Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation

Clinical outcomes in pediatric patients implanted with Thoratec ventricular assist device

Most mechanical circulatory support devices are designed for adult patients; however, some can be successfully applied to pediatric patients. The rates of complications and patient survival to transplant or native heart recovery after implantation of the Thoratec ventricular assist device (VAD) (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) in children and adolescents were determined from the company's voluntary registry. As of January 2005, 209 patients (mean age 14.5 years; range 5 to 18 years) have been supported with the Thoratec VAD. Mean patient weight was 57 kg (range, 17 to 118 kg), and patients had a mean body surface area of 1.6 m2 (range, 0.73 to 2.3 m2). The major etiologies necessitating VAD support included cardiomyopathy (55.0%), acute myocarditis (25.4%), and end-stage congenital heart disease (5.8%). Mean duration of VAD support was 44 days (range, 0 to 434 days). Patient survival to transplantation or native heart recovery was 68.4%. Patients with cardiomyopathy and acute myocarditis had 74.1% and 86.0% survival, respectively, with only 27.3% survival in patients having congenital heart disease. The overall survival rate in smaller children (body surface area, <1.3 m2) was similar at 51.7%, although the incidence of congenital heart disease was higher.

Biventricular assist device utilization for patients with morbid congestive heart failure: a justifiable strategy

BACKGROUND

The rationale for the use of a biventricular assist device (BiVAD) for morbid congestive heart failure (MCHF) has been questioned because of historically unacceptable rates of postimplant and post-transplant mortality as well as perceived barriers to their outpatient management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients who received a Thoratec BiVAD from January 1990 to December 2003 at the University of Pittsburgh were studied retrospectively. There were a total of 73 patients (32% ischemic, 21% idiopathic, and 47% other) who had a BiVAD implanted. Before implantation, 100% were on > or =1 inotropic agent, and 77% had an intra-aortic balloon pump. Overall survival was 69%; 42 patients (84%) received cardiac transplantation, 5 patients (10%) were weaned, and 3 (6%) remained supported on BiVAD. If the 14 patients with postcardiotomy failure and acute myocardial infarction with shock are excluded, the overall survival improves to 75%. Five-year actuarial survival after heart transplantation was 58%. Of the 29 patients implanted before 2000, the 4-month actuarial freedom from driveline infections, bloodstream infections, and neurological events was 10%, 54%, and 48%, respectively, whereas the rates of these events for the 44 patients implanted after 2000 improved to 70%, 79%, and 80%, respectively. Since 2000, 21 (48%) patients were discharged from the hospital, of whom 38% went to an outpatient residence, 33% to a skilled nursing facility, and 29% to home. Once discharged, > or =1 readmission occurred in 45% and > or =2 readmissions in 48%.

CONCLUSIONS

BiVAD support for MCHF has an acceptable overall mortality and survival to transplantation. Morbidity has been significantly reduced in the past 4 years, and management as an outpatient is achievable.

Duration of inotropic support after left ventricular assist device implantation: Risk factors and impact on outcome

OBJECTIVES

Because duration of inotropic support after left ventricular assist device implantation has been recognized as a surrogate for right ventricular dysfunction, we sought to (1) identify its preimplantation risk factors, particularly its association with preimplantation right ventricular dysfunction, and (2) assess its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2002, left ventricular assist devices were implanted in 207 patients, exclusive of those receiving preoperative mechanical circulatory support, which precluded measuring right ventricular stroke work. Duration of inotropic support was analyzed as a continuous variable, truncated by death or transplantation, and in turn as a risk factor for these 2 events.

RESULTS

Inotropic support decreased from 100% on the day of implantation to 57%, 33%, and 22% by days 7, 14, and 21. Its duration was strongly associated with lower preimplantation right ventricular stroke work index, older age, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and was associated (P < .04) with higher mortality before transplantation but not with transition to transplantation. We identified no preimplantation risk factors for right ventricular assist device use because of its relatively infrequent use in this population (18 patients, only 4 of whom survived to transplantation).

CONCLUSION

Duration of inotropic support after left ventricular assist device insertion is strongly correlated with low preimplantation right ventricular stroke work index. In turn, it was associated with reduced survival to transplantation. Thus, right ventricular stroke work measured before implantation might be useful in decision making for biventricular support, destination therapy, or total artificial heart.

Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: the need for an implantable right ventricular assist device

Right ventricular failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device is an unremitting problem. Consideration of portal circulation is important for reversing liver dysfunction and preventing multiple organ failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. To achieve these objectives, it is imperative to maintain the central venous pressure as low as possible. A more positive application of right ventricular assistance is recommended. Implantable pulsatile left ventricular assist devices cannot be used as a right ventricular assist device because of their structure and device size. To improve future prospects, it is necessary to develop an implantable right ventricular assist device based on a rotary blood pump.

Managing the Post-Left Ventricular Assist Device Patient

The implantation of ventricular assist devices allows the opportunity for patients with intractable heart failure to have improved quality and quantity of life. The devices may be implanted after failed attempts to wean from bypass, as a bridge to transplantation, or as destination therapy. Key issues following the implantation of assist devices include the prevention of right ventricular failure, appropriate pharmacologic management, prevention and management of infection, and detection and treatment of device dysfunction.

Le phéochromocytome comme cause inhabituelle de choc cardiogénique

The authors reported a case involving a young patient with a cardiogenic shock associated to an acute pulmonary oedema. According to the seriousness of the shock, an external ventricular assist device (VAD) was initially inserted and replaced thereafter because of the cardiovascular instability, by an external pneumatic biventricular assist device. A cardiogenic shock induced by an acute adrenergic myocarditis due to a phaeochromocytoma was diagnosed. The patient was weaned from the VAD on day 84 and was scheduled for elective surgery of the phaeochromocytoma on day 93. The authors discussed the time of the surgery according to the anticoagulation therapy necessary to the VAD and the necessary caution taken if a cardiogenic shock appeared around surgery.

