1
|
Ammirati M. Editorial to accompany manuscript "The TIGR triangle of the Pineal Region: a Virtual Reality Anatomic Study". Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:4093-4094. [PMID: 37945992 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ammirati
- Center for Biotechnology Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Innovative Neurotherapeutic Research Program, Sbarro Health Organization at Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Biolife Science Building, Suite 431, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perlow HK, Prasad RN, Yang M, Klamer B, Matsui J, Marrazzo L, Detti B, Scorsetti M, Clerici E, Arnett A, Beyer S, Ammirati M, Chakravarti A, Raval RR, Brown PD, Navarria P, Scoccianti S, Grecula JC, Palmer JD. Accelerated hypofractionated radiation for elderly or frail patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A pooled analysis of patient-level data from 4 prospective trials. Cancer 2022; 128:2367-2374. [PMID: 35315512 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for elderly or frail patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is 40 Gy in 15 fractions of radiotherapy. However, this regimen has a lower biological effective dose (BED) compared with the Stupp regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. It is hypothesized that accelerated hypofractionated radiation of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions (BED equivalent to Stupp) is safe and efficacious. METHODS Elderly or frail patients with GBM treated with 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions were pooled from 3 phase 1/2 studies and a prospective observational study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were defined time elapsing between surgery/biopsy and death from any cause or progression of disease. RESULTS Sixty-two newly diagnosed patients were eligible for this pooled analysis of individual patient data. The majority (66%) had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score <70. The median age was 73 years. The median OS and PFS were 10.3 and 6.9 months, respectively. Patients with KPS scores ≥70 and <70 had a median OS of 15.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved PFS and OS. Grade 3 neurologic toxicity was seen in 2 patients (3.2%). There was no grade 4/5 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS This is the only analysis of elderly/frail patients with GBM prospectively treated with a hypofractionated radiation regimen that is isoeffective to the Stupp regimen. Treatment was well tolerated and demonstrated excellent OS and PFS compared with historical studies. This regimen gives the elderly/frail population an alternative to regimens with a lower BED. Randomized trials are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mike Yang
- Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Brett Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Livia Marrazzo
- Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sasha Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - John C Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perlow HK, Yaney A, Yang M, Klamer B, Matsui J, Raval RR, Blakaj DM, Arnett A, Beyer S, Elder JB, Ammirati M, Lonser R, Hardesty D, Ong S, Giglio P, Pillainayagam C, Goranovich J, Grecula J, Chakravarti A, Gondi V, Brown PD, Palmer JD. Dose-escalated accelerated hypofractionation for elderly or frail patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2022; 156:399-406. [PMID: 35013838 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03925-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for elderly glioblastoma patients is 40 Gy in 15 fraction radiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). However, this regimen has a lower biologic equivalent dose (BED) compared to the Stupp regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. We hypothesize that accelerated hypofractionated radiation of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions (BED equivalent to Stupp) will have superior survival compared to 40 Gy in 15 fractions. METHODS Elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) who received hypofractionated radiation with TMZ from 2010 to 2020 were included in this analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival were defined as the time elapsed between surgery/biopsy and death from any cause or progression. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients who received 40 and 52.5 Gy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS Sixty-six newly diagnosed patients were eligible for analysis. Thirty-nine patients were treated with 40 Gy in 15 fractions while twenty-seven were treated with 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions. Patients had no significant differences in age, sex, methylation status, or performance status. OS was superior in the 52.5 Gy group (14.1 months) when compared to the 40 Gy group (7.9 months, p = 0.011). Isoeffective dosing to 52.5 Gy was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for improved OS on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Isoeffective dosing to 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions was associated with superior OS compared to standard of care 40 Gy in 15 fractions. These hypothesis generating data support accelerated hypofractionation in future prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Alexander Yaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Michael Yang
- Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brett Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Sasha Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - James B Elder
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Russell Lonser
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Douglas Hardesty
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shirley Ong
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Pierre Giglio
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Clement Pillainayagam
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Justin Goranovich
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville, Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, IL, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Cinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 460 W. 10th Avenue43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perlow H, Yang M, Klamer B, Matsui J, Marrazzo L, Detti B, Scorrsetti M, Clerici E, Arnett A, Beyer S, Ammirati M, Chakravarti A, Raval R, Navarria P, Scoccianti S, Grecula J, Palmer J. CTNI-37. ISOEFFECTIVE HYPOFRACTIONATION FOR ELDERLY OR FRAIL PATIENTS WITH A NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A POOLED INTERNATIONAL STUDY. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE
The standard of care (SOC) for elderly or frail glioblastoma (GBM) patients is 40 Gy in 15 fraction radiotherapy. However, this regimen has a lower BED compared to the Stupp regimen, 60 Gy in 30 fractions. We hypothesize that isoeffective hypofractionated radiation of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions (BED equivalent to Stupp) will have superior survival compared to standard of care.
METHODS
Elderly GBM patients treated with 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions were pooled from 2 phase II studies, 1 phase 1 and a prospective observation study. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were defined as the time elapsed between surgery/biopsy and death from any cause or progression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS
62 newly-diagnosed patients were eligible for this analysis. Median follow-up was 10 months. The median OS and PFS was 10.3 and 6.9 mos, respectively. Patients with KPS ≥ 70 and < 70 had a median OS of 15.3 and 9.5 mos. No survival difference was seen between unmethylated and methylated patients with a median OS of 10.2 and 10.3 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that concurrent chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved PFS and OS. Grade 3 neurologic toxicity was seen in 2 patients (3.2%).
