December 2006. The mean patient age was 58.7 years, and the mean Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score was 70. There were 7 patients with esophageal cancer, 25 with colon cancer, 5 with rectal cancer, 2 with pancreatic cancer, and 1 with gastric cancer. Nineteen patients were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy and/or local brain radiotherapy before GKS. Twenty-four patients had extracranial metastases, and 3 had an additional primary cancer. The mean metastatic brain tumor volume was 4.3 cm3, and the mean maximum tumor dose varied from 17.1 to 76.7 Gy (mean 41.8 Gy).

RESULTS

Follow-up imaging studies were available in 25 patients with a total of 90 treated metastases. The results demonstrate a tumor control rate of 91%. The median survival time was 6.7 months, and the 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 55 and 25%, respectively. A univariate analysis revealed that the KPS score (<or=70 vs >or=80) was significant (p=0.018) for improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in this series suggest that GKS can be an effective tool for the treatment of brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancer.

Relationship between volume, dose and local control in stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis

The aim of this study is to analyse the efficacy of linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on prognostic factors, local control rate and survival in patients with brain metastasis. Patients with either a single metastasis or up to 4 multiple brain metastases with a maximum tumour diameter of 40 mm for each tumour and a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > or = 70 were eligible for SRS. SRS was applied to 150 lesions in 86 consecutive patients with a median age of 60 years (median 1 and mean 1.7 lesions per patient, mean KPS 86). Median overall survival was 6.2 months after SRS and 9.7 months from diagnosis of brain metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that a KPS of 90 or more (p = 0.009) and female sex (p = 0.003) were associated with a longer survival. Radiation dose < or = 15 Gy (p = 0.017) and KPS < 90 (p = 0.013) were independent predictors of a shorter time to local failure. Five patients showed evidence of radionecrosis with a median survival of 14.8 months. Addition of WBRT neither led to improvement of survival nor to improvement of local control. Improved local control following SRS for brain metastases was associated with KPS > or =90, a radiation dose > 15 Gy and a PTV < 13 cc. The potential of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases of larger volume warrants further study.

A comparison between surgical resection in combination with WBRT or hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation in the treatment of solitary brain metastases

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of solitary brain metastases previously has been tumour resection in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Stereotactic radiotherapy has emerged as a non-invasive treatment option especially for small brain metastases. We now report our results on resection + WBRT or hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation (HCSRT) in the treatment of solitary brain metastases.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2004 patients with metastatic cancer and solitary brain metastases were selected for surgical resection + WBRT or HCSRT alone at the Umeå University Hospital. Fifty-nine patients were treated with surgical resection + WBRT (34 male, 25 female, mean age 63.3 years). Forty-seven patients were treated with HCSRT alone (15 male, 32 female, mean age 64.9 years).

FINDINGS

In patients followed radiologically, 28% treated with resection + WBRT showed a local recurrence after a median time of 8.0 months, whereas there was a lack of local control in 16% in the HCSRT group after a median time of 3.0 months. There was a significantly longer survival time for patients treated with resection + WBRT (median 7.9, mean 12.9 months) compared to HCSRT (median 5.0, mean 7.6 months). Even in patients with a tumour volume <10 cc, there was a significantly longer survival in favour of resection + WBRT (median 8.4, mean 17.4 months) compared to HCSRT (median 5.0, mean 7.9 months).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective and non-randomised study indicates that surgical resection in combination with WBRT may be an option even for small brain metastases suitable for treatment with HCSRT. Since survival and local control following resection + WBRT was at least as favourable as compared to HCSRT alone, tumour location and expected neurological outcome may be the strongest aspect when selecting treatment modality.

Intracranial application of IMRT based radiosurgery to treat multiple or large irregular lesions and verification of infra-red frameless localization system

