Effect of long-term adjuvant therapy with interferon alpha-2a in patients with regional node metastases from cutaneous melanoma: a randomised trial

Adjuvante Therapie des Melanoms

Four decades of clinical and basic research have laid a solid base for clinicians to choose the best possible treatment for patients with melanoma. There has been a relative and absolute decrease in mortality despite increasing incidence. However, this decline in mortality is primarily the result of programs for primary and secondary prevention, not therapeutic advances. Conventional and high-dose immunomodulatory regimens and cytostatic therapy have failed to improve the prognosis. Whether the high-dose interferon-alpha therapy introduced by Kirkwood et al. 2001 can produce sustainable improvement in cure rate is controversial. Further developments such as treatment with recombinant cytokines (especially IL-2 and GM-CSF), specific blockade of neoplastic signal transduction and vaccination are the central issues in current research. In the future the task will be to offer an highly individualized therapy plan, based on specific prognostic and risk criteria defined in molecular genetic parameters. Indiscriminate use of newer therapeutic approaches is simply not affordable in this age of shrinking financial resources for health care.

Cutaneous melanoma: interferon alpha adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk for recurrent disease

Systemic adjuvant therapy in melanoma patients is the systemic treatment that is administered with the goal of eradicating micrometastatic deposits in patients who are clinically free of disease after surgical removal of the primary melanoma, but with a high risk of systemic recurrence. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) is one of the most frequently used adjuvant therapies. Several randomized trials evaluated the efficacy of IFN-alpha in melanoma patients. However, results from conducted trials are controversial. Twelve randomized IFN-alpha trials are discussed in detail. All trials, including meta-analysis, failed to demonstrate a clear impact of IFN-alpha therapy on overall survival in melanoma patients. Based on currently available evidence, IFN-alpha therapy in the adjuvant setting should not be considered standard of care for patients who have melanoma. Results from ongoing studies are awaited. Further research for this therapy is required.

[Prospective study of the levels of serum cytokines in patients with melanoma: prognostic value]

INTRODUCTION

The production of cytokines plays a primordial role in the immune systems fight against tumors. Therefore, we proposed to investigate whether the serum levels of different types of cytokines in melanoma patients were associated with the evolution of their disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the variation in the serum levels of cytokines representative of the Th1 (INFg and IL-15) and Th2 (IL-6 and IL-10) phenotypes in 33 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Peripheral blood samples were obtained every six months until we had a total of 4 samples per patient.

RESULTS

After 30 months, 29 patients (87.9 %) had survived with no signs of recurrence. Basal IL-10 serum levels were higher in the group of patients who expired than in the survivors. Among the patients who expired, an increase in IL-6 serum levels was observed in the last sample. No relationship could be proven between INFg and IL-15 levels and melanoma progression.

CONCLUSION

Determining the levels of type Th2 cytokines (IL-6 and IL-10) in the serum of melanoma patients could be useful in the clinical follow-up of these patients and serve as a predictive factor for the progression of the disease, with the prognosis being worse for patients with high IL-10 and IL-6 levels. On the other hand, determining the serum levels of type Th1 cytokines (IL-15 and INFg) does not seem to be as useful in predicting the prognosis.

Systematic review of systemic adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk for recurrent melanoma

The authors examined the role of systemic adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk, resected, primary melanoma. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse effects, and quality of life. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to locate randomized controlled trials, practice guidelines, meta-analyses, and reviews published between 1980 and 2004. Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials, 2 meta-analyses, and 1 systematic review were identified that investigated interferon, levamisole, vaccine, or chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy. For high-dose interferon-alpha, the results from 3 randomized trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group were pooled, and a meta-analysis of 2-year death rates yielded a risk ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.99; P = .03). Five randomized trials comparing low-dose interferon-alpha with observation only after surgery did not detect a statistically significant improvement in overall survival. A meta-analysis of 4 levamisole trials did not demonstrate a significant survival benefit for levamisole over control; similarly, no survival benefit was demonstrated by data from randomized controlled trials with vaccines (9 trials) or with chemotherapy (10 trials). In this review of the available literature, no systemic adjuvant therapy was identified that conferred a significant overall survival benefit in patients with high-risk, resected, primary melanoma. However, high-dose interferon should be considered in the treatment of these patients, because such therapy is associated with a significant improvement in disease-free survival and a reduction in 2-year mortality. Until the results of ongoing trials are available, the authors could not state with confidence whether such therapy benefits patients with microscopically detected, sentinel lymph node-positive disease.

Update: current management issues in malignant melanoma

The incidence of melanoma has increased continuously during the last decade. Surgery is the mainstay of therapy but, for patients with thick lesions or regional metastatic lymph nodes, there is a high risk of relapse. For this group of patients, there is no standard therapy or general agreement amongst oncologists. In this article, we review the current management of melanoma with regard to past completed adjuvant trials and open trials. Moreover, we discuss the role of chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma, in particular with attention to the use of fotemustine.

