Meta-analysis of intravenous dipyridamole-thallium-201 imaging (1985 to 1994) and dobutamine echocardiography (1991 to 1994) for risk stratification before vascular surgery

[Stress echocardiography in the pre-operative evaluation of patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Are results comparable with dypiridamole versus dobutamine stress echo?]

INTRODUCTION

[corrected] Perioperative cardiovascular complications are an important cause of post-surgical morbility and mortality in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Dobutamine Stress Echo is considered one of the methods of choice in the detection of coronary artery disease in this subgroup of patients.

OBJECTIVES

. Our aim was to analyze if dipyridamole stress echocardiography could be used as an alternative to Dobutamine Stress Echo in the perioperative evaluation of patients in need of major vascular surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The result of consecutives dypiridamole and dobutamine stress exams prior to vascular surgery were reviewed. We analyzed if those patients with a positive stress echo presented a higher number of cardiac events during and after surgery than those with negative stress echo. The negative and positive predictive values were calculated for both techniques.

RESULTS

133 stress exams were analysed: 39 with dobutamine and 94 with dipyridamole. Of the 39 dobutamine studies 2 were positive, 29 negatives and 8 non conclusive. Of the 94 dypiridamole studies 13 were positive and 81 negatives. None of the patients with a positive dobutamine echo underwent surgery. The negative predictive value for dobutamine echo was 96.5%, quite similar to that of dypiridamole stress echo (97.5%).

CONCLUSION

Dipyridamole stress echocardiography is a valid alternative to dobutamine echocardiography in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

The role of myocardial perfusion scanning, heart rate variability and D-dimers in predicting the risk of perioperative cardiac complications after peripheral vascular surgery

OBJECTIVES

To study the value of a number of proposed prognostic factors in prediction of the risk of perioperative cardiac events after vascular surgery.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Two hundred and ninety-seven patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery were prospectively studied. Patients underwent preoperative 24 h ambulatory electrocardiography, measurement of haemostatic variables, myocardial assessment of perfusion by dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy and radionuclide ventriculography. The primary endpoint was cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction within 30 days of surgery. A combined endpoint included the primary endpoint plus occurrence of cardiac failure, unstable angina or serious arrhythmias.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (7%), and the combined endpoint in 41 (14%) of patients. On multivariate analysis, increased age, previous myocardial infarction, aortic surgery, impaired heart rate variability and a positive thallium scan were independent predictors of primary end-points. Preoperative atrial fibrillation and increased fibrin D-dimer were additional predictors of the combined endpoint. Construction of receiver-operator characteristic curves to examine the incremental value of predictive models showed that sensitivity and specificity of clinical data alone for primary endpoints was 71% and 72% respectively, while for the full model (incorporating heart rate variability and thallium data) this rose to 84% and 80% (p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary screening using clinical data has limited value in risk assessment prior to vascular surgery but preoperative heart rate variability, D-dimers and thallium scanning provide modest incremental predictive value.

Outcomes of noncardiac surgery after coronary bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown that coronary artery bypass surgery reduces the risk of cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery. Whether coronary angioplasty provides equivalent protection is not known.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo cardiac artery bypass surgery or angioplasty as part of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation trial. All subsequent noncardiac surgeries during a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 7.7 years were recorded among participants in the ancillary Study of Economics and Quality of Life. Rates of mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction, length of stay, and hospital costs were compared by the original randomized assignment.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients had noncardiac surgery at a median of 29 months after their most recent coronary revascularization procedure. Mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction within 30 days of the first noncardiac surgery occurred in 4 of the 250 of the surgery-assigned patients and in 4 of the 251 of the angioplasty-assigned patients (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences in the mean length of hospital stay (6.3 +/- 6.7 versus 6.2 +/- 6.8 days; P = 0.47) or hospital cost ($8,920 +/- $11,511 versus $7,785 +/- $7,643; P = 0.33) between the surgery and angioplasty groups. Similar results were obtained when subsequent noncardiac procedures were included in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

Rates of myocardial infarction and death after noncardiac surgery are similarly low after contemporary bypass surgery or angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Relationship of unrecognised myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus and type of surgery to postoperative cardiac outcomes in vascular surgery