Pulsatile Paracorporeal Assist Devices in Children and Adolescents with Biventricular Failure

Children with heart failure unresponsive to medical therapy are left with few options for survival. Pulsatile paracorporeal ventricular assist devices are life-saving options for such patients, allowing for bridge to transplantation or cardiac recovery. From March 1997 to July 2004, 12 patients underwent implantation of Thoratec biventricular assist devices (BVADs) for refractory heart failure. Mean age was 14.9 (range 7-20) and mean BSA was 1.7 (range 1.1-1.9). Indications for support included end-stage cardiomyopathy (n=10), myocarditis (n=1), and postcardiotomy heart failure (n=1). Preimplant variables included 50% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation (mean 4.2 days), hyperbilirubinemia in 58%, and acute renal failure in 50%. Mean duration of support was 64.5 (range 2-175) days. Overall survival was 83%, with nine patients successfully bridged to transplantation (75%). One patient exhibited recovery allowing for device explantation, and two patients died while on BVADs. Complications included bleeding requiring reoperation in 25% (n=3), stroke in 8% (n=1), driveline infections in 17% (n=2), and device malfunction in one patient. Pulsatile paracorporeal BVADs can be used successfully in children and adolescents with heart failure. These results warrant consideration of using available miniaturized technology in the United States for the support of smaller children with intractable biventricular failure.

Development of implantable right ventricular assist device

Implantable ventricular assist devices (VADs) are indicated for long waiting periods before transplantation and also as a destination therapy. Meanwhile, right ventricular failure (RVF) is one of the four major complications observed in patients after left VAD (LVAD) implantation, with an incidence of approximately 20%. Preoperative prediction of the complication remains difficult, and the mortality is very high. To date, no implantable right VAD (RVAD) is available for the clinical situation. The possibility of realizing an implantable RVAD with Gyro centrifugal pump (PI-710 pump) was investigated. Eleven chronic animal experiments with LVAD and RVAD implantation were performed. Right heart bypass was established between right outflow and pulmonary trunk, and the pump was implanted in the preperitoneal space. The anatomic fit was good. The mean term of the experiments was 59 days, with excellent pump performance. Stable pulmonary hemodynamics and respiratory function were maintained during all of the experimental terms. No specific abnormal histologic findings of the lung were confirmed; however, tunica media hypertrophy was recognized in some cases. The PI-710 pump is feasible as a clinically implantable RVAD, but further study of histologic and pulmonary vascular changes after RVAD implantation is needed.

Current status of the gyro centrifugal blood pump--development of the permanently implantable centrifugal blood pump as a biventricular assist device (NEDO project)

The New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) project was started in 1995. The goal is the development of a multipurpose, totally implantable biventricular assist device (BVAD) that can be used for any patient who suffers from severe heart failure. Our C1E3 (two-week pump) centrifugal pump, called the Gyro pump, has three design characteristics: a magnetic coupling and double pivot bearing system, an eccentric inlet port, and secondary vanes on the bottom of the impeller. The pump was miniaturized. The C1E3 evolved into the NEDO PI-601, a totally implantable centrifugal pump for BVAD. The current NEDO PI-710 pump (five-year pump) system includes a centrifugal pump with pivot bearings, a hydraulically-levitated impeller, an rpm-controlled miniaturized actuator (all-in-one actuator plus controller), an emergency clamp on the left outflow, and a Frank-Starling-type flow control. The final mass production model is now finalized, and the final animal study and two-year endurance studies are ongoing.

Biventricular Support With the Jarvik 2000 Ventricular Assist Device in a Calf Model of Pulmonary Hypertension

The Jarvik 2000 ventricular assist device (VAD) is clinically efficacious for treating end-stage left ventricular failure. Because simultaneous right ventricular support is also occasionally necessary, we developed a biventricular Jarvik 2000 technique and tested it in a calf model. One VAD was implanted in the left ventricle with outflow-graft anastomosis to the descending aorta. The other VAD was implanted in the right ventricle with outflow-graft anastomosis to the pulmonary artery. Throughout the 30 day study, hemodynamic values were continuously monitored. On day 30, both pumps were evaluated at different speeds, under various hemodynamic conditions. By gradually occluding the pulmonary artery proximally or distally, we simulated varying degrees of high pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular hypertension, global heart failure, or ventricular fibrillation. The two VADs maintained biventricular support even during pulmonary artery occlusion and ventricular fibrillation, yielding a cardiac output of 3-11 L/min, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 11-24 mm Hg, and central venous pressure of 9-25 mm Hg. End-organ function was unimpaired, and no major adverse events occurred. The dual VADs offered safe, effective biventricular assistance in the calf. Additional studies are needed to assess the effects of lowered pulse pressure upon the pulmonary circulation and to develop a single pump speed controller.

Thoratec ventricular assist devices in children with less than 1.3 m2 of body surface area

This report summarizes the multicenter experience with the Thoratec paracorporeal pneumatic ventricular assist device (VAD) (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA) in small children. Between October 1988 and August 2001, 19 children (11 male, 8 female) with less than 1.3 (mean 1.09, range 0.73-1.29) m2 body surface area (BSA) have been supported with univentricular (9) or biventricular (10) Thoratec VADs in 12 centers in the United States and Germany. Mean patient age was 10 (range 7-14) years, mean weight 31 (range 17-41) kg. Indications for support were end-stage cardiomyopathy in eight patients, myocarditis in three, end-stage congenital heart disease in seven, and transplant graft failure in one patient. Mean duration of support was 43 (range 0-120) days. In patients with cardiomyopathies and myocarditis, survival through discharge occurred in 8 of 11 (72%) patients; however, only 1 of 7 patients with congenital disease survived. Outcome appeared independent of patient size. Neurologic complications were significant and predominant in the congenital disease group. Our experience suggests that the Thoratec VAD can be successfully used in these difficult patients, particularly in children with cardiomyopathies and myocarditis. Congenital disease is associated with increased risk. To reduce thromboembolic risk, we recommend left ventricular as opposed to left atrial inflow cannulation and higher device rates with partial stroke volumes.