CONCLUSION
This is the first pooled, prospective analysis of elderly/frail GBM patients treated with dose-escalated hypofractionated radiation. Treatment was well tolerated and demonstrated excellent OS and PFS, exceeding that from prior elderly trials (Roa; 6.5 mo [poor KPS]/Perry; 9.3mo [good KPS]). This treatment regimen gives the elderly population an alternative to Stupp that is not de-escalating therapy. Future prospective trials are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Michael Yang
- Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, USA
| | - Brett Klamer
- The Ohio State University, Center for Biostatistics, Columbus, USA
| | | | - Livia Marrazzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Scorrsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Sasha Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Raju Raval
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Joshua Palmer
- The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ammirati M. Technological innovation and neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:2093. [PMID: 34101023 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04854-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ammirati
- Center for Biotechnology Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Innovative Neurotherapeutic Research Program Sbarro Health Organization at Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Biolife Science Building, Suite 431, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ammirati
- Center for Biotechnology Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Biolife Science Building, Suite 431, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
- Innovative Neurotherapeutic Research Program, Sbarro Health Organization at Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Biolife Science Building, Suite 431, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mavarez-Martinez A, Israelyan LA, Soghomonyan S, Fiorda-Diaz J, Sandhu G, Shimansky VN, Ammirati M, Palettas M, Lubnin AY, Bergese SD. The Effects of Patient Positioning on the Outcome During Posterior Cranial Fossa and Pineal Region Surgery. Front Surg 2020; 7:9. [PMID: 32232048 PMCID: PMC7082226 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Surgery on posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and pineal region (PR) carries the risks of intraoperative trauma to the brainstem structures, blood loss, venous air embolism (VAE), cardiovascular instability, and other complications. Success in surgery, among other factors, depends on selecting the optimal patient position. Our objective was to find associations between patient positioning, incidence of intraoperative complications, neurological recovery, and the extent of surgery. Methods: This observational study was conducted in two medical centers: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (USA) and The Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (Russian Federation). Patients were distributed in two groups based on the surgical position: sitting position (SP) or horizontal position (HP). The inclusion criteria were adult patients with space-occupying or vascular lesions requiring an open PCF or PR surgery. Perioperative variables were recorded and summarized using descriptive statistics. The post-treatment survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 3 months. Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the study: 53 in SP and 56 in HP. A higher proportion of patients in the HP patients had >300 mL intraoperative blood loss compared to the SP group (32 vs. 13%; p = 0.0250). Intraoperative VAE was diagnosed in 40% of SP patients vs. 0% in the HP group (p < 0.0001). However, trans-esophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring was more common in the SP group. Intraoperative hypotension was documented in 28% of SP patients compared to 9% in HP group (p = 0.0126). A higher proportion of SP patients experienced a new neurological symptom compared to the HP group (49 vs. 29%; p = 0.0281). The extent of tumor resection, postoperative 3-months survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were not different in the groups. Conclusions: The SP was associated with, less intraoperative bleeding, increased intraoperative hypotension, VAE, and postoperative neurological deficit. More HP patients experienced macroglossia and increased blood loss. At 3 months, there was no difference of parameters between the two groups. Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: registration number NCT03364283.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Mavarez-Martinez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| | - Lusine A Israelyan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Suren Soghomonyan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Juan Fiorda-Diaz
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Gurneet Sandhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Vadim N Shimansky
- Department of Posterior Cranial Fossa and Scull Base Surgery, Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mercy Health St. Rita Medical Center, Lima, OH, United States.,Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Sbarro Health Organization, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Marilly Palettas
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Andrei Yu Lubnin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergio D Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ammirati M, Nahed BV, Andrews D, Chen CC, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on Treatment Options for Adults With Multiple Metastatic Brain Tumors. Neurosurgery 2019; 84:E180-E182. [PMID: 30629219 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients newly diagnosed with multiple (more than 1) brain metastases. QUESTION 1 In what circumstances should whole brain radiation therapy be recommended to improve tumor control and survival in patients with multiple brain metastases? RECOMMENDATION Level 2: It is recommended that whole brain radiation therapy can be added to stereotactic radiosurgery to improve local and distant control keeping in mind the potential for worsened neurocognitive outcomes and that there is unlikely to be a significant impact on overall survival. QUESTION 2 In what circumstances should stereotactic radiosurgery be recommended to improve tumor control and survival in patients with multiple brain metastases? RECOMMENDATIONS Level 1: In patients with 2 to 3 brain metastases not amenable to surgery, the addition of stereotactic radiosurgery to whole brain radiation therapy is not recommended to improve survival beyond that obtained with whole brain radiation therapy alone. Level 3: The use of stereotactic radiosurgery alone is recommended to improve median overall survival for patients with more than 4 metastases having a cumulative volume < 7 cc. QUESTION 3 In what circumstances should surgery be recommended to improve tumor control and survival in patients with multiple brain metastases? RECOMMENDATION Level 3: In patients with multiple brain metastases, tumor resection is recommended in patients with lesions inducing symptoms from mass effect that can be reached without inducing new neurological deficit and who have control of their cancer outside the nervous system.The full guideline can be found at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Rita Medical Center, Lima, Ohio.,Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology and Sbarro Health Research Organization, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Brian V Nahed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Andrews
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rubiano AM, Carney N, Khan AA, Ammirati M. The Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Context of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Summary of Results and Analysis of the Confidence Level of Conclusions From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Front Neurol 2019; 10:1063. [PMID: 31649610 PMCID: PMC6795698 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global epidemic. The incidence of TBI in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is three times greater than in high-income countries (HICs). Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) and prevent secondary injury. Multiple comparative studies, and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to investigate the influence of DC for patients with severe TBI on outcomes such as mortality, ICP, neurological outcomes, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. The results of these studies are inconsistent. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted in an effort to aggregate the data from the individual studies, and perhaps derive reliable conclusions. The purpose of this project was to conduct a review of the reviews about the effectiveness of DC to improve outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify reviews and meta-analyses that met our pre-determined criteria. We used the AMSTAR 2 instrument to assess the quality of each of the included reviews, and determine the level of confidence. Results: Of 973 citations from the original search, five publications were included in our review. Four of them included meta-analyses. For mortality, three reviews found a positive effect of DC compared to medical management and two found no significant difference between groups. The four reviews that measured neurological outcome found no benefit of DC. The two reviews that assessed ICP both found DC to be beneficial in reducing ICP. DC demonstrated a significant reduction in ICU length of stay in the one study that measured it, and a significant reduction in hospital length of stay in the two studies that measured it. According to the AMSTAR 2 criteria, the five reviews ranged in levels of confidence from low to critically low. Conclusion: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are important approaches for aggregating information from multiple studies. Clinicians rely of these methods for concise interpretation of scientific literature. Standards for quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been established to support the quality of the reviews being produced. In the case of DC, more attention must be paid to quality standards, in the generation of both individual studies and reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés M Rubiano