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate preoperative clinical, surgical and instrumental variables as predictors of postoperative cardiac events in patients undergoing different types of elective major vascular surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

on the basis of an algorithm including clinical and test echocardiographic data, we prospectively stratified 604 consecutive patients into low, intermediate and high-risk groups. The value of the variables in predicting postoperative cardiac events was assessed by means of multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

there were 16 major postoperative cardiac events and six of 16 postoperative deaths were cardiac related (1%). Significant predictors of cardiac complications were unrecognised myocardial infarction (odds ratio - (OR) 5.6), coronary artery disease (OR 2.5), severe hypertension (OR 2.1) and peripheral vascular surgery (OR 1.9). In the intermediate-risk group, the best correlates with cardiac complications were unrecognised myocardial infarction (OR 3.3) and diabetes (OR 2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

our results suggest the importance of identifying patients with unrecognised ischaemic heart disease and of using aggressive perioperative protocols for managing diabetic patients undergoing peripheral vascular procedures.

Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus stress echocardiography: prognostic comparisons

The use of noninvasive stress cardiac imaging for stratifying risk in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease is growing as a tool for identification of the subgroup most likely to benefit from the expense and risk of more invasive procedures, including cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization. In this setting, it is especially important that a test be able to identify patients with sufficiently low risk that clinicians are comfortable in deferring such interventions, especially in those with other markers of increased risk. Previous data have shown that cardiac risk is most closely related to the presence and extent of jeopardized viable myocardium on noninvasive stress cardiac imaging. Although stress echocardiography may have comparable ability to detect coronary artery disease, current data suggest that stress echocardiography detects significantly less jeopardized viable myocardium than stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and consequently fewer patients at risk for cardiac events. Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging may therefore have important advantages for risk stratification and the direction of future care of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Imaging techniques to predict cardiovascular risk

Conventional cardiovascular imaging, with a focus on identifying flow-limiting stenoses, does not directly image the atherosclerotic lesion. Recent clinical and pathobiologic data indicate that stenosis severity does not dictate cardiovascular risk and that there are functional, structural, and biologic features of atherosclerosis that are associated with cardiovascular events. Imaging technologies, such as ultrasound, light, x-ray, magnetic resonance, and targeted contrast agents, have been developed to characterize directly the atherosclerotic vessel wall. They provide promising approaches to predict cardiovascular risk and facilitate further study of the mechanisms of atherosclerosis progression and its response to therapy.

Noninvasive strategies for the estimation of cardiac risk in stable chest pain patients. The Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group

Effective allocation of medical resources in stable chest pain patients requires the accurate diagnosis of coronary artery disease and the stratification of future cardiac risk. We studied the relative predictive value for cardiac death of 3 commonly applied noninvasive strategies, clinical assessment, stress electrocardiography, and myocardial perfusion tomography, in a large, multicenter population of stable angina patients. The multicenter observational series comprised 7 community and academic medical centers and 8,411 stable chest pain patients. All patients underwent pretest clinical screening followed by stress (exercise 84% or pharmacologic 16%) electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion tomography. Risk-adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed to predict cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier rates of time to cardiac catheterization were also computed. Cardiac mortality was 3% during the 2.5 +/- 1.5 years of follow-up. The number of infarcted vascular territories and pretest clinical risk factors were strong predictors of cardiac mortality, whereas the number of ischemic vascular territories gained increasing importance when determining post-test resource use requirements (i.e., the decision to perform cardiac catheterization). Exertional ST-segment depression in a population with a high frequency of electrocardiographic abnormalities at rest was not a significant differentiator of cardiac death risk. Stable chest pain patients are accurately identified as being at high risk for near-term cardiac events by both physicians' screening clinical evaluation and by the results of stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Disease management strategies for stable chest pain patients aimed at risk reduction should incorporate knowledge of relevant end points in treatment and guideline development.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of stress echocardiography in stable patients

Stress echocardiography is an effective diagnostic and prognostic technique in stable patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction, or chronic left ventricular dysfunction and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events regardless of the clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Stress echocardiography provides incremental prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable to that from radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for one-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Assessment of cardiac risk before nonvascular surgery: dobutamine stress echocardiography in 530 patients

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the incremental value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for assessment of cardiac risk before nonvascular surgery.

