Nephron-sparing Techniques Independently Decrease the Risk of Cardiovascular Events Relative to Radical Nephrectomy in Patients with a T1a–T1b Renal Mass and Normal Preoperative Renal Function

A Comparison of Cryoablation with Heat-Based Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study

PURPOSE

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving cryoablation versus heat-based thermal ablation for clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a large national cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with RCC from 2004 to 2014 who were treated with ablation were identified from the National Cancer Database. OS was estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated by means of log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3,936 patients who received cryoablation and 2,322 who received heat-based thermal ablation met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 67 ± 12 year, and the mean size of tumors was 25 ± 8 mm. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were, respectively, 91%, 82%, and 62% for cryoablation and 89%, 81%, and 55% for heat-based thermal ablation. After propensity score matching, cryoablation was associated with longer OS compared with heat-based thermal ablation (median 11.3 vs 10.4 years; hazard ratio 1.175, 95% CI 1.03-1.341; P = .016). For patients with tumors ≤2 cm, propensity score-matched analyses demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups (P = .772).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, cryoablation may be associated with longer OS compared with heat-based thermal ablation in cT1a RCC. No significant difference in survival rates was observed between the 2 treatments for patients with tumor sizes ≤2 cm. Owing to the inherent limitations of this study, further study with details on technology, local outcome, and complications is needed.

National Norwegian Practice Patterns for Surgical Treatment of Kidney Cancer Tumors ≤7cm: Adherence to Changes in Guidelines May Improve Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on surgical treatment for kidney cancer (KC) have changed over the last 10 yr. We present population-based data for patients with KC tumors ≤7cm from 2008 to 2013 to investigate whether surgical practice in Norway has changed according to guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictors of treatment and survival after KC surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We identified all surgically treated KC patients with tumors ≤7cm without metastasis diagnosed during 2008-2013 (2420 patients) from the Cancer Registry of Norway.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Relationships with outcomes were analyzed using joinpoint regression, multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, Cox regression, relative survival (RS), and competing-risk analyses.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The mean follow-up was 5.2 yr. There was a 28% increase in the number of patients undergoing surgical treatment over the study period. Joinpoint regression revealed a significant annual increase in partial nephrectomy (PN) and a small reduction in radical nephrectomy (RN). PN increased from 43% to 66% for tumors ≤4cm and from 10% to 18% for tumors of 4.1-7cm. Minimally invasive (MI) RN increased from 53% to 72% and MI PN from 25% to 64%, of which 55% of procedures were performed with robotic assistance in 2013. The geographical distribution of treatment approaches differed significantly. Both PN and MI approaches were more frequent in high-volume hospitals. Cox regression analysis revealed that PN, age, and Fuhrman grade and stage were independent predictors of survival. There were no significant differences in cancer-specific survival (p=0.8). The 5-yr RS for T1a disease was higher after PN than after RN.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of PN for tumors ≤7cm increased in the 6-yr study period. MI approaches increased for both RN and PN. This treatment shift coincides with the new guideline recommendations in 2010. The possible better survival for patients undergoing PN compared to RN indicates the importance of following evidence-based guidelines.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The use of partial nephrectomy and minimally invasive surgery for kidney cancer tumors increased in Norway from 2008 to 2013 according to population-based data, coinciding with guideline changes. The study illustrate that adherence to guidelines may improve patient outcomes.

Hypertension and Cardiovascular Morbidity Following Surgery for Kidney Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite better renal function following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) relative to radical nephrectomy (RN), there is no consensus with respect to the long-term sequelae associated with surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of surgery and the temporal pattern of two different cardiovascular event (CVe) categories after NSS versus RN.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We collected data of 898 patients with cT1-2 N0 M0 renal mass and no history of CVe treated with NSS versus RN. CVe categories were dichotomised in (1) de novo hypertension (HT) and (2) other major cardiovascular events (MCEs).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable competing regression analyses (MVAs) tested the adjusted effect of surgery type on each CVe category.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Among patients treated with RN, 38% of HT events occurred immediately after surgery. Conversely, in NSS counterparts, the onset of HT was diluted over the years after surgery (10% of HT events in the first 6 mo). When an MCE was considered, an increasing long-term time-dependent prevalence of the outcome was observed in both groups, with no statistically significantly difference between NSS and RN. At MVA, RN was associated with a higher HT risk (hazard ratio [HR] 2.89; p=0.006) than but a similar MCE risk (HR 0.85; p=0.6) to NSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to RN, NSS showed an independent protective effect on HT but not on MCEs. In patients with no history of preoperative HT or MCEs, the onset of HT after RN is a very early event, due probably to the acute loss of renal parenchyma. This is not the case for the other cardiovascular morbidity, which develops in the long-term period, regardless of the type of surgery performed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In renal cancer patients without a medical history of cardiopathy, preserving healthy kidney tissue at surgery is associated with a decreased risk of developing postoperative hypertension.