Role of the Abiomed BVS 5000 Device for Short-Term Support and Bridge to Transplantation

Over the last 10 years, we have gained experience implanting the Abiomed BVS 5000 (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA) device for short-term mechanical support. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with this device. From April 1993 through January 2003, 71 patients underwent implantation of an Abiomed BVS 5000 device. This included 19 left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), 30 right ventricular assist devices (RVADs), and 22 biventricular assist devices (BIVADs). Demographics of device recipients, conditions for mechanical support, and outcome were evaluated for each device type. Devices were inserted for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 53 (74.6%) patients and precardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 18 (25.4%) patients. Mean duration of support was 4.9+/-4.1 days, with 64 (90.1 %) patients supported for fewer than 10 days. Twenty-nine (40.8%) patients were successfully weaned from support after myocardial recovery: 7 (36.8%) LVADs, 13 (43.3%) RVADs, and 9 (40.9%) BIVADs. Eight (11.3%) patients received devices as a "bridge to bridge," undergoing implantation of a long-term HeartMate LVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA): six (31.6%) LVADs and two (9.1 %) BIVADs. Seven (9.9%) Abiomed patients were successfully bridged to transplantation: two (10.5%) LVADs, two (6.7%) RVADs, and three (13.6%) BIVADs. Overall, 44 (62.0%) patients survived support: weaned, "bridged to bridge," or transplanted. The Abiomed BVS 5000 can be used effectively for short-term stabilization and for bridging to transplant in select patients.

Bridging to transplant with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: The Columbia Presbyterian 12-year experience

OBJECTIVE

Implantation of a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation has become an acceptable approach for patients with end-stage heart failure. Our long-term results with 3 Thoratec HeartMate devices are presented to outline improvements in successful bridging to transplantation and post-transplant survival.

METHODS

From August 1990 through January 2003, 243 patients underwent implantation of Thoratec HeartMate devices as a bridge to transplantation. This included 52 (21.4%) pneumatic devices, 17 (7.0%) dual-lead vented electric devices, and 174 (71.6%) single-lead vented electric devices.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49.7 +/- 13.7 years. Mean support time was 78.1 +/- 82.9 days (0-541). Bridging success increased from 63.5% (n = 33) for pneumatic devices to 64.7% (n = 11) for dual-lead vented electric devices and 72.4% (n = 126) for single-lead vented electric devices (P =.005). Posttransplant 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival increased from 87.5%, 78.1%, and 71.9% in patients with pneumatic devices to 91.5%, 86.9%, and 81.3%, respectively, for patients with single-lead vented electric devices. Device infection and malfunction occurred in 17.7% (n = 43) and 12.8% (n = 31) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful bridging to transplantation and posttransplant survival has improved over time. Left ventricular assist devices have become increasingly more effective in bridging patients with end-stage heart failure to transplantation. This is likely due to a combination of better patient selection, improvements in clinical practice, and evolution in device design.

Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post-transplant mortality

BACKGROUND

Bridging to transplant with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be limited by severe right ventricular failure (RVF). The focus of this study was to ascertain whether early implantation (< 24 hours) of a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) in patients with severe RVF improved survival and whether severe RVF adversely affected post-transplant survival.

METHODS

We conducted a 10-year review of our bridge to transplant experience using the Heartmate device (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA), studying patients who required an Abiomed RVAD (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA).

RESULTS

There were 243 patients who underwent LVAD implantation, of which 17 (7.0%) required an RVAD. Ten patients underwent early RVAD insertion (< 24 hours) while 7 underwent delayed insertion (> 24 hours). Bridging to transplant was successful in 11 (64.7%) RVAD patients versus 163 (72.1%) non-RVAD patients (p = 0.046). Of the 10 patients who underwent early RVAD insertion, 7 (70.0%) were successfully bridged. Of the 7 patients who underwent delayed RVAD insertion, 4 (57.1%) were successfully bridged (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-transplant 1, 5, and 10-year survival between RVAD and non-RVAD patients (71.4%, 71.4%, and 71.4% for RVAD patients, vs 90.5%, 80.4%, and 78.5%, respectively, for non-RVAD patients; p = 0.366). Pretransplant RVAD support was not a risk factor for post-transplant mortality (p = 0.864).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe RVF adversely impacted bridging to transplant, although survival was improved with early RVAD insertion. The trend toward worse post-transplant survival in the RVAD cohort raises the possibility that if additional patients were evaluated, a difference in survival might be observed, suggesting the need for a multicenter analysis.

Biventricular Support with the Jarvik 2000 Axial Flow Pump: A Feasibility Study

Patients with congestive heart failure who are supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may experience right ventricular dysfunction or failure that requires support with a right ventricular assist device (RVAD). To determine the feasibility of using a clinically available axial flow ventricular assist device as an RVAD, we implanted Jarvik 2000 pumps in the left ventricle and right atrium of two Corriente crossbred calves (approximately 100 kg each) by way of a left thoracotomy and then analyzed the hemodynamic effects in the mechanically fibrillated heart at various LVAD and RVAD speeds. Right atrial implantation of the device required no modification of either the device or the surgical technique used for left ventricular implantation. Satisfactory biventricular support was achieved during fibrillation as evidenced by an increase in mean aortic pressure from 34 mm Hg with the pumps off to 78 mm Hg with the pumps generating a flow rate of 4.8 L/min. These results indicate that the Jarvik 2000 pump, which can provide chronic circulatory support and can be powered by external batteries, is a feasible option for right ventricular support after LVAD implantation and is capable of completely supporting the circulation in patients with global heart failure.

Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy

Patient selection for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is the most important process in obtaining a successful outcome. Evaluation requires assessing the appropriateness for device implantation based on need and risk of LVAD implant to the patient. Appropriate patients can be selected without the need for invasive hemodynamic measurements and selection can be based on symptoms, appropriateness of medical therapy, and on the need for inotropic therapy. Assessing the risk of LVAD therapy to the patient requires evaluating the degree of organ dysfunction and technical factors. Patients should be offered the option of LVAD therapy if they meet criteria for need, possess the potential for organ recovery, and have appropriate operative risk.