- INUB/MEDITECH Research Group, El Bosque University, Bogota, Colombia.,NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, MEDITECH Foundation, Cali, Colombia
| | - Nancy Carney
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Ahsan A Khan
- NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, MEDITECH Foundation, Cali, Colombia
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Center for Biotechnology, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Innovative Neurotherapeutic Research Program Sbarro Health Organization, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nahed BV, Alvarez-Breckenridge C, Brastianos PK, Shih H, Sloan A, Ammirati M, Kuo JS, Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Role of Surgery in the Management of Adults With Metastatic Brain Tumors. Neurosurgery 2019; 84:E152-E155. [PMID: 30629227 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Please see the full-text version of this guideline https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_2) for the target population of each recommendation listed below. SURGERY FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS AT NEW DIAGNOSIS QUESTION: Should patients with newly diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT)? RECOMMENDATIONS Level 1: Surgery + WBRT is recommended as first-line treatment in patients with single brain metastases with favorable performance status and limited extracranial disease to extend overall survival, median survival, and local control. Level 3: Surgery plus SRS is recommended to provide survival benefit in patients with metastatic brain tumors Level 3: Multimodal treatments including either surgery + WBRT + SRS boost or surgery + WBRT are recommended as alternatives to WBRT + SRS in terms of providing overall survival and local control benefits. SURGERY AND RADIATION FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS QUESTION: Should patients with newly diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo surgical resection followed by WBRT, SRS, or another combination of these modalities? RECOMMENDATIONS Level 1: Surgery + WBRT is recommended as superior treatment to WBRT alone in patients with single brain metastases. Level 3: Surgery + SRS is recommended as an alternative to treatment with SRS alone to benefit overall survival. Level 3: It is recommended that SRS alone be considered equivalent to surgery + WBRT. SURGERY FOR RECURRENT METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS QUESTION: Should patients with recurrent metastatic brain tumors undergo surgical resection? RECOMMENDATIONS Level 3: Craniotomy is recommended as a treatment for intracranial recurrence after initial surgery or SRS. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND RECURRENCE QUESTION A: Does the surgical technique (en bloc resection or piecemeal resection) affect recurrence? RECOMMENDATION Level 3: En bloc tumor resection, as opposed to piecemeal resection, is recommended to decrease the risk of postoperative leptomeningeal disease when resecting single brain metastases. QUESTION B Does the extent of surgical resection (gross total resection or subtotal resection) affect recurrence? RECOMMENDATION Level 3: Gross total resection is recommended over subtotal resection in recursive partitioning analysis class I patients to improve overall survival and prolong time to recurrence. The full guideline can be found at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian V Nahed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Helen Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Sloan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Rita Medical Center, Lima, Ohio.,Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology and Sbarro Health Research Organization, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John S Kuo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Mulva Clinic for the Neurosciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Timothy C Ryken
- Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Steven N Kalkanis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Parupudi T, Rahimi R, Ammirati M, Sundararajan R, Garner AL, Ziaie B. Fabrication and characterization of implantable flushable electrodes for electric field-mediated drug delivery in a brain tissue-mimic agarose gel. Electrophoresis 2018; 39:2262-2269. [PMID: 29947027 DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tejasvi Parupudi
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
| | - Rahim Rahimi
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
- Birck Nanotechnology Center; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurological Surgery; The Ohio State University; Wexner Medical Center; Columbus OH USA
| | - Raji Sundararajan
- School of Engineering Technology; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
| | - Allen L. Garner
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
- School of Nuclear Engineering; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
- Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
| | - Babak Ziaie
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
- Birck Nanotechnology Center; Purdue University; West Lafayette IN USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ammirati M, Baehring J, Brem H, Butowski N, Fenstermaker RA, Forsyth P, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Holdhoff M, Howard S, Junck L, Kaley T, Kumthekar P, Loeffler JS, Moots PL, Mrugala MM, Nagpal S, Pandey M, Parney I, Peters K, Puduvalli VK, Ragsdale J, Rockhill J, Rogers L, Rusthoven C, Shonka N, Shrieve DC, Sills AK, Swinnen LJ, Tsien C, Weiss S, Wen PY, Willmarth N, Bergman MA, Engh A. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 15:1331-1345. [PMID: 29118226 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
For many years, the diagnosis and classification of gliomas have been based on histology. Although studies including large populations of patients demonstrated the prognostic value of histologic phenotype, variability in outcomes within histologic groups limited the utility of this system. Nonetheless, histology was the only proven and widely accessible tool available at the time, thus it was used for clinical trial entry criteria, and therefore determined the recommended treatment options. Research to identify molecular changes that underlie glioma progression has led to the discovery of molecular features that have greater diagnostic and prognostic value than histology. Analyses of these molecular markers across populations from randomized clinical trials have shown that some of these markers are also predictive of response to specific types of treatment, which has prompted significant changes to the recommended treatment options for grade III (anaplastic) gliomas.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dauki A, Lei H, Yonghua L, Sekhon A, Kendra KL, Cavaliere R, WELLIVER MXU, McGregor J, Wei L, Mrozek E, Olencki T, Thelen J, Prevedello D, Thoman W, Matharbootham M, Ammirati M, Coss CC, Grecula JC, Phelps MA. Drug quantification in metastatic brain tumors in patients receiving bendamustine as a radiosensitizer for stereotactic radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e14017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - He Lei
- Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, US
| | | | | | - Kari Lynn Kendra
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Lai Wei
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ewa Mrozek
- The Ohio State University Medical Center James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Thomas Olencki
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu P, Colasanti R, Lee J, Scerrati A, Ercan S, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Quantitative evaluation of different far lateral approaches to the cranio-vertebral junction using the microscope and the endoscope: a cadaveric study using a tumor model. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160:695-705. [PMID: 29479657 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-018-3502-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several far lateral approaches have been proposed to deal with cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) tumors including the basic, transcondylar, and supracondylar far lateral approaches (B-FLA, T-FLA, and S-FLA). However, the indications on when to use one versus the other are not well systematized yet. Our purpose is to evaluate in an experimental cadaveric setting which approach is best suited to remove tumors of different sizes. METHODS We implanted at the CVJ, using a transoral approach, tumor models of different sizes (five 1-cm3 and five 3-cm3 tumors) in ten embalmed cadaveric heads. The artificial tumors were exposed via the three approaches using endoscopic-assisted microneurosurgical technique and neuronavigation. The skull base area exposed and the maneuverability linked to each approach were evaluated using neuronavigation. RESULTS In 1-cm3 tumors, the T-FLA and the S-FLA exposed a significantly larger skull base area than the B-FLA both using the microscope and the endoscope (P < 0.05); the T-FLA executed with the microscope provided wider vertical and horizontal maneuverability than the B-FLA (P = 0.030 and 0.017, respectively); the S-FLA executed with the endoscope provided wider vertical maneuverability than the T-FLA (P = 0.031). The S-FLA executed using the microscope and the endoscope provided wider vertical maneuverability than the B-FLA both in 1 and 3-cm3 tumors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In 1-cm3 tumors, the S-FLA and the T-FLA expose a wider skull base area than the B-FLA. In larger tumors, the exposure is similar for all three approaches. Use of the endoscope in an assistive mode may further increase the surgical exposure and maneuverability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