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists regarding the preoperative assessment of cardiac risk in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who are to undergo nonvascular surgery.

METHODS

All patients (303 men, 227 women) who underwent DSE before nonvascular surgery and did not sustain an intervening event (coronary revascularization or cardiac event) were studied. Clinical, electrocardiographic and rest and stress echocardiographic variables were evaluated to identify predictors of postoperative cardiac events.

RESULTS

Events occurred in 6% of patients: 1 cardiac death and 31 nonfatal myocardial infarctions. All of these patients had inducible ischemia on DSE (sensitivity 100%, specificity 63%). Multivariate predictors of postoperative events in patients with ischemia were history of congestive heart failure (p = 0.006; odds ratio = 4.66; confidence interval 1.55 to 14.02) and ischemic threshold less than 60% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (p = 0.0001; odds ratio 7.002; confidence interval 2.79 to 17.61). Clinical variables of Eagle's index identified 21% of patients as low, 68% as intermediate and 11% as high risk preoperatively; the postoperative event rates were 3%, 6%, and 14%, respectively. Dobutamine stress echocardiography identified 60% of patients as low (no ischemia), 32% as intermediate (ischemic threshold 60% or more) and 8% as high risk (ischemic threshold < 60%); postoperative event rates were 0%, 9% and 43%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease evaluated before nonvascular surgery, DSE had incremental value over clinical, electrocardiographic and rest echocardiographic variables for identifying patients at low, intermediate and high risk for postoperative cardiac events. Ischemia occurring at less than 60% of age-predicted maximal heart rate identified patients at highest risk.

Usefulness of hypotension during dobutamine echocardiography in predicting perioperative cardiac events

This study was undertaken to determine the prognostic significance of hypotension induced during preoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) before vascular and noncardiac thoracic surgery. Wall motion abnormality during DSE predicts perioperative risk. Although hypotension during DSE has not been shown to correlate with the presence or severity of coronary artery disease, its significance in perioperative risk assessment is unknown. We retrospectively studied 300 patients who had DSE within 6 months of noncardiac surgery. Perioperative events including death, myocardial infarction, ischemia, and arrhythmias were recorded. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to examine the association between clinical and echocardiographic variables and perioperative events. A hypotensive response during DSE was seen in 85 patients (28%). Forty-eight patients (16%) had 54 perioperative complications including 4 cardiac-related deaths, 10 myocardial infarctions, 12 myocardial ischemic events, and 28 arrhythmias. Hypotension during DSE was predictive of the combined end point of perioperative cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemia (odds ratio 4.04, 95% confidence interval 1.72 to 9.51). In a multivariate logistic regression model, hypotension during DSE remained a significant predictor (odds ratio 4.10, p<0.01). DSE-related hypotension was predictive of perioperative cardiac events and therefore may have a role in risk stratification before vascular or noncardiac thoracic surgery.

Screening for coronary artery disease

Unidentified coronary artery disease remains a significant cause of premature death and morbidity during the prime of life. The availability of effective interventions for the management of ischemia has provoked new interest in screening for this condition in asymptomatic patients, in the hope of reducing the burden of this condition. Although widespread use of stress testing is ineffective, the use of imaging techniques may offer better accuracy for detection of ischemia. Other tests that identify evidence of atheroma in the peripheral or coronary circulation may be useful to identify patients at risk.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Use of Stress Echocardiography and Radionuclide Scintigraphy

Stress echocardiography and radionuclide scintigraphy are effective diagnostic and prognostic techniques in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), chronic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Both are sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events irrespective of clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Both provide incremental diagnostic and prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable with radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for single-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction surgery has been proposed as a bridge to lung transplantation and as definitive therapy for advanced chronic obstructive lung disease. However, patient selection criteria and optimal preoperative assessment have not been clearly defined.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the feasibility, safety, and value of dobutamine stress echocardiography as a predictor of major early cardiac events in patients who underwent lung volume reduction surgery.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 46 patients (21 men and 25 women, mean age 59 +/- 9 years) who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (maximum dose 40 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) plus atropine if needed) 180 days or less before lung volume reduction surgery. Adverse cardiac events were prospectively defined and tabulated during hospitalization after the operation and at subsequent outpatient visits.