Patient selection for the use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation

Patient selection is a critical factor in the outcome associated with the use of mechanical assist devices for the treatment of refractory heart failure/shock. Numerous risk factors impact on the outcome, many of which can be identified and treated before device surgery. This manuscript reviews all the risk factors that have been identified to date and the use of composite risk scores to predict outcome.

Extracorporeal mechanical circulatory assist

There are currently several safe and effective options to provide temporary MCS for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock or refractory heart failure. Newer device designs are currently being developed that will increase the options available to patients. Due to the technological advancements, it will be difficult to predict what devices will ultimately prove to be the most efficacious. It is likely that a variety of devices will be necessary, depending on clinical circumstances and patient characteristics.

Thoratec left ventricular assist device for bridging to recovery in fulminant acute myocarditis

Fulminant acute myocarditis can be the cause of rapid cardiac decompensation that is resistant to maximal medical therapy. Successful weaning from left ventricular mechanical support is very rare in fulminant myocarditis. We report the case of a young patient with viral myocarditis who was successfully weaned from a Thoratec left ventricular assist device with full recovery of myocardial function.

Preliminary result of an algorithm to select proper ventricular assist devices for high-risk patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not suitable for long-term support because of its high incidence of complications. Conversion from ECMO to ventricular assist device (VAD) is reasonable, and we have developed a simple algorithm for selecting proper VADs for these ECMO-supported patients.

METHODS

We converted 12 patients who were receiving ECMO support to VAD for bridge to transplantation. Group I (n = 6) was converted directly from ECMO to VAD. Group II (n = 6) underwent stage conversion. We added left atrial drainage to ECMO because of lung edema or marked left heart distension. We discontinued drainage after recovery of right heart function. Group II had more unfavorable risk factors for VAD before ECMO.

RESULTS

Three patients (50%) in Group I received biventricular VADs. The other 3 patients were converted to left ventricular assist device (LVAD), but only 1 (16.7%) experienced successful conversion. We successfully converted 5 patients (83.3%) in Group II to LVAD without right VAD, and 4 of them could be weaned from the ventilator. The multiple-organ dysfunction score gradually improved in Group II despite additional surgery. Two patients in each group received heart transplantation and survived long term.

CONCLUSION

Using a conversion protocol provides a good guideline for making decisions. According to the protocol, right heart and pulmonary function can be clearly assured before shifting to LVAD in these critical ECMO-supported patients.

Multicenter experience with the thoratec ventricular assist device in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Patient size is 1 determinant in selecting a mechanical circulatory support device. The current pulsatile ventricular assist devices (VADs) were designed primarily for average-sized adults. The flexibility of the Thoratec VAD, however, has encouraged physicians to use it in a significant number of intermediate-sized older children and adolescents.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in 58 children and adolescents <18 years (41 boys, 17 girls) who had been supported with the Thoratec VAD in 27 centers worldwide as of December 1999. Mean patient age was 13.8 years (range, 7 to 17 years), and mean patient weight and body surface area were 51.6 kg (range, 17 to 93 kg) and 1.5 m(2) (range, 0.7 to 2.1 m(2)), respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (60%) survived to transplantation and 6 (10%) to recovery of the native heart, respectively; 38 were discharged from the hospital (66%). In the transplanted group, post-transplantation survival was 97%. Patient age and size were not associated with significantly increased risk for death or adverse events. Fifteen patients (27%) had 18 neurologic events during support, and 6 of these were fatal. Left atrial cannulation proved a risk factor for neurologic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Thoratec VAD has successfully been used in a large number of children and adolescents with similar morbidity and mortality results as with adults. The risk of neurologic complications may be increased, particularly in patients cannulated in the left atria.

The use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients with primary cardiac failure as a bridge to implantable left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is an effective technique for providing emergent circulatory assistance, and may represent a life-saving option in patients who might not initially be considered a candidate for other forms of circulatory support (extracorporeal or implantable left ventricular assist device [LVAD]). In the setting of cardiac arrest, ECLS represents the only viable method of initiating circulatory support. However, ECLS has a number of disadvantages that include high complication rates (eg, stroke, bleeding) and a limited duration of potential support, which have prevented its widespread acceptance, particularly in the adult population. With the increased successful application of long-term implantable LVADs as a bridge to transplant, the major limitation of ECLS could be overcome by bridging patients to a long-term implantable LVAD ("bridge to bridge"), thereby reducing the reluctance to utilize ECLS when indicated. After acquisition of the HeartMate LVAD (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, Woburn, MA) we investigated the use of ECLS as a bridge to an implantable LVAD and subsequent transplantation in selected high-risk patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From Oct 1, 1996 to Sept 30, 2000, 33 adult patients presenting with cardiac arrest or severe hemodynamic instability were placed on ECLS for the bridge to bridge indication. Of the 33 patients, 10 patients survived to LVAD implant, 1 was bridged directly to transplant, 5 weaned from ECLS, and 16 died on ECLS. Overall, 12 patients survived to discharge. One-year actuarial survival from the initiation of ECLS was 36%. One-year actuarial survival from the time of LVAD implant, conditional on surviving ECLS, was 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-year survival of adult patients placed on ECLS and who subsequently survived to an implantable LVAD was favorable. These data support a strategy of ECLS to implantable LVAD bridge to heart transplant in adult patients who are in need of circulatory support and who are not initially candidates for other forms of mechanical support. The favorable results of this strategy support utilization of ECLS even in situations where myocardial recovery is thought to be unlikely.

A versatile intracorporeal ventricular assist device based on the thoratec VAD system

BACKGROUND

As patients are supported for longer durations with paracorporeal Thoratec left ventricular and biventricular assist devices (longest durations: 515 and 457 days, respectively), there is a need for implantable options.

METHODS

We are developing a small, simple, and versatile intracorporeal ventricular assist device (IVAD) for left, right, or biventricular support as an alternative to the large, implantable, pulsatile left ventricular assist device (LVAD) systems available today. The new device is based on the Thoratec paracorporeal VAD that has been used in more than 1,400 patients weighing from 17 to 144 kg and for durations exceeding 1 year including patient discharge (using the portable driver).