Postoperative complications increase the risk of long-term chronic kidney disease after nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cancer and normal preoperative renal function

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether postoperative complications affect long-term functional outcomes of renal patients treated with nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an observational study, enrolling 596 patients with preoperative normal renal function treated with NSS for clinical T1abN0M0 renal masses. Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) including as covariates age, comorbidity (scored according to the Charlson comorbidity index), hypertension, tumour size, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² at discharge, and ischaemia time.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients (23%) developed postoperative complications. At a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 53 (26-91) months, CKD risk was 19% for patients with postoperative complications and 11% for those without complications. Patients experiencing postoperative complications (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.26-2.86) were at increased risk of developing CKD during the follow-up at multivariable analysis, after accounting for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data outline how postoperative complications might have a detrimental impact on postoperative renal function in patients submitted to NSS. Improper patient selection, increasing the risk of postoperative complications, could limit the benefit in terms of renal function brought by NSS.

Tumor Enucleation Is Appropriate During Partial Nephrectomy

Tumor enucleation is oncologically safe and has the potential to meet the essential requirements for conservative surgery: (1) to widen the indications to tumors with unfavorable nephrometry; (2) to be well suited for minimally invasive surgery; and (3) to maximize the volume of parenchyma preserved.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated RCC guideline based on standardised methodology including systematic reviews, which is robust, transparent, reproducible, and reliable.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

For the 2019 update, evidence synthesis was undertaken based on a comprehensive and structured literature assessment for new and relevant data. Where necessary, formal systematic reviews adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were undertaken. Relevant databases (Medline, Cochrane Libraries, trial registries, conference proceedings) were searched until June 2018, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled studies with a comparator arm, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where relevant, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, and qualitative and quantitative syntheses of the evidence were performed. The remaining sections of the document were updated following a structured literature assessment. Clinical practice recommendations were developed and issued based on the modified GRADE framework.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

All chapters of the RCC guidelines were updated based on a structured literature assessment, for prioritised topics based on the availability of robust data. For RCTs, RoB was low across studies. For most non-RCTs, clinical and methodological heterogeneity prevented pooling of data. The majority of included studies were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts, based on single- or multi-institutional data or national registries. The exception was for the treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there were several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2019 RCC guidelines have been updated by the multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2019.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel has thoroughly evaluated the available research data on kidney cancer to establish international standards for the care of kidney cancer patients.

Outcome of kidney function after ischaemic and zero-ischaemic laparoscopic and open nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell cancer

Background

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) remains gold standard for the treatment of localised renal cell cancer (RCC), even in case of a normal contralateral kidney. Compared to radical nephrectomy, kidney failure and cardiovascular events are less frequent with NSS. However, the effects of different surgical approaches and of zero ischaemia on the postoperative reduction in renal function remain controversial.

We aimed to investigate the relative short- and long-term changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after ischaemic or zero-ischaemic open (ONSS) and laparoscopic NSS (LNSS) for RCC, and to analyse prognostic factors for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥3.

Methods

Data of 444 patients (211 LNSS, 233 ONSS), including 57 zero-ischaemic cases, were retrospectively analysed. Multiple regression models were used to predict relative changes in renal function. Natural cubic splines were used to demonstrate the association between ischaemia time (IT) and relative changes in renal function.

Results

IT was identified as significant risk factor for short-term relative changes in eGFR (ß = − 0.27) and development of AKI (OR, 1.02), but no effect was found on long-term relative changes in eGFR. Natural cubic splines revealed that IT had a greater effect on patients with baseline eGFR categories ≥G3 concerning short-term decrease in renal function and development of AKI. Unlike LNSS, ONSS was significantly associated with short-term decrease in renal function (ß = − 13.48) and development of AKI (OR, 3.87). Tumour diameter was associated with long-term decrease in renal function (ß = − 1.76), whereas baseline eGFR was a prognostic factor for both short- (ß = − 0.20) and long-term (ß = − 0.29) relative changes in eGFR and the development of CKD stage ≥3 (OR, 0.89).