RESULTS

Dobutamine stress echocardiography was interpretable in 45 of 46 (98%) patients. There were no adverse events during testing. The studies revealed normal left ventricular systolic function at rest in all patients and normal right ventricular function in all patients but one. Thirteen patients had right ventricular enlargement. Estimated right ventricular systolic pressure was mildly elevated (>40 mm Hg) in 5 patients. Four patients (9%) had stress tests positive for ischemia. There were no perioperative deaths. Follow-up was available for 44 of 45 patients at a duration of 20.0 +/- 7.0 months. Two major adverse cardiac events occurred in the same patient in whom the results of dobutamine stress echocardiography were positive for ischemia (positive predictive value 25%, 95% confidence interval 0% to 83%; negative predictive value 100%, 95% confidence interval 90 to 100%).

CONCLUSION

Despite end-stage chronic obstructive lung disease and poor ultrasound windows, dobutamine stress echocardiography is feasible and safe in patients undergoing evaluation for lung volume reduction surgery. It yields important information on right and left ventricular function and has an excellent negative predictive value for early and late adverse cardiac events.

Cost-effectiveness of stress-echocardiography

Because of constraints on the costs of providing medical care, cardiologists in the future will find themselves challenged to provide care for their patients in the most cost-effective manner possible. Although stress-echocardiography has been shown to compare favorably with other tests in diagnostic accuracy, data on cost-effectiveness are scarce. In this article, general concepts of cost-effectiveness as they relate to stress-echocardiography are reviewed and the available literature is summarized. Although definitive data are lacking, there is evidence to suggest that stress-echocardiography may prove to be cost-effective in several clinical situations.

Recognition and management of preoperative risk

Internists are frequently asked to do preoperative consultations and to manage perioperative complications. Realistic goals are to identify patient factors that increase the risk of surgery, to quantify this risk in order to make decisions about the appropriateness of and timing of the surgery, to provide recommendations on how to minimize the risk, to identify and manage coexisting medical conditions and their associated medication requirements, to monitor the patient for perioperative problems, and to make recommendations to deal with these problems when they occur. With few exceptions, nonselective imaging and laboratory screening tests have repeatedly been shown to be of little value when the history and physical do not suggest a problem. The risk associated with the planned surgery can be estimated, with the most common serious complications being cardiac events. Updated versions of Goldman's risk indices are particularly helpful for this. Clinical variables are optimally combined with selective stress testing to discern which patients will benefit from preoperative revascularization. This has been studied best in the setting of vascular surgery. A critical guiding principle is that the value of revascularization must be judged in terms of long term gains rather than just immediate perioperative benefit. Other interventions include the selective use of beta blockers, adequate analgesia for all, control of hypertension, and appropriate volume management, especially in the settings of preexisting CHF or valvular disease. It must also be recognized that perioperative ischemia and CHF often present atypically. An approach that combines aspects of both the ACC/AHA and the ACP guidelines seems optimal. A variety of noncardiac issues must also be addressed. Postoperative pulmonary complications are common, especially with preexisting pulmonary disease, thoracic and upper abdominal surgery, and obesity. PFTs and ABGs are indicated in selected patients. Stopping smoking, incentive spirometry, and selective use of bronchodilators and antibiotics are helpful. Patients with rheumatologic diseases have specific concerns based on systemic manifestations of disease including anemia, thrombocytopenia, pulmonary fibrosis, pericarditis, and hypercoagulability; medication effects particularly from steroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and specific joint problems including contractures and atlantoaxial joint instability. Diabetes increases the risk of infection and cardiac complications. Prevention of ketoacidosis and glucose control are necessary and can be achieved through a variety of approaches, depending on whether the patient suffers from Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes. The threshold for transfusion has increased in recent years, as has the use of erythropoietin and autologous blood donation. There is no longer an absolute hemoglobin that requires transfusion, although most require transfusion for hemoglobins less than 8 mg/dL, especially in the setting of cardiac disease and bloody surgery. The elderly require surgery at an increased rate and often do not do as well as younger patients. The primary issues are, however, not their age but their increased frequency of underlying disease and diminished reserve. The latter makes them prone to postoperative delirium, sensitivity to medications, and cardiac and pulmonary problems. Despite the many diseases that patients often have and the stresses of surgery itself, modern anesthetic and surgical techniques allow almost all patients to undergo necessary procedures at acceptable risk. The internist plays a critical role in minimizing this risk even further.

Pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Dobutamine and arbutamine stress testing

Pharmacologic stress testing is an important noninvasive method for evaluating patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who are unable to adequately exercise. Pharmacologic stress echocardiography using dobutamine has been developed over the last 10 to 15 years as an alternative to vasodilator stress testing using nuclear perfusion imaging. As experience has grown, digital subtraction echocardiogram has been shown to be a safe, convenient, and reliable method for stress testing in a variety of patient populations. Digital subtraction echocardiogram has comparable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy when compared to other stress testing methods which employ cardiac imaging and is superior to the exercise echocardiogram. It has certain advantages over nuclear perfusion imaging in terms of cost and convenience. The recent addition of arbutamine echocardiography (which has been shown to be comparable to digital subtraction echocardiogram) provides another alternative method for pharmacologic stress testing. Continued improvement in echocardiographic image quality and the development of new technologies such as tissue harmonic imaging and contrast echocardiography will hopefully improve the echocardiographic evaluation of wall motion therefore increasing the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic stress testing.

Exercise echocardiography. Principles, methods, and clinical use

Stress echocardiography is composed of a family of examinations in which various forms of cardiovascular stress are combined with echocardiographic imaging to assist in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Exercise cardiography has evolved over the past 20 years into a routinely available clinical tool employed in both university and community hospital settings. This article discusses advantages and disadvantages of using exercise echocardiography.

Technetium Tc 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging: current role for evaluation of prognosis

Like 201Tl imaging, technetium Tc 99m sestamibi (MIBI) myocardial imaging can be used with exercise and pharmacologic testing to assess the presence of coronary artery disease. An increasing body of literature indicates that MIBI can also be used to assess risk of future cardiac events such as myocardial infarction or death. This article summarizes the current status of MIBI imaging for evaluating prognosis in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Prognosis of patients with vascular disease after clinical evaluation and dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Coronary disease is an important cause of long-term morbidity in patients needing major vascular surgery. We sought to assess the efficacy of preoperative clinical evaluation and the detection of inducible ischemia for prediction of immediate and long-term cardiac outcomes of patients undergoing vascular surgery.

METHODS

In 233 patients undergoing vascular procedures, we assessed risk clinically on the basis of Eagle's criteria. Dobutamine echocardiography was performed with a standard protocol and results were classified as showing ischemia, scar, or a normal response. Patients were observed perioperatively, and late follow-up (28 +/- 13 months) was completed in all surgical survivors. A composite end point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and unstable and progressive angina requiring late revascularization was used to judge event-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 233 patients undergoing preoperative dobutamine echocardiography, 39 (17%) had inducible ischemia and 36 (15%) had scar. Perioperative events occurred in 8 patients (3%). None of the patients with ischemia had perioperative events, reflecting the effect of revascularization in 9 patients. Late events occurred in 36 patients; ischemia on preoperative stress testing was a predictor of these events even after adjusting for clinical variables and left ventricular dysfunction (relative risk = 3.3; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 6.8; P =.001). The association of ischemia with clinical predictors was associated with incrementally worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

In addition to perioperative assessment, the combined use of clinical and dobutamine echocardiographic evaluation may stratify the risk of late cardiac events.