RESULTS

The IVAD has the same blood flow path and Thoralon polyurethane blood pumping sac as the paracorporeal VAD, but the housing is a smooth contoured, polished titanium alloy. The IVAD has a new sensor to detect when the pump is full and empty, and is controlled with the Thoratec TLC-II portable VAD driver, which is a small, briefcase-sized, battery-powered, pneumatic control unit. A small flexible (9 mm OD) percutaneous pneumatic driveline for each VAD is tunneled out of the body from the LVAD or right VAD in a pre- or intraperitoneal position. Small size and simplicity are the major advantages of the new device. The IVAD weight (339 g) and implanted volume (252 mL) are approximately one-half that of the current implantable pulsatile electromechanical LVAD systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The small size of the IVAD should not only allow support of a large range of patient sizes and body habitus, but also provide options for implantable left, right, or biventricular support. By implanting only the mechanically simple blood pump, the more complex control unit is external, where it can be serviced and replaced without surgery. The IVAD with the portable driver will be a viable alternative to large implanted electromechanical systems and should address a larger segment of the physically diverse patient population.

Assessment of an extracorporeal life support to LVAD bridge to heart transplant strategy

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is an effective technique for providing emergent circulatory assistance. However, its use in adult patients is associated with poor survival when myocardial function fails to recover. Due to the prolonged waiting times for heart transplantation, ECLS as a bridge to transplant is associated with poor survival. In addition, ECLS has been reported to be a significant risk factor for death after bridging to an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). After acquisition of the HeartMate LVAD (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc) in October 1996, we began using ECLS as a bridge to an implantable LVAD and subsequently transplantation in selected high-risk patients.

METHODS

From October 1, 1996 to December 1, 1999, 60 adult patients presenting with cardiogenic shock were evaluated for circulatory assistance.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (group 1) with cardiac arrest or severe hemodynamic instability and multiorgan failure were placed on ECLS. Eight patients survived to LVAD implant, 1 was bridged directly to transplant, and 4 weaned from ECLS. Nine patients in group 1 survived to discharge. Thirty patients (group 2) underwent LVAD implant without ECLS. Twenty-three were bridged to transplant, with 22 surviving to discharge. Five patients (group 3) were placed on extracorporeal ventricular assist with 3 bridged to transplant and all surviving to discharge. One-year actuarial survival from the initiation of circulatory support was 36% (group 1), 73% (group 2), and 60% (group 3). One-year actuarial survival from the time of LVAD implant in group 1, conditional on surviving ECLS, was 75% (p = NS compared with group 2).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected high-risk patients, LVAD survival after initial ECLS was not different from survival after LVAD support alone. An initial period of resuscitation with ECLS is an effective strategy to salvage patients with cardiac arrest or extreme hemodynamic instability and multiorgan injury.

Predictors of survival in patients bridged to transplantation with the thoratec VAD device: a single-center retrospective study on more than 100 patients

BACKGROUND

Careful patient selection markedly influences the outcome of patients who undergo mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, we tried to evaluate predictors of survival after implantation of the Thoratec ventricular assist device (VAD).

METHODS

Between October 1992 and January 2000, 104 patients (86 men, 18 women, aged 11 to 69 years) received the Thoratec VAD as a bridge to transplant. A total of 51 patients required left ventricular support (LVAD), 50 patients required biventricular support (BVAD), and 3 patients required total artificial heart implantation. We performed univariate analysis of 25 parameters with regard to their effect on survival and then applied a multivariate analysis to evaluate those factors that turned out to be marginally significant. We performed all analysis for the total collective as well as for the LVAD and BVAD sub-group.

RESULTS

The BVAD patients tended to have worse outcomes than did LVAD patients. We found no significant predictors of survival in either sub-group. In the total collective, however, we found the following pre-implant conditions were independent risk factors for survival after VAD implantation: patient age > 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.87, confidence interval [CI] 1.39 to 10.76), pre-implant ventilation (OR, 6.76; CI 2.42 to 18.84), and increased pre-implant total bilirubin (OR, 1.42; CL, 1.19 to 1.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Transplant candidates on inotropic support should be considered for bridging to transplant as soon as bilirubin values start to increase or before respiratory function deteriorates and ventilation becomes necessary. In elderly patients, careful patient selection, particularly considering potential risk factors, might favorably affect their outcomes.

Survival outcomes of patients with giant cell myocarditis bridged by ventricular assist devices

Giant cell myocarditis is a highly lethal disorder characterized by rapidly progressive congestive heart failure. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course of patients with giant cell myocarditis who received a ventricular assist device. Patients with giant cell myocarditis were identified from the Multicenter Giant cell Myocarditis Registry. Bridging to cardiac transplantation in the giant cell myocarditis patients who received a ventricular assist device was compared with bridging in the general population of heart failure patients, as reported in the literature. Median posttransplantation survival for patients with giant cell myocarditis who received and did not receive ventricular assist devices was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with use of the log-rank test. Nine patients with giant cell myocarditis who received ventricular assist devices were identified. Seven patients survived to transplantation, four were alive 30 days posttransplantation, and two survived to 1 year. The rate of successful bridging to transplantation in seven of nine patients (78%) is similar to that reported for other ventricular assist device recipients. Posttransplantation survival of 57% (4 of 7) at 30 days and 29% (2 of 7) at 1 year was significantly lower compared with 93% 1-year survival of the 30 patients with giant cell myocarditis who did not receive ventricular assist devices before transplantation (p<0.001). Ventricular assist devices can be an effective bridge to transplantation for patients with heart failure caused by giant cell myocarditis. Although their posttransplantation survival was poor in our series, a few patients had long-term survival.