Conclusions

IT is a significant risk factor for AKI. The short-term effect of IT is not always linear, and the impact also depends on baseline eGFR. Unlike LNSS, ONSS is associated with the development of AKI. Our findings are helpful for surgical planning, and suggest either the application of a clampless NSS technique or at least the shortest possible IT to reduce the risk of short-time impairment of the renal function, which might prevent AKI, particularly regarding patients with baseline eGFR category ≥G3.

Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for the kidney and adrenals has emerged as the need for preservation of function is paramount in patients with poor functional reserve. As reports increasingly showed that oncological outcomes were equivalent to radical excision, elective OSS became a viable alternative in patients with otherwise normal reserve. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of OSS for adrenal and renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library Central Search were searched for recently published articles up to December 2017. The following keywords were used; "partial adrenalectomy", "adrenal sparing", "partial nephrectomy", "nephron sparing", "kidney/renal cancer".

RESULTS

Partial adrenalectomy became an attractive alternative to total adrenalectomy avoiding adrenal insufficiency. Both minimally invasive surgery and ablative techniques were increasingly reported for adrenal OSS with adequate residual adrenal function and excellent oncological outcome. Radical nephrectomy remained for many years as the gold standard of treatment for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma. As the need to reduce the impact on renal function, more conservative approaches were utilized. Soon, the non-inferiority of nephron-sparing surgery to that of radical excision became evident and elective partial nephrectomy was gaining ground as the standard of care for small renal masses in patients with normal contralateral kidneys.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the current status of OSS in renal and adrenal tumors.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

Achieving tumour control when suspecting sinus fat involvement during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: step-by-step

OBJECTIVES

To report a single expert robotic surgeon's step-by-step surgical technique for achieving local cancer control during robot-assisted PN (RAPN) for T3 tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since January 2010 to December 2016, the institutional RAPN database was queried for patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN performed by a single surgeon for tumours ≤4 mm from the collecting system at preoperative computed tomography (three points on the 'N [Nearness]' R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry-score item) that were pT3a involving sinus fat at final pathology. Baseline characteristics, perioperative and oncological outcomes (particularly positive surgical margins, PSMs), were identified.

RESULTS

Of 1497 masses that underwent RAPN, 512 scored 3 points on the 'N' item of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score assessment. In all, 24 patients had pT3a tumours involving sinus fat at final pathology and represented the analysed cohort. RAPN were performed according to the here described technique. No PSMs were reported. Trifecta achievement was 54.2%. Within a median follow-up of 30 months, two and one patients had recurrence or metastasis, respectively. Two patients died unrelated to renal cancer. Retrospective analysis and limited follow-up represent study limitations.

CONCLUSION

In a selected cohort of patients with renal tumours near the sinus fat at baseline R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score assessment and confirmed pT3a at final pathology, the described RAPN technique was able to achieve optimal local cancer control.

Partial versus Radical Nephrectomy for T1-T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage III: a Multiinstitutional Analysis of Kidney Function and Survival Rate

BACKGROUND

To examine survival rates and renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We studied 4,332 patients who underwent PN or RN for pathological T1a-T2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma from 1988 to 2014. Patients were divided into two subgroups of CKD stage I-II and stage III. Kidney function, and survival outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

We included 1,756 patients with CKD I-II and 276 patients with CKD III in the final pair-matched analysis. Kidney function was significantly better preserved in the PN than in the RN group among all patients. However, the beneficial effect of PN on kidney function gradually disappeared over time in CKD III patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after PN and RN differed in patients with CKD I-II disease (99.4% vs. 96.5%, respectively, P = 0.015). The 5-year OS rates after surgery were not affected by mode of nephrectomy in CKD III patients (97.8% vs. 93.5%, P = 0.103). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates did not differ between treatment groups in all CKD stage. Cox hazard analysis showed that the operative method was a significant factor for OS in CKD I-II patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.320; confidence interval [CI], 0.122-0.840; P = 0.021). However, PN was not beneficial in terms of OS in CKD III patients (HR, 0.395; CI, 0.086-1.172; P = 0.117).

CONCLUSION

PN is associated with a higher OS rate and better kidney function in patients with preoperative CKD stage I and II, but not in those with CKD stage III.

