Alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines--Part II. National Alopecia Areata Foundation

Efficacy of a mixed preparation containing piperine, capsaicin and curcumin in the treatment of alopecia areata

Alopecia areata is a common non-scarring alopecia, mainly manifested as sudden localized patchy alopecia. It is currently believed to be related to autoimmune, genetic, emotional stress and endocrine factors. 60 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into 2 groups randomly: topical treated with the mixed preparation (case) twice daily and minoxidil (control) once daily for 3 months. The degree of hair loss was assessed by SALT and dermoscopy . Based on our findings, the mixed preparation of piperine, capsaicin and curcumin is effective in treating alopecia areata, but it has not been shown to be superior to minoxidil in short-term therapy.

The effect of latanoprost 0.005% solution in the management of scalp alopecia areata, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a recurrent chronic disease that affects hair follicles and results in hair loss. Make an increase in the number, thickness, and length of eyelashes is an important side effect of latanoprost eye drop.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hypertrichosis property of latanoprost in the treatment of scalp AA.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, thirty participants with scalp AA assigned to receive either topical latanoprost 0.005% solution or placebo for 12 weeks. In both arms, patients also received clobetasol 0.05% cream in isopropyl alcohol (1:1). The hair loss area pictured at baseline and the end of the fourth, eighth, and twelfth weeks. According to the images, the dermatologist assessed the hair loss area, hair density, and the severity of alopecia.

RESULTS

Latanoprost significantly increased hair density (37.2± 26.1 vs. 14.6 ± 18.6) and regrowth (58.3 ± 39.3 vs. 21.6 ± 24.1) based on the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) system compared to the control group (P=0.03 and 0.02, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in reduction in the hair loss area and SALT, and the incidence of side effects (P=0.718, 0.262, and ≥0.99, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Results showed the acceptable safety and efficacy of latanoprost 0.005% solution to increase hair density and regrowth. So, it could be safely used for the management of scalp AA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

MicroRNA-17-92a-1 Host Gene (MIR17HG) Expression Signature and rs4284505 Variant Association with Alopecia Areata: A Case-Control Study

Accumulating evidence indicates the implication of microRNAs (miRs) in cutaneous and hair follicle immunobiology. We evaluated, for the first time, the miR-17-92a-1 cluster host gene (MIR17HG) expression in peripheral blood of 248 unrelated alopecia areata (AA) patients compared to 244 matched controls using Real-Time qPCR. We also tested its association with different rs4284505A>G genotypes (based on TaqMan allelic discrimination PCR) and the available clinical data. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each genetic association model. The upregulation of miR-17 was observed in the serum of patients with alopecia compared to controls (p-value = 0.004). The ROC curve showed high diagnostic performance of miR-17 in differentiating between patients and controls (AUC = 0.85, p-value < 0.001). rs4284505*A/G heterozygotes were more susceptible to the disease (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.01−2.45) under the over-dominant model. Interestingly, patients with the rs4284505*G/G genotype had a higher level of miR-17 than those with the A/A and A/G genotypes. The G/G genotype was associated with the severe phenotype (p-value = 0.038). A/G carriers were the youngest (p-value < 0.001), had more frequent scalp infection (p-value = 0.006), exhibited the worst dermatology life quality index score (p-value = 0.037), and responded less to treatment (p-value = 0.033). In conclusion, MIR17HG expression and the rs4284505 variant were significantly associated with AA and could play a role in pathogenesis and phenotype in the Egyptian population. Further multi-center studies in other ethnicities are warranted to replicate the findings.

Gene Expression of CD70 and CD27 Is Increased in Alopecia Areata Lesions and Associated with Disease Severity and Activity

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) is an acquired hair loss disorder induced by a cell-mediated autoimmune attack against anagen hair follicles. CD27-CD70 is a receptor-ligand complex which enhances T helper and cytotoxic T cell activation, survival, and proliferation. The overstimulation of this complex can lead to a lack of tolerance and the development of autoimmunity.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the gene expression of CD27 and CD70 in patients with AA.

Methods

CD70 and CD27 mRNA expressions were evaluated by a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in scalp biopsies from 40 AA patients (both AA lesions and non-lesional areas) and 40 healthy controls (HCs). The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score was used to assess AA severity. Patients were evaluated for signs of AA activity, including a positive hair pull test and dermoscopic features of black dots, broken hairs, and tapering hairs.

Results

The gene expression of CD70 and CD27 was significantly higher in AA lesions than in non-lesional areas (p < 0.001 for both) and HCs (p=0.004, p=0.014, respectively). There were significant positive correlations between AA severity and gene expression of CD70 (p < 0.001) and CD27 (p=0.030) in AA lesions. Significant associations were detected between signs of AA activity and lesional gene expression of CD70 and CD27. Additionally, CD70 and CD27 gene expression was significantly lower in non-lesional biopsies compared to HCs (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Gene expression of CD70 and CD27 was increased in AA lesions and was associated with disease severity and activity. Thus, both molecules can be a predictor of AA severity and activity. Furthermore, the expression was reduced in non-lesional scalp areas. Thus, a lack of CD27 and CD70 expression may initially predispose to immunological dysregulation and the development of AA.

Successful Therapy of Alopecia Universalis Using a Combination of Systemic Methotrexate and Corticosteroids and Topical 5% Minoxidil

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease-specific to specific organs mediated by T lymphocytes with hair follicles as targets. Severe AA could be in the form of alopecia universalis (AU). AU therapy is relatively difficult and challenging with varying outcomes. Herein, we reported a case of AU in a 19-year-old man with alopecia in the hairy scalp area, eyebrows, eyelashes, moustache, beard, and axillary hair since 2.5 years ago. The patient’s severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score was 100%. The patient was given a combination therapy of 15 mg methotrexate per week and 16 mg methylprednisolone per day orally and topical treatment with minoxidil 5%. Observations after nine months of treatment showed an improvement in the decrease in SALT scores to 41%. However, striae were found after 3rd month of therapy. Systemic combination therapy of methotrexate and low-dose corticosteroids and topical minoxidil 5% in this patient gave responsive results. Performed the hematological examination, liver function levels, blood glucose levels, and cortisol during long-term use of methotrexate and corticosteroids are necessary. The combination of systemic methotrexate and corticosteroids, and topical minoxidil showed promising results in AU. Nevertheless, long-term observation is still needed to monitor the side effects of therapy.