Right ventricular assist system feedback flow control parameter for a rotary blood pump

At least 25-30% of patients with a permanent implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) experience right ventricular failure; therefore, an implantable biventricular assist system (BiVAS) with small centrifugal pumps is being developed. Many institutions are focusing and developing a control system for a left ventricular assist system (LVAS) with rotary blood pumps. These authors feel that the right ventricular assist system (RVAS) with rotary blood pumps should be developed simultaneously. A literature search indicated no recent reports on the effect of hemodynamics and exercise with this type of nonpulsatile implantable RVAS. In this study, a calf with an implantable right ventricular assist system (RVAS) was subjected to 30 min of exercise on a treadmill at 1.5 mph, resulting in excellent hemodynamics. The input voltage remained unchanged. Hemodynamic recordings were taken every 5 min throughout the testing period, and blood gas analysis was done every 10 min. Oxygen uptake (VO2), oxygen delivery (DO2), and oxygen extraction (O2ER) were calculated and analyzed. Two different pump flows were investigated: Group 1 low assist (<3.5 L/min) and Group 2 high assist (>3.5 L/min). In both groups, the RVAS flow rates were unchanged while the pulmonary artery (PA) flow increased during exercise; also, the heart rate and right atrial pressure (RAP) increased during exercise. There were no significant differences in the 2 groups. The PA flow correlates to the heart rate during exercise. In all of the tests, the VO2 and DO2 increased during exercise. Regarding VO2, no changes were observed during the different flow conditions; however, the DO2 of Group 2 was higher than that of Group 1. Because the implantable RVAS did not have pump flow changes during the test conditions, it was necessary to incorporate a flow control system for the implantable RVAS. During exercise with an implantable RVAS rotary blood pump, incorporating the heart rate and VO2 as feedback parameters is feasible for controlling the flow rate.

The thoratec ventricular assist device: a paracorporeal pump for treating acute and chronic heart failure

The Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) System (Thoratec Laboratories, Pleasanton, CA) is a paracorporeal pump that can provide univentricular or biventricular assistance for patients with heart failure. The system consists of a prosthetic ventricle that has a blood-pumping chamber of Thoralon (Thoratec Laboratories) polyurethane, cannulas for univentricular or biventricular support, and either a hospital-based pneumatic drive console or a portable battery-powered drive unit. For biventricular assistance, 2 pumps are used. The Thoratec voluntary registry indicates that, as of May 2000, this system had been implanted in 1,376 patients, mainly for bridging to transplantation (828 patients) or postcardiotomy support (195 patients); the remaining 353 patients received a hybrid configuration of the device or had incomplete information, so they are not included in this analysis. In the 828 bridge-to-transplant patients, the Thoratec system provided biventricular assistance in 472 cases, left ventricular assistance in 326 cases, and right ventricular assistance in 30 cases for up to 515 days. During the support period, the cardiac index increased significantly from 1.4 +/- 0.8 L/min/m2 to 3.0 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 (with biventricular assistance and left ventricular cannulation). Sixty percent of the 828 patients underwent transplantation, and the posttransplant survival rate was 86%. In the 195 patients who needed postcardiotomy support, VADs were used for up to 80 days for cardiac recovery. Thirty-eight percent of the patients were weaned from the VAD, and 59% of the weaned group were discharged from the hospital. In addition, 49 postcardiotomy patients were considered for transplantation; of these, 32 received a transplant and 23 were discharged. Patient mobility is being improved by the use of a portable driver. The Thoratec VAD is suitable for a wide range of applications, and efforts are underway to facilitate patient mobility and allow hospital discharge. An intracorporeal version of the VAD, which is currently under development, will help achieve these goals.

Development of the NEDO implantable ventricular assist device with Gyro centrifugal pump

The Gyro centrifugal pump, PI (permanently implantable) series, is being developed as a totally implantable artificial heart. Our final goal is to establish a "functional TAH," a totally implantable biventricular assist system (BiVAS) with centrifugal pumps. A plastic prototype pump, Gyro PI 601, was evaluated through in vitro and in vivo studies as a single ventricular assist device (VAD). Based upon these results, the pump head material was converted to a titanium alloy, and the actuator was modified. These titanium Gyro pumps, PI 700 series, also were subjected to in vitro and in vivo studies. The Gyro PI 601 and PI 700 series have the same inner dimensions and characteristics, such as the eccentric inlet port, double pivot bearing system, secondary vane, and magnet coupling system; however, the material of the PI 700 is different from the PI 601. The Gyro PI series is driven by the Vienna DC brushless motor actuator. The inlet cannula of the right ventricular assist system (RVAS) specially made for this system consists of 2 parts: a hat-shaped silicone tip biolized with gelatin and an angled wire reinforced tube made of polyvinylchloride. The pump-actuator package was implanted into 8 calves in the preperitoneal space, bypassing from the left ventricle apex to the descending aorta for the left ventricular assist system (LVAS) and bypassing the right ventricle to the main pulmonary artery for the RVAS. According to the PI 601 feasibility protocol, 2 LVAS cases were terminated after 2 weeks, and 1 LVAS case and 1 RVAS were terminated after 1 month. The PI 700 series was implanted into 4 cases: 3 LVAS cases survived for a long term, 2 of them over 200 days (72-283 days), and 1 RVAS case survived for 1 month and was terminated according to the protocol for a short-term antithrombogenic screening and system feasibility study. Regarding power consumption, the plastic pump cases demonstrated from 6.2 to 12.1 W as LVAS and 7.3 W as RVAS, the titanium pump cases showed from 10.4 to 14.2 W as LVAS and 15.8 W as RVAS. All cases exhibited low hemolysis. The renal function and the liver function were maintained normally in all cases throughout these experimental periods. In the 2 RVAS cases, pulmonary function was normally maintained. No calves demonstrated thromboembolic signs or symptoms throughout the experiments except Case 1 with the plastic pump. However, in the plastic pump cases, bilateral renal infarction was suspected in 2 cases during necropsy whereas no abnormal findings were revealed in the titanium pump cases. There were also no blood clots inside the PI 700 series. As for the 601, the explanted pumps demonstrated slight thrombus formations at the top and bottom pivots except in 1 case. The Gyro PI series, especially the PI 700 series, demonstrated superior performance, biocompatibility, antithrombogenicity and low hemolysis. Also, the durability of the actuator was demonstrated. Based on these results, this titanium centrifugal pump is suitable as an implantable LVAS and RVAS. It is likely that the Gyro PI series is a feasible component of the BiVAS functional TAH.