Post-surgery adjuvant therapy with intermediate doses of interferon alfa 2b versus observation in patients with stage IIb/III melanoma (EORTC 18952): randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Individuals affected by melanoma with thick primary tumours or regional node involvement have a poor outlook, with only 30-50% alive at 5 years. High-dose and low-dose interferon alfa have been assessed for the treatment of these patients, with the former having considerable toxicity and a consistent effect on disease free survival, but not on overall survival, and the latter no consistent effect on either. Our aim was, therefore, to assess the effect of two regimens of interferon of intermediate dose versus observation alone on distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI) and overall survival in such patients.

METHODS

We did a randomised controlled trial in 1388 patients who had had a thick primary tumour (thickness > or = 4 mm) resected (stage IIb) or regional lymph node metastases dissected (stage III) and had been assigned to 13-months (n=553) or 25 months (n=556) of treatment with subcutaneous interferon alfa 2b, or observation (n=279). Treatment comprised 4 weeks of 10 million units (MU) of interferon alfa (5 days per week) followed by either 10 MU three times a week for 1 year or 5 MU three times a week for 2 years, to a total dose of 1760 MU. Our primary endpoint was DMFI. Analyses were by intent to treat.

FINDINGS

After a median follow-up of 4.65 years, we had recorded 760 distant metastases and 681 deaths. At 4.5 years, the 25-month interferon group showed a 7.2% increase in rate of DMFI (hazard ratio 0.83, 97.5% CI 0.66-1.03) and a 5.4% improvement in overall survival. The 13-month interferon group showed a 3.2% increase in rate of DMFI at 4.5 years (0.93, 0.75-1.16) and no extension of overall survival. Toxicity was acceptable, with 18% (195 of 1076) of patients going off study because of toxicity or as a result of refusal of treatment because of side-effects.

INTERPRETATION

Interferon alfa as used in the regimens studied does not improve outcome for patients with stage IIb/III melanomas, and cannot be recommended. With respect to efficacy of the drug, duration of treatment seemed more important than dose, and should be assessed in future trials.

Adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma: where are we?

To date, no standard adjuvant therapy have increased overall survival in patients with malignant melanoma (MM). The effect of interferon alpha as a single agent or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials. Critical reading of the major international randomised trials showed that response to interferon (IFN) in terms of improvement of overall survival (OS) may not be strictly correlated with the used dosage and that duration of therapy may impact disease-free survival (DFS) but not OS. Patients' heterogeneity could be an explanation for the discordant data of the international literature. Indeed, majority of these studies started in late 1980s or early 1990s, when accurate staging procedure were not available yet. The adequate surgical treatment should be considered as an independent variable in the analysis of MM adjuvant protocols. Considering the treatment cost, which is the main goal: DFS, OS or quality of life? Answering these questions is difficult, but some considerations must be taken to put order in this field. Putting together data from all different studies, IFN therapy seems to protect MM patients from recurrences during the entire treatment period and a prolonged IFN therapy seems to improve DFS. The only positive result on OS was demonstrated for high-dose IFN (HD-IFN) in a single study (presenting a relatively short follow-up median) and not confirmed in a subsequent study from the same authors. Considering that low-dose interferon (LD-IFN) is tolerated much better than HD-IFN (about 10% versus more than 70% of cases with grade 3-4 toxicity, respectively), a prolonged LD-IFN (more than 2 years) may represent a reasonable opportunity for MM patients, also considering its advantageous cost-effectiveness. Conversely, considering the improvement of OS as the main target of MM adjuvant therapy, the "wait and watch" attitude remains the only approach to be pursued at present. It is a physician's choice.

Melanoma treatment update

Except for high-dose interferon as adjuvant therapy in stage III disease, little success has emerged over the last 20 years for metastatic melanoma. Recent advances in melanoma biology suggest that disarming oncogenic mechanisms in melanoma may be an attractive approach to therapy. For instance, sustained expression of Bcl2 has been associated with an increased resistance to apoptosis, and recently, anti-sense-mediated reduction of Bcl2 levels was shown to chemosensitize patients to dacarbazine, dimethyl triazino imidazole carboxomide, or DTIC. Likewise, the identification of activating mutations in the RAS signaling pathway, including the NRAS and BRAF genes, opens up new therapeutic options for RAS and RAF inhibitors. A more thorough understanding of melanoma biology and tumor immunology will undoubtedly yield new promise for patients with advanced disease.