We have employed a frameless localization system for intracranial radiosurgery, utilizing a custom biteblock with fiducial markers and an infra-red camera for set-up and monitoring patient position. For multiple brain metastases or large irregular lesions, we use a single-isocenter intensity-modulated approach. We report our quality assurance measurements and our experience using Intensity Modulated Radiosurgery (IMRS) to treat such intracranial lesions. A phantom with integrated targets and fiducial markers was utilized to test the positional accuracy of the system. The frameless localization system was used for patient setup and target localization as well as for motion monitoring during treatment. Inverse optimization planning gave satisfactory dose coverage and critical organ sparing. Patient setup was guided by the infrared camera through fine adjustment in three translational and three rotational degrees for isocenter localization and verified by orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) images, taken before treatment to ensure the accuracy of treatment. The relative localization of the camera based system was verified to be highly accurate along three translational directions of couch motion and couch rotation. After verification, we began treating patients with this technique. About 8–12 properly selected fixed beams with a single isocenter were sufficient to achieve good dose coverage and organ sparing. Portal dosimetry with an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) and kV images provided excellent quality assurance for the IMRS plan and patient setup. The treatment time was less than 60 min to deliver doses of 16–20 Gy in a single fraction. The camera-based system was verified for positional accuracy and was deemed sufficiently accurate for stereotactic treatments. Single isocenter IMRS treatment of multiple brain metastases or large irregular lesions can be done within an acceptable treatment time and gives the benefits of dose-conformity and organ-sparing, easy plan QA, and patient setup verification.

Brain metastases in colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Although colorectal cancer is the most common cancer in Singapore, brain metastases associated with colorectal primaries are quite rare, with reported incidences ranging from less than 1% to 4%. This is a review of the incidence, presentation, and prognosis of brain secondaries from colorectal primaries in our institution.

METHODS

From a prospectively collected database, 4378 patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancers between 1995 and 2003. Patients who developed brain metastases were identified and their records reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients who developed brain metastases were identified, for an incidence of 0.62%. Seventy-one percent of the patients had a tumor in the rectum or sigmoid; 92.6% of patients had metachronous brain secondaries. The median interval between surgery for the primary tumor and the discovery of a brain secondary was 27.5 months. The lung was the most common site of concurrent metastatic disease, with the discovery of a brain secondary a median of 9.7 months after diagnosis of the lung lesion. All patients were symptomatic. The majority of the patients received nonsurgical treatment for the brain lesion. Median survival after diagnosis of brain secondaries was 2.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor survival of the patients in our series could be due to late diagnosis. It may be recommended that a brain scan be performed to screen for a brain secondary when lung and/or liver metastases are discovered, especially in a patient with a left-sided cancer. This may lead to earlier diagnosis, amenability to surgical treatment, and improved survival and quality of life.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for patients who initially presented with brain metastases from non-small cell carcinoma

The purpose of this study was retrospectively to evaluate the effectiveness of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for patients who presented with intracranial metastases as the initial symptom of lung carcinoma. Fifteen patients with three or fewer brain metastases from lung carcinoma underwent FSRT receiving 42 Gy in 7 fractions or 40 Gy in 4 fractions from April 1999 to October 2002. Patients who developed new lesions were retreated with FSRT or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Tumor control was obtained in 14 patients during a median period of 21.0 months (ranging from 11 to 34 months) with salvage radiotherapy whenever required. None died from brain metastasis. The median survival time was 7.0+/-3.0 months and 21.0+/-1.0 months for patients with or without extracranial metastases, respectively (p<0.01). Those who received treatment for the primary and mediastinal lymph nodes (22.0+/-1.4 months) survived longer than those who did not (8.0+/-2.5 months) (p<0.001). Overall high local control and high survival rates for the patients suggest that FSRT appears effective and safe in the treatment of patients who present with intracranial metastases as the initial symptom of lung carcinoma. After treatment of intracranial metastases, further therapy for the primary appears to improve survival rates.

Clinical results of stereotactic body frame based fractionated radiation therapy for primary or metastatic thoracic tumors

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for treating primary or metastatic thoracic tumors using a stereotactic body frame. Between January 1998 and February 2004, 101 lesions from 91 patients with thoracic tumors were prospectively reviewed. A dose of 10-12 Gy per fraction was given three to four times over consecutive days to a total dose of 30-48 Gy (median 40 Gy). The overall response rate was 82%, with 20 (22%) complete responses and 55 (60%) partial responses. The one- and two-year local progression free survival rates were 90% and 81%, respectively. The patients who received 48 Gy showed a better local tumor control than those who received less than 48 Gy (Fisher exact test; p = 0.004). No pulmonary complications greater than a RTOG toxicity criteria grade 2 were observed. The experience of stereotactic body frame based radiation therapy appears to be a safe and promising treatment modality for the local management of primary or metastatic lung tumors. The optimal total dose, fractionation schedule and treatment volume need to be determined after a further follow-up of these results.