Perioperative Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Adverse cardiac events during noncardiac surgery are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. As the population ages, greater numbers of patients (including the elderly) are undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures; additional emphasis must therefore be placed on effective preoperative risk assessment. On a national level, the estimated annual expenditure for this process is already $3.7 billion. There is a need for both the specialist and primary care provider to execute a safe, methodical, and cost efficient screening plan. This process should identify both the patients at highest risk and also those at lowest risk. Subsequently, the emphasis should attempt to minimize the overall risk of perioperative complications. The cornerstone of risk assessment requires meticulous history taking, a thorough physical examination, and usually a chest radiograph and an ECG. Five subsequent (basic) steps for the evaluation of patients for noncardiac surgery are outlined here in assessment of clinical markers and the pa- tient's functional capacity, risk of the surgical procedure, the need for noninvasive testing, and when appropriate, the indications for invasive testing. The AHA/ACC Practice Guidelines Committee has outlined a clinical algorithm which provides a stepwise approach to guide the clinician during the decision making process. The purpose of preoperative evaluation is not to "give medical clearance" per se, but rather to evaluate the patient's current medical status, detect stress-induced ischemia in a cost effective manner, and to make recommendations about patient management throughout the entire perioperative period.

Preoperative assessment of cardiac risk in noncardiac major vascular surgery

We evaluated whether a preoperative clinical algorithm allows an adequate stratification in cardiac risk and the predictive value of dipyridamole thallium-201 scintigraphy and rest echocardiography for postoperative adverse cardiac outcomes. Three hundred twenty patients undergoing 338 vascular surgery procedures were prospectively stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk. The low- and intermediate-risk patients underwent surgery without further diagnostic evaluation. In 7 high-risk patients the vascular procedure was canceled (1 died of myocardial infarction at 6-month follow-up), 9 underwent presurgical myocardial revascularization (1 died of myocardial infarction), and 49 underwent vascular surgery with perioperative intensive care treatment. Hospital mortality was 3.8%. Cardiac mortality and morbidity were 1.5% and 10.4%, respectively. We observed a significant difference in "hard" (death, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, major arrhythmias) and "soft" (myocardial ischemia, minor arrhythmias) events between groups, p <0.001. Previous pulmonary edema was a predictive variable of cardiac outcomes (multiple logistic regression analysis). Ninety-nine of 220 intermediate-risk patients randomly underwent dipyridamole thallium-201 scintigraphy: 37 had redistribution, 10 persistent, and 52 no defects; 7 of 13 soft and hard cardiac events occurred in patients without redistribution defects. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of redistribution defects for postoperative adverse outcomes were 38%, 63%, 14%, 87%, respectively. This algorithm may provide a safe and cost-effective approach (average cost saving per patient $1,500) to cardiac risk stratification. These results suggest that routine use of dipyridamole thallium-201 scintigraphy for screening of intermediate-risk patients may not be warranted.

Comparison of dipyridamole stress echocardiography and perfusion scintigraphy for cardiac risk stratification in vascular surgery patients

Dipyridamole single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has a high negative predictive value for perioperative cardiac events, but events are infrequent in patients with a positive test. In contrast, dipyridamole echocardiography is more selective for detection of multivessel disease and thus may have a greater specificity for cardiac events. We therefore compared the ability of dipyridamole SPECT and echocardiography to predict perioperative and long-term cardiac events in 133 patients referred for vascular surgery. The group was also evaluated based on clinical features and ejection fraction. Four patients had surgery cancelled because of high risk and were excluded from further analysis. Among the 129 remaining patients, 21 had coronary revascularization (n=12) or an early cardiac end point (n=9). The sensitivity of SPECT for the prediction of early events (90%) was not significantly different from that of echocardiography (66%, p=NS). The specificity of SPECT (68%) was less than that of echocardiography (88%, p <0.001%), as was the accuracy (72% vs 84%, p=0.02). These findings were replicated after exclusion of patients with treatment end points. During long-term follow-up, 12 patients experienced > or = 1 event: 6 died from cardiac causes, 4 underwent revascularization, and 3 had myocardial infarction. Thus, the specificity of SPECT and echocardiography for late events were 58% and 80%, respectively (p <0.001). The 3-year survival of patients without ischemia during echocardiography or at SPECT was not different (93% vs 94%, p=NS).

Quality assessment and vascular disease: the analytic imperatives confronting vascular surgeons in the new era

Vascular Surgery is poised at the edge of a rare moment in medical care. Energy, intelligence, innovation, and resources are available to improve greatly the methods of vascular disease correction. Precedent exists for the overzealous application of technologies. Poor study design and inadequate tracking of outcomes can dilute the value, discredit a critical therapy, and undermine proper patient selection. The proper analysis of our new technologies will be obtained only through well-organized studies, information systems, and informed organizational oversight. Our analysis must extend beyond procedure-specific outcomes to include quality of life issues measured in a validated and relevant fashion. The present and future of vascular disease therapeutics must reside under the control of those who have devoted their lives to its theory and practice.

The role of myocardial revascularization preceding noncardiac surgery

Of about 6.7 million Americans who have coronary artery disease, approximately 700,000 undergo various noncardiac operations annually in the United States. Perioperative cardiac complications remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality not related to the primary operative procedure; the mechanisms of perioperative ischemia and infarction are unclear. Currently, clinicians, using a combination of clinical and laboratory findings, can estimate the risk of noncardiac surgical procedures with a high degree of precision, but much less is known about the preferred approach to patient management after noninvasive risk stratification. Coronary angiography and revascularization are frequently recommended for those determined by functional tests to be at moderate and high risk, but the risks of revascularization are often substantially higher among these patients. No randomized, controlled trials exist to guide patient management. Quantitative decision analysis based on published nonrandomized data suggests that coronary angiography with selective myocardial revascularization should be performed to reduce the risk of noncardiac surgery only if the risk of noncardiac surgery is greater than 5% and the risk of coronary angiography with selective revascularization is less than 3%. On the other hand, if independent indications exist for myocardial revascularization, it should generally be performed before the noncardiac operation.

Perioperative cardiac evaluation for noncardiac surgery noninvasive cardiac testing

Prognostic risk stratification to identify perioperative and long-term cardiac risk in selected patients undergoing noncardiac surgery is part of good clinical practice. Exercise variables associated with significant increased risk include poor functional capacity (eg, <4 metabolic equivalents), marked exercise-induced ST segment shift or angina at low workloads, and inability to increase or actually decrease systolic blood pressure with progressive exercise. Approximately 40% of patients tested before peripheral vascular surgery will have an abnormal exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). The predictive value for a perioperative event, ie, death or myocardial infarction, ranges from 5% to 25% for a positive test and 90% to 95% for a negative test. Whereas exercise cardiac imaging is the modality of choice in patients with a noninterpretable exercise ECG, pharmacological stress imaging should be used in the 30% to 50% of patients who require perioperative noninvasive risk stratification and are unable to perform an adequate level of exercise to test cardiac reserve. Myocardial perfusion variables predictive of increased cardiac events include severity of the perfusion defect, number of reversible defects, extent of fixed and reversible defects, increased lung uptake of thallium-201, and marked ST segment changes associated with angina during the test. The reported sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine-induced echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities in patients with peripheral vascular disease is similar to myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, but the confidence limits are wider due to the smaller sample size in these more recent studies. In conclusion, noninvasive cardiac testing should be used selectively in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery; the results provide useful estimates of short- and long-term risk of cardiac events, and the magnitude of abnormal response on noninvasive testing should be used to formulate decisions regarding the need for coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization.

Influence of race on the prediction of cardiac events with stress technetium-99m sestamibi tomographic imaging in patients with stable angina pectoris

The prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in African-Americans is unknown. This study compared the prediction of cardiac events of stress technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in symptomatic Caucasian and African-American patients. Prospectively collected stress Tc-99m sestamibi tomographic imaging data from 4 medical centers, with follow-up information in 1,086 Caucasian and African-American patients, were analyzed in a core statistical laboratory. Primary events of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction and secondary events of all-cause mortality were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards multivariable model. Normal images in both African-Americans and Caucasians were associated with a low-annual cardiac event rate, whereas abnormal images were significantly associated with a higher cardiac event rate. The highest predictor of cardiac events was multivessel abnormality in both races. Use of this technique could identify patients at high risk and potentially reduce the high-cardiac event rate in African-Americans by utilizing appropriate therapies.

Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography

Cardiovascular stress testing remains the mainstay of provocative evaluation for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Stress echocardiography has become a valuable means of cardiovascular stress testing. It plays a crucial role in the initial detection of coronary disease, in determining prognosis, and in therapeutic decision making. The purpose of this document is to outline the recommended methodology for stress echocardiography with respect to personnel and equipment as well as the clinical use of this recently developed technique. Specific limitations will also be discussed.

The utility of dobutamine echocardiography in preoperative evaluation for elective aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative cardiac evaluations have been advocated prior to major vascular procedures to reduce the incidence of postoperative cardiac complications. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and predictive value of routine dobutamine echocardiography (DE) in the screening of patients undergoing elective aortic surgery.

METHODS

Dobutamine echocardiography was performed preoperatively on all patients having elective aortic procedures by our university surgical group from June 1995 to August 1996. The cardiac morbidity and mortality from this group were compared with that of a similar group undergoing elective aortic procedures from June 1993 to May 1995 with no dobutamine echocardiography (NDE).

RESULTS

Although there was no statistically significant difference in either overall mortality (4.4% in NDE vs. 2.3% in DE) or cardiac mortality (2.9% in NDE vs. 0% in DE) between the two groups, cardiac events occurred only in those patients with previous coronary artery disease. In addition, dobutamine echocardiography had a negative predictive value of 97%

CONCLUSIONS

Although routine screening is not necessary, selective screening of patients using dobutamine stress echocardiography is justified because of its high negative predictive value.

Impact of metoprolol on heart rate, blood pressure, and contractility in normal subjects during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiograms were performed in 6 volunteers under basal conditions and after 72 hours of metoprolol, 50 mg twice daily. Although heart rate responses were blunted, contractility increased to levels seen before beta blockade.

Outcomes and cost implications of a clinical-based algorithm to guide the discriminate use of stress imaging before noncardiac surgery

Approximately 8 million patients at risk for coronary artery disease undergo noncardiac surgery annually in the United States. This study defined the appropriateness and cost of evaluating these patients with stress imaging tests. Before noncardiac surgery, 178 consecutive patients were prospectively studied by stress imaging. Pretest cardiac risk (low, intermediate, high) was established by interviewing the referring physician and separately by a cardiologist on the basis of the nature of noncardiac surgery and Eagle's clinical criteria. Patients were followed-up for alterations in management and perioperative events until hospital discharge. Referring physicians and cardiologists identified low risk in 24% and 54% of patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Of 96 patients identified as low risk by cardiologists, 75 had minor surgery and 21 had major surgery, but no clinical risk factors. In the remaining 82 patients with major surgery, ischemia and other severe abnormalities were detected in 19 (23%) patients. At follow-up, no perioperative complications occurred in minor surgery; one patient with major surgery but no clinical risk factors died from complications related to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Patients with at least one clinical risk factor undergoing major surgery but who did not have ischemia on stress testing (n = 63) had two complications (infarction and unstable angina). Intervention (revascularization and surgical cancellation) was probably the explanation for the absence of events in 19 patients with ischemia. With a weighted mean Medicare reimbursement ($386), the use of a simple selection algorithm based on noncardiac surgery and clinical risk to avoid testing low-risk patients would have an average cost of $214 per patient, representing a 45% savings.

[Role of noninvasive examinations in the management of ischemic cardiopathy. V. Noninvasive examinations in the management of patients with chronic ischemic cardiopathy]

In the last few years the has been an enormous development in noninvasive testing in the field of clinical cardiology. In fact, excellent monographs on each one of these techniques have been published elsewhere, but fewer publications exist that treat the topic of their indications and use in an integrated way, except for in the most common clinical situations. In this paper, the treatment of patients who present chest pain, stable and unstable angina is discussed, including the study of postinfarction patients. Furthermore, the role of noninvasive tests in the detection of coronary heart disease in women and in patients with left bundle branch block is thoroughly analyzed; as well as their usefulness after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization and in patients with peripheral vascular disease.