Acute antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation

Epithelial and Erythrocyte Microvesicles From Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Are Elevated and Associated With Outcome in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major outcome limitation for lung transplant recipients (LTR) after the first year, and therapies targeting immunological pathways show only limited success. Because microvesicles (MV) are biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and coagulation but are also involved in immunological responses, we hypothesized that MV, found in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids (BALF) of LTR at CLAD diagnosis, are elevated and potential prognostic biomarkers.

METHODS

The BALF was collected from 37 LTR at time point of CLAD diagnosis and 37 LTR without any complication at routinely performed BAL. The MV concentration and origin were determined by flow cytometry by detection of different antigens. Patient- and transplant-related risk factors were included in a retrospective statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The BALF-MV levels of epithelial and red blood cell (RBC) origin were significantly higher in CLAD patients (mean: 1533/μL and 158/μL) compared to controls (436/μL, 57/μL). The LTR with high levels of epithelial MV >580/μL showed a significantly shorter overall survival at 4 years after BAL (39.5%) compared to patients with low MV (66.4%) and this proofed to be an independent prognostic factor in multivariate Cox analysis (hazards ratio = 3.05). Furthermore, LTR with high levels of RBC MV ≥225/μL were also associated with worse disease-specific survival, with probabilities at 4 years after BAL of 85.8% vs. 36.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Epithelial and RBC BALF-MV are elevated at CLAD diagnosis, have a potential as biomarkers, and support the hypothesis of a pathway, including activation of coagulation and complement, endothelial barrier dysfunction, and microangiopathy.

Lung Transplantation

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disorders are currently limited. Lung transplantation remains one of the few viable interventions, but on account of the insufficient donor pool only a minority of these patients actually undergo the procedure each year. Following transplantation there are a number of early and late allograft complications such as primary graft dysfunction, allograft rejection, infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and late injury that is now classified as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The pathologist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and classification of these myriad complications. Although the transplant procedures are performed in selected centers patients typically return to their local centers. When complications arise it is often the responsibility of the local pathologist to evaluate specimens. Therefore familiarity with the pathology of lung transplantation is important.

Antibody-mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation

There has been increasing awareness of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as an important cause of graft failure after lung transplantation in recent years. However, the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary AMR are not well defined. All four tenets of AMR in kidney and heart transplantation, graft dysfunction, complement component deposition, circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and histopathologic changes consistent with AMR, are infrequently present in lung transplantation. Nonetheless, the lung transplant community has made important progress recognizing cases of AMR and developing a definition. However, AMR is often refractory to therapy resulting in graft failure and death. In this review, we discuss the progress and challenges in the diagnosis and therapeutic options for pulmonary AMR. In addition, we briefly examine emerging paradigms of C4d-negative AMR and chronic AMR, and conclude that significant progress is needed to mitigate the effects of humoral immune responses after lung transplantation.

Effects of complement activation on allograft injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current knowledge regarding mechanisms linking the complement system to transplant injury, highlighting findings reported since 2013.

RECENT FINDINGS

Building upon the documentation that complement activation is a pathogenic mediator of posttransplant ischemia-reperfusion injury, emerging evidence from animal models indicates that blocking either the classical or lectin pathways attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury. Immune cell-derived and locally activated complement, including intracellular C3, positively modulates alloreactive T-cell activation and expansion, whereby simultaneously inhibiting regulatory T-cell induction and function, and together promoting transplant rejection. Although alloantibody-initiated complement activation directly injures target cells, complement-dependent signals activate endothelial cells to facilitate T-cell-dependent inflammation. Complement activation within allografts contributes to progressive chronic injury and fibrosis.

SUMMARY

The complement cascade, traditionally considered to be relevant to transplantation only as an effector mechanism of antibody-initiated allograft injury, is now understood to damage the allograft through multiple mechanisms. Complement activation promotes posttransplant ischemia-reperfusion injury, formation and function of alloantibody, differentiation and function of alloreactive T cells, and contributes to chronic progressive allograft failure. The recognition that complement affects transplant injury at many levels provides a foundation for targeting complement as a therapy to prolong transplant survival and improve patient health.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome due to donor-specific HLA-antibodies

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is a limiting factor for long-term survival in lung transplant recipients. Donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibodies (DSA) have been suggested as potential risk factors for CLAD. However, their impact on clinical outcome following lung transplantation remains controversial. We performed a single-center study of 120 lung transplant recipients transplanted between 2006 and 2011. Patient sera were investigated before and after transplantation. The sera were screened by means of Luminex(®) technology (Luminex Inc., Austin, TX, USA) for IgG-HLA-class I and class II antibodies (ab). Using single antigen beads, DSA were identified and correlated retrospectively with clinical parameters. After transplantation 39 out of 120 patients (32.5%) were positive for HLA-ab. The incidence of de novo DSA formation was 27 of 120 patients (22.5%). Eleven of 27 (41%) of de novo DSA-positive patients developed BOS compared to 13 of 93 (14%) DSA-negative patients (p = 0.002). Furthermore, the generation of de novo DSA was independently associated with the development of BOS in multivariable analysis [hazard ration (HR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-6.08; p = 0.046). Our results indicate that de novo DSA are associated with the development of BOS after lung transplantation. Monitoring of HLA-ab after transplantation is useful for identifying high-risk patients and offers an opportunity for early therapeutic intervention.