Dose-Dependent Treatment Benefit in High-Risk Melanoma Patients Receiving Adjuvant High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b

This retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive high-risk melanoma patients treated with high-dose interferon alfa-2b at a single institution demonstrates similar relapse-free and overall survival data, as previously published from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Intergroup trials. The data suggest at least a transient dose dependency of the treatment effect on relapse-free and overall survival with high-dose interferon in high-risk melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant high-dose interferon seems to be the best adjuvant treatment option for patients with high-risk melanoma (AJCC-stage IIC, III) after definitive surgery.

METHODS

One-hundred fifty consecutive patients were treated at our institution during the period from September 1997 to March 2003 were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 35 months, 63% of patients had developed a melanoma relapse, and 37% were relapse- free. Fifty-five percent of patients are still alive, and 45% had died-all but 3 patients from melanoma. Patients with stage IIC disease demonstrated a similar unfavorable course of disease as patients with stage IIIC disease (2-year relapse-free survival 18% and 26%). We identified two groups of patients with different cumulative interferon dose-levels (> or =90% and <90% of the projected dose, according to the protocol), who demonstrated at least transient differences, both in terms of relapse-free and overall survival; the predictive impact was statistically independent upon the Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical data are consistent with the published ECOG and Intergroup data dealing with highdose interferon in high-risk melanoma patients. The data suggest a dose-dependency on the treatment effect and, therefore, support further prospective trials comparing different dose-distribution patterns in high-dose interferon.

The role of biological response modifiers in malignant melanoma

This article reviews the existing data in an attempt to address the role of biological response modifiers (IFN-alpha and IL-2) in the management of melanoma. Eight prospective controlled Phase III trials evaluating IFN-alpha therapy are discussed. As the results from these trials have been heterogeneous and inconsistent, the role of IFN-alpha in the adjuvant treatment of stage II and III melanoma patients remains to be defined. IL-2 possesses modest antitumour activity in melanoma yielding objective response in approximately 15% of patients. Many toxic effects are induced by high-dose IL-2 therapy. Combinations of chemotherapy and biological response modifiers and their impact on tumour response and survival are discussed.

Verrucous plaque on the foot

Amelanotic melanoma can present clinically in multiple ways, often mimicking benign processes. This makes diagnosis more difficult and often delays proper medical attention. This case report highlights the importance of having a high suspicion of melanoma in cases that do not behave clinically as expected.

BRAF alterations are associated with complex mutational profiles in malignant melanoma

To evaluate the mutational profiles associated with BRAF mutations in human melanoma, we have studied BRAF, RAS, PTEN, TP53, CDKN2A and CDK4 genes and their expression in melanoma lesions. Owing to the lack of sufficient material from fresh specimens, we employed short-term cell lines obtained from melanoma biopsies. In all, 41 melanoma obtained from eight primary lesions, 20 nodal, 11 cutaneous and two visceral metastases from patients with sporadic (n=31), familial (n=4) and multiple melanoma (n=2) were analysed. The results revealed novel missense mutations in the BRAF, PTEN, CDKN2A and CDK4 genes. Overall, activating mutations of BRAF and loss of functional p16 and ARF were detected in the majority of melanomas (29/41, 36/41 and 29/41, respectively), while PTEN alterations/loss, NRAS and TP53 mutations occurred less frequently (6/41, 6/41 and 10/41, respectively). In the resulting 12 mutational profiles, p16/ARF loss associated with mutated BRAFV599E was the most represented (n=15). In addition, TP53 and PTEN mutations were always accompanied with BRAF alterations, while PTEN loss was found in association with CDKN2A or TP53 mutations in the absence of BRAF activation. The p16/ARFDelta+BRAF/RAS profile was significantly associated with a longer survival, while complex mutational profiles were detected in highly aggressive disease and poor survival. These data support the existence of several molecularly defined melanoma groups which likely reflect different clinical/biological behaviour, thus suggesting that a more extensive molecular classification of melanoma would significantly impact its clinical management.

Immunotherapy for melanoma

The immunogenicity of melanoma and the identification of melanoma-associated antigens is the basis for immunotherapy. This review will discuss the current status of melanoma immunotherapy with a focus on non-specific cytokines and highly specific vaccines, including peptides, viruses, dendritic cells, and whole cell vaccines. The passive transfer of melanoma-specific monoclonal antibodies and T-cells will also be reviewed. The problem of tumor escape and the association of immunotherapy to autoimmunity will be discussed. The use of immunotherapy in combination with other therapeutic agents and genetic profiling to predict responses suggests that immunotherapy will continue to play a role in the treatment of melanoma.