Ten-year follow-up of critically ill patients undergoing heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The long-term result following heart transplantation appears very good despite complications of coronary atherosclerosis and cancer. Critically ill patients supported with mechanical devices remain a growing and difficult group in which long-term results need to be defined. The objective of this study was to review the 10-year follow-up of critically ill patients who underwent heart transplantation after support with mechanical devices.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent heart transplantation from 1986 to 1999 at the Montreal Heart Institute.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (22/199, 11%) underwent heart transplantation after support with intra-aortic balloon pumps (n = 17) and total artificial hearts (n = 5). One hundred seventy-seven patients (177/199, 89%) underwent heart transplantation without pre-operative mechanical assistance. Patients with pre-operative mechanical assistance were younger (41 +/- 12 vs 48 +/- 10 years old, p = 0. 002), underwent a shorter waiting time to transplantation (2 +/- 2 vs 19 +/- 27 weeks, p = 0.004), and donor hearts had longer ischemic time (166 +/- 63 vs 137 +/- 49 minutes, p = 0.002) compared with patients without pre-operative mechanical assistance. One-month, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival averaged 86% +/- 7%, 67% +/- 10%, 67% +/- 10%, and 59% +/- 12%, respectively, in patients with pre-operative mechanical assistance compared with 95% +/- 2%, 88% +/- 2%, 81% +/- 3%, and 74% +/- 4%, respectively, in patients without assistance, a significant difference (p = 0.04) that is mainly related to higher operative mortality in the former group. Although, we found no difference between the 2 groups in the 10-year freedom rate from acute rejection, infection, cancer, and coronary atherosclerosis, sepsis was the cause of 4 early deaths among patients with pre-operative mechanical assistance.

CONCLUSION

Early and long-term survival was significantly decreased in critically ill patients with pre-operative mechanical assistance compared with other patients without pre-operative assistance. Sepsis is a dominant threat among patients who underwent heart transplantation with pre-operative mechanical assistance, and the lower survival is due mainly to the increased early mortality.

Development of an intracorporeal Thoratec ventricular assist device for univentricular or biventricular support

There is a need for a small, simple, and versatile intracorporeal ventricular assist device (IVAD) as an alternative to the large implantable electromechanical LVAD systems in current use. Because the basic design of the Thoratec paracorporeal VAD has been demonstrated in over 1,000 patients, weighing from 17 to 144 kg, and for durations up to 515 days including patient discharge (by using the portable driver), we are developing a new intracorporeal version of our VAD. This IVAD has a smooth contoured, polished titanium housing, and maintains the same blood flow path and Thoralon polyurethane blood pumping sac as the paracorporeal VAD. The IVAD is controlled with the Thoratec TLC-II Portable VAD Driver, which is a small briefcase sized, battery powered, pneumatic control unit. Intracorporeal LVADs and/or RVADs are implanted in a preperitoneal position, with a single small (9 mm OD) percutaneous pneumatic driveline for each VAD. The major advantages of the new IVAD design are size and simplicity. The IVAD weight (339 g) and implanted volume (252 ml) are substantially smaller than current implantable electromechanical LVAD systems. Only the small blood pump is implanted, leaving the more complex control unit external, where it can be serviced and replaced. The versatile design is intended for left and/or right heart support in large or small patients. The IVAD in combination with the TLC-II portable driver will be a viable and attractive alternative to large, implanted electromechanical systems.

Development of an implantable small right ventricular assist device

Currently, at least two permanent implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used clinically. Unfortunately, there is no small implantable right ventricular assist device (RVAD) available, even though at least 25-30% of this patient population has right ventricular failure. If a small implantable RVAD were available, biventricular assist could support patients with right ventricular failure. A small atraumatic and antithrombogenic RVAD is being developed to meet this clinical need. This small centrifugal blood pump, the Gyro PI pump, is 6.5 cm in diameter and 4.6 cm in height and has three unique characteristics to prevent thrombus formation: (1) the double pivot bearing and magnetic coupling system enable this pump to be completely sealless; (2) the secondary vanes at the bottom of the impeller accelerate the blood flow and prevent blood stagnation; and (3) the eccentric inlet port enables the top female bearing to be embedded into the top housing and decrease blood cell trauma. The inflow conduit consists of a wire reinforced tube and a hat-shaped tip that is biolized with gelatin to create a thrombus resistant material. This conduit is directly implanted into the right ventricle, and the outflow conduit is anastomosed to the PA. The pump can be implanted inside the abdominal wall or in the thoracic cavity. Biocompatibility of this pump was proved in two calves by thrombus free implantation as an LVAD for 284 days and 200 days. Two RVAD implantations were conducted, aiming for 1-month system feasibility studies. During the month, the RVADs operated satisfactorily without any thromboembolic incident. No blood clots or abnormal findings were seen inside the pump, nor were there abnormal findings in the explanted lungs except for small areas of atelectasis. The pump flow was 3.02 +/- 0.38 L/min in calf 1 and 3.75 +/- 1.18 L/min in calf 2. The power requirement was 7.28 +/- 0.43W for calf 1 and 14.52 +/- 3.93W for calf 2. The PaO2 was 72.0 +/- 3.60 mm Hg (calf 1) and 72.0 +/- 7.63 mm Hg (calf 2); PaCO2 was 38.3 +/- 2.17 mm Hg (calf 1) and 34.1 +/- 1.95 mm Hg (calf 2); and SaO2 was 94.1 +/- 1.37% (calf1) and 95.0 +/- 1.95% (calf 2). Gas exchange via the lungs was maintained. These studies indicate that the Gyro PI pump is suitable as a single implantable RVAD, and is a feasible RVAD as a part of a BiVAD system in terms of pump performance and thrombus resistance.

Single-center experience with the thoratec ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVE

The Thoratec ventricular assist device (Thoratec Laboratories, Pleasanton, Calif) is widely accepted for univentricular and biventricular support in patients with various indications. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with implantation of the Thoratec ventricular assist device in more than 100 patients.