Alopecia areata - Current understanding and management

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by acute or chronic non-scarring hair loss, with a heterogeneity in clinical manifestations ranging from patchy hair loss to complete scalp and body hair loss. An overview of the up-to-date pathophysiology and the underlying signaling pathways involved in AA together with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations will be provided. Current treatments, including topical, systemic and injectable interventions show varying response and frequent relapses reflecting the unmet clinical need. Thus, the new emerging concepts and therapeutic approaches, including Janus kinase inhibitors are eagerly awaited. Traditional and emerging therapies of AA will be discussed, in order to provide physicians with guidance for AA management. Since the latter is so challenging and often tends to take a chronic course, it can have an enormous psychosocial burden on patients, compromising their quality of life and often causing depression and anxiety. Therefore, the psychosocial aspects of the disease need to be evaluated and addressed, in order to implement appropriate psychological support when needed.

Low Level Laser versus Platelet-rich Plasma in Treatment of Alopecia Areata: A Randomized Controlled Intra-patient Comparative Study

Abstract                                                                                                           Background: Non-scarring alopecia areata (AA) is a disease that is mediated through autoimmunity. Recently, autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and photobiomodulation (PBM), commonly known as low-level laser (or light, LLLT) have been suggested to provide a valuable role in stimulating the growth of hair follicles (HF) Aim: Compare between the significance and wellbeing of PRP and LLLT in the management of AA. Patients & methodology: Thirty patients, each having three patches of AA participated in the study. Patches were assigned randomly to have one of the two treatments: PRP or LLLT. The third patch served as a control and received placebo treatment. PRP was done once weekly whereas LLLT was done 3 sessions per week for a maximum of 6 weeks. Patients were followed up at one month and three months. The thickness and density of hair were evaluated by the folliscope. Results: A noteworthy higher improvement was detected in the thickness and the density of hair in the PRP treated patches as evaluated by the folliscope and patients satisfaction. The obtained outcomes were sustained during the 12 week follow-up period in most of patients. Conclusion: PRP and LLLT could be considered as efficacious alternatives for the treatments of  AA with the least morbidity in addition to a little cost profit ratio. KEYWORDS: Alopecia areata, platelet-rich plasma, folliscope, photobiomodulation, low level laser therapy.  

An evaluation of anxiety disorder and emotion regulation difficulty in children and adolescents with alopecia areata

Context:

The relationship between alopecia areata (AA) and emotion regulation difficulty has not yet been fully explained.

Aims:

The aim of the study was to investigate the levels of anxiety and emotion regulation difficulty in children diagnosed with AA.

Settings and Design:

This case-control study was done in the university setting.

Methods:

Behavioral tests measuring anxiety and emotion regulation difficulties, and the measures assessing AA severity were applied to 32 AA patients consulted at Dermatology Clinic of Yozgat Bozok University. A control group was formed of 36 healthy children.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's and Fisher's Chi-square tests and Spearman's correlation test.

Results:

Evaluation was made of a total of 68 subjects (32 patients, 36 healthy subjects). The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)-total score and the DERS-clarity subscore were statistically significantly higher in the control group than in the patient group (P = 0.021, P = 0.003, respectively). No significant difference was determined between the two groups in respect of anxiety levels. No correlation was determined between disease severity and the scales. It was determined that as disease duration increased, so the DERS-non-acceptance subscale score increased, and with an increase in age, the SAI score of the AA patients increased. The DERS-impulse subscale score was seen to be statistically significantly higher in the boys with AA than in girls (P = 0.030).

Conclusions:

The results of this study showed that a visible, chronic, recurrent disease such as AA is not always seen with high psychiatric comorbidity and that together with the presence of the disease, patient age and disease duration are also important. It can be considered that AA may have been affected by the location, time and conditions of the study.

Impact of Pediatric Alopecia Areata on Quality of Life of Patients and Their Family Members: A Nationwide Multicenter Questionnaire Study

Background

Pediatric alopecia areata (AA) can affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their family members. Research on the QoL and burden on family members in pediatric AA is limited.

Objective

This nationwide multicenter questionnaire study described the QoL and burden of the family members of patients with pediatric AA.

Methods

This nationwide multicenter questionnaire study enrolled AA patients between the ages of 5 and 18 years from March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018. Enrolled patients and their parents completed the modified Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the modified Dermatitis Family Impact (mDFI). The disease severity was measured using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) survey scores.

Results

A total of 268 patients with AA from 22 hospitals participated in this study. Our study found that the efficacy and satisfaction of previous treatments of AA decreased as the severity of the disease increased. The use of home-based therapies and traditional medicines increased with the increasing severity of the disease, but the efficacy felt by patients was limited. CDLQI and mDFI scores were higher in patients with extensive AA than those with mild to moderate AA. The economic and time burden of the family members also increased as the severity of the disease increased.

Conclusion

The severity of the AA is indirectly proportional to the QoL of patients and their family members and directly proportional to the burden. Physicians need to understand these characteristics of pediatric AA and provide appropriate intervention to patients and their family members.

Comparative study between the efficacies of azathioprine and mesalazine in the treatment of severe alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Various systemic agents have been assessed for treatment of alopecia areata; however, there is a paucity of comparative studies.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of azathioprine versus mesalazine in the treatment of severe alopecia areata.

METHODS

Our study was carried out in 30 patients with severe alopecia areata divided into two groups, group A: fifteen patients were treated by azathioprine in an oral dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day and group B: fifteen patients were treated by mesalazine in an oral dose of 15-30 mg/kg/day in two divided doses. The treatment was considered effective if percentage regrowth of hair was determined by change in SALT score >50 from base line after 6 months of treatment. The treatment was continued for 3-6 months after complete remission to minimize the risk of relapse. The dose was gradually tapered during this time.

RESULTS

The study found that there is statistically significant difference between mean SALT scores before treatment and after 6 months of treatment in both groups. In group A, SALT score at base line was 84.42 ± 17.41, after 6 months it was 35.95 ± 35.79 (p value 0.04). In group B, SALT score at base line was 73.06 ± 22.10, after 6 months it was 23.04± 12.27 (p value 0.037). Changes in SALT score after 6 months were -27.74 ± 20.66 in group A and -60.42±38.41 in group B (p value 0.055).

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine may be considered as effective as azathioprine with lesser side effects. Azathioprine is also considered safe. However, a large group study should be performed to confirm these findings.

Validation of the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Questionnaire in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata

Introduction

Individuals with alopecia areata (AA) may experience significant impacts on their health-related quality of life. The novel Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) questionnaire has been developed to assess hair loss signs, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations associated with AA. The objective of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties and establish scoring of the AAPPO in adults and adolescents with AA.

Methods

Scoring and measurement properties of the AAPPO were examined using baseline and 2-week follow-up data from a prospective, noninterventional, web-based study of 121 patients with AA (85 adults aged ≥ 18 years, 36 adolescents aged 12–17 years) with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) ≥ 25% scalp hair loss.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported four single Hair Loss (HL) items, an Emotional Symptoms domain (ES; 4 items), and an Activity Limitations domain (AL; 3 items). Among all patients, the multi-item ES and AL domains had strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.87); all HL items and domain scores had strong test-retest reliability (weighted kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.78). All HL item scores demonstrated strong construct validity (r ≥ 0.52) compared with the patient-reported Alopecia Areata Symptom and Impact Scale (AASIS) hair loss subscale score; ES and AL domain scores exhibited strong construct validity (r ≥ 0.66) compared with the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Using SALT scores, HL mean item scores were better (lower) in the 25–49% SALT subgroup versus those with highest SALT scores (76–100%); however, ES mean domain scores were better in the SALT 76–100% subgroup in the same comparison (p < 0.0001). Using AASIS and MCS score–created subgroups, ES and AL mean domain scores demonstrated hypothesized differences across subgroups (all p values < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The AAPPO questionnaire is a reliable, valid disease-specific measure of hair loss severity and impact in individuals with AA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00648-z.

Effectiveness of QR678 and QR678 Neo® with intralesional corticosteroid vs. intralesional corticosteroid alone in the treatment of alopecia areata -A randomized, comparative, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is an inflammatory disorder, marked by chronic, persistent, and patchy loss of hair. At present intralesional/topical corticosteroids, Minoxidil solution, and topical immune-therapies are used for treatment. Though all these have side effects and high rate of relapse. As QR678 Neo^® is proved to be effective in hair regrowth in male and female pattern hair loss, the aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of QR678 Neo^® with intralesional steroid therapy vs. intralesional steroid alone in the treatment of AA of scalp in men and women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 20 participants in age group of 20-50 years with nonscarring patchy hair loss were chosen for the study. Patients were arbitrarily divided into two groups (Group A-intralesional steroid with placebo and Group B-intralesional steroid with QR678 Neo^® ). All the participants were evaluated at baseline, 3 months and 6 months with standard global photography, dermoscopic assessment, and self-evaluation questionnaire at the end of study.

RESULT

Marked improvement was seen in the global assessment score after 6 months (mean- 6.6 SALT) as compared to baseline (38.5 SALT score) in group B. There was significant reduction of black dots, yellow dots, broken hairs, and tapered hair at 6 months on video dermoscopic examination in group B. Also, higher satisfaction was experienced with the treatment in group B patients.

CONCLUSION

QR678 Neo^® in combination with intralesional steroids therapy proved to be significantly beneficial, efficient, and can be considered as safer treatment option for alopecia areata.

A qualitative interview study to explore adolescents' experience of alopecia areata and the content validity of sign/symptom patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures

BACKGROUND

The content validity (appropriateness and acceptability) of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for scalp hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss, nail damage and eye irritation has been demonstrated in adults with alopecia areata (AA) but not adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the content validity of the suite of AA PRO measures and accompanying photoguides in an adolescent sample.

METHODS

Semi-structured, 90-minute, combined concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were conducted face-to-face with adolescents who experienced ≥50% AA-related scalp hair loss. Transcripts underwent thematic and framework analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven adolescents (age 12-17 years, 55% female, 45% non-Caucasian/white) diagnosed with AA for 5.9 years (mean) participated. Participants had 69.6% scalp hair (mean) and current eyebrow (82%), eyelash loss (82%) and/or nail involvement (36%). Adolescents reported scalp, eyebrow and eyelash hair loss as their top three most bothersome signs/symptoms. Despite mostly accepting their AA, impacts related to visible areas of hair loss were prominent. Participants demonstrated good understanding and appropriate use of the PRO measures, and advocated including hair loss percentages alongside descriptive categories in the Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™. Results confirmed treatment success thresholds established with adults: achievement of ≤20% scalp hair loss, no/minimal eyebrow and eyelash loss, no/a little nail damage and eye irritation (PRO categories 0 or 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™, PRO Measure for Eyebrows™, PRO Measure for Eyelashes™, PRO Measure for Nail Appearance™ and PRO Measure for Eye Irritation™ and accompanying photoguides are fit-for-purpose self-reported measures of AA signs/symptoms that are impactful to adolescents with AA.

The MCP-1 rs1024611 and MTHFR rs1801133 gene variations and expressions in alopecia areata: A pilot study

Background

Monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1) is highly expressed by lymphocytes at skin sites affected by alopecia areata (AA). Variations in MCP‐1 as well as in methylene‐tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), a key enzyme related to many inflammatory pathologies, have been associated with several autoimmune disorders. This study was designed to test a possible association between MCP‐1 and MTHFR variations and altered expression of their genes and the risk of AA.

Methods

Blood samples of patients (60) suffering from AA as well as healthy subjects (60) were collected. Gene expression levels of MCP‐1 and MTHFR were evaluated by real‐time reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. Moreover, MCP‐1 rs1024611 (A‐2518G) and MTHFR rs1801133 (C677T) polymorphisms were genotyped by using polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism assays.

Results

In contrast to MCP‐1, the MTHFR gene expression was found to be significantly higher in patients than in controls. Further stratification of the patients revealed that polymorphic genotypes in MCP‐1 (AG + GG) and MTHFR (CT + TT) could significantly alter gene expression levels. Elevation of MCP‐1 expression was significantly associated with the total number of variant MCP‐1 and MTHFR alleles. However, no statistically significant difference was noticed in the genotypic distribution of MCP‐1 and MTHFR variations between patients and controls.

Conclusion

In summary, despite MCP‐1 rs1024611 and MTHFR rs1801133 variations are not associated with AA risk, they may implicate the disease pathogenesis by influencing MCP‐1 activity.

Alopecia areata: Current understanding of the pathophysiology and update on therapeutic approaches, featuring the Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines

Alopecia areata (AA) is a relatively common nonscarring hairloss disease characterized by an autoimmune response to anagen hair follicles (HFs). Accumulated evidence suggests that collapse of the HF immune privilege subsequent to triggering events, represented by viral infection, leads to autoimmune response in which autoreactive cytotoxic CD8+NKG2D+ T cells mainly target exposed HF autoantigens. AA had been recognized as type 1 inflammatory disease, but recent investigations have suggested some roles of type 2- and Th17-associated mediators in AA pathogenesis. The significance of psychological stress in AA pathogenesis is less emphasized nowadays, but psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety, attract greater interest in AA management. In this regard, the disease severity may not solely be evaluated by the extent of hair loss. Use of trichoscopy markedly improved the resolution of the diagnosis and evaluation of the phase of AA, which is indispensable for the optimization of treatment. For the standardization of AA management, the establishment of guidelines/expert consensus is pivotal. Indeed, the Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) and other societies and expert groups have published guidelines/expert consensus reports, which mostly recommend intralesional/topical corticosteroid administration and contact immunotherapy as first-line treatments, depending on the age, disease severity, and activity of AA. The uniqueness of the JDA guidelines can be found in their descriptions of intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy, antihistamines, and other miscellaneous domestically conducted treatments. Considering the relatively high incidence of spontaneous regression in mild AA and its intractability in severe subsets, the importance of course observation is also noted. Evidenced-based medicine for AA is currently limited, however, novel therapeutic approaches, represented by JAK inhibitors, are on their way for clinical application. In this review, the latest understanding of the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology, and update on therapeutic approaches with future perspectives are summarized for AA, following the current version of the JDA AA management guidelines.

A prospective comparative study of two regimens of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) in the treatment of alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic disorder and the best treatment regimen for it is unknown. Currently, one of the best documented treatment modalities for AA is topical immunotherapy.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel method (multi-concentration patch test) versus standard protocol for topical immunotherapy.

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 patients with Alopecia areata, half of them received DPCP with a novel method using multi-concentration patch test to determine the optimal initiating concentration of DPCP (case group) and the other half experienced immunotherapy according to the standard protocol (control group). Percentage of hair regrowth after 6 months of treatment and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups. (IRCT registration code: IRCT20141209020250N5).

RESULTS

Absolute and relative hair regrowth percentages were reported 25% and 41.49% in case group and 8.2% and 14.21% in control group respectively. Considerable response (more than 75% hair regrowth) was observed in 4 (26.6%) patients in case and 1 (6.6%) patient in control group. The clinical response was initiated about 7 weeks sooner in case compared to the control group (14 versus 7.38 weeks, P: 0.001). Overall, clinical response was higher in patients received new protocol, compared to control group. Moreover, patients who experienced new protocol had a higher level of treatment satisfaction in comparison with patients having standard protocol (P: 0.012).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the effectiveness and safety of the novel multi-concentration patch test DPCP therapy for AA and its priority to conventional method, at least in terms of shortened duration of DPCP immunotherapy.

An integrated scalp and blood biomarker approach suggests the systemic nature of alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by immune dysregulation in both scalp and blood, but a large-scale approach establishing biomarkers of AA incorporating both scalp tissue and serum compartments is lacking. We aimed to characterize the transcriptomic signature of AA lesional and nonlesional scalp compared to healthy scalp and determine its relationship with the blood proteome in the same individuals, with comparative correlations to clinical AA disease severity.

METHODS

We evaluated lesional and nonlesional scalp tissues and serum from patients with moderate-to-severe AA (n = 18) and healthy individuals (n = 8). We assessed 33,118 genes in AA scalp tissue using RNAseq transcriptomic evaluation and 340 inflammatory proteins in serum using OLINK high-throughput proteomics. Univariate and multivariate approaches were used to correlate disease biomarkers with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT).

RESULTS

A total of 608 inflammatory genes were differentially expressed in lesional AA scalp (fold change/FCH>1.5, false discovery rate/FDR<0.05) including Th1 (IFNG/IL12B/CXCL11), Th2 (IL13/CCL18), and T-cell activation-related (ICOS) products. Th1/Th2-related markers were significantly correlated with AA clinical severity in lesional/nonlesional tissue, while keratins (KRT35/KRT83/KRT81) were significantly downregulated in lesional compared to healthy scalp (p < .05). Expression of cardiovascular/atherosclerosis-related markers (MMP9/CCL2/IL1RL1/IL33R/ST2/AGER) in lesional scalp correlated with their corresponding serum expression (p < .05). AA scalp demonstrated significantly greater biomarker dysregulation compared to blood. An integrated multivariate approach combining scalp and serum biomarkers improved correlations with disease severity/SALT.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes a unique understanding of the phenotype of moderate-to-severe AA with an integrated scalp and serum biomarker model suggesting the systemic nature of the disease, advocating for the need for immune-based systemic treatment.

Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor baricitinib in the treatment of adults with alopecia areata: Phase 2 results from a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

There are no treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration for alopecia areata.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss in a phase 2 study of adults with alopecia areata (BRAVE-AA1).

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg once daily. Two consecutive interim analyses were performed after all patients completed weeks 12 and 36 or had discontinued treatment prior to these time points. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 at week 36. Logistic regression was used with nonresponder imputation for missing data.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were randomized (placebo, 28; baricitinib 1-mg, 28; 2-mg, 27; 4-mg, 27). The baricitinib 1-mg dose was dropped after the first interim analysis based on lower SALT₃₀ response rate. At week 36, the proportion of patients achieving a SALT score of ≤20 was significantly greater in baricitinib 2-mg (33.3%, P = .016) and 4-mg (51.9%, P = .001) groups versus placebo (3.6%). Baricitinib was well tolerated with no new safety findings.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size limits generalizability of results.

CONCLUSION

These results support the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss.

Diagnostic implications of MicroRNAs; 155, 146 a, and 203 lesional expression in alopecia areata: A preliminary case-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune mediated disorder that attacks hair follicles with unknown pathophysiology. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA molecules, and their aberrant expression or function has been involved in different autoimmune conditions.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed at exploring the association between some miRNAs lesional expression and AA pathogenesis by measurement of miRNAs-155, 146a, and 203 expression levels in the lesional skin from patchy AA patients and to evaluate their relation with the studied parameters.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Skin expression levels of miRNAs-155, 146a, and 203 were evaluated in 50 patients with patchy AA and 25 healthy controls using reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The activity and severity of alopecia were assessed according to AA Investigational Assessment Guidelines criteria.

RESULTS

Studied patients showed significant up-regulation of miRNAs-203, 146a, and 155 lesional tissue expression levels when compared to control group (p < 0.05 each). Only miRNA-146a skin expression level was significantly higher in patients with multiple lesions (p < 0.001). However, patients with active AA had significantly higher tissue expression levels of the investigated miRNAs than those with inactive disease (P 0.001, 0.009, and 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Investigated miRNAs seem to be role players in AA pathogenesis and may be considered potential indicators of disease activity. However, more research is needed to clarify their accurate role and clinical importance.

Altered T cell subpopulations and serum anti-TYRP2 and tyrosinase antibodies in the acute and chronic phase of alopecia areata in the C3H/HeJ mouse model

BACKGROUND

C3H/HeJ mouse models progress gradually in hair loss from acute to chronic phase and reflect the symptoms of patients with alopecia areata (AA). However, the underlying pathological characteristics alteration associated with disease progression and autoantigens remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at elucidating the pathological differences between acute and chronic-AA in the C3H/HeJ mouse model.

METHODS

We analyzed populations of PBMCs, skin-draining lymph node (SDLN) cells, and cutaneous cells of AA mice using flow cytometry. The cytokine and chemokine expressions in the serum and skin were determined using multiplex assay and qPCR. The antibody serum levels were determined using ELISA and the antigen-specific T cells were detected using the MHC class I tetramer.

RESULTS

The CD8⁺NKG2D⁺ T and CD8⁺ T_EM cell percentage in the chronic-AA SDLNs or among the unaffected and acute-AA mice PBMCs increased. The Th1 and CD4⁺ T_EM cell percentage in the SDLNs and among PBMCs increased in the unaffected and AA mice. The percentage of CD8⁺ T_EM/T_RM cells and MHC class I expression increased in the lesions of acute-AA or the non-lesions and lesions of chronic-AA. The Th1 cells, dendritic cell-related cytokines, CD11c⁺ cells and MHC class II expression increased in the skin of AA mice. The antibody levels and TYRP2 and tyrosinase-specific CD8⁺ T cell percentages were upregulated in AA mice.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell subpopulations, cytokine and chemokine expressions differ between the disease phases. Moreover, TYRP2 and tyrosinase are potential autoreactive targets in the AA mouse model.

Is the severity of initial sensitization to diphenylcyclopropenone in alopecia areata patients predictive of the final clinical response?

Immunotherapy by diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is generally started with 2% DPCP sensitization, however in recent years studies have questioned the necessity of sensitization that may cause patients severe reactions and troubles at the onset of therapy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association between the severity of initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization in AA patients and clinical response. In this retrospective study, 110 AA patients who continued therapy for at least 6 months were enrolled. Hair loss and hair regrowth rates were calculated based on the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scoring system. Initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization after 2 weeks was graded as negative reaction (absence of any reaction), doubtful reaction (mild erythema, pruritus, and irritation for minutes after test), weak (erythema, mild edema, and scaling), and strong to extreme reaction (vesicles, bullae, ulcer, and discharge). The degrees of the initial reaction to 2% DPCP after 2 weeks were negative reaction 13 (11.81%), doubtful reaction 40 (36.36%), weak reaction 33 (30%), and strong to extreme reaction 24 (21.81%). Patients were divided into two groups: (A) patients with less than 12-month therapy (75 of 110), (B) patients with more than 12-month therapy (35 of 110). Initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization was not correlated with hair regrowth rate in either group (group A: Spearman's rho = 0.194, p = 0.095; group B: Spearman's rho = 0.063 p = 0.720). After 12-month treatment with DPCP, hair regrowth rate was significantly greater than 6-months therapy (group A: 17.03 ± 37.78, group B: 49.26 ± 36.34; p = 0.003). The severity of hair loss at the onset of treatment was significantly associated with the response rate in both groups (p-value <0.002). Based on our results, it is the initial severity of the disease and not the initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization that predicts the clinical response to DPCP immunotherapy.

Development of the alopecia areata scale for clinical use: Results of an academic-industry collaborative effort

BACKGROUND

The current classification for alopecia areata (AA) does not provide a consistent assessment of disease severity.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an AA severity scale based on expert experience.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was utilized. An advisory group of 22 AA clinical experts from the United States was formed to develop this AA scale. Representatives from the pharmaceutical industry provided feedback during its development.

RESULTS

Survey responses were used to draft severity criteria, aspiring to develop a simple scale that may be easily applied in clinical practice. A consensus vote was held to determine the final AA severity statement, with all AA experts agreeing to adopt the proposed scale.

LIMITATIONS

The scale is a static assessment intended to be used in clinical practice and not clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

The final AA disease severity scale, anchored in the extent of hair loss, captures key features commonly used by AA experts in clinical practice. This scale will better aid clinicians in appropriately assessing severity in patients with this common disease.

Oral Pulse Betamethasone, Methotrexate, and Combination Therapy to Treat Severe Alopecia Areata: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare oral betamethasone pulse therapy, methotrexate therapy and a combination of the two for patients with Alopecia Areata (AA) as an autoimmune disorder. In this study, 36 patients with severe AA were selected and classified into three groups of 12: 1- Oral betamethasone therapy (3 mg, once a week) with placebo; 2- Oral methotrexate (15 mg, once a week) with placebo; and 3- A combination of methotrexate (15 mg, once a week) and betamethasone (3 mg, once a week). The Severity Alopecia Tool (SALT) was used to measure improvements in the lesions through photographs, and the patients also rated their condition on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Assessments were performed, and the results were compared at baseline and then at intervals of three months for nine months. The demographics and SALT score were similar in the three groups (P > 0.05). All the groups showed improvements in SALT, VAS and photographic scores three months after beginning the treatment (P < 0.001). Betamethasone therapy (P = 0.006) and combination therapy (P < 0.001) provided greater SALT improvement than methotrexate, and combination therapy led to a greater improvement in VAS and photographic findings compared to the two other groups (P < 0.05). Oral steroid, methotrexate and combination pulse therapy were effective treatments for AA, while oral steroid pulse therapy and combination therapy were superior to methotrexate.

Alopecia Areata: an Update on Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common chronic tissue-specific autoimmune disease, resulting in hair loss, that affects up to 2% of the general population. The exact pathobiology of AA has still remained elusive, while the common theory is the collapse of the immune privilege of the hair follicle caused by immunological mechanism. Multiple genetic and environment factors contribute to the pathogenesis of AA. There are several clinical treatments for AA, varying from one or multiple well-defined patches to more diffuse or total hair loss of the scalp (alopecia totalis) or hair loss of the entire body (alopecia universalis). The available treatments for AA, such as corticosteroids and other immunomodulators, minoxidil, and contact immunotherapy, are of limited efficacy with a high risk of adverse effects and high recurrence rates, especially for patients with severe AA. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of AA have led to the development of new treatment strategies, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, biologics, and several small molecular agents. In addition, modern therapies for AA, including antihistamines, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, and other novel therapies have been well explored. In this review, we discussed the recent advances in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of AA.