Final results of the EORTC 18871/DKG 80-1 randomised phase III trial. rIFN-alpha2b versus rIFN-gamma versus ISCADOR M versus observation after surgery in melanoma patients with either high-risk primary (thickness >3 mm) or regional lymph node metastasis

Between 1988 and 1996, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group (EORTC-MG) performed a prospective, randomised phase III adjuvant trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low dose recombinant interferon-alpha 2 b (rIFN-alpha2b) (1 MU) or recombinant interferon gamma (rIFN-gamma), (0.2 mg) both given subcutaneously (s.c.), every other day (qod), for 12 months in comparison with an untreated control group. The German Cancer Society (DKG) added a fourth arm with Iscador M, a popular mistletoe extract. High-risk stage II patients (thickness >3 mm) and stage III patients (positive lymph nodes) without distant metastasis were randomised and followed until their first progression or death. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. From 1988 to 1996, a total of 830 patients were randomised: 423 in the three-arm EORTC 18871 trial and 407 patients in the four-arm DKG 80-1 trial. The median follow-up was 8.2 years and a total of 537 relapses and 475 deaths were reported. At 8 years, the disease-free interval (DFI) rate was 32.4% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 40.0%. In terms of the DFI, the hazard ratio estimates (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) were: 1.04 (0.84, 1.30) for the comparison of rIFN-alpha2b versus control, 0.96 (0.77, 1.20) for rIFN-gamma versus control, and 1.32 (0.93, 1.87) for Iscador M versus control. In terms of OS, the corresponding estimates (95% CI) for the 3 treatment comparisons were: for IFN-alpha2b 0.96 (0.76, 1.21), for rIFN-gamma 0.87 (0.69, 1.10) and for Iscador M 1.21 (0.84, 1.75), respectively. The results show no clinical benefit for adjuvant treatment with low dose rIFN-alpha2b or rIFN-gamma or with Iscador M in high-risk melanoma patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients: the medical oncologist's perspective

With the advent of sentinel node (sN) biopsy in melanoma patients, elective lymph node dissection (ELND) can be considered an exceeded procedure. Regardless of the possible therapeutic benefits, sN biopsy efficiently predicts prognosis avoiding the morbidity rate of ELND. The importance of the sN is underlined by multivariate analyses, which show that the sN status represents the most important prognostic factor influencing disease-free and distant disease-free survival in patients with stage I and II melanoma. Moreover, sN biopsy provides a minimally invasive method for identifying those patients with subclinical nodal metastasis who actually have stage III disease, with a very high risk of occult distant metastases and who may benefit by adjuvant therapy.

Interferon Alpha as Adjuvant Postsurgical Treatment of Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The literature on the benefit of alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha) as adjuvant postsurgical treatment of melanoma reports discordant results.

OBJECTIVE

With the published data so far, we performed a meta-analysis in order to evaluate the effect of IFN-alpha on the relapse rate (RR) and the overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Published randomised trials were identified by Medline search. Stage IV melanoma was not considered.

RESULTS

Nine published studies were included, with a total of 2,880 patients. Both the per protocol and the intention-to-treat analysis show that IFN-alpha significantly decreased the RR (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.64-0.86). Subgroup analyses show that, for all stages, high and low doses decreased the RR (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.92, and OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63-0.91, respectively). No difference has been evidenced on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

High and low doses of IFN-alpha significantly decrease the RR, but the OS does not seem to be improved.

Adjuvant interferon in high-risk melanoma: the AIM HIGH Study--United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research randomized study of adjuvant low-dose extended-duration interferon Alfa-2a in high-risk resected malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate low-dose extended duration interferon alfa-2a as adjuvant therapy in patients with thick (> or = 4 mm) primary cutaneous melanoma and/or locoregional metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial involving 674 patients, the effect of interferon alfa-2a (3 megaunits three times per week for 2 years or until recurrence) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared with that of no further treatment in radically resected stage IIB and stage III cutaneous malignant melanoma.

RESULTS

The OS and RFS rates at 5 years were 44% (SE, 2.6) and 32% (SE, 2.1), respectively. There was no significant difference in OS or RFS between the interferon-treated and control arms (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.18; P =.6; and OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.10; P =.3; respectively). Male sex (P =.003) and regional lymph node involvement (P =.0009), but not age (P =.7), were statistically significant adverse features for OS. Subgroup analysis by disease stage, age, and sex did not show any clear differences between interferon-treated and control groups in either OS or RFS. Interferon-related toxicities were modest: grade 3 (and in only one case, grade 4) fatigue or mood disturbance was seen in 7% and 4% respectively, of patients. However, there were 50 withdrawals (15%) from interferon treatment due to toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study, taken in isolation, do not indicate that extended-duration low-dose interferon is significantly better than observation alone in the initial treatment of completely resected high-risk malignant melanoma.

Does adjuvant systemic therapy with interferon-alpha for stage II-III melanoma prolong survival?