- The Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Roberto Colasanti
- The Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Umberto I General Hospital, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Jungshun Lee
- The Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Alba Scerrati
- The Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Serdar Ercan
- The Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- The Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mercy Health/St. Rita Medical Center, 770 W High Street, Suite 220, Lima, OH, 45806, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ammirati M. Innovation in neurosurgery response to: "Ideal", the operating microscope, and the parachute. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160:371. [PMID: 29250723 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-017-3427-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
|
17
|
Castlen JP, Cote DJ, Moojen WA, Robe PA, Balak N, Brennum J, Ammirati M, Mathiesen T, Broekman ML. The Changing Health Care Landscape and Implications of Organizational Ethics on Modern Medical Practice. World Neurosurg 2017; 102:420-424. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
18
|
Cote DJ, Bredenoord AL, Smith TR, Ammirati M, Brennum J, Mendez I, Ammar AS, Balak N, Bolles G, Esene IN, Mathiesen T, Broekman ML. Ethical clinical translation of stem cell interventions for neurologic disease. Neurology 2016; 88:322-328. [PMID: 27927932 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The application of stem cell transplants in clinical practice has increased in frequency in recent years. Many of the stem cell transplants in neurologic diseases, including stroke, Parkinson disease, spinal cord injury, and demyelinating diseases, are unproven-they have not been tested in prospective, controlled clinical trials and have not become accepted therapies. Stem cell transplant procedures currently being carried out have therapeutic aims, but are frequently experimental and unregulated, and could potentially put patients at risk. In some cases, patients undergoing such operations are not included in a clinical trial, and do not provide genuinely informed consent. For these reasons and others, some current stem cell interventions for neurologic diseases are ethically dubious and could jeopardize progress in the field. We provide discussion points for the evaluation of new stem cell interventions for neurologic disease, based primarily on the new Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation released by the International Society for Stem Cell Research in May 2016. Important considerations in the ethical translation of stem cells to clinical practice include regulatory oversight, conflicts of interest, data sharing, the nature of investigation (e.g., within vs outside of a clinical trial), informed consent, risk-benefit ratios, the therapeutic misconception, and patient vulnerability. To help guide the translation of stem cells from the laboratory into the neurosurgical clinic in an ethically sound manner, we present an ethical discussion of these major issues at stake in the field of stem cell clinical research for neurologic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Cote
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Timothy R Smith
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Mario Ammirati
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Jannick Brennum
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ivar Mendez
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ahmed S Ammar
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Naci Balak
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Gene Bolles
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ignatius Ngene Esene
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Tiit Mathiesen
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Marike L Broekman
- From Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery (D.J.C., T.R.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center (A.L.B.), and Department of Neurosurgery (M.L.B.), University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.), Ohio State University, Columbus; Copenhagen Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Centre (J.B.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Department of Surgery (I.M.), and Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Dammam College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurosurgery (N.B.), Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery (G.B.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Neurosurgery (I.N.E.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Neurosurgery (T.M.), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Neurology (M.L.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee JS, Tailor ARA, Lamki T, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Properties and Storage Methods of the Stratathane ST-504–Based Neurosurgical Tumor Model: Comprehensive Analysis. World Neurosurg 2016; 96:350-354. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2016] [Revised: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
20
|
Ercan S, Scerrati A, Wu P, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Is less always better? Keyhole and standard subtemporal approaches: evaluation of temporal lobe retraction and surgical volume with and without zygomatic osteotomy in a cadaveric model. J Neurosurg 2016; 127:157-164. [PMID: 27636184 DOI: 10.3171/2016.6.jns16663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The subtemporal approach is one of the surgical routes used to reach the interpeduncular fossa. Keyhole subtemporal approaches and zygomatic arch osteotomy have been proposed in an effort to decrease the amount of temporal lobe retraction. However, the effects of these modified subtemporal approaches on temporal lobe retraction have never been objectively validated. METHODS A keyhole and a classic subtemporal craniotomy were executed in 4 fresh-frozen silicone-injected cadaver heads. The target was defined as the area bordered by the superior cerebellar artery, the anterior clinoid process, supraclinoid internal carotid artery, and the posterior cerebral artery. Once the target was fully visualized, the authors evaluated the amount of temporal lobe retraction by measuring the distance between the base of the middle fossa and the temporal lobe. In addition, the volume of the surgical and anatomical corridors was assessed as well as the surgical maneuverability using navigation and 3D moldings. The same evaluation was conducted after a zygomatic osteotomy was added to the two approaches. RESULTS Temporal lobe retraction was the same in the two approaches evaluated while the surgical corridor and the maneuverability were all greater in the classic subtemporal approach. CONCLUSIONS The zygomatic arch osteotomy facilitates the maneuverability and the surgical volume in both approaches, but the temporal lobe retraction benefit is confined to the lateral part of the middle fossa skull base and does not result in the retraction necessary to expose the selected target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serdar Ercan
- Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Alba Scerrati
- Catholic University, Institute of Neurosurgery, Rome, Italy
| | - Phengfei Wu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Department of Neurosurgery, Shenyang, Lianoning, China; and
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ammirati M, Baehring J, Brem H, Brown P, Butowski N, Chamberlain MC, Fenstermaker RA, Friedman A, Gilbert MR, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Holdhoff M, Junck L, Kaley T, Lawson R, Loeffler JS, Lovely MP, Moots PL, Mrugala MM, Newton HB, Parney I, Raizer JJ, Recht L, Shonka N, Shrieve DC, Sills AK, Swinnen LJ, Tran D, Tran N, Vrionis FD, Weiss S, Wen PY, McMillian N, Engh AM. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016; 13:1191-202. [PMID: 26483059 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers provide interdisciplinary recommendations for managing adult CNS cancers. Primary and metastatic brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with varied outcomes and management strategies. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN CNS Cancers Panel's discussion and highlight notable changes in the 2015 update. This article outlines the data and provides insight into panel decisions regarding adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy treatment options for high-risk newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas and glioblastomas. Additionally, it describes the panel's assessment of new data and the ongoing debate regarding the use of alternating electric field therapy for high-grade gliomas.