METHODS

From March 1992 to June 1998, 114 patients (98 men and 16 women; mean age, 47.9 years) received the Thoratec ventricular assist device for a mean duration of 44.9 days. The patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 included 84 patients in whom the system was applied as a bridge-to-transplant procedure. Group 2 included 17 patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, and group 3 included 13 patients with cardiogenic shock of other causes.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight percent of patients in group 1 survived to transplantation with a posttransplant survival of 88%. The only independent risk factor affecting survival was age more than 60 years. Survivals in groups 2 and 3 were 47% and 31%, respectively. Main complications in all groups were bleeding, multiple organ failure, liver failure, sepsis, and neurologic disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The Thoratec ventricular assist device has proved to be a reliable device for bridge to transplantation and postcardiotomy support. Further studies are required on patient selection and on patient and device management to reduce the incidence of complications in these patient populations.

Bridge to recovery with a left ventricular assist device for fulminant acute myocarditis

Acute fulminant myocarditis frequently causes circulatory collapse that is resistant to conventional therapy. We describe a case in which a patient with histologically confirmed viral myocarditis was supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to recovery. The LVAD was successfully weaned 3 weeks later.

Cardiac assist devices

During the latter half of the twentieth century, physicians have had the capability to support the circulation with mechanical devices. This article gives an historical overview of those devices. Various devices and their complications are described and evaluated. Patient selection and clinical results also are discussed.

Importance of preoperative liver function as a predictor of survival in patients supported with Thoratec ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation

Patient selection is crucial for the success of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to identify preoperative markers for survival and end-organ recovery in patients having a ventricular assist device.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 32 severely ill patients with end-stage cardiac failure being mechanically bridged to heart transplantation with the Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device System (Thoratec Laboratories Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif) in a single center between 1984 and 1995. The preoperative cardiac index averaged 1.6 L/min per square meter with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 29 mm Hg. Because of a high incidence of hepatic or renal dysfunction, or both (total bilirubin: 3.5 +/- 6.2 mg/dL; creatinine: 2.0 +/- 1.3 mg/dL), biventricular support was used in most patients (28/32). A total of 30 preoperative and 4 perioperative variables were evaluated for their association with survival and liver recovery.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (59.4%) survived to transplantation and 13 died. All 19 patients undergoing transplantation were discharged alive with a 1-year survival of 94.4%. All patients without liver recovery died of multiorgan failure. Direct and indirect bilirubin measurements were the only significant predictors for survival to discharge (P = .036, .045); all other factors failed to show significance. As direct bilirubin levels increased (normal range, 3 times normal, and >3 times normal), patient survival decreased (82 %, 56%, and 33 %, respectively). In addition, bilirubin and liver enzyme levels before insertion of the assist device were significantly associated with liver recovery during support with the device.

CONCLUSION

In our patient population with ventricular assist devices, liver function is the most predictive factor of patient survival in bridging to transplantation.

HeartMate left ventricular assist device as bridge to heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Because of the limited supply of donor hearts, prospective recipients continue to die while on the waiting list for heart transplantation. Use of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices as a bridge to transplantation may reduce this mortality. However, with the present state of technology, continued clinical evaluation of the various long-term, mechanical circulatory support devices available is mandatory.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were bridged with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to heart transplantation for New York Heart Association functional class IV cardiac failure. Twelve pneumatic and six electric devices were used. The mean cardiac index and the mean pulmonary vascular resistance of the patient cohort were 1.71 x min(-1) x m(-2) and 3.1 Wood units, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean LVAD support time per transplanted patient was 237 days, with a cumulative LVAD support time of about 7.2 years. Bleeding was the main operative and postoperative complication. Two patients suffered from neurologic complications and there were two major incidents of device malfunction. Twelve patients (75%) now have received a transplant, 3 (19%) are awaiting a transplant, and in 1 patient (6%), the device was explanted after spontaneous left ventricular recovery. Eleven of the 12 patients who received a transplant are alive and doing well. The HeartMate LVAD gave adequate circulatory support over extended periods of time and reversed the vital organ dysfunction. Since the start of the LVAD program, only 1 patient has died on our heart transplantation waiting list, compared to nine deaths in the 2 preceding years.

CONCLUSIONS

The HeartMate LVAD bridge to heart transplantation can be performed with low post-LVAD implantation and posttransplantation mortality and offers 1- and 2-year posttransplantation actuarial survival rates comparable to those for nonbridged heart transplant recipients.

Cardiopulmonary bypass circuit treated with surface-modifying additives: a clinical evaluation of blood compatibility

BACKGROUND

The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit induces blood activation and a systemic inflammatory response in cardiac surgical patients. The CPB circuit treated with surface-modifying additive (SMA) has been found to reduce blood activation by in vitro and ex vivo experiments. This study evaluates the surface thrombogenicity and complement activation of SMA circuits during clinical CPB.

METHODS

Twenty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly divided into two groups. In the SMA group (n = 10), all blood-contacting surfaces in the CPB circuit were treated or coated with SMA, whereas in the control group (n = 10) patients were perfused with an identical circuit without treatment.

RESULTS

During CPB, platelet count and beta-thromboglobulin were found similar in both the SMA and the control groups. Prothrombin activation indicated by fragment F1 + 2 was found less in the SMA group (p < 0.05). After CPB, platelet deposition on the CPB circuit was significantly less (p < 0.05) in the SMA group than in the control group as assessed by the labeled monoclonal antibody against platelet glycoprotein IIIa. Complement activation identified by C3a and terminal complex C5b-9 did not differ between the two groups, but C4a generation was less in the SMA group (p < 0.05). Leukocyte activation identified by elastase and cytokine release indicated by interleukin-8 were found uniformly in both groups. Postoperatively, chest tube drainage, blood transfusion, duration of ventilatory support, as well as the intensive care unit and hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary clinical results suggest that SMA inhibits platelet interaction with the biomaterial surface of the CPB circuit. Complement activation assessed by the terminal complement complex is not influenced by SMA. The clinical benefit of this surface-modifying technique has yet to be assessed in a larger population of patients undergoing cardiac operations.