The experience with interferon-alpha in malignant melanoma resembles, to some degree, the experience with various kinds of adjuvant immunotherapeutic agents where 25 years of phase III trials of adjuvant therapy in stage II-IIII melanoma have not defined a standard therapy. Most trials failed to demonstrate an impact on disease-free survival and overall survival. Currently, data from 12 randomized interferon-alpha trials are available. The data in almost 3000 patients, approximately 50% of the total patient population, is immature and thus, inconclusive. Mature trials show that interferon-alpha significantly prolongs disease-free survival, but does not prolong overall survival, across different dose levels. Ultra-low-dose (1 MIU flat dose), interferon-alpha failed to even have an effect on disease-free survival. Although two trials with high-dose (10-20 MIU/m(2)) interferon-alpha have shown an impact on overall survival, these data are inconclusive since this impact was transient, inconsistent in subsequent trials, and the data was somewhat immature. Inconsistent results have also been observed for intermediate- (5-10 MIU flat dose) and low-dose (3 MIU flat dose) interferon-alpha regimens. The results, overall, suggest that these doses do have an impact on disease-free survival, but not on overall survival. Preliminary results regarding distant metastasis-free survival (the closest surrogate for overall survival available) of the very large European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18952 trial suggests that there is a benefit with long-term low intermediate doses and support the anti-angiogenic concept of long-term maintenance treatment with interferon-alpha. The efficacy of short-term high-dose and long-term intermediate-dose treatment is being investigated in new trials. For now the role of interferon-alpha still remains to be determined and its use should be restricted to the setting of clinical trials.

Reassessing the role of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy was developed as a minimally invasive technique to provide regional lymph node staging information for patients at high risk for metastatic melanoma, but without clinically palpable disease. Only patients who demonstrate micrometastases undergo complete regional lymphadenectomy, sparing approximately 80% of patients the expense and morbidity of an elective lymph node dissection. This technique has been widely accepted as the preferred method to determine the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes and the staging information gained is incorporated into the latest version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. Still, there is much controversy as to the use of this technique as a staging procedure and its overall therapeutic benefit in the treatment of patients with melanoma. Currently ongoing clinical trials will determine if lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy directly influences overall survival for patients with malignant melanoma. We review the latest technical aspects of this procedure and discuss the controversies surrounding its use.

Does adjuvant interferon-alpha for high-risk melanoma provide a worthwhile benefit? A meta-analysis of the randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Several randomised trials have compared interferon-alpha with control as adjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanoma. The results of the individual trials have been either inconclusive or even apparently conflicting. To assess all the available evidence we performed a meta-analysis of these trials.

METHODS

Standard methods for quantitative meta-analysis based on published data were used. Endpoints evaluated were recurrence-free survival and overall survival. A subgroup analysis by dose of interferon-alpha was performed.

FINDINGS

Twelve trials, comprising 14 comparisons of interferon-alpha with control, with results available were identified. Recurrence-free survival was improved with interferon-alpha: hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 0.90, p=0.000003. The benefit on overall survival was less clear (0.93, 0.85 to 1.02, p=0.1) and the confidence interval is compatible both with no benefit and with a moderate, but clinically worthwhile, benefit. There was some evidence of a dose response relationship with a significant trend for the benefit of interferon-alpha to increase with increasing dose for recurrence-free survival (test for trend: p=0.02) but not for overall survival (trend: p=0.8).

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis provides the most reliable synthesis of the data currently available. Adjuvant interferon-alpha produces clear reductions in recurrence of high-risk melanoma, with some evidence of an effect of dose of interferon-alpha, but it is unclear whether this translates into a worthwhile survival benefit or not. Additional and more mature data are needed to resolve these issues and an individual patient data meta-analysis should be performed.

Prospective randomized trial of interferon alfa-2b and interleukin-2 as adjuvant treatment for resected intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma without clinically detectable node metastasis

PURPOSE

Low-dose interferon alfa (IFNalpha) has been shown to have limited effects in the adjuvant treatment of patients with intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma. We hypothesized that a combination regimen with low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) may improve survival prospects in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After wide excision of primary melanoma without clinically detectable lymph node metastasis (pT3 to 4, cN0, M0), 225 patients from 10 participating centers were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous low-dose IFNalpha2b (3 million international units [MU]/m2/d, days 1 to 7, week 1; three times weekly, weeks 3 to 6, repeated all 6 weeks) plus IL-2 (9 MU/m2/d, days 1 to 4, week 2 of each cycle) for 48 weeks, or observation alone. The primary end point was prolongation of a relapse-free interval.