Collapse
|
22
|
Colasanti R, Tailor ARA, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Expanding the Horizon of the Suboccipital Retrosigmoid Approach to the Middle Incisural Space by Cutting the Tentorium Cerebelli: Anatomic Study and Illustration of 2 Cases. World Neurosurg 2016; 92:303-312. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
23
|
Drusco A, Bottoni A, Laganà A, Acunzo M, Fassan M, Cascione L, Antenucci A, Kumchala P, Vicentini C, Gardiman MP, Alder H, Carosi MA, Ammirati M, Gherardi S, Luscrì M, Carapella C, Zanesi N, Croce CM. A differentially expressed set of microRNAs in cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) can diagnose CNS malignancies. Oncotarget 2016; 6:20829-39. [PMID: 26246487 PMCID: PMC4673232 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Central Nervous System malignancies often require stereotactic biopsy or biopsy for differential diagnosis, and for tumor staging and grading. Furthermore, stereotactic biopsy can be non-diagnostic or underestimate grading. Hence, there is a compelling need of new diagnostic biomarkers to avoid such invasive procedures. Several biological markers have been proposed, but they can only identify specific prognostic subtype of Central Nervous System tumors, and none of them has found a standardized clinical application.The aim of the study was to identify a Cerebro-Spinal Fluid microRNA signature that could differentiate among Central Nervous System malignancies.CSF total RNA of 34 neoplastic and of 14 non-diseased patients was processed by NanoString. Comparison among groups (Normal, Benign, Glioblastoma, Medulloblastoma, Metastasis and Lymphoma) lead to the identification of a microRNA profile that was further confirmed by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization.Hsa-miR-451, -711, 935, -223 and -125b were significantly differentially expressed among the above mentioned groups, allowing us to draw an hypothetical diagnostic chart for Central Nervous System malignancies.This is the first study to employ the NanoString technique for Cerebro-Spinal Fluid microRNA profiling. In this article, we demonstrated that Cerebro-Spinal Fluid microRNA profiling mirrors Central Nervous System physiologic or pathologic conditions. Although more cases need to be tested, we identified a diagnostic Cerebro-Spinal Fluid microRNA signature with good perspectives for future diagnostic clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alessandro Laganà
- Dept. of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario Acunzo
- MVIMG, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Dept. of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Luciano Cascione
- Lymphoma & Genomics Research Program, IOR Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland.,IOSI Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Anna Antenucci
- UOSD of Clinical Pathology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Caterina Vicentini
- ARC-NET Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marina P Gardiman
- Dept. of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Mario Ammirati
- Dept. of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University, OH, USA
| | | | - Marilena Luscrì
- Dept. of Anesthesiology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Scerrati A, Ercan S, Wu P, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Intrapetrous Internal Carotid Artery: Evaluation of Exposure, Mobilization and Surgical Maneuvers Feasibility from a Retrosigmoid Approach in a Cadaveric Model. World Neurosurg 2016; 91:443-50. [PMID: 27126909 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide a quantification of the exposure of the vertical and horizontal segments of the intrapetrous carotid artery (IPCA) and to evaluate the possibilities of its mobilization and of performing surgical maneuvers on it using the retrosigmoid approach. METHODS Twelve surgical dissections were performed bilaterally on 6 fresh cadavers. Predissection computed tomography (CT) scans with bone fiducials for intraoperative navigation were acquired. A retrosigmoid craniectomy was performed. The inframeatal space was drilled, the horizontal (HoIPCA) and vertical (VeIPCA) segments of the IPCA were exposed, and their measurements were recorded. The carotid canal was enlarged, the artery was carefully detached from the bone, and a vessel loop was inserted in order to mobilize its horizontal segment. Afterwards we performed different surgical maneuvers: We inflated a 5-French Fogarty balloon to compress the IPCA and repaired a 7-mm arteriotomy with a running suture. Specimens underwent a new CT scan to evaluate the amount of bone removal and the integrity of the inner ear structures. RESULTS The HoIPCA and VeIPCA were exposed and anatomically preserved in all specimens without injuring the surrounding neurovascular structures. The HoIPCA presented an average length of 24.89 mm (range: 19.41-31.47 mm), and the VeIPCA presented an average length of 10.07 mm (range: 8.92-11.58 mm). The possibility of IPCA mobilization and the feasibility of performing surgical maneuvers were demonstrated. Postdissection CT scan showed the preservation of inner ear structures. CONCLUSION Exposure and mobilization of the IPCA using a retrosigmoid approach are feasible and could represent a viable option for the possibility of reaching a total resection of selected skull base tumors, even when involvement of the carotid canal is present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Scerrati
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Serdar Ercan
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Pengfei Wu
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University Heping District, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lee JS, Scerrati A, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Quantitative analysis of surgical exposure and surgical freedom to the anterosuperior pons: comparison of pterional transtentorial, orbitozygomatic, and anterior petrosal approaches. Neurosurg Rev 2016; 39:599-605. [PMID: 27075862 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-016-0710-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical approaches to the pons lump together different areas of the pons, such as the anterosuperior and the anteroinferior pons. These areas are topographically different, and different approaches may be best suited for one or the other area. We evaluated the exposure of the anterosuperior pons using different surgical approaches. We quantify the surgical exposure and surgical freedom to the anterosuperior pons afforded by the pterional transtentorial (PT), the orbitozygomatic with anterior clinoidectomy (OZ), and the anterior petrosal (AP) approaches. Five embalmed cadaver heads were used. The three approaches were executed on each side, for a total of 30 approaches. The area of maximal exposure of the anterosuperior pons was measured with the aid of neuronavigation. We also evaluated the feasible angles of approach in the vertical and horizontal planes. We were able to successfully expose the anterosuperior pons using all the selected approaches. In the PT and OZ approaches, mobilization of the sphenoparietal sinus can prevent over-retraction of the temporal bridging veins, while use of the endoscope can help in preserving the integrity of the fourth nerve while cutting the tentorium. The mean exposure area was largest for the AP and smallest for the PT; the surgical freedom was similar among all the approaches. However, there was no statistically significant difference among all the approaches in the exposure area or in the surgical freedom. There is no significant difference among the three evaluated approaches in exposure of the anterosuperior pons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-Shun Lee
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alba Scerrati