The impact of pre-transplant allosensitization on outcomes after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allosensitization can be a significant barrier to transplantation for some patients, and previous studies suggested that pre-transplant allosensitization was associated with worse outcomes after lung transplantation. However, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody testing has evolved significantly over the past 10 years, and current assays are highly sensitive and specific.

METHODS

We examined the impact of pre-transplant allosensitization on post-transplant outcomes in the era of solid-phase multiplex HLA antibody detection assays in this retrospective, single-center study of 304 adult transplant recipients between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2012. We accepted donor organs for allosensitized patients if a virtual crossmatch was compatible with all previously identified antibodies.

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, pre-transplant allosensitization, the calculated panel reactive antibody, and the number of pre-transplant HLA antibodies were not associated with the development of acute cellular rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, donor-specific HLA antibodies, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, or graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-transplant allosensitization does not adversely affect outcomes after lung transplantation when the potentially reactive HLAs are avoided in the donor by a virtual crossmatch with the recipient.

Survival in sensitized lung transplant recipients with perioperative desensitization

Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have an adverse effect on short-term and long-term lung transplant outcomes. We implemented a perioperative strategy to treat DSA-positive recipients, leading to equivalent rejection and graft survival outcomes. Pretransplant DSA were identified to HLA-A, B, C, DR and DQ antigens. DSA-positive patients were transplanted if panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≥30% or medically urgent and desensitized with perioperative plasma exchange, intravenous immune globulin, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and mycophenolic acid (MPA). PRA-positive/DSA-negative recipients received MPA. Unsensitized patients received routine cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisone without ATG. From 2008-2011, 340 lung-only first transplants were performed: 53 DSA-positive, 93 PRA-positive/DSA-negative and 194 unsensitized. Thirty-day survival was 96 %/99%/96% in the three groups, respectively. One-year graft survival was 89%/88%/86% (p = 0.47). DSA-positive and PRA-positive/DSA-negative patients were less likely to experience any ≥ grade 2 acute rejection (9% and 9% vs. 18% unsensitized p = 0.04). Maximum predicted forced expiratory volume (1 s) (81%/74%/76%, p = NS) and predicted forced vital capacity (81%/77%/78%, respectively, p = NS) were equivalent between groups. With the application of this perioperative treatment protocol, lung transplantation can be safely performed in DSA/PRA-positive patients, with similar outcomes to unsensitized recipients.

What's new in clinical solid organ transplantation by 2013

Innovative and exciting advances in the clinical science in solid organ transplantation continuously realize as the results of studies, clinical trials, international conferences, consensus conferences, new technologies and discoveries. This review will address to the full spectrum of news in transplantation, that verified by 2013. The key areas covered are the transplantation activity, with particular regards to the donors, the news for solid organs such as kidney, pancreas, liver, heart and lung, the news in immunosuppressive therapies, the news in the field of tolerance and some of the main complications following transplantation as infections and cancers. The period of time covered by the study starts from the international meetings held in 2012, whose results were published in 2013, up to the 2013 meetings, conferences and consensus published in the first months of 2014. In particular for every organ, the trends in numbers and survival have been reviewed as well as the most relevant problems such as organ preservation, ischemia reperfusion injuries, and rejections with particular regards to the antibody mediated rejection that involves all solid organs. The new drugs and strategies applied in organ transplantation have been divided into new way of using old drugs or strategies and drugs new not yet on the market, but on phase Ito III of clinical studies and trials.

Preemptive treatment with therapeutic plasma exchange and rituximab for early donor-specific antibodies after lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

De novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies develop in a high proportion of lung transplant recipients early after lung transplantation. We recently showed that de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) occurrence is associated with significantly increased mortality. Here, we studied the efficacy of a preemptive treatment protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on all lung transplantations at Hanover Medical School between January 2009 and May 2013.