RESULTS

Of the 225 enrolled patients, 223 were found to be eligible. Median follow-up time was 79 months. All evaluated prognostic factors were well balanced between the two arms of the study. Relapses were noticed in 36 of 113 patients treated with IFNalpha2b plus IL-2 and in 34 of 110 patients with observation alone. Five-year disease-free survival of those who had routine surgery supplemented by IFNalpha2b and IL-2 treatment was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.3% to 78.9%), compared with 69.9% in those receiving surgery and observation alone (95% CI, 60.7% to 79.1%) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Evaluation of the overall survival did not show any difference between treated and untreated melanoma patients (P =.93).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant treatment of intermediate- and high-risk melanoma patients with low-dose IFNalpha2b and IL-2 is safe and well tolerated by most patients, but it does not improve disease-free or overall survival.

Improving survival in patients with high-risk and metastatic melanoma: immunotherapy leads the way

Melanoma is a neoplasm with an incidence in the US that is rising at a rate second only to lung cancer in women. Early stage melanoma is curable, but advanced metastatic melanoma is almost uniformly fatal, even in 2003. The close relationship of melanoma with the immune system has led to a recent resurgence in the investigation of immunotherapy in the treatment of this disease. The two most widely investigated immunotherapy drugs for melanoma are interferon (IFN)-alpha and interleukin-2 (IL-2). The role of IFNalpha-2b in the adjuvant therapy of patients with localized melanoma at high risk for relapse has recently been established by the results of three large randomized trials conducted by the US Intergroup; all three trials demonstrated an improvement in relapse-free survival and two in overall survival. Recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) has an overall response rate of 15-20% in metastatic melanoma and is capable of producing complete and durable remissions in about 6% of patients treated. Based upon these data, the US FDA has recently approved the use of high-dose bolus administration of rIL-2 for the therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma. Results of combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimens containing rIL-2 and IFNalpha (biochemotherapy) are promising, but conclusions regarding an advantage for this therapy in terms of survival must await the completion of ongoing randomized trials. The use of therapeutic vaccines is an ongoing area of research, and clinical trials of several types of vaccines (whole cell, carbohydrate, peptide) are being conducted in patients with intermediate and late-stage melanoma. In the setting of adjuvant therapy, to date, no vaccine has demonstrated a survival benefit in comparison with either observation or IFNalpha. Vaccines are also being tested in patients with metastatic melanoma to determine their immune effects and to define their activity in combination with other immunotherapeutic agents such as IL-2 or IFNalpha.

Malignant melanoma

In the European Community cutaneous melanoma accounts for 1 and 1.8% of cancers occurring in men and women, respectively. The incidence rate is increasing faster than that of any other tumour. Sun exposure, patient's phenotype, family history, and history of a previous melanoma are the major risk factors. The change over a period of months is the main sign of a skin lesion turned into a melanoma. The ABCDE scheme for early detection of melanoma is commonly accepted. A new staging classification will be published in the next AJCC/UICC Cancer Staging System Manual in 2002. The clinical course of melanoma is determined by its dissemination and depends on thickness, ulceration, localisation, gender and histology of the primary tumour. Tumour stage at diagnosis remains the major prognostic factor. Surgery is the standard treatment option for operable local-regional disease. Sentinel node biopsy represents a promising experimental approach in the clinical detection and early treatment of occult lymph node involvement. For metastatic inoperable patients systemic chemotherapy can be attempted, while radiation therapy has to be considered as palliative treatment. No studies concerning frequency of follow-up are currently available, but common procedures may be performed.

Melanoma: adjuvant therapy and other treatment options

Melanoma, diagnosed and treated at its earliest stages, can be successfully cured by surgery alone. However, when metastatic beyond the regional nodes, it is almost uniformly deadly. Adjuvant therapy targeted toward the treatment of microscopic residual disease after surgical resection is the subject of intense scientific investigation because this is the stage at which it is possible to have the greatest impact on disease-free and overall survival. However, standard therapies commonly used for other solid tumors have had disappointing results in the treatment of melanoma in the adjuvant setting. These disappointing results have led researchers and clinicians to work to develop innovative treatment strategies for this disease, most of which center on the use of immunotherapy. The realm of cancer immunotherapy is broad and rapidly expanding; it encompasses strategies using immunomodulating agents, such as interferon and interleukin-2, in addition to a wide range of novel vaccination strategies for the induction of active antitumor immune responses. Although clinical trials continue to be conducted to sort out the safety and efficacy of a myriad of new treatment modalities and novel combinations of the old and the new, data indicate that high-dose interferon-alfa-2b should be offered to appropriately selected intermediate- and high-risk patients with melanoma not involved in an experimental protocol.