Direct Lateral Access to Renal Artery During Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Surgical Technique and Comparative Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with direct lateral access (DLA) to renal artery and to report our early outcomes with this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 135 cases of transperitoneal LPN done by a single surgeon at our tertiary care institution from August 2014 to December 2016 was performed. Standard LPN (n = 73) or DLA-LPN (n = 62) was performed. Relevant clinical data were recorded including baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and surgical outcomes (operative time, artery mobilization time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, complications, and so on). A comparative analysis between standard LPN cases and DLA-LPN was performed.

RESULTS

The use of DLA technique had shorter operative time (P <.001), which was mainly due to a shorter artery mobilization time (18.1 vs 25.6 minutes; P <.001). This time difference was more significant in case of "complex" renal vasculature (2 or more arteries, P <.001). There was no difference in terms of perioperative complications between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSION

DLA to renal artery is safe and feasible, and it may translate into a shorter operative time. This can represent a useful trick to facilitate a challenging step of the LPN procedure, especially in case of complex vascular anatomy.

[Partial nephrectomy for renal masses >7cm: Morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes (UroCCR-7 study)]

OBJECTIVES

To describe the morbidity, mortality, oncological and functional results of Partial nephrectomy (PN) for the treatment of renal tumors of more than 7cm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-seven partial nephrectomies for tumors larger than 7cm operated in a single center between 1987 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The pre, per and postoperative clinico-biological data were collected within the UroCCR database. The GFR was assessed at day 5, 1 month and last follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications, the recurrence rate and the overall and specific mortality were collected.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 57 years (44-68). The preoperative GFR and the median tumor size were 80mL/min and 8cm, respectively. The indication for surgery was elective in 21 cases (60%) and 19 tumors (54%) were malignant. Postoperative complications occurred in 24,3 cases (24.3%). The median post-operative GFR was respectively 77mL/min, 80mL/min and 77mL/min at day 5, 1month and at last follow-up. With a median follow up of 31 months [1-168], 5 patients (26,3%) had metastatic progression of whom 1 (5.3%) had a concomitant local recurrence and 3 (15.8%) had died from cancer.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the feasibility of PN for large tumors with acceptable morbidity, limited risk of local recurrence and excellent functional results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Image-guided minimally invasive treatment for small renal cell carcinoma

Surgical partial nephrectomy is still considered as the "gold standard" for the definitive management of small malignant renal masses, whereas treatment with image-guided percutaneous ablation is still mainly reserved for those patients who cannot undergo nephron-sparing surgical resection due to advanced age, underlying comorbidities or compromised renal function. Nonetheless, the recent evidence that underlines the long-term oncological equipoise of percutaneous ablation methods with surgical resection in combination with the reduced complication rate and cost supports the use of an image-guided minimally invasive approach as a first-line treatment. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of the most widely used percutaneous renal ablation treatments (radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation) with a focus on their main technical aspects and application techniques for curative ablation of small renal cell carcinoma (stage cT1a). The authors also provide a critical narrative of the relevant medical literature with an emphasis on outcomes of comparative effectiveness research, and appraise the percutaneous methods compared to surgery in the context of evidence-based practice and future research studies.

TEACHING POINTS

• RCC is a common cancer and is increasingly detected incidentally at early stages. • There is long-term oncological equipoise of percutaneous ablation compared to surgical resection. • Large-scale trials are required to produce Level 1a evidence.

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for a Peripheral Renal Tumor

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred surgical treatment for T1 renal tumors whenever technically feasible. When properly performed, it allows preservation of nephron mass without compromising oncologic outcomes. This reduces the postoperative risk of renal insufficiency, which translates into better overall survival for the patients. PN can be technically challenging, because it requires the surgeon to complete the tasks of tumor excision, hemostasis and renorrhaphy, all within an ischemic time of preferably below 30 minutes. The surgeon needs to avoid violating the tumor margins while leaving behind the maximal parenchymal volume at the same time. Variations such as zero ischemia, early unclamping, and selective clamping have been developed in an attempt to reduce the negative impact of renal ischemia, but inevitably add to the steep learning curves for any surgeon. Being able to appreciate the fine details of each surgical step in PN is the fundamental basis to the success of this surgery. The use of the robotic assistance allows a good combination of the minimally invasive nature of laparoscopic surgery and the surgical exposure and dexterity of open surgery. It also allows the use of adjuncts such as concurrent ultrasound assessment of the renal mass and intraoperative fluorescence to aid the identification of tumor margins, all with a simple hand switch at the console. Robot-assisted laparoscopic PN is now the most commonly performed type of PN in the United States and is gaining acceptance on the global scale. In this video, we illustrate the steps of robot-assisted laparoscopic PN and highlight the technical key points for success.