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, N1025 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Scerrati A, Lee JS, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Exposing the Fundus of the Internal Acoustic Meatus without Entering the Labyrinth Using a Retrosigmoid Approach: Is It Possible? World Neurosurg 2016; 91:357-64. [PMID: 27083131 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2015] [Revised: 03/25/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of performing a labyrinth-sparing neuronavigation-assisted retrosigmoid approach to the fundus of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and to describe the anatomy of the structures embedded in the posterior meatal wall. METHODS Ten surgical dissections were performed bilaterally on 5 fresh cadavers. Cadavers were subjected to preoperative computed tomography scans and spatial coordinates of inner ear structures were recorded. A retrosigmoid craniectomy was performed. The IAM was drilled towards the fundus until no more than 1 mm of bone covered the labyrinthine structures. Specimens underwent a new computed tomography scan to verify the length of opened IAM and the status of the labyrinth. We then opened the labyrinthine structures and recorded their coordinates using navigation. These were compared with the radiologic coordinates to verify the neuronavigation accuracy. RESULTS In 9 sides, the IAM was opened to the fundus without injuring the labyrinth; in 1 side, the vestibule was opened. The mean residual bone on the fundus was 0.97 mm. The average length of the accessible IAM was 88.95%. The best accuracy of the navigation was for the identification of the common crus, with a mean value of 0.73 mm. CONCLUSIONS This surgical technique could facilitate the opening of the IAM with preservation of inner ear structures. We opened a mean of 88.95% of the IAM without entering the labyrinthine structures in 90% of cases. These results confirm the feasibility of the retrosigmoid approach for the exposure of the IAM fundus with preservation of labyrinthine structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Scerrati
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University of Rome, Policlinico A.Gemelli, Rome, Italy; Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jung-Shun Lee
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Colasanti R, Tailor ARA, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Functional Petrosectomy Via a Suboccipital Retrosigmoid Approach: Guidelines and Topography. World Neurosurg 2016; 87:143-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2015] [Revised: 11/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Lee JS, Tailor AR, Lamki T, Zhang J, Irani S, Ammirati M. Petroclival tumor model--technical note and educational implications. Neurosurg Rev 2015; 39:251-7; discussion 257-8. [PMID: 26621677 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0683-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2015] [Revised: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Petroclival area lesions are rare, and their surgery is challenging due to the deep location and to the complex relationships between the tumor and the neurovascular structures. The objective is to present a petroclival tumor model simulating the distorted anatomy of a real petroclival lesion and propose its use to practice microsurgical removal while preserving neurovascular structures. Four embalmed cadaver heads were used in this study. An endoscopic endonasal transclival approach was used to access the dura in front of the trigeminal nerve; a pediatric Foley was inserted above the trigeminal nerve and was gradually inflated (one-balloon technique). If a larger tumor model was desired, an additional balloon was placed below the trigeminal nerve (two-balloon technique). A pre-mixed tumor polymer was injected into the petroclival space and allowed to harden to create an implanted tumor. A post-implant CT scan was done to evaluate the location and volume of the implanted artificial tumor. Tumors were subsequently excised via retrosigmoid and anterior petrosal approaches. Six petroclival tumors were successfully developed: three were small (9.41-10.36 ml) and three large (21.05-23.99 ml). During dissection, distorted anatomy created by the tumor model mimicked that of real surgery. We have established a petroclival tumor model with adjustable size which offers opportunities to study the distorted anatomy of the area and that is able to be used as a training tool to practice microsurgical removal of petroclival lesions. The practice dissection of this tumor model can be a bridge between a normal anatomic dissection and real surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-Shun Lee
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Al-Rahim Tailor
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tariq Lamki
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shahriar Irani
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Puduvalli V, Giglio P, Lehman N, Ammirati M, Prevedello D, Slone W, Otero J, Huntoon K, Cunningham H, Cavezza S. RARE-18EXCEPTIONAL RESPONDERS: A PERSONALIZED APPROACH TO TARGETED TREATMENT OF UNCOMMON BRAIN TUMORS. Neuro Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov232.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
30
|
Filipce V, Ammirati M. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Working Area Obtained by the Microscope and Endoscope in Different Surgical Approaches to the Acom and BA Region. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
31
|
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ammirati M, Brem H, Brown P, Butowski N, Chamberlain MC, DeAngelis LM, Fenstermaker RA, Friedman A, Gilbert MR, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Hesser D, Holdhoff M, Junck L, Lawson R, Loeffler JS, Moots PL, Mrugala MM, Newton HB, Raizer JJ, Recht L, Shonka N, Shrieve DC, Sills AK, Swinnen LJ, Tran D, Tran N, Vrionis FD, Wen PY, McMillian NR, Ho M. Central nervous system cancers, version 2.2014. Featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 12:1517-23. [PMID: 25361798 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System Cancers provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with cancers of the central nervous system. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight recent updates regarding the management of metastatic brain tumors using radiation therapy. Use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is no longer limited to patients with 3 or fewer lesions, because data suggest that total disease burden, rather than number of lesions, is predictive of survival benefits associated with the technique. SRS is increasingly becoming an integral part of management of patients with controlled, low-volume brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Burt Nabors
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Jana Portnow
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Mario Ammirati
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Henry Brem
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Paul Brown
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Nicholas Butowski
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Marc C Chamberlain
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Robert A Fenstermaker
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Allan Friedman
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Jona Hattangadi-Gluth
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Deneen Hesser
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Larry Junck
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Ronald Lawson
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Paul L Moots
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Herbert B Newton
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Jeffrey J Raizer
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Lawrence Recht
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Nicole Shonka
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Allen K Sills
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Lode J Swinnen
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - David Tran
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Nam Tran
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Frank D Vrionis
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Patrick Yung Wen
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Nicole R McMillian
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Maria Ho
- From University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Duke Cancer Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; American Brain Tumor Association; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Moffitt Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Filipce V, Ammirati M. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the working area obtained by endoscope and microscope in pterional and orbitozigomatic approach to the basilar artery bifurcation using computed tomography based frameless stereotaxy: A cadaver study. Asian J Neurosurg 2015; 10:69-74. [PMID: 25972933 PMCID: PMC4421971 DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.145064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Basilar aneurisms are one of the most complex and challenging pathologies for neurosurgeons to treat. Endoscopy is a recently rediscovered neurosurgical technique that could lend itself well to overcome some of the vascular visualization challenges associated with this pathology. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the basilar artery (BA) bifurcation (tip of the basilar) working area afforded by the microscope and the endoscope using different approaches and image guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a total of 9 dissections, including pterional (PT) and orbitozygomatic (OZ) approaches bilaterally in five whole, fresh cadaver heads. We used computed tomography based image guidance for intraoperative navigation as well as for quantitative measurements. We estimated the working area of the tip of the basilar, using both a rigid endoscope and an operating microscope. Operability was qualitatively assessed by the senior authors. RESULTS In microscopic exposure, the OZ approach provided greater working area (160 ± 34.3 mm(2)) compared to the PT approach (129.8 ± 37.6 mm(2)) (P > 0.05). The working area in both PT and OZ approaches using 0° and 30° endoscopes was larger than the one available using the microscope alone (P < 0.05). In the PT approach, both 0° and 30° endoscopes provided a working area greater than a microscopic OZ approach (P < 0.05) and an area comparable to the OZ endoscopic approach (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Integration of endoscope and microscope in both PT and OZ approaches can provide significantly greater surgical exposure of the BA bifurcation compared to that afforded by the conventional approaches alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venko Filipce