RESULTS

Among the 500 transplant recipients, early DSA developed in 86 (17%). Of these, 56 patients (65%; Group A) received therapeutic plasma exchange, and 30 patients (35%; Group B) did not. Among Group A patients, 51 also received rituximab. Between groups, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality, incidence of pulsed steroid therapies, rejections diagnosed by biopsy specimen, incidence of bronchitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), or infections requiring hospitalization at 1 year and 3 years. Also, there were no statistically significant differences after matching 21 Group A with 21 Group B patients through propensity score analysis. Significantly more Group A patients (65%) than Group B patients (34%) cleared DSA at hospital discharge (p = 0.01). At the last control after transplantation (median, 14 months; interquartile range, 5-24 months), 11 Group A (22%) and 9 Group B patients (33%) still showed DSA (p = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive treatment with therapeutic plasma exchange and rituximab led to improved elimination of DSA early after lung transplantation (p = 0.01). However, spontaneous elimination in untreated Group B patients also occurred frequently. This treatment protocol was not associated with significantly improved outcome.

Lung transplant immunosuppression - time for a new approach?

Outcomes after lung transplantation remain worse compared to other solid organ transplants, which is in large part due to high rates of graft rejection. Despite emerging data that immune responses to lungs differ from other organs, immunosuppression for lung transplant recipients is still based on strategies established for recipients of other grafts. There exists an urgent need to develop immunosuppressive strategies for lung transplant recipients that take the unique immunological features of this organ into account.

Update on Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation has become an important therapeutic option for patients with end-stage organ dysfunction; however, its clinical usefulness has been limited by the relatively early onset of chronic allograft dysfunction and progressive clinical decline. Obliterative bronchiolitis is characterized histologically by luminal fibrosis of the respiratory bronchioles and clinically by bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) which is defined by a measured decline in lung function based on forced expiratory volume (FEV₁). Since its earliest description, a number of risk factors have been associated with the development of BOS, including acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, primary graft dysfunction, infection, donor specific antibodies, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, despite this broadened understanding, the pathogenesis underlying BOS remains poorly understood and once begun, there are relatively few treatment options to battle the progressive deterioration in lung function.

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with early and high-grade bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and death after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody responses has been associated with worse clinical outcomes, such as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and death, in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). However, the role of donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) responses as a risk factor for poor outcomes remains controversial.

METHODS

We prospectively screened 445 LTRs for DSA at our institution at the time of surveillance bronchoscopies for the first 2 years after transplantation between 2003 and 2008, and evaluated clinical outcomes. For this purpose, we used the combination of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the Luminex single-antigen bead (SAB) assay (One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA).

RESULTS

We detected de novo DSA (dnDSA) in 58 of 445 (13%) LTRs in our cohort. Freedom from BOS was significantly reduced in LTRs with dnDSA versus those without dnDSA (p < 0.001). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, the development of dnDSA was associated with a significantly increased hazard ratio (HR = 6.59 [4.53 to 9.59]; p < 0.001) for BOS and high-grade BOS (Stage ≥ 2) (HR = 5.76 [3.48 to 9.52]; p < 0.001). Freedom from death was significantly reduced in LTRs with dnDSA (p < 0.001), including mortality attributable to BOS (HR = 9.86 [4.91 to 19.78]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our findings provide evidence that dnDSA is associated with accelerated BOS kinetics and severity, as well as death due to BOS after lung transplantation. In addition, these data support regular monitoring for the development of dnDSA in LTRs and underscore the need for novel strategies to mitigate the increased risk of poor outcomes associated with dnDSA.

Early donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation: risk factors and impact on survival

BACKGROUND

The impact of early donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) on patient and graft survival after lung transplantation remains controversial. In this study we analyzed risk factors for DSA that developed before initial hospital discharge after lung transplantation (early DSA) and compared mid-term outcomes in patients with or without DSA.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and August 2013, 546 patients underwent lung transplantation at our institution. One hundred (18%) patients developed early DSA (Group A) and 446 (82%) patients (Group B) did not. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Retransplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 6.5, p = 0.03), pre-operative HLA antibodies (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.4, p = 0.003) and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) score Grade 2 or 3 at 48 hours (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.6, p = 0.001) were associated with early DSA development. Overall, 1- and 3-year survival in Group A and B patients was 79 ± 4% vs 88 ± 2% and 57 ± 8% vs 74 ± 3%, respectively (p = 0.019). Eleven Group A (11%) and 32 Group B (7%) patients died before hospital discharge (p = 0.34). Among patients surviving beyond discharge, 1- and 3-year survival in Group A and B patients was 89 ± 4% vs 95 ± 1% and 65 ± 8% vs 80 ± 3% in Group A and B patients, respectively (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified early anti-HLA Class II DSA (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p = 0.04) as an independent risk factor for post-discharge mortality but not for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative HLA antibodies, retransplantation or post-operative PGD increase the risk of developing early DSA, which were independently associated with an increased risk for mortality.

Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions

The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19-23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2-day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter-observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis ("isolated v") represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated.