Modeling the role of mid-wavelength cones in circadian responses to light

Brain responses to violet, blue, and green monochromatic light exposures in humans: prominent role of blue light and the brainstem

Background

Relatively long duration retinal light exposure elicits nonvisual responses in humans, including modulation of alertness and cognition. These responses are thought to be mediated in part by melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells which are more sensitive to blue light than violet or green light. The contribution of the melanopsin system and the brain mechanisms involved in the establishment of such responses to light remain to be established.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We exposed 15 participants to short duration (50 s) monochromatic violet (430 nm), blue (473 nm), and green (527 nm) light exposures of equal photon flux (10¹³ph/cm²/s) while they were performing a working memory task in fMRI. At light onset, blue light, as compared to green light, increased activity in the left hippocampus, left thalamus, and right amygdala. During the task, blue light, as compared to violet light, increased activity in the left middle frontal gyrus, left thalamus and a bilateral area of the brainstem consistent with activation of the locus coeruleus.

Conclusion/Significance

These results support a prominent contribution of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells to brain responses to light within the very first seconds of an exposure. The results also demonstrate the implication of the brainstem in mediating these responses in humans and speak for a broad involvement of light in the regulation of brain function.

Responses of suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons to light and dark adaptation: relative contributions of melanopsin and rod-cone inputs

The circadian oscillator in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is entrained to the environmental light/dark cycle through photic information conveyed from the retina. The vast majority of projections to the SCN arise from melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells that are intrinsically light sensitive and that receive inputs from both rods and cones. To investigate the relative contributions of the different photoreceptive systems in shaping the photic signal influencing the circadian clock, we analyzed neuronal responses of single SCN neurons using extracellular electrophysiological recordings under different conditions of light adaptation. In the majority of neurons (78%), the spike rate is increased by light stimulation whereas the remainder are light-inhibited. The neuronal response to light is composed of several components distinguished by their temporal dynamics and degree of alteration after previous light exposure. SCN neurons display a sustained response to light followed by persistence of the response after light offset. These responses are sluggish and relatively unaffected by previous light exposures. Neurons also respond with a brisk, excitatory ON response and often an OFF response that is either excitatory or inhibitory. ON-OFF responses are transient and strongly reduced by previous bright white light exposure. Furthermore, two types of neuronal response patterns can be distinguished by the presence or absence of a slow-transient component that follows the transient ON response. The transient ON-OFF components express light adaptation properties characteristic of retinal channels involving cones, whereas the sustained and persistent components are consistent with in vitro response properties reported for melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells.

Synaptic influences on rat ganglion-cell photoreceptors

The intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) provide a conduit through which rods and cones can access brain circuits mediating circadian entrainment, pupillary constriction and other non-image-forming visual functions. We characterized synaptic inputs to ipRGCs in rats using whole-cell and multielectrode array recording techniques. In constant darkness all ipRGCs received spontaneous excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. Light stimulation evoked in all ipRGCs both synaptically driven ('extrinsic') and autonomous melanopsin-based ('intrinsic') responses. The extrinsic light responses were depolarizing, about 5 log units more sensitive than the intrinsic light response, and transient near threshold but sustained to brighter light. Pharmacological data showed that ON bipolar cells and amacrine cells make the most prominent direct contributions to these extrinsic light responses, whereas OFF bipolar cells make a very weak contribution. The spatial extent of the synaptically driven light responses was comparable to that of the intrinsic photoresponse, suggesting that synaptic contacts are made onto the entire dendritic field of the ipRGCs. These synaptic influences increase the sensitivity of ipRGCs to light, and also extend their temporal bandpass to higher frequencies. These extrinsic ipRGC light responses can explain some of the previously reported properties of circadian photoentrainment and other non-image-forming visual behaviours.

Multiple photopigments entrain the Mammalian circadian oscillator

Circadian rhythms are entrained to the natural day:night cycle. Melanopsin expressed in retinal ganglion cells partially accounts for circadian photoentrainment. Dkhissi-Benyahya et al. demonstrate that medium wavelength opsin (MW-opsin) also plays an important role in the process. Furthermore, they develop a model explaining wavelength-dependent photoentrainment by melanopsin and MW-opsin.

Circadian photoreception in vertebrates

To be adaptively useful, internal circadian clocks must be entrained (synchronized) to daily rhythms in the external world. The entraining process adjusts the period of the internal clock to 24 hours and its phase to a value that determines the organism's temporal niche (e.g., diurnal and nocturnal). For most vertebrates, the dominant environmental synchronizer is light. All vertebrates employ specialized photoreceptor cells to perceive synchronizing light signals, but mammals and nonmammalian vertebrates do this differently. Mammals concentrate circadian photoreceptors in the retina, employing rods, cones, and a subset of retinal ganglion cells that are directly photosensitive and contain an unusual photopigment (melanopsin). Nonmammalian vertebrates use photoreceptors located deep in the brain and in the pineal gland as well as others in the retina. Such photoreceptor extravagance is difficult to explain. It seems likely that the different photoreceptor classes in this elaborate sensory system may have specialized roles in entrainment. There is some evidence that this is in fact the case. Furthermore, this nonvisual "circadian" photoreceptive system also controls acute behavioral responses to light (masking), pupillary constriction, and photoperiodic regulation of reproductive state. We review some of the early work on birds and describe new findings that indicate specific roles for retinal rods, cones, and photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in mammals.

Multiple photoreceptors contribute to nonimage-forming visual functions predominantly through melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells

In the absence of functional rod and cone photoreceptors, mammals retain the ability to detect light for a variety of physiological functions such as circadian photoentrainment and pupillary light reflex. This is attributed to a third class of photoreceptors, the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells that express the photopigment melanopsin. Even though in the absence of rods and cones, mammals retain the ability to detect light for various nonimage-forming visual functions, rods and cones can compensate for the absence of the melanopsin protein in nonvisual light-dependent physiological behaviors. Several studies have addressed the relative contribution of each photoreceptor type to nonimage-forming visual functions; however, a comprehensive model for these interactions is far from complete. Under conditions where melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells were genetically ablated, image formation is maintained, whereas circadian photoentrainment and pupillary light reflex are severely impaired. The findings indicate that multiple photoreceptors contribute to nonimage-forming visual functions through signaling via melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells. Future studies will aim to determine more quantitatively the relative contributions of each retinal photoreceptor in signaling light for nonimage-forming visual functions.