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Colasanti R, Tailor ARA, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Image-guided, microsurgical topographic anatomy of the endolymphatic sac and vestibular aqueduct via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. Neurosurg Rev 2015; 38:715-21. [DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0634-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
34
|
Ammirati M, Ma J, Cheatham M, Bloch J, Becker DP. A Microneurosurgical Anatomical Study of Drilling of the Posterior Wall of the Petrous Pyramid1. Skull Base Surg 2015. [DOI: 10.1159/000429960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
35
|
Ammirati M, Ma J, Becker DP, Black KL, Cheatham M, Bloch J. Transzygomatic Approach to the Tentorial Incisura: Surgical Anatomy1. Skull Base Surg 2015. [DOI: 10.1159/000429967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
36
|
Colasanti R, Tailor ARA, Lamki T, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Maximizing the Petroclival Region Exposure Via a Suboccipital Retrosigmoid Approach: Where Is the Intrapetrous Internal Carotid Artery? Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2015; 11 Suppl 2:329-36; discussion 336-7. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUNDRecent reports have validated the use of retrosigmoid approach extensions to deal with petroclival lesions.OBJECTIVETo describe the topographic retrosigmoid anatomy of the intrapetrous internal carotid artery (IICA), providing guidelines for maximizing the petroclival region exposure via this route.METHODSThe IICA was exposed bilaterally in 6 specimens via a retrosigmoid approach in the semisitting position. Its topographic relationship with pertinent posterolateral cranial base landmarks was quantified with neuronavigation.RESULTSSafe exposure of the IICA and the surrounding inframeatal/petroclival regions was accomplished in all specimens. On average, the IICA genu was 15.08 mm anterolateral to the XI nerve in the jugular foramen, 16.18 mm anteroinferolateral to the endolymphatic sac, and 10.63 mm anteroinferolateral to the internal acoustic meatus. On average, the IICA horizontal segment was 9.92 mm inferolateral to the Meckel cave, and its midpoint was 19.96 mm anterolateral to the XI nerve in the jugular foramen. The mean distance from the IICA genu to the cochlea was 1.96 mm. The genu and the midpoint of the horizontal segment of the IICA were exposed at a depth of approximately 14.50 mm from the posterior pyramidal wall with the use of different drilling angles (49.74° vs 39.54°, respectively).CONCLUSIONKnowledge of the IICA general relationship with these landmarks (combined with a careful assessment of the preoperative imaging and with the use of intraoperative navigation and micro-Doppler) may help to enhance the inframeatal/petroclival region exposure via a retrosigmoid route, maximizing safe inframeatal and suprameatal petrous bone removal while minimizing neurovascular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Colasanti
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Al-Rahim A Tailor
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Tariq Lamki
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Umberto I General Hospital, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tailor AR, Buohliquah L, Ammirati M, Carrau R, Lamki T, Lubow M. Cranial-Base Surgery for Drug Delivery via Mastoid Cavity: A Novel Procedure for Vestibular/Auditory Syndromes. Skull Base Surg 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
38
|
Ammirati M, Lamki T, Chitnis G, Yang X, Russell D, Coble D, Kaur B, Knopp M, Moore S, Ziaie B. In vivobrain electrophoresis – a novel method for chemotherapy of CNS diseases. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2015; 12:727-34. [DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2015.1014034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
39
|
Colasanti R, Tailor ARA, Gorjian M, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Microsurgical and Endoscopic Anatomy of the Extended Retrosigmoid Inframeatal Infratemporal Approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2015; 11 Suppl 2:181-9; discussion 189. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUNDDifferent and often complex routes are available to deal with jugular foramen tumors with extracranial extension.OBJECTIVETo describe a novel extension of the retrosigmoid approach useful to expose the extracranial area abutting the posterior fossa skull base.METHODSA navigation-guided, endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid inframeatal approach was performed on 6 cadaveric heads in the semisitting position, displaying an area from the internal acoustic meatus to the lower cranial nerves and exposing the intrapetrous internal carotid artery. We then continued removing the temporal bone located between the sigmoid sinus and the hearing apparatus, reaching the infratemporal area just lateral to the jugular fossa. This drilling, which we refer to as posterolateral inframeatal drilling, has not previously been described. Drilling of the horizontal segment of the occipital squama allowed good visualization of the uppermost cervical internal carotid artery, internal jugular vein, and lower extracranial cranial nerves.RESULTSWe were able to provide excellent exposure of the inframeatal area and of the posterior infratemporal fossa from different operative angles, preserving the neurovascular structures and the labyrinth in all specimens. The intradural operative window on the extracranial compartment was limited by the venous sinuses and the hearing apparatus and presented a mean width of 8.52 mm. Sigmoid sinus transection led to better visualization of the lateral half of the jugular foramen and of the uppermost cervical internal carotid artery.CONCLUSIONThe navigation-guided endoscope-assisted extended retrosigmoid inframeatal infratemporal approach provides an efficient and versatile route for resection of jugular foramen tumors with extracranial extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Colasanti
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Neurosurgery, Umberto I General Hospital, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Al-Rahim A Tailor
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mehrnoush Gorjian
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Colasanti R, Lamki T, Tailor ARA, Ammirati M. Recurrent atlantoaxial synovial cyst resection via a navigation-guided, endoscope-assisted posterior approach. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 5:S567-9. [PMID: 25593779 PMCID: PMC4287902 DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.148048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Atlantoaxial cysts are rare, and only 46 histologically confirmed cases have been reported. Case Description: A 75-year-old male presented 2 years ago with headache, neck pain, loss of balance, and episodic dysphagia, for which he had undergone posterior cervical drainage of a left-sided atlantoaxial cyst. Although his original symptoms resolved, they recurred 2 years later and were correlated with an enhanced MR that showed a recurrent left C1-C2 synovial cyst causing marked cervical cord compression. It was successfully resected through a navigation-guided, endoscope-assisted posterior approach. The patient's symptoms/signs resolved completely, and he has remained symptom-free for over 30 months postoperatively, with no evidence of recurrence on MR or craniocervical instability. Conclusions: A patient who successfully underwent resection of a recurrent synovial cervical cyst using a navigation-guided, endoscope-assisted posterior approach has been reported here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Colasanti
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA ; Department of Neurosurgery, Umberto I General Hospital, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Tariq Lamki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Al-Rahim A Tailor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lu L, Gupta N, Hessler J, Liu A, Weldon M, McGregor J, Ammirati M, Guiou M, Xia F, Grecula J. SU-E-T-536: Inhomogeneity Correction in Planning of Gamma Knife Treatments for Acoustic Schwannoma. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4888870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
42
|
Chotai S, Kshettry VR, Ammirati M. Endoscopic-assisted microsurgical techniques at the craniovertebral junction: 4 illustrative cases and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 121:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2013] [Revised: 02/24/2014] [Accepted: 03/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
43
|
Kshettry VR, Jiang X, Chotai S, Ammirati M. Optic nerve surface temperature during intradural anterior clinoidectomy: a comparison between high-speed diamond burr and ultrasonic bone curette. Neurosurg Rev 2014; 37:453-8; discussion 458-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s10143-014-0547-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 01/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
44
|
Chotai S, Kshettry VR, Lamki T, Ammirati M. Surgical outcomes using wide suboccipital decompression for adult Chiari I malformation with and without syringomyelia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 120:129-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 02/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
45
|
Kshettry VR, Chotai S, Chen W, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Quantitative analysis of the effect of brainstem shift on surgical approaches to anterolateral tumors at the craniovertebral junction. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21:644-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 08/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
46
|
Nabors LB, Ammirati M, Bierman PJ, Brem H, Butowski N, Chamberlain MC, DeAngelis LM, Fenstermaker RA, Friedman A, Gilbert MR, Hesser D, Holdhoff M, Junck L, Lawson R, Loeffler JS, Maor MH, Moots PL, Morrison T, Mrugala MM, Newton HB, Portnow J, Raizer JJ, Recht L, Shrieve DC, Sills AK, Tran D, Tran N, Vrionis FD, Wen PY, McMillian N, Ho M. Central nervous system cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014; 11:1114-51. [PMID: 24029126 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Primary and metastatic tumors of the central nervous system are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with varied outcomes and management strategies. Recently, improved survival observed in 2 randomized clinical trials established combined chemotherapy and radiation as the new standard for treating patients with pure or mixed anaplastic oligodendroglioma harboring the 1p/19q codeletion. For metastatic disease, increasing evidence supports the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in treating patients with multiple metastatic lesions but low overall tumor volume. These guidelines provide recommendations on the diagnosis and management of this group of diseases based on clinical evidence and panel consensus. This version includes expert advice on the management of low-grade infiltrative astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, anaplastic gliomas, glioblastomas, medulloblastomas, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and brain metastases. The full online version, available at NCCN. org, contains recommendations on additional subtypes.
Collapse
|
47
|
Shaw AB, Marlin ES, Ikeda DS, Ammirati M. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection following uterine instrumentation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21:1462-3. [PMID: 24656752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/05/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Shunt infections are most common within the first 6 months following implantation. A shunt infection 19 years after implantation secondary to uterine ablation has not been reported to our knowledge. Office hysteroscopic procedures have become commonplace in gynecologic practice. Infectious complication rates are low, but peritonitis has been described. We present a patient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection following a uterine ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Three days following the ablation she developed abdominal pain. CT scan of the abdomen 5 months after the procedure revealed a pseudocyst. She then underwent removal of her shunt with intra-operative cultures revealing Streptococcus agalactiae. Definitive treatment consisted of shunt explantation and antibiotic treatment with complete resolution of her pain and pseudocyst. Consideration for prophylactic antibiotics should be made when a patient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt undergoes any transvaginal procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Shaw
- Wexner Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Avenue, 1014 N Doan Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Evan S Marlin
- Wexner Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Avenue, 1014 N Doan Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Daniel S Ikeda
- Wexner Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Avenue, 1014 N Doan Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Wexner Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Avenue, 1014 N Doan Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ammirati M, Kshettry VR, Lamki T, Wei L, Grecula JC. A Prospective Phase II Trial of Fractionated Stereotactic Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy With or Without Surgery in the Treatment of Patients With 1 to 3 Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2014; 74:586-94; discussion 594. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Several studies have demonstrated that omitting the routine use of adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases may be a reasonable first-line strategy. Retrospective evidence suggests that fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) may have a lower level of toxicity with equivalent efficacy in comparison with radiosurgery.
OBJECTIVE:
To study the phase II efficacy of using a focally directed treatment strategy for symptomatic brain metastases by the use of fSRT with or without surgery and omitting the routine use of adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy.
METHODS:
We used a Fleming single-stage design of 40 patients. Patients were eligible if they presented with 1 to 3 newly diagnosed symptomatic brain metastases, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) greater than 60, and histological confirmation of primary disease. Patients underwent fSRT with the use of a dose of 30 Gy in 5 intensity-modulated fractions as primary or adjuvant treatment after surgical resection. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who experienced neurological death. Secondary end points were overall survival, time to KPS <70, and progression-free survival.
RESULTS:
Of 40 patients accrued, 39 were eligible for analysis. The proportion of patients dying of neurological causes was 13% (5 patients), which includes 3 patients with an unknown cause of death. Median overall survival, time to KPS <70, and progression-free survival were 16 (95% confidence interval, 9-23), 14 (95% confidence interval, 7-20), and 11 (95% confidence interval, 4-21) months, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
A focally directed treatment strategy using fSRT with or without surgery appears to be an effective initial strategy. Based on the results of this phase II clinical trial, further study is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Varun R. Kshettry
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tariq Lamki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lai Wei
- Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - John C. Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kshettry V, Chotai S, Chen W, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Brainstem Shift on Surgical Approaches to Anterolateral Tumors at the Craniovertebral Junction. Skull Base Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1370521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
50
|
Kshettry V, Jiang X, Chotai S, Ammirati M. Optic Nerve Surface Temperature during Intradural Anterior Clinoidectomy: A Comparison Between High-Speed Diamond Burr and Ultrasonic Bone Curette. Skull Base Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1370484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|