Treatment outcome of oral tofacitinib and ruxolitinib in patients with alopecia areata: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tofacitinib and ruxolitinib have been used off-label to treat alopecia areata. Although a number of case reports and small studies have been published, there are no comprehensive reviews examining the outcomes of using tofacitinib and ruxolitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to examine the outcome of patients with alopecia areata treated with oral tofacitinib or ruxolitinib in previously published studies.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library was conducted. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed focusing on the Severity of Alopecia Tool 50 achievement rate, the frequency of adverse events and recurrence after discontinuation of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1244 studies were identified of which only 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the 346 patients in these 12 studies, 288 had received oral tofacitinib and 58 had received oral ruxolitinib. The overall Severity of Alopecia Tool50 achievement rate was 66% (95% confidence interval, 54%-76%). Subgroup analysis revealed that drug choice, mean age, sex ratio and alopecia areata subtype ratio did not significantly affect the treatment response. Infections and laboratory abnormalities were the most common adverse events (98 and 65 cases of 319 patients, respectively). Patients treated for more than six months had a greater frequency of laboratory abnormalities as compared to those treated for shorter durations (24% vs. 7%; P = 0.04). Recurrence of alopecia areata was observed within three months after discontinuation of treatment in the majority (74%) of patients.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis was limited by the small number of observational studies available for review, the heterogeneity of patient characteristics and the lack of long-term data.

CONCLUSION

Both oral tofacitinib and ruxolitinib are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of alopecia areata. Clinicians should be aware of the expected efficacy, adverse events and high recurrence rate of oral JAK inhibitors for alopecia areata to effectively counsel these patients before starting therapy.

A randomized trial of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) combined with anthralin versus DPCP alone for treating moderate to severe alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder. Finding the best treatment regimen for it remains a challenge. Currently, one of the best documented treatment modalities for AA is topical immunotherapy.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined DPCP and anthralin versus standard protocol (DPCP alone).

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients with Alopecia areata who received DPCP alone (group D) or in combination with anthralin (group D/A). Percentage of hair regrowth after 6 months of treatment and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Complete hair regrowth was observed among three patients in each group (18.75% in Group D and 15.79% in Group D/A) after 6 months. Moreover, 25% and 31% of patients in group D and 21% and 47% of patients in group D/A had > 75% and > 50% hair regrowth respectively at the end of the study (P-value: 0.696). In addition, earlier age of onset, chronicity of lesions, nail involvement, facial hair loss and extensive lesions at baseline were associated with poor clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

DPCP and anthralin was as effective as DPCP alone and anthralin did not add to the effect of DPCP in treating AA.

Evaluation of the level of serum Interleukins (IL-2, IL-4, IL-15 andIL-17) and its relationship with disease severity in patients with alopecia areata

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) is a hair disease that causes hair loss without scarring. The etiopathogenesis of AA has not been fully understood yet.

Objective

To determine serum interleukin levels (IL-2, IL-4, IL-15, and IL-17) in patients diagnosed with alopecia areata and to investigate the relationship of IL levels with the duration and severity of alopecia areata and the response to tofacitinib therapy.

Methods

Patients (≥16 years old) diagnosed with alopecia areata and healthy individuals as a control group was enrolled. Baseline serum interleukin levels of the patients and controls were measured. In the patient group receiving tofacitinib therapy, serum interleukin levels were measured again after 6 months. Disease severity for alopecia areata was assessed using the Severity of Alopecia Tool.

Results

Sixty-one AA patients and 30 healthy individuals were included; they were comparable regarding age and sex. The mean disease duration for AA was 7 ± 6 years and the baseline mean Severity of Alopecia Tool score was 71 ± 30 (range, 20–100). Baseline IL-2, IL-4 and IL-15 levels were significantly higher in the patient group than those in the control group (p < 0.001 for each). No significant correlation was found between the baseline interleukin levels and either disease duration or disease severity (baseline Severity of Alopecia Tool score). Among the patients receiving tofacitinib (n = 22), all interleukin levels significantly decreased after treatment. However, no significant relationship between the change in interleukin levels and the change in the Severity of Alopecia Tool scores was observed after tofacitinib treatment.

Study limitations

This is a monocentric study conducted in a single university hospital.

Conclusion

High interleukin levels in alopecia areata patients and the significant decrease with treatment support the idea that interleukins have a role in pathogenesis. Nevertheless, no relationship could be demonstrated between IL levels and disease duration or severity.

Adiponectin as a novel biomarker of disease severity in alopecia areata

The frequent coexistence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients with alopecia areata may indicate the common pathogenetic pathway in these conditions with an important role of adipokines. The aim of the study was to evaluate the serum level of adiponectin, resistin and leptin in patients with alopecia areata in comparison to healthy controls. The study included 65 patients with alopecia areata and 71 healthy controls. The concentration of adipokines was determined with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The mean concentrations of adiponectin and resistin were significantly lower in the sera of patients with alopecia areata when compared to healthy controls (7966 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document}± 4087 vs 9947 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document}± 5692 ng/ml; p = 0.0312 and 11.04 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document}± 3.88 vs 14.11 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document}± 8.69 ng/ml; p = 0.0176, respectively). A negative correlation between the serum level of adiponectin and severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score was observed (r = − 0.26; p < 0.05). The concentration of adiponectin was significantly lower in patients with alopecia universalis than in patients with patchy alopecia areata (4951 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document}± 2499 vs 8525 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document}± 4085 ng/ml; p = 0.0135). No significant difference in the serum concentration of leptin was observed between patients with alopecia areata and healthy controls. The negative correlation between the serum level of adiponectin and hair loss severity indicates that adiponectin may be considered a marker of hair loss severity in alopecia areata. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of resistin in patients with alopecia areata and its decreased level irregardless of severity or activity of the disease.

Superficial cryotherapy using dimethyl ether and propane mixture versus microneedling in the treatment of alopecia areata: A prospective single-blinded randomized clinical trial

To verify and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of superficial cryotherapy using dimethyl ether and propane (DMEP) mixture vs. microneedling in the treatment of mild scalp alopecia areata (AA). In a prospective randomized single-blinded clinical trial, 80 patients with clinically evident scalp mild AA were randomly assigned into two groups of 40 patients each. Group (1) was treated by superficial cryotherapy using DMEP in three freeze-thaw cycles of 5 s each. Group (2) was treated by microneedling. Both groups were treated every 2 weeks for 6 sessions and followed up for 3 months after the last session. Patients were assessed by photographic documentation, trichoscopic evaluation, severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score, and alopecia areata symptom impact scale (AASIS). An excellent response was achieved in 15 (37.5%) of group (1) compared with 14 (35%) of group (2) patients, while a good response was achieved in 23 (57.5%) of group (1) compared with 21 (52.5%) of group (1) patients, with a statistically insignificant difference. The mean SALT score change percentage was a statistically significantly higher in group (2) patients. The mean AASIS change percentage was higher in group (1) patients, but this was a statistically insignificant. In both groups, the mean numbers of trichoscopic signs of AA significantly decreased from baseline to the end of follow-up period. Both therapeutic modalities were well-tolerated, with no recurrence after the follow-up period. Both superficial cryotherapy using DMEP mixture, and microneedling are simple, effective, and safe therapeutic options for mild scalp AA, however, microneedling showed higher efficacy.