Histopathologic analysis of stage pT1b kidney neoplasms for optimal surgical margins of nephron-sparing surgery

Objective

To evaluate the pathological features and define the optimal surgical margins (SM) of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for kidney neoplasms 4–7 cm (stage pT1b) on preoperative imaging.

Materials and methods

The retrospective study included 748 patients who were diagnosed stage pT1b renal tumors and underwent either radical nephrectomy (RN, n = 475) or NSS (n = 273) from January 2004 to March 2017. The tumor size, pathological subtype, Fuhrman grade, status of peritumoral pseudocapsule (PC) and tumor multifocality were recorded. The relationship between peritumoral PC and positive SM was calculated statistically by Fisher’s exact probability test.

Results

The mean tumor diameter was 5.4 cm (range: 4.1–7.0 cm), 65 (8.7%) cases were discovered with multifocal lesions and 686 (91.7%) were surrounded with peritumoral PC in all 748 specimens. 57 (8.3%) of 686 cases were proved with tumor infiltrated beyond PC [infiltration (+)], and the presence of PC infiltration (+) was significantly correlated with positive SM (p = 0.016). The infiltrative depth of tumor cells into renal parenchyma beyond PC was all limited in 3 mm and the proportion of ≤ 1, 1–2 and 2–3 mm was 21.1% (12/57), 59.6% (34/57) and 19.3% (11/57), respectively.

Conclusions

Our report indicates a 3 mm excisional margin is acceptable to ensure negative SM when operating NSS on stage pT1b kidney neoplasms.

Preoperative Nomograms for Predicting Renal Function at 1 Year After Partial Nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy (PN) reduces the risk of postoperative chronic renal insufficiency (CRI). However, some patients still develop CRI after PN, and may eventually require dialysis. Being able to predict renal function before PN helps in counseling patients and managing expectations. We aimed to construct nomograms that predict estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs), defined by the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulae, at 1 year after PN, using only preoperative covariates as predictors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients who underwent PN in our institution between 2004 and 2016, with known postoperative serum creatinine levels at 1 year. The preoperative covariates included patients' demographics, chronic comorbid conditions, tumor characteristics, and preoperative renal status. The endpoints were eGFRs at 1 year after PN, calculated using the MDRD and the CKD-EPI formulae. We first identified preoperative covariates with significant associations with the endpoints by Pearson correlation and independent samples t-test. Suitable covariates were then included in two multivariate linear regression models, for constructing and internally validating two nomograms.

RESULTS

461 patients were eligible for analysis. The percentage of patients with eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² increased from 25% before PN to 35% at 1 year after PN. We included age, gender, African American race, body mass index, preoperative creatinine level, ipsilateral renal volume, solitary kidney status, tumor diameter, hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and previous stroke in the multivariate linear regression models for nomogram construction. Internal validation showed bootstrap-corrected coefficients of determination of 0.61 and 0.70, for predicting eGFRs defined by the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulae, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed and internally validated two nomograms to predict eGFRs at 1 year after PN, using only preoperative covariates as predictors.

The Effect of Patient and Surgical Characteristics on Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to identify patient and disease characteristics that have an adverse effect on renal function after partial nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 387 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for renal tumors between 2006 and 2014. A line plot with a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was generated to visually assess renal function over time. Univariable and multivariable longitudinal regression analyses incorporated a random intercept and slope to evaluate the association between patient and disease characteristics with renal function after surgery.

RESULTS

Median age was 60 years and most patients were male (255 patients [65.9%]) and white (343 patients [88.6%]). In univariable analysis, advanced age at surgery, larger tumor size, male sex, longer ischemia time, history of smoking, and hypertension were significantly associated with lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of reduced renal function after surgery included advanced age, lower preoperative eGFR, and longer ischemia time. Length of time from surgery was strongly associated with improvement in renal function among all patients.

CONCLUSION

Independent predictors of postoperative decline in renal function include advanced age, lower preoperative eGFR, and longer ischemia time. A substantial number of subjects had recovery in renal function over time after surgery, which continued past the 12-month mark. These findings suggest that patients who undergo partial nephrectomy can experience long-term improvement in renal function. This improvement is most pronounced among younger patients with higher preoperative eGFR.

Radical versus partial nephrectomy, chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in US veterans

Background

Partial nephrectomy is considered the preferred care for localized kidney tumors and may yield better patient and kidney survival and similar oncological outcomes compared with radical nephrectomy. We sought to reexamine these hypotheses in a large nationally representative cohort of US veterans who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy.

Methods

We identified 7073 US veterans who had a partial or radical nephrectomy between 2004 and 2013. We collected data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) prior to admission for nephrectomy surgery, immediately after surgery and 180 days postsurgery. We evaluated the association of nephrectomy type and eGFR at different time points with long-term mortality risk in adjusted survival models.

Results

Patients who underwent radical (compared to partial) nephrectomy had a 2-fold greater decline in eGFR (-21.8 ± 17.7 versus -10.3 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) immediately after surgery. This larger drop in eGFR resulted in a larger proportion of radical nephrectomy patients having an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at ≥180 days postsurgery. Radical (compared to partial) nephrectomy patients also exhibited a 2.2-fold higher mortality [adjusted death hazard ratio 2.21 (95% confidence interval 1.91-2.55)]. Low eGFRs prior to surgery and 180 days postsurgery were associated with higher risk of postnephrectomy death.

Conclusions

Worse postnephrectomy kidney function and higher mortality were observed with radical nephrectomy, and a low presurgical eGFR and a greater decrease in eGFR postsurgery were associated with worse mortality irrespective of the type of nephrectomy. Additional studies are needed to examine predictors of postnephrectomy outcomes.

Role of Clinical and Surgical Factors for the Prediction of Immediate, Early and Late Functional Results, and its Relationship with Cardiovascular Outcome after Partial Nephrectomy: Results from the Prospective Multicenter RECORd 1 Project

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the predictors of short-term and long-term renal function impairment after partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data on 769 consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were prospectively recorded at a total of 19 urological Italian centers from 2009 to 2012 in the RECORd 1 (Italian Registry of Conservative Renal Surgery) Project. We extracted clinical data on 708 of these patients who were alive, free of recurrent disease and with a minimum 2-year functional followup.

RESULTS

Of the patients 47.3% underwent open, 36.6% underwent laparoscopic and 16.1% underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. The median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84.5 ml/minute/1.73 m² (IQR 69.9-99.1). Immediate (day 3 postoperatively), early (month 1) and late (month 24) renal function impairment greater than 25% from baseline was identified in 25.3%, 21.6% and 14.8% of cases, respectively. Female gender and the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent predictors of immediate, early and late renal function impairment. Age at diagnosis was an independent predictor of immediate and late impairment. Uncontrolled diabetes was an independent predictor of late impairment only. Open and laparoscopic approaches, and pedicle clamping were independent predictors of immediate and early renal function impairment. Overall 58 of 529 patients (11%) experienced postoperative cardiovascular events. Body mass index and late renal function impairment were independent predictors of those events.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgically modifiable factors were significantly associated with worse immediate and early functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy while clinically unmodifiable factors affected renal function during the entire followup. Late renal function impairment is an independent predictor of postoperative cardiovascular events.

Partial nephrectomy vs. radical nephrectomy for stage I renal cell carcinoma in the presence of predisposing systemic diseases for chronic kidney disease

Aim of this study is to compare the effects of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on renal functions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension (HT). Charts of patients who underwent surgery for stage I RCC in our department were retrospectively reviewed and patients with DM and/or HT were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulation for both RN and PN groups. Groups were compared for patient demographics, preoperative eGFR, postoperative eGFR and ΔeGFR [(preoperative eGFR) - (postoperative eGFR)] which reflects the renal functional loss. There were 85 patients in the RN and 33 patients in the PN groups. Demographic data were similar but the patients in the PN group had smaller tumor size compared to RN group (32.2 ± 11.8 mm vs 47.1 ± 15.2 mm, p < 0.001). Preoperative eGFR did not differ between groups (75 ± 28.4 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 75.5 ± 23.8 mL/min/1.73 m² in RN and PN groups, p = 0.929). However, there were significant differences between groups in terms of postoperative eGFR (57.5 ± 21.7 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 74 ± 27.5 mL/min/1.73 m² in RN and PN groups, p < 0.001) and ΔeGFR (17.5 ± 4.2 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 1.5 ± 0.4 mL/min/1.73 m² in RN and PN groups, p < 0.001). Our findings favor the use of PN over RN for stage I RCC whenever feasible in patients with predisposing systemic diseases for chronic kidney disease for better preservation of renal functions.

