Survival of dialysis patients after cardiac arrest and the impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Increased Complication Rates of Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices in ESRD Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a high incidence of sudden cardiac death and may benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, ESRD also may predispose patients to device-related complications, potentially offsetting some of the benefits of prophylactic ICD placement. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of complications after cardiac rhythm management device (CRMD) implantation in patients with and without ESRD.

METHODS

An observational study was performed on 41 patients with ESRD and 123 controls without ESRD who had a CRMD (permanent pacemaker or ICD) implanted at a single institution from 1998 to 2005. Controls were matched for age, sex, type of device, and calendar year of device implantation. Primary and secondary end points were any complication and complications requiring intervention, respectively.

RESULTS

23 complications occurred in 16 of 41 patients with ESRD (39%) versus 13 complications in 13 of 123 matched controls (11%; P < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 29% of patients with ESRD versus 5% of controls (P < 0.001), whereas minor complications occurred in 17% and 6%, respectively (P < 0.03). Hematoma, thrombosis, and device-related complications, including elevated defibrillation thresholds, were more common in patients with ESRD (P < 0.05 for all), and there also was a nonsignificant trend toward greater infection risk (P = 0.1). There were no fatal complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD had greater complication rates after CRMD implantation compared with matched controls, but these complications did not result in death. These results should be considered when evaluating patients with ESRD for prophylactic CRMD implantation, but do not support withholding such therapy.

Prognostic role of subclinical left ventricular abnormalities and impact of transplantation in chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

The outcome of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is influenced by overt left ventricular (LV) abnormalities. We sought the predictive value and treatment response of subclinical LV dysfunction in CKD.

METHOD

Resting and dobutamine stress echocardiography were used to identify LV enlargement, dysfunction, or ischemia in 176 patients with CKD. In 129 patients who had normal dobutamine stress echocardiography, myocardial tissue characterization was performed using tissue Doppler imaging and integrated backscatter. Clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, and patients were followed up for cardiac events and all-cause mortality over 2.4 years. Follow-up echocardiographic and tissue characterization parameters were performed in 80 patients.

RESULTS

Previous cardiac history (HR 5.2, P = .002) and serum phosphate (HR 6.2, P = .001) were independent clinical predictors of events (model chi2 = 20.9). Diastolic tissue velocity (HR 0.8, P = .05) was an independent predictor of outcome, and its addition to clinical assessment added incremental prognostic information (model chi2 = 24.8, P < .001). Patients who underwent transplantation (n = 45) showed reduction of wall thickness (P < .001) and LV volumes (P < .001) and increases in diastolic tissue velocity (P = .007) and strain (P = .001), whereas these measurements worsened in those who remained on dialysis.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CKD, subclinical LV dysfunction is associated with adverse outcome. Subclinical disease can be improved by transplantation but progresses in patients who continue on dialysis.

Modifications to advanced life support in renal failure

The outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been reported to be worse in patients with renal failure compared with those with normal renal function. It is likely that this increased mortality may be at least partly attributable to sub-optimal and highly variable treatment strategies used in cardiac arrest in patients with renal failure, but this issue has not previously been explored. Such patients undoubtedly pose a challenge to advanced life support (ALS) providers, and renal unit staff are not trained to provide specialist advice after a patient has sustained a cardiac arrest. There are few studies investigating the epidemiology, safety or outcome of cardiac arrest in patients with renal failure and there are no generally accepted resuscitation guidelines for this special circumstance. In this article we discuss the unique problems of resuscitating patients with renal failure and propose a suitable management strategy.