Alopecia areata severity index (AASI): A reliable scoring system to assess the severity of alopecia areata on face and scalp-a pilot study

BACKGROUND

All scoring systems used in Alopecia Areata (AA) focus mainly on scalp and cannot assess the severity or treatment response when AA involves the beard hair, eyebrows, or eyelashes.

AIM

This study describes and assesses the reliability of a new scoring system "Alopecia Areata Severity Index" (AASI) for measuring the severity of AA of scalp, beard, and upper face.

METHODS

Scalp hair, beard hair, upper face (eyebrows and eyelashes) were individually assessed and the severity of AA was scored from 0 to 100 (0-50 in case of upper face). AASI score was then calculated as a sum of all these individual scores as AASI = AASI (scalp) + AASI (upper face) + AASI (beard)+. To test the inter-observer reliability of AASI score, 25 patients with varying severity of AA were scored by 4 trained dermatologists. Repeat scoring was performed after one week to test for intra-observer reliability.

RESULTS

Excellent inter-rater, as well as intra-observer reliability, was observed with Chronbach's alpha value of 0.999 (CI = 0.989-1.000). The intra-observer correlation coefficient with average measure was 0.999 (CI = 0.990-1.000) with statistically significant F test <0.005.

CONCLUSION

AASI score is a reliable scoring system to assess the severity of AA in patients with involvement of one or more areas of the body.

LIMITATIONS

Sample population belonged to single ethnic group.

Evaluation of HLA class I and HLA class II allele profile and its relationship with clinical features in patients with alopecia areata: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease where autoimmune dysregulations along with genetic susceptibility are hypothesized to play a role in pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study in to evaluate HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRB1 profile and its relationship with clinical features in AA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with AA and 100 healthy controls were included in the study. HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRB1 frequencies were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primers (PCR-SSP).

RESULTS

HLA-B*39 and HLA-HLA-DRB1*15 allele frequencies were increased (p = .022 and p = .023, respectively), HLA-A*11 and HLA-B*35 frequencies were decreased (p = .006 and p = .014, respectively) in AA patients. HLA-B*13 and HLA-DRB1*11 were associated with poor prognostic factors. A class I allele, HLA-B*13 was associated with recurrence (p = .023) and presence of nevus flammeus (p = .022), while the class II allele HLA-DRB1*11 was associated with widespread hair loss (diffuse or universal alopecia) (p = .026), presence of ophiasis (p = .049) and juvenile onset (p = .018).

CONCLUSION

Belonging to two different classes of HLA family, HLA-B*13 and HLA-DRB1*11 alleles identified separate set of risk factors. In addition to increasing the risk of AA, HLA alleles may affect the prognosis of the disease.

Guidelines for clinical trials of frontal fibrosing alopecia: consensus recommendations from the International FFA Cooperative Group (IFFACG)

BACKGROUND

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has become one of the most common causes of cicatricial alopecia worldwide. However, there is a lack of clear aetiology and robust clinical trial evidence for the efficacy and safety of agents currently used for treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To enable data to be collected worldwide on FFA using common criteria and assessment methods.

METHODS

A multicentre, international group of experts in hair loss was convened by email to create consensus recommendations for clinical trials. Consensus was defined at > 90% agreement on each recommended part of these guidelines.

RESULTS

Standardized diagnostic criteria, severity rating, staging, and investigator and patient assessment of scalp hair loss and other clinical features of FFA were created.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines should allow the collection of reliable aggregate data on FFA and advance efforts in both clinical and basic research to close knowledge gaps in this condition.

Clinical and trichoscopic features in various forms of scalp psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Scalp psoriasis is often undiagnosed or inadequately treated. The patient himself underestimates the seriousness of this hair disease and consults too late to a dermatologist.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to create a correlation between the clinical patterns and trichoscopy of scalp psoriasis such in a way to help the clinician to make the diagnosis and select the appropriate therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We gathered all patients affected of scalp psoriasis afferent to Outpatient's hair consultation of the Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, from January 2012 to December 2018. All patients were evaluated through clinical, trichoscopic examination and a skin biopsy only in doubtful cases. We quantified the severity of the disease with several objective and subjective parameters every 4 months, up to 1 year. We recorded therapies, outcome data and quality of life.

RESULTS

We collected 156 patients affected by scalp psoriasis, identifying seven clinical patterns with specific trichoscopical correlation. In the order of frequency, the clinical patterns were as follows: plaque psoriasis (with a prevalence of erythema, silver-white scales and twisted red loops vessels and red dots); thin scales (with silvery-white scales, simple red lines and signet red ring vessels); sebopsoriasis (with greasy scales, erythema with red dots, globules and twisted and bushy red loops at high magnification); psoriatic cap (with silver-white scales, erythema and polymorphic vascular pattern); pityriasis amiantacea (with yellowish adherent scales, erythema and simple red loops capillaries); cicatricial psoriatic alopecia (with erythema associated with yellowish, silver-white scales with twisted and bushy red loops capillaries) and pustular psoriasis (with 'flower shape' pustular lesions, erythema simple red loops capillaries).

CONCLUSIONS

The description of different clinical patterns of scalp psoriasis and its trichoscopical correlations may help the clinician to make the diagnosis also in atypical presentations and to prescribe an adequate therapeutic regimen.

Scalp and serum profiling of frontal fibrosing alopecia reveals scalp immune and fibrosis dysregulation with no systemic involvement

BACKGROUND

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a progressive, scarring alopecia of the frontotemporal scalp that poses a substantial burden on quality of life. Large-scale global profiling of FFA is lacking, preventing the development of effective therapeutics.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize FFA compared to normal and alopecia areata using broad molecular profiling and to identify biomarkers linked to disease severity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed 33,118 genes in scalp using RNA sequencing and 350 proteins in serum using OLINK high-throughput proteomics. Disease biomarkers were also correlated with clinical severity and a fibrosis gene set.

RESULTS

Genes differentially expressed in lesional FFA included markers related to Th1 (IFNγ/CXCL9/CXCL10), T-cell activation (CD2/CD3/CCL19/ICOS), fibrosis (CXCR3/FGF14/FGF22/VIM/FN1), T-regulatory (FOXP3/TGFB1/TGFB3), and Janus kinase/JAK (JAK3/STAT1/STAT4) (Fold changes [FCH]>1.5, FDR<.05 for all). Only one protein, ADM, was differentially expressed in FFA serum compared to normal (FCH>1.3, FDR<.05). Significant correlations were found between scalp biomarkers (IL-36RN/IL-25) and FFA severity, as well as between JAK/STAT and fibrosis gene-sets (r>.6; P <.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by a small sample size and predominantly female FFA patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data characterize FFA as an inflammatory condition limited to scalp, involving Th1/JAK skewing, with associated fibrosis and elevated T-regulatory markers, suggesting the potential for disease reversibility with JAK/STAT inhibition.

IFN-α and TNF-α serum levels and their association with disease severity in Egyptian children and adults with alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune skin disease characterized by abnormal levels of several cytokines, such as interferon alpha (IFN-α) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which are T-helper type 1 cytokines that have important roles in the pathogenesis of AA. The aim of our study was to correlate circulating IFN-α and TNF-α levels with disease severity, activity, and clinical type in patients with AA and to evaluate the relationship between the two cytokines.

METHODS

We investigated serum IFN-α and TNF-α levels in 72 patients with AA (35 children and 35 adults) and 75 healthy control individuals (34 children and 41 adults) using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. We evaluated AA severity using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) and determined the activity based on dermoscopic criteria of disease activity.

RESULTS

Serum IFN-α and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the patients than in the controls. There was a significant positive correlation between serum IFN-α and TNF-α levels in all patients with alopecia areata, as well as between serum TNF-α levels and disease severity in all patients and in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the association between IFN-α and TNF-α levels and AA and suggest that TNF-α might be related to disease severity.

Sublingual tofacitinib for alopecia areata: a roll-over pilot clinical trial and analysis of pharmacokinetics

Tofacitinib is a JAK1/3 inhibitor used off-label to treat alopecia areata (AA). Oral tofacitinib undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism and has numerous drug interactions and a half-life of 3 hours necessitating twice daily dosing. Sublingual delivery bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism, which may provide pharmacokinetic benefits and reduce gastrointestinal side effects. We investigate sublingual tofacitinib as a novel form of administration in a cohort of treatment-resistant patients. The objective of this work is to assess the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of sublingual tofacitinib in moderate-to-severe AA patients. An open-label, roll-over pilot clinical trial was conducted. Participants were recruited from a preceding trial. All responders (≥50% reduction in Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score, SALT50) in the preceding trial continued on the same treatment (cyclosporine/placebo), whereas nonresponders rolled over to receive open-label sublingual tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Treatment response as reduction in SALT score after 12 weeks (low: 15-29%, medium: 30-49%, good: 50-75%, and high grade: 75-100%) was measured. Pharmacokinetics was analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Eighteen participants completed the trial. Total treatment response to tofacitinib was 37.5%. SALT50 was achieved in 12.5%. The mean improvement in SALT score was 15.57%. Mean maximum plasma concentration was 43.18 ng/ml occurring after 1 hour. Elimination half-life is estimated to be up to 11 hours. An estimated half-life of up to 11 hours may be achieved with sublingual tofacitinib, which is significantly longer than the oral form and may facilitate daily dosing. Larger clinical trials are required to further characterize its pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

New Diagnostic Tools to Evaluate Hair Loss

The precise and reliable diagnosis of hair loss disorders is essential for developing a successful management plan. It is, thus, the responsibility of the dermatologist to select the appropriate diagnostic tools to effectively evaluate patients presenting with hair loss concerns. Fortunately, there is a growing body of noninvasive and invasive diagnostic resources, each with advantages and disadvantages. For the practicing dermatologist, tactile assessments and direct visualization are enhanced with scoring instruments, questionnaires, handheld trichoscopy, and scalp biopsy. For research and clinical study purposes, the more precise, high-resolution tools such as videodermoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and phototrichograms, may be useful.

Psychiatric basics of alopecia areata in pediatric patients: Evaluation of emotion dysregulation, somatization, depression, and anxiety levels

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Alopecia areata (AA) is a skin disease characterized by sudden-onset hair loss. The relationship between psychiatric status and AA has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate emotion dysregulation, somatization, depression, and anxiety levels in children and adolescents with AA.

METHODS

The study included 27 patients aged 8-18 years diagnosed with AA, and an age and gender-matched control group consisting of 30 cases without a known chronic medical disease. All individuals were screened for existing psychiatric illnesses by a pediatric psychiatrist through the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). The patients were then evaluated using the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C), and Children Somatization Inventory (CSI-24). In addition, the patients' parents were asked to complete the Emotion Regulation Checklist-Family Form (ERC).

RESULTS

When comparing the scale scores of the AA and control group, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the Emotional Lability/Negativity subscale scores on ERC. K-SADSPL ratios denoted features of at least one psychiatric condition in 62.9% and 16.6% of the AA group and control group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the importance of psychiatric evaluation in patients with AA. Our study also reveals the need for further studies with a larger sample of AA patients being evaluated in terms of emotion regulation.

Dermatologist and Patient Perceptions of Treatment Success in Alopecia Areata and Evaluation of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Japan

INTRODUCTION

The content validity and treatment success thresholds of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for alopecia areata (AA)-including the Alopecia Areata-Investigator Global Assessment™ (AA-IGA™), Scalp Hair Assessment Patient-Reported Outcome™ (PRO), and clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) and PRO measures for eyebrows, eyelashes, eye irritation, and nails-were established in interviews with dermatologists and patients in North America. This study aimed to confirm the content validity and treatment success thresholds of these measures with clinicians and patients in Japan.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted in Japan with dermatologists with AA expertise and adults with AA who experienced ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. Interviews included concept elicitation and cognitive interview questions. Data were analyzed using thematic and framework techniques.

RESULTS

Seven dermatologists and 15 patients participated. Scalp hair loss was the most important sign/symptom of AA and the greatest treatment priority. Dermatologists and patients understood the AA-IGA™, Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™, and other COAs, and found these measures to be appropriate, relevant, and clinically meaningful. Dermatologists and patients confirmed that achieving ≤ 20% scalp hair loss (AA-IGA™/Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™ categories 0 or 1) indicated treatment success for patients with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. Categories 0 or 1 on the other COAs represented treatment success.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the content validity and treatment success thresholds of the AA-IGA™, Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™, and other ClinRO and PRO measures for AA in Japan. These findings were aligned with interview results in North America and support the use of these measures in AA treatment studies.