World Health Organization experience in the treatment of melanoma

The method of randomized trials, as performed by the WHO Melanoma Program, has definitely been a legitimate clinical study design in patients with melanoma from about 1970 to the end of the last century. Three important results of these WHO trials have substantially influenced the approach of the clinician towards melanoma: (1) There is no role for elective regional lymph node dissection, (2) narrow local excision of the primary melanoma does not entail additional risks, and (3) adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy after radical surgery for regional lymph node metastases has not, until now, shown any substantial benefit. A problem arises because randomized clinical studies require long periods of time for patients accrual and completion. Frequently their legitimacy is challenged due to the appearance of new parameters, both regarding staging (eg, the introduction of new technical method such as sentinel node biopsy) and prognosis. Therefore, it would be better to define different clinical study models to quickly test a hypothesis on a small group of selected patients in order to provide quick results. We believe that this is the future of clinical research in the new millennium, because it does not seem reasonable today to plan large clinical trials that need 10 years or more of accrual and follow-up without reaching definite conclusions.

Cytokines as clinical adjuvants: how far are we?

In spite of the explosive growth in the discovery of cytokines and chemokines and in the understanding of their modes of action, clinical use of such agents as adjuvants has been primarily restricted to patients with cancer or chronic viral infections suffering from various levels of immune impairment and for whom the chemotherapeutic armamentarium, as well as other forms of immunotherapy, have been exhausted. This cautious approach has been justified by the difficulties inherent to the biological function and delivery of such pleiotropic agents, where doses needed to achieve the targeted immune enhancement often result in serious side effects, especially during systemic administration. In addition, optimization of dosages, administration schedules and biological effects in humans often do not correlate well with preclinical data derived from animal models. Nevertheless, novel preventive immunization strategies that target a precise type of immune response in immunocompetent individuals are expected to greatly benefit from the incorporation of cytokines and chemokines. This review provides an overview of current clinical administration of cytokines as well as a description of select Phase I testing of new agents designed to enhance immune defenses in vivo.

Cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha2 as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma

An extensive literature review on clinical trials and economic studies published on the use of IFN-alpha as adjuvant therapy in stage II - III (AJCC 1992) malignant melanoma was performed. Large clinical trials with sufficient follow-up were selected to assess the efficacy. Medico-economic studies, based on the results of several of these trials, were analysed to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratios of IFN in this disease. IFN-alpha demonstrated efficacy as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma with high-dose regimens in patients with overt regional nodal disease (so-called high-risk patients) and with low-dose regimens in stage IIA and -B patients without clinically detectable nodes (so-called intermediate risk patients). This efficacy was associated with high rates of severe side effects using a high-dose regimen. Based on these assumptions, economic analyses performed in different settings and using several methods to extrapolate clinical results are producing similar results of extra costs for IFN associated with a medical benefit. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios provided are (< US dollars 50,000 per life year gained) in the range of current and widely used medical strategies in different diseases and settings. This should allow the recommendation of the use of IFN-alpha therapy in malignant melanoma, using high doses in high-risk patients and low doses in intermediate-risk patients. In the final decision of whether or not to treat, however, the patient has to be informed that IFN will probably only delay events, with the possibility of any curative effect being uncertain. This limited effect has to be balanced with the severe impact on quality of life of high-dose regimen and with the fact that many patients in whom low doses are indicated would not recur in the absence of treatment. It is also clear that patients with only a positive sentinel node are to be considered with the intermediate risk group in which they were evaluated.

Current management of melanoma: benefits of surgical staging and adjuvant therapy

Issues regarding appropriate management of stage I to III melanoma are addressed. Accurate surgical staging is critical to identifying patients who can benefit from therapeutic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Patients with primary tumors > or = 1 mm thick are appropriate candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and node-positive patients benefit from therapeutic lymphadenectomy. Although the overall survival benefit of high-dose interferon has been questioned, the weight of evidence supports the use of adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIB and III disease.

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 1

Interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) is a pleiotropic cytokine with direct and indirect antitumour effects. These include prolongation of the cell cycle time of malignant cells, inhibition of biosynthetic enzymes and apoptosis, interaction with other cytokines, and immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects. The first clinical trials in solid tumours used crude preparations of natural IFNalpha and demonstrated that tumour regressions in solid tumours and haematological malignancies were possible. Since the advent of genetic engineering technology, recombinant (r) IFNalpha has been widely evaluated in solid tumours. This review discusses the use and potential of rIFNalpha in solid tumours; the first part focuses on malignant melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma, rIFNalpha has been tested in randomised trials in more than 6000 patients. High-dosage IFNalpha (> or =10MU) prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival (OS). Low-dosage IFNalpha (< or =3MU) has not been shown to prolong DFS or OS, and current data do not support its use outside clinical trials. The latest United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research meta-analysis of ten randomised trials that used adjuvant rIFNalpha has shown that there is a benefit in DFS but not OS. No conclusions can be reached for intermediate-dosage IFNalpha (5 to 10MU) until the mature results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 18952 are available. In RCC, current evidence does not support the use of adjuvant IFNalpha. In metastatic malignant melanoma and RCC, reported response rates to rIFNalpha are approximately 15%. In a minority of responding patients, however, these responses can be long-standing. In metastatic malignant melanoma, IFNalpha combined with other cytotoxic agents with or without interleukin-2 has achieved high response rates but has not improved survival. In metastatic RCC, intermediate dosages of rIFNalpha should be used and therapy should probably be prolonged (>12 months); response depends on prognostic factors such as good performance status, whereas survival is affected by factors such as low tumour burden. Nephrectomy should therefore be considered in patients with good performance status prior to IFNalpha immunotherapy in advanced RCC, even in patients with metastatic disease. The toxicity of high-dosage IFNalpha and the lack of definite benefit on OS with high- or low-dosage IFNalpha do not support its use outside clinical trials. Data from the ongoing US Intergroup studies, the ongoing EORTC 18991 study (long-term therapy with pegylated IFNalpha) and mature data from EORTC 18952 (intermediate-dosage IFNalpha) will help establish the role of IFNalpha as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma.

Diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous melanoma: a practical guide

During the past decades, a number of new scientific evidences have been provided allowing a better understanding of the nature of cutaneous melanoma. New scientific methods, such as dermoscopy, have been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pigmented skin lesions and early recognition of melanoma. Aggressive approaches for the surgical treatment of melanoma have been shown to be useless and have been replaced by more conservative surgical protocols and by sentinel lymph node biopsy. In the advanced stage of melanoma, new chemotherapy protocols and immunotherapy have been proposed, whereas the role of vaccines is still under investigation. In this review, the authors present an up-to-date overview of the epidemiologic, clinical, histopathologic, and therapeutic aspects of melanoma that can be used as a practical guide for the management of this tumor.

New diagnostic techniques in staging in the surgical treatment of cutaneous malignant melanoma

The emphasis of the research on the surgical treatment of melanoma has been on the resection margins, the role of elective lymph node dissection in high risk patients and the value of adjuvant regional treatment with hyperthermic isolated lymph perfusion with melphalan. Parallel to this research, new diagnostic techniques, such as Positron Emission Tomography and the introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy with advanced laboratory methods such as immuno-histochemical markers, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, have been developed to facilitate early detection of metastatic melanoma. The role of these new techniques on the staging and surgical treatment of melanoma is discussed in this paper.

Noninterferon-based adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma

High-dose interferon is the only treatment approved by the FDA for adjuvant therapy of melanoma. However, its efficacy in this setting is questionable and its administration is associated with considerable toxicity. Many new agents are being tested clinically that hold the promise of greater efficacy and less toxicity but none of these have yet shown efficacy in controlled trials. These include biologics such as vaccines, cytokines, monoclonal antibodies, gene transfer, cellular therapies and angiogenesis inhibitors as well as chemotherapy combinations.

Mechanisms and management of toxicities associated with high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy

PURPOSE

The toxicity associated with adjuvant high-dose interferon-alfa-2b therapy (HDI) for high-risk melanoma can lead to premature discontinuation. It is important to understand the expected adverse events and their underlying mechanisms and to anticipate and aggressively manage toxicity during treatment in order to ensure that patients receive the maximum therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

The toxicity profile of HDI was reviewed by examining data from the United States cooperative group trials. Available published data related to the potential mechanisms responsible for the observed adverse events are discussed, and comprehensive recommendations for managing side effects are presented.

RESULTS

The HDI regimen is associated with acute constitutional symptoms, chronic fatigue, myelosuppression, elevated liver enzyme levels, and neurologic symptoms. The majority of patients tolerate 1 year of therapy with an understanding of the anticipated toxicities in conjunction with appropriate dose modifications and supportive care. Ongoing monitoring for liver dysfunction and hematologic toxicity is critical to ensure safety. Many of the toxicities associated with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) seem to be the result of endogenous cytokines and their effects on the neuroendocrine system. Recent data have also demonstrated that IFN-alpha suppresses the activity of specific CYP450 isoenzymes and that this correlates with discrete toxicities. Pharmacologic interventions are under study for fatigue and depression. An increased understanding of the mechanisms of IFN-alpha-associated toxicity will lead to more rational and effective supportive care and improved quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Continued research in this area should lead to improvements in the safety and tolerability of adjuvant therapy for melanoma.

Adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk malignant melanoma

The role of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with high-risk malignant melanoma remains an area of intense investigation. The initial enthusiasm for high-dose interferon has been tempered by the results of more recent studies that allow for conflicting interpretations. Vaccine therapy trials have failed to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit, although several trials are currently ongoing. Recent studies of the role of chemotherapy suggest there may be combinations that have a survival benefit which deserve further study. This article will address patient selection and staging workup, and review options for treatment.