Comparison of survival for partial vs. radical nephrectomy in young patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma treated at commission on cancer-accredited facilities and influence of comorbidities on treatment choice

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of data comparing effects of partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. radical nephrectomy (RN) on overall survival in young patients. In this study, the National Cancer Database was used to evaluate the survival outcomes of those treated with PN and RN, and influence of comorbidities on surgical treatment (PN vs. RN) in young patients while accounting for Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Score (CDCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients between 20 and 44 years old (n = 9,849) surgically treated for pT1a renal cell carcinoma between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were performed to compare overall survival and calculate the hazard ratio between those undergoing RN and PN. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for receiving RN compared to PN. The effect measures in all models were adjusted for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

After adjusting for comorbidities, PN offered an overall survival advantage over RN (P<0.001, hazard ratio = 0.464, 95% CI: 0.359-0.601) at a mean follow-up of 48.4 months (0-130.96), including young patients with no comorbidities (P<0.001). Compared to those with a CDCS = 0, patients were more likely to be treated with RN if they had a CDCS>1 (odds ratios = 2.049, 95% CI: 1.527-2.750).

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients treated with PN demonstrate an overall survival advantage. This survival advantage is observed after an early follow-up even in those without comorbidities. It is still not clear if the survival advantage seen is due to treatment itself or selection bias.

Nephron Sparing Surgery Has Better Oncologic Outcomes Than Extirpative Nephrectomy in T1a but Not in T1b or T2 Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of nephron sparing surgery (NSS) compared with extirpative nephrectomy in different tumor stages of renal cell carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for NSS and extirpative nephrectomy in localized (stages T1-2N0M0) renal cell carcinoma diagnosed after 2004. We used the variable screening function of the SEER database to identified 55,947 cases that met inclusion and exclusion criteria for survival analysis. Overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality were the primary index outcomes. Stratification analysis was done by T stage subgroups. We also performed survival analysis using propensity score analysis, and changed the survival model to the competing-risk model for cancer-specific mortality analysis. RESULTS Overall, NSS significantly decreased the risk of overall mortality (HR 0.717, 0.668-0.769) and cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.604, 0.525-0.694) when compared to extirpative nephrectomy. In subgroup analysis, NSS had a lower overall mortality risk and cancer-specific mortality compared to extirpative nephrectomy only for T1a stage renal cell carcinoma (HR 0.654, 0.599-0.714, p<0.01 and HR 0.554, 0.458-0.670, p<0.01, respectively), but not for T1b or T2 stage. The propensity score analysis, which included standardized mortality ratio weight adjustment, showed the same results. Additionally, for cancer-specific mortality, a competing-risk model gave the exactly same outcome. CONCLUSIONS Compared to extirpative nephrectomy, NSS provided superior overall survival and cancer-specific survival for localized renal cell carcinoma only in T1a stage, not in T1b or T2 stage. NSS should be recommended when the surgery is possible. Further prospective study is needed to confirm this result.

The impact of T1 renal tumor characteristics on baseline renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: A renal scan based objective assessment

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To objectively assess the impact of renal tumors characteristics and other measurable factors on baseline renal function in patient undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN).

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic PN for a T1 renal mass between 2012 and 2016 and who also had a mercapto-acetyltriglycine renal scan prior to surgery were retrieved from a single institution prospectively-collected database. Split renal function (SRF) and Effective Renal Plasma Flow (ERPF) for both the operated kidney and the unaffected contralateral were calculated. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics (e.g. size, location and; nephrometry score) were assessed. Renal function of both the operated and the unaffected; contralateral kidney were compared. Statistical analysis was performed by using Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft).

RESULTS

227 patients were deemed eligible and included in the analysis. Univariable analysis showed a significant impact of age-adjusted CCI (p = 0.027), hypertension (p = 0.031) and age (p < 0.001) on operated kidney ERPF. Gender (p = 0.011), hypertension (p = 0.042), CCI (both standard and age-adjusted, p = 0.021 and = 0.003, respectively) and age (p < 0.001) were significantly; associated with contralateral unaffected kidney ERPF. Multivariable analysis confirmed age (p < 0.001) and hypertension (p < 0.021) as independent factors in both the operated and the unaffected kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of the renal mass (including nephrometry score and size) seem to have no clinically relevant impact on baseline renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal tumors. Age, hypertension and co-morbidities confirm to represent un-modifiable significant factors influencing baseline renal function.

[Advancement in the treatment of renal carcinoma]

Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard for the renal tumours less than 7 to 10cm whenever feasible in order to preserve renal function. The extension of nephron-sparing surgery using a mini-invasive approach is possible by robotic surgery. Radical nephrectomy is mandatory in the other situations and especially in case of locally advanced renal carcinoma. The place of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is the purpose of the CARMENA trial. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently the first line treatment; but in the near future new immunotherapy by checkpoints molecules could crucially change the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Numerous trials in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings are ongoing.

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy are the relevant surgical therapy options for localised renal cell carcinoma. However, debate regarding the effects of these surgical approaches continues and it is important to identify and summarise high-quality studies to make surgical treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of partial nephrectomy compared with radical nephrectomy for clinically localised renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS, LILACS, Scopus, two trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 24 February 2017, together with reference lists; and contacted selected experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included a randomised controlled trial comparing partial and radical nephrectomy for participants with small renal masses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author screened all of the titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Next, two review authors independently assessed full-text reports, identified relevant studies, evaluated the eligibility of the studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The update of the literature search was performed by two independent review authors. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and data analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one randomised controlled trial including 541 participants that compared partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy. The median follow-up was 9.3 years.Based on low quality evidence, we found that time-to-death of any cause was decreased using partial nephrectomy (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18). This corresponds to 79 more deaths (5 more to 173 more) per 1000. Also based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in serious adverse events (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.19 to 22.34). Findings are consistent with 4 more surgery-related deaths (3 fewer to 78 more) per 1000.Based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in time-to-recurrence (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.24). This corresponds to 12 more recurrences (14 fewer to 70 more) per 1000. Due to the nature of reporting, we were unable to analyse overall rates for immediate and long-term adverse events. We found no evidence on haemodialysis or quality of life.Reasons for downgrading related to study limitations (lack of blinding, cross-over), imprecision and indirectness (a substantial proportion of patients were ultimately found not to have a malignant tumour). Based on the finding of a single trial, we were unable to conduct any subgroup or sensitivity analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy may be associated with a decreased time-to-death of any cause. With regards to surgery-related mortality, cancer-specific survival and time-to-recurrence, partial nephrectomy appears to result in little to no difference.

Exploratory Subgroup Analyses of Renal Function and Overall Survival in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial of Nephron-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

In the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized trial 30904, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) reduced the risk of renal dysfunction compared with radical nephrectomy (RN); however, overall survival was better in the RN arm.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether treatment effect on the risk of renal dysfunction and all-cause mortality differed in magnitude across levels of baseline variables.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was an exploratory subgroup analysis of EORTC 30904, a phase 3 randomized trial conducted in patients with a small (≤5cm) renal mass and normal contralateral kidney.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to RN (n=273) or NSS (n=268).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

End points included follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60ml/min/1.73m², eGFR <45ml/min/1.73m², eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m², and all-cause mortality. Treatment effect was examined within baseline variables: age (<62 vs ≥62 yr), sex, chronic disease (any vs none), performance status (0 vs≥1), and serum creatinine ≤1.25 vs >1.25×upper limit of normal (ULN). Logistic and Cox regression models were used for analysis of renal dysfunction and all-cause mortality, respectively.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median follow-up periods were 6.7 yr for eGFR and 9.3 yr for survival. No variable-by-treatment interactions were significant at alpha=0.05. For patients with baseline creatinine >1.25×ULN (n=36), estimated mortality hazard ratio (HR) for NSS versus RN reversed its direction (HR=0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-3.39) relative to the rest of the study cohort (HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.06-2.29), although this reversal was not statistically significant (interaction p=0.25). This analysis was limited by low power.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory analysis did not reveal strong evidence of treatment effect modification in EORTC 30904, but it was limited by low power.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We aimed to determine whether the effect of partial versus radical nephrectomy on kidney function and overall survival depended on age, sex, and baseline health of patients enrolled in a large clinical trial. Such dependence could not be demonstrated in this analysis.